Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPad 10 review - Anniversary tablet as slimmed down version of the iPad Air

iPad Air Light. The new iPad of the 10th generation offers a reworked design that is identical to that of the current iPad Air. While it also shares many other characteristics of the sibling model, there are also some technical compromises. However, this still results in a hefty price increase compared to the predecessor.

At this point the Apple iPad of 2022 represents its 10th generation, celebrating its anniversary. For this occasion, Apple treats the most affordable iPad with a modern design and also increases the price by a hefty amount. Technically, it is a mix of the iPad 9 and iPad Air 4.

The Apple tablet is available in two storage versions. The smaller version offers 64 GB for 579 Euros (~$603) and the larger, 256 GB for 779 Euros (~$812). The optional mobile communication module costs an additional 200 Euros (~$208). Find out in this test, whether the most recent Apple tablet is worth its price, what differentiates it from the other models, and what the best alternatives are.

Apple iPad 10 (iPad Series)
Processor
Apple A14 Bionic 6 x 1.8 - 3.1 GHz, Firestorm / Icestorm
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.90 inch 4.3:3, 2360 x 1640 pixel 264 PPI, capacitive, Liquid Retina, IPS, supports Apple Pencil Gen. 1, fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, True Tone, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB SSD, 64 GB 
, 50.28 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: digital compass, Touch ID, three‐axis gyro, accelerometer, barometer
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7 x 248.6 x 179.5 ( = 0.28 x 9.79 x 7.07 in)
Battery
28.93 Wh, 7606 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 3.8 V, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iPadOS 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8, Smart HDR 3, 5P), 4k video
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (ultra wide, 122°, f/2.4), 1080p video
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-C cable (1 m), 20W charger, sticker, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
477 g ( = 16.83 oz / 1.05 pounds), Power Supply: 72 g ( = 2.54 oz / 0.16 pounds)
Price
579 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.6 %
11/2022
Apple iPad 10
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
477 g7 mm10.90"2360x1640
91.7 %
03/2022
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
461 g6.1 mm10.90"2360x1640
88.5 %
10/2021
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
487 g7.5 mm10.20"2160x1620
85.8 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
608 g6.3 mm12.40"2560x1600
88.7 %
11/2021
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650
515 g6.85 mm11.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
11/2022
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Kompanio 1300T, Mali-G77 MP9
480 g6.8 mm11.20"2560x1536

Case - Recycled aluminum in many colors

All the color versions of the iPad 2022 (Source: Apple)
All the color versions of the iPad 2022

The Apple iPad 10 inherited the case design of the iPad Air, which was first introduced in 2020. The iPad 10 is available in silver, blue, rosé, and yellow color. The camera sticks out slightly from the aluminum unibody, so the tablet wobbles when you place it on a flat surface.

The quality of the workmanship is excellent. Due to the unibody design, there are hardly any gaps, and the material transitions are tight and even. The aluminum surface is prone to show fingerprints but very comfortable to hold. Compared to the current iPad Air, the iPad 10 is slightly larger in all dimensions, despite having the same-size panel.

The battery of the tablet is built in and cannot be replaced by the user. There is no certified protection against dust or water. Compared to the iPad 9, the efficiency was improved, the amount of plastic in the packaging was further reduced, and recycled gold and copper was used for the first time. In terms of sustainability, Apple publishes all the details in a detailed report.

Touch ID in der Powertaste

Size Comparison

284.8 mm / 11.2 inch 185 mm / 7.28 inch 6.3 mm / 0.248 inch 608 g1.34 lbs263.66 mm / 10.4 inch 166.67 mm / 6.56 inch 6.8 mm / 0.2677 inch 480 g1.058 lbs254.69 mm / 10 inch 166.25 mm / 6.55 inch 6.85 mm / 0.2697 inch 515 g1.135 lbs250.6 mm / 9.87 inch 174.1 mm / 6.85 inch 7.5 mm / 0.2953 inch 487 g1.074 lbs248.6 mm / 9.79 inch 179.5 mm / 7.07 inch 7 mm / 0.2756 inch 477 g1.052 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 inch 178.5 mm / 7.03 inch 6.1 mm / 0.2402 inch 461 g1.016 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Equipment - iPad 10 for the first time with USB-C

While the iPad 9 still included a Lightning port, the iPad 10 now offers USB-C. This makes sense, considering the EU regulation proscribing USB-C as the unified connection standard (we report), but the 1st generation of the Apple Pencil, which is compatible with the iPad, still uses the old connection. So those who want to recharge the pen directly from the tablet or still don't have a Lightning cable have to invest in an additional adapter for 10 Euros (~$10). With another corresponding adapter, the port can also be used for wired image output.

In terms of storage equipment, there is a version with 64 and a larger version with 256 GB. Those who require more storage have to use the cloud or can connect external data storage via the USB port.

The optional Magic Keyboard Folio can be connected via the Smart Connector. The Touch ID is in the power button.

Top: 2 x speakers, Power/Touch ID
Top: 2 x speakers, Power/Touch ID
Left: Smart Connector
Left: Smart Connector
Right: volume
Right: volume
Bottom: speaker, USB, speaker
Bottom: speaker, USB, speaker

Software - iPadOS 16.1 with a long period of updates

The Apple iPad 10 is delivered with iPadOS 16.1, which has already received a bug fix update to version 16.1.1 during our test. But in contrast to the Pro models, the new Stage Manager cannot be used here.

Except for its own services and apps, Apple doesn't install any other programs on the iPad. Usually, you can expect updates for around five years for the iPad, starting from the date of its introduction. However, there is no official announcement from Apple about this.

Communication and GNSS - Wi-Fi 6 and optional 5G for the iPad 2022

The Apple iPad 10 is able to connect to 2.4 and 5.0-GHz networks via dual-band WLAN. In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the transfer speeds turn out fairly constant and correspond to the advertised Wi-Fi 6 standard. The range is very good.

Optionally, you can also get a model with a 5G modem that can either be equipped with a Nano-SIM or eSIM. It supports a wide selection of frequency bands as well as GNSS.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 (829min - 888max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
777 (381min - 863max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
630 (597min - 669max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
587 (290min - 624max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
827 (708min - 899max) MBit/s
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
767 (747min - 777max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
655 (601min - 674max) MBit/s
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
485 (191min - 554max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
921 (464min - 934max) MBit/s +24%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
769 (744min - 780max) MBit/s +4%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
741 (621min - 759max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
959 (486min - 977max) MBit/s +18%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
883 (863min - 903max) MBit/s +8%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
816 (764min - 851max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø741 (621-759)
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø903 (464-934)
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (764-851)
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, ARM Mali-G77 MP9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø883 (863-903)

The WLAN model doesn't support locating its position via GNSS. Instead, the Apple tablet uses the WLAN, the digital compass, and iBeacon micro-locating to determine its own position. However, this is not sufficient for navigation tasks or recording routes.

GNSS test route: around the lake
GNSS test route: around the lake
GNSS test route: turning loop
GNSS test route: turning loop
GNSS test route: overview
GNSS test route: overview

Cameras - Good standard for the home office

Selfie taken with the iPad 10
Selfie taken with the iPad 10

The front camera of the Apple iPad (2022) uses a 12-MP ultra-wide angle lens and supports the Follow mode for video conferencing. With this, the camera automatically adjusts the image angle to keep one or more persons in the center of the image. With sufficient light, the recordings are fairly good. You can record videos in Full HD resolution at up to 60 frames per second.

The main camera on the back also offers a 12-MP resolution, but it can use Smart HDR 3 and an auto focus with Focus Pixels. In everyday photography, the recordings offer a good color reproduction with decent image capturing capabilities, but particular in terms of depth, they show some slight noise fairly early on. While this is definitely not a top performance, it is completely sufficient for documentation purposes.

The main camera is able to record videos in Ultra HD at up to 60 FPS.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkamera5-fach ZoomLow-Light

Under controlled light conditions, our experiences from everyday photography are confirmed. The recording performance of the ColorChecker chart is relatively natural, only showing some slight DeltaE deviations without any coarse color inversions. Only dark green is brightened slightly too much.

The test chart shows good details in the center that reach all the way to the edge areas, although it is struggling with a slight loss in contrast there.

ColorChecker
3.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad 10: 4.75 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 9.09 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.3 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad 10: 46.96 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92.93 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - With the keyboard, it gets very expensive

A 20-Watt charger is included with the iPad.
A 20-Watt charger is included with the iPad.

The box of the 10th generation Apple iPad includes a USB-C cable and a modular 20-Watt charger.

The manufacturer warranty is only 12 months, but any vender warranty is not impacted by this. Optionally, you can also purchase Apple Care+ for the iPad, which lasts for two years at a cost of 79 Euros (~$82) or about 4 Euros (~$4) on a monthly basis. In addition to the expert support, you can get an unlimited amount of repairs during this time, as long as the damage was unintended. However, for each repair you also have to pay a universal service charge of 49 Euros (~$51) in the case of the iPad or 29 Euros (~$30) for the pen or keyboard.

Optionally, you can also purchase the Apple Pencil (Gen. 1 for 119 Euros, ~$124), Smart Folios in the corresponding case colors (for 99 Euros, ~$103 each) or the Magic Keyboard Folio (for 299 Euros, ~$312). Those who decide for the Pencil also have to purchase the corresponding USB adapter for this, in order to be able to connect the pen with the Apple tablet at all.

Input Devices and Operation - iPad 10 with Touch ID

The capacitive touchscreen of the Apple iPad 2022 responds to inputs quickly and reliably. As in the iPad 9, there is a slight distance between the panel and the front glass. So those who had hoped to get a fully laminated display will be disappointed. However, this doesn't impact the operation, and only those using the Pencil will have to get used to the feeling of the pen hovering slightly above the display contents. 

The keyboard layout from Apple is installed as the onscreen keyboard, but you can also replace this by any other keyboard from the App Store. Optionally, you can also purchase an external keyboard. Unfortunately, we haven't been able to test this until now.

A fingerprint scanner (Touch ID) in the power key provides biometric security. Although this recognizes the stored fingerprints very reliably, it doesn't belong to the fastest of its kind.

Display - IPS panel with 60 Hz for the iPad 10.9

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The size of the IPS display of the Apple iPad has increased to 10.9 inch (27.7 cm) in the diagonal, offering 2360 x 1640 pixels. While nominally, this corresponds to the panel in the iPad Air, it isn't laminated fully, doesn't cover the DCI-P3 color space, and also doesn't offer an antireflective layer.

The brightness of the LCD is supposed to reach 500 Nits. However, the iPad 10 doesn't quite reach this value in our measurements. With a full white display and activated brightness sensor, the tablet reaches 468 cd/m² on average. With an even distribution of light and dark areas (APL18), the brightness turns out only minimally higher, reaching 474 cd/m². Those who like to adjust the brightness manually will even get slightly more, since up to 492 cd/m² are then possible.

The black value is slightly elevated but still sufficient for a good contrast ratio. We do not notice any pulse-width modulation (PWM). As the slow-motion observation through a microscope shows, temporal dithering is also not used.

480
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
468
cd/m²
467
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
456
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Liquid Retina tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 489 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 468.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 467 cd/m²
Contrast: 953:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.21
Apple iPad 10
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.90
Apple iPad 2021
IPS, 2160x1620, 10.20
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.40
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
IPS, 2560x1600, 11.00
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
OLED, 2560x1536, 11.20
Screen
16%
-3%
6%
6%
1%
Brightness middle
467
529
13%
507
9%
619
33%
497
6%
631
35%
Brightness
468
490
5%
491
5%
593
27%
475
1%
633
35%
Brightness Distribution
92
86
-7%
90
-2%
91
-1%
89
-3%
91
-1%
Black Level *
0.49
0.37
24%
0.5
-2%
0.22
55%
0.42
14%
Contrast
953
1430
50%
1014
6%
2814
195%
1183
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.35
4%
1.7
-21%
2.6
-86%
1.4
-0%
1.7
-21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.3
2.45
26%
3.9
-18%
6.6
-100%
3
9%
4.2
-27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.1
9%
2.4
-4%
4
-74%
2.3
-0%
2.6
-13%
Gamma
2.21 100%
2.183 101%
2.25 98%
2.17 101%
2.25 98%
2.23 99%
CCT
6852 95%
6939 94%
6923 94%
6973 93%
6744 96%
6496 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The color analysis with the photo spectrometer and CalMAN software attests the Apple iPad 10.9 with a good display performance. We achieve the most natural results with the True Tone function deactivated, but we still notice a slightly warm white balance in bright gray tones even then. Almost all the deviations in the colors are not noticeable by the human eye alone. The only exception is cyan, but even that isn't even close to any distortion and not noticeable in everyday operation.

Grayscale (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Grayscale (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Colors (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Colors (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Color Space (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Color Space (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Saturation (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)
Saturation (True Tone deactivated, sRGB color target space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.08 ms rise
↘ 12.23 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.08 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Outdoors, the Apple iPad makes a decent impression. On cloudy days, the contents can usually be read easily. However, as soon as things get brighter, the reflections on the display surface and low brightness reserves can make reading the display more difficult.

Outdoors
Outdoors
On an overcast day
On an overcast day

The viewing angle stability of the Apple tablet is really good. Despite the distance between the front glass and panel, we do not notice any ghosting effects. There also aren't any of the typical IPS light halos in black areas. However, the brightness drops slightly from steep viewing angles.

Performance - Apple tablet with A14 SoC

The Apple iPad 10 uses the in-house A14 SoC, which was used for the first time in the iPad Air 2020. It has access to 4 GB of working memory.

The benchmarks show a mixed picture. While the results are slightly aboveaverage in Geekbench, the system benchmarks turn out minimally lower. However, in everyday operation you would not notice either one or the other, and the SoC runs with a high performance, ensuring smooth system operation.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
1719 Points +9%
Apple iPad 10
1580 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic (1326 - 1604, n=6)
1549 Points -2%
Apple iPad 2021
1328 Points -16%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
1019 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
773 Points -51%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
656 Points -58%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
7034 Points +75%
Apple iPad 10
4027 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic (3476 - 4334, n=6)
4019 Points 0%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
3317 Points -18%
Apple iPad 2021
3235 Points -20%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
2669 Points -34%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
1885 Points -53%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
1040908 Points +51%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (691084 - 776812, n=3)
725392 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
704209 Points +2%
Apple iPad 10
691084 Points
Apple iPad 2021
622382 Points -10%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
607789 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=52, last 2 years)
453858 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
356422 Points -48%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
1266 Points +28%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (987 - 1022, n=4)
1002 Points +2%
Apple iPad 10
987 Points
Apple iPad 2021
842 Points -15%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
780 Points -21%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
733 Points -26%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1585, n=51, last 2 years)
672 Points -32%
Geekbench ML
TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Average of class Tablet (851 - 1245, n=2, last 2 years)
1048 Points +23%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
945 Points +11%
Apple iPad 10
851 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic ()
851 Points 0%
TensorFlow Lite GPU 0.5
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
2868 Points +44%
Average of class Tablet (1991 - 3383, n=2, last 2 years)
2687 Points +35%
Apple iPad 10
1991 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic ()
1991 Points 0%
TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML 0.5
Average of class Tablet (2496 - 3150, n=2, last 2 years)
2823 Points +13%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
2743 Points +10%
Apple iPad 10
2496 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic ()
2496 Points 0%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10
Storage Write
Average of class Tablet (181 - 1112, n=7, last 2 years)
619 MB/s +242%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
354 MB/s +96%
Apple iPad 10
181 MB/s
Average Apple A14 Bionic ()
181 MB/s 0%
Storage Read
Average of class Tablet (269 - 905, n=7, last 2 years)
673 MB/s +41%
Apple iPad 10
477 MB/s
Average Apple A14 Bionic ()
477 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
269 MB/s -44%

Legend

 
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic, Apple A14 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Apple iPad 2021 Apple A13 Bionic, Apple A13 Bionic GPU, 64 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, ARM Mali-G77 MP9, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

The Apple A14 GPU integrated in the SoC handles the graphics computations, ensuring a very high performance and easily leaving the Android competitors behind. On the other hand, it is still surpassed by the iPad Air with the M1 processor. 

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
4144 Points +95%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2124 Points
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1872 Points -12%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1235 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1230 Points -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
334 Points -84%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
4913 Points +118%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
2250 Points
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
1992 Points -11%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1253 Points -44%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1228 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
330 Points -85%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
18309 Points +114%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
8539 Points
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
7858 Points -8%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4333 Points -49%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4290 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1099 Points -87%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +88%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
44 fps -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
557 fps +76%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
317 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
307 fps -3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
229 fps -28%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
184 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
55 fps -83%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +35%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps 0%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
317 fps +85%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
171 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
167 fps -2%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
137 fps -20%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +3%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
58 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
57 fps -2%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -14%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps -72%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
229 fps +91%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
120 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
110 fps -8%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -20%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
32 fps -73%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +33%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
45 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
43 fps -4%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -31%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.8 fps -78%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
153.5 fps +105%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
75 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
69 fps -8%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -23%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +76%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
35 fps +3%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
34 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -38%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.7 fps -80%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60.9 fps +90%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
32 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
31 fps -3%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -28%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.3 fps -77%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
60 fps +28%
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
50 fps +6%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
47 fps
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -30%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -79%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
149 fps +59%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
94 fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
82 fps -13%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -36%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -43%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps -80%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 64 GB SSD
6745 Points +110%
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
3205 Points
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
2965 Points -7%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2527 Points -21%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Native
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39.67 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Vulkan Medium Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45.77 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Native
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30.29 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / OpenGL Medium Offscreen
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Mali-G77 MP9, Kompanio 1300T, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43.92 fps
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Metal Medium Offscreen
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
156.38 (90.17min - 224.77max) fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
153 (86.52min - 283.45max) fps -2%
Basemark GPU 1.2 / Metal Medium Native
Apple iPad 10
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD
96.23 (63.62min - 147.36max) fps
Apple iPad 2021
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
94.9 (56.04min - 140.57max) fps -1%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø25.6 (14.6-39.6)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø67.4 (40.5-82.4)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø27.2 (15.5-39)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø96 (59.5-120.1)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 1.0.1 : Ø13.3 (10-20.5)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 1.0.1 : Ø33.6 (26.6-45.3)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.1 : Ø10.5 (8.56-17.2)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.1 : Ø36.6 (31-48.7)

Browsing the world wide web is fast with the iPad 10, which is also reflected in the benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
184.3 Points +3%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
178.932 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic (158.2 - 178.9, n=6)
163.7 Points -9%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
142.2 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 236, n=59, last 2 years)
84.9 Points -53%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
80 Points -55%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
64.891 Points -64%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
55.3 Points -69%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
147 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic ()
147 Points 0%
Average of class Tablet (21 - 227, n=57, last 2 years)
85.7 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
63 Points -57%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
254 Points +19%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
214 Points
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
202 Points -6%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (191 - 214, n=6)
196.3 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
121 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 342, n=42, last 2 years)
120.7 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
83 Points -61%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
75 Points -65%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
272 runs/min
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
255 runs/min -6%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (188 - 272, n=6)
207 runs/min -24%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
171 runs/min -37%
Average of class Tablet (14.7 - 376, n=52, last 2 years)
77.2 runs/min -72%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
68.9 runs/min -75%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
48.9 runs/min -82%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
43.09 runs/min -84%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
66974 Points +12%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
59963 Points
Average Apple A14 Bionic (55710 - 59963, n=6)
58132 Points -3%
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
47288 Points -21%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
30367 Points -49%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
28601 Points -52%
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
17823 Points -70%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (451 - 34733, n=59, last 2 years)
3209 ms * -487%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91)
2403 ms * -339%
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 (Chrome 107.0.5304.105)
1502.4 ms * -175%
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1447 ms * -165%
Apple iPad 10 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
547 ms *
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15)
545 ms * -0%
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15)
499 ms * +9%
Average Apple A14 Bionic (460 - 547, n=6)
477 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Gaming - A lot of power

Unfortunately, our partner GameBench doesn't support the current iPadOS at the time of this test yet, so that we are unable to present any results to you here.

However, the Apple A14 offers more than sufficient performance to display all the usual games at high detail settings, without having to limit the frame rates at all. Only in Genshin Impact, which is set to the highest quality levels at up to 60 FPS, we noticed the occasional small stutter.

Due to its weight, the tablet can become a bit heavy to hold in the hands in the long run, but it also offers a comfortably large display area and decent speakers.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

Emissions - Only small losses in performance under load

Temperature

The Apple iPad 10 warms up noticeably already during idle operation, but this never becomes uncomfortable. Under load, some parts can even become significantly warmer. However, the temperatures always remain below the 37-ºC mark (99 ºF). 

In the 3DMark stress test, the performance already drops slightly within the first 4 runs, although it remains stable afterwards. At around 14%, this performance drop turns out relatively small, and even then, the Apple tablet generates around 60% more frames per second than the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro with the Snapdragon 870.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø42.4 (41.9-48.6)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.5 (25.4-25.6)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø11.8 (11.6-13.5)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø7.36 (7.35-7.37)
Apple iPad 10 A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 64 GB SSD; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø43.4 (42.4-51.8)
Max. Load
 31 °C
88 F
34.3 °C
94 F
35.1 °C
95 F
 
 32.3 °C
90 F
31.6 °C
89 F
33 °C
91 F
 
 32.1 °C
90 F
33.9 °C
93 F
31.1 °C
88 F
 
Maximum: 35.1 °C = 95 F
Average: 32.7 °C = 91 F
36.9 °C
98 F
36.8 °C
98 F
33.9 °C
93 F
33.1 °C
92 F
33.5 °C
92 F
32 °C
90 F
32.8 °C
91 F
32.9 °C
91 F
31.7 °C
89 F
Maximum: 36.9 °C = 98 F
Average: 33.7 °C = 93 F
Power Supply (max.)  34 °C = 93 F | Room Temperature 21.1 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

Speakers

The Apple iPad 10 has two speakers on each short side, which produce a decent volume, although the high tones are slightly too present. In everyday operation, the offered performance is easily sufficient to listen to a bit of music or watch a movie at medium volume.

The USB-C port also allows you to connect wired headphones or speakers. For wireless listening, Bluetooth 5.2 is available, but the tablet only supports the SBC and AAC audio codecs.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.539.52526.327.43123.723.54035.926.1503631.86324.924.68020.424.910018.530.812516.938.516017.951.12001652.925014.154.231512.258.140013.358.350010.965.863012.364.580012.168.3100012.567.5125011.869.5160011.971.6200012.474.2250012.875315013.174.740001376.3500013.275.8630013.670.4800013.670.51000013.759.4125001459.41600013.851.5SPL2584.6N0.658.9median 13.2median 65.8Delta1.68.637.541.326.329.523.725.135.928.33639.724.925.120.426.818.53916.947.517.959.5166114.165.412.265.513.363.810.971.712.375.212.17712.581.111.879.211.975.312.477.612.87613.171.31374.413.273.713.667.313.669.113.769.31464.813.851.62587.50.673.2median 13.2median 71.31.66.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad 10Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Management - iPad 10 with a smaller battery

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Apple iPad 10 during idle operation is slightly higher than that of the iPad 2021, but on the other hand, the newer model is more efficient under load. What is surprisingly high is the power consumption when it is in Standby mode.

The battery of the iPad 10 is smaller than that of last year's model. This might be due to the case design, since the iPad Air has a battery with a similar capacity. In our test, it takes around 2 hours and 45 minutes to completely recharge the battery.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.47 / 0.17 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.34 / 7.78 / 7.89 Watt
Load midlight 9.05 / 9.98 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
 mAh
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
8200 mAh
Power Consumption
-11%
-2%
14%
23%
-0%
Idle Minimum *
1.34
1.65
-23%
1.3
3%
1.06
21%
1.14
15%
3
-124%
Idle Average *
7.78
8.1
-4%
7.5
4%
6.25
20%
4.3
45%
4.21
46%
Idle Maximum *
7.89
9.4
-19%
7.58
4%
6.3
20%
4.31
45%
4.3
46%
Load Average *
9.05
9.5
-5%
10.03
-11%
8.76
3%
8.09
11%
6.8
25%
Load Maximum *
9.98
10.4
-4%
10.91
-9%
9.54
4%
10.32
-3%
9.5
5%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic: Ø7.3 (2.93-13.3)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G: Ø5.35 (1.849-9.44)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112Tooltip
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10-12.6)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.62 (4.02-8.98)
Apple iPad 10 Apple A14 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.05 (3.02-3.16)
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.934 (1.897-2.33)

Battery Life

The battery life of the Apple tablet is at a good level, although it places last in our comparison. Our WLAN test measures realistic results and ensures comparable values due to the display brightness adjustment to 150 cd/m². At almost 11 hours, the iPad 10 lasts slightly longer than what Apple has specified, but all the competitors without exception have larger batteries, with most of them reaching a longer battery life. Only the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro is an exception in this regard.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
28h 49min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 16.1)
10h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 20min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 11min
Apple iPad 10
7606 mAh
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
 mAh
Apple iPad 2021
8686 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G
10090 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro
8600 mAh
Lenovo Tab P11 Pro Gen 2
8200 mAh
Battery Runtime
14%
28%
63%
47%
5%
Reader / Idle
1729
2292
33%
2485
44%
3013
74%
1016
-41%
H.264
740
898
21%
1249
69%
1009
36%
728
-2%
WiFi v1.3
647
646
0%
805
24%
1020
58%
921
42%
564
-13%
Load
191
245
28%
253
32%
342
79%
255
34%
337
76%

Pros

+ attractive design and workmanship
+ fast SoC
+ flicker-free IPS panel
+ long period of updates

Cons

- expensive accessories
- only a 60-Hz display
- only USB 2.0
- few Bluetooth audio codecs supported

Verdict - Strong technology, but expensive

Testing the Apple iPad 10
Testing the Apple iPad 10

The introduction of the iPad 10 could have given a reason to rejoice, but unfortunately Apple put a damper on this with a hefty price increase compared to the predecessor. The largest progress of the iPad lies in the design, which now resembles that of the iPad Air.

Those who decide for the iPad 10 will get a fast tablet with an accurate display, good battery life, and optional 5G and will probably be very satisfied with it. However, the technological progress isn't as large as you might expect from the price increase.

The Apple iPad from 2022 demands a hefty price premium, but the technology is seamless.

The iPad continues to use a display that isn't fully laminated. While this is probably a plus in terms of repairability, it still feels a bit strange, particularly when using a pen and it appears to hover above the display. You also have to purchase an additional adapter for the pen to be able to connect it to the tablet at all. Although the display is flicker free, the brightness is at a similar level as that of the iPad 9 and the refresh rate is only 60 Hz.

Those who want to own an affordable iPad and don't mind the old design should still get last year's model. Particularly if you also need to purchase some Apple accessories, you can easily save several hundred Euros in this way, without any noticeable compromise. The battery life of that model is even better.

Other powerful alternatives are the Galaxy Tab S7 FE or the Lenovo Tab P11 Pro, which are not only more affordable but also include the corresponding input pen directly.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and Availability

All the storage and color versions of the iPad 10 are available from Apple directly starting from $449, but they might be more affordable at Amazon, for example.

Apple iPad 10 - 11/24/2022 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 65%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 91%
Battery
89%
Display
88%
Games Performance
63 / 78 → 81%
Application Performance
89 / 92 → 96%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 91 → 85%
Camera
52 / 85 → 61%
Average
79%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Apple iPad 10 review - Anniversary tablet as slimmed down version of the iPad Air
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-11-25 (Update: 2022-11-25)