Oppo RX Series

Graphics Adapter: unknown, Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 6.40 inch, 6.41 inch
Weight: 0.156kg, 0.183kg
Average of 37 scores (from 53 reviews)
Oppo RX17 Pro
Specifications

Processor: unknown
Graphics Adapter: unknown
Display: 6.40 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.183kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Stuff TV

Look beyond the RX17 Pro's spangly two-tone colour scheme and it's tough to spot any real substance - it feels like a decent mid-range phone that's hamstrung by a few superfluous features and out-of-date software.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: What Mobile

The RX17 Pro is a good smartphone for those looking for a host of new technologies, such as in-screen fingerprint sensors and face-unlocking, plus some key basics such as long battery life with fast charging and a beautiful design. But there are better and cheaper options out there, such as the Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro and the OnePlus 6T.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Know Your Mobile

It's a close battle between this and the OnePlus 6T, and while Oppo's phone is weaker in some respects, it has a more eye-catching design and a cool ToF camera. Still, for the asking price, there are arguably better options available.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Oppo RX17 Pro is a solid phone from Oppo. It looks smart, modern and, unlike some previous Oppo models, isn’t weird or a tech try-hard; it’s the ideal device for its first foray in the UK market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor

The Oppo RX17 Pro is a more attractive phone for the European market than was the Find X. A gimmicky sliding camera makes way for a solid device that costs less, has a great display and a refreshing, premium design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint

In a market where the OnePlus 6T exists, is fairly difficult to recommend the RX17 Pro, but on the whole it's a good all-round phone. Plus, it'll charge up faster than anything you've ever used before.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor

The RX17 Pro is a great looking phone with good performance and a lush display. But with a Snapdragon 710 rather than the better 845 it’s just impossible not to compare it to the OnePlus 6T which looks the same, has better software for the western market and, importantly, costs less.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena

Once again, the pricing of the Oppo R17 Pro puts it in a tough spot and makes it hard to recommend over the similarly-priced competition. Especially when the competition consists almost entirely of flagship models. Perhaps over the course of few months, the Oppo R17 Pro will get cheaper and it will be worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Trusted Reviews

The RX17 Pro could be considered a high-end entry into the mid-range, but with the wealth of functionality Oppo has squeezed in here, there’s every reason to compare it against 2018’s flagship handsets. What remains is how well all these promising features play out in real-world use and whether or not the phone has the stones to compete with more classically-styled flagships in the field of performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: GSM Arena

The RX17 Pro is priced closely to the OnePlus 6T, which has the cutting-edge Snadpragon 845 to brag with, while the RX17 Pro will be relying on eye-catching looks, a better fingerprint scanner, and hopefully, a more versatile camera. And things do look promising right now!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Pocket Lint

As the RX17 Pro is just over the OnePlus 6T’s €550 price point this is definitely a phone to keep an eye on. Many will prefer to get the 6T, although Oppo believes it is aiming at a more discerning market than OnePlus, hence the slightly more expensive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 70% display: 86% mobility: 81%
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 90% workmanship: 93%
Source: Movil Zona

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Zona Movilidad

Positive: Good price; nice design; excellent cameras; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/24/2019
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Good price; solid workmanship; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Xataka

Positive: Good price; powerful processor; nice design; impressive fingerprint reader; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 52% features: 82%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 71% display: 89% mobility: 84% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Everyeye.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 76% features: 83% display: 84% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 73%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare

Positive: Decent hardware; nice design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: Androidiani

Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; decent cameras; fast charging. Negative: High price; no stereo speaker; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it

Positive: Nice design; great built quality; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Fast system; long battery life; quick charging; decent cameras; nice display; good hardware. Negative: Average speakers; poor cameras; high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Positive: Attractive design; nice display; fast charging; good face ID; impressive cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ferra.ru

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: DGL.ru

Positive: Excellent cameras; fast charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Oppo RX17 Neo
Specifications

Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 660
Graphics Adapter: Qualcomm Adreno 512
Display: 6.41 inch, 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixels
Weight: 0.156kg
Links:
Price comparison
Average Score:
Reviews
Source: Techradar

This is a tricky one to judge. There are parts of the Oppo RX17 Neo we love, like its excellent battery life and bold screen. However, charging that is both slow and micro USB-based seems totally out of place in 2019, and at the price you can get metal and glass phones. They feel more impressive, although Oppo has done a good job of making plastic look like glass here. Your hands won’t be too easily fooled, though. Buy this if battery life is your top priority, and you’ve been put off Huawei and Honor phones recently.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/16/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Gadgetspeak

At the start of April a review of a sibling unit to this one can be found on Gadgetspeak. So here what is quite a similar product on the face of it, however there are surprises like a fingerprint reader that is normally invisible on the screen.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 05/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Good price; long battery life; nice display; impressive fingerprint sensor; nice cameras. Negative: No NFC; no USB-C.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/16/2018
Source: Tablets Magazine

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/24/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/15/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Le monde numerique

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/02/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/27/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 95% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Product Test

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 84% mobility: 86%
Source: Helpix

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: i2Hard

Positive: Big screen; bright display; good cameras; fast fingerprint sensor; decent hardware; separate memory card slot. Negative: No NFC; only microUSB port; plastic case; high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/13/2018
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Face ID; frameless; beautiful design; nice display; decent hardware; great main camera. Negative: No NFC; poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2018
Comment
Oppo:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
unknown:
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
Qualcomm Adreno 512: Integrated graphics card based on the Adreno 500 architecture, like the Adreno 520 in the Snapdragon 820. According to Qualcomm up to 30% faster than the previous generation (Adreno 510?). Supports DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
:
Qualcomm Snapdragon:
SD 660: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2.2 GHz cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz cores) and a rather slow Adreno 512 GPU. Manufactured in a 14 nm process.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
No weight comment found (one expected)!
76.24%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.