Notebookcheck Logo
Teclast T60 AI

The affordable 12-inch tablet with surprising extras – Teclast T60 AI review

Input pen and folio cover included.

The 12-inch Teclast T60 AI costs less than $200, while still coming with extensive features including a 90 Hz display, a headphone jack and stereo speakers. It also boasts a number of AI functions and even has 2 USB-C ports, one of which supports USB 3.1 Gen 1 and DisplayPort.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android Tablet Touchscreen

Verdict on the Teclast T60 AI

If you're on the hunt for an affordable tablet for surfing and multimedia use, then you may enjoy the Teclast T60 AI, not least because it comes delivered with a folio cover and stylus included. This entry-level tablet has lots of space for content on its 12-inch IPS display and thanks to a desktop mode, multiple apps can be displayed at once. Although its 90 Hz display isn't the brightest, it's still perfectly sufficient for indoor use.

Additional things that speak in favor of the T60 AI include its good features, such as stereo speakers, 128 GB of storage space, a microSD card slot, a 3.5 mm jack and even two USB-C ports, of which one supports fast USB 3.1 Gen 1 and even DisplayPort. The AI functions that give the tablet its name are rather unspectacular apart from AI video upscaling, which delivers surprisingly impressive results.

Disadvantages: The T60 AI doesn't run for particularly long, it takes a while to charge, and it comes with neither GPS, a fingerprint sensor, nor facial recognition using the selfie camera. Adding to this are mediocre cameras and unclear update delivery. Games only run with several limitations and if you place great importance on smooth operation, then you'll be happier with more powerful competitor devices such as the Honor Pad or the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro.

Pros

+ DRM Widevine L1
+ stock Android
+ large 90 Hz display
+ desktop mode with window display
+ good AI video upscaling
+ USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 with DisplayPort
+ barely heats up
+ no PWM flickering
+ folio cover and pen included

Cons

- no GPS
- dim display with inaccurate colors
- no fingerprint sensor
- no facial recognition
- mediocre cameras
- below-average battery life
- unclear update delivery

Price and availability

The Teclast T60 AI retails for $169. You can view Teclast's official stockists via its website.

The key data of the Teclast T60 AI reads promisingly. For less than $200, you get a 12-inch tablet in a metal case with a 2K resolution, 90 Hz refresh rate and 128 GB of storage space. It also comes with Android 15 and a range of AI functions that give the tablet its name.

With its Allwinner A733, the T60 AI is powered by the same eight-core SoC as its sister model, the Teclast P50 AI, which performed well in our test. In the following review, we'll find out whether its 12-inch colleague can follow suit and also earn our recommendation.

Specifications

Teclast T60 AI (T Series)
Processor
Graphics adapter
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
11.97 inch 15:9, 2000 x 1200 pixel 195 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, typical brightness 330 nits, touch sampling rate up to 180 Hz, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 113 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity Sensor, Accelerometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.4 x 283 x 178.2 ( = 0.33 x 11.14 x 7.02 in)
Battery
8000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 10W charging
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix AF, LED flash, AI secondary lens
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, 10W charger (5V/2A), pen, folio cover, user manual, 24 Months Warranty, Camera2 API Limited, fanless
Weight
624 g ( = 22.01 oz / 1.38 pounds), Power Supply: 38 g ( = 1.34 oz / 0.08 pounds)
Price
200 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Teclast T60 AI with a burgundy red metal case

Teclast has packaged its T60 AI inside a metal case, which features a burgundy red color and an octagon-shaped and gold-colored camera bezel on the back.

The case is well made with its rounded corners and edges, but can be dented with little effort and sometimes even just touching it results in a clearly audible creak. Even so, the tablet is sturdy enough for everyday use. Once again, it doesn't have an IP certification.

At 624 grams, the T60 AI weighs slightly more than similarly sized competitors such as the Honor Pad 9 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro, but still doesn't feel too heavy and is nice and thin with a height of 8.4 millimetres. Its display bezels, which are around one centimeter wide on all sides, allow the tablet to be held securely in your hand without making erroneous inputs on its IPS display.

Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI

Size comparison

283 mm / 11.1 in 178.2 mm / 7.02 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 624 g1.376 lbs282 mm / 11.1 in 178 mm / 7.01 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 621 g1.369 lbs280 mm / 11 in 181.85 mm / 7.16 in 7.52 mm / 0.2961 in 571 g1.259 lbs278.27 mm / 11 in 180.11 mm / 7.09 in 6.96 mm / 0.274 in 555 g1.224 lbs268.7 mm / 10.6 in 168.96 mm / 6.65 in 7.15 mm / 0.2815 in 520 g1.146 lbs257.1 mm / 10.1 in 168.7 mm / 6.64 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 480 g1.058 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - 2x USB-C and support for DisplayPort

Teclast has equipped its tablet with 6 GB LPDDR5 RAM and 128 GB UFS 3.1 storage. The RAM can be increased to up to 16 GB via virtual memory expansion, but this is of little use because the tablet only creates a swap file in its much slower UFS storage.

On the other hand, the T60 AI has more to offer when it comes to its interfaces, as the tablet features two USB-C ports with OTG support in addition to a headphone jack and a microSD card reader that can accommodate cards up to 1 TB in size. The upper one works at USB 2.0 speed and is primarily used as a charging port.

The lower USB port supports significantly faster data transfers with USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 (nominally 5 GBit/s) and also functions as a DisplayPort output. This allows the Teclast tablet to mirror its screen content on a monitor or portable display, for example, which worked fine during our test.

Left: 3.5 mm headphone jack, USB-C 2.0, microSD slot, USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 with DisplayPort
Left: 3.5 mm headphone jack, USB-C 2.0, microSD slot, USB-C 3.1 Gen 1 with DisplayPort
Right: no connections
Right: no connections
Top: microphone, volume rocker, power button
Top: microphone, volume rocker, power button
Bottom: speaker
Bottom: speaker

microSD card reader

Using our Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD reference card, the tablet's card reader ran at a comfortable pace. The competition was significantly faster in both the cross-platform disk test and the copying test.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)
42.3 MB/s +58%
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 58.4, n=57, last 2 years)
35.6 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (Angelbird V60)
34.1 MB/s +27%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 (Angelbird V60)
32.9 MB/s +23%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733 (Angelbird V60)
26.8 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.1 (21.2-39)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø40 (31.2-49.9)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.4 (30.1-48.6)
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø52.7 (24.8-58.4)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.7 (33.8-88)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.3 (24.3-88.6)

Software - Android 15, AI functions and desktop mode

The Teclast T60 AI runs Android 15. The Teclast OS is mostly the same as the standard version of Android, so users won't have to get used to a new UI. Included is PC Mode, a special desktop mode designed for use with a mouse and keyboard.

When using PC Mode, apps are launched in a window and can be moved around on the desktop. This even worked with the games PUBG Mobile and Genshin Impact that we installed for our test, which ran in parallel in their own window. However, they could then no longer be controlled properly.

AI features have so far been the big exception for inexpensive tablets. Nevertheless, the T60 AI offers a small selection of them. For example, the 12-inch tablet can improve video image quality, and recognize hand gestures and users' poor posture.

Videos upscaled to the tablet's native resolution actually look a lot better and you can display the original video at the same time to visualize the difference. DRM Widevine L1 is supported, so you can watch copy-protected streams in HD quality.

The T60 AI quickly warns the user of poor posture via a pop-up, and it mostly responded reliably to hand gestures during our test. Still, this always took a while because the selfie camera has to recognize your hand first. For example, you can hold up your hand and then turn your palm to give a back command. On the flip side, the tablet behaved stubbornly when swiping to scroll up or down: it almost always did nothing.

Teclast hasn't provided any information on how long OS upgrades and security updates will be available for the T60 AI and how often they will be provided. Buyers should therefore be prepared for a potentially short support period. At the time of testing, the latest Android security patches were from March 1, so still relatively up-to-date.

Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI

Sustainability

Teclast doesn't attach much importance to sustainability, at least outwardly. There is no information on its website about the tablet's carbon footprint or the manufacturer's environmental efforts. The T60 AI is wrapped in a plastic film and the colorful packaging doesn't reveal the ingredients of the inks that have been used.

Communication and GNSS - The Teclast T60 AI without GPS

The T60 AI supports Bluetooth 5.4 and WiFi 6, but features neither GPS nor an NFC module. In addition, Teclast doesn't offer a cellular version of its 12-inch tablet.

The Teclast tablet uses the latest WiFi standard, namely WiFi 6, but in practice, you won't notice much of it, as it can't use the 6 GHz band. When connected to our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, its transfer rates were only at the level of WiFi 5 and weren't particularly stable.

That being said, you don't usually get much more from the competition in this price range. A commendable exception to this is the now very affordable Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro, which shows how fast WiFi 6 can be using the 5 GHz band.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=148)
843 MBit/s +149%
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1656, n=87, last 2 years)
540 MBit/s +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
528 (438min - 633max) MBit/s +56%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (356min - 387max) MBit/s +9%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
366 (184min - 389max) MBit/s +8%
Teclast T60 AI
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
338 (242min - 371max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
315 (223min - 362max) MBit/s -7%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
263 (212min - 276max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1596 (1524min - 1625max) MBit/s +390%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=146)
827 MBit/s +154%
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1723, n=87, last 2 years)
567 MBit/s +74%
Teclast T60 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (363min - 373max) MBit/s +13%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
352 (125min - 381max) MBit/s +8%
Honor Pad 9
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
349 (171min - 354max) MBit/s +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (172min - 350max) MBit/s +4%
Teclast T60 AI
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
326 (177min - 387max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (242-371)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (356-387)
Teclast T60 AI 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø326 (177-387)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø333 (172-350)

Cameras - Only suitable for snapshots

Photo taken using selfie camera
Photo taken using selfie camera

The T60 AI's selfie camera, which is integrated in the center of the upper frame, has a resolution of 5 MP and delivers passable image quality that's at least okay in good lighting conditions. Overall, however, it only captures few details and doesn't produce particularly sharp images.

The 13 MP main camera on the back doesn't do much better. It's suitable for occasional snapshots, taking photos of documents or scanning QR codes. However, if you enjoy taking photos on a tablet, you likely won't be happy with the T60 AI.

Photos taken with its main camera are sometimes evenly lit, but often appear too bright, as can be seen in the first example image. Overall, the photos show little dynamic range, hardly any sharpness and feature strong background noise. The camera's brightness adjustment and autofocus only work sluggishly. In addition, the latter produces a visible pumping effect when searching for the focus area. Low-light conditions quickly overwhelm the camera.

The tablet can record videos with a maximum of 1080p at 30 frames per second. Its recording quality is comparable to that of its photos.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylight photoLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

In controlled lighting conditions, the device's main camera didn't match the ColorChecker reference colors or grayscale levels very accurately. It didn't capture the test chart sharply even with optimal lighting. At 1 lux of light, it almost disappeared completely in the dark.

ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
19 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 AI: 13.77 ∆E min: 7.89 - max: 19 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
77.1 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
94.8 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
52.9 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast T60 AI: 47.6 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 94.84 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The T60 AI with a 12-month warranty

The Teclast T60 AI comes with a 10-watt power adapter (5V/2A), a USB-C cable, a quick start guide and a warranty card. There is also a folio cover and a stylus included. Teclast doesn't offer any special accessories for its tablet.

The Teclast T60 AI is covered by a standard 12-month warranty.

Input devices and operation - The Teclast tablet with a stylus

The T60 AI's 2K screen is scanned up to 180 times per second, almost always processes inputs quickly and reliably, and runs smoothly thanks to its 90 Hz refresh rate. From time to time, however, taps on the touchscreen seem to be too short for it, meaning the inputs aren't registered and nothing happens.

During our test, we often found that the T60 AI only launched an app, for example, after we had repeated the input and pressed the icon a little longer with our finger or the included stylus. The physical buttons, on the other hand, work perfectly. They sit firmly in its case, are easy to feel and have a clear pressure point.

The stylus may cause some confusion because it looks like a ballpoint pen and its pointed end actually does contain a normal ballpoint pen refill, but the blunt end with its soft rubber attachment is used for inputs on the display.

You can safely transport the Teclast tablet with its folio cover, which is also included in its scope of delivery. The three-part cover can be used as a stand that positions the T60 AI at a fixed angle of around 70 degrees.

The tablet doesn't have a fingerprint sensor or facial recognition via the selfie camera, so it offers no biometric authentication option. Access to the T60 AI can only be protected via a PIN, pattern or password.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display - PWM-free IPS screen at 90 Hz

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

With a pixel density of 195 PPI, the T60 AI's 2000 x 1200 pixel IPS panel offers sufficiently high image sharpness. However, if you look very closely, you can see pixel structures.

When displaying a white background, the Teclast tablet achieves an average brightness of 327 cd/m², which is good enough for indoor use. With an even distribution of bright and dark image areas (APL18 measurement), its brightness increases to up to 365 cd/m². The tablet doesn't support HDR.

The IPS screen doesn't use PWM, which makes the T60 AI suitable for users who are sensitive to screen flickering.

310
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
320
cd/m²
343
cd/m²
334
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 343 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 326.9 cd/m² Minimum: 8.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 343 cd/m²
Contrast: 1715:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 9.5 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
91% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.197
Teclast T60 AI
IPS, 2000x1200, 12"
Honor Pad 9
IPS LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
IPS, 2000x1200, 11.5"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Teclast T60 Plus
IPS LCD, 2000x1200, 12"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Screen
30%
38%
10%
13%
20%
Brightness middle
343
613
79%
473
38%
493
44%
487
42%
513
50%
Brightness
327
570
74%
449
37%
460
41%
472
44%
480
47%
Brightness Distribution
89
87
-2%
87
-2%
90
1%
92
3%
86
-3%
Black Level *
0.2
0.4
-100%
0.25
-25%
0.35
-75%
0.34
-70%
0.4
-100%
Contrast
1715
1533
-11%
1892
10%
1409
-18%
1432
-17%
1283
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.1
2.7
67%
1.56
81%
6
26%
6.16
24%
2.82
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
20.45
5.1
75%
3.8
81%
11.7
43%
10.96
46%
8.83
57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
9.5
3.7
61%
1.3
86%
8.2
14%
6.4
33%
2.9
69%
Gamma
2.197 100%
2.3 96%
2.178 101%
2.21 100%
2.38 92%
2.265 97%
CCT
9376 69%
6763 96%
6726 97%
9131 71%
8212 79%
7189 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8350 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Thanks to its low black value of 0.2 cd/m², the IPS display manages a good contrast ratio of 1715:1, but it unfortunately doesn't display colors particularly accurately. The values we measured are well above the ideal range (Delta-E < 3) and its high color temperature of 9376 K shifts the display into the bluish range.

Color accuracy (color mode natural)
Color accuracy (color mode natural)
Grayscale (color mode natural)
Grayscale (color mode natural)
Color saturation (color mode natural)
Color saturation (color mode natural)
sRGB color space (color mode natural)
sRGB color space (color mode natural)
DCI-P3 color space (color mode natural)
DCI-P3 color space (color mode natural)
AdobeRGB color space (color mode natural)
AdobeRGB color space (color mode natural)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.5 ms rise
↘ 14.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.9 ms rise
↘ 20.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

The tablet's viewing angle-stable IPS screen is only suitable for outdoor use to a limited extent. Due to its low brightness, it's sometimes difficult to read from, even in the shade. The display can't adequately compensate for strong light reflections or direct sunlight.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Teclast T60 AI with the Allwinner A733

Although the Allwinner A733 doesn't turn the T60 AI into a racehorse, it does still give it solid performance. During everyday use, this is usually reflected in smooth operation and is just as sufficient for social media as it is for surfing the web and watching videos. However, similarly priced competitors such as the Honor Pad 9 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro offer significantly better performance.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=91, last 2 years)
1250 Points +99%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1007 Points +60%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
944 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
919 Points +46%
Average Allwinner A733
  (628 - 633, n=2)
631 Points 0%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
628 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
432 Points -31%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
412 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=91, last 2 years)
4018 Points +170%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2773 Points +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2616 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1993 Points +34%
Average Allwinner A733
  (1486 - 1505, n=2)
1496 Points +1%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
1486 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1425 Points -4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1104 Points -26%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 2224, n=76, last 2 years)
827 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
774 Points
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
725 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
693 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
482 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
350 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 10522, n=76, last 2 years)
3101 Points
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2763 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
2744 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1768 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
1320 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1288 Points
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2854581, n=57, last 2 years)
933443 Points +182%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
612145 Points +85%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
490448 Points +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
422144 Points +28%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
330453 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
329731 Points 0%
Average Allwinner A733
  (319869 - 330453, n=2)
325161 Points -2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
250503 Points -24%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
12802 Points +76%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
11693 Points +61%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 25683, n=80, last 2 years)
11002 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10550 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
8752 Points +20%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
7383 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
7268 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (7084 - 7268, n=2)
7176 Points -1%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 2155, n=66, last 2 years)
844 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
747 Points
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
689 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
578 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
419 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
406 Points
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
319 Points
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=65, last 2 years)
4876 Points +131%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4233 Points +101%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4151 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points +71%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2383 Points +13%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2172 Points +3%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
2108 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (1937 - 2108, n=2)
2023 Points -4%
System
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
10083 Points +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
9324 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=65, last 2 years)
7983 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7626 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5259 Points +10%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
4789 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (4614 - 4789, n=2)
4702 Points -2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3901 Points -19%
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17036, n=65, last 2 years)
5684 Points +87%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4837 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
3222 Points +6%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
3046 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (2602 - 3046, n=2)
2824 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2554 Points -16%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2412 Points -21%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=65, last 2 years)
11544 Points +874%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
5783 Points +388%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
4622 Points +290%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4337 Points +266%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2243 Points +89%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1928 Points +63%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
1185 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (1067 - 1185, n=2)
1126 Points -5%
Web
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2273, n=65, last 2 years)
1373 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1307 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1297 Points +13%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
1192 Points +4%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1161 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
1143 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (1099 - 1143, n=2)
1121 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1071 Points -6%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=64, last 2 years)
11971 Points +204%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
7236 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
7223 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
5687 Points +44%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4759 Points +21%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
3937 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3820 Points -3%
Average Allwinner A733
  (3600 - 3937, n=2)
3769 Points -4%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
38990 Points +15071%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 156427, n=57, last 2 years)
6674 Points +2497%
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
644 Points +151%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
498 Points +94%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
429 Points +67%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
258 Points 0%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
257 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (252 - 257, n=2)
255 Points -1%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
740 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (243 - 1243, n=8, last 2 years)
705 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 5204, n=8, last 2 years)
1683 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
743 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Tablet
  (508 - 4998, n=8, last 2 years)
2014 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
1545 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet
  (97.8 - 8305, n=7, last 2 years)
1944 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 6144
456 Points
Score V6
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 12784, n=13, last 2 years)
2401 Points +1806%
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733, IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, 6144
126 Points
Average Allwinner A733
  (n=1)
126 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
113 Points -10%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
99.7 Points -21%

In the GPU tests, the Teclast tablet was almost always at the back of the pack. The graphics performance of the IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 used in the Allwinner A733 was only sufficient to display graphically very simple benchmarks smoothly.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
779 Points +528%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
611 Points +393%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +185%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
183 Points +48%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
127 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
124 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
789 Points +552%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
618 Points +411%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +198%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points +56%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
123 Points +2%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2998 Points +541%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2402 Points +413%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +158%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
753 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
583 Points +25%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
468 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2954 Points +541%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2367 Points +413%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +164%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
738 Points +60%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
598 Points +30%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
461 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +15%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2966 Points
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2499 Points -16%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2012 Points -32%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5420 Points +719%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +352%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1325 Points +100%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1254 Points +89%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
662 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4894 Points +512%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +284%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1479 Points +85%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1367 Points +71%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
800 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +273%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +259%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +168%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps +82%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
122 fps +408%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
105 fps +338%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +288%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
44 fps +83%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +221%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps +200%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps +150%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +71%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps +380%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +313%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +213%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
25 fps +67%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +259%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +215%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps +161%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +63%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.2 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps +441%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +369%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +247%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +63%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.8 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +400%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +295%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps +189%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps +105%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3.8 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps +625%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps +475%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +375%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.6 fps +140%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +319%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +255%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +203%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps +61%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3.1 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +550%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11.2 fps +460%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +310%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps +55%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +304%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +246%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps +188%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps +44%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.2 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +507%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps +454%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +293%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps +41%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.6 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +628%
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4.8 fps +493%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +344%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +73%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
0.81 fps
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
fps -100%

The browser benchmark results don't show the T60 AI's performance in a particularly good light. Nevertheless, you can still surf the web quickly on the tablet and rarely have to wait until a page is fully loaded.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=73, last 2 years)
130.9 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
116.621 Points +105%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +70%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
88.235 Points +55%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
66.048 Points +16%
Average Allwinner A733 (56.9 - 67.6, n=2)
62.3 Points +10%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
56.868 Points
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
47.986 Points -16%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=64, last 2 years)
157.7 runs/min +250%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
86.6 runs/min +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +59%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
61.9 runs/min +38%
Average Allwinner A733 (45 - 55.8, n=2)
50.4 runs/min +12%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
45 runs/min
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=46, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min +360%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
6.72 runs/min +124%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
4.74 runs/min +58%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
3.7 runs/min +23%
Average Allwinner A733 (3 - 3.75, n=2)
3.38 runs/min +13%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
3.13 runs/min +4%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
3 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=74, last 2 years)
120.1 Points +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
112 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +88%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
95 Points +67%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
68 Points +19%
Average Allwinner A733 (57 - 66, n=2)
61.5 Points +8%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
57 Points
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
54 Points -5%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=98, last 2 years)
36251 Points +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
34923 Points +92%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
32436 Points +79%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +61%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
18158 Points
Average Allwinner A733 (17241 - 18158, n=2)
17700 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
16498 Points -9%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
15102 Points -17%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=83, last 2 years)
3239 ms * -24%
Teclast T60 Plus (Chrome 131)
2743.4 ms * -5%
Teclast T60 AI (Chrome 136.0.7103.87)
2603.5 ms *
Average Allwinner A733 (2376 - 2604, n=2)
2490 ms * +4%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus (Chrome 131.0.6778.260)
2459.4 ms * +6%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +48%
Honor Pad 9 (Chrome 122)
1321.1 ms * +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro (Chrome 128)
1151.6 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

According to Teclast, UFS 3.1 storage is used inside the T60 AI. Even so, it doesn't work very efficiently in this tablet, only reaching a level of UFS 2.2 in terms of its read and write speeds. Nevertheless, this isn't necessarily a bad thing, as many other inexpensive tablets only use significantly slower eMMC flash storage.

Teclast T60 AIHonor Pad 9Lenovo Tab K11 PlusSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+Teclast T60 PlusXiaomi Redmi Pad ProAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
149%
86%
7%
-66%
62%
86%
101%
Sequential Read 256KB
1106.24
1921.34
74%
1003.25
-9%
485.96
-56%
296.42
-73%
844.9
-24%
Sequential Write 256KB
252.07
1222.83
385%
876.29
248%
476.37
89%
193.23
-23%
705.3
180%
Random Read 4KB
228.09
256.06
12%
244.03
7%
130.67
-43%
49.58
-78%
215.5
-6%
Random Write 4KB
117.81
266.17
126%
232.16
97%
162.9
38%
13.21
-89%
231.4
96%

Games - Rarely run smoothly

Our tests using Gamebench and a small selection of games revealed that the T60 AI can run graphically simpler games quite smoothly. PUBG Mobile ran at a relatively constant 30 frames per second in the HD setting, although the frame rate did dip.

Genshin Impact, on the other hand, was no fun to play at all. On average, the graphically demanding adventure role-playing game only ran at a jerky 17 frames per second, even at the lowest detail level.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.6.0_32604286_32602175: Ø17.2 (11-22)
Teclast T60 AI; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 5.6.0_32604286_32602175: Ø10.2 (6-14)
Teclast T60 AI; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.8.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)
Teclast T60 AI; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.8.0: Ø29.8 (16-31)

Emissions - The T60 AI with stereo speakers

Temperature

The Teclast tablet remains cool during operation and didn't get more than lukewarm even after an hour of maximum load using the Burnout benchmark. The SoC was similarly unimpressed. As the 3DMark stress tests showed, its performance practically doesn't slow down at all under load.

Max. Load
 30.9 °C
88 F
30.8 °C
87 F
26 °C
79 F
 
 35.2 °C
95 F
26.8 °C
80 F
26.5 °C
80 F
 
 30.5 °C
87 F
26.5 °C
80 F
26.4 °C
80 F
 
Maximum: 35.2 °C = 95 F
Average: 28.8 °C = 84 F
26.5 °C
80 F
26.9 °C
80 F
28.2 °C
83 F
27.2 °C
81 F
29.7 °C
85 F
34.6 °C
94 F
27.4 °C
81 F
27.6 °C
82 F
33 °C
91 F
Maximum: 34.6 °C = 94 F
Average: 29 °C = 84 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.9 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 19.6 °C = 67 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.5 % 0%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Honor Pad 9
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +2%
Teclast T60 Plus
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 % +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % +2%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % 0%
Teclast T60 AI
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.5 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
%
01234567891011121314151617Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.725 (0.717-0.735)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.65 (3.65-3.66)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.758 (0.748-0.766)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.146 (1.141-1.149)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.69 (4.65-4.7)
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.78 (2.78-2.79)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.1 (14.1-14.1)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.56 (3.55-3.56)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Teclast T60 Plus Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.44 (4.43-4.45)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø17.7 (17.7-17.7)
Teclast T60 AI IMG BXM-4-64 MC1, A733, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.81 (2.81-2.81)
Honor Pad 9 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.2-14.3)
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus Adreno 610, SD 680, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.49 (3.49-3.49)
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI

Speakers

The T60 AI is equipped with stereo speakers located on the bottom of its case. In the frequency diagram, the mids are the most present, while bass can't be heard in the sound mix. Overall, its sound quality is okay for this price range.

External audio devices can be connected to the tablet via the 3.5 mm jack and Bluetooth 5.4. The Bluetooth codecs available are SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, LC3 and Opus.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.8442541.837.63128.429.64028.830.95032.733632625.68018.321.710022.925.312524.226.81602037.820018.443.325015.24831513.854.140013.155.850015.663.66302372.580020.272.6100016.471.6125013.872.7160014.571.6200015.172.5250014.573.231501978.5400019.377.650002470.6630019.967.1800024.172.91000018.869.31250017.856.21600017.343.9SPL31.685.5N1.562.2median 18.4median 69.3Delta2.910.628.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast T60 AISamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast T60 AI audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 73% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - The 12-inch tablet with little stamina

Power consumption

The T60 AI's 8000 mAh battery can be fully recharged in around 4 hours using the included power adapter. In terms of its power consumption, the tablet behaved inconspicuously during our test, consuming slightly less power in idle mode than the comparison devices.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Load midlight 6.6 / 11.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Teclast T60 AI
8000 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Average Allwinner A733
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
-134%
28%
-49%
-11%
-11%
0%
-48%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
1.5
6%
1.1
31%
1
37%
1.8
-13%
1.7
-6%
1.6 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.9
8.39
-342%
1.3
32%
4.76
-151%
2.2
-16%
2.2
-16%
1.9 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
8.46
-253%
1.6
33%
4.79
-100%
2.9
-21%
2.9
-21%
2.4 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average *
6.6
11.65
-77%
4.4
33%
9.52
-44%
6.7
-2%
5.8
12%
6.6 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum *
11.1
11.67
-5%
9.8
12%
9.92
11%
11.4
-3%
13.9
-25%
11.1 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011121314Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.87 (2.36-11.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.05 (1.974-6.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.65 (5.85-14.8)
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.809 (1.553-2.41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (4.22-4.64)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.41 (4.18-4.71)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø6.57 (6.35-6.93)
Teclast T60 AI Allwinner A733; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.809 (1.553-2.41)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.02 (1.986-2.31)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.55 (2.4-3.43)

Runtimes

Despite its 8000 mAh battery and somewhat weak processor, the T60 AI doesn't achieve particularly good runtimes. With the screen brightness adjusted to 150 cd/m², it managed around 10 hours of continuous video playback and 9:35 hours of simulated web surfing. Some of the competition has much more to offer in this respect. The Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro stand out in particular.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
19h 37min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 37min
Teclast T60 AI
8000 mAh
Honor Pad 9
8300 mAh
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
8600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Teclast T60 Plus
8000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
10000 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
24%
49%
2%
60%
Reader / Idle
1177
1517
29%
2275
93%
1074
-9%
2236
90%
H.264
604
727
20%
800
32%
685
13%
1052
74%
WiFi v1.3
575
661
15%
734
28%
920
60%
667
16%
924
61%
Load
217
260
20%
243
12%
192
-12%
245
13%

Notebookcheck total rating

The 12-inch Teclast T60 AI is an inexpensive and well-equipped entry-level tablet with a 90 Hz display and solid performance that is sufficient for multimedia use. However, its battery life is below average, charging times are long and its update supply is unclear.

Teclast T60 AI - 05/21/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
76 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
64 / 80 → 79%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
45 / 69 → 65%
Weight
81 / 40-88 → 86%
Battery
88%
Display
72%
Games Performance
2 / 65 → 3%
Application Performance
44 / 92 → 48%
AI Performance
7%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 81%
Camera
45 / 90 → 50%
Average
52%
74%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
25%
Power Use
95.2%
Repairability
20%
Software Updates
22.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 31.3%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
73.5%
Teclast T60 AI
Teclast T60 AI
Allwinner A733 ⎘
IMG BXM-4-64 MC1 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $18.99
Tablet Case Cover for Teclas...
3. $16.99
Vaxson 2-Pack Back Protector...
List Price: 200 Euro
624 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.97"
2000x1200
195 PPI
IPS
2.
84.8% v7 (old)
Honor Pad 9
Honor Pad 9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $299.00
HONOR Pad 9 8GB 128GB Wifi 1...
2. $12.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $12.99
Protective Case for Huawei H...
List Price: 350€
555 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS LCD
3.
78.1%
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Lenovo Tab K11 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $199.00
Lenovo Tab K11 TB330XU Table...
2. $171.18
Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa...
3. $48.89
TabPen Plus for Lenovo Tab P...
520 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.45"
2000x1200
204 PPI
IPS
4.
84.2% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 249€480 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"
1920x1200
206 PPI
TFT-LCD
5.
73.8%
Teclast T60 Plus
Teclast T60 Plus
Mediatek Helio G88 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for TECLAST T60 Plus...
2. $12.59
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $18.59
Sfulatdc Silicone Tablet Cas...
List Price: 180€
621 g128 GB eMMC Flash11.97"
2000x1200
195 PPI
IPS LCD
6.
78.7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $299.50
List Price: 380€
571 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash12.10"
2560x1600
249 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The affordable 12-inch tablet with surprising extras – Teclast T60 AI review
Manuel Masiero, 2025-05-24 (Update: 2025-05-24)