Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review: Dream display for anti-5G users at a bargain price

Mid-range game changer. A 120 Hz OLED panel in a mid-range phone with a powerful Snapdragon SoC and a 108 MP camera for less than 280 Euros (~$336)? Not too long ago, these were features of a premium smartphone. Our review of the Xiaomi smartphone reveals how the affordable Redmi Note 10 Pro fares apart from the 6.67-inch AMOLED Dot display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Just last year, Xiaomi defined the display standard for the mid-range in terms of 60 Hz panels with the AMOLED panels in the Mi 10 Lite and Mi Note 10 Lite. This year, the Chinese manufacturer raises the bar even higher with the Redmi Note 10 Pro, because the panel of the affordable mid-range phone now relies on a high refresh rate of 120 Hz.

Besides the organic display, the Note 10 Pro also offers additional equipment highlights, such as the 108-megapixel main camera and 33-watt fast charging. A Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G runs internally, which is supported by 6 GB or 8 GB of RAM as well as up to 128 GB of flash storage. The following variants are available:

I. 64 GB storage/6 GB RAM: 280 Euros (~$336) MSRP).

II. 128 GB storage/6 GB RAM: 300 Euros (~$359) (MSRP)

III. 128 GB storage/8 GB RAM: 330 Euros (~$395) (MSRP)

Users who can do without the 120 Hz can consider the smaller brother, the Note 10, a possible alternative within the Redmi series; it was introduced together with the Pro model.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Redmi Note 12 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G 8 x 2.3 GHz, Kryo 470 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, AMOLED Dot display, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 107 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD slot (dedicated, up to 512 GB, exFAT support), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, IR blaster, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, 4G: LTE FDD B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20/28/32, B38/40/41(2535–2655 MHz); 3G: WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8; 2G: GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.1 x 164 x 76.5 ( = 0.32 x 6.46 x 3.01 in)
Battery
5020 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (0.7 μm pixel, 1/1.52", f/1.9); 8 MP (118°, f/2.2); 5 MP (f/2.4); 2 MP (f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.45)
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: on-screen, Case, charger, USB cable, MIUI 12, 12 Months Warranty, SAR value: 0.597 W/​kg head, 0.994 W/​kg body, Widevine L1, fanless
Weight
193 g ( = 6.81 oz / 0.43 pounds), Power Supply: 93 g ( = 3.28 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.7 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
82.1 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
79.3 %
03/2021
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
205 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"1600x720
80.1 %
01/2021
Oppo A73 5G
Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3
177 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080
81.3 %
12/2020
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.49"2400x1080
81.3 %
02/2021
Motorola Moto G 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
212 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.70"2400x1080
81.8 %
10/2020
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
SD 732G, Adreno 618
215 g64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case - Xiaomi phone with punch hole

Redmi Note 10 Pro in Gradient Bronze
Redmi Note 10 Pro in Gradient Bronze
Redmi Note 10 Pro in Glacier Blue
Redmi Note 10 Pro in Glacier Blue

The front of the Note 10 Pro is made of a scratch-resistant Gorilla Glass 5 display glass that is flush with the plastic frame. The ratio between the display and the front of the device is a good 86% thanks to the comparatively small punch hole and the relatively narrow screen bezels. The only thing that looks a bit protruding is the "chin".

The transition between the bezel and the glass could have been a bit "rounder" for our taste, but the design is still a bit angular. There are no compromises in terms of feel thanks to the glass back. Besides our test sample in Onyx Gray, Gradient Bronze and Glacier Blue are available as color options.

Stability and workmanship are at a very appealing level. The built-in buttons in particular sit pleasantly firmly in the frame, and even the power button with the integrated fingerprint sensor, which is often a bit wobbly in smartphones, has almost no amount of play in the Note 10 Pro. Furthermore, the case of the Redmi phone has an official IP certification, albeit only according to IP53. The water-repellent coating protects the Note 10 Pro from rain and sweat on the inside and outside.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Size comparison

166.1 mm / 6.54 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 9.9 mm / 0.3898 inch 212 g0.4674 lbs165.3 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9.4 mm / 0.3701 inch 215 g0.474 lbs165.38 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 215 g0.474 lbs164.2 mm / 6.46 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 205 g0.4519 lbs164 mm / 6.46 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.95 mm / 0.3524 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs162 mm / 6.38 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 177 g0.3902 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - Redmi Note 10 Pro with 3.5 mm audio jack

The Xiaomi smartphone's equipment list includes a triple card slot, so that the dual-SIM function can be used independently of the dedicated SD card slot, a 3.5 mm audio jack as well as Miracast, and an IR blaster. An always-on display mode is also selectable, but at the time of testing, and as with the Xiaomi Mi 11, it's limited to a few seconds, which makes it more akin to the familiar display-preview feature of Motorola phones.

The internal UFS storage has a capacity of 128 GB in our review sample, but 21 GB is already occupied by the system out of the box. The 5,020 mAh battery is charged via a USB-C 2.0 port on the case's bottom. USB OTG is also supported, allowing the Redmi phone to easily connect to memory sticks, for example.

Bottom case side (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Bottom case side (microphone, USB port, speaker)
Top case side (IR blaster, microphone, speaker, 3.5 mm audio jack)
Top case side (IR blaster, microphone, speaker, 3.5 mm audio jack)
Right case side (buttons)
Right case side (buttons)
Left case side (card slot)
Left case side (card slot)

microSD reader

We take a look at the speed of the Redmi Note 10 Pro's card slot with our Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 reference memory card. While the results in the CPDT benchmark are appealing, the performance in our JPEG Copy test is less convincing at a good 13 MB/s.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
50.3 MB/s +278%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.29 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø83.3 (23.8-89.8)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø74.7 (45.4-80.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø37.2 (26.8-48.4)
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø40.8 (34.7-52.4)

Software - Xiaomi phone with MIUI 12

Google's Android version 11 with security patches from March 2021 is used as the operating system. The Chinese manufacturer has implemented its in-house user interface, MIUI 12.0.10, on top of it.

The MIUI 12 user interface is more reminiscent of Apple's iOS than of the underlying Android operating system due to the separate notification center, the app switcher, and the design of the control center, but it offers a lot of customization options and a well-optimized system interface. However, Xiaomi also preinstalls many third-party apps, but they can be uninstalled.

Video content from streaming services can be watched in HD quality with the Redmi Note 10 Pro, since the Widevine L1 certification process has been performed.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Communication and GNSS - Xiaomi smartphone without 5G

In terms of communication modules, Xiaomi relies on the a/b/g/n/ac WLAN standard, Bluetooth version 5.1, and an NFC chip, which enables contactless payments with the Redmi phone.

The budget mid-range phone offers solid and stable transfer rates within the home Wi-Fi network. In combination with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router, the Note 10 Pro achieves average speeds of about 330 Mb/s for receiving data and 280 Mb/s for sending data, which is satisfactory for a smartphone in this price range but is clearly surpassed by the Poco X3 NFC or the OnePlus Nord N10 5G. Even the predecessor offered faster Wi-Fi speeds.

The X15 modem enables the Xiaomi smartphone to access mobile Internet at a maximum speed of 4G, so the faster 5G standard is not supported. The Note 10 Pro only supports access to a total of 13 LTE bands, but it covers all LTE frequencies relevant for Germany - including band 28.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (604min - 684max) MBit/s +135%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (603min - 673max) MBit/s +135%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
633 (589min - 676max) MBit/s +124%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s +95%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s +95%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
346 (324min - 360max) MBit/s +22%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (323min - 361max) MBit/s +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s +102%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (596min - 664max) MBit/s +95%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
636 (500min - 675max) MBit/s +92%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (481min - 662max) MBit/s +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 720G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
619 (283min - 670max) MBit/s +87%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
376 MBit/s +14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
366 (347min - 374max) MBit/s +11%
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
340 (313min - 353max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø325 (158-339)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø278 (148-297)
Positioning indoors
Positioning indoors
Positioning outdoors
Positioning outdoors

The Redmi Note 10 Pro uses the main satellite systems GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1), and Galileo (E1) to determine its position. This procedure takes place quickly and with an accuracy of three meters. Even indoors, positioning is quite fast but a bit less accurate at five meters.

In order to assess the positioning accuracy in practice, we take the Xiaomi smartphone on a short trip and track the route with a Garmin Edge 500 in parallel for comparison purposes. About 190 meters lie between the smartphone's GPS module and the navigation device at the end of the 6-kilometer test route. When looking at the detailed view of the GPS log, there are no major inaccuracies found in the Redmi phone's route.

Positioning of the Redmi Note 10 Pro in comparison with the Garmin Edge 500
Positioning of the Redmi Note 10 Pro in comparison with the Garmin Edge 500
Positioning of the Redmi Note 10 Pro in comparison with the Garmin Edge 500

Telephone and call quality - Redmi Note 10 Pro with dual SIM

There is nothing to complain about in terms of call quality with the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Voices are reproduced intelligibly and also characterized as being clear by our conversation partner. Skype video calls using the built-in front-facing camera and the speaker also worked smoothly in our test.

Thanks to Wi-Fi calling, the Xiaomi phone can be used to make calls over a Wi-Fi network when mobile reception is limited. Furthermore, calls can be made via LTE networks thanks to the VoLTE feature.

Cameras - Xiaomi phone with 108 MP camera

Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Portrait Mode
Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Portrait Mode
Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Photo Mode
Photo taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro's front-facing camera in Photo Mode

The main camera of the quad-cam setup is reportedly based on the 1/1.52-inch Samsung ISOCELL HM2 with a resolution of 108 MP - but the 9-in-1 binning technology stores photos with a resolution of 12 MP and a pixel size of 2.1 μm by default. In addition, there's an 8 MP ultra wide-angle lens, a 5 MP lens for macro shots, and a 2 MP depth sensor.

In practice, the wide-angle module delivers good results, especially in view of the MSRP of under 300 Euros (~$359). Photos taken with the 108 MP sensor score points with a good dynamic range and appealing sharpness. Even in low light, the pictures' brightness is appealing, but image sharpness decreases increasingly in the dark. Although there is no dedicated telephoto lens, zoom shots with a magnification of up to 5x still look quite decent.

The ultra wide-angle lens with a relatively wide field of view of 123° also provides very decent image quality. However, the photos taken with the Redmi Note 10 Pro present artifacts and pronounced blurriness at the edges. Both the image details and dynamics as well as the color reproduction are able to convince, though. As is typical in this price range, the resolution of the ultra wide-angle lens is quite low at only 8 MP.

As a result, video recorded with the ultra wide-angle lens are limited to a maximum of Full HD quality. With the 108 MP sensor, videos can also be shot in UHD at 30 fps. However, those who want to use a higher frame rate will have to settle for 1080p at up to 60 fps. Moreover, it's not possible to switch between the two lenses while a video recording is in progress.

The front-facing camera, which has been placed in a central punch-hole cutout, has a resolution of 16 MP. The results are quite respectable for a budget mid-range phone. Selfies have a solid base sharpness, and the exposure and blur effect in Portrait Mode are usually consistent.

Ultra wide-angle camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
Ultra wide-angle camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
108 MP main camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
108 MP main camera in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
2x zoom
5x zoom
10x zoom (max)
108 MP mode
Ultra wide-angle camera
108 MP main camera
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleLow light5x zoom Ultra wide angle

Under controlled lighting conditions, we subject the rear 108 MP camera to further tests. We use the ColorChecker Passport to analyze color reproduction in comparison to the actual reference colors, once under full studio lighting and once at 1 lux light intensity.

Colors are hit really well with the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Blue tones are brightened, but the deviations don't reveal any real weaknesses for a 280-Euro (~$335) phone - for comparison, the differences to the reference colors are slightly higher in the Xiaomi Mi 11 with a Delta E value of 11.14.

The image sharpness in our test chart is not very pronounced, and slight color distortions are also visible.

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro: 7.54 ∆E min: 2.46 - max: 13.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
60.4 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
63.1 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
35.8 ∆E
74.7 ∆E
42.3 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.9 ∆E
51.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro: 45.6 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 85.53 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Xiaomi phone with case

The Redmi Note 10 Pro includes a case in the box
The Redmi Note 10 Pro includes a case in the box
The power adapter of the Redmi Note 10 Pro
The power adapter of the Redmi Note 10 Pro

The Redmi Note 10 Pro comes with a 33-watt modular power adapter and a USB cable. A quality protective case is also included with the Xiaomi phone, and a protective film is also installed out of the box. The Chinese manufacturer hasn't listed any special accessories in its online store so far.

There's a 12-month warranty after the purchase date.

Input devices and handling - Redmi Note 10 Pro with 240 Hz

Not only does using the Note 10 Pro benefit from the high refresh rate of 120 Hz, but also from the sampling rate of 240 Hz. The capacitive multi-touchscreen is consequently monitored for taps up to 240 times per second (in games, among other things). The Xiaomi phone can also be operated correspondingly accurately.

The active fingerprint sensor, which is integrated into the on/off button, responds quickly and also recognizes fingers very precisely. It's position has been chosen comfortably. Those who want to use facial data to unlock the display can do so via the front-facing camera. However, biometric identification using a face is less secure due to the utilization of a 2D method.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review

Display - Redmi Note 10 Pro with a 120 Hz OLED

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
PWM in the Redmi Note 10 Pro at 55%
PWM in the Redmi Note 10 Pro at 55%

Xiaomi uses a 6.67-inch, HDR10-certified AMOLED panel with a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels and a refresh rate of 120 Hz in its mid-range phone. Furthermore, the Chinese manufacturer specifies a peak brightness of 1,200 nits for the Note 10 Pro. We can't quite completely reach these rates even in the APL50 test (991 cd/m²), but brightness is certainly not bad for HDR content - especially since the APL10 test definitely leaves some headroom. Even in our measurements with a white background, the AMOLED display manages a high luminance for this price range at 653 cd/m² with a very homogeneous brightness distribution.

It should be noted that the display is set to 60 Hz by default, and it has to be manually changed to a refresh rate of 120 Hz in the display settings. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro doesn't offer an adaptive refresh rate like in the Xiaomi Mi 11. Therefore, the display operates either with a refresh rate of 60 Hz or 120 Hz.

For brightness control, the Xiaomi smartphone uses pulse width modulation (PWM) at a quite high frequency of 263-490 Hz as soon as brightness is dimmed to below 55%. Above that, we measure a frequency of 120 Hz, but the fluctuations in amplitude are much lower here. We didn't find a DC-dimming mode in the settings menus.

648
cd/m²
646
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
648
cd/m²
660
cd/m²
652
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 660 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 650.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 653 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.50
Oppo A73 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.50
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.49
Motorola Moto G 5G
LTPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-60%
-134%
-76%
-57%
-31%
-36%
-19%
Brightness middle
653
606
-7%
543
-17%
527
-19%
450
-31%
586
-10%
623
-5%
610
-7%
Brightness
651
574
-12%
512
-21%
499
-23%
422
-35%
565
-13%
600
-8%
579
-11%
Brightness Distribution
98
89
-9%
85
-13%
87
-11%
89
-9%
88
-10%
93
-5%
92
-6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.63
0.38
0.57
0.61
0.54
0.37
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
2.4
-100%
4.9
-308%
3.5
-192%
2.67
-123%
1.74
-45%
1.8
-50%
1.8
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
5.3
-83%
8.6
-197%
7.3
-152%
6.76
-133%
4.09
-41%
4.7
-62%
3
-3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
4.5
-150%
6.3
-250%
2.9
-61%
2
-11%
3
-67%
3.3
-83%
2.5
-39%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.21 100%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.274 97%
2.244 98%
2.26 97%
2.31 95%
CCT
6426 101%
6224 104%
8120 80%
6502 100%
6859 95%
6000 108%
6712 97%
6864 95%
Contrast
1377
862
1387
789
961
1154
1649

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 490.2 Hz ≤ 54 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 490.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 54 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 490.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

As in every OLED panel, the AMOLED Dot display in the Note 10 Pro completely turns off individual pixels, which results in an "absolute" black, and contrast theoretically tends towards infinity. In our tests with the CalMAN software and a spectrophotometer, the Xiaomi smartphone's display proves to be very well calibrated, and it delivers very low color deviations in the Standard profile.

In addition to "Standard", which covers most of the sRGB color space, the display settings also include the "Saturated" profile and the automatic profile; the latter is set by default and offers an almost full reproduction of the DCI-P3 color space. However, the Delta E color deviations are higher here.

Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Color accuracy (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Color space (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Color space (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Grayscales (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Saturation (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)
Saturation (target color space: sRGB, profile: Standard)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

The Redmi Note 10 Pro leaves a good impression outdoors. Thanks to pronounced contrasts and a relatively high brightness, outdoor readability is possible even in direct sunlight. It should be noted that the maximum luminance without the brightness sensor is only 419 cd/m².

As is typical for OLEDs, the viewing angles of the Redmi phone are also very good. A decrease in brightness is hardly noticeable when the panel is tilted slightly, and colors are relatively stable at very flat viewing angles.

Viewing angles in the Redmi Note 10 Pro
Viewing angles in the Redmi Note 10 Pro

Performance - Xiaomi smartphone with Snapdragon SoC

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G is an SoC manufactured in an 8 nm process with a total of eight cores that are divided into two clusters. While the performance cluster contains two fast Cortex-A76 cores that clock at up to 2.3 GHz in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, the power-saving cluster contains six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores (1.8 GHz). The Big.LITTLE concept allows both clusters to run simultaneously.

The "G" in the name indicates that the SoC is optimized for gaming performance. According to Qualcomm, some Wi-Fi features have been adjusted for this purpose as well as the graphics card accelerated. The latter is a Qualcomm Adreno 618.

In our benchmark package, the Xiaomi phone delivers decent performance. The Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro is on par with the Poco X3 NFC, and the Snapdragon 750G in the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G is also partly outperformed. However, the UFS storage's rates in the AndroBench benchmarks are strikingly weak. The 2.2 standard performs more at the level of the relatively slow UFS 2.1 storage here. The AIMark results are also very low compared to the Poco Phone.

System speed is satisfactory in everyday use, and it ensures smooth operation in combination with the 6 GB of RAM and the 120 Hz refresh rate. However, small micro stutters can be noticed from time to time in the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Whether this is due to the somewhat too low performance of the Adreno 618, or if it might eventually be fixed by optimization processes in the MIUI interface is something that remains to be seen. Nevertheless, the Xiaomi phone has slight performance problems and stutters more strongly as soon as the system is put under heavy load, such as when a number of apps are installed in the background.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
472 Points -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
516 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
610 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
657 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
567 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (563 - 567, n=3)
565 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=211, last 2 years)
900 Points +60%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1511 Points -13%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1638 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1873 Points +8%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1987 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1787 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1728 - 1792, n=3)
1769 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=211, last 2 years)
2944 Points +70%
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1182 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1081 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1418 Points +20%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
905 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1143 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1090 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1030 - 1182, n=3)
1101 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (79 - 9992, n=89, last 2 years)
4117 Points +248%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1293 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1227 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1525 Points +18%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1537 Points +19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
981 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1245 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1291 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1211 - 1293, n=3)
1265 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 10711, n=81, last 2 years)
3917 Points +203%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8543 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
7158 Points -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
10673 Points +25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
10321 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9794 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8773 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8543 - 8773, n=2)
8658 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10884 - 19297, n=2, last 2 years)
15091 Points +77%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8688 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6145 Points -29%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
7395 Points -15%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8021 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
8076 Points -7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
8101 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (8064 - 8688, n=3)
8284 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9101 - 12871, n=4, last 2 years)
10872 Points +25%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23548 Points
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
35182 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
39807 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40955 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
40955 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
29682 Points
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
44899 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
54788 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
56640 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
56640 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13664 Points
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
19976 Points
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
20351 Points
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20797 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
20797 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4021 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3499 Points -13%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3521 Points -12%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3208 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3998 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3784 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3784 - 4021, n=3)
3908 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (712 - 7285, n=52, last 2 years)
3548 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4232 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3805 Points -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3694 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3197 Points -24%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4097 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3917 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3917 - 4232, n=3)
4087 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (618 - 9451, n=52, last 2 years)
3905 Points -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3375 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2730 Points -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3024 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3257 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3657 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3382 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3382, n=3)
3374 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1093 - 4525, n=52, last 2 years)
3005 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3887 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3713 Points -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3377 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3327 Points -14%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4098 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3918 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3887 - 3939, n=3)
3915 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (704 - 23024, n=115, last 2 years)
9038 Points +133%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4038 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3975 Points -2%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3497 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3307 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4211 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4038 - 4256, n=3)
4127 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 45492, n=114, last 2 years)
15757 Points +290%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3018 Points -10%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3014 Points -11%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3984 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3425 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3125 - 3425, n=3)
3307 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1075 - 8749, n=114, last 2 years)
4335 Points +29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2783 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2575 Points -7%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2529 Points -9%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2198 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2798 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2713 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2713 - 2783, n=3)
2752 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=102, last 2 years)
2685 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2694 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2525 Points -6%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2418 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1982 Points -26%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2549 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2559 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2559 - 2694, n=3)
2625 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=102, last 2 years)
2675 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3372 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2765 Points -18%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3011 Points -11%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3265 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3566 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3436 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3372 - 3436, n=3)
3398 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=102, last 2 years)
3127 Points -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2938 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2659 Points -9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2653 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2348 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2956 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2865 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2865 - 2938, n=3)
2913 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=174, last 2 years)
6545 Points +123%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2832 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2597 Points -8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2561 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2187 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2762 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2735 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2735 - 2832, n=3)
2797 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=173, last 2 years)
9330 Points +229%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3311 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2901 Points -12%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3037 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3374 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3659 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3438 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3311 - 3438, n=3)
3383 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (938 - 8480, n=173, last 2 years)
4158 Points +26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2610 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2581 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2501 Points -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2410 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2081 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2601 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2506 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2506 - 2610, n=3)
2570 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (365 - 6439, n=96, last 2 years)
2611 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2562 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2510 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2461 Points -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2354 Points -8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1932 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2479 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2427 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2427 - 2562, n=3)
2508 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 8601, n=96, last 2 years)
2775 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2773 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2864 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2651 Points -4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2631 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2769 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
2876 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2827 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2773 - 2828, n=3)
2809 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1667 - 3525, n=96, last 2 years)
2671 Points -4%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1143 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1245 Points +9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1233 Points +8%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
821 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3658 Points +220%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
835 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (835 - 1143, n=3)
1031 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 9839, n=130, last 2 years)
2548 Points +123%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1124 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1094 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1215 Points +8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1207 Points +7%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
809 Points -28%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1098 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
720 Points -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (720 - 1124, n=3)
985 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=193, last 2 years)
6048 Points +438%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
81 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
50 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
60 fps -26%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
55 fps -32%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
58 fps -28%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
60 fps -26%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
60 fps -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (60 - 81, n=3)
74 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (22 - 165, n=177, last 2 years)
83.6 fps +3%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
90 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
68 fps -25%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
67 fps -26%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
73 fps -20%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
90 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
91 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (91 - 91, n=3)
91 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (19 - 791, n=177, last 2 years)
243 fps +167%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
40 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
54 fps +35%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps -7%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
33 fps -17%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
40 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (34 - 43, n=3)
39 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.8 - 165, n=178, last 2 years)
71.3 fps +78%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
45 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
41 fps -9%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
37 fps -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
37 fps -18%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
45 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
45 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (45 - 45, n=3)
45 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.2 - 363, n=178, last 2 years)
137.9 fps +206%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
29 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
51 fps +76%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
24 fps -17%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
23 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
29 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28 fps -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (28 - 32, n=3)
29.7 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.7 - 158, n=178, last 2 years)
60.2 fps +108%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
26 fps -21%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
27 fps -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
33 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
33 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (33 - 33, n=3)
33 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (6.2 - 279, n=178, last 2 years)
97 fps +194%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
23 fps +35%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13 fps -24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps -24%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
16 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
17 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (17 - 18, n=3)
17.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 117, n=178, last 2 years)
42.9 fps +152%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
13 fps -32%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps -21%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps -26%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
18 fps -5%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
19 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (19 - 19, n=3)
19 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.9 - 166, n=178, last 2 years)
58.6 fps +208%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
30 fps +67%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
15 fps -17%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
17 fps -6%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
18 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.3 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=218, last 2 years)
43.3 fps +141%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
21 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
17 fps -19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
19 fps -10%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
20 fps -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (20 - 21, n=3)
20.3 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=218, last 2 years)
62.9 fps +200%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
17 fps +55%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
9.2 fps -16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8.7 fps -21%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
11 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
11 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (11 - 12, n=3)
11.3 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.8 - 105, n=218, last 2 years)
32.2 fps +193%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.4 fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
6.2 fps -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
6.1 fps -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps -22%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7.5 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
7.5 fps +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (7.4 - 7.5, n=3)
7.43 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=218, last 2 years)
25 fps +238%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
292450 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
331554 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
252308 Points -14%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
253013 Points -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
282385 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
291387 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
279048 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (279048 - 292450, n=3)
286602 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (last 2 years)
101336 Points -65%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2538 Score
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2568 Score +1%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2506 Score -1%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1899 Score -25%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
2373 Score -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (2373 - 2538, n=2)
2456 Score -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1010 - 10071, n=14, last 2 years)
5281 Score +108%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4958 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4989 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
12331 Points +149%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
13120 Points +165%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4989 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
35458 Points +615%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4958 - 35458, n=3)
15145 Points +205%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 139804, n=54, last 2 years)
20600 Points +315%
Basemark GPU 1.2
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.82 (1629min - 40.39max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
27.32 fps -5%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
23.47 fps -19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.91 (13.01min - 32.04max) fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
28.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.65 - 13860, n=54, last 2 years)
328 fps +1038%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.12 (16.2min - 63.34max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
24.34 fps -13%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
20.93 fps -26%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
20.52 (11.64min - 35.95max) fps -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
28.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.3 - 9309, n=53, last 2 years)
238 fps +746%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
232.3 (92.39min - 1023.24max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
194.4 fps -16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
198.6 (77.43min - 1345.87max) fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
232 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.12 - 39496, n=54, last 2 years)
1381 fps +494%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
28.78 (16.88min - 48.34max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26.49 fps -8%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
44.63 fps +55%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.85 (12.92min - 52.46max) fps -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
28.8 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.51 - 15712, n=54, last 2 years)
412 fps +1332%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
25.21 (14.33min - 52.34max) fps
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
23.36 fps -7%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
18.02 fps -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
25.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 14706, n=53, last 2 years)
344 fps +1265%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3365 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3688 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2735 Points -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
3019 Points -10%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3387 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3654 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3477 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3365 - 3617, n=3)
3486 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=158, last 2 years)
5704 Points +70%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
5972 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7033 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
4995 Points -16%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
5692 Points -5%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6617 Points +11%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7064 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
6542 Points +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (5972 - 6752, n=3)
6422 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=158, last 2 years)
9621 Points +61%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4043 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4687 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
3281 Points -19%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
4185 Points +4%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4297 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4769 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4041 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (4041 - 4353, n=3)
4146 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12306, n=158, last 2 years)
6230 Points +54%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3947 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
2687 Points -34%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
2687 Points -34%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3321 Points -19%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3987 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3960 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (3960 - 4157, n=3)
4068 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
13900 Points +240%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1228 Points
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1422 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 4096
1271 Points +4%
Oppo A73 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3, 8192
1297 Points +6%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1354 Points +10%
Motorola Moto G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1233 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1395 Points +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
  (1228 - 1401, n=3)
1341 Points +9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=158, last 2 years)
1487 Points +21%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=167, last 2 years)
104 Points +110%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
52.8 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
52.7 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
52.6 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (49.5 - 53.4, n=3)
51.8 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
49.47 Points
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
36.3 Points -27%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
34 Points -31%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
16.42 Points -67%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
93 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (89.8 - 92.4, n=3)
90.9 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
90.6 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
89.8 Points
Average of class Smartphone (66.1 - 104.3, n=2, last 2 years)
85.2 Points -5%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
70.1 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
67.3 Points -25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
23.75 Points -74%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=151, last 2 years)
104.7 runs/min +142%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
46.2 runs/min +7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
43.9 runs/min +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
43.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (41.4 - 43.9, n=3)
42.8 runs/min -1%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
37.7 runs/min -13%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
13.3 runs/min -69%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (37 - 304, n=118, last 2 years)
130.7 Points +84%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
76 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
72 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (71 - 73, n=3)
72 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
71 Points
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
51 Points -28%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
49 Points -31%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
29 Points -59%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=202, last 2 years)
33355 Points +93%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
17809 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
17786 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (17293 - 17817, n=3)
17503 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
17398 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
17293 Points
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
14886 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
14156 Points -18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
4395 Points -75%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
12192 ms * -331%
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83)
4059 ms * -43%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88)
3467 ms * -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
2832 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (2673 - 2832, n=2)
2753 ms * +3%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85)
2673 ms * +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
2623 ms * +7%
Motorola Moto G 5G (Chrome88)
2468 ms * +13%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=165, last 2 years)
1658 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GSamsung Galaxy A32 5GOppo A73 5GOnePlus Nord N10 5GMotorola Moto G 5GXiaomi Poco X3 NFCSamsung Galaxy A52 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
51%
40%
-5%
4%
23%
-16%
56%
51%
166%
Sequential Read 256KB
512
938
83%
858
68%
860
68%
865
69%
822
61%
506
-1%
927
81%
708 ?(303 - 1038, n=59)
38%
1468 ?(215 - 4512, n=210, last 2 years)
187%
Sequential Write 256KB
268
463.5
73%
381.7
42%
193
-28%
187.2
-30%
243
-9%
173.1
-35%
484.6
81%
517 ?(105.3 - 903, n=59)
93%
1078 ?(57.5 - 3678, n=210, last 2 years)
302%
Random Read 4KB
146.5
176.6
21%
174.6
19%
102.2
-30%
137
-6%
157.8
8%
123.4
-16%
176.1
20%
187.1 ?(89.3 - 297, n=59)
28%
242 ?(22.2 - 543, n=210, last 2 years)
65%
Random Write 4KB
126.7
162.3
28%
167.1
32%
88.1
-30%
106
-16%
167.8
32%
112.6
-11%
179.2
41%
181 ?(68.8 - 419, n=59)
43%
266 ?(13 - 709, n=210, last 2 years)
110%

Games - Xiaomi phone manages 90 fps

Besides GPU benchmarks, we determine the frame rates of modern Android games with the Gamebench app. The Adreno 618 that's integrated into the Qualcomm SoC even allows the smooth rendering of more complex 3D games from the Android Play Store, at least at low details.

Asphalt 9: Legends and PUBG Mobile are rendered relatively consistently at 30 fps and high graphics, although the racing game from Gameloft shows short but significant frame-rate drops. If the graphical details of the first-person shooter are reduced, the Redmi Note 10 Pro can even achieve 40 fps.

The 120 Hz display should also allow smoother graphics that exceed 40 fps; we test this with Armajet, which theoretically supports up to 144 Hz. However, the Xiaomi phone only manages a maximum peak of 90 fps.

Asphalt 9: Legends
Asphalt 9: Legends
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; Armajet: Ø65.7 (51-90)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low: Ø29.5 (21-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality: Ø29.6 (24-32)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø39.7 (28-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Balanced: Ø39.8 (36-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø29.8 (23-31)

Emissions - Cool Redmi Note 10 Pro

Temperature

The surface temperatures are very low in idle usage. Under load, the Note 10 Pro gets warmer with a maximum of 39 °C (~102 °F). With the GFXBench app's battery test, we also analyze the Qualcomm SoC's temperature behavior under continuous load. The respective scenarios are run 30 times in a row here, and various parameters are logged.

The Snapdragon 732G throttles less than 1% in the demanding Manhattan test (OpenGL ES 3.1). In addition, we test the Qualcomm chipset with the 3DMark Wild Life stress test. A very steady performance can be observed here as well.

 
 
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo A73 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (1097min - 1100max) % 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (1111min - 1117max) %
Motorola Moto G 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 (1096min - 1088max) % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
Mali-G57 MP3, Dimensity 720, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
98.9 (1240min - 1254max) % -1%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
96.6 (807min - 835max) % -3%
Max. Load
 38.7 °C
102 F
38 °C
100 F
35.7 °C
96 F
 
 38.3 °C
101 F
37.9 °C
100 F
35.3 °C
96 F
 
 36.8 °C
98 F
37 °C
99 F
34.8 °C
95 F
 
Maximum: 38.7 °C = 102 F
Average: 36.9 °C = 98 F
33.5 °C
92 F
35.2 °C
95 F
37.6 °C
100 F
33.3 °C
92 F
35.8 °C
96 F
36.7 °C
98 F
32 °C
90 F
34 °C
93 F
33.6 °C
92 F
Maximum: 37.6 °C = 100 F
Average: 34.6 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  26.9 °C = 80 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.7 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

Not only does the Redmi Note 10 Pro use two speakers, but they also sound good. The dual-speaker system gets very loud at over 89 d(B), and we really like the sound quality, even though the low sound ranges are reproduced too thinly, and the super high tones sink a bit.

Bluetooth can be used wirelessly for media playback. The audio codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX adaptive as well as LHDC and LDAC are supported. The mid-range phone also offers an audio jack. The 3.5 mm jack produces a clean sound with low noise levels - we measure a very good SNR value of 104.84 dBFS.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.633.62534.726.83124.7284023.534.25042.443.46328.431.48023.931.510020.43212515.333.41602046.220014.644.325013.151.83151459.64001163.250010.3686301170.380010.273.4100010.375.8125010.874.5160010.977.5200011.680.8250012.279.5315012.280400012.577.8500013.478.5630013.176.580001574.21000013.873.91250014.165.1160001660.6SPL24.789.3N0.677.5median 13.1median 73.9Delta210.535.944.92942.825.144.231.445.142.446.132.448.52647.821.547.41549.121.350.914.453.81457.513.559.511.964.312.265.512.666.513.471.712.275.712.37812.779.913.580.9138312.885.113.782.313.583.613.881.714.783.313.680.214.2731571.125.793.20.795median 13.5median 75.7110.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProSamsung Galaxy A32 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Xiaomi phone with 5,020 mAh

Energy consumption

Energy is supplied by a 5,020 mAh lithium-polymer battery that can be recharged in pretty much exactly 90 minutes with the included 33-watt power adapter when it's completely drained.

The Note 10 Pro's power consumption could be a bit lower in idle mode, but overall, power consumption is okay for a 120 Hz smartphone.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.14 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.05 / 1.8 / 1.85 Watt
Load midlight 4.2 / 6.29 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
4820 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
4300 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-24%
17%
-12%
-26%
-21%
-7%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
1.05
0.5
52%
0.64
39%
0.58
45%
0.9
14%
1.3
-24%
0.93
11%
0.93 ?(0.81 - 1.05, n=3)
11%
0.894 ?(0.42 - 2.37, n=157, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
1.8
2.1
-17%
1.95
-8%
1.86
-3%
1.6
11%
1.5
17%
2.47
-37%
2.09 ?(1.8 - 2.47, n=3)
-16%
1.452 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=157, last 2 years)
19%
Idle Maximum *
1.85
2.13
-15%
1.98
-7%
1.88
-2%
2.1
-14%
2.1
-14%
2.51
-36%
2.13 ?(1.85 - 2.51, n=3)
-15%
1.632 ?(0.79 - 4.45, n=157, last 2 years)
12%
Load Average *
4.2
5.39
-28%
6.77
-61%
3.1
26%
6.2
-48%
7
-67%
5.62
-34%
4.6 ?(3.97 - 5.62, n=3)
-10%
5.55 ?(2.4 - 16.5, n=157, last 2 years)
-32%
Load Maximum *
6.29
7.4
-18%
11.42
-82%
5.01
20%
7.8
-24%
8.9
-41%
6.93
-10%
6.5 ?(6.27 - 6.93, n=3)
-3%
8.23 ?(4.32 - 20.8, n=157, last 2 years)
-31%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The Note 10 Pro lasted 12.5 hours in our Wi-Fi test with an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m², which should even get heavy users through the day. If the battery capacity is running low at the end of the day, switching to 60 Hz mode can still squeeze a few battery percent points out of the Xiaomi phone. We reach 887 minutes here.

During our continuous video playback with the Wi-Fi module deactivated, the battery keeps the 6.67-inch OLED panel and its 120 Hz alive for 8 hours longer than in the Wi-Fi test.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
24h 49min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 43min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
4820 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo A73 5G
4040 mAh
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
4300 mAh
Motorola Moto G 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC
5160 mAh
Battery Runtime
32%
52%
89%
23%
40%
27%
Reader / Idle
1489
2870
93%
2958
99%
2539
71%
2427
63%
H.264
1232
1234
0%
1323
7%
1154
-6%
1188
-4%
WiFi v1.3
753
1096
46%
1235
64%
1426
89%
974
29%
1056
40%
1116
48%
Load
283
250
-12%
393
39%
278
-2%
280
-1%

Pros

+ bright 120 Hz OLED panel
+ good workmanship
+ connectivity (3.5 mm jack, triple card slot, ...)
+ good battery life and fast charging
+ stereo speakers
+ good fingerprint scanner

Cons

- No 5G
- performance (for 120 Hz)
- WLAN and UFS storage could be faster

Verdict on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro - The mid-range display king has a name

In review: Redmi Note 10 Pro. Test device provided by Xiaomi Germany.
In review: Redmi Note 10 Pro. Test device provided by Xiaomi Germany.

With the Redmi Note 10 Pro, Xiaomi has managed to create an all-around successful mid-range phone with a focus on the display. The entry into the Redmi Note Pro series is 30 Euros (~$36) more expensive this year than with the predecessor, which, however, is in a different league in terms of the display with its 60 Hz IPS panel. It's precisely in this area that the Redmi Note 10 Pro convinces in every respect. Not only is the 120 Hz panel very smooth and rich in contrast, but it's also very bright.

In addition, the Xiaomi phone offers a good 108 MP camera, stereo speakers, a fast fingerprint reader, and an appealing configuration. The battery life is also very decent in view of the 120 Hz, especially since charging is quite fast thanks to the included 33-watt power adapter.

One of the few weak points of the Redmi Note 10 Pro is the lack of 5G support. The Wi-Fi module and the UFS storage could be a bit faster as well.

Users who can do without 5G will get a very good and also inexpensive mid-range smartphone with the Redmi Note 10 Pro.

Price and availability

The Redmi Note 10 Pro isn't officially available in the United Stated, but you can find some listings on ebay. Keep in mind that the device goes by the name of "Redmi Note 10 Pro Max" in India. You can also keep tabs on Amazon in case that the smartphone pops up here.

If you're in the UK, you're in luck because the Redmi Note 10 Pro is officially sold by Xiaomi and starts at £249 (~$344) for the 6 GB/64 GB version, while the 128 GB model is priced at £269 (~$372).

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro - 08/31/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
52 / 70 → 74%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
32 / 64 → 50%
Application Performance
69 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
90%
Noise
100%
Audio
82 / 90 → 91%
Camera
66%
Average
78%
84%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 9 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro smartphone review: Dream display for anti-5G users at a bargain price
Marcus Herbrich, 2021-04-18 (Update: 2021-04-18)