Realme C75
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 37 reviews)
Reviews for the Realme C75
Source: Manila Shaker

The realme C75 delivered acceptable gaming performance despite being marketed for its durability rather than gaming. It handles Mobile Legends and Wild Rift well but struggles with graphically demanding games. If you’re looking for an affordable, durable smartphone that can handle casual gaming priced at PHP 8,999 for the 8GB RAM + 128GB storage, and PHP 10,999 for the 8GB RAM + 256GB storage realme C75 is a solid choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/21/2025
Source: Manila Shaker

Would we recommend it? Yes, but for a specific audience. Most users prioritize raw performance or camera capabilities when selecting a smartphone. However, if you need an affordable secondary device that can withstand various activities and don’t mind the lack of 5G connectivity, the realme C75 is a solid choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2025
Source: Speed Magazine

“Rugged” and “classy” might seem like an unlikely pair, but realme somehow made it work with the C75. Combining top-notch durability with overall smooth performance, the realme C75 is a great option for anyone who needs a tough phone that can handle daily wear and tear. If you’re tired of constantly worrying about damaging your device, the C75 is definitely worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/03/2025
Source: Unbox

While we acknowledge the improved water resistance and overall durability on the C75, it falls short when it comes to performance–realme could have opted to use a processor other than the Helio G92, which is barely different from the Helio G80 used by its predecessor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/23/2025
Source: Root Nation

The realme C75 offers a new approach to durability at an affordable price. It features a 6.72-inch IPS display with Full HD+ resolution and a 90Hz refresh rate. The phone is powered by the MediaTek Helio G92 Max processor, with 8GB of RAM (expandable) and up to 256GB of storage. The 50MP main camera performs well in good lighting, and the 8MP front camera takes decent selfies. The device is water- and dust-resistant (IP68, IP69K) and has a military-grade MIL-STD-810H durability certification. The 5828 mAh battery lasts for two days of use. The design is simple yet elegant, especially in the yellow color, which subtly shifts in the light. The device weighs 196g and is fairly comfortable to use, though it’s difficult to operate with one hand due to the screen size.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/10/2025
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 100% performance: 90% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Hitech Century

The realme C75 stands out as a budget phone on account of its exceptional durability, large battery and modest RM699 price point. If you can live with the middling camera setup, 4G connectivity and relatively short 2 years of OS and security updates, this makes for an ideal as a starter phone for younger users and those who simply need something sufficiently capable to handle modern tasks like calling a Grab, getting about with Waze and the like. The realme C75 is ideal for the butter- fingered user on a tight budget as it offers exceptional durability as well as acceptable performance for its sub-RM700 price point with the bundled free casing and charger adding substantially to its value.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/22/2024
Rating: Total score: 64% price: 80% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: KL Gadget Guy

The realme C75 might not be an exciting phone for most of us, but it is no doubt a great choice for people that require ruggedness on a smartphone without spending too much of their paycheck, which compared to actual rugged smartphones, this phone at least looks sleek and comes with a polished software that you will be confident of using every day, it ultimately depends on how much you care about water and drop resistance on your phone, because if you have RM699 to spend on a new smartphone, there are just too many choices out there.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Smartzone

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2025
Rating: Total score: 73% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2025
Rating: Total score: 77%
Source: Smart World

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 79% price: 75% features: 75% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2025
Rating: features: 75%
Source: Batista70Phone

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 60% display: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Evo smart

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 60% performance: 50% display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Ceotech

Positive: Powerful hardware; high performance; great cameras; excellent battery life; tough device; affordable price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/21/2025
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2025
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 60% display: 70% mobility: 60% workmanship: 80%
Source: Les Numeriques

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2025
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 60%
Source: Charles Tech

Positive: Tough device; decent performance; impressive autonomy; affordable price. Negative Unsupported 5G; average display.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2025
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 50% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70%
Source: GSM Maniak

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2025
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: ITHardware.pl

Positive: Modern design; waterproof IP69; tough device; long battery life; quick 45W charging; dual SIM and microSD card slot; nice main camera. Negative: Poor video recording; low performance; IPS panel; unsupported 5G; mediocre speakers; lack of headphone jack; no charger included; very high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/01/2025
Source: Techno Senior

Positive: Premium design; great built quality; tough device; high mobility.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2025
Source: Co Nowego

Positive: Big screen; smooth display; large battery capacity; quick charging; NFC module; USB-C port; dual SIM; waterproof IP69. Negative: Average gaming performance; poor cameras; lack of headphone jack; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2025
Source: GSM Online PL

Positive: Tough device; waterproof IP69 and dust avoiding; large battery capacity. Negative: Poor display; average cameras; mediocre speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2025
Source: Instalki

Positive: Tough device; waterproof and dust avoiding; large battery capacity; microSD card slot; dual SIM; NFC module; affordable price. Negative: Many bloatwares; mono speakers; no charger included; unsupported 5G; low performance; average display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/21/2025
Source: Unite4buy

Positive: Waterproof IP68; modern design; big screen; nice display; large battery capacity; quick 45W charging. Negative: Average cameras; mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/30/2024
Source: Ferra.ru

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/18/2025
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 3DNews.ru

Positive: Support waterproof IP69; big screen; nice display; long battery life; quick charging; microSD card slot; dual SIM. Negative: Poor night shots; average selfie camera; mono speakers; lack of headphone jack; many bloatwares.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/19/2025
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Positive: Very long battery life; tough device; stereo speakers; quick 45W charging. Negative: Average gaming performance; mediocre display; without headphone jack.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/13/2025
Source: 3DNews.ru

Positive: Tough device; waterproof IP69; large battery capacity; big screen; MicroSD card slot; nice main camera; elegant design. Negative: Average processor; no headphone jack; mono speakers; poor secondary camera.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/12/2025
Source: Notebook.ru

Positive: Tough device; waterproof IP68/IP69; big screen; sharp display; decent performance; large battery capacity; affordable price. Negative: Mediocre speakers; average cameras; no headphone jack; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/23/2025
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Beautiful display; big screen; powerful processor; high performance; large battery capacity; impressive cameras. Negative: Plastic case; unsupported 5G.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 12/26/2024
Source: VNReview

Positive: Good price; great autonomy; quick charging; waterproof IP69; tough device.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/27/2024
Source: Selular

Positive: Nice design; waterproof; decent hardware; impressive battery life; good cameras; attractive promotion. Negative: Unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2024
Source: Root Nation CN

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/09/2025
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Arena IT

Positive: Waterproof IP69; tough device; very long battery life; quick 45W charging; decent hardware; good performance; nice speakers. Negative: Poor night shots; average display.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/19/2025
Source: Computerblog.ro

Positive: Long battery life; decent cameras; good price; waterproof and dust avoiding. Negative: Average performance; old design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/19/2025
Comment
unknown:
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.72":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.72.86%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.