Notebookcheck Logo

OnePlus 10 Pro Review - Successful Flagship Smartphone with Questionable Adjustments

Worse than its predecessor? The OnePlus 10 Pro aims to court favour in the high-end smartphone segment with ultra-fast charging, Hasselblad-branded cameras and state-of-the-art hardware components. However, the flagship phone has some technical setbacks compared to the OnePlus 9 Pro. Is it still worth buying?
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

After the OnePlus 10 Pro was unveiled in China in January of this year, the Chinese-made flagship has now also made its way to Europe. As with the OnePlus 9 Pro, one of the highlights is likely to be the triple camera with second-generation Hasselblad tech. The camera specialists from Sweden have once again optimized the three cameras this year, which should ensure authentic colors. However, this project only worked to a limited extent with the predecessor.

Like other current high-end smartphones, the 10 Pro uses a Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and a 120 Hz fast LTPO 2.0 AMOLED display, which measures 6.7 inches diagonally and has a resolution of 3,216 x 1,440 pixels.

Depending on the variant, the OnePlus smartphone comes with either 8 GB of LPDDR5 RAM and 128 GB of UFS 3.1 storage, or with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB of storage. The features of the OnePlus 10 Pro are rounded off by a 5,000 mAh battery, which can be charged quickly with up to 80 watts via SuperVOOC and up to 50 watts wirelessly via AirVOOC.

OnePlus 10 Pro (10 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.70 inch 20.1:9, 3216 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, LTPO, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 224 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flimmer, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, GSM:B2, 3, 5, 8, WCDMA:B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 19, LTE-FDD:B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 66, 71, LTE-TDD:B38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 5G: n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n25, n28, n30, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n71, n77, n78, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163 x 73.9 ( = 0.34 x 6.42 x 2.91 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.8, 23mm, 1/1.43", 1.12µm) + 50 MP (f/2.2, 14mm, 1/2.76", 0.64µm) + 8 MP (3.3x optical zoom, f/2.4, 77mm, 1.0µm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 1/2.74", 0.8µm)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, case, charger, USB cable, Oxygen OS, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, fanless
Weight
200.5 g ( = 7.07 oz / 0.44 pounds), Power Supply: 114 g ( = 4.02 oz / 0.25 pounds)
Price
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparision

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.9 %
06/2022
OnePlus 10 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
200.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
88.4 %
06/2022
OnePlus 9 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89 %
04/2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
87.4 %
02/2022
Xiaomi 12 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
204 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
89.3 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440

Case - OnePlus smartphone available in two colours

OnePlus 10 Pro in green
OnePlus 10 Pro in green

The design of the OnePlus 10 Pro is characterized in particular by the newly designed ceramic cover of the rear cameras with 3D nano microcrystals. According to the manufacturer, this makes the surface particularly hard and resistant. In terms of colors, not much has changed compared to the OnePlus 9 Pro. With "Volcanic Black" and "Emerald Forest", there is once again a black and green variant to choose from. Both color options have a matte finish which we find very visually appealing. Fingerprints are hardly visible due to the matte finish of the Gorilla Glass 5 surface.

The build quality and feel are at a very high level. The slightly curved glass edges on the back feel pleasant in the hands. In contrast to the predecessor, the manufacturer does away with an IP certification for the current flagship smartphone, so there is no official protection against dust, splash water or rain. As with the OnePlus 9, the 10 Pro is sealed (according to OnePlus Germany), so contact with water should (theoretically) not be a problem.

The 2.5D Gorilla Glass Victus on the front curves slightly over the edges, which makes for quite thin edges on the top and bottom of the 6.7-inch display. The display surface ratio is a good 90 percent. The typical alert slider of the Chinese manufacturer is located on the right side of the case, which can be used to quickly switch between sound settings.

Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

Size Comparision

163.6 mm / 6.44 inch 74.6 mm / 2.94 inch 8.66 mm / 0.3409 inch 204 g0.4497 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 77.9 mm / 3.07 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 228 g0.503 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 73.9 mm / 2.91 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 221 g0.4872 lbs163.2 mm / 6.43 inch 73.6 mm / 2.9 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 197 g0.4343 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 73.9 mm / 2.91 inch 8.6 mm / 0.3386 inch 200.5 g0.442 lbs

Hardware - OnePlus smartphone with UFS storage

The OnePlus 10 Pro's hardware features include wireless image transfer of screen content (Miracast) as well as USB OTG for quick connection of external accessories. A USB Type-C port that supports the USB 3.1 standard is available for wired data transfer.
The internal UFS storage of our test device has a capacity of 256 GB. Minus the Android system and the preinstalled apps, the available capacity is only 224 GB upon delivery. Expanding the OnePlus phone's memory using microSD cards is not possible.

Right side of case (alert slider, power button)
Right side of case (alert slider, power button)
Left side of case (volume rocker)
Left side of case (volume rocker)
Top of case (microphone)
Top of case (microphone)
Bottom of case (speakers, USB port, microphone, card slot)
Bottom of case (speakers, USB port, microphone, card slot)

Software - OnePlus 10 Pro with Android 12

The operating system is Google's Android version 12 with security patches as of March 2022. The "Day One Patch" for market launch (V12.1) has already been applied to our test device. 
Everything initially appears to have more or less remained the same, but the Chinese are breaking new ground with the current Oxygen OS 12 system interface. BBK Electronics is merging the operating systems of its Oppo and OnePlus brands so that the user interfaces build upon a uniform code base called Unified OS.
The OnePlus 10 Pro's in-house user interface features an improved Dark Mode with three customizable levels, revamped icon symbols with improved textures, and new layouts in the Gallery app. 

Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

Communication and GNSS - OnePlus smartphone with WiFi 6

In terms of communication, OnePlus uses Bluetooth 5.2, dual-SIM, 5G and NFC for contactless payment. The 10 Pro performs very well in regard to WLAN thanks to WiFi 6 and multi-user MIMO, which ensures high transfer rates in the home network. However, other current flagships, such as the Xiaomi 12 Pro, perform even better than the OnePlus smartphone in our Wi-Fi test.
In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the 10 Pro is very consistent in terms of transfer rates, but use of the 6 GHz band (WiFi 6E) was not possible.
Thanks to the integrated Qualcomm X65 modem, the flagship smartphone can (theoretically) download at speeds of up to 10 Gbit/s via mobile internet. In addition to the 5G standard, the OnePlus 10 Pro also supports access to a total of 26 LTE bands. We can thus confirm an attractive frequency coverage for the German-speaking region, but the smartphone is also suitable for trips abroad.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
680 (649min - 703max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1395, n=209, last 2 years)
486 MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AX12
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (635min - 854max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1348, n=209, last 2 years)
473 MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1465 (1307min - 1536max) MBit/s ∼100% +55%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
944 (859min - 952max) MBit/s ∼64%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
820 (799min - 837max) MBit/s ∼56% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
716 (539min - 791max) MBit/s ∼49% -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72.5 - 1736, n=49, last 2 years)
636 MBit/s ∼43% -33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1214 (516min - 1524max) MBit/s ∼100% +36%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
893 (835min - 941max) MBit/s ∼74%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
890 (433min - 934max) MBit/s ∼73% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78.3 - 1710, n=49, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s ∼54% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
521 (311min - 704max) MBit/s ∼43% -42%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø944 (859-952)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø893 (835-941)
Localization outdoors
Localization outdoors
Localization indoors
Localization indoors

For localization, the OnePlus smartphone uses satellite systems ranging from GPS (L1+L5), Glonass, Galileo (E1+E5) to BeiDou as well as SBAS. The phone is quick to detect satellite signals and does so accurately both outdoors and indoors.

During a short test drive, the flagship smartphone was tested against the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch. The OnePlus 10 Pro tracks the route very accurately and only occasionally shows minimal deviations. At the end of the 4 km route, there were only 10 meters of difference between the smartwatch and the OnePlus smartphone. So nothing stands in the way of using it for navigation tasks.

Garmin Venu 2 localization
Garmin Venu 2 localization
OnePlus 10 Pro localization
OnePlus 10 Pro localization

Phone Functions and Voice Quality - OnePlus 10 Pro with Dual SIM

Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

Unfortunately, the high-end smartphone from OnePlus does not support eSIM. Only the two physical SIM card slots can be used. On the other hand, functions such as WLAN calling and VoLTE are supported.
We like the voice quality of the OnePlus 10 Pro. Whether held to the ear or via loudspeaker: there were no points of criticism. During "normal" calls, the conversation partner sounds quite natural and the user's voice is also conveyed very clearly. In hands-free mode, which we also checked using video telephony, some reverberation and distortions come into play. But good intelligibility is always given.

Cameras - OnePlus smartphone with triple cam

Selfie with the OnePlus 10 Pro
Selfie with the OnePlus 10 Pro
Portrait with the OnePlus 10 Pro
Portrait with the OnePlus 10 Pro

In the upper left corner, OnePlus makes use of a 32 MP front camera with Sony IMX615 sensor. In well-lit conditions, the 10 Pro takes very nice selfies. Surprisingly, however, there is no UHD option for video. Unlike the OnePlus 9 Pro, this flagship generation has to make do with 1080p.

The 48-megapixel main camera of the triple cam is still based on the 1/1.43-inch Sony IMX789 sensor of the predecessor. The 7P lens offers an aperture of f/1.8 as well as optical image stabilization and an equivalent focal length of 23 mm. The results of the main camera are rich in detail and the dynamic range in the shots is high. Overall, the OnePlus 10 Pro over-sharpens the subjects too much for our taste and the exposure doesn't always fit in bright areas of the image either. In very low light, the strength of the rather large sensor and OIS comes into play. The OnePlus phone captures a lot of image information despite the darkness, and the illumination is also very appealing. However, the sharpness could be better.

For improved color reproduction, the Chinese have once again collaborated with Swedish camera brand Hasselblad. Colors are captured naturally without the subjects appearing too pale. However, the color fidelity we measured is neither particularly good nor particularly bad - as with the predecessor, mediocrity prevails here. There is great potential for improvement, especially with bright green tones and greyscales.

While the OnePlus 9 Pro has an IMX766-based wide-angle camera with a comparatively large image sensor (1/1.56 inches), the OnePlus 10 Pro is equipped with a Samsung JN1 sensor, which has a sensor size of 1/2.76 inches and very small 0.64 micron pixels. Especially in low light, this is a step backwards in terms of photo quality. But even during the day, the level of sharpness is visibly worse than that of the OnePlus 9 Pro. On the other hand, the 10 Pro now has a special mode that allows for significantly wider-angle shots with an image area of 150 degrees.

The telephoto camera offers a resolution of 8 MP, a 3.3x zoom without any loss in quality, and OIS. The well-known OmniVision OV08A19 sensor delivers decent results, but even at fivefold magnification, subjects sometimes appear artificial. Thanks to the optical image stabilizer, relatively sharp shots can be taken even at 10x or 20x magnification.

All three lenses enable the capture of 12-bit RAW images and 10-bit video. New features include RAW+ mode, which has a larger dynamic range and better noise reduction, and a manual video mode. Moving images can again be recorded in 8K resolution at 24 fps or in 4K at 120 fps. Switching between lenses while a video recording is in progress is possible. However, the color temperatures between the main and wide-angle cameras are poorly matched.

Wide angle
Wide angle
Main camera
3.3x zoom
10x zoom
30x zoom (max)
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraLow LightWeitwinkel
click to load images
ColorChecker
17.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 10 Pro: 9.12 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 21.33 ∆E
ColorChecker
18 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
22.2 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
21.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 10 Pro: 20.16 ∆E min: 12.33 - max: 28.78 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - OnePlus 10 Pro with power charger

Modular 80 power charger of the OnePlus 10 Pro
Modular 80 power charger of the OnePlus 10 Pro

The OnePlus 10 Pro comes with an 80-watt modular power charger, a data (or charging) cable, a protective cover and a SIM pin, as well as a quick guide and warranty policy. However, USB 3.1 functionality requires a separate data cable that supports the standard. A USB 2.0 data cable is included in the delivery box.
OnePlus offers other accessories for the flagship smartphone in its web shop, including headphones and protective cases. A 24-month warranty is provided to those making their purchase in Germany.

Input Devices & Operation - OnePlus cell phone with 1,000 Hz

The fingerprint sensor under the OLED display reacts quickly and often detects the finger accurately. Although the optical sensor is not based on ultrasonic technology, as in the case of the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, the OnePlus 10 Pro is very reliable in everyday use. The positioning on the display has moved upwards again and is therefore more comfortable than on the predecessor.
Those who want to use facial recognition to unlock the screen can do so via the front camera. However, biometric identification with the face is not very secure due to the 2D process.  
OnePlus has installed an improved vibration motor in its flagship smartphone, which provides nice haptic feedback in everyday use. Typing on the OnePlus 10 Pro is therefore very pleasant.
The smartphone's operation not only benefits from a solid vibration motor, but also from a high refresh rate of 120 Hz as well as a sampling rate of up to 1,000 Hz. The capacitive multi-touch screen thus has a touch sampling rate of 1000 times per second in select applications (including games).

Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

Display - OnePlus 10 Pro with OLED

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

A 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED display with a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz comes into play here. The resolution is 3,216 x 1,440 pixels (QHD+), which results in a high pixel density of 525 PPI. The refresh rate of the LTPO 2.0 panel is adaptively controlled by the system between 1 and 120 Hz. Alternatively, it can be manually set at 60 Hz.
OnePlus does not achieve a big leap in luminance. The manufacturer specifies the HDR10 Plus-certified AMOLED panel at 1,300 nits, which we cannot confirm with our measurements. We measured a maximum brightness of 799 cd/m² for the APL50 - the APL10 still leaves room for improvement, but our test device did not reach the advertised 1,300 nits with our measurement protocol. The competition from Xiaomi or Samsung is clearly ahead here.
For brightness control, the flagship phone uses pulse width modulation (PWM) at a rather high frequency of 343 Hz. We could not find a DC dimming mode in the settings, but fluctuations in amplitude are much smaller at a low brightness.

794
cd/m²
776
cd/m²
766
cd/m²
756
cd/m²
793
cd/m²
779
cd/m²
782
cd/m²
774
cd/m²
762
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 794 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 775.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 793 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.79 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.223
OnePlus 10 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
OnePlus 9 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Xiaomi 12 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Screen
-11%
-5%
-16%
4%
Brightness middle
793
733
-8%
746
-6%
959
21%
1077
36%
Brightness
776
746
-4%
744
-4%
977
26%
1093
41%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
97
2%
96
1%
97
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.79
0.95
-20%
0.9
-14%
1.1
-39%
1.2
-52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.93
2.01
-4%
1.6
17%
3.1
-61%
2
-4%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.7
-31%
1.6
-23%
1.9
-46%
1.3
-0%
Gamma
2.223 99%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.37 93%
CCT
6624 98%
6591 99%
6499 100%
6498 100%
6526 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 342.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 342.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 342.5 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM flickering at low brightness
PWM flickering at low brightness
0% brightness
0% brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

The black level is absolute, as is usual for an OLED display, so that there is (in theory) a perfect contrast ratio. There is a choice of two color profiles and a Pro mode, which, among other things, controls the P3 color space. We examined the color calibration of the panel with CalMAN analysis software.
Under factory settings (profile: natural), the comparatively small sRGB color space is mostly covered. Representation of colors is extremely accurate, with very low DeltaE values. Grayscale also shows no color distortions.

Color accuracy (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Color accuracy (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Color space (color space: AdobeRGB; color profile: natural)
Color space (color space: AdobeRGB; color profile: natural)
Color space (color space: P3; color profile: natural)
Color space (color space: P3; color profile: natural)
Color space (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Color space (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Grayscale (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Grayscale (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Saturation (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)
Saturation (color space: sRGB; color profile: natural)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Outdoors, the OnePlus smartphone is convincing across the board, even in sunny weather. Thanks to satisfactory brightness and a strong contrast ratio, reflections on the screen are also not a problem. However, it is less of a summer phone than a Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra or Xiaomi 12 Pro.
The viewing angle stability of the AMOLED panel is also very high. Only a minimal loss of brightness is noticeable at flat viewing angles.

Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone

Performance - OnePlus smartphone with Qualcomm SoC

The OnePlus does not operate at full capacity out of the factory
The OnePlus does not operate at full capacity out of the factory

OnePlus uses Qualcomm's best chipset in the smartphone sector to date for the 10 Pro. The Snapdragon 8 Gen. 1 is a 4 nm SoC and is based on ARM's v9 architecture. The Kryo series CPU consists of three clusters made up of a prime core (Cortex X2), three power cores (Cortex A710) and four power-saving units (Cortex A510). The processor can also utilize the integrated Adreno 730 for graphics acceleration.
We completed our benchmark package in high-performance mode. Similar to Huawei devices, OnePlus has been throttling the performance of the Qualcomm chipset ex-factory since the last Oxygen iteration. In "normal" mode, the Snapdragon 8 Gen. 1 clocks at a lower rate, resulting in around 20 percent lower benchmark values.
Otherwise, the Snapdragon SoC in the OnePlus 10 Pro works at the level of a Xiaomi 12 Pro or Oppo Find X5 Pro, whereby the poor scores in AImark and the GFX onscreen results are noticeable. Even if high-performance mode is active, the BBK smartphones from Oppo and OnePlus lock up at 60 fps.  
In everyday use, the flagship phone nonetheless makes an excellent impression without high-performance mode. But gamers should not go without the extra power. The loading times of applications are very short, while the read rates of the UFS 3.1 storage should be somewhat higher.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1182 - 1298, n=15)
1233 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1211 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1192 Points ∼95% -2%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points ∼92% -5%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1129 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=255, last 2 years)
671 Points ∼53% -45%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3738 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3666 Points ∼98% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3269 - 3839, n=15)
3557 Points ∼95% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3521 Points ∼94%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points ∼93% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=255, last 2 years)
2195 Points ∼59% -38%
Vulkan Score 5.3
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
8702 Points ∼100% +22%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7112 Points ∼82%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6995 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5744 - 8462, n=12)
6669 Points ∼77% -6%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4544 Points ∼52% -36%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 8702, n=198, last 2 years)
2597 Points ∼30% -63%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
OpenCL Score 5.3
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
9069 Points ∼100% +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5829 - 6291, n=12)
6019 Points ∼66% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5985 Points ∼66%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5984 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4604 Points ∼51% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 9069, n=199, last 2 years)
2566 Points ∼28% -57%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
Points ∼0% -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13827 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (12144 - 17025, n=15)
13714 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13131 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points ∼91% -9%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12144 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=147, last 2 years)
10202 Points ∼74% -26%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12123 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11411 Points ∼94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9693 - 13121, n=12)
11044 Points ∼91% -3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10958 Points ∼90% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10415 Points ∼86% -9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8562 Points ∼71% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 13121, n=225, last 2 years)
4949 Points ∼41% -57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
25285 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
25242 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (17283 - 26049, n=12)
22797 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20842 Points ∼82% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
18689 Points ∼74% -26%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11227 Points ∼44% -56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=225, last 2 years)
6918 Points ∼27% -73%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4676 Points ∼100% +19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4296 Points ∼92% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4120 Points ∼88% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
4085 Points ∼87% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3649 - 4811, n=12)
4006 Points ∼86% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3922 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=223, last 2 years)
3245 Points ∼69% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10323 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10005 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (8374 - 11528, n=11)
9846 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9149 Points ∼89% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
8612 Points ∼83% -17%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8347 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 11528, n=233, last 2 years)
4017 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19283 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
18090 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (13039 - 19392, n=11)
16957 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13950 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12972 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11050 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 19364, n=233, last 2 years)
5005 Points ∼26% -74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4497 Points ∼100% +12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4150 Points ∼92% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (3651 - 4771, n=11)
4037 Points ∼90% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3998 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3957 Points ∼88% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3902 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=233, last 2 years)
3241 Points ∼72% -19%
Wild Life Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10034 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9927 Points ∼99% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9826 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6351 - 10062, n=11)
9201 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7236 Points ∼72% -28%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5736 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone
  (216 - 10062, n=183, last 2 years)
3197 Points ∼32% -68%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10384 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10282 Points ∼99%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10175 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6483 - 10412, n=15)
9672 Points ∼93% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7288 Points ∼70% -29%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5737 Points ∼55% -44%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 11700, n=184, last 2 years)
3392 Points ∼33% -67%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2637 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2609 Points ∼99% -1%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2575 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1629 - 2639, n=14)
2470 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
2044 Points ∼78% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 3080, n=139, last 2 years)
991 Points ∼38% -62%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2568 Points ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2523 Points ∼98% -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2513 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1567 - 2585, n=15)
2424 Points ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1916 Points ∼75% -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 2864, n=135, last 2 years)
977 Points ∼38% -62%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
121 fps ∼100% +102%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
118 fps ∼98% +97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=12)
104.4 fps ∼86% +74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.5 - 143, n=196, last 2 years)
69.2 fps ∼57% +15%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
425 fps ∼100% +15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
380 fps ∼89% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (245 - 450, n=13)
371 fps ∼87% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
368 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
302 fps ∼71% -18%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
258 fps ∼61% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6 - 439, n=196, last 2 years)
139.7 fps ∼33% -62%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
117 fps ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
108 fps ∼92% +80%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 121, n=12)
92.3 fps ∼79% +54%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼51% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼51%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=195, last 2 years)
56.2 fps ∼48% -6%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
251 fps ∼100% +23%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
204 fps ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (141 - 265, n=13)
195.5 fps ∼78% -4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
187 fps ∼75% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
181 fps ∼72% -11%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
151 fps ∼60% -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.4 - 251, n=196, last 2 years)
80 fps ∼32% -61%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
87 fps ∼100% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (50 - 121, n=12)
79.7 fps ∼92% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
71 fps ∼82% +18%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼69%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
57 fps ∼66% -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
56 fps ∼64% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 121, n=195, last 2 years)
43.7 fps ∼50% -27%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
169 fps ∼100% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (95 - 175, n=13)
136.6 fps ∼81% +4%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
131 fps ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
127 fps ∼75% -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
111 fps ∼66% -15%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
69 fps ∼41% -47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=196, last 2 years)
54.1 fps ∼32% -59%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (28 - 81, n=12)
50.5 fps ∼84% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
39 fps ∼65% -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
39 fps ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -40%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 81, n=195, last 2 years)
27.5 fps ∼46% -54%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 98, n=13)
78.2 fps ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps ∼91% 0%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
71 fps ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼87% -4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
63 fps ∼81% -11%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
59 fps ∼75% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 97, n=195, last 2 years)
32.8 fps ∼42% -54%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (39 - 98, n=14)
60.5 fps ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
60 fps ∼99%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼91% -8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
53 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
44 fps ∼73% -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
42 fps ∼69% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 98, n=251, last 2 years)
28.7 fps ∼47% -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
101 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (60 - 131, n=16)
100.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
94 fps ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
92 fps ∼91% -9%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
68 fps ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
63 fps ∼62% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 123, n=252, last 2 years)
34 fps ∼34% -66%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
57 fps ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (27 - 69, n=14)
45.4 fps ∼80% -20%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
42 fps ∼74% -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
36 fps ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
31 fps ∼54% -46%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
27 fps ∼47% -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 69, n=252, last 2 years)
19.8 fps ∼35% -65%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
43 fps ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
40 fps ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (19 - 49, n=16)
39.1 fps ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
34 fps ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
30 fps ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 47, n=252, last 2 years)
13 fps ∼30% -70%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1011412 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
962824 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (821646 - 1041980, n=14)
946438 Points ∼94% -6%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1041980, n=111, last 2 years)
555932 Points ∼55% -45%
AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
72572 Points ∼100% +1086%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=131, last 2 years)
59805 Points ∼82% +877%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5783 - 96317, n=10)
21924 Points ∼30% +258%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points ∼9% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6121 Points ∼8%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points ∼8% -2%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6959 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (6007 - 7567, n=11)
6808 Points ∼98% +3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6799 Points ∼98% +3%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6584 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points ∼91% -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6007 Points ∼86% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (895 - 8124, n=170, last 2 years)
4244 Points ∼61% -36%
System
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11774 Points ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points ∼89% +5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10340 Points ∼88% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (9273 - 10990, n=11)
10216 Points ∼87% +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10006 Points ∼85% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9934 Points ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1542 - 19657, n=170, last 2 years)
7532 Points ∼64% -24%
Memory
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9044 Points ∼100% +66%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6523 Points ∼72% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (5125 - 7806, n=11)
6493 Points ∼72% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points ∼69% +14%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5437 Points ∼60%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5125 Points ∼57% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1012 - 9044, n=170, last 2 years)
4862 Points ∼54% -11%
Graphics
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21944 Points ∼100% +1%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21678 Points ∼99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (15216 - 22308, n=11)
20142 Points ∼92% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points ∼78% -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
15216 Points ∼69% -30%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13463 Points ∼61% -38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (478 - 25642, n=170, last 2 years)
7365 Points ∼34% -66%
Web
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1669 Points ∼100% +9%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1633 Points ∼98% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
  (1291 - 1888, n=11)
1624 Points ∼97% +6%
OnePlus 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1527 Points ∼91%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1444 Points ∼87% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points ∼86% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=170, last 2 years)
1386 Points ∼83% -9%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (77.3 - 126.3, n=12)
105.3 Points ∼100% +4%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
101.23 Points ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points ∼92% -4%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
84.1 Points ∼80% -17%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
63.2 Points ∼60% -38%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=170, last 2 years)
62.2 Points ∼59% -39%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
200 Points ∼100% +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (121.9 - 237, n=11)
195.6 Points ∼98% +24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
172.8 Points ∼86% +9%
OnePlus 10 Pro
158.342 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
147.5 Points ∼74% -7%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
124.5 Points ∼62% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=169, last 2 years)
114.8 Points ∼57% -27%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
129.3 runs/min ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=12)
104.5 runs/min ∼81% -19%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
73.5 runs/min ∼57% -43%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=156, last 2 years)
60.9 runs/min ∼47% -53%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
56 runs/min ∼43% -57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
193 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (101 - 193, n=11)
148.2 Points ∼77% -23%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points ∼69% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points ∼64% -36%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
119 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 4689)
103 Points ∼53% -47%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 265, n=179, last 2 years)
92.1 Points ∼48% -52%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
49343 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=12)
40720 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points ∼78% -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points ∼69% -31%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
29750 Points ∼60% -40%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
26829 Points ∼54% -46%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=184, last 2 years)
23301 Points ∼47% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 15230, n=184, last 2 years)
3172 ms * ∼100% -285%
OnePlus 9 Pro (Microsoft Edge 46)
1808 ms * ∼57% -120%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)
1330 ms * ∼42% -62%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * ∼40% -53%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * ∼35% -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (819 - 1440, n=12)
1033 ms * ∼33% -25%
OnePlus 10 Pro (Chrome100)
823.5 ms * ∼26%

* ... smaller is better

OnePlus 10 ProOnePlus 9 ProOppo Find X5 ProXiaomi 12 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-7%
-24%
26%
1%
-4%
-46%
Sequential Read 256KB
1602.12
1995
25%
1410
-12%
1620
1%
1653
3%
1781 ?(1330 - 2037, n=47)
11%
929 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=248, last 2 years)
-42%
Sequential Write 256KB
1253.34
769
-39%
894
-29%
1465
17%
1074
-14%
954 ?(452 - 1559, n=47)
-24%
472 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=248, last 2 years)
-62%
Random Read 4KB
284.34
258.7
-9%
183.7
-35%
324.9
14%
322.3
13%
265 ?(181 - 345, n=47)
-7%
166.5 ?(13.5 - 345, n=248, last 2 years)
-41%
Random Write 4KB
264.45
254.3
-4%
210.4
-20%
448.9
70%
273.1
3%
274 ?(218 - 458, n=48)
4%
159.7 ?(56.5 - 458, n=249, last 2 years)
-40%

Gaming - OnePlus 10 Pro only manages 60 fps

We took a closer look at gaming performance with GameBench using game titles from the Play Store. With its touch sampling rate of up to 1,000 Hz, the OnePlus 10 Pro could be an exciting gaming smartphone, especially for ambitious gamers. There is also a HyperBoost mode, which temporarily speeds up GPU and CPU clocking, and a GPA frame stabilizer.
In everyday use, however, the OnePlus smartphone's gaming ambitions are put to the test. Apart from the noticeably high waste heat, the system limitations that we observed in the GFX benchmark are also evident in Android games:
The shooter PUBG mobile, for which the Ultra HD setting can be selected, ran smoothly with 40 fps at the highest details. However, the full 120 Hz of the OLED panel are not available at high or low graphics.
In Armajet, the 10 Pro also only managed 60 fps, although the arena shooter should be able to support the full 120 Hz of the OLED panel. The Adreno 730 is nominally one of the strongest graphics units, so there were no visible frame rate drops in our measurements. 

Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
Test OnePlus 10 Pro Smartphone
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet: Ø60 (56-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø59.7 (57-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø59.6 (50-61)
; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.2 (53-61)
; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.7 (35-41)

Emissions - OnePlus smartphone gets warm

Temperature

The GFX Bench app cannot be read
The GFX Bench app cannot be read

According to the manufacturer, the OnePlus 10 Pro has better heat dissipation than previous flagship OnePlus phones had. In our load scenario, the case occasionaly becomes very warm, uncomfortably hot even, according to benchmark tests. It will be interesting to see whether the heat development has a negative impact on the inside.  

We used the GFXBench battery test to check the behavior of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 under sustained load. The test was completed successfully, but we could not obtain the values without the app closing. 

The 3DMark stress tests performed better. Here we get values of 69 to 73 percent, which attests to the OnePlus smartphone's relatively inconstant performance. But the competition doesn't perform any better either. 

Max. Load
 43.2 °C
110 F
41.7 °C
107 F
39.2 °C
103 F
 
 43.1 °C
110 F
41.6 °C
107 F
39 °C
102 F
 
 43.2 °C
110 F
41.7 °C
107 F
39 °C
102 F
 
Maximum: 43.2 °C = 110 F
Average: 41.3 °C = 106 F
36 °C
97 F
39.3 °C
103 F
37.2 °C
99 F
36.7 °C
98 F
39.9 °C
104 F
39.2 °C
103 F
36.7 °C
98 F
40.2 °C
104 F
42.5 °C
109 F
Maximum: 42.5 °C = 109 F
Average: 38.6 °C = 101 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 21.2 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 (41.6min) % ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (37.2min) % ∼90% -10%
OnePlus 9 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.3 (3461min) % ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 (25.9min) % ∼84% -16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47.2 (27.4min) % ∼68% -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
OnePlus 10 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.1 (11.3min) % ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 (9.64min) % ∼86% -14%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 (7.76min) % ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi 12 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% ∼0% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø12.4 (11.3-15.5)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.64-15.4)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø9.2 (7.76-12.6)
OnePlus 10 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø45.4 (41.6-60)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø41.7 (37.2-59.4)
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.8 (27.4-58)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (25.9-44.2)
Heatmap - front
Heatmap - front
Heatmap - back
Heatmap - back

Speakers

The dual speakers of the OnePlus 10 Pro are significantly louder than those of its predecessor, but the increase in volume is accompanied by slightly less linear playback. The two speakers lack depth compared to other flagships, such as the Galaxy S22 Ultra. We still like the sound experience, even though the deep sound ranges are reproduced too thinly and high tones are not very present. 
Headphones or external speakers can be connected via the USB-C port. Those who prefer to use Bluetooth for wireless output can fall back on the audio codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptXHD and aptX adaptive as well as LDAC and LHDC.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.536.22535.538.23131.731.74030.835.15032.242.86325.131.38019.422.310020.923.612517.626.516015.839.9200134725011.752.631510.660.540010.563.850011.968.263013.871.880015.475.6100012.775.912501675.9160012.477.6200011.677.8250013.179.6315013.176.6400013.777.8500014.271.4630014.773800015.376.21000015.974.21250016.564.91600017.161.9SPL26.188.1N0.774.6median 13.8median 71.8Delta1.810.93533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 69.31.111.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 10 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - OnePlus 10 Pro with 5,000 mAh

Power Consumption

The battery of the OnePlus 10 Pro has a capacity of 5,000 mAh and supports SUPERVOOC rapid charging technology with up to 80 watts. Fortunately, the appropiate power charger is included with the smartphone, with which the charging process lasts a little over 30 minutes. So the charging speed has increased slightly compared to the OnePlus 9 Pro. The OnePlus 10 Pro also supports wireless charging with up to 50 watts.
Overall, the power consumption is on a similar level to an Oppo Find X5 Pro. Interestingly, the Oppo smartphone uses significantly less energy at peak than the OnePlus 10 Pro. This is also evident in GFXBench.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.7 / 1.1 / 1.7 Watt
Load midlight 6.4 / 11.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
OnePlus 10 Pro
5000 mAh
OnePlus 9 Pro
4500 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 12 Pro
4600 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-49%
-1%
3%
15%
-44%
-6%
Idle Minimum *
0.7
1.6
-129%
1.24
-77%
0.94
-34%
0.58
17%
1.44 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=10)
-106%
0.91 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=193, last 2 years)
-30%
Idle Average *
1.1
2
-82%
1.39
-26%
1.24
-13%
0.71
35%
2.19 ?(1.1 - 4.38, n=10)
-99%
1.669 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=193, last 2 years)
-52%
Idle Maximum *
1.7
2.4
-41%
1.42
16%
1.34
21%
1.16
32%
2.41 ?(1.34 - 4.45, n=10)
-42%
1.896 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=193, last 2 years)
-12%
Load Average *
6.4
6.2
3%
3.58
44%
5.7
11%
7.07
-10%
5.89 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=10)
8%
4.48 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=193, last 2 years)
30%
Load Maximum *
11.3
11
3%
6.99
38%
8.12
28%
11.32
-0%
9.04 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=10)
20%
7.33 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=193, last 2 years)
35%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
OnePlus 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.31 (1.89-11.3)
Oppo Find X5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.27 (0.963-10.9)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910