Notebookcheck

Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone Review - Inexpensive Stylus Smartphone

Motorola's first stylus phone. An affordable smartphone with a stylus - usually, this combination is a rare sight. However, Motorola is stirring the pot by making the Moto G Pro an interesting proposition: For 330 Euros (~$390), buyers get a 6.4-inch mid-range smartphone with an integrated stylus and Android One.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Marius S.),

The Moto G Pro is the first smartphone from Motorola with a stylus pen. Thus, it is a direct competitor to Samsung, which dominates the stylus smartphone market with its Galaxy Note models.

Furthermore, the Moto G Pro's MSRP of only 330 Euros (~$390) is very low for a smartphone with a stylus. Meanwhile, the price of the cheapest Galaxy Note model, the Galaxy Note 10 Lite, is still significantly above 400 Euros (~$470).

It would be unfair to reduce the Moto G Pro to its stylus support, however, since the remaining features also look good on paper. With the Snapdragon 665, the Motorola is powered by a fast octa-core SoC from the upper mid-range segment. On top of that, it is equipped with 4 GB of RAM, 128 GB of internal storage, a 48-MP triple-camera system, dual SIM, NFC, and, last but not least, Android One.

Motorola Moto G Pro (Moto G Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
Display
6.4 inch 19.2:9, 2300 x 1080 pixel 399 PPI, capacitive, IPS, FHD+, glossy: yes
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.2 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5-mm headphone jack, Card Reader: microSD up to512 GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, ambient light sensor, sensor hub, fingerprint sensor, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (band 2, 3, 5, 8), UMTS (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71), head SAR 1.52 W/kg, body SAR 1.58 W/kg, Dual SIM, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.2 x 158.6 x 75.8 ( = 0.36 x 6.24 x 2.98 in)
Battery
4000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix 48 MP (f/1.7, 1.6 µm) + 16 MP wide-angle lens (f/2.2, 2.0 µm) + 2-MP macro lens (f/2.2), laser autofocus, videos at up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1 µm, videos at up to Full [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: Dolby stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual, Stylus, modular 18-watt charger, USB cable (Type-C to Type-A), SIM tool, quick-start guide, warranty information, Android One, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
192 g ( = 6.77 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 35 g ( = 1.23 oz / 0.08 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Competing Devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
08/2020
Motorola Moto G Pro
SD 665, Adreno 610
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
79 %
01/2020
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
SD 665, Adreno 610
200 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.3"2340x1080
78 %
03/2020
Motorola Moto G8 Power
SD 665, Adreno 610
197 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.4"2300x1080
82 %
02/2020
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18
199 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.7"2400x1080
80 %
10/2018
LG Q Stylus
MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2
172 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.2"2160x1080

Currently, Motorola only offers the Moto G Pro in the color variant "Mystic Indigo". At first glance, the back cover appears to be black. However, depending on the angle of light incidence and the viewing angle, a subtle color gradient that shifts from black into a dark purple can be observed.

The fancy colors of the case partially make up for the plastic back. Since the Moto G Pro is very well built while also lying in the hand well thanks to its rounded-off back cover, this does not represent a major drawback, particularly when considering the low price.

The Moto G Pro is physically almost identical to the 6.3-inch Moto G8 Plus. They both share almost identical dimensions, even though the Moto G8 Plus does not come with a stylus. Since the Moto G Pro boasts a better screen-to-body ratio, its display is slightly larger at 6.4 inches.

The digital stylus is hidden in the bottom right corner, from which it can be easily removed thanks to a small notch on its side. When returned to its dock, applying pressure to the top of the stylus snaps it back into place.

The selfie camera of the Moto G Pro is located within a punch-hole notch, which has been subtly placed near the top left corner of the display. On the back, the main camera module, which houses three cameras and the laser autofocus, is also found in the top left. The fingerprint sensor has been placed on the back as well. The slightly recessed sensor is easy to locate.

Size Comparison

163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 76.1 mm / 3 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 199 g0.4387 lbs161.15 mm / 6.34 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 8.6 mm / 0.3386 inch 200 g0.4409 lbs160.2 mm / 6.31 inch 77.8 mm / 3.06 inch 8.4 mm / 0.3307 inch 172 g0.3792 lbs158.6 mm / 6.24 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 9.2 mm / 0.3622 inch 192 g0.4233 lbs156 mm / 6.14 inch 76 mm / 2.99 inch 10 mm / 0.3937 inch 197 g0.4343 lbs

Features - NFC & Headphone Jack But Only Hybrid Dual SIM

With 4 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage, the Moto G Pro's memory configuration is solid. The storage can be expanded by up to 512 GB via a microSD card. In doing so, however, users of the smartphone lose the dual SIM functionality, since there is no dedicated microSD slot. The microSD card can only be used for multimedia content, whereas app data cannot be transferred over.

Furthermore, the Moto G Pro also supports Bluetooth 5.0, NFC, and USB 2.0 speeds via its USB Type-C port. Conveniently, Motorola has chosen to keep the 3.5-mm headphone jack, which allows users to connect headphones and speakers to the smartphone without the use of a USB-C adapter.

Left: nano-SIM/microSD card slot
Left: nano-SIM/microSD card slot
Right: power button, volume rocker
Right: power button, volume rocker
Top: microphone, speaker
Top: microphone, speaker
Bottom: headphone jack, USB-C 2.0, microphone, speaker, stylus
Bottom: headphone jack, USB-C 2.0, microphone, speaker, stylus

Software - At Least Two Years of Guaranteed Updates Thanks to Android One

The Moto G Pro is an Android One smartphone: It uses an Android version that is almost identical to stock Android and free from bloatware. Aside from the Google apps, only a few tools from the manufacturer such as the Moto app, Moto audio and the stylus app Moto note have been preinstalled.

Guaranteed updates are another advantage of Android One: Android One smartphones are guaranteed at least two yearly OS updates from Google as well as security patches for three years. Prospective buyers can expect the Moto G Pro, which ships with Android 10, to eventually receive Android 11 and 12. At the time of writing (middle of July), the security patches date back to May 1, making them fairly recent.

Communication and GPS - Moto G Pro with Fast Wi-Fi and Accurate GPS

Although the Moto G Pro is not exactly a smartphone for globetrotters, it covers all the LTE frequencies that are relevant in Europe. While Lenovo, Motorola's parent company, does not specify the LTE speeds, they will likely be similar to those of other Moto G models such as the Moto G8 Power (LTE Cat.13, 400 Mb/s download, 75 Mb/s upload).

Apart from NFC and Bluetooth 5.0, the Moto G Pro also has onboard Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) for short-range communication. In a test with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12, the smartphone achieves fast and very consistent transfer rates of around 330 Mb/s for both downloads and uploads. This puts the Motorola between the slightly faster Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
370 (342min - 372max) MBit/s ∼100% +12%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
329 (313min - 345max) MBit/s ∼89%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
315 (157min - 352max) MBit/s ∼85% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=600)
282 MBit/s ∼76% -14%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
61.5 (43min - 58max) MBit/s ∼17% -81%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
56.5 (11min - 75max) MBit/s ∼15% -83%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
415 (295min - 452max) MBit/s ∼100% +24%
Motorola Moto G Pro
Adreno 610, SD 665, 128 GB eMMC Flash
334 (326min - 340max) MBit/s ∼80%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
278 (218min - 305max) MBit/s ∼67% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=600)
268 MBit/s ∼65% -20%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Adreno 610, SD 665, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.9 (2min - 75max) MBit/s ∼11% -87%
LG Q Stylus
Mali-T860 MP2, MT6750S, 32 GB eMMC Flash
36 (2min - 52max) MBit/s ∼9% -89%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø329 (313-345)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø334 (326-340)
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal indoors
GPS signal outdoors
GPS signal outdoors

The Moto G Pro supports the satellite navigation systems GPS, GLONASS and Galileo. Indoors, it is able to locate us very quickly with an accuracy of within four meters, while outdoors, the accuracy improves further to be within three meters.

In our real-world GPS test, the Moto G Pro performs well. On a four-kilometer bike ride, the smartphone almost matches the precision of the professional navi Garmin Edge 520, which we brought along for comparison purposes. Although at worst, the recorded route can deviate from the actual track by a few meters, the overall accuracy of the GPS is more than adequate for day-to-day navigation tasks.

Motorola Moto G Pro: Overview
Motorola Moto G Pro: Overview
Motorola Moto G Pro: Turn
Motorola Moto G Pro: Turn
Motorola Moto G Pro: Bridge
Motorola Moto G Pro: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Overview
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Turn
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge
Garmin Edge 520: Bridge

Telephony and Call Quality - Motorola Moto G Pro with High SAR Values

The Moto G Pro uses Google's default telephony app. Calls can be made via Wi-Fi and VoLTE, provided the carrier permits it.

The Moto G Pro smartphone transmits voices clearly to other cell or landline phones and reliably filters out ambient noise. In hands-free mode, both callers can be understood well.

Cameras - Good Triple-camera System with 48 MP

Main camera picture
Main camera picture

The triple-camera system of the Moto G Pro consists of a 48-MP main camera (f/1.7, 1.6 µm), accompanied by a 16-MP wide-angle lens (117°, f/2.2, 2.0 µm) and a 2-MP macro lens (f/2.2). As usual, the main camera combines four adjacent pixels into one, which by default results in pictures with a final resolution of 12 MP. Taking pictures at the full 48-MP resolution is not possible with the default camera app. Meanwhile, the 16-MP selfie camera also uses the quad-pixel method and produces 4-MP pictures.

The wide-angle lens - also called action cam - is only used for video recordings. It is located on the very top of the back cover above the flash, and like on the Moto G8 Plus it has been rotated by 90 degrees. As a result, videos can be captured in landscape mode, while the smartphone is held in portrait mode with one hand, which is convenient. At up to 8x, the available zoom level is identical to the photography mode.

Selfie camera picture with filters
Selfie camera picture with filters

Of course, the Moto G is capable of recording videos with the main camera as well, although this does not change the zoom factor. In order to do so, the action camera symbol in the camera software has to be tapped to switch back from the wide-angle to the main lens. However, the lenses cannot be switched between while recording.

While the action camera supports video recordings at up to Full HD and 60 frames per second, the main camera can capture up to 4K UHD with 30 FPS. The selfie camera is limited to Full HD video at 30 frames per second.

In good lighting, the Moto G Pro can take excellent pictures that impress with natural colors and great details. Overall, the results are good enough to rival those of significantly more expensive smartphones. In low-light situations, the camera still captures a great level of detail and the colors remain quite accurate as well.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight scene 1Daylight scene 2Low-light environment

While the analysis of the ColorChecker passport under controlled lighting conditions shows that the color reproduction of the main camera is not quite ideal, the colors accuracy is still relatively high. Although the center of the test chart looks sharp, the edges appear pale and blurry.

ColorChecker
25.2 ∆E
41 ∆E
30.8 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
42.7 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
46.3 ∆E
49.3 ∆E
23 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
41.2 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 33.64 ∆E min: 13.2 - max: 49.61 ∆E
ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Motorola Moto G Pro: 10.72 ∆E min: 1.62 - max: 17.25 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty - 18-watt Charger Included

Motorola includes a modular 18-watt charger, a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a SIM tool, a quick-start guide, and a pamphlet with warranty information with the Moto G Pro. There are no specific accessories available for the smartphone from the manufacturer. That being said, various accessories such as wireless and wired headphones can be purchased from Motorola's online shop.

The warranty period for the Moto G Pro is 24 months.

Input Devices & Handling - Moto G Pro with a Well-executed Stylus Concept

The octa-core Snapdragon 665 SoC powers the Moto G Pro for a smooth Android experience. The touchscreen is responsive, and the fingerprint sensor and the facial recognition are equally as reliable. The Moto app offers an even greater degree of comfort and allows users to define various gestures.

Pulling the surprisingly heavy stylus out of its dock immediately shows the stylus menu on the smartphone. Whenever it is inactive, it transforms into a smaller, semi-transparent icon that remains fixed on the screen regardless of the app or menu in the foreground. Via drag and drop, the stylus icon can be dragged to any position on the display.

Notes or sketches can be created by selecting the corresponding applet from the stylus menu. Apps such as the sketch tool Moto note can also be set to launch automatically when the stylus is removed from its slot. Naturally, the stylus pen can be used to navigate Android menus as well.

Overall, navigating the smartphone with the stylus feels very fast. However, the responsiveness advantages of more-expensive Galaxy Note models become apparent when drawing sketches. There is a small delay between the input and onscreen execution. While this is not an issue while navigating the menus, it becomes more and more apparent as the speed at which the stylus is dragged across the screen while drawing increases. Overall, the small input delay does not detract from the user experience.

Keyboard portrait
Keyboard portrait
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape

Display - Bright IPS Panel with a High Brightness

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The 6.4-inch IPS display of the Moto G Pro has a resolution of 2300x1080 pixels, resulting in a pixel density of 399 PPI, which is common for this device class. By contrast, the luminance exceeds the norm: At an average of 732 cd/m², the display is very bright for a mid-range smartphone.

With an even distribution of bright and dark areas (APL50), the maximum brightness still holds firm at 706 cd/m². Unfortunately, the display uses pulse-width modulation to control the brightness, which may cause issues for sensitive users.

723
cd/m²
720
cd/m²
743
cd/m²
730
cd/m²
735
cd/m²
739
cd/m²
725
cd/m²
732
cd/m²
738
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 743 cd/m² Average: 731.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 735 cd/m²
Contrast: 1470:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 5.9 | 0.64-98 Ø6
92.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.342
Motorola Moto G Pro
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3
Motorola Moto G8 Power
IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7
LG Q Stylus
IPS, 2160x1080, 6.2
Screen
11%
-19%
-16%
-7%
Brightness middle
735
628
-15%
462
-37%
510
-31%
458
-38%
Brightness
732
631
-14%
483
-34%
536
-27%
441
-40%
Brightness Distribution
97
93
-4%
93
-4%
91
-6%
94
-3%
Black Level *
0.5
0.54
-8%
0.65
-30%
0.51
-2%
Contrast
1470
1163
-21%
711
-52%
898
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.84
2
66%
5.7
2%
6.6
-13%
4.5
23%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
10.2
5.1
50%
8.9
13%
17.56
-72%
7.1
30%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.9
3.7
37%
6.5
-10%
2.9
51%
5.1
14%
Gamma
2.342 94%
2.17 101%
2.303 96%
2.242 98%
2.33 94%
CCT
7897 82%
6230 104%
8073 81%
6989 93%
7381 88%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 59.52 Hz ≤ 15 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 59.52 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 15 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 59.52 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Thanks to its high black value of 0.29 cd/m², the screen content is rich in contrast and vivid. Conversely, the color accuracy is not particularly high, although it is still satisfactory for a smartphone display. Meanwhile, the slight blue tint that is present on the IPS panel is harder to ignore and manifests in an overly cool display.

Color accuracy (color profile saturated)
Color accuracy (color profile saturated)
Color accuracy (color profile natural)
Color accuracy (color profile natural)
Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation sweeps
Saturation sweeps
Color space (target color space AdobeRGB)
Color space (target color space AdobeRGB)
Color space (target color space DCI-P3)
Color space (target color space DCI-P3)
Color space (target color space sRGB)
Color space (target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 23 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Due to its high luminosity, the screen of the Moto G Pro can still be read well in bright ambient light. Even in direct sunlight, the screen content remains somewhat readable.

As per usual, the viewing angles of the IPS display are good. When viewing the display from a steep angle, the perceived brightness slightly increases.

Outdoor use (cloudy sky)
Outdoor use (cloudy sky)
Outdoor use (direct sunlight)
Outdoor use (direct sunlight)

Performance - Solid Mid-range Performance

The Moto G Pro is powered by the Snapdragon 665, a mid-range SoC with 8 cores. It easily provides sufficient performance for daily tasks such as web browsing, WhatsApp, and YouTube.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Motorola goes head-to-head with the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and the Motorola Moto G8 Power, both of which are equipped with the same SoC. Compared to the somewhat dated stylus competitor LG Q Stylus, the Moto G Pro has a significant performance advantage. When it comes to graphics-intensive workloads, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite is the clear winner in this comparison, however.

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points ∼27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
432 Points ∼26% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
464 Points ∼28% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (432 - 483, n=5)
455 Points ∼27% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=67)
1668 Points ∼100% +271%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
365 Points ∼20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼21% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
368 Points ∼21% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (363 - 368, n=5)
366 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=62)
1789 Points ∼100% +390%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1358 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1390 Points ∼71% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1385 Points ∼71% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1256 - 1405, n=7)
1346 Points ∼69% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 3531, n=121)
1945 Points ∼100% +43%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
310 Points ∼56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
313 Points ∼57% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
311 Points ∼56% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (309 - 313, n=7)
311 Points ∼56% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=121)
553 Points ∼100% +78%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6962 Points ∼99%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6587 Points ∼93% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6963 Points ∼99% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5851 Points ∼83% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6189 - 11432, n=11)
7048 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 15299, n=524)
5973 Points ∼85% -14%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8952 Points ∼100%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8804 Points ∼98% -2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6571 Points ∼73% -27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4101 Points ∼46% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7437 - 9051, n=10)
8163 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19989, n=682)
6555 Points ∼73% -27%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2185 Points ∼70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2232 Points ∼72% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2354 Points ∼75% +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼100% +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2185 - 2444, n=11)
2284 Points ∼73% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=175)
2664 Points ∼85% +22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
908 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
897 Points ∼21% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
904 Points ∼22% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4201 Points ∼100% +363%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (897 - 995, n=11)
933 Points ∼22% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 9047, n=175)
3054 Points ∼73% +236%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1044 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1035 Points ∼29% -1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1047 Points ∼29% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3613 Points ∼100% +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1035 - 1140, n=11)
1074 Points ∼30% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=175)
2722 Points ∼75% +161%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2369 Points ∼76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2410 Points ∼77% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2488 Points ∼80% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3120 Points ∼100% +32%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1110 Points ∼36% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2154 - 2541, n=10)
2378 Points ∼76% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=527)
2229 Points ∼71% -6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
990 Points ∼21% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
988 Points ∼21% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4806 Points ∼100% +385%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
319 Points ∼7% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (980 - 999, n=10)
988 Points ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 10043, n=527)
2160 Points ∼45% +118%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1139 Points ∼27% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1151 Points ∼27% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4291 Points ∼100% +277%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
379 Points ∼9% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1097 - 1151, n=10)
1135 Points ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8386, n=528)
2014 Points ∼47% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2344 Points ∼74%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼76% +2%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼79% +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3148 Points ∼100% +34%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1112 Points ∼35% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2199 - 2503, n=11)
2365 Points ∼75% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=559)
2145 Points ∼68% -8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1668 Points ∼42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1663 Points ∼42% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1678 Points ∼42% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3958 Points ∼100% +137%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
495 Points ∼13% -70%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1650 - 1692, n=11)
1668 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=559)
2908 Points ∼73% +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1782 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1785 Points ∼48% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1809 Points ∼48% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3744 Points ∼100% +110%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
565 Points ∼15% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1754 - 1810, n=11)
1786 Points ∼48% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=559)
2441 Points ∼65% +37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2399 Points ∼79%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2468 Points ∼81% +3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2493 Points ∼82% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3056 Points ∼100% +27%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2212 - 2580, n=11)
2417 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=608)
2107 Points ∼69% -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
978 Points ∼22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
927 Points ∼21% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
984 Points ∼22% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4422 Points ∼100% +352%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
89 Points ∼2% -91%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (927 - 999, n=11)
968 Points ∼22% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 9032, n=608)
1821 Points ∼41% +86%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1126 Points ∼28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1076 Points ∼27% -4%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1137 Points ∼28% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4022 Points ∼100% +257%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
112 Points ∼3% -90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1076 - 1152, n=11)
1118 Points ∼28% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7678, n=609)
1732 Points ∼43% +54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2395 Points ∼78%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2412 Points ∼78% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2507 Points ∼81% +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3087 Points ∼100% +29%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1172 Points ∼38% -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2282 - 2596, n=11)
2429 Points ∼79% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=651)
1977 Points ∼64% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1607 Points ∼29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1616 Points ∼29% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1626 Points ∼29% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5586 Points ∼100% +248%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
98 Points ∼2% -94%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1564 - 1663, n=11)
1622 Points ∼29% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12632, n=650)
2412 Points ∼43% +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1734 Points ∼37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1744 Points ∼37% +1%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1764 Points ∼37% +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
4734 Points ∼100% +173%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
123 Points ∼3% -93%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1675 - 1795, n=11)
1750 Points ∼37% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9549, n=653)
2068 Points ∼44% +19%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23884 Points ∼97%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19349 Points ∼78% -19%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24652 Points ∼100% +3%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
10050 Points ∼41% -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (17865 - 24652, n=10)
20916 Points ∼85% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=795)
15577 Points ∼63% -35%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24804 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24871 Points ∼91% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25161 Points ∼93% +1%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9864 Points ∼36% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15403 - 25351, n=10)
23960 Points ∼88% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=793)
27196 Points ∼100% +10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
24593 Points ∼98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
23388 Points ∼93% -5%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
25046 Points ∼100% +2%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
9905 Points ∼40% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (22445 - 25046, n=10)
23870 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 117606, n=793)
21154 Points ∼84% -14%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼45%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
36 fps ∼45% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
80 fps ∼100% +122%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
17 fps ∼21% -53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (35 - 36, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=796)
45.8 fps ∼57% +27%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
35 fps ∼60%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
33 fps ∼57% -6%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
58 fps ∼100% +66%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
16 fps ∼28% -54%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (30 - 52, n=9)
35.8 fps ∼62% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 138, n=805)
31.5 fps ∼54% -10%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼26%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
19 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
73 fps ∼100% +284%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
7.1 fps ∼10% -63%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (19 - 20, n=9)
19.2 fps ∼26% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=701)
27.1 fps ∼37% +43%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
20 fps ∼35%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
18 fps ∼32% -10%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
57 fps ∼100% +185%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
6.7 fps ∼12% -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (15 - 34, n=9)
21.1 fps ∼37% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=709)
22.7 fps ∼40% +14%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼54%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
13 fps ∼54% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
24 fps ∼100% +85%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.7 fps ∼20% -64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (13 - 13, n=9)
13 fps ∼54% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=564)
21.8 fps ∼91% +68%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
14 fps ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
12 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +229%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
4.5 fps ∼10% -68%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (10 - 27, n=9)
15 fps ∼33% +7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=566)
19.7 fps ∼43% +41%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
5.1 fps ∼30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4.5 fps ∼26% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
17 fps ∼100% +233%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1.3 fps ∼8% -75%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (3.9 - 9.1, n=11)
5.65 fps ∼33% +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=320)
11.4 fps ∼67% +124%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2.8 fps ∼25% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
11 fps ∼100% +293%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
0.86 fps ∼8% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=11)
2.77 fps ∼25% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=318)
8.12 fps ∼74% +190%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.6 fps ∼31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.4 fps ∼26% -14%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps ∼27% -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
28 fps ∼100% +226%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2 fps ∼7% -77%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.2 - 15, n=11)
9.31 fps ∼33% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=324)
17.1 fps ∼61% +99%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
8.1 fps ∼26% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
31 fps ∼100% +283%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.3 fps ∼7% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (7.8 - 8.4, n=11)
8.13 fps ∼26% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=323)
19.6 fps ∼63% +142%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼24%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.1 fps ∼24% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +308%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.5 fps ∼9% -65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (6.9 - 7.2, n=9)
7.06 fps ∼24% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=489)
14.6 fps ∼50% +106%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
7.7 fps ∼31%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
6.6 fps ∼26% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
25 fps ∼100% +225%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
2.4 fps ∼10% -69%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (5.7 - 13, n=9)
7.86 fps ∼31% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=493)
13 fps ∼52% +69%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
173930 Points ∼53%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
168901 Points ∼51% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
329860 Points ∼100% +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (167305 - 181432, n=9)
171951 Points ∼52% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 622888, n=118)
322814 Points ∼98% +86%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1168 Points ∼90%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
935 Points ∼72% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
1300 Points ∼100% +11%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
657 Points ∼51% -44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (926 - 1400, n=9)
1101 Points ∼85% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=735)
826 Points ∼64% -29%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1907 Points ∼30%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
1931 Points ∼30% +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
6444 Points ∼100% +238%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
633 Points ∼10% -67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1881 - 1932, n=9)
1906 Points ∼30% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=735)
2543 Points ∼39% +33%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2765 Points ∼97%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2864 Points ∼100% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
2771 Points ∼97% 0%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
778 Points ∼27% -72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (1804 - 3174, n=9)
2681 Points ∼94% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=735)
1895 Points ∼66% -31%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4666 Points ∼82%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
4848 Points ∼85% +4%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
5707 Points ∼100% +22%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
1868 Points ∼33% -60%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (4391 - 5089, n=9)
4825 Points ∼85% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=735)
3495 Points ∼61% -25%
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2315 Points ∼68%
Motorola Moto G8 Power
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665, Adreno 610, 4096
2238 Points ∼66% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144
3393 Points ∼100% +47%
LG Q Stylus
Mediatek MT6750S, Mali-T860 MP2, 3072
882 Points ∼26% -62%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
  (2001 - 2556, n=9)
2271 Points ∼67% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=735)
1787 Points ∼53% -23%

While the Moto G Pro does not reach the highest browser benchmark scores compared to other mid-range offerings, this barely affects daily use, since web pages and their embedded content still load quickly. However, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite once again takes first place in our comparison.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=195)
41.1 Points ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
32.259 Points ∼78% +3%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
31.216 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6)
29.2 Points ∼71% -6%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
62.949 Points ∼100% +29%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
48.855 Points ∼78%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
48.109 Points ∼76% -2%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=625)
47.6 Points ∼76% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8)
47.5 Points ∼75% -3%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
19.174 Points ∼30% -61%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 158, n=177)
43 runs/min ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)
39 runs/min ∼91% +36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6)
28.9 runs/min ∼67% +1%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
28.73 runs/min ∼67%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
72 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=262)
70 Points ∼97% +27%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
56 Points ∼78% +2%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
55 Points ∼76%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9)
50.9 Points ∼71% -7%
LG Q Stylus (Chrome 69)
25 Points ∼35% -55%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
12933 Points ∼100% +41%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
9153 Points ∼71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9)
8901 Points ∼69% -3%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
8675 Points ∼67% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=793)
7954 Points ∼62% -13%
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
3474 Points ∼27% -62%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
LG Q Stylus (hrome 69)
13202.5 ms * ∼100% -198%
Average of class Smartphone (1854 - 59466, n=819)
9707 ms * ∼74% -119%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9)
4783 ms * ∼36% -8%
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80)
4663.6 ms * ∼35% -5%
Motorola Moto G Pro (Chrome 83.0.4103.106)
4433.6 ms * ∼34%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)
3188.8 ms * ∼24% +28%

* ... smaller is better

With sequential read and write speeds of 300 MB/s and 230 MB/s, respectively, the internal storage of the Moto G Pro is on par with its closest competitors, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T and Motorola Moto G8 Power. However, the trio does not stand a chance against the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite. Meanwhile, the playing field is more even in terms of reading from and writing to microSD cards, where the somewhat dated LG Q Stylus surprisingly achieves the best performance.

Motorola Moto G ProXiaomi Redmi Note 8TMotorola Moto G8 PowerSamsung Galaxy Note10 LiteLG Q StylusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
2%
0%
52%
-30%
-9%
-19%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
55.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
52.83 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
49.7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-11%
59.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
7%
63.55 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
14%
62.2 (26.1 - 73.5, n=23)
11%
51.1 (1.7 - 87.1, n=536)
-9%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
73.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
71.63 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
69.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
73.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
0%
83.12 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
13%
75.2 (29.2 - 85.9, n=23)
2%
69.1 (8.1 - 96.5, n=536)
-6%
Random Write 4KB
89.36
91.15
2%
132.63
48%
142
59%
12.07
-86%
45.2 (8.48 - 151, n=25)
-49%
36.4 (0.14 - 319, n=890)
-59%
Random Read 4KB
65.51
90.38
38%
57.7
-12%
132
101%
31.45
-52%
68.8 (20.7 - 108, n=25)
5%
59.7 (1.59 - 324, n=890)
-9%
Sequential Write 256KB
233.63
173.95
-26%
181.88
-22%
190.8
-18%
121.4
-48%
186 (90 - 258, n=25)
-20%
129 (2.99 - 911, n=890)
-45%
Sequential Read 256KB
294.07
315.75
7%
300.9
2%
776.7
164%
241.7
-18%
289 (144 - 499, n=25)
-2%
345 (12.1 - 1802, n=890)
17%

Gaming - Moto G with Limitations

The Snapdragon 665 SoC's integrated graphics chip Adreno 610 belongs to the lower mid-range in terms of performance. Games, including recent titles, run relatively smoothly. However, the graphics settings often need to be toned down in order to achieve smooth frame rates.

Otherwise, users can expect results matching our Asphalt 9: Legends test. With our test tool Gamebench, we recorded a choppy average frame rate of 11 FPS - this is far removed from an enjoyable experience. PUBG Mobile takes a more proactive approach: Here, the HD graphics setting is not available in the first place, and instead users may choose between the two low-end settings smooth and balanced. With the latter, our test device reaches an average of 25 FPS. Although this is not entirely smooth, it is playable.

Asphalt 9: Legends
Asphalt 9: Legends
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0102030Tooltip
; PUBG Mobile; 0.19.0: Ø24.8 (16-27)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; 2.3.4a: Ø11.6 (4-25)

Emissions - Good Dolby Speakers, No Throttling under Load

Temperature

GFXBench battery test T-Rex
GFXBench battery test T-Rex
GFXBench battery test Manhattan
GFXBench battery test Manhattan

With a maximum temperature of 28.5 °C, the heat development of the Moto G Pro is entirely unproblematic during idle. While the temperatures rise significantly under load, a peak value of 43.9 °C means that it can still be held fairly comfortably.

Despite the relatively high surface temperatures under load, the internal heat management of the Moto G Pro is good. The GFXBench battery test confirms this. Even after rendering the test scenarios T-Rex and Manhattan in a loop 30 times each, the frame rates remain as high as in the beginning of the test. 

Max. Load
 43.7 °C
111 F
39.9 °C
104 F
38.2 °C
101 F
 
 43.9 °C
111 F
39.6 °C
103 F
38.4 °C
101 F
 
 42.1 °C
108 F
39 °C
102 F
38.4 °C
101 F
 
Maximum: 43.9 °C = 111 F
Average: 40.4 °C = 105 F
37.6 °C
100 F
39.7 °C
103 F
44.1 °C
111 F
36.8 °C
98 F
39.7 °C
103 F
42.6 °C
109 F
35.9 °C
97 F
38.9 °C
102 F
41.3 °C
106 F
Maximum: 44.1 °C = 111 F
Average: 39.6 °C = 103 F
Power Supply (max.)  40.9 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 21.7 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

Speaker test: Pink noise
Speaker test: Pink noise

The list of advantages includes the Moto G Pro's stereo speakers featuring Dolby technology. For a mid-range phone, the audio is excellent. That being said, the measurements show that they lack bass almost entirely and reach a rather low maximum volume level of 81.9 dB(A).

Via the 3.5-mm headphone jack and Bluetooth 5.0, external audio devices such as headphones and speakers can be connected to the Moto G Pro. Furthermore, the audio codec aptX is supported.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.836.62539.940.13131.933.44038.936.65043.739.26329.830.38025.926.810026.326.512524.933.116021.644.82001950.725018.954.431518.155.440016.659.650016.265.563014.969.78001570.6100015.671.2125014.973.6160014.972.8200015.669.8250014.667.3315014.270.5400014.170.7500014.469.6630014.667.2800014.962.41000015.265.21250015.461.91600015.760.9SPL59.568.76666.36470.627.581.9N12.922.418.319.715.825.3152.5median 15.4median 65.5Delta2.18.745.247.543.745.234.836.937.640.739.542.136.636.329.130.128.429.130.533.924.742.322.851.621.955.421.559.319.962.120.767.719.271.118.772.42275.518.274.317.873.317.770.217.87217.67617.877.417.772.218.167.518.359.218.767.91972.619.46466.13185.1191.662.4median 19median 67.928.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMotorola Moto G ProMotorola Moto G8 Power
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Motorola Moto G Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery Life - Enough Power for at Least One Day

Energy Consumption

While the Moto G Pro's energy consumption is nothing out of the ordinary, it is not quite as economical as most of its competitors.

With the included 18-watt charger, the Motorola phone can be quickly charged. In our test, fully recharging the 4200-mAh battery took almost 2 h 40 m.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.6 / 2.3 / 2.8 Watt
Load midlight 4.2 / 6.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
30%
30%
-9%
34%
15%
22%
Idle Minimum *
1.6
0.62
61%
0.9
44%
0.9
44%
0.69
57%
1.036 (0.62 - 1.7, n=10)
35%
0.891 (0.2 - 3.4, n=897)
44%
Idle Average *
2.3
1.77
23%
1.3
43%
1.6
30%
1.7
26%
1.942 (1.3 - 2.3, n=10)
16%
1.756 (0.6 - 6.2, n=896)
24%
Idle Maximum *
2.8
1.8
36%
1.6
43%
1.9
32%
1.73
38%
2.43 (1.6 - 3.5, n=10)
13%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=897)
27%
Load Average *
4.2
3.42
19%
3.2
24%
8.4
-100%
3.21
24%
3.88 (3.2 - 4.7, n=10)
8%
4.12 (0.8 - 10.8, n=891)
2%
Load Maximum *
6.9
6.14
11%
7.1
-3%
10.3
-49%
5.31
23%
6.82 (6.09 - 7.7, n=10)
1%
6.11 (1.2 - 14.2, n=891)
11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

In our battery test, the Moto G Pro lasts slightly above 13 hours. The runtime during H.264 video playback is even higher at almost 15 hours. Overall, one battery charge should easily last for at least one day, even with intensive use.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
40h 50min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14h 42min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 50min
Motorola Moto G Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8T
4000 mAh
Motorola Moto G8 Power
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
4500 mAh
LG Q Stylus
3300 mAh
Battery Runtime
-4%
27%
5%
-39%
Reader / Idle
2450
2205
-10%
1529
-38%
H.264
882
1071
21%
527
-40%
WiFi v1.3
792
764
-4%
1002
27%
904
14%
419
-47%
Load
290
274
-6%
200
-31%

Pros

+ integrated stylus
+ Android One
+ NFC
+ fast Wi-Fi
+ good camera
+ bright IPS display
+ good Dolby speakers

Cons

- only a hybrid dual SIM slot
- PWM
- limited gaming capabilities

Verdict - Motorola Moto G Pro Is a Force to Be Reckoned with

In review: Motorol Moto G Pro. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany
In review: Motorol Moto G Pro. Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

An inexpensive smartphone with a stylus - with the Moto G Pro, Motorola has filled this niche and released a serious competitor to Samsung's Galaxy Note series.

For 330 Euros (~$390), buyers get a well-equipped mid-range smartphone with a stylus that, even though it cannot quite match the precision of its Samsung counterpart, is well suited to daily use.

If you are looking for an inexpensive smartphone with a stylus, the Motorola Moto G Pro is definitely worth considering.

Our only complaint regarding the stylus relates to the phone's name - "Moto G Pro" does not in any way hint at the fact that users of the smartphone benefit from the advantages that stylus inputs can provide. Although interestingly, the US version of the Moto G Pro is called "Moto G Stylus", its feature set is worse: There is neither dual SIM nor NFC support, and instead of the 18-watt charger it only comes with a 10-watt model.

Back to the Moto G Pro: Apart from its stylus and the other aforementioned advantages, the user experience is further enhanced by features such as Dolby speakers, a bright IPS display, a good camera and fast Wi-Fi. As an Android One device, it is guaranteed to receive software updates for the coming two years.

Motorola Moto G Pro - 07/14/2020 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
60 / 75 → 81%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
43 / 70 → 61%
Weight
89%
Battery
90%
Display
82%
Games Performance
13 / 64 → 20%
Application Performance
59 / 86 → 68%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
63%
Average
72%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Motorola Moto G Pro Smartphone Review - Inexpensive Stylus Smartphone
Manuel Masiero, 2020-08- 1 (Update: 2020-08- 3)
Manuel Masiero
Editor of the original article: Manuel Masiero - Review Editor
In 1986, when I had annoyed my parents long enough, they finally bought me a C64 that I had seen at a friend's place - and immediately knew that this was what I wanted. Since then, the fascination for computers has never left me and basically I tinker with everything I can get my hands on. From the C64 to the Amiga 500 and a hugely uncool IBM computer with 8088 CPU (and green IBM monochrome monitor!) in the early 90s, the list grew longer and longer. The current projects are called PC, Tablet and Smartphone.