Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Motorola Edge 20 Lite review: Low-priced 5G smartphone with 108 MP camera & 90 Hz OLED

A deceptive package? Motorola's Edge 20 Lite is an interesting mid-range phone on paper. The cheapest smartphone in the Edge 20 series has some features from the Edge 20 Pro, but the spec sheet belies some shortcomings.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a relatively inexpensive 5G smartphone (RRP: 370 Euros/~$429) that is equipped with a MediaTek chipset and 8 GB of working memory. Furthermore, the mid-range phone supports the in-house Ready For platform and can be recharged quite quickly thanks to 30-watt TurboPower technology.

At first glance, the Edge 20 Lite is thus a slightly reduced version of the larger model brothers Edge 20 and Edge 20 Pro. The Lite version of the Edge 20 series has the same 108 MP main camera and the 32 MP front-facing camera is also identical on the spec sheet. The resolution and dimensions of the 6.7-inch OLED screen are also the same as those of the Edge 20 Pro. However, our review reveals some significant differences between the Edge models, even where you would not expect it.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! English native speakers welcome!

News Writer (AUS/NZL based) - Details here

German-English-Translator - Details here (English native speakers preferred)

 

 

 

 

Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Edge Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 720 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 385 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3,5-mm-Headset-Jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (shared, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, Miracast, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: GSM-Netz 2/3/5/8; 3G: WCDMA-Netz 1/2/4/5/8/19; 4G: LTE-Netz 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/34/38/39/40/41/42/43/66; 5G: n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n77/n78/n66, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 166 x 76 ( = 0.31 x 6.54 x 2.99 in)
Battery
5000 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (1/1,52", ƒ/1,9-Blende, Pixelgröße 0,7 µm) + 8-MP-Ultra-Weitwinkel (118°-Sichtfeld, ƒ/2,2-Blende, Pixelgröße 1,12 µm) + 2-MP-Tiefenkamera
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (ƒ/2,25-Blende)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, charge, USB-cable, case, MyUI, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L1, SAR:1.0W/​kg Head, 1.49W/​kg Body, fanless
Weight
185 g ( = 6.53 oz / 0.41 pounds), Power Supply: 93 g ( = 3.28 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
370 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.2 %
11/2021
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
185 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
85.7 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
SD 780G 5G, Adreno 642
159 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.55"2400x1080
82.6 %
05/2021
Samsung Galaxy A52
SD 720G, Adreno 618
189 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
85.9 %
05/2021
Xiaomi Poco F3
SD 870, Adreno 650
196 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
84.9 %
08/2021
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
83.7 %
09/2021
realme GT Master Edition
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642
180 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080

Case - Edge 20 Lite with Punch-Hole

Motorola Edge 20 Lite in Lagoon Green
Motorola Edge 20 Lite in Lagoon Green

The Edge 20 Lite's casing made of glass and plastic convinces with a good build quality and an appealing feel. Representatives of the mid-range with glass backs, like the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G feel even more satisfying. Nevertheless, we do not find the PMMA material used in Motorola's phone, a transparent thermoplastic material, cheap.

The physical buttons of the Edge 20 Lite are a bit more ergonomically arranged than on the Pro model Pro model, nevertheless, the on/off button including the fingerprint sensor could have been placed a bit lower.

Despite the relatively high battery capacity of 5000 mAh, the mid-range smartphone is only 8.25 mm (~0.33 in) thin and 185 g (~6.5 oz) light. It has a 2.5D glass with an anti-fingerprint coating on the front. Motorola does not provide more detailed information here. The flat OLED panel is bordered by relatively wide edges. The size ratio between the display and the front of the device is thus only a solid 83 percent. For comparison, the display area ratio of the Redmi Note 10 Pro is more efficient at 86 percent.

The Edge 20 Lite has an official IP certification according to IP52. The water-repellent coating protects the casing from rain and sweat from the inside and outside. However, the construction is not waterproof.

Motorola Edge 20 Lite in Electric Graphite
Motorola Edge 20 Lite in Electric Graphite
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

Size comparison

166 mm / 6.54 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 76.4 mm / 3.01 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 196 g0.4321 lbs159.9 mm / 6.3 inch 75.1 mm / 2.96 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 inch 73.5 mm / 2.89 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 73.3 mm / 2.89 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs160.53 mm / 6.32 inch 75.72 mm / 2.98 inch 6.81 mm / 0.2681 inch 159 g0.3505 lbs
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Features - Motorola phone with 3.5 mm jack

The internal storage has a capacity of 128 GB, but the user only has 104 GB available in the state of delivery. Various data (photos, music, ...) can be stored on the external medium via an inserted microSDXC card, and the UFS storage can be expanded by up to 1 TB.

The Edge 20 Lite's other technical features include an FM radio and a 3.5 mm jack. In addition, peripherals like USB sticks can be connected via the USB-C port, which supports the 2.0 standard, using an OTG adapter. The wireless transmission of display content via Miracast to external monitors works smoothly in the test.

A real always-on function for notification inputs has to be waived despite the OLED technology. However, Motorola equips its mid-range smartphone with the well-known preview display feature, where messages are displayed when the smartphone is lifted. However, the manufacturer does not allow the user to leave the display permanently on.

Right side of housing (keys)
Right side of housing (keys)
Upper housing side (microphone)
Upper housing side (microphone)
Bottom case (speaker, microphone, USB port, 3.5 mm jack)
Bottom case (speaker, microphone, USB port, 3.5 mm jack)
Left side of housing (special key)
Left side of housing (special key)

microSD card reader

The Edge 20 Lite cannot come close to using the maximum speed of our reference card Angelbird V60 (280 MB/s; 160 MB/s); we measure a data transfer rate of just 15 MB/s. Furthermore, we check the SD card slot with the CPD test. Here, Motorola's phone reveals decent read and write speeds on par with the mid-range competition.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
52.4 MB/s ∼100% +261%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
40.85 MB/s ∼78% +182%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
18.08 MB/s ∼35% +25%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
14.5 MB/s ∼28%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Edge 20 Lite Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø36.2 (26.9-43.1)
Samsung Galaxy A52 Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write: Ø34 (25-46.3)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø69.3 (32.1-79.4)
Samsung Galaxy A52 Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read: Ø78.2 (55.2-84.6)

Software - Motorola smartphone with Android 11

Ready-for features of the Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Ready-for features of the Motorola Edge 20 Lite

Motorola offers a clean and well-optimized system interface with MyUX. Only Facebook is preinstalled by third-party providers besides Google applications. Our sample runs the Android version 11 with the security patches from September 2021 during the test

Like the flagship Edge 20 Pro, Motorola's mid-range supports the Ready For platform. With the help of the Ready For PC functionality, the Edge 20 Lite can use smartphone apps, but also PC files on a large screen - but this requires special software that has to be installed once on the PC beforehand. The Edge 20 Lite is then connected with a USB-C cable. The Edge 20 Lite does not support a wireless connection with a Miracast-enabled screen like the Pro model. Wired output to external monitors also only works with the Edge 20 Pro thanks to the Display Port 1.4 standard.

Beyond the ready-for functionality, the MyUX UI offers Motorola's hardware and software security features called ThinkShield for Mobile. This is a platform based on Lenovo's ThinkShield brand, which is supposed to offer special protection against malware, phishing and network attacks.

The Edge 20 Lite's Camera2 API is available with "FULL" and streaming content can be viewed in HD quality thanks to DRM Widevine L1.


Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

Communication and GNSS - Edge 20 Lite with 5G

The transmission rates in the home network are very inconsistent with the inexpensive Edge 20 phone. The Edge 20 Lite's WLAN module, which supports the IEEE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac standards, uses both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency bands, but the speed we measured is below average. The transfer rates in our WLAN test are very fluctuating with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12. The transfer rates sometimes drop to about 2 MBit/s, which is very unusual for a modern smartphone.

Besides the slow Wi-Fi, the manufacturer relies on dual-SIM and Bluetooth version 5.0 for the communication modules. An NFC chip for near field communication and contactless payment is also on board.

Thanks to the Dimensity 720 SoC the Motorola phone has an integrated 5G modem (sub-6 GHz). Access to the LTE network including many supported 4G frequencies is also guaranteed, which is rather exceptional in the price range of the inexpensive Edge smartphone. A total of 24 LTE bands, including all frequencies relevant for local use, are covered. Users of the Edge 20 Lite are even well prepared for a stay abroad, such as a trip to the USA or India.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
891 (847min - 921max) MBit/s ∼100% +366%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (842min - 904max) MBit/s ∼100% +365%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
884 (444min - 914max) MBit/s ∼99% +363%
realme GT Master Edition
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
677 (642min - 697max) MBit/s ∼76% +254%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=285, last 2 years)
476 MBit/s ∼53% +149%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
282 (141min - 293max) MBit/s ∼32% +48%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
191 (2min - 344max) MBit/s ∼21%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
877 (657min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +273%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Adreno 642, SD 780G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
874 (833min - 900max) MBit/s ∼100% +272%
realme GT Master Edition
Adreno 642, SD 778G 5G, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
812 (767min - 834max) MBit/s ∼93% +246%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Adreno 650, SD 870, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 (311min - 702max) MBit/s ∼75% +178%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=285, last 2 years)
468 MBit/s ∼53% +99%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
310 (271min - 334max) MBit/s ∼35% +32%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
235 MBit/s ∼27%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340Tooltip
Motorola Edge 20 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 720, ARM Mali-G57 MP3; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø243 (34-347)
Samsung Galaxy A52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Qualcomm Adreno 618; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø309 (271-334)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 720, ARM Mali-G57 MP3; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø198 (2-344)
Samsung Galaxy A52 Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Qualcomm Adreno 618; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø277 (141-293)
Outdoor GPS test
Outdoor GPS test
GPS test in the building
GPS test in the building

We check the tracking accuracy in practice on a short test route that is recorded with a Garmin Edge 520 for comparison purposes. There is a distance of about 60 meters (~66 yards) between the smartphone's GPS module and the navigation device at the end of the almost 4-kilometer (~2.5 mi) bike ride.

The deviations from the route are not too big, but the Edge 20 Lite does have some minor weaknesses. If you look at the details of the GPS recording, the Motorola phone is still well suited for car navigation due to the exact positioning accuracy.

The Edge 20 Lite uses the main satellite systems GPS (L1), GLONASS and Galileo (E1) as well as SBAS with an accuracy of up to one meter (~1.1 yards) for positioning. The positioning is quite accurate even indoors, but it is considerably slower.

Location Garmin Edge 520
Location Garmin Edge 520
Location Garmin Edge 520
Location Garmin Edge 520
Location Garmin Edge 520
Location Garmin Edge 520
Tracking Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Tracking Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Tracking Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Tracking Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Tracking Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Tracking Motorola Edge 20 Lite

Phone features and voice quality - Motorola phone with VoLTE

Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

The Edge 20 Lite has a decent voice quality, but the speech is somewhat quiet and muffled. Video calls via the installed front-facing camera also work smoothly in the test. The good call quality via the speaker, thanks to the two installed microphones, enables good communication with the Skype app.

The mid-range phone supports dual-SIM with two physical SIM cards. Call features like WLAN calling and VoLTE are also supported.

Cameras - Edge 20 Lite with 108 MP

Selfie with the Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Selfie with the Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Portrait mode of the Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Portrait mode of the Motorola Edge 20 Lite

The camera setup of the Edge 20 Lite consists of an electronically stabilized 108 MP main camera and an 8 MP ultra-wide-angle lens as well as a 2 MP depth camera. In terms of zoom qualities, the Lite model without a dedicated tele lens, has to compromise.

The pictures taken with the standard 9:1 pixel binning are sometimes nice to look at, but most photos look much too brightened and yellowish. The mid-range phone also has some problems with exposing bright image areas. The Edge 20 Lite uses the same Samsung ISOCELL HM2 image sensor as the Pro model, but the results are visibly worse. However, there is still some potential here with adjustments in the camera software.

However, Motorola's smartphone amazes with a very appealing sharpness, especially in very low light. Thanks to the f/1.9 aperture and the large 1/1.52-inch sensor, the illumination and also the light sensitivity are very good for this price range. Qualitative parallels to the Pro model are clearly visible here.

The ultra-wide-angle lens, on the other hand, is rather average and a big loss in quality compared to the 108 MP optics in terms of sharpness and details. However, the color tones fit the photographed subject much better with the 8 MP lens.

The same cannot truly be said of the 32 MP front-facing camera in the display hole. The camera setup, which is exactly the same on paper as in the Pro model, does not convince us much in the Lite version - not at all, actually. Photos with the Edge 20 Lite look very unnatural and lack the good image sharpness of the big brother. Skin tones also look artificial and distorted.

The front-facing camera only records videos in FHD resolution at up to 30 frames per second, although the Pro model had a 4K resolution option. 8K video recording is not possible with the 108 MP cam of the Edge 20 Lite, as the MediaTek SoC is does not supported it. However, the quality of moving pictures in UHD is satisfactory with the main camera, even though 60 fps is only available in the FHD option. The lack of a lens swap option during active recording is probably a bit annoying for some users.

Ultra wide angle
Ultra wide angle
108 MP main camera
8x zoom (max)
Macro mode
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightWide angle

Under controlled lighting conditions, the Edge 20 Lite reveals relatively high deviations with strongly brightened colors - we analyze the color representation with the ColorChecker Passport in comparison to the actual reference colors. The display performance is measured once in full studio lighting and once at 1 lux light intensity.

The test chart also looks a bit overlit and low in contrast, but the sharpness under defined artificial light is appealing.

ColorChecker
21.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
16 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 20 Lite: 14.3 ∆E min: 4.62 - max: 24.26 ∆E
ColorChecker
29 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
38 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.9 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
50.1 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
34.2 ∆E
73.2 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
79.3 ∆E
68.3 ∆E
50.6 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 20 Lite: 44.69 ∆E min: 13.55 - max: 79.34 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Edge 20 Lite with 30W power adapter

Power supply of the Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Power supply of the Motorola Edge 20 Lite

The Edge 20 Lite's scope of delivery includes a modular 30-watt power adapter, a USB cable (Type-C to Type-C) and a quick start guide. A protective cover was not included in our review sample, but according to the manufacturer, it will be delivered as standard.

The warranty is 24 months. Optional Motocare packages can be purchased, which include an extended warranty of 12 months (35 Euros/~$41) or accident protection for up to two years (95 Euros/~$110).

Input devices & operation - Motorola phone with FaceUnlock

Inputs on the 6.7-inch OLED panel are implemented smoothly thanks to 90 Hz. The fingerprint sensor is integrated in the power button of the Lite, just like in the other Edge 20 models. It responds reliably, but sometimes takes a bit longer until the finger is recognized. The sensor's recognition rate is good, though.

The screen can also be unlocked via biometric identification using the face. The face unlock function works satisfactorily, but this option is quite insecure due to the use of the front-facing camera.

Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone
Test Motorola Edge 20 Lite smartphone

Display - Motorola smartphone with OLED

Sub-pixel representation
Sub-pixel representation

For the entertainment experience, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite uses the same display as its siblings. At least that is how Motorola advertises its low-priced Edge smartphone in the corresponding press release. However, the OLED panel of the Edge 20 Lite only has one thing in common with the screen of the large Pro model namely the size of 6.7 inches with a resolution of 1080p.

While the upper-class phones of the Edge 20 series rely on a refresh rate of 144 Hz, the small Lite model has to make do with 90 Hz. The refresh rate is also not adaptive, which means that either 90 Hz or "normal" 60 Hz is available.

The Edge 20 Lite is also not on par with the Pro model in our measurements. The luminance of about 430 cd/m² that we measured cannot keep up with the comparison devices we chose. Especially the Xiaomi phones Mi 11 Lite 5G or Poco F3 shine almost twice as bright. This fact is not changed by another measurement with an evenly distributed proportion of dark to bright areas (APL50). Here, we can confirm a brightness of 447 cd/m².

To control the luminance, the Edge 20 Lite uses pulse width modulation (PWM) at a high frequency of 345 Hz.

420
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
420
cd/m²
450
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 452 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 428.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 420 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.15 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
143.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.233
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Samsung Galaxy A52
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Xiaomi Poco F3
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
realme GT Master Edition
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Screen
40%
40%
74%
19%
10%
Brightness middle
420
863
105%
694
65%
889
112%
594
41%
587
40%
Brightness
428
860
101%
696
63%
902
111%
594
39%
584
36%
Brightness Distribution
89
93
4%
98
10%
95
7%
99
11%
97
9%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.15
3.2
-2%
2
37%
0.9
71%
2.74
13%
4.06
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.1
5.2
27%
6.7
6%
1.9
73%
6
15%
6.28
12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4
3.9
2%
1.7
57%
1.3
67%
4.2
-5%
4.3
-8%
Gamma
2.233 99%
2.33 94%
2.1 105%
2.26 97%
2.278 97%
2.322 95%
CCT
7413 88%
7299 89%
6440 101%
6614 98%
7322 89%
7270 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 344.8 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 344.8 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 344.8 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20894 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

In contrast to the Moto series, Motorola installs an AMOLED screen in the Edge mid-range, where individual pixels can be completely disabled, resulting in an "absolute" black. Thus, the contrast is much more pronounced than, for example, in a Moto G100.

In our tests with the CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the Edge 20 Lite's display is calibrated satisfactorily. However, the panel only delivers quite low color deviations in the "Natural" profile. However, the Delta E values are outside the ideal range (~3) and are significantly higher than in the Pro model. The same applies to the color temperature in the profile "Saturated", which is clearly too cool with about 7500K, so the grayscale shows a minimal blue tint.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Saturated)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Saturated)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Natural)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Natural)
Color space (target color space: AbobeRGB, profile: Saturated)
Color space (target color space: AbobeRGB, profile: Saturated)
Color space (Target color space: P3, Profile: Saturated)
Color space (Target color space: P3, Profile: Saturated)
Color space (Target color space: sRGB, Profile: Saturated)
Color space (Target color space: sRGB, Profile: Saturated)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB, Profile: Saturated)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB, Profile: Saturated)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB, Profile: Natural)
Grayscale (Target color space: sRGB, Profile: Natural)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB, profile: Saturated)
Color saturation (target color space: sRGB, profile: Saturated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Daylight does not pose any problems for Motorola's phone under cloudy skies. However, the readability is severely limited in direct sunlight and the associated reflections on the glass surface.

The viewing angles are on a good level thanks to the installed OLED technology. Even at very flat viewing angles, the display content is quite color-accurate and vivid.

Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
Motorola Edge 20 Lite

Performance - Edge 20 Lite with MediaTek SoC

The Dimensity 720 used in the Edge 20 Lite is a Mediatek processor manufactured in a 7nm process. The CPU part integrates four fast Cortex-A76 cores (2 GHz) and four Cortex-A55 power-saving cores (2 GHz). The Dimensity 720 also integrates a Mali-G57 with three cores as a graphics card.

The system usually runs smoothly in simple applications in everyday use. However, small delays occur as soon as processes are executed in the background, for example app updates. The loading times are also a bit slow, but that could also be due to the WLAN data drops and less to the storage connection or the SoC.

In the benchmarks, the Edge 20 Lite is the weakest performing phone in our comparison. In the CPU tests, as well as the graphics-heavy benchmarks, the results of the Dimensity 720 are on the level of a Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. The Motorola phone's UFS storage connection cannot keep up with a Poco F3 or OnePlus North 2 either.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
511 Points ∼51%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
809 Points ∼81% +58%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
545 Points ∼55% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
998 Points ∼100% +95%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
809 Points ∼81% +58%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
791 Points ∼79% +55%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points ∼52% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (472 - 516, n=3)
500 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=268, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼61% +19%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1627 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2998 Points ∼89% +84%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1622 Points ∼48% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3368 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
2463 Points ∼73% +51%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2810 Points ∼83% +73%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points ∼49% +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1511 - 1638, n=3)
1592 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=268, last 2 years)
2068 Points ∼61% +27%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1637 Points ∼36%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2805 Points ∼62% +71%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1176 Points ∼26% -28%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3587 Points ∼80% +119%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4501 Points ∼100% +175%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2233 Points ∼50% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1418 - 1637, n=2)
1528 Points ∼34% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=174, last 2 years)
2221 Points ∼49% +36%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1584 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2809 Points ∼59% +77%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1226 Points ∼26% -23%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3606 Points ∼76% +128%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4726 Points ∼100% +198%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2218 Points ∼47% +40%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points ∼33% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1525 - 1584, n=3)
1549 Points ∼33% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=174, last 2 years)
2269 Points ∼48% +43%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
8694 Points ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
11218 Points ∼82% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
9241 Points ∼68% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
13610 Points ∼100% +57%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
8486 Points ∼62% -2%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9330 Points ∼69% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
8694 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 17085, n=96, last 2 years)
9927 Points ∼73% +14%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3783 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6989 Points ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3683 Points ∼53% -3%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6392 Points ∼91% +69%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points ∼50% -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3499 - 3783, n=3)
3601 Points ∼52% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=227, last 2 years)
3574 Points ∼51% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3948 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8588 Points ∼100% +118%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3853 Points ∼45% -2%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7189 Points ∼84% +82%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points ∼43% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3694 - 3948, n=3)
3816 Points ∼44% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=227, last 2 years)
4163 Points ∼48% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3283 Points ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4233 Points ∼92% +29%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3190 Points ∼69% -3%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4605 Points ∼100% +40%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points ∼66% -8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2730 - 3283, n=3)
3012 Points ∼65% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (677 - 5301, n=227, last 2 years)
2886 Points ∼63% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3859 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5587 Points ∼70% +45%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3783 Points ∼47% -2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7970 Points ∼100% +107%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6703 Points ∼84% +74%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points ∼42% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3377 - 3859, n=3)
3650 Points ∼46% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=257, last 2 years)
4486 Points ∼56% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4038 Points ∼34%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
8380 Points ∼70% +108%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
4005 Points ∼33% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12033 Points ∼100% +198%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7473 Points ∼62% +85%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points ∼29% -13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3497 - 4038, n=3)
3837 Points ∼32% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=257, last 2 years)
5845 Points ∼49% +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3102 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2567 Points ∼52% -17%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3167 Points ∼64% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
3653 Points ∼74% +18%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4926 Points ∼100% +59%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points ∼61% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3014 - 3102, n=3)
3045 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (651 - 6394, n=255, last 2 years)
3136 Points ∼64% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5098 Points ∼100% +92%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2577 Points ∼51% -3%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5062 Points ∼99% +91%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points ∼50% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2529 - 2653, n=3)
2586 Points ∼51% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=224, last 2 years)
2762 Points ∼54% +4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2537 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6087 Points ∼100% +140%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2450 Points ∼40% -3%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5215 Points ∼86% +106%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points ∼40% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2418 - 2537, n=3)
2493 Points ∼41% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=224, last 2 years)
2920 Points ∼48% +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3182 Points ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3144 Points ∼68% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3149 Points ∼69% -1%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4592 Points ∼100% +44%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points ∼66% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2765 - 3182, n=3)
2986 Points ∼65% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (688 - 5318, n=224, last 2 years)
2910 Points ∼63% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2745 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4478 Points ∼61% +63%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2727 Points ∼37% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7377 Points ∼100% +169%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5469 Points ∼74% +99%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼36% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2653 - 2745, n=3)
2686 Points ∼36% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=259, last 2 years)
3695 Points ∼50% +35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2637 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6148 Points ∼65% +133%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2620 Points ∼28% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9498 Points ∼100% +260%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5641 Points ∼59% +114%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points ∼27% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2561 - 2637, n=3)
2598 Points ∼27% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=259, last 2 years)
4347 Points ∼46% +65%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3189 Points ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2354 Points ∼48% -26%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3184 Points ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4140 Points ∼84% +30%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4942 Points ∼100% +55%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points ∼61% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2901 - 3189, n=3)
3042 Points ∼62% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (635 - 5793, n=259, last 2 years)
3164 Points ∼64% -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2537 Points ∼54%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4699 Points ∼100% +85%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2437 Points ∼52% -4%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4002 Points ∼85% +58%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points ∼51% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2410 - 2537, n=3)
2483 Points ∼53% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=196, last 2 years)
2663 Points ∼57% +5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2428 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5785 Points ∼100% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2373 Points ∼41% -2%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5332 Points ∼92% +120%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points ∼41% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2354 - 2461, n=3)
2414 Points ∼42% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=196, last 2 years)
2997 Points ∼52% +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2793 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2795 Points ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
2693 Points ∼96% -4%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2137 Points ∼76% -23%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points ∼94% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2631 - 2793, n=3)
2692 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=196, last 2 years)
2650 Points ∼95% -5%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1252 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3196 Points ∼75% +155%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1052 Points ∼25% -16%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4288 Points ∼100% +242%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4208 Points ∼98% +236%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2484 Points ∼58% +98%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points ∼29% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1233 - 1252, n=3)
1243 Points ∼29% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9927, n=139, last 2 years)
2974 Points ∼69% +138%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1226 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
3212 Points ∼75% +162%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1044 Points ∼24% -15%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
4271 Points ∼100% +248%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
4214 Points ∼99% +244%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
2488 Points ∼58% +103%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points ∼28% -2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1207 - 1226, n=3)
1216 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=136, last 2 years)
3079 Points ∼72% +151%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
364 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
865 Points ∼67% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
318 Points ∼25% -13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1223 Points ∼95% +236%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1283 Points ∼100% +252%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
692 Points ∼54% +90%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
364 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102 - 3080, n=87, last 2 years)
917 Points ∼71% +152%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
352 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
786 Points ∼63% +123%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
313 Points ∼25% -11%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1222 Points ∼97% +247%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1256 Points ∼100% +257%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
690 Points ∼55% +96%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
352 Points ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (101 - 4236, n=86, last 2 years)
927 Points ∼74% +163%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
58 fps ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
70 fps ∼78% +21%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
71 fps ∼79% +22%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
59 fps ∼66% +2%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
60 fps ∼67% +3%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps ∼61% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (55 - 60, n=3)
57.7 fps ∼64% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=211, last 2 years)
64.4 fps ∼72% +11%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
69 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
153 fps ∼77% +122%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
77 fps ∼39% +12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
200 fps ∼100% +190%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
178 fps ∼89% +158%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
134 fps ∼67% +94%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps ∼34% -3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (67 - 69, n=3)
68 fps ∼34% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 425, n=211, last 2 years)
122 fps ∼61% +77%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
47 fps ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼100% +68%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
37 fps ∼47% -21%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼76% +28%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
60 fps ∼76% +28%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
59 fps ∼75% +26%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼47% -21%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (37 - 54, n=3)
46 fps ∼58% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 121, n=210, last 2 years)
51.8 fps ∼66% +10%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
41 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
90 fps ∼73% +120%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
39 fps ∼31% -5%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
119 fps ∼96% +190%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
124 fps ∼100% +202%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
79 fps ∼64% +93%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼30% -10%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (37 - 41, n=3)
39.7 fps ∼32% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 251, n=211, last 2 years)
70.7 fps ∼57% +72%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼97% +138%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
27 fps ∼46% +13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +146%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
58 fps ∼98% +142%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼85% +108%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼41% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (24 - 51, n=3)
33 fps ∼56% +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=208, last 2 years)
40.3 fps ∼68% +68%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼33%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
65 fps ∼80% +141%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
31 fps ∼38% +15%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
81 fps ∼100% +200%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
77 fps ∼95% +185%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
57 fps ∼70% +111%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼33% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (26 - 27, n=3)
26.7 fps ∼33% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 169, n=209, last 2 years)
48.7 fps ∼60% +80%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
14 fps ∼32%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼80% +150%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
15 fps ∼34% +7%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +214%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
41 fps ∼93% +193%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
29 fps ∼66% +107%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps ∼30% -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (13 - 23, n=3)
16.7 fps ∼38% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=208, last 2 years)
25 fps ∼57% +79%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
40 fps ∼83% +135%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼35% 0%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
48 fps ∼100% +182%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
47 fps ∼98% +176%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
33 fps ∼69% +94%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼31% -12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (13 - 17, n=3)
15 fps ∼31% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=208, last 2 years)
29.2 fps ∼61% +72%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
42 fps ∼86% +180%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
17 fps ∼35% +13%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
49 fps ∼100% +227%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
48 fps ∼98% +220%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
31 fps ∼63% +107%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼31% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (15 - 30, n=3)
20 fps ∼41% +33%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=269, last 2 years)
25.8 fps ∼53% +72%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
50 fps ∼88% +194%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
19 fps ∼33% +12%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +235%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
54 fps ∼95% +218%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
35 fps ∼61% +106%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼30% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (17 - 17, n=3)
17 fps ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.9 - 257, n=269, last 2 years)
30.3 fps ∼53% +78%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.6 fps ∼29%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
26 fps ∼79% +171%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
11 fps ∼33% +15%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
33 fps ∼100% +244%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
31 fps ∼94% +223%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
20 fps ∼61% +108%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps ∼28% -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (9.2 - 17, n=3)
11.9 fps ∼36% +24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.1 - 60, n=270, last 2 years)
17.3 fps ∼52% +80%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼28%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
18 fps ∼82% +195%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
7.1 fps ∼32% +16%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
22 fps ∼100% +261%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
21 fps ∼95% +244%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
13 fps ∼59% +113%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼28% 0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (6.1 - 6.2, n=3)
6.13 fps ∼28% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.7 - 101, n=270, last 2 years)
11.7 fps ∼53% +92%
Antutu v9 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
325377 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
521880 Points ∼77% +60%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
343854 Points ∼51% +6%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
680139 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
604538 Points ∼89% +86%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
508662 Points ∼75% +56%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
 
325377 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (117053 - 962824, n=74, last 2 years)
505616 Points ∼74% +55%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
12743 Points ∼9%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6472 Points ∼5% -49%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
21348 Points ∼15% +68%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
111838 Points ∼80% +778%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
71083 Points ∼51% +458%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
140376 Points ∼100% +1002%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points ∼9% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (12331 - 13120, n=3)
12731 Points ∼9% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 264766, n=96, last 2 years)
65667 Points ∼47% +415%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2783 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5068 Points ∼80% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3287 Points ∼52% +18%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
6356 Points ∼100% +128%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
5130 Points ∼81% +84%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
4772 Points ∼75% +71%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points ∼47% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2735 - 3019, n=3)
2846 Points ∼45% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=195, last 2 years)
3938 Points ∼62% +42%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4183 Points ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
9557 Points ∼92% +128%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
5783 Points ∼56% +38%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
9997 Points ∼97% +139%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
9622 Points ∼93% +130%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
10333 Points ∼100% +147%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points ∼55% +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (4183 - 5692, n=3)
4957 Points ∼48% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=195, last 2 years)
7132 Points ∼69% +70%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3556 Points ∼46%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6172 Points ∼80% +74%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3845 Points ∼50% +8%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
7692 Points ∼100% +116%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7277 Points ∼95% +105%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
5425 Points ∼71% +53%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points ∼54% +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (3281 - 4185, n=3)
3674 Points ∼48% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=195, last 2 years)
4620 Points ∼60% +30%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2837 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
7202 Points ∼56% +154%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
3830 Points ∼30% +35%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
12801 Points ∼100% +351%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
7754 Points ∼61% +173%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
6681 Points ∼52% +135%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points ∼21% -5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (2687 - 2837, n=3)
2737 Points ∼21% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=195, last 2 years)
6294 Points ∼49% +122%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 20 Lite
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1382 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1563 Points ∼94% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A52
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G, Adreno 618, 8192
1371 Points ∼83% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 6144
1658 Points ∼100% +20%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 12288
1276 Points ∼77% -8%
realme GT Master Edition
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642, 8192
1385 Points ∼84% 0%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points ∼78% -6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720
  (1271 - 1382, n=3)
1317 Points ∼79% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=195, last 2 years)
1332 Points ∼80% -4%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
75.831 Points ∼100% +98%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
75.089 Points ∼99% +96%
realme GT Master Edition (Chrome 92)
67.986 Points ∼90% +78%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182, n=187, last 2 years)
55.2 Points ∼73% +44%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
54.419 Points ∼72% +42%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
51.066 Points ∼67% +33%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
38.283 Points ∼50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (34 - 38.3, n=3)
36.2 Points ∼48% -5%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
135.67 Points ∼100% +80%
realme GT Master Edition (Chrome 92)
134.2 Points ∼99% +78%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
108.77 Points ∼80% +44%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
105.4 Points ∼78% +40%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=196, last 2 years)
100 Points ∼74% +33%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
94.658 Points ∼70% +26%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
75.343 Points ∼56%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (67.3 - 75.3, n=3)
70.9 Points ∼52% -6%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
74.8 runs/min ∼100% +112%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
70.8 runs/min ∼95% +101%
realme GT Master Edition (Chome 92)
55 runs/min ∼74% +56%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 244, n=172, last 2 years)
54.1 runs/min ∼72% +53%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chome 92)
50.2 runs/min ∼67% +42%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
37.9 runs/min ∼51% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (35.3 - 37.7, n=2)
36.5 runs/min ∼49% +3%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
35.3 runs/min ∼47%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
125 Points ∼100% +119%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
106 Points ∼85% +86%
realme GT Master Edition (Chrome 92)
93 Points ∼74% +63%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=201, last 2 years)
83.6 Points ∼67% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
78 Points ∼62% +37%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
69 Points ∼55% +21%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
57 Points ∼46%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (49 - 57, n=3)
52.3 Points ∼42% -8%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme GT Master Edition (Chrome 92)
28221 Points ∼100% +60%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
26943 Points ∼95% +53%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
26577 Points ∼94% +51%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
26207 Points ∼93% +49%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=207, last 2 years)
19812 Points ∼70% +12%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
17734 Points ∼63% +1%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
17637 Points ∼62%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (14156 - 17637, n=3)
15560 Points ∼55% -12%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=209, last 2 years)
3578 ms * ∼100% -45%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (2475 - 4059, n=3)
3334 ms * ∼93% -35%
Samsung Galaxy A52 (Chrome 90)
2532.1 ms * ∼71% -2%
Motorola Edge 20 Lite (Chrome 94)
2475.3 ms * ∼69%
OnePlus Nord 2 5G (Chrome 92)
1808.9 ms * ∼51% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G (Chrome90)
1802.32 ms * ∼50% +27%
Xiaomi Poco F3 (Chrome 90)
1743.8 ms * ∼49% +30%
realme GT Master Edition (Chrome 92)
1404.9 ms * ∼39% +43%

* ... smaller is better

Motorola Edge 20 LiteXiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A52Xiaomi Poco F3OnePlus Nord 2 5Grealme GT Master EditionAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
31%
-29%
35%
90%
44%
-20%
-10%
Sequential Read 256KB
954.33
949.43
-1%
511.13
-46%
1378.12
44%
1827
91%
1001.7
5%
770 ?(427 - 1011, n=93)
-19%
846 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
478.27
710.31
49%
267.14
-44%
684.13
43%
1256.4
163%
798.2
67%
273 ?(13.6 - 707, n=93)
-43%
390 ?(11.9 - 1465, n=273, last 2 years)
-18%
Random Read 4KB
141.39
207.95
47%
135.54
-4%
208.02
47%
223.7
58%
213.1
51%
148 ?(92.6 - 239, n=93)
5%
149 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
5%
Random Write 4KB
161.85
206.89
28%
127.27
-21%
170.57
5%
239
48%
247.7
53%
125 ?(18.2 - 290, n=93)
-23%
140 ?(5.5 - 449, n=273, last 2 years)
-14%

Games - Motorola phone with gaming weaknesses

We take a closer look at the gaming performance of the Edge 20 Lite with our partner GameBench using game titles from the Play Store. The shooter PUBG mobile, where the HD setting is the