Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review: Dream display for anti-5G users at a bargain price

Mid-range game changer. A 120 Hz OLED panel in a mid-range phone with a powerful Snapdragon SoC and a 108 MP camera for less than 280 Euros (~$336)? Not too long ago, these were features of a premium smartphone. Our review of the Xiaomi smartphone reveals how the affordable Redmi Note 10 Pro fares apart from the 6.67-inch AMOLED Dot display.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Just last year, Xiaomi defined the display standard for the mid-range in terms of 60 Hz panels with the AMOLED panels in the Mi 10 Lite and Mi Note 10 Lite. This year, the Chinese manufacturer raises the bar even higher with the Redmi Note 10 Pro, because the panel of the affordable mid-range phone now relies on a high refresh rate of 120 Hz.

Besides the organic display, the Note 10 Pro also offers additional equipment highlights, such as the 108-megapixel main camera and 33-watt fast charging. A Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G runs internally, which is supported by 6 GB or 8 GB of RAM as well as up to 128 GB of flash storage. The following variants are available:

I. 64 GB storage/6 GB RAM: 280 Euros (~$336) MSRP).

II. 128 GB storage/6 GB RAM: 300 Euros (~$359) (MSRP)

III. 128 GB storage/8 GB RAM: 330 Euros (~$395) (MSRP)

Users who can do without the 120 Hz can consider the smaller brother, the Note 10, a possible alternative within the Redmi series; it was introduced together with the Pro model.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, AMOLED Dot display, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (dedicated, up to 512 GB, exFAT support), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 4G: LTE FDD B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32, B38/40/41(2535–2655 MHz); 3G: WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8; 2G: GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 164 x 76.5 ( = 0.32 x 6.46 x 3.01 in)
Battery
5020 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (0.7 μm pixel, 1/1.52", f/1.9); 8 MP (118°, f/2.2); 5 MP (f/2.4); 2 MP (f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: on-screen, Case, charger, USB cable, MIUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.597 W/​kg head, 0.994 W/​kg body, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
193 g ( = 6.81 oz / 0.43 pounds), Power Supply: 93 g ( = 3.28 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.5 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82.1 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
80.1 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81.3 %
12/2020
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.49"2400x1080
81.3 %
02/2021
Motorola Moto G 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
212 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
81.8 %
10/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case - Xiaomi phone with punch hole

Redmi Note 10 Pro in Gradient Bronze
Redmi Note 10 Pro in Gradient Bronze
Redmi Note 10 Pro in Glacier Blue
Redmi Note 10 Pro in Glacier Blue

The front of the Note 10 Pro is made of a scratch-resistant Gorilla Glass 5 display glass that is flush with the plastic frame. The ratio between the display and the front of the device is a good 86% thanks to the comparatively small punch hole and the relatively narrow screen bezels. The only thing that looks a bit protruding is the "chin".

The transition between the bezel and the glass could have been a bit "rounder" for our taste, but the design is still a bit angular. There are no compromises in terms of feel thanks to the glass back. Besides our test sample in Onyx Gray, Gradient Bronze and Glacier Blue are available as color options.

Stability and workmanship are at a very appealing level. The built-in buttons in particular sit pleasantly firmly in the frame, and even the power button with the integrated fingerprint sensor, which is often a bit wobbly in smartphones, has almost no amount of play in the Note 10 Pro. Furthermore, the case of the Redmi phone has an official IP certification, albeit only according to IP53. The water-repellent coating protects the Note 10 Pro from rain and sweat on the inside and outside.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

166.1 mm / 6.54 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 9.9 mm / 0.3898 inch 212 g0.4674 lbs165.3 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9.4 mm / 0.3701 inch 215 g0.474 lbs165.38 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 215 g0.474 lbs164.2 mm / 6.46 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 205 g0.4519 lbs164 mm / 6.46 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.95 mm / 0.3524 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs162 mm / 6.38 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs

Connectivity - Redmi Note 10 Pro with 3.5 mm audio jack

The Xiaomi smartphone's equipment list includes a triple card slot, so that the dual-SIM function can be used independently of the dedicated SD card slot, a 3.5 mm audio jack as well as Miracast, and an IR blaster. An always-on display mode is also selectable, but at the time of testing, and as with the Xiaomi Mi 11, it's limited to a few seconds, which makes it more akin to the familiar display-preview feature of Motorola phones.

The internal UFS storage has a capacity of 128 GB in our review sample, but 21 GB is already occupied by the system out of the box. The 5,020 mAh battery is charged via a USB-C 2.0 port on the case's bottom. USB OTG is also supported, allowing the Redmi phone to easily connect to memory sticks, for example.

Bottom case side (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Bottom case side (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Top case side (IR blaster, microphone, speaker, 3.5 mm audio jack)
Top case side (IR blaster, microphone, speaker, 3.5 mm audio jack)
Right case side (buttons)
Right case side (buttons)
Left case side (card slot)
Left case side (card slot)

microSD reader

We take a look at the speed of the Redmi Note 10 Pro's card slot with our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference memory card. While the results in the CPDT benchmark are appealing, the performance in our JPEG Copy test is less convincing at a good 13 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.32 MB/s ∼100% +279%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.29 MB/s ∼26%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075808523.88787.488.487.186.186.887.789.387.986.888.886.886.889.586.886.885.189.686.788.386.388.888.685.580.787.584.987.48887.788.388.184.282.988.189.487.287.987.988.28781.689.282.882.979.967.884.785.488.482.189.886.686.982.969.882.484.684.582.483.88786.687.186.283.183.876.982.288.486.982.182.384.981.482.477.677.280.68281.483.783.875.679.478.380.780.686.18481.983.777.883.281.98279.671.784.279.781.282.881.481.4848375.184.276.389.178.883.683.682.778.883.783.278.282.282.681.582.681.879.985.778.684.345.454.667.679.28078.975.179.579.879.480.280.161.470.269.174.97468.963.376.578.668.871.677.676.267.163.569.969.562.849.57865.879.774.667.972.871.575.371.272.677.97476.977.571.270.769.666.860.273.480.47479.478.770.376.47575.877.578.97979.67378.676.978.178.679.679.679.979.978.279.97775.978.17979.779.779.379.177.676.975.475.976.669.577.177.377.77878.779.576.379.777.478.17977.878.67673.378.579.279.378.375.678.67977.77552.368.670.176.873.478.278.37778.876.877.477.377.974.371.478.123.88787.488.487.186.186.887.789.387.986.888.886.886.889.586.886.885.189.686.788.386.388.888.685.580.787.584.987.48887.788.388.184.282.988.189.487.287.987.988.28781.689.282.882.979.967.884.785.488.482.189.886.686.982.969.882.484.684.582.483.88786.687.186.283.183.876.982.288.486.982.182.384.981.482.477.677.280.68281.483.783.875.679.478.380.780.686.18481.983.777.883.281.98279.671.784.279.781.282.881.481.4848375.184.276.389.178.883.683.682.778.883.783.278.282.282.681.582.681.879.985.778.684.345.454.667.679.28078.975.179.579.879.480.280.161.470.269.174.97468.963.376.578.668.871.677.676.267.163.569.969.562.849.57865.879.774.667.972.871.575.371.272.677.97476.977.571.270.769.666.860.273.480.47479.478.770.376.47575.877.578.97979.67378.676.978.178.679.679.679.979.978.279.97775.978.17979.779.779.379.177.676.975.475.976.669.577.177.377.77878.779.576.379.777.478.17977.878.67673.378.579.279.378.375.678.67977.77552.368.670.176.873.478.278.37778.876.877.477.377.974.371.478.140.242.343.638.148.44644.940.437.237.734.43638.835.741.739.13636.933.735.638.236.643.437.23539.737.537.534.341.435.438.837.134.234.740.83939.637.336.735.138.134.144.240.430.138.739.434.63732.936.537.835.138.234.43539.435.541.532.436.93838.23338.236.936.736.235.637.241.833.536.738.337.13940.537.338.935.933.935.135.535.934.73736.837.331.84038.834.734.239.44137.135.333.438.937.332.436.939.638.732.138.737.438.135.541.137.74033.635.535.729.834.837.737.636.926.838.537.129.734.439.538.750.748.850.248.652.449.551.742.639.737.642.341.338.143.236.238.937.439.636.839.841.84141.536.840.740.739.335.540.637.740.840.241.54140.139413641.441.138.54344.338.740.737.939.141.24139.236.443.144.241.239.238.235.542.842.235.341.541.242.340.842.53641.942.645.642.941.441.941.942.44237.942.739.838.242.441.539.840.839.238.436.239.136.740.944.534.942.342.134.738.64040.239.336.742.94140.539.439.744.241.9424540.34240.840.339.445.340.23840.641.137.44440.438.538.543.937.639.637.742.4Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø83.3 (23.8-89.8)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential read; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø74.7 (45.4-80.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø37.2 (26.8-48.4)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Sequential write; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40.8 (34.7-52.4)

Software - Xiaomi phone with MIUI 12

Google's Android version 11 with security patches from March 2021 is used as the operating system. The Chinese manufacturer has implemented its in-house user interface, MIUI 12.0.10, on top of it.

The MIUI 12 user interface is more reminiscent of Apple's iOS than of the underlying Android operating system due to the separate notification center, the app switcher, and the design of the control center, but it offers a lot of customization options and a well-optimized system interface. However, Xiaomi also preinstalls many third-party apps, but they can be uninstalled.

Video content from streaming services can be watched in HD quality with the Redmi Note 10 Pro, since the Widevine L1 certification process has been performed.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Communication and GNSS - Xiaomi smartphone without 5G

In terms of communication modules, Xiaomi relies on the a/b/g/n/ac WLAN standard, Bluetooth version 5.1, and an NFC chip, which enables contactless payments with the Redmi phone.

The budget mid-range phone offers solid and stable transfer rates within the home Wi-Fi network. In combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, the Note 10 Pro achieves average speeds of about 330 Mb/s for receiving data and 280 Mb/s for sending data, which is satisfactory for a smartphone in this price range but is clearly surpassed by the Poco X3 NFC or the OnePlus Nord N10 5G. Even the predecessor offered faster Wi-Fi speeds.

The X15 modem enables the Xiaomi smartphone to access mobile Internet at a maximum speed of 4G, so the faster 5G standard is not supported. The Note 10 Pro only supports access to a total of 13 LTE bands, but it covers all LTE frequencies relevant for Germany - including band 28.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (604min - 684max) MBit/s ∼100% +135%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (603min - 673max) MBit/s ∼100% +135%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s ∼95% +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼83% +95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼83% +95%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=286, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼71% +67%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s ∼52% +22%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s ∼51% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼100% +102%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (596min - 664max) MBit/s ∼97% +95%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s ∼95% +92%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (481min - 662max) MBit/s ∼94% +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s ∼93% +87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=286, last 2 years)
465 MBit/s ∼70% +40%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s ∼55% +11%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s ∼51% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s ∼50%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320158327333325334325321338330330330336334327332334316333329328338335324337329329336339335336158327333325334325321338330330330336334327332334316333329328338335324337329329336339335336148271297276292284269292282282286284276280281281288285273281284283283286276285283286283285Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (158-339)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (148-297)
Positioning indoors
Positioning indoors
Positioning outdoors
Positioning outdoors

The Redmi Note 10 Pro uses the main satellite systems GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), and Galileo (E1) to determine its position. This procedure takes place quickly and with an accuracy of three meters. Even indoors, positioning is quite fast but a bit less accurate at five meters.

In order to assess the positioning accuracy in practice, we take the Xiaomi smartphone on a short trip and track the route with a Garmin Edge 500 in parallel for comparison purposes. About 190 meters lie between the smartphone's GPS module and the navigation device at the end of the 6-kilometer test route. When looking at the detailed view of the GPS log, there are no major inaccuracies found in the Redmi phone's route.

Positioning of the Redmi Note 10 Pro in comparison with the Garmin Edge 500
Positioning of the Redmi Note 10 Pro in comparison with the Garmin Edge 500
Positioning of the Redmi Note 10 Pro in comparison with the Garmin Edge 500

Telephone and call quality - Redmi Note 10 Pro with dual SIM

There is nothing to complain about in terms of call quality with the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Voices are reproduced intelligibly and also characterized as being clear by our conversation partner. Skype video calls using the built-in front-facing camera and the speaker also worked smoothly in our test.

Thanks to Wi-Fi calling, the Xiaomi phone can be used to make calls over a Wi-Fi network when mobile reception is limited. Furthermore, calls can be made via LTE networks thanks to the VoLTE feature.

Cameras - Xiaomi phone with 108 MP camera

Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Portrait Mode
Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Portrait Mode
Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Photo Mode
Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Photo Mode

The main camera of the quad-cam setup is reportedly based on the 1/1.52-inch Samsung ISOCELL HM2 with a resolution of 108 MP - but the 9-in-1 binning technology stores photos with a resolution of 12 MP and a pixel size of 2.1 μm by default. In addition, there's an 8 MP ultra wide-angle lens, a 5 MP lens for macro shots, and a 2 MP depth sensor.

In practice, the wide-angle module delivers good results, especially in view of the MSRP of under 300 Euros (~$359). Photos taken with the 108 MP sensor score points with a good dynamic range and appealing sharpness. Even in low light, the pictures' brightness is appealing, but image sharpness decreases increasingly in the dark. Although there is no dedicated telephoto lens, zoom shots with a magnification of up to 5x still look quite decent.

The ultra wide-angle lens with a relatively wide field of view of 123° also provides very decent image quality. However, the photos taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro present artifacts and pronounced blurriness at the edges. Both the image details and dynamics as well as the color reproduction are able to convince, though. As is typical in this price range, the resolution of the ultra wide-angle lens is quite low at only 8 MP.

As a result, video recorded with the ultra wide-angle lens are limited to a maximum of Full HD quality. With the 108 MP sensor, videos can also be shot in UHD at 30 fps. However, those who want to use a higher frame rate will have to settle for 1080p at up to 60 fps. Moreover, it's not possible to switch between the two lenses while a video recording is in progress.

The front-facing camera, which has been placed in a central punch-hole cutout, has a resolution of 16 MP. The results are quite respectable for a budget mid-range phone. Selfies have a solid base sharpness, and the exposure and blur effect in Portrait Mode are usually consistent.

Ultra wide-angle camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
Ultra wide-angle camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
108 MP main camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
108 MP main camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
10x zoom (max)
108 MP mode
Ultra wide-angle camera
108 MP main camera
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleLow light5x zoom Ultra wide angle

Under controlled lighting conditions, we subject the rear 108 MP camera to further tests. We use the ColorChecker Passport to analyze color reproduction in comparison to the actual reference colors, once under full studio lighting and once at 1 lux light intensity.

Colors are hit really well with the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Blue tones are brightened, but the deviations don't reveal any real weaknesses for a 280-Euro (~$335) phone - for comparison, the differences to the reference colors are slightly higher in the Xiaomi Mi 11 with a Delta E value of 11.14.

The image sharpness in our test chart is not very pronounced, and slight color distortions are also visible.

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro: 7.54 ∆E min: 2.46 - max: 13.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro: 45.6 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 85.53 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Xiaomi phone with case

The Redmi Note 10 Pro includes a case in the box
The Redmi Note 10 Pro includes a case in the box
The power adapter of the Redmi Note 10 Pro
The power adapter of the Redmi Note 10 Pro

The Redmi Note 10 Pro comes with a 33-watt modular power adapter and a USB cable. A quality protective case is also included with the Xiaomi phone, and a protective film is also installed out of the box. The Chinese manufacturer hasn't listed any special accessories in its online store so far.

There's a 12-month warranty after the purchase date.

Input devices and handling - Redmi Note 10 Pro with 240 Hz

Not only does using the Note 10 Pro benefit from the high refresh rate of 120 Hz, but also from the sampling rate of 240 Hz. The capacitive multi-touchscreen is consequently monitored for taps up to 240 times per second (in games, among other things). The Xiaomi phone can also be operated correspondingly accurately.

The active fingerprint sensor, which is integrated into the on/off button, responds quickly and also recognizes fingers very precisely. It's position has been chosen comfortably. Those who want to use facial data to unlock the display can do so via the front-facing camera. However, biometric identification using a face is less secure due to the utilization of a 2D method.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Display - Redmi Note 10 Pro with a 120 Hz OLED

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
PWM in the Redmi Note 10 Pro at 55%
PWM in the Redmi Note 10 Pro at 55%

Xiaomi uses a 6.67-inch, HDR10-certified AMOLED panel with a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels and a refresh rate of 120 Hz in its mid-range phone. Furthermore, the Chinese manufacturer specifies a peak brightness of 1,200 nits for the Note 10 Pro. We can't quite completely reach these rates even in the APL50 test (991 cd/m²), but brightness is certainly not bad for HDR content - especially since the APL10 test definitely leaves some headroom. Even in our measurements with a white background, the AMOLED display manages a high luminance for this price range at 653 cd/m² with a very homogeneous brightness distribution.

It should be noted that the display is set to 60 Hz by default, and it has to be manually changed to a refresh rate of 120 Hz in the display settings. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro doesn't offer an adaptive refresh rate like in the Xiaomi Mi 11. Therefore, the display operates either with a refresh rate of 60 Hz or 120 Hz.

For brightness control, the Xiaomi smartphone uses pulse width modulation (PWM) at a quite high frequency of 263-490 Hz as soon as brightness is dimmed to below 55%. Above that, we measure a frequency of 120 Hz, but the fluctuations in amplitude are much lower here. We didn't find a DC-dimming mode in the settings menus.

648
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
660
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 660 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 650.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 653 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.49
Motorola Moto G 5G
LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-60%
-134%
-76%
-57%
-31%
-36%
-19%
Brightness middle
653
606
-7%
543
-17%
527
-19%
450
-31%
586
-10%
623
-5%
610
-7%
Brightness
651
574
-12%
512
-21%
499
-23%
422
-35%
565
-13%
600
-8%
579
-11%
Brightness Distribution
98
89
-9%
85
-13%
87
-11%
89
-9%
88
-10%
93
-5%
92
-6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.63
0.38
0.57
0.61
0.54
0.37
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
2.4
-100%
4.9
-308%
3.5
-192%
2.67
-123%
1.74
-45%
1.8
-50%
1.8
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
5.3
-83%
8.6
-197%
7.3
-152%
6.76
-133%
4.09
-41%
4.7
-62%
3
-3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
4.5
-150%
6.3
-250%
2.9
-61%
2
-11%
3
-67%
3.3
-83%
2.5
-39%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.274 97%
2.244 98%
2.26 97%
2.31 95%
CCT
6426 101%
6224 104%
8120 80%
6502 100%
6859 95%
6000 108%
6712 97%
6864 95%
Contrast
1377
862
1387
789
961
1154
1649

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 490.2 Hz ≤ 54 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 490.2 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 54 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 490.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21103 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

As in every OLED panel, the AMOLED Dot display in the Note 10 Pro completely turns off individual pixels, which results in an "absolute" black, and contrast theoretically tends towards infinity. In our tests with the CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the Xiaomi smartphone's display proves to be very well calibrated, and it delivers very low color deviations in the Standard profile.

In addition to "Standard", which covers most of the sRGB color space, the display settings also include the "Saturated" profile and the automatic profile; the latter is set by default and offers an almost full reproduction of the DCI-P3 color space. However, the Delta E color deviations are higher here.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Color space (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Color space (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Saturation (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Saturation (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

The Redmi Note 10 Pro leaves a good impression outdoors. Thanks to pronounced contrasts and a relatively high brightness, outdoor readability is possible even in direct sunlight. It should be noted that the maximum luminance without the brightness sensor is only 419 cd/m².

As is typical for OLEDs, the viewing angles of the Redmi phone are also very good. A decrease in brightness is hardly noticeable when the panel is tilted slightly, and colors are relatively stable at very flat viewing angles.

Viewing angles in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
Viewing angles in the Redmi Note 10 Pro

Performance - Xiaomi smartphone with Snapdragon SoC

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G is an SoC manufactured in an 8 nm process with a total of eight cores that are divided into two clusters. While the performance cluster contains two fast Cortex-A76 cores that clock at up to 2.3 GHz in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, the power-saving cluster contains six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz). The Big.LITTLE concept allows both clusters to run simultaneously.

The "G" in the name indicates that the SoC is optimized for gaming performance. According to Qualcomm, some Wi-Fi features have been adjusted for this purpose as well as the graphics card accelerated. The latter is a Qualcomm Adreno 618.

In our benchmark package, the Xiaomi phone delivers decent performance. The Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro is on par with the Poco X3 NFC, and the Snapdragon 750G in the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G is also partly outperformed. However, the UFS storage's rates in the AndroBench benchmarks are strikingly weak. The 2.2 standard performs more at the level of the relatively slow UFS 2.1 storage here. The AIMark results are also very low compared to the Poco Phone.

System speed is satisfactory in everyday use, and it ensures smooth operation in combination with the 6 GB of RAM and the 120 Hz refresh rate. However, small micro stutters can be noticed from time to time in the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Whether this is due to the somewhat too low performance of the Adreno 618, or if it might eventually be fixed by optimization processes in the MIUI interface is something that remains to be seen. Nevertheless, the Xiaomi phone has slight performance problems and stutters more strongly as soon as the system is put under heavy load, such as when a number of apps are installed in the background.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼100% +17%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points ∼72% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points ∼78% -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
610 Points ∼93% +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
657 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points ∼86% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (563 - 567, n=3)
565 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=257, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼93% +8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points ∼84%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼97% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points ∼73% -13%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points ∼79% -5%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1873 Points ∼91% +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1987 Points ∼96% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points ∼87% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1728 - 1792, n=3)
1769 Points ∼86% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=257, last 2 years)
2063 Points ∼100% +19%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1182 Points ∼52%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1081 Points ∼47% -9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1418 Points ∼62% +20%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
905 Points ∼40% -23%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1143 Points ∼50% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points ∼48% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1030 - 1182, n=3)
1101 Points ∼48% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=157, last 2 years)
2289 Points ∼100% +94%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1293 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1227 Points ∼53% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1525 Points ∼66% +18%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points ∼66% +19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
981 Points ∼42% -24%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1245 Points ∼54% -4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points ∼56% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1211 - 1293, n=3)
1265 Points ∼54% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=158, last 2 years)
2325 Points ∼100% +80%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8543 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼83% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
7158 Points ∼67% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points ∼100% +25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
10321 Points ∼97% +21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9794 Points ∼92% +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points ∼82% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8543 - 8773, n=2)
8658 Points ∼81% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=182, last 2 years)
10125 Points ∼95% +19%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8688 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼87% -13%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points ∼71% -29%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8021 Points ∼92% -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8076 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8064 - 8688, n=3)
8284 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=228, last 2 years)
8099 Points ∼93% -7%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼97%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23548 Points ∼57%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
35182 Points ∼86%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39807 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
40955 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=161, last 2 years)
41133 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼95%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
29682 Points ∼50%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
44899 Points ∼76%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
54788 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
56640 Points ∼96%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=161, last 2 years)
59148 Points ∼100%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼85%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13664 Points ∼58%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
19976 Points ∼85%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20351 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points ∼88%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
20797 Points ∼88%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=161, last 2 years)
23546 Points ∼100%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4021 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼70% -30%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3499 Points ∼87% -13%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3208 Points ∼80% -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3998 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3784 - 4021, n=3)
3908 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=230, last 2 years)
3491 Points ∼87% -13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4232 Points ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼96% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3805 Points ∼90% -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3197 Points ∼76% -24%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4097 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3917 - 4232, n=3)
4087 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=230, last 2 years)
4070 Points ∼96% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3375 Points ∼92%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2730 Points ∼75% -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points ∼83% -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3257 Points ∼89% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3657 Points ∼100% +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points ∼92% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3382, n=3)
3374 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=230, last 2 years)
2822 Points ∼77% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3887 Points ∼89%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼95% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points ∼85% -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points ∼78% -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3327 Points ∼77% -14%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4098 Points ∼94% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points ∼90% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3887 - 3939, n=3)
3915 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=257, last 2 years)
4344 Points ∼100% +12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4038 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼76% +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points ∼71% -2%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points ∼62% -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3307 Points ∼59% -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4211 Points ∼75% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼73% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4038 - 4256, n=3)
4127 Points ∼74% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=257, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼100% +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼92% +8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points ∼76% -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points ∼76% -11%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3984 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points ∼86% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3125 - 3425, n=3)
3307 Points ∼83% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (640 - 5784, n=255, last 2 years)
3056 Points ∼77% -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2783 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points ∼92% -7%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points ∼90% -9%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2198 Points ∼79% -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2798 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2713 - 2783, n=3)
2752 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=227, last 2 years)
2688 Points ∼96% -3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2694 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼92% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points ∼89% -6%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points ∼85% -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1982 Points ∼70% -26%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2549 Points ∼90% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points ∼90% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2559 - 2694, n=3)
2625 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=227, last 2 years)
2845 Points ∼100% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points ∼95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼99% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points ∼78% -18%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points ∼84% -11%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3265 Points ∼92% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3566 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points ∼96% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3372 - 3436, n=3)
3398 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=227, last 2 years)
2842 Points ∼80% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2938 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼83% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points ∼74% -9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points ∼74% -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2348 Points ∼66% -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2956 Points ∼83% +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points ∼80% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2865 - 2938, n=3)
2913 Points ∼82% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=259, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼100% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2832 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼68% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points ∼62% -8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points ∼61% -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2187 Points ∼52% -23%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2762 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points ∼65% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2735 - 2832, n=3)
2797 Points ∼67% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=259, last 2 years)
4176 Points ∼100% +47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3311 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points ∼79% -12%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points ∼83% -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3374 Points ∼92% +2%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3659 Points ∼100% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points ∼94% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3311 - 3438, n=3)
3383 Points ∼92% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (626 - 5793, n=259, last 2 years)
3090 Points ∼84% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2610 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2581 Points ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2501 Points ∼95% -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points ∼91% -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2081 Points ∼79% -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2601 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2506 - 2610, n=3)
2570 Points ∼97% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=194, last 2 years)
2643 Points ∼100% +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2562 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2510 Points ∼85% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2461 Points ∼83% -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points ∼79% -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1932 Points ∼65% -25%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2479 Points ∼83% -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points ∼82% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2427 - 2562, n=3)
2508 Points ∼84% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=194, last 2 years)
2970 Points ∼100% +16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2773 Points ∼96%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2864 Points ∼100% +3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2651 Points ∼92% -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points ∼91% -5%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2769 Points ∼96% 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2876 Points ∼100% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points ∼98% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2773 - 2828, n=3)
2809 Points ∼98% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=194, last 2 years)
2642 Points ∼92% -5%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1143 Points ∼31%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼30% -4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points ∼34% +9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points ∼34% +8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
821 Points ∼22% -28%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3658 Points ∼100% +220%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
835 Points ∼23% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (835 - 1143, n=3)
1031 Points ∼28% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=124, last 2 years)
3065 Points ∼84% +168%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1124 Points ∼35%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1094 Points ∼34% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points ∼38% +8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points ∼38% +7%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
809 Points ∼25% -28%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1098 Points ∼35% -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
720 Points ∼23% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (720 - 1124, n=3)
985 Points ∼31% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=121, last 2 years)
3181 Points ∼100% +183%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
81 fps ∼100%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
50 fps ∼62% -38%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
60 fps ∼74% -26%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps ∼68% -32%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
58 fps ∼72% -28%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
60 fps ∼74% -26%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps ∼74% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (60 - 81, n=3)
74 fps ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=202, last 2 years)
63.4 fps ∼78% -22%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼76%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
90 fps ∼75% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
68 fps ∼57% -25%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps ∼56% -26%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
73 fps ∼61% -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
90 fps ∼75% -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps ∼76% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (91 - 91, n=3)
91 fps ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=202, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼100% +32%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40 fps ∼74%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40 fps ∼74% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
54 fps ∼100% +35%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼69% -7%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
33 fps ∼61% -17%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
40 fps ∼74% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼63% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (34 - 43, n=3)
39 fps ∼72% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=201, last 2 years)
50.7 fps ∼94% +27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼64%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
45 fps ∼64% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
41 fps ∼59% -9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps ∼53% -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
37 fps ∼53% -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
45 fps ∼64% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (45 - 45, n=3)
45 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=202, last 2 years)
69.9 fps ∼100% +55%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼57% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
51 fps ∼100% +76%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps ∼47% -17%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
23 fps ∼45% -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps ∼57% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps ∼55% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (28 - 32, n=3)
29.7 fps ∼58% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=200, last 2 years)
39.5 fps ∼77% +36%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
26 fps ∼54% -21%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps ∼56% -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼54% -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (33 - 33, n=3)
33 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=200, last 2 years)
48 fps ∼100% +45%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼69%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼65% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
23 fps ∼93% +35%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps ∼52% -24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼52% -24%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps ∼65% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps ∼69% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (17 - 18, n=3)
17.3 fps ∼70% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=199, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼100% +46%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13 fps ∼45% -32%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼52% -21%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼48% -26%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps ∼62% -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (19 - 19, n=3)
19 fps ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=199, last 2 years)
28.9 fps ∼100% +52%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼60%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps ∼100% +67%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps ∼50% -17%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼47% -22%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps ∼57% -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps ∼60% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.3 fps ∼61% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25 fps ∼83% +39%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
21 fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼68% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼58% -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps ∼58% -19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼51% -29%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps ∼65% -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps ∼68% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (20 - 21, n=3)
20.3 fps ∼69% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼100% +40%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps ∼100% +55%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps ∼54% -16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8.7 fps ∼51% -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11 fps ∼65% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps ∼65% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (11 - 12, n=3)
11.3 fps ∼66% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
16.8 fps ∼99% +53%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.4 fps ∼65%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼65% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps ∼54% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps ∼54% -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼51% -22%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.5 fps ∼66% +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps ∼66% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (7.4 - 7.5, n=3)
7.43 fps ∼65% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.4 fps ∼100% +54%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
292450 Points ∼83%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
331554 Points ∼94% +13%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
252308 Points ∼71% -14%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points ∼72% -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
282385 Points ∼80% -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
291387 Points ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points ∼79% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (279048 - 292450, n=3)
286602 Points ∼81% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=176, last 2 years)
352957 Points ∼100% +21%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2538 Score ∼77%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2568 Score ∼78% +1%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2506 Score ∼76% -1%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1899 Score ∼58% -25%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2373 Score ∼72% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2373 - 2538, n=2)
2456 Score ∼75% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=53, last 2 years)
3281 Score ∼100% +29%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4958 Points ∼7%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4989 Points ∼7% +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points ∼18% +149%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points ∼19% +165%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4989 Points ∼7% +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
35458 Points ∼52% +615%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4958 - 35458, n=3)
15145 Points ∼22% +205%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 273221, n=84, last 2 years)
68835 Points ∼100% +1288%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.82 (1629min - 40.39max) fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
27.32 fps ∼36% -5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23.47 fps ∼31% -19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.91 (13.01min - 32.04max) fps ∼30% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
28.8 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.7 - 1902, n=51, last 2 years)
75.6 fps ∼100% +162%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.12 (16.2min - 63.34max) fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
24.34 fps ∼36% -13%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
20.93 fps ∼31% -26%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
20.52 (11.64min - 35.95max) fps ∼30% -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
28.1 fps ∼41% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 1736, n=50, last 2 years)
68.3 fps ∼100% +143%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
232.33 (92.39min - 1023.24max) fps ∼78%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
194.39 fps ∼65% -16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
198.56 (77.43min - 1345.87max) fps ∼67% -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
232 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (36.2 - 2982, n=45, last 2 years)
298 fps ∼100% +28%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.78 (16.88min - 48.34max) fps ∼37%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26.49 fps ∼34% -8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
44.63 fps ∼58% +55%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.85 (12.92min - 52.46max) fps ∼30% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
28.8 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.79 - 1962, n=49, last 2 years)
77.4 fps ∼100% +169%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
25.21 (14.33min - 52.34max) fps ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
23.36 fps ∼35% -7%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
18.02 fps ∼27% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
25.2 fps ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 1746, n=49, last 2 years)
67.2 fps ∼100% +167%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3365 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3688 Points ∼95% +10%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points ∼70% -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points ∼78% -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3387 Points ∼87% +1%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3654 Points ∼94% +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points ∼89% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3617, n=3)
3486 Points ∼90% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=188, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼100% +16%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
5972 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7033 Points ∼100% +18%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points ∼71% -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points ∼81% -5%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6617 Points ∼94% +11%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7064 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points ∼93% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (5972 - 6752, n=3)
6422 Points ∼91% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=188, last 2 years)
7051 Points ∼100% +18%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4043 Points ∼85%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4687 Points ∼98% +16%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points ∼69% -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points ∼88% +4%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4297 Points ∼90% +6%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4769 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4041 - 4353, n=3)
4146 Points ∼87% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=188, last 2 years)
4581 Points ∼96% +13%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144