realme 9 5G review - Fast and affordable smartphone with 5G
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme 9 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 191 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
80.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Realme 9 Pro SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
80.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2021 | Realme 8 5G Dimensity 700, Mali-G57 MP2 | 185 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
80.6 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Motorola Moto G41 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 178 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy M32 Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 180 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 |
Case and equipment - More expensive than the predecessor
Realme's mid-range series is growing and now offers a total of 5 models with the models realme 9 and realme 9 5G, which cover the price range from 200 to 400 Euros.
The realme 9 5G, which we want to take a closer look at in this review, is exactly in the middle and stays well below 300 Euros (~$260) in both configuration variants with 4 GB working memory and 64 GB (~$280) or 128 GB mass storage (~$280). However, this also makes the smartphone considerably more expensive than the predecessor realme 8 5G, which was still available for less than 200 Euros.
For the plastic back, realme was inspired by dunes and designed it with a special coating that refracts the light and resembles lines in the desert sand. This looks very chic on our white test device. The back also has a pearl effect and refracts light in many colors. Fingerprints are not a major problem on this bright variant. Black is available as a second color option.
The casing's stability is normal, but pressure on the front quickly gets through to the liquid crystal display and the smartphone can also be twisted and then creaks quietly.
NFC is on board, as is Bluetooth 5.1. The SD card reader has to share a slot with the second SIM card, so you have to decide what you want to use. The card reader achieves quite good scores in the benchmarks with our reference microSD card Angelbird V60.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Realme 9 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme 9 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto G41 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Communication, software and operation - 5G as a special feature in the price segment
The realme 8 5G already offered WiFi 5, and nothing has changed in the successor. The speeds in our test with the reference router Asus GT-AXE11000 are also quite similar and on the usual level for the price range. The transmission is quite stable according to our test.
What has changed compared to the last generation, however, is the availability of more 4G frequencies, so you are even more flexible when traveling. 5G is on board again, as the name suggests. During our test period, we check the reception quality every now and then compared to high-end smartphones in the same place. The realme 9 5G does not do badly here and at times can offer similarly strong signal quality as higher-end phones.
Android 12 and the overlying realme UI 3.0 are preinstalled, the security patches are from March 2022 at the time of testing and should thus be updated once again.
The fingerprint sensor in the standby button on the casing's right unlocks the phone almost immediately when you put your finger on it. There are occasional problems when recognizing the finger, but overall the sensor works reliably. Face recognition is also possible, but only as a software solution via the front-facing camera and thus not as secure as hardware-based recognition.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Motorola Moto G41 | |
Realme 9 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Realme 9 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Motorola Moto G41 |
Cameras - No wide-angle lens
This shows a clear difference to the realme 9 Pro - the realme 9 5G does not have an ultra-wide-angle lens next to the main camera. Instead, there is a macro lens and a ToF camera that supports portrait shots and does not take photos itself.
The Samsung Isocell JN1 is used as the sensor for the main camera. It offers a resolution of 50 megapixels, but usually only uses a quarter, i.e. 12.5 megapixels, for pictures with a higher light yield. The pictures are decently exposed but lack details and there is also room for improvement in terms of sharpness.
Videos can be recorded in a maximum of 1080p and 30 fps; 60 fps is also possible in 720p. It is pleasing that the autofocus works quite precisely and without visible pulsing. Likewise, the exposure is adjusted quickly.
The front-facing camera has a resolution of 16 megapixels and takes usable selfies in good light. However, you should not enlarge it too much or details will be lost quickly.
The camera equipment is overall similar to that of the realme 8 5G and is typical for the price range. However, an additional wide-angle lens for more flexibility is also possible for little money, for example on the Samsung Galaxy M32.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light

Display - IPS screen with Full HD in the realme phone
The Full HD display of the realme 9 5G is based on IPS technology. There are also phones with an AMOLED screen in this price range, such as the Galaxy M32 or the Moto G41 but in both cases without 5G support.
It is nice that realme provides a panel with 120 Hz support so that movements look smoother and the operation feels more responsive.
In terms of brightness, the screen performs well, but cannot quite keep up with AMOLED screens. In the more detailed measurements with the software CalMAN, we ascertain quite similar readings as in the realme 9 Pro so we can assume that it is the same panel.
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 589 cd/m²
Contrast: 1178:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
97.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.063
Realme 9 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Realme 9 Pro IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Realme 8 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G41 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy M32 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 6% | 10% | 74% | 68% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 42 12% | 33 ? 31% | 9 ? 81% | 10 ? 79% |
Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 18 -0% | 20 ? -11% | 6 ? 67% | 8 ? 56% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 | 362.3 ? | |||
Screen | 0% | -5% | 39% | 36% | |
Brightness middle | 589 | 541 -8% | 576 -2% | 713 21% | 712 21% |
Brightness | 561 | 541 -4% | 550 -2% | 712 27% | 720 28% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 96 7% | 91 1% | 91 1% | 95 6% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.44 12% | 0.7 -40% | ||
Contrast | 1178 | 1230 4% | 823 -30% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.33 | 4.42 -2% | 3.58 17% | 1.1 75% | 1.94 55% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.39 | 8.77 -5% | 6.95 17% | 2.39 72% | 5.81 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 6 -2% | 5.7 3% | 3.7 37% | 1.5 75% |
Gamma | 2.063 107% | 2.074 106% | 2.141 103% | 2.264 97% | 2.089 105% |
CCT | 8021 81% | 8049 81% | 7922 82% | 7373 88% | 6593 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
1% | 3% /
-2% | 57% /
48% | 52% /
44% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8556 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance, emissions and battery life - A lot of power in an inexpensive phone
In terms of performance, the realme 9 5G and the realme 9 Pro are both on par. No wonder, since both use the same SoC, the Snapdragon 695 from Qualcomm. Thus, they offer considerably more power than other smartphones in the price range and enable smooth operation. Users who switch from a high-end smartphone to the realme 9 5G might notice a slight delay here and there, but the overall performance is easily sufficient for everyday use and for averagely demanding games.
However, the realme 9 5G is a bit slower than the predecessor in terms of memory, which seems to be due to the SoC, since the realme 9 Pro has to live with the same limitation.
The heating is on a normal level and could at most become unpleasant only in very high ambient temperatures.
The mono speaker on the casing's lower edge emphasizes trebles very strongly and is thus a bit unpleasant for our ears at high volumes. Better sound can be achieved with external speakers or headphones, which can be connected via Bluetooth and all currently important codecs. A 3.5 mm port is also available if you still have classic wired headphones.
Like the predecessor, our test device has a charging technology with 18 watts and thus recharges in about 1:45 hours when the battery is completely empty. The 5,000 mAh battery enables runtimes of over 17 hours in our WLAN test, which should easily last a normal workday. And if you forget to charge the battery, you can even manage another day with the smartphone battery under a low load.
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Motorola Moto G41 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (18 - 38, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (5.5 - 166, n=204, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Motorola Moto G41 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (21 - 23, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.4 - 321, n=204, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Motorola Moto G41 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (11 - 24, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=205, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme 9 5G | |
Realme 9 Pro | |
Realme 8 5G | |
Motorola Moto G41 | |
Samsung Galaxy M32 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (7.7 - 8.2, n=23) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=204, last 2 years) |
Realme 9 5G | Realme 9 Pro | Realme 8 5G | Motorola Moto G41 | Samsung Galaxy M32 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 20% | 89% | -8% | -3% | 111% | 488% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 511 | 494 -3% | 969 90% | 298.5 -42% | 297.3 -42% | 770 ? 51% | 1971 ? 286% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 120.6 | 105.3 -13% | 201 67% | 172.3 43% | 178.7 48% | 399 ? 231% | 1586 ? 1215% |
Random Read 4KB | 88.5 | 148.3 68% | 192 117% | 86.9 -2% | 98 11% | 156.6 ? 77% | 280 ? 216% |
Random Write 4KB | 95.4 | 120.4 26% | 175 83% | 64.4 -32% | 68.8 -28% | 177.7 ? 86% | 321 ? 236% |
Temperature
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Speaker
Realme 9 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Realme 9 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery life
Realme 9 5G 5000 mAh | Realme 9 Pro 5000 mAh | Realme 8 5G 5000 mAh | Motorola Moto G41 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M32 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi Websurfing | 1029 | 1047 2% | 1104 7% | 905 -12% | 1098 7% | 1015 ? -1% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Little money for a lot of performance and 5G
The realme's model naming scheme is a bit strange here: the realme 9 5G is significantly cheaper than the realme 9 Pro, however, apart from the exterior, the faster charging, and some details of the camera system, it is a very, very similar smartphone. Thus, you clearly get the better price-performance ratio here.
The SoC, in particular, makes the realme 9 5G an interesting smartphone for under 300 Euros: you hardly get that much performance in any other phone in the price range, and most of the competition does not even offer 5G. Sure, that might change in the next few months, but at the time of testing, the features of the realme 9 5G are very good for its price point.
However, some negative aspects remain: for example, the fingerprint sensor is partly inaccurate and the camera takes somewhat blurry pictures. The speaker also does not have a very good sound.
As an inexpensive smartphone with fast mobile Internet and a fast SoC, the realme 9 5G is a price-performance recommendation.
The price of the realme 9 5G is significantly higher than that of the predecessor realme 8 5G but it offers more performance and probably longer updates. If you buy the realme 8 5G it could even be a bigger bargain, since characteristics have not changed that much. 5G phones from other manufacturers for less than 300 Euros are rare, so you should look for alternatives if you want the OnePlus North CE 2 or the Xiaomi Mi 11 Lite 5G at a good price.
Price and availability
The realme 9 5G is available directly from the manufacturer starting from 260 euros.
Realme 9 5G
- 05/12/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt