Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G smartphone review: All-rounder with 120 Hz AMOLED for little money

Golden boy. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a lot of equipment. The Snapdragon 695 5G confers decent performance on the the 6.67-incher, and its 120 Hz AMOLED display manages over 1000 nits of brightness. Not to mention the 108 MP camera and 67-watt fast charging. Our review reveals whether the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has the potential to become a mid-range champion.

Xiaomi's Redmi series enjoys widespread popularity because it offers entry-level and mid-range smartphones with a good price-performance ratio. Features such as an AMOLED screen and 120 Hz refresh rate are not uncommon. Both are available in our review candidate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.

At around US$ 300 (depending on the exact configuration), the 6.67-inch device costs just as much as last year's Redmi Note 10 Pro, but still has a few improvements. These include the faster SoC, 5G, and a higher charging speed. Find out in this review whether the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G lives up to its intended role as a decent all-rounder.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Redmi Note Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, FHD+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 97 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (exFAT supported), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Bands 1/2/4/5/8/19), 4G (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/66), 5G (Bands 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78), Head SAR 0.596 W/kg, Body SAR 0.956 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.12 x 164.19 x 76.1 ( = 0.32 x 6.46 x 3 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.9, 1/1.52", 0.7µm) + 8MP ultra wide camera (f/2.2, FOV 118°) + 2MP macro camera (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.4
Additional features
Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 67W charger, USB cable (type A/C), SIM eject tool, Protective case, Quick start guide, Warranty card, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
202 g ( = 7.13 oz / 0.45 pounds), Power Supply: 99 g ( = 3.49 oz / 0.22 pounds)
Price
380 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.9 %
08/2022
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
202 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
83.7 %
04/2021
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
SD 732G, Adreno 618
193 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
81.7 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G82 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.8 %
07/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.59"2412x1080
80.2 %
05/2022
realme 9 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
191 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
83.4 %
06/2022
Samsung Galaxy A53
Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4
189 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.50"2400x1080

Xiaomi offers the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in the case colors Graphite Gray (black), Polar White (white) and Atlantic Blue (blue). The glass back cover is barely susceptible to fingerprints, while the blue color variant dazzles with its chic light effects. Depending on the viewing angle, the reflections look like water movements, which is particularly noticeable in bright ambient light. The Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G, for example, offers similar color effects on its back cover.

The camera module, including the 108 MP main camera, protrudes almost 4 millimeters from the backcover, causing the smartphone to wobble back and forth quite a bit on the table. Even the included protective cover cannot completely prevent this. The AMOLED screen is protected by Gorilla Glass 5, and a protective film is attached to the screen ex factory.

At a height of 8.1 millimeters, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is just as slim as the Redmi Note 10 Pro, but uses a much flatter and more angular design, ensuring a secure grip when held. At 202 grams, however, the smartphone is not exactly light.

The frame of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is made of plastic and, together with the glass back and AMOLED panel, forms a solid unit that feels high-quality all around. The same applies to the buttons, including the power button with its integrated fingerprint sensor, which sit firmly in the frame. Thanks to IP53 certification, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is dust- and water resistant, but should not go for a swim. 

Size Comparison

164.3 mm / 6.47 inch 75.6 mm / 2.98 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs164.3 mm / 6.47 inch 75.6 mm / 2.98 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 191 g0.4211 lbs164.19 mm / 6.46 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 8.12 mm / 0.3197 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs164 mm / 6.46 inch 76.5 mm / 3.01 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs160.9 mm / 6.33 inch 74.5 mm / 2.93 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs159.6 mm / 6.28 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs

Equipment - Two storage variants

Xiaomi offers the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in two storage variants. The smaller variant houses 6 GB LPDDR4X RAM and 128 GB UFS 2.2 storage, and the larger variant 8/128 GB. Around 97 GB was still available on our review device upon delivery. The internal storage can be expanded via microSD card, which can be up to 1 TB in size.

The OTG-enabled USB port of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G runs at USB 2.0 speed. One of the two speakers (the second one on the top) and the SIM slot are also located on the bottom. Either two nano-SIM cards or one nano-SIM card and a microSD card can be inserted.

In addition to NFC and Bluetooth 5.1, each configuration also includes a 3.5 mm headphone jack, an infrared transmitter, and a fingerprint sensor in the power button. An Always On function is also included. However, the display is not permanently active, but only shows information such as time and battery status for 10 seconds after tapping the screen.

Left: no ports
Left: no ports
Right: volume rocker, power button
Right: volume rocker, power button
Top: 3.5 mm jack, speaker, microphone, IR blaster
Top: 3.5 mm jack, speaker, microphone, IR blaster
Bottom: speakers, microphone, USB-C 2.0, SIM/microSD slot
Bottom: speakers, microphone, USB-C 2.0, SIM/microSD slot

microSD Card Reader

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieves decent microSD transfer rates with our Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD reference card. In sequential reading and writing, they fall within a normal range with an average of 78 MB/s and 32 MB/s, respectively. However, the microSD reader does not perform so well in the JPG copy test, where only a meager 12 MB/s is possible.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
28.9 MB/s ∼100% +138%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s ∼95% +127%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s ∼91% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13.29 MB/s ∼46% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12.13 MB/s ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
10.9 MB/s ∼38% -10%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø32.6 (24.4-44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78.2 (34.6-89.2)

Software - Just Android 11 for the Xiaomi smartphone

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G runs Android 11 and Xiaomi's MIUI user interface, which has since been updated to version 13. At the time of review (mid-August), the Android security patches were from July 1 and thus quite up to date. Preinstalled third-party apps such as Facebook, Tiktok and Spotify can all be deleted.

Thanks to the support of DRM Widevine L1, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is also able to play streams in HD quality. 

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G

Communications & GNSS - 5G, WiFi 5 & good GPS

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports all 4G and 5G frequencies that are important for Europe, so there should hardly be any reception problems in the EU region.

Regarding WLAN, the Xiaomi smartphone uses WiFi 5 to establish connections with nearby routers. In tandem with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieves WLAN transfer rates of around 350 MBit/s on average in both the send and receive directions, which is completely acceptable for this price range. Data transfers are also very stable.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (44.3 - 1736, n=116, last 2 years)
608 MBit/s ∼100% +76%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 (339min - 360max) MBit/s ∼58% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 (334min - 353max) MBit/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
345 (328min - 351max) MBit/s ∼57% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
342 (321min - 351max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
341 (330min - 352max) MBit/s ∼56% -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (57.7 - 1710, n=118, last 2 years)
657 MBit/s ∼100% +86%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
364 (349min - 382max) MBit/s ∼55% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
363 (354min - 376max) MBit/s ∼55% +3%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 (329min - 376max) MBit/s ∼55% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 (180min - 373max) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
269 (255min - 281max) MBit/s ∼41% -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 953, n=146, last 2 years)
461 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
331 (158min - 339max) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1368, n=145, last 2 years)
488 MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
283 (148min - 297max) MBit/s ∼58%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (334-353)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (180-373)
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal outdoors
GPS signal outdoors

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G pinpoints its own location with the help of satellite navigation systems such as GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1) and Beidou (B1). This works accurately up to 3 meters both indoors and outdoors under testing and only takes a few seconds each.

As our bike ride shows, the Xiaomi phone also provides accurate localization data in real-world conditions. The smartphone performs almost as well as the Garmin Venu2 fitness watch, which was used for direct comparison. It occasionally makes one or two small detours in the route, but the overall accuracy is completely sufficient for navigation tasks.

GPS test: summary
GPS test: summary
GPS test: circumnavigation of the lake
GPS test: circumnavigation of the lake
GPS test: loop
GPS test: loop

Telephony & Voice Quality

The voice quality of the Xiaomi smartphone is very good. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G reproduces voices very clearly even in hands-free mode, and the noise suppression still works reliably even in loud environments. There was no background noise or any other abnormalities during our test calls to 4G and 5G networks. The radiation values of 0.596 W/kg (head SAR) and SAR 0.956 W/kg (body SAR) are comparatively low.

Xiaomi's smartphone can either accommodate two nano-SIM cards or one nano-SIM card and one microSD card. VoLTE and WLAN calling are supported.

Cameras - 108 MP camera with Samsung HM2

Photo with the selfie camera
Photo with the selfie camera

The camera setup of the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is largely the same as that of the Redmi Note 10 Pro. The 108 MP main camera (f/1.9) is still based on the Samsung HM2, which takes 12 MP photos using 9-in-1 pixel binning. There is also a 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera with a 118° field of view (f/2.2) and a 16 MP selfie camera (f/2.4). The latter delivers good image quality and takes coherent portrait shots.

Xiaomi has removed the 5 MP macro camera and the 2 MP depth sensor of the Redmi Note 10 Pro from our review sample. Instead of 4 cameras, there are only three in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: The aforementioned main and ultra-wide-angle cameras are joined by a 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4).

Photos taken with the main camera in optimal lighting conditions look really good. The pictures are pleasing thanks to natural-looking colors, high image sharpness and a good dynamic range. The camera software can still get a lot out of the subjects in weaker ambient light.

However, night shots are not the camera's forte. The setup with the NotebookCheck mascot is dark and blurry. Despite its pixel reserves, it also has a hard time with zoom shots. In the test photo, image details blur into a pixel mush at 5x magnification.

The 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera does a decent job. However, you have to get used to the rather gaudy colors and a sharpness that clearly decreases towards the edges of the photo.

Videos with the main, ultra-wide-angle and selfie cameras are electronically stabilized, but are limited to Full HD quality and 30 FPS. This is due to the SoC, because the Snapdragon 695 5G, unlike the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, does not support 4K videos, which were still possible in the Redmi Note 10 Pro.

Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the wide-angle camera
Photo with the wide-angle camera
Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight shot 1Daylight shot 2Ultra wide angle5x zoomLow light shot

We took another close look at the 108 MP camera under controlled lighting conditions. In optimal lighting conditions, the camera reproduces the colors of the ColorChecker reference card very accurately, apart from certain green and brown tones, and also reproduces the test chart sharply. However, nothing can be seen at 1 lux residual light.

ColorChecker
17.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
12 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: 8.16 ∆E min: 1.2 - max: 17.73 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.5 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.4 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
65 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
77.5 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
94.4 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: 47.56 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.37 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty - Protective case and 67 watt power adapter

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G comes with a 67-watt power adapter, a USB cable (type A to C), a SIM tool, a protective case, and a quick-start guide. The manufacturer does not offer special accessories for its smartphone in its online store.

A 24-month warranty is provided for the smartphone in Germany. This may differ from region to region, so be sure to check with your supplier before purchasing.

Input Devices & Operation - Responsive 120 Hz display

Thanks to its refresh rate of 120 Hz, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can be used smoothly and responds very accurately to inputs. However, the high refresh rate has to be enabled in the display settings first, since the default setting is 60 HZ.

The fingerprint sensor of Xiaomi's phone is located in the power button and can easily be reached with the thumb of the right hand and the index and middle fingers of the left hand. Fingerprint unlocking works reliably and very quickly, for the home screen is displayed without any significant delay. 

Authentication via face recognition delivers a similarly high hit rate and speed as the fingerprint sensor. However, Face Unlock is less secure as a pure software solution and also needs sufficient ambient light to work flawlessly.

Keyboard in portait mode
Keyboard in portait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Display - AMOLED panel up to 1000 nits

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a 120 Hz fast AMOLED display. At 2400x1080 (FHD+), it offers the same resolution as the Redmi Note 10 Pro. Because the form factor has not changed either, the pixel density remains at 395 PPI, which guarantees a sharp display. You would need a magnifying glass to look for differences in the image parameters. In principle, this is not a disadvantage since the Redmi Note 10 Pro had already made a very good impression with its display under testing.

Against a white background, the AMOLED panel of the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shines at an average of 686 cd/m². If you repeat the test in a smaller display area (APL18 measurement), the brightness even increases up to 1073 cd/m². Without the brightness sensor, a maximum of 433 cd/m² is possible. The screen still shines at 2.72 cd/m² in the lowest brightness setting.

The AMOLED panel controls its brightness via pulse width modulation. At a screen brightness of 54 percent or lower, the PWM flickering moves in a quite high frequency range of 162.1 to 521.5 Hz. At screen brightness levels higher than 54 percent, this is a constant 120 Hz. However, fluctuations in the amplitude course are much lower in this range (> 54%), so sensitive users should not be bothered by the PWM flickering.

682
cd/m²
671
cd/m²
693
cd/m²
683
cd/m²
675
cd/m²
694
cd/m²
687
cd/m²
687
cd/m²
703
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 703 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 686.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.72 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 675 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
90.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G82 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.59
realme 9 5G
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
Samsung Galaxy A53
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50
Screen
4%
-70%
-136%
-105%
-7%
Brightness middle
675
653
-3%
635
-6%
590
-13%
589
-13%
718
6%
Brightness
686
651
-5%
640
-7%
561
-18%
561
-18%
730
6%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
96
1%
92
-3%
90
-5%
92
-3%
Black Level *
0.38
0.5
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.2
8%
2.96
-128%
5.15
-296%
4.33
-233%
1.62
-25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.9
2.9
26%
7.63
-96%
10.35
-165%
8.39
-115%
4.21
-8%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.8
-6%
4.8
-182%
7.1
-318%
5.9
-247%
2
-18%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.25 98%
2.214 99%
2.143 103%
2.063 107%
2.156 102%
CCT
6591 99%
6426 101%
6970 93%
8540 76%
8021 81%
6545 99%
Contrast
1553
1178

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 521.5 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 521.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 521.5 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Minimum panel brightness
Minimum
25% panel brightness
25%
50% panel brightness
50%
75% panel brightness
75%
Maximum manual panel brightness
100%

Series of measurements at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

In the display settings, you can choose from three presets, namely "Vivid", "Saturated" and "Standard", for the color scheme. In addition, color temperature can be adjusted. The Xiaomi phone delivers the best display under the "Standard" setting. Colors and gray levels are then very close to the reference colors and the other image parameters are also exemplary.

Color fidelity (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color fidelity (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color space (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color space (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Grayscale (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Grayscale (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color saturation (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)
Color saturation (standard color scheme, sRGB target color space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.07 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5775 ms rise
↘ 0.4905 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5205 ms rise
↘ 0.5295 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

Owing to its high luminosity, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is suitable for outdoor use without major restrictions. Display content can be read flawlessly if direct sunlight is avoided. This is also possible from extreme angles without any problems thanks to the AMOLED panel's high viewing-angle stability.

Outdoor use (direct sunlight)
Outdoor use (direct sunlight)
Outdoor use (in the shade)
Outdoor use (in the shade)
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Snapdragon 695 5G ensures solid performance

The Snapdragon 695 5G and its Adreno 619 graphics chip enable solid everyday performance in the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Occasionally you have to put up with small delays, but the overall operation is smooth. The power provided by the SoC is also sufficient for current games.

In terms of system performance, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is no different to other comparison devices equipped with the Snapdragon 695 5G. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro with its Snapdragon 732G is not far behind. 

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
740 Points ∼100% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=266, last 2 years)
737 Points ∼100% +8%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
692 Points ∼94% +1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
687 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
684 Points ∼92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=14)
678 Points ∼92% -1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
671 Points ∼91% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
563 Points ∼76% -18%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 5538, n=266, last 2 years)
2373 Points ∼100% +24%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1998 Points ∼84% +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1946 Points ∼82% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1921 Points ∼81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=14)
1916 Points ∼81% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1914 Points ∼81% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1878 Points ∼79% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1728 Points ∼73% -10%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=160, last 2 years)
584886 Points ∼100% +47%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
409976 Points ∼70% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
409358 Points ∼70% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
399726 Points ∼68% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
398622 Points ∼68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 409358, n=10)
388907 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
352259 Points ∼60% -12%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
11470 Points ∼100% +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
10396 Points ∼91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=214, last 2 years)
10362 Points ∼90% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
9776 Points ∼85% -6%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9363 Points ∼82% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 10834, n=13)
9226 Points ∼80% -11%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7843 Points ∼68% -25%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=97, last 2 years)
775 Points ∼100% +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points ∼77%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
593 Points ∼77% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
579 Points ∼75% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 - 604, n=10)
575 Points ∼74% -4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
552 Points ∼71% -8%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 8753, n=179, last 2 years)
4625 Points ∼100% +27%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3705 Points ∼80% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=11)
3644 Points ∼79% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3638 Points ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3626 Points ∼78% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3596 Points ∼78% -1%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3535 Points ∼76% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
3365 Points ∼73% -8%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=179, last 2 years)
8168 Points ∼100% +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7986 Points ∼98% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7976 Points ∼98% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7836 Points ∼96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8072, n=11)
7748 Points ∼95% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
7157 Points ∼88% -9%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6969 Points ∼85% -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
5972 Points ∼73% -24%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=179, last 2 years)
5204 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4836 Points ∼93% +16%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4366 Points ∼84% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=11)
4329 Points ∼83% +3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4311 Points ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4183 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4043 Points ∼78% -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
3855 Points ∼74% -8%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=179, last 2 years)
8925 Points ∼100% +102%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
5178 Points ∼58% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4426 Points ∼50%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4423 Points ∼50% 0%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4413 Points ∼49% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4166 - 4426, n=11)
4359 Points ∼49% -2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4323 Points ∼48% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4086 Points ∼46% -8%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=179, last 2 years)
1407 Points ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
1228 Points ∼87% +2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
1210 Points ∼86% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1378, n=11)
1208 Points ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1207 Points ∼86%
realme 9 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1163 Points ∼83% -4%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1125 Points ∼80% -7%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼78% -9%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (1043 - 286905, n=156, last 2 years)
51780 Points ∼100% +901%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5265 Points ∼10% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4924 - 5839, n=10)
5173 Points ∼10% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5172 Points ∼10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G, Adreno 618, 6144
4958 Points ∼10% -4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4924 Points ∼10% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
4714 Points ∼9% -9%

As expected, smartphones equipped with the Snapdragon 695 5G do not differ much in the GPU-heavy tests. However, Samsung's Galaxy A53 performs much better with its Exynos 1280 in graphics calculations.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
621 Points ∼100% +77%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
354 Points ∼57% +1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
352 Points ∼57% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points ∼57%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
351 Points ∼57% 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
636 Points ∼100% +76%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
363 Points ∼57% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points ∼57%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points ∼57% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
356 Points ∼56% -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1205 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1204 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1201 Points ∼53% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points ∼53% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1124 Points ∼49% -7%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2293 Points ∼100% +89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1211 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1209 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points ∼53% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1197 Points ∼52% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1143 Points ∼50% -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2898 Points ∼100% +8%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2883 Points ∼99% +8%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2822 Points ∼97% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2773 Points ∼96% +4%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2689 Points ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2676 Points ∼92%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3902 Points ∼100% +43%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2749 Points ∼70% +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2736 Points ∼70% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2721 Points ∼70%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2710 Points ∼69% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2562 Points ∼66% -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3546 Points ∼100% +31%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points ∼78% +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2770 Points ∼78% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2734 Points ∼77% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2711 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2610 Points ∼74% -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3613 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points ∼99% -1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3529 Points ∼98% -2%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3462 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3311 Points ∼92% -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3097 Points ∼86% -14%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3982 Points ∼100% +33%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3008 Points ∼76% +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3001 Points ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2988 Points ∼75%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2973 Points ∼75% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2832 Points ∼71% -5%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3746 Points ∼100% +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3107 Points ∼83%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3104 Points ∼83% 0%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3098 Points ∼83% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3086 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2938 Points ∼78% -5%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3455 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3415 Points ∼99% -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3411 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3375 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2261 Points ∼65% -35%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5172 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4414 Points ∼85% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4360 Points ∼84%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4346 Points ∼84% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4232 Points ∼82% -3%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4156 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4120 Points ∼99%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4096 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4021 Points ∼97% -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4021 Points ∼97% -2%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3621 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2959 Points ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2955 Points ∼82%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2949 Points ∼81% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2917 Points ∼81% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2783 Points ∼77% -6%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3939 Points ∼100% +40%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2837 Points ∼72% +1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2831 Points ∼72% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2819 Points ∼72%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2809 Points ∼71% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2694 Points ∼68% -4%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3554 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3481 Points ∼98% -2%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3455 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3372 Points ∼95% -5%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3370 Points ∼95% -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2823 Points ∼79% -21%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4645 Points ∼100% +10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4286 Points ∼92% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4234 Points ∼91% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4215 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3887 Points ∼84% -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
5510 Points ∼100% +22%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4573 Points ∼83% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4523 Points ∼82%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4496 Points ∼82% -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4038 Points ∼73% -11%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3517 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3515 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3403 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3372 Points ∼96% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2997 Points ∼85% -12%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼74% -26%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼74% -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps ∼99%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps ∼98% -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
92 fps ∼97% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
91 fps ∼96% -3%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
56 fps ∼100% +33%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼77% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼75%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps ∼75% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼71% -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
61 fps ∼100% +30%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼79% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps ∼77%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps ∼77% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps ∼74% -4%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps ∼86%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps ∼86% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps ∼83% -3%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
38 fps ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼92% +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps ∼89%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps ∼89% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps ∼87% -3%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼85%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼85% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼85% 0%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +21%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼87% +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
15 fps ∼100% +25%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps ∼73% -8%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps ∼100% +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps ∼82%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.1 fps ∼81% -1%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.8 fps ∼78% -5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps ∼78% -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.4 fps ∼74% -10%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
23 fps ∼100% +21%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼83% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps ∼78% -5%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps ∼85%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps ∼85% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼81% -5%
realme 9 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼81% -5%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps ∼81% -5%

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G performs well in terms of browser performance. Websites load quickly and are displayed swiftly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (14.8 - 282, n=176, last 2 years)
73.4 Points ∼100% +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
64.223 Points ∼87%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
64.165 Points ∼87% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
63.5 Points ∼87% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 72.3, n=11)
60.2 Points ∼82% -6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
56.647 Points ∼77% -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
49.47 Points ∼67% -23%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 375, n=163, last 2 years)
70.3 runs/min ∼100% +82%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)
51.24 runs/min ∼73% +32%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
47.11 runs/min ∼67% +22%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chome 102)
44.7 runs/min ∼64% +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 47.7, n=9)
43.7 runs/min ∼62% +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
43.2 runs/min ∼61% +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
38.7 runs/min ∼55%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (27 - 292, n=176, last 2 years)
101.9 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
100 Points ∼98%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
96 Points ∼94% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 112, n=9)
89.6 Points ∼88% -10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
75 Points ∼74% -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
71 Points ∼70% -29%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
69 Points ∼68% -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (3905 - 74261, n=196, last 2 years)
26779 Points ∼100% +26%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
24159 Points ∼90% +14%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
22285 Points ∼83% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 27593, n=11)
21915 Points ∼82% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
21468 Points ∼80% +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
21269 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
17293 Points ∼65% -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (Chrome98)
2832 ms * ∼100% -41%
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 12437, n=186, last 2 years)
2582 ms * ∼91% -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)
2013.3 ms * ∼71%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
2009.8 ms * ∼71% -0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1502 - 2501, n=10)
1975 ms * ∼70% +2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)
1922.7 ms * ∼68% +5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)
1920.3 ms * ∼68% +5%

* ... smaller is better

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has better storage performance values than Xiaomi's Redmi Note 10 Pro, although both smartphones have nominally the same storage type in the form of UFS 2.2. But this is hardly noticeable in everyday use because both are virtually equally fast when loading apps. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G gets its nominal advantage mostly from its higher sequential write performance.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 ProMotorola Moto G82 5GOnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5Grealme 9 5GSamsung Galaxy A53Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
-13%
-10%
-46%
5%
3%
23%
Sequential Read 256KB
523
512
-2%
473.4
-9%
509.21
-3%
511
-2%
510.1
-2%
706 ?(303 - 999, n=36)
35%
993 ?(45.6 - 1999, n=257, last 2 years)
90%
Sequential Write 256KB
488.91
268
-45%
445.7
-9%
482.15
-1%
120.6
-75%
486.7
0%
492 ?(105.3 - 884, n=36)
1%
567 ?(11.9 - 1783, n=257, last 2 years)
16%
Random Read 4KB
204.3
146.5
-28%
180.8
-12%
179.02
-12%
88.5
-57%
229.9
13%
175 ?(89.3 - 253, n=36)
-14%
183.3 ?(13.5 - 543, n=257, last 2 years)
-10%
Random Write 4KB
196.38
126.7
-35%
155.5
-21%
147.46
-25%
95.4
-51%
210.8
7%
173.2 ?(113.8 - 258, n=36)
-12%
184.5 ?(18.4 - 503, n=258, last 2 years)
-6%

Games - 120 fps remains the exception

The Xiaomi smartphone is able to demonstrate the strengths of its 120 Hz screen in gaming. However, only a few games are able to utilitze the full 120 fps, since even graphically simpler titles like Armajet cannot achieve more than 80 fps on average. The Snapdragon 695 5G also provides enough power to display PUBG Mobile at a stable 30 fps in HD/high settings.

Gaming frame rates were determined with our Gamebench tool.

Armajet
Armajet
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø77.5 (55-104)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G; PUBG Mobile; 2.1.0: Ø29.9 (27-31)

Emissions - Maximum power always on hand

Temperature

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G remains cool during use. The maximum surface temperature only reaches 34.1 °C after one hour of stress tests. As the 3DMark Wild Life benchmarks show, the Snapdragon 695 5G is always able to output maximum performance even under permanent load.

Max. Load
 34.1 °C
93 F
33.4 °C
92 F
30.8 °C
87 F
 
 34 °C
93 F
32.6 °C
91 F
31 °C
88 F
 
 33.8 °C
93 F
33.9 °C
93 F
30.4 °C
87 F
 
Maximum: 34.1 °C = 93 F
Average: 32.7 °C = 91 F
30.8 °C
87 F
32.2 °C
90 F
32.5 °C
91 F
29.8 °C
86 F
30.6 °C
87 F
33.5 °C
92 F
30.3 °C
87 F
31.8 °C
89 F
32.7 °C
91 F
Maximum: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Average: 31.6 °C = 89 F
Power Supply (max.)  27.5 °C = 82 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Adreno 618, SD 732G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 % ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % ∼100% 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53
Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
97.8 % ∼98% -2%
012345678910111213Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.17)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.18)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø3.81 (3.75-3.84)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.23 (7.21-7.25)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.27)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.21 (7.21-7.23)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.7-13.7)

Speakers

The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has good-sounding stereo speakers that can play relatively loud at 87.6 dB(A). Mids and highs are very well-balanced, whereas low tones are almost completely absent. However, the audio connection does not sound particularly clear or distortionless - the signal-to-noise ratio is only a weak 61.4 dBFS.

Headsets and speakers can be paired with the smartphone via the 3.5 mm jack or Bluetooth 5.1. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports common Bluetooth codecs such as AAC, SBC, LDAC, aptX and aptX HD.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.641.2252930.53127.825.74025.822.65032.528.56322.423.38024.520.610019.43312516.541.916018.448.120012.848.82509.952.231511.354.940013.15650011.466.56301169.480011.670.6100012.374.612501275.9160012.475.5200012.276.625001376.4315012.876.5400013.278.4500013.479.1630013.876.9800013.370.31000013.363.31250013.567.91600013.161.3SPL24.987.6N0.670.6median 13median 69.4Delta0.710.939.633.634.726.824.72823.534.242.443.428.431.423.931.520.43215.333.42046.214.644.313.151.81459.61163.210.3681170.310.273.410.375.810.874.510.977.511.680.812.279.512.28012.577.813.478.513.176.51574.213.873.914.165.11660.624.789.30.677.5median 13.1median 73.4210.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - Fast charge in 51 minutes

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Xiaomi phone is inconspicuous. It is more energy-efficient than most comparison devices at just under 2.8 watts under load.

The 5000 mAh battery can be quickly recharged via the included 67-watt power adapter. We recorded 51 minutes for a full recharge of the smartphone battery from 0 to 100%. After 21 minutes, the battery reaches 50% and after 35 minutes 80%.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.96 / 2.31 / 2.34 Watt
Load midlight 2.88 / 4.88 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
5020 mAh
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A53
5000 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
14%
27%
-13%
9%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
0.96
1.05
-9%
0.9
6%
0.8
17%
0.9
6%
0.83 ?(0.56 - 1.01, n=10)
14%
0.887 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=194, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Average *
2.31
1.8
22%
1.2
48%
1
57%
1.3
44%
1.653 ?(1 - 2.47, n=10)
28%
1.568 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=194, last 2 years)
32%
Idle Maximum *
2.34
1.85
21%
1.4
40%
1.4
40%
1.6
32%
1.814 ?(1.4 - 2.52, n=10)
22%
1.783 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=194, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
2.88
4.2
-46%
3.3
-15%
2.4
17%
5.7
-98%
3.23 ?(2.4 - 4.83, n=10)
-12%
4.36 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=194, last 2 years)
-51%
Load Maximum *
4.88
6.29
-29%
5.2
-7%
4.6
6%
7.3
-50%
5.11 ?(4.47 - 6.5, n=10)
-5%
7.17 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=194, last 2 years)
-47%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.96 (1.151-5.46)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø3.72 (1.423-6.41)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G: Ø2.65 (0.76-4.99)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.70.91.11.31.61.822.22.52.72.93.13.33.6