Oppo A53
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0 aperture, 5P lens, AI beautification
Pricecompare
Average of 5 scores (from 18 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo A53
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
Perks like a 90Hz display and superb battery life make up for the Oppo A53's slightly sluggish performance and an unexciting camera, and the premium-feeling design doesn’t hurt either. But if you can spend more, you should.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/18/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
The Oppo A53 could have been a forgettable budget phone, but thanks to its 90Hz display and decent battery life, it stands out a little from the competition. Don't expect miracles but do expect a competent device for the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobygyaan Archive.org version
OPPO has brought another midranger, however, now at a better price. The OPPO A53’s long battery life, stereo sound experience, 90 Hz display, the full-screen punch-hole design, and ColorOS 7 perks all make it sound a worthy opponent for its price. However, rivals offer more solid cameras, AMOLED display, and better performance in this segment. If you are looking for a smartphone to binge-watch an entire season, the OPPO A53 can be a good contender in this segment, the battery life is reliable. But if you are looking for a higher resolution display and better cameras, look for other options in this range.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 73% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2020
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; great speakers; long battery life; high performance; elegant design. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/21/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; big screen; decent performance; nice cameras; impressive battery life.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; elegant design; nice display; large storage; decent cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent display; nice gaming performance; beautiful design; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/10/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; impressive AI cameras; powerful processor; nice display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Long battery life; large storage; low price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/08/2020
Source: Cell Phones VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Beautiful design; great built quality; nice display; good price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2020
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; excellent display; long battery life; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Modern design; solid workmanship; good price; large battery capacity; quick charging; nice display; decent triple cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2020
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice display; long battery life; attractive price.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 09/04/2020
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent display; good processor; high autonomy; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2020
Source: Jagat Review ID→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful processor; fast system.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/07/2020
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
unknown: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.50":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.72.6%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.