Samsung Galaxy S22+ smartphone review: The big version of the Galaxy S22

Bigger benefits. The plus (+) in the product name suggests additional features, and the Samsung Galaxy S22+ delivers as ordered. It offers all the features that distinguish the renowned Galaxy S22 but goes one step further, especially in terms of display and battery.

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Jacob Fisher), Published 05/10/2022 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Samsung traditionally makes its flagship smartphones in the Galaxy S series broadly available so that they appeal to the widest possible range of buyers. 2022 is no exception. At the top is the 6.8-inch Galaxy S22 Ultra, which combines the best elements of both the Galaxy S and Galaxy Note series in one device. The most affordable entry into Samsung's new S class is again the Galaxy S22, which at 6.1 inches has similar dimensions to the Apple iPhone 13, but uses the same SoC as the Galaxy S22 Ultra in the form of the Exynos 2200.

The Galaxy S22+ is the third device to complete the current Galaxy S line-up. In terms of performance, it plays in the same league as its two sister models thanks to the use of the same SoC. In terms of features and price, however, it is much closer to the Galaxy S22 than to the Galaxy S22 Ultra.

Test device courtesy of Samsung Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Galaxy S Series)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 2200 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Exynos X2 / Cortex-A710 / A510

Graphics adapter

Samsung Xclipse 920

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5

Display

6.60 inch 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixel 390 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 98.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, Barometer, Fingerprint Sensor, Gyro Sensor, Geomagnetic Sensor, Hall Sensor, Proximity Sensor, UWB, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Full, Wi-Fi Direct, Samsung Smart Switch, Samsung DeX

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1.800, 1.900 MHz), 3G (B1, B2, B4, B5, B8), 4G (B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, B7, B8, B12, B13, B17, B18, B19, B20, B25, B26, B28, B32, B38, B39, B40, B41, B41, B66), 5G (N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N28, N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78), Dual-SIM (Nano-SIM), eSIM, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.6 x 157.4 x 75.8 ( = 0.3 x 6.2 x 2.98 in)

Battery

4500 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, OIS, FOV 85°) + 12MP Ultrawide camera (f/2.2, FOV 120°) + 10MP Telephoto camera (3x optical zoom, OIS, f/2.4, FOV 36°); videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix f/2.2, FOV 80°

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, USB cable, SIM tool, Quick start guide, Warranty Information, One UI 4.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless, waterproof

Weight

196 g ( = 6.91 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Price

1049 Euro

Links

Samsung homepage
Samsung notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
88.9 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy S22+ Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	196 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
90.5 %	10/2021	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15, A15 GPU 5-Core	238 g	128 GB NVMe	6.70"	2778x1284
88.1 %	06/2022	OnePlus 10 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	200.5 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
89.2 %	04/2022	Oppo Find X5 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	221 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
89.6 %	02/2021	Samsung Galaxy S21+ Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14	200 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
87.6 %	02/2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440

Case: High-quality glass chassis with aluminium frame

The Galaxy S22+ uses a frameless and flat design throughout with rounded corners, making it very similar to the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max. Apart from the smaller form factor, the Galaxy S22 uses exactly the same casing, which is IP68-certified. Accordingly, this means the smartphone is dustproof and can survive a 30-minute dive in fresh water up to 1.5 meters without damage.

On the front and back, the Galaxy S22+ is protected by Gorilla Glass Victus+. The binding element is a frame made of Armor Aluminium, which aims to reinforce the rigidity of the smartphone and actually makes it extremely resistant to any attempt to dent or twist it. All in all, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ looks and feels very high-quality.

The most striking design element on the back is the triple camera, which protrudes a few millimeters from the casing and is enclosed on two sides by the aforementioned metal frame that connects the display and back cover. The matte surface finish of the back cover matches well with the "clean" look of the front and also makes the smartphone rather resistant to fingerprints.

Samsung offers the Galaxy S22+ in "Phantom Black" (like our review device) and in the case colors of "Phantom White", "Green" and "Pink Gold". In addition, there are other color variants such as "Graphite", "Cream", "Violet" and "Sky Blue", which are only available in the Samsung shop.

Size Comparison

Hardware: 8 GB RAM and up to 256 GB storage in the Galaxy S22+

Samsung offers the Galaxy S22+ in two storage variants. With 8 GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 128 GB of UFS 3.1 memory, the smartphone costs US$ 749.99, while the variant with 8/256 GB costs US$ 1,079.99. The internal memory cannot be expanded due to the lack of a microSD slot.

The USB-C port of the Galaxy S22+ works at USB 3.2 Gen.1 speed and achieved data rates of around 300 MB/s under testing. It can also be used as an audio port with an adapter. Moreover, the USB-C port supports USB OTB and can be used to connect peripheral devices.

Right: control key, volume rocker switch

Top: microphone, loudspeaker on edge of display

Bottom: Dual SIM, microphone, USB-C 3.1 Gen.1, speaker

Software: OS updates up to Android 16

The Galaxy S22+ runs Android 12 and the manufacturer's own One UI 4.1 interface. At the time of testing (mid-April), the Android security patches were from 01 April - it doesn't get any more up to date than this.

The OS and preinstalled apps reduce the free storage space on our 128 GB review device to around 98 GB. The ROM comes with only a few third-party apps, such as Facebook and Spotify, as well as a handful of Microsoft tools. Excluding OneDrive, which can be deactivated at the very least, all third-party apps can be uninstalled.

Of particular interest to buyers: The Galaxy S22+ will receive up to four Android OS upgrades and five years of security patches, so users will likely be able to enjoy using the smartphone up to and including Android 16. Under the S21 series, users received updates for a year less (with the exception of the Enterprise edition).

Communication and GNSS: UWB chip and WiFi 6E

The Samsung Galaxy S22+ supports a wide range of mobile frequencies, including 17 5G bands, so you should have good reception everywhere. It differs from the Galaxy S22 in two ways regarding its communication features, which include Bluetooth 5.2 and NFC: The Galaxy S22+ has an ultra-wideband (UWB) chip and offers WiFi 6E instead of WiFi 6.

In the practical Wi-Fi test with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the Galaxy S22+ achieved very high transfer rates with peak values of over 1500 Mbps. In WiFi 6 mode, the data throughput remains high and stable, but is significantly reduced compared to WiFi 6E.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1465 (1307^min - 1536^max) MBit/s ∼100% +77%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	944 (859^min - 952^max) MBit/s ∼64% +14%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	826 (765^min - 881^max) MBit/s ∼56%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	820 (799^min - 837^max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=158, last 2 years)	636 MBit/s ∼43% -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1214 (516^min - 1524^max) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	899 (432^min - 966^max) MBit/s ∼74%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	893 (835^min - 941^max) MBit/s ∼74% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	890 (433^min - 934^max) MBit/s ∼73% -1%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=159, last 2 years)	672 MBit/s ∼55% -25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1894, n=29, last 2 years)	1479 MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1346 (696^min - 1430^max) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1565 (777^min - 1666^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (598 - 1840, n=29, last 2 years)	1366 MBit/s ∼87% -13%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	875 (836^min - 889^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	747 (650^min - 862^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	600 (305^min - 657^max) MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone (16.9 - 1368, n=69, last 2 years)	532 MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	855 (827^min - 886^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	854 (804^min - 879^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	718 (707^min - 724^max) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone (32.7 - 953, n=70, last 2 years)	504 MBit/s ∼59%

Samsung Galaxy S22+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1323 (696-1430)

Samsung Galaxy S22+; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1538 (777-1666)

Samsung Galaxy S22+; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø825 (765-881)

Samsung Galaxy S22+; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (432-966)

In matters of navigation, the Galaxy S22+ uses data derived from GPS (B1, B5), Glonass (B1), Beidou (B1, B2a), Galileo (B1, B5a) and QZSS. Indoors, location accuracy was up to 5 meters, outdoors up to 3 meters.

The outdoor practice test also showed that the Galaxy S22+ provides accurate location data and is very well suited for navigation tasks. On a 5-kilometre-long bicycle ride, the smartphone pinpointed our location nearly as precisely as the Garmin Venu 2 (navigation device used for comparison). The Galaxy S22+ is not so quite on point in densely built-up areas, but this is unlikely to make a difference in everyday life.

Phone Functions & Voice Quality

The Galaxy S22+ provides very good voice quality. Voices sound natural and are easy to understand even in noisy environments. Upon activation of the loudspeaker, sound quality and intelligbility remained solid although there were some slight voice reverberations from time to time.

In addition to VoLTE, the Galaxy S22 also supports WLAN calls. The first option can be found in the connection settings while Wi-Fi calling can be activated in the phone app.

Cameras: Good triple camera with OIS

The Galaxy S22+ and Galaxy S22 share the same triple camera setup, which consists of a 50 MP wide-angle camera with an optical image stabilizer (OIS), a 12 MP ultra-wide-angle camera, and a 10 MP telephoto camera with OIS and 3x optical zoom. The 10 MP front camera is integrated into the display via a small round opening and takes well-balanced selfies.

The Galaxy S22+ is the right smartphone for users who do not want to deal with recording parameters such as aperture, exposure and white balance. In the "Pro" mode of the camera software, you can of course configure all important shooting settings yourself. The standard "Photo" mode, which automatically selects the best scene settings, produces almost equally good photos. They please with natural-looking colors, high contrasts and strong detail. As is typical for Samsung, however, the camera software occasionally tends to oversaturate images.

Night shots are often the Achilles heel of smartphones. Fortunately, this does not apply to the Galaxy S22+. Its main camera takes comparatively good and surprisingly detailed pictures even in low light. The telephoto camera brings subjects closer with a 3x optical zoom which, in combination with optical image stabilization, also results in good images. The digital zoom offers up to 30x magnification. In contrast to the main and telecamera, the ultrawide-angle camera of the Galaxy S22+ falls behind due to average photos which are rather blurred and noisy at the edges.

The Galaxy S22+ records videos at up to 8K at 24 frames per second. Those who also want to use the telephoto and ultra-wide-angle camera for recording have to limit themselves to 4K at 30 FPS, but these nonetheless compensate with good image quality. Like the Galaxy S22, the Galaxy S22+ can also record videos in HDR10+, which works up to a maximum of 4K at 30 frames per second.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 5-facher Zoom Ultraweitwinkel Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

In the photo lab, we took another closer look at the main camera. Reference colors are reproduced very accurately, with the exception of some darker green and brown tones. The test chart is reproduced completely even at an illumination level of 1 lux, but is still rather blurry.

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy S22+: 5.74 ∆E min: 1.36 - max: 14.23 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty: Optional 45 watt power supply unit

As is already clear from the flat packaging, the Galaxy S22+ does not come with a power supply unit. All that is included is a USB cable (type C to A), a SIM tool and a quick guide as well as leaflets with warranty information. Samsung offers the optional 45-watt fast-charging adapter in its online shop. There, you can also stock up on wireless charging pads, protective cases and headphones, among other things.

The Samsung Galaxy S22 comes with a 24-month warranty, which can be extended via the Samsung Care+ insurance package.

Input Devices & Operation: Ultrasonic fingerprint sensor and 2D face scan

The Samsung Galaxy S22+ can be operated very smoothly and never gave the impression of being overwhelmed by any task in our review. Apps start quickly, switching between open applications takes place without jerks, and finger inputs are handled without any delay. Only when booting up the smartphone do you have to wait a short moment for the user interface to finish loading but this only takes a few seconds.

For authentication, you can use the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor which is hidden under the display and unlocks the smartphone quickly and reliably. The second biometric recognition method is 2D face recognition, which is not quite as reliable as the fingerprint sensor, but nonetheless achieves an equally high hit rate in good lighting conditions.

Display: 120 Hz AMOLED panel with 1500 cd/m²

The 6.6-inch AMOLED display of the Galaxy S22+ has a resolution of 2340x1080 and dynamically adjusts its refresh rate in the range of 10 to 120 Hz under default settings. Nominally, it achieves the same high luminosity as the Galaxy S22 Ultra, namely up to 1750 nits. Under testing, the AMOLED screen does not reach the manufacturer's specification of 1500 cd/m², but still achieves an impressively high luminosity.

Without the brightness sensor, the display shines at a maximum of 419 cd/m², while this increases to 714 cd/m² with the "additional brightness" option activated. At the lowest brightness setting, we measured 1.69 cd/m², which falls to 0.33 cd/m² if you turn on "Extra Dimming" in the Android settings under "Input Help" and "Visibility Improvements".

We also observed the PWM flickering typical of OLED panels when adjusting the brightness on the Galaxy S22+. Depending on the brightness level, this operates at a constant 120 or 240 Hz and should thus cause few or no complaints (even for sensitive users).


1095 cd/m²	1085 cd/m²	1106 cd/m²
1094 cd/m²	1090 cd/m²	1107 cd/m²
1101 cd/m²	1091 cd/m²	1101 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1107 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1096.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1090 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.5 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.04

	Samsung Galaxy S22+ AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.60	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70	OnePlus 10 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70	Oppo Find X5 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70	Samsung Galaxy S21+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2400x1080, 6.70	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Screen		30%	17%	15%	2%	11%
Brightness middle	1090	1049 -4%	793 -27%	746 -32%	814 -25%	959 -12%
Brightness	1097	1060 -3%	776 -29%	744 -32%	814 -26%	977 -11%
Brightness Distribution	98	98 0%	95 -3%	97 -1%	97 -1%	96 -2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.5	0.78 69%	0.79 68%	0.9 64%	2 20%	1.1 56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.8	1.72 55%	1.93 49%	1.6 58%	3.6 5%	3.1 18%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	0.8 65%	1.3 43%	1.6 30%	1.4 39%	1.9 17%
Gamma	2.04 ^108%	2.181 ^101%	2.223 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.12 ^104%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6492 ^100%	6559 ^99%	6624 ^98%	6499 ^100%	6568 ^99%	6498 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19046 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

maximal manual brightness with boost — 100%

Messreihe mit fixer Zoomstufe und unterschiedlichen Helligkeitseinstellungen

In the display settings, users can choose between "Vivid" and "Natural". The Galaxy S22+ delivers the best display quality under the latter setting. With delta E values of less than 3 in each case, the deviations for colors and grayscales are just as much in the ideal range as the color temperature and the RGB balance.

Color accuracy (color mode: natural; color space: sRGB)

Color space (color mode: natural; color space: sRGB)

Grayscale (color mode: natural; color space: sRGB)

Saturation (color mode: natural; color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.153 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5785 ms rise
1.153 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5745 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8.548 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.274 ms rise
8.548 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.274 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

The Galaxy S22+ offers a screen that is ideal for outdoor use. Even in direct sunlight, screen content remains very visible. In the shade, apart from the reflective display, there are no limitations on readability.

The viewing angle stability of the AMOLED panel is very high. At flat viewing angles, brightness can decrease somewhat and a slight greenish or bluish discoloration of the image may appear, but neither of these are cause for concern.

Performance: High-end SoC with room for improvement

In addition to the Galaxy S22+, the Galaxy S22 and the Galaxy S22 Ultra also use the Exynos 2200 and thus the same high-end SoC. The octa-core processor is currently one of the fastest smartphone CPUs, but is still not quite sufficient to match the top dogs. Competitors such as the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or the Apple A15 Bionic are even faster.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	1742 Points ∼100% +54%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1257 Points ∼72% +11%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1211 Points ∼70% +7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (1133 - 1154, n=3)	1144 Points ∼66% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1133 Points ∼65%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	1100 Points ∼63% -3%
Average of class Smartphone (119 - 1885, n=241, last 2 years)	823 Points ∼47% -27%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	4914 Points ∼100% +37%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points ∼76% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3599 Points ∼73%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (3474 - 3599, n=3)	3544 Points ∼72% -2%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3521 Points ∼72% -2%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3488 Points ∼71% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	3364 Points ∼68% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=241, last 2 years)	2641 Points ∼54% -27%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1011412 Points ∼100% +19%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points ∼95% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	856953 Points ∼85% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	850401 Points ∼84%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	800222 Points ∼79% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (704479 - 850401, n=3)	789542 Points ∼78% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (111952 - 1322448, n=162, last 2 years)	657906 Points ∼65% -23%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	14998 Points ∼100%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (12579 - 14998, n=3)	13882 Points ∼93% -7%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13827 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13131 Points ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12144 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone (4780 - 28378, n=228, last 2 years)	10651 Points ∼71% -29%

CrossMark - Overall
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1169 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1129 Points ∼97%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (942 - 1129, n=3)	1009 Points ∼86% -11%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	956 Points ∼82% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points ∼69% -28%
Average of class Smartphone (226 - 1356, n=127, last 2 years)	795 Points ∼68% -30%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	8124 Points ∼100% +13%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7186 Points ∼88%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (6319 - 7186, n=3)	6832 Points ∼84% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6799 Points ∼84% -5%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6584 Points ∼81% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	6144 Points ∼76% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6007 Points ∼74% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (411 - 9585, n=162, last 2 years)	5140 Points ∼63% -28%
System
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	19657 Points ∼100% +73%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11373 Points ∼58%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (10464 - 11373, n=3)	11016 Points ∼56% -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	10492 Points ∼53% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10340 Points ∼53% -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10006 Points ∼51% -12%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	9934 Points ∼51% -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2565 - 19657, n=162, last 2 years)	8903 Points ∼45% -22%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6844 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6523 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (6212 - 6844, n=3)	6490 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	6246 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone (670 - 11617, n=162, last 2 years)	5648 Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5437 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5125 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	3612 Points ∼53% -47%
Graphics
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	25642 Points ∼100% +47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21944 Points ∼86% +26%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21678 Points ∼85% +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17475 Points ∼68%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (17104 - 17475, n=3)	17283 Points ∼67% -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	15216 Points ∼59% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	14636 Points ∼57% -16%
Average of class Smartphone (697 - 30125, n=162, last 2 years)	11187 Points ∼44% -36%
Web
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	2392 Points ∼100% +22%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1960 Points ∼82%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (1434 - 1960, n=3)	1773 Points ∼74% -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1669 Points ∼70% -15%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1527 Points ∼64% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	1486 Points ∼62% -24%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 2392, n=162, last 2 years)	1451 Points ∼61% -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1444 Points ∼60% -26%

AImark - Score v2.x
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 8192	226728 Points ∼100% +3486%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144	107460 Points ∼47% +1600%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	72572 Points ∼32% +1048%
Average of class Smartphone (1043 - 286905, n=120, last 2 years)	45552 Points ∼20% +620%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (6217 - 6487, n=3)	6342 Points ∼3% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	6323 Points ∼3%
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6121 Points ∼3% -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5982 Points ∼3% -5%

The Xclipse 920 GPU integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2200 is undoubtedly one of the fastest of its kind, but it does not reach the processing power of the Adreno 730 and Apple Bionic A15 GPUs used in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Apple A15 Bionic, respectively.

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	2817 Points ∼100% +46%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2568 Points ∼91% +33%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2523 Points ∼90% +30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points ∼89% +30%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1935 Points ∼69%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	3080 Points ∼100% +40%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2637 Points ∼86% +20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points ∼85% +18%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2575 Points ∼84% +17%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2202 Points ∼71%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	11688 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points ∼89% +32%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10282 Points ∼88% +30%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10175 Points ∼87% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7890 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6010 Points ∼51% -24%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10034 Points ∼100% +30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9927 Points ∼99% +29%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9826 Points ∼98% +27%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	9680 Points ∼96% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7710 Points ∼77%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5668 Points ∼56% -26%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4150 Points ∼100% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4137 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3998 Points ∼96% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3909 Points ∼94%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3902 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	1902 Points ∼46% -51%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19283 Points ∼100% +31%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18090 Points ∼94% +23%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	16202 Points ∼84% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14680 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13950 Points ∼72% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10913 Points ∼57% -26%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10323 Points ∼100% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10005 Points ∼97% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9149 Points ∼89% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9105 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8001 Points ∼78% -12%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	5782 Points ∼56% -36%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12123 Points ∼100% +8%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11411 Points ∼94% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11221 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10958 Points ∼90% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7718 Points ∼64% -31%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25285 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25242 Points ∼100% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23949 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20842 Points ∼82% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9794 Points ∼39% -59%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4296 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4120 Points ∼96% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3923 Points ∼91%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3922 Points ∼91% 0%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps ∼100% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps ∼98% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps ∼98%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼50% -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps ∼100% +33%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	409.6 fps ∼96% +28%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps ∼89% +19%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	368 fps ∼87% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	320 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	242 fps ∼57% -24%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps ∼98% -2%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps ∼50% -50%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼50% -50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼50% -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps ∼100% +17%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	227.9 fps ∼91% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	214 fps ∼85%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	204 fps ∼81% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	181 fps ∼72% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	161 fps ∼64% -25%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps ∼76% -24%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	60 fps ∼53% -47%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼53% -47%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps ∼49% -51%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	144 fps ∼85% +11%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	131 fps ∼78% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	130 fps ∼77%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps ∼66% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	107 fps ∼63% -18%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps ∼100%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps ∼77% -23%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	53.2 fps ∼73% -27%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps ∼53% -47%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps ∼49% -51%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	92.9 fps ∼100% +29%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps ∼78%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps ∼76% -1%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps ∼76% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps ∼68% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps ∼67% -14%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps ∼100% +6%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	54.8 fps ∼96% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps ∼77% -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps ∼63% -33%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps ∼47% -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps ∼100% +39%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps ∼93% +29%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	37.9 fps ∼88% +22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps ∼79% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps ∼63% -13%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps ∼96% -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼90% -10%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	59.1 fps ∼88% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps ∼66% -34%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	108 fps ∼100% +80%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps ∼94% +68%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	94 fps ∼87% +57%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps ∼85% +53%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps ∼59% +7%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps ∼56%

In terms of browser performance, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ delivers very solid performance. Like all other Android smartphones, however, it appears out of its depth against the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	181.8 Points ∼100% +69%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	107.364 Points ∼59%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	103 Points ∼57% -4%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	101.23 Points ∼56% -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (96.4 - 107.4, n=3)	100.2 Points ∼55% -7%
Average of class Smartphone (17.3 - 282, n=164, last 2 years)	85.8 Points ∼47% -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points ∼46% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	66.3 Points ∼36% -38%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	402.9 Points ∼100% +197%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	172.8 Points ∼43% +27%
OnePlus 10 Pro	158.342 Points ∼39% +17%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (118.9 - 200, n=3)	151.5 Points ∼38% +12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	147.5 Points ∼37% +9%
Average of class Smartphone (27.5 - 414, n=78, last 2 years)	136.9 Points ∼34% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	135.54 Points ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	117.8 Points ∼29% -13%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	242 runs/min ∼100% +130%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	129.3 runs/min ∼53% +23%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (105 - 111, n=3)	108 runs/min ∼45% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	105 runs/min ∼43%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	104 runs/min ∼43% -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	85.8 runs/min ∼35% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (13.3 - 375, n=153, last 2 years)	79.9 runs/min ∼33% -24%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	73.5 runs/min ∼30% -30%

WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	248 Points ∼100% +62%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	193 Points ∼78% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	153 Points ∼62%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (124 - 153, n=3)	142 Points ∼57% -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	133 Points ∼54% -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	119 Points ∼48% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (34 - 292, n=144, last 2 years)	112.6 Points ∼45% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	102 Points ∼41% -33%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	63831 Points ∼100% +44%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	49343 Points ∼77% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	44398 Points ∼70%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (34055 - 44398, n=3)	39148 Points ∼61% -12%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	38407 Points ∼60% -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points ∼47% -33%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 74261, n=193, last 2 years)	29582 Points ∼46% -33%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	28247 Points ∼44% -36%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 10031, n=167, last 2 years)	1945 ms * ∼100% -25%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ (Chrome 88.0.4324.152)	1744 ms * ∼90% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ (Chrome 100.0.4896.127)	1557.9 ms * ∼80%
Average Samsung Exynos 2200 (1259 - 1566, n=3)	1461 ms * ∼75% +6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * ∼68% +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)	1125 ms * ∼58% +28%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)	823.5 ms * ∼42% +47%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max (Safari 15)	414.8 ms * ∼21% +73%

* ... smaller is better

The performance of the UFS 3.1 storage is at a high level. Apart from the Oppo Find X5 Pro, its sequential read speed is not quite as high as that of the comparison devices. But this is not noticeable in everyday life because apps start very quickly.

	Samsung Galaxy S22+	OnePlus 10 Pro	Oppo Find X5 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S21+	Xiaomi 12 Pro	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		1%	-23%	0%	26%	-16%	-28%
Sequential Read 256KB	1629.99	1602.12 -2%	1410 -13%	1623 0%	1620 -1%	1600 ?(1030 - 3134, n=47) -2%	1183 ?(215 - 4512, n=234, last 2 years) -27%
Sequential Write 256KB	1001.67	1253.34 25%	894 -11%	1037 4%	1465 46%	786 ?(233 - 1284, n=47) -22%	743 ?(13.6 - 3062, n=234, last 2 years) -26%
Random Read 4KB	306.7	284.34 -7%	183.7 -40%	309.6 1%	324.9 6%	243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=47) -21%	208 ?(22.2 - 543, n=234, last 2 years) -32%
Random Write 4KB	297.67	264.45 -11%	210.4 -29%	283.3 -5%	448.9 51%	238 ?(121.4 - 503, n=47) -20%	217 ?(13 - 572, n=235, last 2 years) -27%

Gaming: Lots of potential for high frame rates

The Exynos 2200 and its Xclipse 920 GPU provide more than enough power to run current games smoothly. The FPS, however, depends primarily on the game played. The AMOLED screen of the Galaxy S22+ manages up to 120 FPS and is also able to fully exploit this advantage in Armajet. In the second test game PUBG Mobile, however, only a maximum of 30 FPS was possible, although there is still a lot more room for improvement. Then again, the frame rate almost never falls below the 30 FPS mark.

Frame rates were determined with our Gamebench test tool.

Samsung Galaxy S22+; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø102.7 (75-120)

Samsung Galaxy S22+; PUBG Mobile; 1.9.0: Ø29.8 (26-31)

Emissions: Weak cooling slows down the Exynos 2200

Temperature

The Galaxy S22+ reaches a maximum of 35.3 °C during operation, which does not cause any discomfort when held. Internally, however, the smartphone has to keep the heat of the Exynos 2200 SoC under control with throttling. This happens quite quickly under load as 3DMark's Wild Life Stress tests show. Shortly after starting, the benchmark scores drop and are 58% below the best result in the worst case.

Max. Load

Idle


34.7 °C 94 F	35.2 °C 95 F	32.4 °C 90 F
35.1 °C 95 F	35.3 °C 96 F	33 °C 91 F
34.8 °C 95 F	33.4 °C 92 F	31.6 °C 89 F

Maximum: 35.3 °C = 96 F
Average: 33.9 °C = 93 F


31.4 °C 89 F	33.7 °C 93 F	33.2 °C 92 F
30.1 °C 86 F	33.1 °C 92 F	34.3 °C 94 F
29.8 °C 86 F	31.4 °C 89 F	34.4 °C 94 F

Maximum: 34.4 °C = 94 F
Average: 32.4 °C = 90 F

Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 34.9 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	80.1 (44.5^min) % ∼100% +38%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.3 (41.6^min) % ∼87% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S21+ Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	65.8 (3805^min) % ∼82% +13%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 (37.2^min) % ∼78% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.2 (27.4^min) % ∼73%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47.2 (27.4^min) % ∼59% -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe	77 (12.3^min) % ∼100% +26%
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73.1 (11.3^min) % ∼95% +20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62.7 (9.64^min) % ∼81% +3%
Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.9 (8.06^min) % ∼79%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	% ∼0% -100%

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø9.11 (8.06-13.3)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (12.3-16)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.4 (27.4-47.1)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø47 (44.5-55.5)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø49.5 (34.8-61.7)

Speakers

The two speakers of the Galaxy S22+ can play loudly up to 91.3 dB(A) and deliver fairly balanced sound overall even if bass tones can hardly be heard.

Wired headphones or speakers can be connected via a USB-C adapter. The Bluetooth codecs AAC, aptX, LDAC and SBC are available for wireless connection.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery life: Slightly more stamina than the predecessor

Power Consumption

The Galaxy S22+ is inconspicuous in terms of power consumption. However, power consumption increases significantly under load and is also higher than that of the comparison devices.

The 4500 mAh battery of the Galaxy S22+ can be charged with up to 45 watts. Users have to acquire a matching power supply separately because Samsung does not include one with the smartphone. The Galaxy S22 Ultra offers the same charging power as the Galaxy S22+, but has a larger battery (5000 mAh). At the other end of the current Galaxy S line-up is the Galaxy S22 with a 3700 mAh capacity and a charging power capactiy of 25 watts.

Up to 15 W wireless charging is supported on the Galaxy S22+. With the Wireless PowerShare function, the smartphone can also charge other compatible Galaxy devices wirelessly.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.13 Watt
Idle	0.71 / 1.1 / 1.19 Watt
Load	7.74 / 9.64 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Samsung Galaxy S22+ 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max 4352 mAh	OnePlus 10 Pro 5000 mAh	Oppo Find X5 Pro 5000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S21+ 4800 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 2200	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	-8%	-8%	-3%	-3%	4%	-6%
Idle Minimum *	0.71	0.6 15%	0.7 1%	1.24 -75%	0.74 -4%	0.94 -32%	0.66 ?(0.58 - 0.71, n=3) 7%	0.883 ?(0.12 - 2.37, n=172, last 2 years) -24%
Idle Average *	1.1	1.5 -36%	1.1 -0%	1.39 -26%	1.27 -15%	1.24 -13%	1 ?(0.71 - 1.19, n=3) 9%	1.487 ?(0.65 - 2.98, n=172, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Maximum *	1.19	1.6 -34%	1.7 -43%	1.42 -19%	1.33 -12%	1.34 -13%	1.203 ?(1.16 - 1.26, n=3) -1%	1.701 ?(0.69 - 3.11, n=172, last 2 years) -43%
Load Average *	7.74	3.5 55%	6.4 17%	3.58 54%	6.32 18%	5.7 26%	7.26 ?(6.97 - 7.74, n=3) 6%	4.26 ?(2.1 - 10, n=172, last 2 years) 45%
Load Maximum *	9.64	4.8 50%	11.3 -17%	6.99 27%	9.61 -0%	8.12 16%	9.94 ?(8.85 - 11.3, n=3) -3%	7.1 ?(3.56 - 13.7, n=172, last 2 years) 26%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200: Ø7.01 (1.002-15.6)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.63 (0.728-10.5)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.81 (1.309-12.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.3 (6.26-14.5)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.75 (8.24-9.27)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (6.94-8.13)

Samsung Galaxy S22+ Samsung Exynos 2200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.814 (0.76-1.222)

Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.773 (0.705-0.881)

Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.977 (0.881-1.647)

Battery Life

With 13 hours of simulated web surfing and 17 hours of video playback, the Samsung Galaxy S22+ achieves good battery runtimes. Although the smartphone does not reach the level of the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, it beats all Android comparison devices and its predecessor, the Galaxy S21+ (even though these have slightly larger batteries).

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		42h 55min
WiFi Websurfing		13h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)		6h 04min

	Samsung Galaxy S22+