Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/1.8
Average of 1 scores (from 3 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo U10
Source: NDTV Gadgets
It seems as though going online-only has allowed Vivo to deliver some seriously competitive hardware on a very tight budget. The Vivo U10 performs admirably and looks pretty slick. We often felt as though we were using a phone that was in a higher price bracket. On the other hand, it's bulky and awkward to use, with a UI that we really think needs to be toned down.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Mobile Indian
The combination of the triple-camera setup at the rear and 5,000mAh battery is the major USP of Vivo U10 at this price. It seems to be a decent smartphone but the performance and user interface needs to be tested thoroughly before giving our final verdict. As for the competition is concerned, the smartphone will face a tough competition with the likes of Realme 5, Samsung Galaxy M10s, Moto E6s, Lenovo K10 Plus and more.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/24/2019
Source: Danviet VN→EN
Positive: Low price; large battery capacity; nice triple cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/26/2019
CommentQualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
665: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in a 11 nm LPP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
70%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.