Vivo Y70
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 16 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 14 scores (from 18 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo Y70
The Vivo Y70 starts as an inexpensive mid-range smartphone under 300 Euros (~$300) and offers an appealing design, an AMOLED screen, and a triple camera. Especially the quite fast Qualcomm SoC and the long update support can be the deciding factors for buying the device, but we also discovered some minor issues in detail.
Source: T3
Archive.org versionThe Vivo Y70 ends up in credit when all the pros and cons are considered – while it doesn't exactly stand out in any particular area, it has enough going for it to make it one of the better choices down at the lower end of the smartphone market when it comes to price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionIn many areas, the Vivo Y70 offers everything people are looking for in a modern smartphone. There’s a gorgeous AMOLED display, 33W fast charging and impressive cameras for the price. Performance is solid if not spectacular, while the highly reflective rear design helps it stand out aesthetically.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionThe Vivo Y70 makes an effort to dazzle with its large, vibrant AMOLED display and impressively fast charging. But its design, camera and performance feel disappointingly half-hearted. With the Poco X3 NFC bringing out the big guns for much less money, and several well-specced rivals asking for just a little extra, the Vivo Y70 seems destined to be overlooked.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Stage
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android User
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/02/2020
Source: Computerhoy
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tuexperto
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; excellent display; elegant design.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/26/2021
Source: El Androide Libre
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Good price; beautiful design; nice display; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2020
Source: Chimera Revo
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 75% features: 85% display: 85% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Smartphone Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Big screen; nice cameras; beautiful design; decent autonomy.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 01/21/2021
Source: Tutto Android
IT→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Beautiful design; great built quality. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/20/2020
Source: Frandroid
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/28/2020
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Android.com.pl
PL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 65%
Source: Smartmania.cz
CZ→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% features: 77% mobility: 88% workmanship: 87%
Source: Arena IT
→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 665: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in a 11 nm LPP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.