Realme C67 4G
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 4 scores (from 6 reviews)
Reviews for the Realme C67 4G
Source: Canaltech
PT→ENSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/21/2024
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tudo Celular
PT→ENSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/09/2024
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/09/2024
Rating: Total score: 72% price: 80% display: 79% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Batista70Phone
IT→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/06/2024
Rating: Total score: 75% features: 75% display: 70% mobility: 85% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 75%
Source: Viettelstore
VN→ENPositive: Modern design; beautiful display; nice performance; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/22/2024
Source: Cell Phones
VN→ENPositive: Beautiful design; decent cameras; long battery life. Negative: Average hardware.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2024
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 685: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 265 cores (four fast 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A73 based cores in a cluster and four power saving ARM Cortex-A53 based cores at 1.9 GHz) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in 6 nm and according to Qualcomm around 15% more CPU performance and 10% more GPU performance compared to the old SD680 (thanks to higher clock speeds).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.72":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.71.75%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
