Vivo V30 Lite
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 3 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo V30 Lite
Source: Gadgetbyte Nepal
Okay, moving to the conclusion, I really feel the Vivo V30 Lite to be in a confusing position. Its elder brother, the V30 5G was just priced right at the sweet spot with both impressive cameras and performance. But sadly, I couldn’t say the same about this guy! I think the price tag is a bit on the expensive side. Because the performance here is just average, and so is the main camera for both stills and videos. (The selfie camera is fine though!) To be more precise, the Snapdragon 685 can cater well to normal users, but not to those seeking some performance and power. If only, Vivo had used a better chip as I’ve aforementioned, the Helio G99. Plus a more optimized main camera! That way the phone could have brought more of an appeal.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/17/2024
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 65% performance: 65% display: 80% mobility: 85% workmanship: 85%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Log.com.tr
TR→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/25/2024
Rating: Total score: 81%
Source: Chip Online TR
TR→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/27/2024
Rating: Total score: 91%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 685: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 265 cores (four fast 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 based cores in a cluster and four power saving ARM Cortex-A53 based cores at 1.9 GHz) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in 6 nm and according to Qualcomm around 15% more CPU performance and 10% more GPU performance compared to the old SD680 (thanks to higher clock speeds).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.67":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.82.67%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
