Notebookcheck Logo

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra review: The first smartphone with a 200 MP camera

High-end again at last. Motorola has unleashed a potential bargain in the high-end segment in the Edge 30 Ultra: a 200 MP triple camera, fast SoC, strong battery, good update supply, and all that for less than US$ 900. What could possibly go wrong?

Motorola has not released a high-end smartphone in a long time. Then again, the former industry giant had a strong budget flagship in its lineup last year, in the form of the Edge 20 Pro, which was succeeded by the Edge 30 Pro this year. 

With its Ultra model, Motorola is going a step further, elevating this series into the high-end category through the use of a better display and more powerful cameras. Above all, the focus is on the new 200 MPix sensor of the main camera.

For around US$ 900, the smartphone is still considerably cheaper than most of its competitors. Whether there are flaws or this is simply a case of a strong price-performance ratio is revealed in the following review.

Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Edge Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 393 PPI, capacitive, pOLED, 3D-curved, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 237 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity, digital Compass, Accelerometer, Orientation, Rotation, G-Sensor, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.39 x 161.76 x 73.5 ( = 0.33 x 6.37 x 2.89 in)
Battery
4610 mAh Lithium-Ion, 125W-TurboPower-Charging, 50W Wireless Charging, 10W Wireless PowerShare
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP1, 1/1.22", 0.64 µm, f/1.9, OIS) + 50 MPix (Samsung JN1, Ultra wide/Macro, 114°, 1/2.76", 0.64 µm, f/2.2) + 12 MPix (Sony IMX663, 2x Tele, 1/2.93", 1.22 µm, f/1.6); 8k-Video; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 60 MPix (OmniVision OV60A, Quad-Pixel, 0.61 µm, f/2.2); 4k-Video
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 125W-Charger, Clear-Case, USB-C-Cabel, Quick-Start-Guide, SIM-Tool, Display-Protection-Cover, My UX, ThinkShield for Mobile, 12 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0.89 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1.26 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1, E5a), BeiDou (B1, B2a, B1C); DRM Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
198.5 g ( = 7 oz / 0.44 pounds), Power Supply: 193 g ( = 6.81 oz / 0.43 pounds)
Price
900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.3 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
89.4 %
03/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
88.8 %
09/2022
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
225 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
87.7 %
08/2022
Sony Xperia 1 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
88.6 %
07/2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312
88.5 %
09/2022
Vivo X80 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"3200x1440

Case - Slim giant with matte glass on the back

With a 6.67-inch display, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra does not count among the smallest smartphone representatives, but is nevertheless very thin. This impression is further reinforced by its rounded longitudinal edges, and the smartphone feels comfortable in the hands. Moreover, the weight amounts to just under 200 grams. Even the Vivo X80 Pro weighs 16 grams more, and even the iPhone 14 Pro Max is a whopping 41 grams heavier. 

The workmanship is impressive. Corning Gorilla Glass 5 is installed for protection on the front side, while an unspecified kind of matte glass is used on the backside, which proves to be completely fingerprint proof. The slim aluminum edges give the impression of stability, and the gaps between the glass and aluminum are tight and flush. The Edge 30 Ultra defies torsional stress with ease. 

The SIM slot at the bottom connects almost seamlessly with the frame and sits a fraction more deeply. The Motorola smartphone is IP52 certified, meaning that it is protected against the ingress of harmful amounts of dust and splashes of water. But it is neither dust- nor waterproof. The Edge 30 Ultra is available in the color variants Interstellar Black and Starlight White.

Size Comparison

164.57 mm / 6.48 inch 75.3 mm / 2.96 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 215 g0.474 lbs165 mm / 6.5 inch 71 mm / 2.8 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs163.6 mm / 6.44 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 9.15 mm / 0.3602 inch 215 g0.474 lbs163.2 mm / 6.43 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 225 g0.496 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 77.9 mm / 3.07 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 228 g0.503 lbs161.76 mm / 6.37 inch 73.5 mm / 2.89 inch 8.39 mm / 0.3303 inch 198.5 g0.4376 lbs

Equipment - USB 3.2 in the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra possesses a USB 3.2 port (Gen. 1), which allows for high data rates of up to 5 GBit/s as well as wired image transfer. Thanks to OTG, external storage media and peripheral devices can be connected to the smartphone, or it can serve as a PowerBank for other devices. 

A microSD slot is not available, nor is an audio jack, a radio receiver or an IR blaster. In Germany, only a storage configuration with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB internal storage is available, which is rounded off with Bluetooth 5.2 and NFC. 

Top side: microphone
Top side: microphone
Left side
Left side
Right side: volume rocker, power
Right side: volume rocker, power
Bottom side: speaker, microphone, USB, SIM
Bottom side: speaker, microphone, USB, SIM

Software - Edge 30 Ultra with Android 12 and three updates

The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra comes with Android 12 and My UX. The user interface does not feature any major design changes, but it does offer a few software enhancements, such as the two-finger tapping motion to activate the flashlight, quick screenshots with three fingers, or the Gametools app. 

Motorola promises three large Android updates and four years of security patches for the Edge 30 Ultra. At the time of review, the security patch installed on our smartphone was from September 1, 2022, and thus up to date.

Communication and GNSS - 5G Sub6 and fast WLAN in the Moto smartphone

Thanks to broad frequency support, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra accesses mobile internet very easily and masters all current standards, with the exception of 5G mmWave. 

The smartphone also performs flawlessly in WLAN and even supports Wi-Fi 6E. Data transfer rates via our Asus ROG Rapture GE-ATX11000 reference router are high and mostly stable. The fluctuations in the 6 Ghz network will hardly be noticeable in everyday use. 

Networking
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
948 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼59%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1226 (min: 590) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1590 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1748 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1459 (min: 723) MBit/s ∼86%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼94%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1383 (min: 1126) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1328 (min: 378) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
610 (min: 44.3) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
657 (min: 57.7) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1440 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1309 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼77%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1657 (1379-1781)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1520 (1278-1606)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø865 (446-922)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (531-913)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)
GPS test: indoors
indoors
GPS test: outdoors
outdoors
GPS test: GNSS supported
GNSS

For localization, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra uses all current satellite networks with up to three frequency bands. Positioning indoors also functions very quickly and precisely. 

On a small bike ride, we compared the smartphone's tracking capabilities with those of the Garmin Venu 2. The recorded total distance deviates around 90 meters and the detailed route is convincing.

GNSS test ride: around the lake
GNSS test ride: around the lake
GNSS test ride: loop
GNSS test ride: loop
GNSS test ride: summary
GNSS test ride: summary

Telephony and Voice Quality

The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has three microphones at its disposal and, when held to the ear in quite environments, delivers crystal clear voice quality. Background chatter is reliably filtered out, but small distortions can occasionally occur in the speaker's voice. These distortions become worse in the presence of loud background noise, and the actual cause is not audible. Loudspeaker mode functions very well as long as the distance to the smartphone is not so large. At around two meters from the smartphone, the speaker can only be heard very quietly. 

The Edge 30 Ultra supports VoLTE and WLAN calls. Up to two Nano SIM cards can be inserted, but eSIM support is lacking. 

Cameras - Full-fledged triple camera with 200 MPix

Selfie with the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Selfie with the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra comes out fighting with large numbers of megapixels, with all cameras together amounting to a total of 322 MPix. The front-facing camera alone accounts for 60 MPix. Selfies taken with this camera are reduced to 15.1 MPix, but require over 7 MB of storage space. Even in low light, the quality is impressive and the preset beauty mode works very discreetly. Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD at 30 FPS.

The focus is on the 200 MPix sensor of the main camera of Samsung's Edge 30 Ultra, which combines 16 individual pixels into a super pixel with a size of 2.56 µm. Image files with a size of 12.6 MPix are then output. If you want to take photos in full size, you have to do without most of the image enhancement algorithms and be patient for around 2.5 seconds until the picture has been processed. The result then takes up around 32 MB of memory. The Moto smartphone also has a Pro mode that allows RAW photos, but these are again limited to 12.6 MPix (approx. 26 MB).

Photo quality is acceptable, even if the images are slightly blurry towards the edges. The white balance is also a little cool. Details are finely reproduced without going overboard with the sharpening. However, a little more dynamic would have been desirable.

All the more pleasing is that the two additional lenses are not just decorative accessories. The ultra-wide-angle lens also serves as a macro lens and provides a good depth of field thanks to its high resolution. Pixel binning is also used here, so only 12.6 MPix remains from the original 50 MPix. The third lens is a double optical magnifier, which is unfortunately no longer mandatory in this price range, but does without its own OIS. Up to 16x magnification is provided for the digital zoom.

In terms of video, the Motorola smartphone has a lot to offer and records in 8k at 30 FPS at best, but 60 FPS is also available for those who are content with Ultra HD. The aspect ratio can be 16:9 or full screen, which is an unusual video format at 20:9. Those wanting to record videos in HDR10+ will be limited to 4k/30 FPS. Slow motion is possible in Full HD at up to 960 FPS. The given quality is good, but we would have liked more flexibility when filming. 24 FPS should be possible at least, not to mention PAL formats or 21:9. 

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light
click to load images

We examined the main camera of Motorola's Edge 30 Ultra under controlled lighting conditions. The test chart is characterized by a very high level of detail in the center of the image. Even the smallest fonts remain legible, although small aberrations creep in here and there. Sharpness decreases towards the edges, but not to an excessive degree.

The white balance is very good here, but a few colors, dark brown and dark green, show high deviations from the target. 

ColorChecker
16.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Ultra: 7.88 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 18.07 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.5 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
51 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
48.3 ∆E
51.4 ∆E
28 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
40.7 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
47 ∆E
42.9 ∆E
34 ∆E
23 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Ultra: 35.39 ∆E min: 12.89 - max: 51.38 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty - Warranty period is extendable

The large packaging of Motorola's Edge 30 Ultra hints that it contains somewhat more than just a smartphone. A 125-watt charger, a USB-C cable, a SIM tool, a transparent silicone protective case, a multilingual quick start guide and another booklet with warranty conditions and safety instructions are included. A positive aspect is that no plastic is used for the packaging.

In Germany, the warranty amounts to 24 months. This can be extended by one year (+60 Euros) and the smartphone can optionally be insured against accidents for up to two years (up to 135 Euros). This covers both a broken display and water damage, and a maximum of two claims can be submitted without additional costs.

For international readers: Warranty terms and insurance options may differ from country to country, so be sure to check with your supplier before buying.

Input Devices & Operation - Optical fingerprint in Edge 30 Ultra

The capacitive touchscreen comes with a screen protector, which has been neatly applied but does not cover the entire front glass. Gliding quality is good, but not as convincing as on the glass surface. Nevertheless, the touchscreen responds very quickly and precisely to input, which is certainly due to the quite high sampling rate of 360 Hz.

Biometric security is provided by an optical fingerprint scanner in the display, which very reliably recognizes the stored fingerprints and unlocks quickly. Alternatively or additionally, facial recognition via the front-facing camera can be used, but is less secure.

The Edge 30 Ultra offers a variety of gestures and a one-hand mode, which works just like the iPhone.

Display - Bright OLED with up to 144 Hz

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The large 6.67-inch (16.94 cm) POLED display of Motorola's Edge 30 Ultra works with Full HD+ and a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz. However, the latter is only active when it is enabled permanently in the settings. If automatic mode is selected, the system varies the refresh rate between 60, 90 and 120 Hz.

The brightness of the panel is very good with a pure white display of over 1,000 cd/m². With an even distribution of bright and dark areas (APL18), the center of the screen achieves a value of up to 1,322 cd/m². This also ensures a vibrant display of HDR content. In this regard, the Edge 30 Ultra supports the HLG, HDR10 and HDR10+ standards. Up to 501 cd/m² is available in manual control.

The smartphone's POLED shows the typical flickering. At minimum brightness, this fluctuates quite unsteadily between 180 and 720 Hz. Sensitive users can use the DC dimming mode, which works with a stable 90 Hz at low panel brightness. Above 69% of the display brightness, only a frequency equal to the refresh rate can be measured. No temporal dithering was detected. For this, we examined the display with a microscope and a 240 FPS slow motion video (dark gray, at full brightness).

1004
cd/m²
1022
cd/m²
1037
cd/m²
1004
cd/m²
1020
cd/m²
1035
cd/m²
1001
cd/m²
1018
cd/m²
1039
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1039 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1020 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1020 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.80
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.73
Sony Xperia 1 IV
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.50
Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.81
Vivo X80 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.78
Screen
10%
-7%
6%
-50%
11%
Brightness middle
1020
1077
6%
831
-19%
890
-13%
956
-6%
938
-8%
Brightness
1020
1093
7%
807
-21%
897
-12%
959
-6%
947
-7%
Brightness Distribution
96
97
1%
91
-5%
97
1%
94
-2%
97
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
1.03
-3%
0.9
10%
2.4
-140%
0.9
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
2
29%
3.06
-9%
2.4
14%
5.2
-86%
1.9
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.1
1.3
38%
1.8
14%
1.4
33%
3.3
-57%
1.3
38%
Gamma
2.29 96%
2.37 93%
2.233 99%
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
CCT
6502 100%
6526 100%
6396 102%
6320 103%
6804 96%
6518 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 720 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 720 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 720 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19601 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Minimum display brightness
min.
25% display brightness
25%
50% display brightness
50%
75% display brightness
75%
Maximum display brightness
100%

Series of measurements at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

The most natural color representation is achieved on the display of the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra when the Natural color profile is selected. This is characterized by soft saturation and accurate colors. Only the white balance is not optimal and shows a subtle greenish tint, which is not annoying in everyday use. 

Grayscale (color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (Color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (Color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (Color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (Color profile: Natural, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4105 ms rise
↘ 0.3895 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.95 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.472 ms rise
↘ 0.4795 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

Motorola's Edge 30 Ultra makes a very good impression outdoors. Thanks to its large brightness reserves, it is easy to read, even on bright days, especially since the ambient light sensor reacts quickly to strong sunlight. 

In the fall sun
In the fall sun
In the shade
In the shade

We really like the viewing angle stability of Motorola's smartphone. There are no color distortions in any position. Even at very flat viewing angles, the brightness decreases only slightly and the display is cooler. 

Viewing angle stability of the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Viewing angle stability of the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra

Performance - Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Moto smartphone

The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is supported by 12 GB of LPDDR5 RAM. The SoC is on the expected level in the benchmarks.

In the AnTuTu, the Moto smartphone achieves a seven-digit score and takes the lead in the comparison field. It also lands in top position in PCMark and Basemark OS II and is beaten only by the Xiaomi 12S Ultra in CrossMark in terms of system performance.

However, the AI benchmarks are surprisingly weak; we expected better results in AImark and Procyon. 

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1325 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (930 - 1356, n=14)
1292 Points ∼97% -3%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1237 Points ∼93% -7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1234 Points ∼93% -7%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=264, last 2 years)
736 Points ∼55% -45%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4399 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points ∼97%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3987 - 4436, n=14)
4218 Points ∼96% -1%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3685 Points ∼84% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points ∼81% -16%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3489 Points ∼79% -18%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points ∼77% -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=264, last 2 years)
2370 Points ∼54% -44%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057309 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (846323 - 1119358, n=12)
1021933 Points ∼95% -5%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
944782 Points ∼88% -12%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points ∼88% -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
692924 Points ∼65% -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=158, last 2 years)
579836 Points ∼54% -46%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
17340 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=12)
15080 Points ∼87% -13%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
14283 Points ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14267 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13983 Points ∼81% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
12579 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=212, last 2 years)
10339 Points ∼60% -40%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10140 Points ∼58% -42%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1165 Points ∼100% +6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points ∼95%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (806 - 1178, n=12)
1052 Points ∼90% -5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
990 Points ∼85% -10%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points ∼81% -15%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
879 Points ∼75% -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=95, last 2 years)
770 Points ∼66% -30%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8164 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (6423 - 8753, n=12)
7797 Points ∼96% -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7567 Points ∼93% -7%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7277 Points ∼89% -11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7085 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7068 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6319 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 8753, n=178, last 2 years)
4612 Points ∼56% -44%
System
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13412 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (10047 - 13563, n=12)
12200 Points ∼91% -9%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
11338 Points ∼85% -15%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
10990 Points ∼82% -18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10464 Points ∼78% -22%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10047 Points ∼75% -25%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
9765 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=178, last 2 years)
8151 Points ∼61% -39%
Memory
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8777 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (6124 - 9017, n=12)
7824 Points ∼89% -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
7806 Points ∼89% -11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7492 Points ∼85% -15%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7293 Points ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6352 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6212 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=178, last 2 years)
5192 Points ∼59% -41%
Graphics
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21947 Points ∼100% +14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
21737 Points ∼99% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=12)
21620 Points ∼99% +12%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20288 Points ∼92% +5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
20093 Points ∼92% +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19247 Points ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17104 Points ∼78% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=178, last 2 years)
8874 Points ∼40% -54%
Web
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1960 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1559 - 2006, n=12)
1830 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1783 Points ∼91% -9%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1758 Points ∼90% -10%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1728 Points ∼88% -12%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1698 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1434 Points ∼73% -27%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=178, last 2 years)
1406 Points ∼72% -28%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81854 Points ∼100% +462%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
81722 Points ∼100% +461%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
80599 Points ∼98% +453%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
74725 Points ∼91% +413%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=12)
61653 Points ∼75% +323%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=97, last 2 years)
23194 Points ∼28% +59%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
14572 Points ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10841 Points ∼13% -26%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=155, last 2 years)
52108 Points ∼100% +764%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7448 Points ∼14% +23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6602 Points ∼13% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1043 - 7865, n=11)
6385 Points ∼12% +6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6355 Points ∼12% +5%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6273 Points ∼12% +4%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points ∼12% +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6034 Points ∼12%

The Adreno 730 of the Edge 30 Ultra impresses with very high performance and is on par with the Xiaomi 12S Ultra in the benchmarks. But later on, Motorola overtakes the Xiaomi in the onscreen tests, since the latter with its QHD-Plus resolution has more pixels to process. 

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2899 Points ∼100% +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points ∼95%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points ∼89% -7%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2456 Points ∼85% -11%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2038 Points ∼70% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points ∼66% -31%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2873 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points ∼97%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points ∼92% -6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points ∼89% -8%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2073 Points ∼72% -26%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points ∼71% -27%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11073 Points ∼100% +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points ∼99%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points ∼93% -6%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10151 Points ∼92% -8%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7932 Points ∼72% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points ∼66% -34%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps ∼100%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼83% -17%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼83% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps ∼82% -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼63% -37%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼42% -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
445 fps ∼98% -2%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps ∼96% -4%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps ∼66% -34%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 fps ∼59% -41%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps ∼100%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps ∼80% -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps ∼75% -25%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps ∼75% -25%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps ∼58% -42%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼42% -58%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
247 fps ∼100% +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps ∼96%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps ∼76% -21%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps ∼74% -23%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps ∼68% -30%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
147 fps ∼60% -38%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼100%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼85% -15%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps ∼85% -15%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼60% -40%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
189 fps ∼100% +6%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps ∼95%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps ∼80% -16%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps ∼67% -29%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼59% -37%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps ∼52% -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼89% -11%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼65% -35%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼55% -45%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼54% -46%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼44% -56%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps ∼95% -5%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps ∼94% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼66% -34%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps ∼64% -36%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps ∼49% -51%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼91% -9%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps ∼76% -24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼75% -25%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps ∼46% -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps ∼100%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼85% -15%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps ∼65% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼56% -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps ∼94% -6%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼64% -36%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼58% -42%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼55% -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼40% -60%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps ∼97% -3%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps ∼95% -5%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps ∼73% -27%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps ∼61% -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼57% -43%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps ∼100%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps ∼91% -9%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps ∼65% -35%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps ∼61% -39%

Basemark GPUScore