Notebookcheck Logo

Teclast P26T review - Opinions differ about the budget tablet

Affordable or already too cheap? A tablet for 100 Euros (~$108), can this work? With many affordable competitors, we can definitely give a positive answer to this question. But with the Teclast P26T, the combination of several disadvantages makes us doubt that the 10.1-inch tablet is a good deal, despite its affordable price. Our test shows for whom a purchase might still be worthwhile.
Teclast P26T

With the P26T, the Chinese manufacturer Teclast offers a very affordable Android tablet. Officially, the 10.1-inch tablet costs 100 US-Dollars and is available (in Germany) on Amazon, for example, where you can often get it for sale at even less than 100 Euros.

In budget tablets, some limitations on the performance, battery life, and display are often a given. But at first glance, the Teclast P26T offers fairly solid equipment with Android 13, the Allwinner A523 octa-core SoC, 4 GB of RAM, 128 GB storage, an IPS panel, and a 6000-mAh battery. Our test shows the actual capabilities of the Teclast P26T and for whom it might be a suitable tablet.

Teclast P26T
Processor
Allwinner A523 8 x 0.5 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 149 PPI, 10 point multitouch, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm headphone jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB, Sensors: accelerometer, hall, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Limited, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.2 x 245.8 x 153.4 ( = 0.4 x 9.68 x 6.04 in)
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix LED Flash
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 10W charger (5V/2A), USB cable, protective case, quick start guide, warranty card, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
511 g ( = 18.03 oz / 1.13 pounds), Power Supply: 42 g ( = 1.48 oz / 0.09 pounds)
Price
100 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
75.2 %
02/2024
Teclast P26T
A523, Mali-G57 MP1
511 g10.2 mm10.10"1280x800
80.4 %
01/2024
Blackview Tab 80
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
484 g7.5 mm10.10"1280x800
80 %
03/2023
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
T610, Mali-G52 MP2
460 g8.5 mm10.10"1920x1200
79.4 %
01/2024
Teclast M50 HD
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
435 g8 mm10.10"1920x1200
81.2 %
05/2023
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
T618, Mali-G52 MP2
477 g7 mm10.40"2000x1200
83.5 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
481 g7.36 mm11.00"1920x1200

Case - Blue plastic with a wave pattern

At 511 grams (~18 oz), the Teclast P26T weighs slightly more than similarly affordable comparison devices such as the Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3. The display bezels aren't very small at 1.4 cm (~0.55 in) on the short and 0.8 cm (~0.31 in) on the long sides, but they help avoiding accidental inputs on the touchscreen. Teclast has chosen an unusual position for the selfie camera, which is placed to the left of the display below the top.

A bright blue back cover is the design characteristic of the Teclast P26T that stands out most. The matte back cover is textured with a wavy pattern that reflects the light in different ways depending on the viewing angle and looks fairly attractive. The wavy texture can be clearly felt and also makes for a more secure grip. Teclast doesn't offer any other color versions.

The P26T doesn't include an IP certification, so there is no particular protection from dust or water. The tablet responds to attempts of twisting with some quiet creaking noises. The IPS panel also doesn't respond well to some stronger pressure, producing some image artifacts. But overall, the P26T gives a fairly stable impression and offers good workmanship.

Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T

Size Comparison

255.53 mm / 10.1 inch 167.08 mm / 6.58 inch 7.36 mm / 0.2898 inch 481 g1.06 lbs245.8 mm / 9.68 inch 153.4 mm / 6.04 inch 10.2 mm / 0.4016 inch 511 g1.127 lbs248 mm / 9.76 inch 157 mm / 6.18 inch 7 mm / 0.2756 inch 477 g1.052 lbs241 mm / 9.49 inch 156 mm / 6.14 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 484 g1.067 lbs239.84 mm / 9.44 inch 158.62 mm / 6.24 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 460 g1.014 lbs238.4 mm / 9.39 inch 157.7 mm / 6.21 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 435 g0.959 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Equipment - A lot of storage space in the Teclast P26T

With 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage, the Teclast P26T offers fairly solid storage equipment considering its price. The manufacturer even mentions up to 8 GB of RAM, although those are only reached by swapping to a file in the flash storage that runs significantly slower than the RAM.

In practice, the "Expandable RAM" feature is hardly relevant and should only be used if a sufficient amount of storage space is still available. In a newly configured P26T, this is 109 GB. If you turn off the RAM expansion, which is activated by default, another 4 GB are added.

The USB-C port of the Teclast tablet runs at USB-2.0 speed and supports USB-OTG, allowing you to connect external storage media, for example. You can also expand the storage by using the microSD slot, which is placed on the left side of the case and accepts cards up to 1 TB. A dedicated 3.5-mm audio port is also available for audio output. The P26T doesn't support NFC.

Left: USB-C 2.0, microSD slot
Left: USB-C 2.0, microSD slot
Right: stereo speakers
Right: stereo speakers
Top: 3.5 mm audio port, volume rocker, power button, microphone
Top: 3.5 mm audio port, volume rocker, power button, microphone
Bottom: microphone
Bottom: microphone

microSD Card Reader

Using our Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD reference card, the card reader only achieves a fairly low transfer speed of 25.3 MB/s, but this isn't unusual for this price class.

The microSD card reader runs even slower during sequential reads and writes. At a maximum of 56.6 and 37.1 MB/s respectively, not only does it remain far from the capabilities of the Angelbird AV Pro V60, but it is also surpassed by the card readers of several comparison devices such as the Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022, for example.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
35.2 MB/s +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
28.92 MB/s +14%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.6 MB/s +5%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
25.3 MB/s
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
21.3 MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.9 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.8 (20.9-37.1)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.2 (18.7-44.8)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34 (17.4-45.3)
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.1 (30.7-46.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.5 (12.9-44.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.7 (21.9-44.3)
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø49.1 (29.5-56.4)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77 (38.6-86.6)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.3 (43.6-81.3)
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.2 (41.4-81.8)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.6 (44.2-82)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.6 (36.3-77.6)

Software - Pure Android 13 and DRM Widevine L1

The budget tablet from Teclast includes Android 13 and comes without any added advertising apps from third-party vendors, which allows you to use the storage space effectively. The manufacturer also didn't make any changes to the Android user interface, so buyers don't have to get used to a new UI. In addition, DRM Widevine L1 is supported for HD streaming.

At the time of this test at the end of January, the Teclast P26T received a system update to version V1.07.20240102, which brought its Android security patches to the level of Nov 5, 2023. So they still aren't very current, despite getting the newest software update. Teclast doesn't specify how long the tablet will receive security updates, what the update intervals are, or whether the tablet will receive any OS updates. Teclast also didn't respond when we asked for additional information.

Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T

Communication and GNSS - Lame Wi-Fi 5 with connection problems

The Teclast P26T communicates wirelessly using Bluetooth 5.2 and Wi-Fi 5. When connected to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the tablet only reaches maximum transfer speeds of 184 Mb/s. The transfer rates also vary significantly, and the reception even completely stops at times.

We also encountered repeated connection problems with the GT-AXE11000 that were clearly noticeable in everyday operation. The same happened with other routers in our test. For example, the P26T didn't recognize the 5-GHz network of our Fritzbox 7490 router and was only able to create a connection to it after we selected the 2.4-GHz band. On the other hand, after a reboot the tablet recognized the 5-GHz band of the router again without any problems.

Since the Teclast P26T doesn't include a GPS module, it is not suited for navigation tasks.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
319 (310min - 325max) MBit/s +354%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
317 (251min - 326max) MBit/s +351%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
307 (284min - 322max) MBit/s +337%
Teclast M50 HD
305 (259min - 319max) MBit/s +334%
Teclast P26T
70.3 (2min - 157max) MBit/s
Blackview Tab 80
44.1 (27min - 57max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
369 (179min - 379max) MBit/s +198%
Teclast M50 HD
358 (336min - 370max) MBit/s +189%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
351 (333min - 366max) MBit/s +183%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
218 (172min - 258max) MBit/s +76%
Teclast P26T
124 (99min - 184max) MBit/s
Blackview Tab 80
47.8 (32min - 60max) MBit/s -61%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø72.7 (2-157)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø317 (251-326)
Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø124.1 (99-184)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø218 (172-258)

Cameras - 5-MP main camera with blurry images

Picture taken with the selfie camera
Picture taken with the selfie camera

Most of the time, you cannot expect much from a camera module of an affordable tablet. This is also the case with the Teclast P26T. Its selfie camera has a 2-MP resolution, and its pictures are not very sharp or bright even in good light conditions.

Even though the image quality of the selfie camera is mostly sufficient for video chats, you also have to be willing to accept some compromises. To use the selfie camera, you should hold the P26T in portrait orientation. Since the camera is positioned to the left of the display, you can only see yourself in landscape orientation, if you hold the tablet in front of yourself shifted toward the right side. This can become quite uncomfortable particularly for longer video chats.

The main camera offers a 5-MP resolution and an LED flash. The second lens that is placed below looks exactly the same but is only used as a depth sensor. It has a 0.3-MP resolution and collects additional information for blurring effects.

Blurriness is also the word to describe the image quality, since the main camera noticeably lacks some sharpness. The images appear pale overall and often include color edges or spotty areas. The color reproduction, on the other hand, appears natural. The 5-MP camera surrenders completely in weak light conditions, only producing dark and blurry pictures. 

The main camera can record videos in a maximum resolution of 1080p at 30 frames per second. But the pale and blurry images make the recordings hardly usable.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Lowlight-Aufnahme
click to load images

We take another detailed look at the main camera under controlled light conditions. But the results don't show any improvements. Even with optimal illumination, the recordings are blurry, and under only 1 Lux of remaining light, nothing is visible in the test chart anymore.

ColorChecker
6.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast P26T: 9.86 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 16.63 ∆E
ColorChecker
27 ∆E
53 ∆E
39.3 ∆E
41 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
68.9 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
25.3 ∆E
68.6 ∆E
66.5 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
79 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
51.2 ∆E
89.7 ∆E
70.9 ∆E
52.1 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Teclast P26T: 47.61 ∆E min: 17.52 - max: 89.71 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - Folio cover included

The included 10-Watt charger
The included 10-Watt charger

The box of the Teclast P26T includes a 10-Watt charger (5V/2A), a USB cable, a folio cover, and some brief instructions. A SIM tool isn't included, but you won't need one since the microSD slot doesn't have a cover and is directly accessible.

Teclast offers a 12-month warranty on the P26T.

Input Devices and Operation - 2D face recognition needs a lot of light

The 16:10 touchscreen of the Teclast P26T implements inputs relatively speedily. But you will quickly notice during its operation that the Allwinner A523 isn't a performance champion. Even though it has access to 4 GB of RAM in the tablet, there are repeated small delays and wait times in everyday operation. At times, you also have to click some items a second time to get a response. Scroll gestures and other animations appear choppy with the 60-Hz refresh rate.

To unlock the tablet, besides a pattern, PIN, or password, you can also use 2D face recognition using the selfie camera. However, that really only works quickly and reliably if there is sufficient surrounding light. In our test, the camera won't recognize us anymore even in some slightly darker rooms when the shades are down, for example.

Keyboard in landscape format
Keyboard in landscape format
Keyboard in portrait format
Keyboard in portrait format

Display - Dark IPS panel with a color tint

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The IPS panel of the Teclast P26T has a 1280x800 pixel resolution, which is quite low for the budget segment. This results in a pixel density of only 140 PPI for the 16:10 display, making the screen not very sharp. The display doesn't support HDR.

In terms of the remaining display parameters, the Teclast tablet also places at the bottom when it is compared against current devices in the same price class. With a white background, the maximum brightness of the IPS panel reaches up to 262 cd/m², while with an even distribution of light and dark image areas (APL18-measurement) the maximum is 258 cd/m². Some competitors such as the Blackview Tab 80 reach significantly higher values here.

The meager contrast ratio of 620:1 makes image content appear not very vibrant. In addition, the colors clearly have a blue tint, which further increases the bloodless image impression. On the other hand, pulse-width modulation (PWM) is not used, even in very low brightness settings, making the P26T very suitable even for users that are very sensitive to PWM.

262
cd/m²
242
cd/m²
211
cd/m²
245
cd/m²
248
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
241
cd/m²
239
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 262 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 236.2 cd/m² Minimum: 27.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 248 cd/m²
Contrast: 620:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 10.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
83.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.438
Teclast P26T
IPS, 1280x800, 10.10
Blackview Tab 80
LCD, 1280x800, 10.10
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Teclast M50 HD
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11.00
Screen
48%
36%
13%
20%
74%
Brightness middle
248
425
71%
343
38%
246
-1%
322
30%
473
91%
Brightness
236
423
79%
332
41%
227
-4%
303
28%
449
90%
Brightness Distribution
81
83
2%
94
16%
88
9%
89
10%
85
5%
Black Level *
0.4
0.4
-0%
0.31
22%
0.33
17%
0.45
-13%
0.28
30%
Contrast
620
1063
71%
1106
78%
745
20%
716
15%
1689
172%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
8.62
5.11
41%
5.9
32%
6.28
27%
7.02
19%
3
65%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
17.81
9.8
45%
11.2
37%
14.1
21%
10.38
42%
6
66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
10.1
2.8
72%
7.9
22%
8.8
13%
7.1
30%
2.7
73%
Gamma
2.438 90%
2.183 101%
2.184 101%
2.277 97%
2.179 101%
2.27 97%
CCT
10183 64%
7136 91%
9198 71%
8024 81%
8730 74%
6589 99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18187 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Our tests with the Calman analysis software and spectral photometer show that the IPS panel reproduces colors very distorted, particularly overdoing it with blue and green color tones. In addition, the color space coverage is very low overall.

Color accuracy
Color accuracy
Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation
sRGB color space coverage
sRGB color space coverage
DCI-P3 color space coverage
DCI-P3 color space coverage
AdobeRGB color space coverage
AdobeRGB color space coverage

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
25.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.6 ms rise
↘ 13.1 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
60.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 33.7 ms rise
↘ 26.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (34 ms).

With the low brightness of its IPS panel, the Teclast P26T is hardly suitable for outdoor use. Even under an overcast January sky, the contents are difficult to see on the display. This means that reading the screen contents would be even harder in summer, also in the shade. The viewing angles of the display are stable.

Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Outdoor use (full display brightness)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Allwinner SoC with few performance reserves

The Allwinner A523 processor keeps things running in the Teclast P26T. The entry-level octa-core SoC uses two quad-core clusters that a consist of 4 Cortex-A55 cores each. The faster quad-cluster runs at a clock speed of up to 1.8 GHz and the second at up to 1.4 GHz. The Allwinner A523 is accompanied by the ARM Mali-G57 MC1 as the graphics unit.

What can be seen in everyday operation is also confirmed by the benchmarks: The Allwinner A523 is not very powerful. The octa-core SoC makes the P26T a tablet with a speed that is below average even looking at budget criteria. But if the load you are placing on the 10.1-inch tablet isn't too high with very demanding apps, everything will run at a satisfactory speed most of the time.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=64, last 2 years)
678 Points +306%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
384 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
373 Points +123%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
346 Points +107%
Blackview Tab 80
309 Points +85%
Teclast M50 HD
305 Points +83%
Average Allwinner A523 (167 - 171, n=2)
169 Points +1%
Teclast P26T
167 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=64, last 2 years)
2429 Points +212%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1684 Points +116%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
1345 Points +73%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1267 Points +63%
Blackview Tab 80
1245 Points +60%
Teclast M50 HD
1191 Points +53%
Average Allwinner A523 (778 - 815, n=2)
797 Points +2%
Teclast P26T
778 Points
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (185 - 2107, n=39, last 2 years)
796 Points +251%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
413 Points +82%
Blackview Tab 80
377 Points +66%
Teclast M50 HD
372 Points +64%
Average Allwinner A523 (227 - 231, n=2)
229 Points +1%
Teclast P26T
227 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (493 - 5652, n=39, last 2 years)
2251 Points +164%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1439 Points +69%
Teclast M50 HD
1392 Points +63%
Blackview Tab 80
1298 Points +52%
Teclast P26T
854 Points
Average Allwinner A523 (852 - 854, n=2)
853 Points 0%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=51, last 2 years)
458635 Points +262%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
213115 Points +68%
Teclast M50 HD
202973 Points +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
201810 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
199786 Points +58%
Average Allwinner A523 (126757 - 136065, n=2)
131411 Points +4%
Teclast P26T
126757 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=60, last 2 years)
8491 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
7404 Points +42%
Teclast M50 HD
7259 Points +39%
Blackview Tab 80
7178 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
7068 Points +35%
Average Allwinner A523 (5224 - 5749, n=2)
5487 Points +5%
Teclast P26T
5224 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=49, last 2 years)
3536 Points +157%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2551 Points +85%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
2550 Points +85%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
2283 Points +66%
Teclast M50 HD
1923 Points +40%
Blackview Tab 80
1887 Points +37%
Teclast P26T
1378 Points
Average Allwinner A523
1378 Points 0%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=49, last 2 years)
6324 Points +139%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
5580 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
5507 Points +108%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
4777 Points +81%
Teclast M50 HD
4335 Points +64%
Blackview Tab 80
4335 Points +64%
Teclast P26T
2642 Points
Average Allwinner A523
2642 Points 0%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 8890, n=49, last 2 years)
4207 Points +206%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
3412 Points +149%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
3178 Points +131%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
3120 Points +127%
Teclast M50 HD
2805 Points +104%
Blackview Tab 80
2675 Points +95%
Teclast P26T
1373 Points
Average Allwinner A523
1373 Points 0%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=49, last 2 years)
6459 Points +434%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
2179 Points +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
2124 Points +76%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1497 Points +24%
Teclast P26T
1210 Points
Average Allwinner A523
1210 Points 0%
Blackview Tab 80
1076 Points -11%
Teclast M50 HD
1011 Points -16%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=49, last 2 years)
1191 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
1138 Points +38%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
1116 Points +36%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1114 Points +36%
Teclast M50 HD
1112 Points +35%
Blackview Tab 80
1034 Points +26%
Teclast P26T
822 Points
Average Allwinner A523
822 Points 0%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=36, last 2 years)
5710 Points +4038%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
348 Points +152%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
304 Points +120%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
302 Points +119%
Teclast M50 HD
279 Points +102%
Blackview Tab 80
256 Points +86%
Average Allwinner A523 (138 - 162, n=2)
150 Points +9%
Teclast P26T
138 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 44323, n=46, last 2 years)
8783 Points +219%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
4150 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
4094 Points +48%
Average Allwinner A523 (2757 - 2824, n=2)
2791 Points +1%
Teclast P26T
2757 Points
Teclast M50 HD
2690 Points -2%
Blackview Tab 80
2678 Points -3%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
1662 Points -40%

Legend

 
Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview Tab 80 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast M50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash

The ARM Mali-G57 MC1 helps the Teclast P26T to stand up better against the competitors than in the synthetic benchmarks. As the T-Rex benchmark from GFXBench shows, values around 30 frames per second are quite realistic while gaming. What mainly benefits the tablet here is its low display resolution of 1280x800 pixels, meaning that it has to compute significantly less pixels than many of its competitors.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
185 Points +36%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
136 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
132 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
121 Points -11%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
104 Points -24%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
100 Points -26%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
189 Points +35%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
140 Points
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
135 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
123 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
101 Points -28%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
90 Points -36%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
722 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
574 Points +15%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
522 Points +4%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
500 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
424 Points -15%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
421 Points -16%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
721 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
589 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
524 Points +3%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
508 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
432 Points -15%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
425 Points -16%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1527 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1429 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1146 Points +11%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1029 Points
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
989 Points -4%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
978 Points -5%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1332 Points +41%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1309 Points +39%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points +4%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
942 Points
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
829 Points -12%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
822 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3124 Points +106%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2848 Points +88%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2650 Points +75%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2593 Points +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2105 Points +39%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1517 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
38 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
37 fps +23%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
34 fps +13%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
31 fps +3%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
30 fps
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +95%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +95%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
32 fps +52%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps +5%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps 0%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
27 fps +29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps 0%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps -10%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -33%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
26 fps +73%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps +47%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps +33%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps 0%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
19 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -26%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -42%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -54%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +50%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps +50%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +20%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -13%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.7 fps -13%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps 0%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.8 fps -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.5 fps -32%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.4 fps -42%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps -53%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.7 fps +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +37%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6.6 fps +12%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps -3%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
7 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.9 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -33%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
4.5 fps -43%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.4 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.7 fps +54%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2.7 fps +13%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.4 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2.1 fps -12%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.4 fps -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9 fps -31%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.4 fps -43%
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.4 fps -58%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps +59%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps +56%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
7.8 fps +24%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
6.3 fps
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -13%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps -16%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.6 fps +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps +40%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.2 fps +20%
Teclast P26T
Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash
1 fps
Teclast M50 HD
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.85 fps -15%
Blackview Tab 80
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -20%

Web surfing usually works quickly and smooth with the P26T. However, the browser tests don't reflect this, since the P26T always finishes last here.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=57, last 2 years)
84.8 Points +280%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
52.9 Points +137%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)
50.247 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
49.8 Points +123%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
47.753 Points +114%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
46.85 Points +110%
Average Allwinner A523 (22.3 - 26.9, n=2)
24.6 Points +10%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)
22.32 Points
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=54, last 2 years)
83.5 Points +221%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
58 Points +123%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
57 Points +119%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
53 Points +104%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)
52 Points +100%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
51 Points +96%
Average Allwinner A523 (26 - 30, n=2)
28 Points +8%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)
26 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=41, last 2 years)
121.7 Points +197%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
93 Points +127%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
93 Points +127%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
78 Points +90%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)
41 Points
Average Allwinner A523
41 Points 0%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=50, last 2 years)
78.2 runs/min +296%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
53.5 runs/min +171%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)
39.3 runs/min +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112)
38.16 runs/min +93%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
36.9 runs/min +87%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111)
34.43 runs/min +74%
Average Allwinner A523 (19.8 - 21.8, n=2)
20.8 runs/min +5%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)
19.75 runs/min
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=68, last 2 years)
23080 Points +290%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 120)
14279 Points +142%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
12681 Points +115%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)
12397 Points +110%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
11952 Points +102%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
11786 Points +99%
Average Allwinner A523 (5911 - 6314, n=2)
6113 Points +3%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)
5911 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Allwinner A523 (8641 - 8772, n=2)
8707 ms * -1%
Teclast P26T (Chrome 114.0.5735.60)
8641.2 ms *
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=57, last 2 years)
3274 ms * +62%
Blackview Tab 80 (Chrome 120)
3176.1 ms * +63%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111)
3075.1 ms * +64%
Teclast M50 HD (Chrome 120)
3053.2 ms * +65%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112)
2895.3 ms * +66%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE (chrome 116)
2650.1 ms * +69%

* ... smaller is better

The eMMC flash storage of the Teclast P26T is often encountered in this price class. It is not very fast and won't allow for short load times or high data throughput. 

Teclast P26TBlackview Tab 80Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3Teclast M50 HDSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022Xiaomi Redmi Pad SEAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
148%
177%
122%
94%
328%
113%
468%
Sequential Read 256KB
237.62
266.71
12%
277.2
17%
266.2
12%
249
5%
297.47
25%
283 ?(106.7 - 511, n=73)
19%
836 ?(163 - 3414, n=63, last 2 years)
252%
Sequential Write 256KB
137.55
235.98
72%
210.4
53%
192.3
40%
83
-40%
228.97
66%
192.9 ?(72.3 - 314, n=73)
40%
530 ?(78.2 - 2528, n=63, last 2 years)
285%
Random Read 4KB
63.08
65.11
3%
105.1
67%
70.4
12%
67.3
7%
102.41
62%
82.6 ?(8.63 - 247, n=73)
31%
164.2 ?(18.4 - 451, n=63, last 2 years)
160%
Random Write 4KB
11.69
70.74
505%
78.5
572%
61
422%
58.8
403%
146.92
1157%
53.9 ?(3.84 - 159.9, n=73)
361%
148.8 ?(8.23 - 503, n=63, last 2 years)
1173%

Games - PUBG Mobile comes close to the 30-FPS mark

When gaming, the Teclast P26T doesn't make a bad impression, particularly since the control via the touchscreen works well. But only graphically simple games such as Subway Surfers are displayed really smoothly. The brief drop you can see in its FPS chart below comes from opening up the menu and can therefore be ignored.

In more demanding games such as Asphalt 9 (in High graphics quality) or PUBG Mobile (HD/High setting), the P26T comes close to the 30 frames per second mark. However, there are also repeated significant drops in the frame rate with both games. Our impressions of the Asphalt 9 and PUBG Mobile games range between "stuttering" and "acceptable" overall.

We determine the game frame rates with our Gamebench test tool.

Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Teclast P26T; Asphalt 9: Legends; 4.4.0k: Ø25.8 (11-37)
Teclast P26T; PUBG Mobile; 3.0.0: Ø28.4 (17-31)
Teclast P26T; Subway Surfers; 3.23.1: Ø60.9 (29-62)

Emissions - A flat stereo sound from the Teclast P26T

Temperatures

The Teclast P26T hardly warms up during operation. On the surface, we measure a top value of 47.8 °C (118 °F) in the area of the cameras. But this value is only reached after the tablet was put under heavy load for an hour with the Burnout benchmark. In regular usage, the surface temperatures remain significantly lower than that.

The tablet is able to efficiently remove the heat of the Allwinner A523, as the Wild Life stress tests of 3DMark show. Even after the 20th run of the two test scenarios, the frame rates remain practically as high as during the beginning of the measurement.

Max. Load
 43.5 °C
110 F
28.5 °C
83 F
28.2 °C
83 F
 
 46.2 °C
115 F
29.5 °C
85 F
28.6 °C
83 F
 
 37.2 °C
99 F
29.8 °C
86 F
27.4 °C
81 F
 
Maximum: 46.2 °C = 115 F
Average: 33.2 °C = 92 F
28 °C
82 F
30.6 °C
87 F
43.3 °C
110 F
28 °C
82 F
30.6 °C
87 F
47.8 °C
118 F
27.8 °C
82 F
29.4 °C
85 F
36 °C
97 F
Maximum: 47.8 °C = 118 F
Average: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.1 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

00.20.40.70.91.11.31.51.722.22.42.62.83.13.33.53.73.94.1Tooltip
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.04 (3.03-3.05)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.52-2.56)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.14 (3.13-3.16)
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.54 (2.53-2.55)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.35 (4.34-4.36)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.5 (3.49-3.5)
Teclast P26T Mali-G57 MP1, A523, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.825 (0.817-0.835)
Blackview Tab 80 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.619 (0.55-0.676)
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 Mali-G52 MP2, T610, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø0.799 (0.789-0.809)
Teclast M50 HD Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.633 (0.547-0.721)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, T618, 32 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.117 (1.11-1.127)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.726 (0.72-0.741)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.52 (3.52-3.53)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
98.5 (1.11min - 1.127max) % +1%
Teclast P26T
97.8 (0.817min - 0.835max) %
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
97.5 (0.789min - 0.809max) % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
97.3 (0.72min - 0.741max) % -1%
Blackview Tab 80
81.3 (0.55min - 0.676max) % -17%
Teclast M50 HD
75.9 (0.547min - 0.721max) % -22%
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.6 (3.49min - 3.5max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
99.4 (4.34min - 4.36max) % 0%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
99.3 (3.13min - 3.16max) % 0%
Teclast M50 HD
99.3 (2.53min - 2.55max) % 0%
Teclast P26T
99.3 (3.03min - 3.05max) %
Blackview Tab 80
98.2 (2.52min - 2.56max) % -1%
Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
99.9 (3.52min - 3.53max) %

Legend

 
Teclast P26T Allwinner A523, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Blackview Tab 80 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 UNISOC T610, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Teclast M50 HD UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 UNISOC T618, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Teclast P26T
Teclast P26T

Speakers

The two speakers of the P26T are both placed on the right short side, so you will only get a stereo effect if you hold the tablet in portrait orientation. Overall, the sound mix with its non-existent bass is not very balanced, making any music sound flat. Voices, on the other hand, sound very clear.

You can connect external audio devices using the 3.5-mm audio port or Bluetooth 5.2. The P26T supports the AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, and SBC Bluetooth audio codecs.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.228.42530.324.53124.121.24031.4275037.332.66325.923.48019.518.810016.524.112513.729.216013.736.22009.239.32508.3453156.750.4400757.55008.860.86308.365.88008.965.8100010.767.812508.766.816009.170.420009.775.8250010.677.3315011.372.240001261.6500012.957.9630013.759.6800014.450.51000015.350.2125001647160001743SPL23.982.6N0.543.7median 10.7median 57.9Delta2.71136.437.128.23126.626.226.627.732.436.622.528.81733.125.532.921.234.919.141.5154914.755.113.761.711.367.414.767.716.271.316.573.314.377.412.174.211.674.211.171.713.669.621.470.924.872.72875.523.464.723.156.920.867.223.461.82253.233.584.41.561.4median 16.5median 67.44.48.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseTeclast P26TSamsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Teclast P26T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Management - A very short battery life and long charging time

Power Consumption

The Teclast tablet has a 6000-mAh battery that can be charged using the included 10-Watt charger. In our test, it takes 4:12 hours to completely recharge the tablet.

The power consumption of the P26T is inconspicuous with 1.3 watts during idle operation and 4.6 watts under load. But comparison devices such as the Blackview Tab 80 and Teclast M50 HD still run more efficiently.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1 / 1.3 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 4.6 / 8.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Teclast P26T
6000 mAh
Blackview Tab 80
7680 mAh
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3
5100 mAh
Teclast M50 HD
6000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022
7040 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE
8000 mAh
Power Consumption
26%
-53%
10%
-14%
-98%
Idle Minimum *
1
0.8
20%
1.9
-90%
1.2
-20%
1.4
-40%
0.63
37%
Idle Average *
1.3
1
23%
2.1
-62%
1.3
-0%
1.6
-23%
4.25
-227%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
1.5
12%
2.5
-47%
1.5
12%
2
-18%
4.34
-155%
Load Average *
4.6
3.2
30%
7.6
-65%
3.6
22%
4.2
9%
10.24
-123%
Load Maximum *
8.7
4.9
44%
9
-3%
5.5
37%
8.7
-0%
10.47
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)