Notebookcheck Logo

Motorola Moto G82 5G smartphone review: OLED, optical image stabilization and large battery

Also rainproof. The Moto G82 5G is a nice addition to Motorola's portfolio at a typical mid-range price of around EUR 330. Thanks to its strong features, similarly priced smartphones appear less attractive by comparison. But does the Moto G82 play all its cards right?
Motorola Moto G82

The Motorola Moto G82 5G does not have a direct counterpart in Motorola's 2021 portfolio, but it is most likely a successor to the Moto G71. The SoC remains unchanged, so the OIS-equipped camera is the 'new and improved' highlight of the successor. 

The Moto G82 5G falls into the mid-range with a recommended retail price of EUR 329. Meanwhile, there are many other exciting devices that offer sufficent power for everyday use, long runtimes and decent cameras, so let's examine how the Moto G82 performs in comparison.  

Note for international readers: As the Motorola Moto G82 5G was only recently released, availability appears to be sporadic and prices uncertain (see "Price and Availability" at the end of this review for more details).

Motorola Moto G82 5G
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A77) / Silver (Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.60 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 105 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD-Slot (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G, 3G, 4G (1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,13,17,18,19,20,26,28,32,38,39,40,41,42,43,66), 5G (1/2/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/66/77/78,SA,NSA), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 160.9 x 74.5 ( = 0.31 x 6.33 x 2.93 in)
Battery
30 Wh, 5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.2, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 1.020W/​kg (head), 1.780W/​kg (body) , fanless
Weight
173 g ( = 6.1 oz / 0.38 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
329 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.4 %
07/2022
Motorola Moto G82 5G
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
173 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2400x1080
80.5 %
03/2022
realme 9 Pro
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619
195 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2412x1080
83.8 %
03/2022
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4
173 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.43"2400x1080
80.2 %
07/2021
Nokia X10
SD 480, Adreno 619
220 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80.3 %
06/2022
Huawei Nova 9 SE
SD 680, Adreno 610
191 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.78"2388x1080

Case: Plexiglass and IP certification

The Moto smartphone is relatively light and also somewhat more compact than other smartphones in this class, but still probably too big for small hands. The case is made of PMMA, a plastic also known as Plexiglas. It appears very sturdy and can hardly be twisted, but cracks under strongly applied pressure. 

Thanks to the rounded glass edges on the back, the smartphone feels good to use and looks quite modern with its relatively straight sides. But the transition between various surface materials is noticeable when handling the device. Colors come in dark gray or a creamy white, and both are decorated with a delicate dot pattern on the back. Unfortunately, our gray test device proves rather susceptible to fingerprints. 

The Moto G82 5G has an IP52 rating, which translates to protection against dust. However, in terms of protection against liquids, the smartphone is certified as only water resistant (and not waterproof), so it should not be immersed in water.

Motorola Moto G82 5G
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Motorola Moto G82 5G

Size Comparison

169 mm / 6.65 inch 79.7 mm / 3.14 inch 9.1 mm / 0.3583 inch 220 g0.485 lbs164.3 mm / 6.47 inch 75.6 mm / 2.98 inch 8.5 mm / 0.3346 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs164.64 mm / 6.48 inch 75.55 mm / 2.97 inch 7.94 mm / 0.3126 inch 191 g0.4211 lbs160.9 mm / 6.33 inch 74.5 mm / 2.93 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs160 mm / 6.3 inch 73 mm / 2.87 inch 7 mm / 0.2756 inch 173 g0.3814 lbs

Equipment: 3.5 mm audio port included

With 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of mass storage, the Moto G82 5G cuts a good figure in its class. The OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G offers 2 GB more RAM, but this is unlikely to make a huge difference in practice. Bluetooth 5.1 and NFC for contactless payment services are also included.

Nostalgics will be happy about the 3.5 mm audio port that allows for the direct connection of analog headphones or speakers.

Bottom: 3.5mm audio port, microphone, USB-C port, speakers
Bottom: 3.5mm audio port, microphone, USB-C port, speakers
Top: microphone
Top: microphone
Right: standby button, volume rocker
Right: standby button, volume rocker
Left: SIM slot
Left: SIM slot

microSD Card Reader

The card reader can handle micro-SD cards up to 1 TB. However, in order to use this feature, users have to give up one of the two SIM slots. 

Under testing with our Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD reference card, speeds prove to be average.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
31.6 MB/s ∼100% +15%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s ∼94% +8%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
27.5 MB/s ∼87%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash (Angelbird V60)
16.1 MB/s ∼51% -41%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.1 (23.8-41.8)
realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37 (24.8-48)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.1 (25.1-49.3)
Nokia X10 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø24.2 (12.5-37.3)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76.2 (38-84.1)
realme 9 Pro Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.9 (17.6-80.6)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78 (32.1-84.2)
Nokia X10 Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø73.7 (30-82.9)

Software: Only occasional updates

Android 12 serves as the basis for Motorola's MyUX, which hardly differs from the stock Android. All extensions, such as gesture control or design settings, are pooled in the Moto app.

At the beginning of our review process, the security patches were from March 2022 and thus in urgent need of an update. Towards the end of the review, we received an update (June 2022), which shows that you should only expect an update every 3 months. In total, Motorola only offers 3 years of security updates for its smartphones. In terms of system updates, two major Android updates are promised, but other providers, such as Nokia or Samsung, now offer much more. 

DRM-L1 certification is provided, so HD streaming is possible in apps like Netflix and the like.

Software - Motorola Moto G82 5G
Software - Motorola Moto G82 5G
Software - Motorola Moto G82 5G

Communication & GNSS: Usable in many countries

The Moto G82 offers Wi-Fi 5 as the fastest Wi-Fi standard. Under testing with our Asus ROG AXE11000 reference router, the smartphone achieves decent transfer rates, but the OnePlus Nord CE 2 is significantly faster overall. Transfer rates are very stable both when sending and receiving.

Of course, 5G (the latest mobile standard) is installed, and 5G standalone can also be used. Many 4G frequencies are available, so the phone can be used for mobile internet access in large number of countries.

During our review, we also randomly tested the reception quality of the smartphone and compared it with various high-end phones from our database. Indeed, the Moto G82 has strong reception, even indoors.

Networking
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
342 (min: 321) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
364 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼56%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
333 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼56%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
417 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
498 (min: 463) MBit/s ∼77%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
323 (min: 289) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AX12
332 (min: 318) MBit/s ∼72%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
307 (min: 299) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
366 (min: 351) MBit/s ∼57%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
615 (min: 44.3) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
645 (min: 61.4) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AX12
483 (min: 5.59) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
464 (min: 15.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360380Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (321-351)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (349-382)
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

Outdoors, it takes a moment before the location is pinpointed with an accuracy of 4 meters. The variety of available satellites is sufficient, but there are other smartphones with more connections.

For real world testing, we went for a bike ride and took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch for comparison.

The Moto G82's tracking is not so precise: even in less problematic areas with lots of open space, the route is not accurately tracked and the smartphone partly places us in the water when we cross a bridge. Users who value accurate localization should thus look elsewhere.

Motorola Moto G82 positioning – overview
Motorola Moto G82 positioning – overview
Motorola Moto G82 positioning – loop
Motorola Moto G82 positioning – loop
Motorola Moto G82 positioning – bridge
Motorola Moto G82 positioning – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – overview
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – overview
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – loop
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – loop
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – bridge
Garmin Venu 2 positioning – bridge

Telephony & Voice Quality: Only moderately clear conversations

Here, Google's phone app is used, which is tidily designed and is also used by many other manufacturers, so adjustment to the use of the Moto G82 should be unproblematic.

It is advisable to use the earpiece than the inbuilt loudspeaker when making calls: The earpiece sounds quite clear and the microphone picks up our voice quite clearly, as long as you speak fairly loudly. You should also not speak too quietly when making calls via the hands-free module and the loudspeaker, otherwise the receiver will not hear anything. Moreover, the loudspeaker also sounds very muffled and reproduces sound with audible noise at maximum volume.

Cameras: OIS for the main camera on the Moto G82

Photo with the main camera
Photo with the main camera

Features that are typical for the price range of the Moto G82 are a 50-megapixel main camera, Full HD video recording, as well as a wide-angle and a macro lens. Our review sample has all these and more: The main camera offers additional protection against shaking via optical image stabilization - a nice feature that is otherwise hard to get for so little money.

The main camera of the Moto G82 usually doesn't take pictures in full resolution, but uses only a quarter, making pixels larger and more light-sensitive. Image sharpness is at a medium level and a slight blooming is visible in very bright areas. Unfortunately, the camera system only offers basic lighting in very low light and high contrast environments. The realme 9 Pro, for example, does better here.

The wide-angle camera lacks detail and clearly loses sharpness towards the edges, but is still suitable for snapshots. The selfie camera at the front has a resolution of 16 MP and provides enough detail for enlarging images. 

Videos can be recorded in Full HD with 60 fps at most. The OnePlus Nord CE 2, by comparison, offers 4K recordings. Autofocus and brightness adjustment react a bit sluggishly from time to time, and images can become grainy in dark areas. The video function can be used for short recordings, but there are better quality cameras in this price range.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low LightWeitwinkelkamera
click to load images

In laboratory testing, the camera produces average sharpnesss and has problems with some color transitions, but the contrast is satisfactory.

ColorChecker
23 ∆E
14 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
25 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
19 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G82 5G: 15.04 ∆E min: 3.47 - max: 24.98 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.4 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
53.4 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
73.8 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
42.2 ∆E
85.7 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G82 5G: 46.42 ∆E min: 13.95 - max: 85.68 ∆E

Accessories & Warranty: Buying accessories is difficult

Upon purchase, buyers receive a charger, a USB cable, a SIM tool and a silicone bumper.

Motorola's online accessories store is less well-stocked and mainly offers accessories for older devices. We were unable to find any accessories for the Moto G82 in its German store.

The manufacturer offers a 24-month warranty for its smartphone in Germany. This may vary from country to country, so be sure to check with your supplier before purchasing. 

Input Devices & Operation: Fingerprint sensor somewhat slow

The 120 HZ display functions smoothly in use and also reacts very sensitively to input in the peripheral areas.

The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the standby button on the right side of the case, which is easy to reach with the right thumb or the index finger of the left hand and recognizes the imprint very reliably. However, there is a one-second delay until the homescreen is displayed after unlocking.

Unlocking via facial recognition is also possible, but not quite as secure due to the use of a purely software solution.

Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Display: Motorola offers an OLED for little money

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
DC dimming
DC dimming

The OLED screen of the Moto G82 5G can get quite bright. It does not come close to high-end smartphones in terms of brightness, but it is among the best in its price range with an average of 640 nits. The slightly expanded Full HD resolution is also class standard.

We observed the typical PWM flickering, but Motorola has integrated a DC dimming mode in its software (i.e. in the display settings), as an option called "Flicker prevention". This adjusts the flickering uniformly to the refresh rate, thereby remedying the issue and preventing a nuisance for many users. However, colors can also become distorted at low brightness.

632
cd/m²
633
cd/m²
645
cd/m²
630
cd/m²
635
cd/m²
653
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
640
cd/m²
657
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 657 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 639.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 635 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.96 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3
ΔE Greyscale 4.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
95.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.214
Motorola Moto G82 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
realme 9 Pro
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.60
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Nokia X10
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Huawei Nova 9 SE
LCD, 2388x1080, 6.78
Screen
-20%
-1%
-1%
36%
Brightness middle
635
541
-15%
601
-5%
674
6%
546
-14%
Brightness
640
541
-15%
596
-7%
630
-2%
523
-18%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
98
2%
83
-14%
93
-3%
Black Level *
0.44
0.78
0.75
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.96
4.42
-49%
3.35
-13%
3.39
-15%
0.6
80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.63
8.77
-15%
6.72
12%
6.95
9%
1
87%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.8
6
-25%
4.6
4%
4.4
8%
0.8
83%
Gamma
2.214 99%
2.074 106%
2.363 93%
2.175 101%
2.25 98%
CCT
6970 93%
8049 81%
7372 88%
8301 78%
6540 99%
Contrast
1230
864
728

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119.4 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19947 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM flickering
PWM flickering
100% brightness
100% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
0% brightness
0% brightness

Messreihe mit fixer Zoomstufe und unterschiedlichen Helligkeitseinstellungen

In our measurements with the spectrophotometer and the CalMAN software, red is clearly underrepresented in the "natural" color profile. The picture thus appears cool and some color values deviate quite strongly from the optimum. Those wanting the most accurate color reproduction possible should preferably look elsewhere.

On the other hand, the OLED screen ensures (in theory) a complete representation of black, since individual pixels can simply be switched off, so that the contrast looks quite good and the colors are bright.

CalMAN grayscale - color profile: natural
CalMAN grayscale - color profile: natural
CalMAN color accuracy - color profile: natural
CalMAN color accuracy - color profile: natural
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Motorola's Moto G82 performs quite well outdoors on bright, slightly cloudy days. However, you should switch to the shade in direct sunlight due to the strong reflections on the display.

As is typical for OLEDs, the viewing angles are very good even when viewed from extreme angles. We observed only very slight shifts in brightness at most.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance: Typical middle-class power

Using a Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 as the SoC, the Moto G82 5G cuts a decent figure among similarly priced mid-range phones in terms of performance. Again, the OnePlus Nord CE 2 with its MediaTek Dimensity 900 is slightly faster, but the differences are unlikely to be noticeable in everyday use. 

Overall, the performance of the Moto smartphone should be sufficient for the vast majority of apps currently available. However, performance reserves are limited, as you'll quickly notice when multitasking, for example.

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
747 Points ∼100% +11%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
697 Points ∼93% +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=267, last 2 years)
689 Points ∼92% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=9)
682 Points ∼91% +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
671 Points ∼90%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
508 Points ∼68% -24%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points ∼51% -43%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=267, last 2 years)
2236 Points ∼100% +15%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
2182 Points ∼98% +12%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2016 Points ∼90% +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1946 Points ∼87%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=9)
1909 Points ∼85% -2%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1687 Points ∼75% -13%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1661 Points ∼74% -15%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1119358, n=127, last 2 years)
558922 Points ∼100% +37%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
432909 Points ∼77% +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
409358 Points ∼73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (379222 - 409358, n=6)
391734 Points ∼70% -4%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
324606 Points ∼58% -21%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 18567, n=174, last 2 years)
10245 Points ∼100% +31%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9585 Points ∼94% +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (7569 - 10834, n=8)
9492 Points ∼93% +21%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
8055 Points ∼79% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7843 Points ∼77%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6928 Points ∼68% -12%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6687 Points ∼65% -15%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1169, n=68, last 2 years)
738 Points ∼100% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (552 - 604, n=6)
584 Points ∼79% +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
552 Points ∼75%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1223 - 8753, n=174, last 2 years)
4379 Points ∼100% +18%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3932 Points ∼90% +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3705 Points ∼85%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3535 - 3848, n=7)
3683 Points ∼84% -1%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3228 Points ∼74% -13%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2575 Points ∼59% -30%
System
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7986 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6969 - 8059, n=7)
7767 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=174, last 2 years)
7749 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
6854 Points ∼86% -14%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
6298 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
5667 Points ∼71% -29%
Memory
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
5383 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 9044, n=174, last 2 years)
5008 Points ∼93% +4%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4836 Points ∼90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4092 - 4836, n=7)
4438 Points ∼82% -8%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3575 Points ∼66% -26%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3424 Points ∼64% -29%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 26660, n=174, last 2 years)
7869 Points ∼100% +78%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4423 Points ∼56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4295 - 4426, n=7)
4372 Points ∼56% -1%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
3994 Points ∼51% -10%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3843 Points ∼49% -13%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2123 Points ∼27% -52%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (718 - 2392, n=174, last 2 years)
1396 Points ∼100% +27%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
1392 Points ∼100% +26%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1254 Points ∼90% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1103 - 1334, n=7)
1218 Points ∼87% +10%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1103 Points ∼79%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1067 Points ∼76% -3%
AImark - Score v2.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 286905, n=146, last 2 years)
55270 Points ∼100% +1022%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 8192
40983 Points ∼74% +732%
realme 9 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
5287 Points ∼10% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (4924 - 5839, n=7)
5221 Points ∼9% +6%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4924 Points ∼9%
Nokia X10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4707 Points ∼9% -4%

Qualcomm's Adreno 619 is the graphics unit of choice for the Moto G82 5G. Our review sample is also on par with the competition here, but the OnePlus Nord CE 2 offers a little more power.

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
578 Points ∼100% +63%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
354 Points ∼61%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
353 Points ∼61% 0%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
284 Points ∼49% -20%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 Points ∼21% -65%
Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
598 Points ∼100% +65%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
363 Points ∼61%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
360 Points ∼60% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
292 Points ∼49% -20%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
125 Points ∼21% -66%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
125 Points ∼21% -66%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2022 Points ∼100% +68%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1204 Points ∼60%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1199 Points ∼59% 0%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
978 Points ∼48% -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
442 Points ∼22% -63%
Wild Life Score
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2037 Points ∼100% +68%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1209 Points ∼59% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
1209 Points ∼59%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
980 Points ∼48% -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
453 Points ∼22% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points ∼100% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2898 Points ∼97%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2620 Points ∼88% -10%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2540 Points ∼85% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3984 Points ∼100% +46%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2736 Points ∼69%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2193 Points ∼55% -20%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1120 Points ∼28% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3627 Points ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2770 Points ∼76%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2275 Points ∼63% -18%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1279 Points ∼35% -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3529 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3520 Points ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3273 Points ∼93% -7%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3098 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2853 Points ∼81% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4028 Points ∼100% +34%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3001 Points ∼75%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2980 Points ∼74% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2441 Points ∼61% -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1190 Points ∼30% -60%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3874 Points ∼100% +25%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3104 Points ∼80%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3085 Points ∼80% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2562 Points ∼66% -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1367 Points ∼35% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3415 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3411 Points ∼100% 0%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2994 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2837 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2824 Points ∼83% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5783 Points ∼100% +31%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4414 Points ∼76%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4316 Points ∼75% -2%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3683 Points ∼64% -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1988 Points ∼34% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4783 Points ∼100% +15%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4156 Points ∼87%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4076 Points ∼85% -2%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3504 Points ∼73% -16%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2128 Points ∼44% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3647 Points ∼100% +23%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2959 Points ∼81%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2930 Points ∼80% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2428 Points ∼67% -18%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1343 Points ∼37% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3998 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2837 Points ∼71%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2817 Points ∼70% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2299 Points ∼58% -19%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1168 Points ∼29% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3481 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3410 Points ∼98% -2%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3020 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2893 Points ∼83% -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2817 Points ∼81% -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5099 Points ∼100% +19%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4286 Points ∼84%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4237 Points ∼83% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3645 Points ∼71% -15%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2185 Points ∼43% -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6041 Points ∼100% +32%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4573 Points ∼76%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4528 Points ∼75% -1%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3842 Points ∼64% -16%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2046 Points ∼34% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3515 Points ∼100%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3458 Points ∼98% -2%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3293 Points ∼94% -6%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3092 Points ∼88% -12%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2866 Points ∼82% -18%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼100% 0%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps ∼100%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps ∼98% -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97 fps ∼100% +2%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
95 fps ∼98% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
95 fps ∼98%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps ∼84% -15%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps ∼100% +21%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps ∼83% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
43 fps ∼83%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼67% -19%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps ∼100% +29%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps ∼77% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
48 fps ∼77%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps ∼66% -15%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps ∼100% +23%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps ∼84% +3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
30 fps ∼81%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps ∼70% -13%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps ∼100% +14%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps ∼88% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
35 fps ∼88%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps ∼73% -17%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼100% +24%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps ∼81% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
17 fps ∼81%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps ∼67% -18%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps ∼100% +20%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps ∼83% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
20 fps ∼83%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼67% -20%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps ∼100% +25%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps ∼80% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
12 fps ∼80%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
9.9 fps ∼66% -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4.8 fps ∼32% -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps ∼100% +28%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.9 fps ∼79% +1%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
7.8 fps ∼78%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.5 fps ∼65% -17%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.3 fps ∼33% -58%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps ∼100% +26%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps ∼79% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
19 fps ∼79%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps ∼67% -16%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps ∼34% -57%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps ∼100% +29%
realme 9 Pro
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps ∼78% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps ∼78%
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps ∼67% -14%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.7 fps ∼36% -54%

Our review device performs quite well in terms of web browsing. Websites are loaded quickly, while photos take a short moment to load every now and then.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 182.6, n=174, last 2 years)
65.2 Points ∼100% +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 64.5, n=7)
57.8 Points ∼89% +2%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
56.647 Points ∼87%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Chrome 99)
54.5 Points ∼84% -4%
realme 9 Pro (Chrome 99)
48.6 Points ∼75% -14%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
44.05 Points ∼68% -22%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (12.5 - 244, n=161, last 2 years)
63.5 runs/min ∼100% +42%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Chrome 99)
52.3 runs/min ∼82% +17%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chome 102)
44.7 runs/min ∼70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 47.1, n=6)
43.1 runs/min ∼68% -4%
realme 9 Pro (Chome 99)
41 runs/min ∼65% -8%
Nokia X10 (Chome 91)
38.06 runs/min ∼60% -15%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 265, n=182, last 2 years)
95.2 Points ∼100% +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 112, n=6)
94.2 Points ∼99% +26%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
75 Points ∼79%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Chrome 99)
69 Points ∼72% -8%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
67 Points ∼70% -11%
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Chrome 99)
28373 Points ∼100% +32%
Average of class Smartphone (3526 - 65969, n=189, last 2 years)
24619 Points ∼87% +15%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
21468 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 22938, n=6)
21185 Points ∼75% -1%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
15636 Points ∼55% -27%
Huawei Nova 9 SE (Huawei Browser 12)
10729 Points ∼38% -50%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 14832, n=187, last 2 years)
2899 ms * ∼100% -44%
Nokia X10 (Chrome 91)
2699 ms * ∼93% -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1923 - 2501, n=6)
2068 ms * ∼71% -3%
Motorola Moto G82 5G (Chrome 102)
2009.8 ms * ∼69%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G (Chrome 99)
1727 ms * ∼60% +14%

* ... smaller is better

The internal UFS storage is not the fastest for this price range, but fast enough for everyday use. Load times and speeds for data transfers are on a medium level.

Motorola Moto G82 5Grealme 9 ProOnePlus Nord CE 2 5GNokia X10Huawei Nova 9 SEAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
70%
-1%
47%
-1%
29%
Sequential Read 256KB
473.4
494
4%
999
111%
498.6
5%
973.13
106%
775 ?(427 - 1011, n=102)
64%
943 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=258, last 2 years)
99%
Sequential Write 256KB
445.7
105.3
-76%
857
92%
455
2%
714.41
60%
290 ?(13.6 - 719, n=102)
-35%
502 ?(11.9 - 1485, n=258, last 2 years)
13%
Random Read 4KB
180.8
148.3
-18%
253.4
40%
170.6
-6%
154.28
-15%
150.4 ?(92.6 - 239, n=102)
-17%
170.9 ?(13.5 - 345, n=258, last 2 years)
-5%
Random Write 4KB
155.5
120.4
-23%
212.9
37%
145.4
-6%
211.27
36%
129.8 ?(18.2 - 290, n=102)
-17%
167.4 ?(30.3 - 475, n=259, last 2 years)
8%

Gaming: 120 fps should not be expected

Our review sample was unable to utilize the full 120 Hz of its screen in our gaming tests, but we registered a stable 60 fps in fast 2D games such as Armajet. If you prefer to play shooters like PUBG Mobile and want high frame rates, the maximum of 40 fps in low settings is unlikely to suffice. We determined the frame rates using the GameBench tool.

Motorola offers its own gaming overlay called GameTime, which allows you to turn off annoying notifications while gaming, disable automatic brightness adjustment, and use many other helpful tools.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet
Armajet
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.8 (59-60)
; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.0.0: Ø39.7 (38-41)
; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.0.0: Ø29.8 (28-31)

Emissions: No throttling under load

Temperature

Maximum temperatures during high load are at the usual level. Accordingly, the Moto G82 may become uncomfortably warm in high ambient temperatures.

In everyday use, the smartphone runs stably and without performance losses even during prolonged load, as evidenced by the 3DMark stress tests.

Max. Load
 40.7 °C
105 F
36.8 °C
98 F
33.8 °C
93 F
 
 39.9 °C
104 F
36 °C
97 F
34.1 °C
93 F
 
 39.9 °C
104 F
36.5 °C
98 F
34.3 °C
94 F
 
Maximum: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Average: 36.9 °C = 98 F
32.8 °C
91 F
36.1 °C
97 F
41.7 °C
107 F
33.2 °C
92 F
37.2 °C
99 F
42 °C
108 F
33.8 °C
93 F
37.2 °C
99 F
41.7 °C
107 F
Maximum: 42 °C = 108 F
Average: 37.3 °C = 99 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21.6 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 (978min) % ∼100% 0%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 (2.68min) % ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 (12.2min) % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 (7.23min) % ∼100%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nokia X10
Adreno 619, SD 480, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 (290min) % ∼100% 0%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 (3.54min) % ∼100% 0%
Motorola Moto G82 5G
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 (2.16min) % ∼100%
Huawei Nova 9 SE
Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.9 (0.73min) % ∼97% -2%
0123456789101112Tooltip
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.18)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø3.55 (3.54-3.56)
Huawei Nova 9 SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø0.743 (0.73-0.754)
Motorola Moto G82 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.24 (7.23-7.27)
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø12.2 (12.2-12.2)
Huawei Nova 9 SE Adreno 610, SD 680, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø2.69 (2.68-2.69)
Heat distribution front
Heat distribution front
Heat distribution back
Heat distribution back

Speakers

Although Motorola specifies that stereo speakers are installed in the Moto G82 5G, the upper speaker is actually the earpiece. This is not nearly as loud as the actual speaker, so the stereo effect is not as pronounced. In general, the sound quality is quite good, and the speakers do not sound distorted even at maximum volume. Lastly, the speakers don't sound as muffled during music as during calls.

A nice aspect is the 3.5 mm jack. Those who already have wireless headphones can use a variety of current codecs via Bluetooth, including aptX TWS+ and LHDC v3.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.643.32534.837.63132.633.24037.132.25042.836.86332.726.68022.922.210020.224.212517.931.416015.941.12001244.72501146.931513.450.54001156.950012.664.963012.568.780011.867.8100011.472.4125011.573.5160010.572.720009.971.9250010.671.6315011.972.2400012.873.3500013.970.1630014.462.5800015.266100001669.41250015.964.21600016.658.1SPL25.382.9N0.654.3median 12.6median 66Delta210.637.444.72847.132.644.927.742.63446.62748.723.65222.350.917.750.516.15312.853.913.1571258.5961.2116410.767.710.371.710.97312.173.211.874.4127711.879.711.985.212.987.313.387.213.482.813.580.513.679.514.877.814.169.724.6940.692.7median 12.8median 731.19.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G82 5GHuawei Nova 9 SE
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G82 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Huawei Nova 9 SE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (94 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery life: Large battery with good staying power

Power Consumption

The power consumption behavior of the Moto G82 is rather normal for a smartphone in its price range, and the slightly larger screen doesn't seem to cause any increase in consumption either. 

The smartphone can be charged with a maximum of 30 watts, which is supplied by the included power adapter. Total charging times amount to around 1 hour. If you have less time, 10 minutes of charging will bring you a few hours of use. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.2 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 3.3 / 5.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Motorola Moto G82 5G
5000 mAh
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G
4500 mAh
Nokia X10
4470 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-15%
-23%
-11%
-29%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
0.9
-0%
0.8
11%
0.82 ?(0.56 - 1.01, n=6)
9%
0.893 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=196, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Average *
1.2
1.3
-8%
1.7
-42%
1.715 ?(1 - 2.47, n=6)
-43%
1.647 ?(0.65 - 3.6, n=196, last 2 years)
-37%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.6
-14%
1.9
-36%
1.842 ?(1.4 - 2.52, n=6)
-32%
1.86 ?(0.69 - 3.7, n=196, last 2 years)
-33%
Load Average *
3.3
4.5
-36%
4.5
-36%
3.18 ?(2.4 - 4.83, n=6)
4%
4.41 ?(2.1 - 7.74, n=196, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Maximum *
5.2
6.2
-19%
5.9
-13%
4.96 ?(4.47 - 5.68, n=6)
5%
7.26 ?(3.56 - 11.9, n=196, last 2 years)
-40%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
: Ø3.72 (1.423-6.41)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.811.31.51.71.92.12.32.52.72.93.13.43.63.84Tooltip
; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.55 (3.3-4.19)
; Idle 1min: Ø1.044 (0.931-1.229)

Battery Life

The 5,000 mAh battery of the Motorola Moto G82 packs a punch compared to other smartphones in this price range. Interestingly, the Moto G82 still remains a fairly light smartphone despite the large battery.

We recorded superb battery runtimes of 17 hours in our Wi-Fi tests. Users can thus reasonably expect two workdays of normal use. Overall, the Moto smartphone offers very good, but not record-breaking stamina.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 56min
WiFi Websurfing
17h 02min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 58min
Battery Runtime
Reader / Idle (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G82 5G, 5000 mAh
2456 min ∼101%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, 4500 mAh
1873 min ∼77%
Nokia X10, 4470 mAh
2435 min ∼100%
H.264 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G82 5G, 5000 mAh
1245 min ∼127%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, 4500 mAh
1402 min ∼144%
Nokia X10, 4470 mAh
977 min ∼100%
WiFi v1.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G82 5G, 5000 mAh
1022 min ∼129%
realme 9 Pro, 5000 mAh
1047 min ∼132%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, 4500 mAh
962 min ∼121%
Nokia X10, 4470 mAh
896 min ∼113%
Huawei Nova 9 SE, 4000 mAh
795 min ∼100%
Load (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G82 5G, 5000 mAh
298 min ∼100%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G, 4500 mAh
255 min ∼86%
Nokia X10, 4470 mAh
297 min ∼100%

Legend

 
Motorola Moto G82 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
realme 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
OnePlus Nord CE 2 5G MediaTek Dimensity 900, ARM Mali-G68 MP4, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Nokia X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei Nova 9 SE Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

Pros

+ bright OLED screen
+ DC dimming
+ OIS for the main camera
+ lots of LTE frequencies
+ DRM and IP certification
+ many Bluetooth codecs
+ long battery life
+ relatively light

Cons

- screen only moderately color accurate
- location not always accurate
- phonecalls over loudspeaker muffled
- short update promise...
- ... and rare security patches

Verdict: The devil is in the detail

Review: Motorola Moto G82. Review device provided by Motorola Germany.
Review: Motorola Moto G82. Review device provided by Motorola Germany.

With the Moto G82 5G, Motorola brings a solid mid-range phone onto the market that looks rather plain at first sight. But it does stand out from the competition in several details: Hardly any other smartphone in this price range offers optical image stabilization for the main camera. Moreover, lots of Bluetooth codecs are available for top quality sound on wireless headphones or speakers.

The case looks sleek and is even protected against dust and splashes of water. The many 4G frequencies make worldwide use conceivable and the signal quality in the mobile network is good. The display is bright, equipped with DC dimming, and the touchscreen is reliable in use.

However, Motorola's Moto G82 5G is not completely free from points of criticism. For example, it falls short in regard to software updates both in terms of frequency and duration; the competition has gained a lot of ground here in the past year. In addition, the call quality is rather poor and it is difficult to determine how well the display is protected due to the lack of Gorilla Glass.

Overall, the Moto G82 is a solid mid-range phone with a long battery life and OLED screen at a low price.

Those looking for even more performance and a smartphone with 4K video recording are better off with the OnePlus Nord CE 2. Longer software updates and longevity can be found in the Nokia X10.

Price and Availability

As stated at the beginning of this review, the Motorola Moto G82 5G was only recently released, so availability still remains sporadic. Buyers are thus advised to check directly on Motorola's website via their location, a list of which can be accessed here. After clicking on your country of purchase, simply type Moto G82 5G in the search bar. We found, for example, that the smartphone is already available in the UK, India, Brazil and Malaysia (this list is not exhaustive).

Motorola Moto G82 5G - 07/01/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
86%
Games Performance
34 / 64 → 53%
Application Performance
71 / 86 → 83%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
60 / 90 → 67%
Camera
62%
Average
75%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 5 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Motorola Moto G82 5G smartphone review: OLED, optical image stabilization and large battery
Florian Schmitt, 2022-07- 2 (Update: 2022-07- 5)