TCL 20L+
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.2, 28mm, 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Price comparison
Average of 3 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the TCL 20L+
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/12/2023
Source: Gadgetguy
Archive.org versionTCL is ramping up its 2021 smartphone range with the TCL 20 range. This review covers the TCL 20 L+ 4G (Lite+) and the 5G that, apart from the processor, camera set-up, and battery size, share the same parentage. First, let me assure you that the TCL 20 L+ 4G and the 5G are high-quality phones. Neither is class-leading, but you can’t make a mistake with either. There is a little too much marketing hype on the website (but that is a universal problem), and in both cases, they are not exploiting the full capabilities of the excellent Qualcomm System-on-Chip (SoC) under the bonnet. We are reviewing both models together and will show the different results from over 70 tests. Their ratings and explanation in detail are at the end of the review, or just click here to skip all the technical stuff. Hint: 5G for $100 more – it wins hands down but not without caveats.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 75% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Computerhoy
ES→ENSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/12/2022
Rating: Total score: 79% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: El Español
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Decent hardware; nice cameras; elegant design; good autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/18/2021
Source: Want.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl
NL→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; nice display; long battery life; good main camera. Negative: Average performance; unsupported 5G.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/25/2021
Source: Yamobi
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; long battery life; NFC chip. Negative: Heavy and bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/04/2021
Source: Yamobi
RU→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Elegant design; great built quality; long battery life; NFC chip. Negative: Heavy and bulky.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/06/2021
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 610: Integrated (in the Snapdragon 665) graphics card based on the Adreno 600 architecture. The performance of the GPU is between the Adreno 510 and 512/612 and therefore in the lower mid range. Supports DirectX11_1, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.2.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 662: Fast mid-range ARM SoC with 8 CPU Kryo 260 cores (four fast 2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores in a cluster and two power saving 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) and a rather slow Adreno 610 GPU. Manufactured in a 11 nm LPP process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.67":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.76.67%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
