Oppo RX17 Pro
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 27 scores (from 40 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo RX17 Pro
Source: Stuff TV Archive.org version
Look beyond the RX17 Pro's spangly two-tone colour scheme and it's tough to spot any real substance - it feels like a decent mid-range phone that's hamstrung by a few superfluous features and out-of-date software.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: What Mobile Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is a good smartphone for those looking for a host of new technologies, such as in-screen fingerprint sensors and face-unlocking, plus some key basics such as long battery life with fast charging and a beautiful design. But there are better and cheaper options out there, such as the Xiaomi Mi 8 Pro and the OnePlus 6T.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Know Your Mobile Archive.org version
It's a close battle between this and the OnePlus 6T, and while Oppo's phone is weaker in some respects, it has a more eye-catching design and a cool ToF camera. Still, for the asking price, there are arguably better options available.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
The Oppo RX17 Pro is a solid phone from Oppo. It looks smart, modern and, unlike some previous Oppo models, isn’t weird or a tech try-hard; it’s the ideal device for its first foray in the UK market.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The Oppo RX17 Pro is a more attractive phone for the European market than was the Find X. A gimmicky sliding camera makes way for a solid device that costs less, has a great display and a refreshing, premium design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
In a market where the OnePlus 6T exists, is fairly difficult to recommend the RX17 Pro, but on the whole it's a good all-round phone. Plus, it'll charge up faster than anything you've ever used before.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is a great looking phone with good performance and a lush display. But with a Snapdragon 710 rather than the better 845 it’s just impossible not to compare it to the OnePlus 6T which looks the same, has better software for the western market and, importantly, costs less.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/08/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
Once again, the pricing of the Oppo R17 Pro puts it in a tough spot and makes it hard to recommend over the similarly-priced competition. Especially when the competition consists almost entirely of flagship models. Perhaps over the course of few months, the Oppo R17 Pro will get cheaper and it will be worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro could be considered a high-end entry into the mid-range, but with the wealth of functionality Oppo has squeezed in here, there’s every reason to compare it against 2018’s flagship handsets. What remains is how well all these promising features play out in real-world use and whether or not the phone has the stones to compete with more classically-styled flagships in the field of performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The RX17 Pro is priced closely to the OnePlus 6T, which has the cutting-edge Snadpragon 845 to brag with, while the RX17 Pro will be relying on eye-catching looks, a better fingerprint scanner, and hopefully, a more versatile camera. And things do look promising right now!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
As the RX17 Pro is just over the OnePlus 6T’s €550 price point this is definitely a phone to keep an eye on. Many will prefer to get the 6T, although Oppo believes it is aiming at a more discerning market than OnePlus, hence the slightly more expensive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Foreign Reviews
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/07/2019
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 87% features: 70% display: 86% mobility: 81%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 85% display: 93% mobility: 90% workmanship: 93%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; excellent cameras; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/24/2019
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; solid workmanship; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/30/2019
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful processor; nice design; impressive fingerprint reader; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 52% features: 82%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/20/2018
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 71% display: 89% mobility: 84% workmanship: 85%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 70% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 85% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 78%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% price: 76% features: 83% display: 84% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 73%
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent hardware; nice design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/27/2018
Source: Androidiani IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; nice performance; decent cameras; fast charging. Negative: High price; no stereo speaker; unsupported waterproof and dust avoiding.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/26/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice design; great built quality; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/05/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: XGN NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Fast system; long battery life; quick charging; decent cameras; nice display; good hardware. Negative: Average speakers; poor cameras; high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/25/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/01/2019
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive design; nice display; fast charging; good face ID; impressive cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/06/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Ferra.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; fast charging. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2018
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.40":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.76%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.