Teclast P30T review – A very affordable tablet with good specs but weak performance
Comparison with possible competitors
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
75.9 % | 02/2024 | Teclast P30T A523, Mali-G57 MP1 | 444 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1280x800 | |
75.2 % | 02/2024 | Teclast P26T A523, Mali-G57 MP1 | 511 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1280x800 | |
81.2 % | 05/2023 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 477 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
80 % | 03/2023 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2 | 460 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 10.10" | 1920x1200 |
Case and specifications – Lightweight metal chassis
We recently took a look at the Teclast P26T, a tablet that aimed to attract consumers with a plastic chassis and a very low price. The Teclast P30T featured in this review is slightly more expensive. It already comes with Android 14 and a metal chassis, but uses the same SoC as the P26T.
The chassis is fairly sturdy, but you probably shouldn’t press too firmly on it. The seams between materials are clean and neat. And the Teclast P30T is a really light 10.1-inch tablet weighing 444 g (about 1 lb). The display bezel is wide, which makes the tablet’s design feel somewhat outdated. On the other hand, the bezel lets you hold the tablet easily and not worry about accidental inputs on the touchscreen. The only colourway available is Space Grey.
Teclast claims the devices has up to 10 GB of RAM, but don't get misled by this information. The P30T only has 4 GB of physical memory at its disposal, but instead allows you to create a file of up to 6 GB in the internal storage for use as virtual RAM. This is much slower than the dedicated memory and thus should only be considered a makeshift solution. Given the tablet’s relatively low performance, it probably also wouldn’t provide much benefit anyway.
The device has 128 GB of storage – a pretty good amount for the price. You can also expand the total storage capacity using the microSD card reader, which, in fact, is also relatively speedy. Unfortunately, we are unable to show you any relevant results because CPDT Benchmark refused to work on the tablet.
There is a 3.5 mm audio jack located on the top left corner of the tablet.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Tablet (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Teclast P30T (Angelbird V60) | |
Teclast P26T (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Angelbird V60) |
Connectivity, software and operation – Android 14 on the Teclast tablet
You can only use Wi-Fi to access the Internet because the tablet doesn’t have cellular connectivity. The manufacturer claims the product has Wi-Fi 6, something which the SoC reported to our hardware analysis app as well. However, this isn’t reflected in the results of our tests conducted with our reference router (Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000). The Teclast P30T reach data transfer speeds of around 280 to 370 Mbit/s, which correspond exactly to what we usually see on tablets with Wi-Fi 5.
The company says the P30T supports the very latest Bluetooth 5.4. But we have doubts about this as well and think it’s more likely that the device actually uses Bluetooth 5.2 instead.
The tablet isn’t able to identify location using a satellite network, but can approximate it with the help of Google Location Services, which use a database of Wi-Fi networks to achieve this.
The software is based on Android 14. Thankfully, Teclast has also decided to deliver a stock Android system and not preload any third-party apps. Another good thing is that the tablet supports Widevine L1, meaning you can watch contents from major streaming services in HD. The company hasn’t given any update promise. Users can only hope to get security and software patches. At the time of writing, the last security update was dated November 2023 and thus already somewhat older.
The touchscreen has a maximum touch sampling rate of 120Hz. It is reliable to use, but there are definitely tablets that are more responsive to inputs. There isn’t a fingerprint scanner on board. For biometric authentication, you can only use 2D face recognition via the front camera. This works accurately and reliably in good lighting conditions, though the system already start struggling when there is a bit of shadow.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast P30T | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Teclast P26T | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Teclast P30T | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Teclast P26T |
Cameras – More for use at a pinch
Teclast has fitted two cameras on the back, though only one of them is actually used for taking photos. The other camera only helps to provide extra data for background blur when you're shooting in portrait mode.
The main camera has a resolution of just five megapixels and produces rather low-res photos with little detail. In good lighting conditions, photos turn out serviceable as snapshots, as long as there isn’t too much difference in brightness. Otherwise, bright areas are going to be overexposed, whilst dark areas will have little detail.
Similarly, the camera is more for use at a pinch when there is very little light and lots of contrast. It captured hardly any additional details outside the direct circle of light in our low-light test shot. In our photography lab with bright studio lighting, images ended up looking grainy with fine details that you can barely make out. Images also have a visible red tint. The camera stopped reproducing any picture contents at just 1 lux.
With a paltry resolution of two megapixels, the front camera likewise produces rather poor-quality selfies – and does so only in good lighting.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera: plantMain camera: surroundingsMain camera: low-lightDisplay – Low resolution, but properly bright
The display has a resolution of 1,280 x 800. As a result, given its relatively large 10.1-inch size, you’ll be able to see obvious differences in image quality between this panel and higher-resolution screens: images appear less sharp, and diagonal edges look visibly jagged upon closer inspection.
The display also looks somewhat dull and thus doesn’t offer good contrast already at first glance. This is something we confirmed in our tests performed using a spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software. The results show that grey shades carry a noticeable green tint and intense colour hues look too washed out.
That said, at least the screen has decent brightness for a tablet in this price bracket: we measured an average peak brightness of 310 cd/m². This is roughly on par with other devices and much better than on the Teclast P26T. Nonetheless, the screen is probably still too dark to be used outdoors on a bright day.
We didn’t detect any PWM at minimum brightness setting.
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 21 cd/m²
Contrast: 795:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
79.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.134
Teclast P30T IPS, 1280x800, 10.10 | Teclast P26T IPS, 1280x800, 10.10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.40 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -18% | -23% | 17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.5 ? | 60.2 ? -49% | 53.1 ? -31% | 42 ? -4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.5 ? | 25.7 ? 13% | 33.6 ? -14% | 18.4 ? 38% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -24% | -2% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 318 | 248 -22% | 322 1% | 343 8% |
Brightness | 310 | 236 -24% | 303 -2% | 332 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 81 -2% | 89 7% | 94 13% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.4 -0% | 0.45 -13% | 0.31 22% |
Contrast | 795 | 620 -22% | 716 -10% | 1106 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.02 | 8.62 -43% | 7.02 -17% | 5.9 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.51 | 17.81 -15% | 10.38 33% | 11.2 28% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 10.1 -63% | 7.1 -15% | 7.9 -27% |
Gamma | 2.134 103% | 2.438 90% | 2.179 101% | 2.184 101% |
CCT | 7517 86% | 10183 64% | 8730 74% | 9198 71% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -21% /
-23% | -13% /
-6% | 15% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.1 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise | |
↘ 16.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance, emissions and battery life – The SoC as bottleneck
As far as performance goes, you shouldn't expect too much from the budget tablet. It uses the same Allwinner A523 SoC found in the Teclast P26T. This chip needs to get by with eight Cortex-A55 cores, which are usually used in the energy-efficient section of a processor. In addition, the SoC is manufactured using the dated 22 nm process, meaning it has low power efficiency.
It's thus not uncommon to experience occasional pauses, even when you’re just doing everyday tasks or using the menus. What’s more, the device’s benchmark results are markedly worse than those from similarly priced tablets made by other companies. Graphics performance is also very poor. The storage components (with the already slow eMMC flash) are evidently held back even more by the SoC’s memory controller. Consequently, users end up with a fairly slow-responding system with long load times.
In view of the SoC’s low performance, it comes as a surprise that chassis temperatures reached as high as 40.5°C (104.9°F) during our testing. Though this is not a critical level, you can still feel it. At least the SoC can maintain its performance under prolonged load: the 3DMark stress tests revealed only minor performance losses after 20 runs of the benchmark.
The tablet is equipped with two speakers, meaning it is able to offer slight stereo effect. They can get quite loud, but sound very shrill – great for voices and vocals, but bad for the fullness of the sound due to a lack of bass. Therefore, the sound system is intended more to let you give music tracks a quick listen. To enjoy music to the fullest, you should connect speakers or a pair of headphones to the device via Bluetooth or the 3.5 mm audio jack. A whole host of codecs are available for wireless audio, including standard ones like SBC and AAC as well as hi-res options like LDAC and the open-source Opus.
The battery is a good size at 6,000 mAh. But the SoC causes problems related to battery life because of its outdated manufacturing process: we only managed to get 7h 33min of runtime from the tablet in our Wi-Fi test. This is nearly just half as long as what the Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 or Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 is capable of.
Those who mainly use the P30T at home will probably have a power outlet around them at all times, but the tablet needs to be charged more often than other devices. Furthermore, it takes a really long time to recharge the battery: you should set aside more than four hours for a full charge.
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Teclast P30T | |
Average Allwinner A523 (5224 - 5749, n=2) | |
Teclast P26T |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast P30T | |
Average Allwinner A523 (5911 - 6314, n=2) | |
Teclast P26T |
Teclast P30T | Teclast P26T | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | 66% | 138% | 85% | 402% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 230.3 | 237.62 3% | 249 8% | 277.2 20% | 283 ? 23% | 850 ? 269% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 144.9 | 137.55 -5% | 83 -43% | 210.4 45% | 193 ? 33% | 532 ? 267% |
Random Read 4KB | 72.6 | 63.08 -13% | 67.3 -7% | 105.1 45% | 82.4 ? 13% | 167 ? 130% |
Random Write 4KB | 14.5 | 11.69 -19% | 58.8 306% | 78.5 441% | 54 ? 272% | 150.8 ? 940% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
Speakers
Teclast P30T audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery life
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 1764, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Teclast P30T | |
Teclast P26T |
Pros
Cons
Verdict – Cheap, but not always a joy to use
The Teclast P30T is an entry-level tablet you can sometimes get for less than €100 (US$108). For the money, it offers a lightweight metal chassis, a reasonably bright display without PWM, and stock Android 14 with Widevine certification.
That said, the low display resolution, the weak CPU, GPU and memory performance, and the uncertainties surrounding software updates marred our enjoyment of the budget tablet.
The cameras are more of a stopgap measure and are barely usable in many situations if you wish to take decent photos. The vaguely specified RAM size and the maybe correct information about the supported Wi-Fi and Bluetooth version don’t inspire confidence either. The SoC is not very energy-efficient and can only get short runtime out of the huge battery.
That is a shame because, with their marginally more expensive M and T series devices, Teclast has proven it’s possible to offer great specs for little money. The Teclast P30T too manages to stand out in this respect by offering high storage capacity and a microSD slot.
The Teclast P30T has its problems, but it may still be a compelling product with a budget price tag if you intend to use the tablet mostly at home and want a lot of storage.
The Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 features a metal chassis as well, but you’ll need to fork out a small premium for it. Another example of a cheap tablet is the Blackview Tab 80, which even boasts LTE capability.
Price and availability
Visit the Teclast P30T's product page for more information on availability and pricing. You can also find the tablet for as low as US$80 from retailers like Walmart.
Teclast P30T
-
02/13/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.