Oppo RX17 Neo
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 25 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 13 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo RX17 Neo
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThis is a tricky one to judge. There are parts of the Oppo RX17 Neo we love, like its excellent battery life and bold screen. However, charging that is both slow and micro USB-based seems totally out of place in 2019, and at the price you can get metal and glass phones. They feel more impressive, although Oppo has done a good job of making plastic look like glass here. Your hands won’t be too easily fooled, though. Buy this if battery life is your top priority, and you’ve been put off Huawei and Honor phones recently.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak
Archive.org versionAt the start of April a review of a sibling unit to this one can be found on Gadgetspeak. So here what is quite a similar product on the face of it, however there are surprises like a fingerprint reader that is normally invisible on the screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; long battery life; nice display; impressive fingerprint sensor; nice cameras. Negative: No NFC; no USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Le monde numerique
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Product Test
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 84% mobility: 86%
Source: Helpix
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: i2Hard
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Big screen; bright display; good cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; decent hardware; separate memory card slot. Negative: No NFC; only microUSB port; plastic case; high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Mega Obzor
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Face ID; frameless; beautiful design; nice display; decent hardware; great main camera. Negative: No NFC; poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 512: Integrated graphics card based on the Adreno 500 architecture, like the Adreno 520 in the Snapdragon 820. According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?). Supports DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 660: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2.2 GHz cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz cores) and a rather slow Adreno 512 GPU. Manufactured in a 14 nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
