Notebookcheck Logo

Onyx Boox Page review - Android-apps on a handy e-ink tablet

Compact and practical? At just 7 inches, the Onyx Boox Page is a very handy e-reader that uses Android as its operating system. Reading on the display is really fun, but can you also use other apps on a black and white display with a slow response time?
Onyx Boox Page
Onyx Boox Page
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Kryo 260
Graphics adapter
Memory
3 GB 
Display
7.00 inch 4:3, 1682 x 1264 pixel 301 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, E-Ink, Carta1200 Screen with AG glass flat cover-lens, glossy: yes
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 23 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6 x 156 x 137 ( = 0.24 x 6.14 x 5.39 in)
Battery
2300 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Android 11
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, card slot tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
195 g ( = 6.88 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
290 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77.2 %
12/2023
Onyx Boox Page
SD 662, Adreno 610
195 g32 GB eMMC Flash7.00"1682x1264
77.5 %
11/2023
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
SD 680, Adreno 610
430 g64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash10.30"1240x930
79.4 %
08/2022
Huawei MatePad Paper
Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6
360 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.30"1872x1404
75.2 %
08/2023
Lenovo Smart Paper
RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2
408 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.30"1872x1404

Case and features - plastic and limited memory

Onyx Boox offers many e-readers and larger tablets with an e-ink display. For example, we recently tested the Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C (approx. 550 Euros (~$600) at amazon.de) or the Tab Ultra C Pro (approx. 700 Euros (~$764) at amazon .de), both with a color display. Now let's take a closer look at the Onyx Boox Page, which is significantly more compact and cheaper: the 7-inch device is available for just 290 Euros (~$316). Although it only has a black and white Carta 1200 e-ink display, it can handle Android apps just like its bigger brothers.

The dark gray plastic casing of the Onyx Boox Page is beautifully designed and has a tactile letter pattern printed on the back. The device has a clean finish and is stable in itself, but can be pressed in with medium force and creaks quite noticeably.

The frame is wider on one side so that the e-reader can be held comfortably in one hand. There are also two buttons here that can be used to easily turn the pages of an e-book. At 195 grams (~6.9 oz), the reader is about as heavy as a smartphone and can be held comfortably in the hand for relatively long periods of time.

The 3 GB RAM is sufficient for an e-reader, as is the 32 GB mass storage. However, as the small e-ink tablet can also be used for other activities such as listening to music or Android apps, it is good that the memory can also be expanded using a microSD card. In our test with the Angelbird V60 reference card, the card reader proved to be quite fast.

External devices can be connected via Bluetooth 5.0. Data can be exchanged directly with a PC via the USB-C port, which can also be used to charge the device.

Onyx Boox Page
Onyx Boox Page
Onyx Boox Page
Onyx Boox Page

Size comparison

225.2 mm / 8.87 inch 182.7 mm / 7.19 inch 6.65 mm / 0.2618 inch 360 g0.794 lbs226 mm / 8.9 inch 193 mm / 7.6 inch 5.8 mm / 0.2283 inch 430 g0.948 lbs226 mm / 8.9 inch 195 mm / 7.68 inch 5.5 mm / 0.2165 inch 408 g0.899 lbs156 mm / 6.14 inch 137 mm / 5.39 inch 6 mm / 0.2362 inch 195 g0.4299 lbs210 mm / 8.27 inch 148 mm / 5.83 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 2.9 g0.00639 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Onyx Boox Page
  (Angelbird V60)
34.6 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)
31.3 MB/s -10%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
  (Angelbird V60)
28.6 MB/s -17%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (28.9-51.1)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø43.5 (28.7-54.3)
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.2 (31.7-81.3)
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.9 (35.8-86.7)

Communication, software and operation - Android as an operating system

WiFi 5 is the fastest Wi-Fi standard that the Onyx Boox Page comes with. The tablet thus achieves good transfer rates for its price range, but there are sometimes significant drops, especially in the direction of reception. We noticed this in the tests with our reference router Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000. Unfortunately, the Onyx Boox Page is not mobile network-capable.

The software used is Android 11, but the interface is strongly adapted to the requirements of an e-reader, so the focus is on the e-book library. Unfortunately, the Onyx Boox Store cannot be used in Europe, but at least there are some open source books in English. The Google Play Store is pre-installed in a separate section called "Apps", which can also be used to download reader apps from third-party providers such as Amazon Kindle, Tolino and others. Almost all Android apps can be used on the tablet, but due to the black and white display with a low frame rate, videos or games are usually not useful.

The power button is located on the bottom edge, and there are also scroll buttons next to the screen. There is no option for biometric protection of the tablet, for example via a fingerprint sensor. You can only set a password to protect your data. The touchscreen responds well to our inputs, but you have to be prepared for slight delays in operation due to the e-ink display and the mediocre system power.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
945 (826min - 958max) MBit/s +164%
Onyx Boox Page
358 (341min - 374max) MBit/s
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
350 (322min - 366max) MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper
286 (236min - 308max) MBit/s -20%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Huawei MatePad Paper
928 (812min - 949max) MBit/s +222%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
294 (274min - 318max) MBit/s +2%
Onyx Boox Page
288 (161min - 322max) MBit/s
Lenovo Smart Paper
211 (186min - 246max) MBit/s -27%

Legend

 
Onyx Boox Page Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Qualcomm Adreno 610, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Paper HiSilicon Kirin 820e, ARM Mali-G57 MP6, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Lenovo Smart Paper Rockchip RK3566, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø287 (161-322)
Onyx Boox Page; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (341-374)

E-Reading - Numerous setting options

The reader can handle the following formats ex works: pdf, djvu, azw, azw3, doc, docm, docx, epub, fb2, fbz, html, mobi, odt, prc, rtf, sxw, trc, txt, chm and ppt. However, more exotic formats are also no problem thanks to the app support.

Neo Reader, which is launched by default when a compatible file is opened, offers a wide range of options: You can use two-finger gestures to enlarge or reduce the text, automatically turn the page after a certain time, comprehensively adjust the format of the text and also optimize the contrast for the best possible visibility. There is also a text-to-speech function that works with Google's speech synthesis. The preset voice reads the text reliably, but does not sound very pleasant and the emphasis is often strange in poetic texts.

Display - With bright backlight

Close-up screen
Close-up screen

The E-Ink-Carta1200 display offers 1,682 x 1,264 pixels and a 7-inch diagonal. It is a black and white display. The panel was introduced in 2021 and offers higher contrast and faster response times than its predecessors.

Nevertheless, the special features of an e-ink display also apply here: The response times and frame rates are not comparable to those of IPS or OLED panels, making it almost impossible to play movies or fast-paced games. Also, ghost images of the previous screen content often remain after updating the image.

On the other hand, the screen shines when displaying documents with great contrasts and legibility even without backlighting in sufficient ambient light. Once the image has been set up, it can be retained for static images even without a power supply. This is easy on the eyes and reduces energy consumption.

The lighting on the Onyx Boox Page can actually get quite bright: We measured up to 151 cd/m² in our tests with the spectrophotometer and CalMAN software. We did not notice any PWM flickering.

129
cd/m²
145
cd/m²
143
cd/m²
137
cd/m²
141
cd/m²
151
cd/m²
139
cd/m²
140
cd/m²
148
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 151 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 141.4 cd/m² Minimum: 0.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 141 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
Onyx Boox Page
E-Ink, 1682x1264, 7.00
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
E-Ink Kaleido 3, 1240x930, 10.30
Huawei MatePad Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Lenovo Smart Paper
E-Ink, 1872x1404, 10.30
Response Times
11%
9%
32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
120 ?(47, 73)
121 ?(66.8, 54.2)
-1%
121 ?(61, 60)
-1%
134.4 ?(56.2, 68.2)
-12%
Response Time Black / White *
116 ?(49, 67)
89.3 ?(43.5, 45.8)
23%
94 ?(47, 47)
19%
27.5 ?(14.4, 13.1)
76%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-42%
-40%
-16%
Brightness middle
141
46.5
-67%
61.9
-56%
113
-20%
Brightness
141
47
-67%
60
-57%
106
-25%
Brightness Distribution
85
91
7%
80
-6%
83
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
20.45
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
39.33
Greyscale dE 2000 *
11.1
9.1
9.9
Gamma
1.211 182%
2.02 109%
1.371 160%
CCT
6463 101%
6848 95%
7116 91%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -21%
-16% / -20%
8% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
116 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 49 ms rise
↘ 67 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
120 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 47 ms rise
↘ 73 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale

Performance, emissions and battery life - Mediocre power

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 is used as the SoC. It comes from 2019 and is fast enough to allow you to scroll through books and menus fairly smoothly. When using apps, the somewhat limited RAM and slow data storage must be taken into account, meaning that the e-ink tablet struggles with very complex applications. However, most e-reading apps run smoothly on the tablet and the power is usually sufficient for everyday use.

When surfing the Internet, you occasionally have to deal with delays when loading pages and images. If you just want to quickly check something on the Internet, the power is sufficient. However, if you spend a lot of time in the browser, the forced pauses could be annoying.

The Onyx Boox Page only heats up barely noticeably to a maximum of 29.5 °C (85.1 °F), even under prolonged load. The processor also does not reduce its performance after prolonged use.

The e-ink tablet comes with a speaker so that audio books or music can be played directly from the device. The speaker is not too loud and sounds quite treble-heavy. Voices can be heard clearly, but do not sound very full. External audio devices can be connected via the USB-C port or Bluetooth. This works without any problems and the sound output is clear and also has significantly more mids and lows.

The manufacturer packs a 2,300 mAh battery into the compact housing of the Onyx Boox Page. This means that the capacity is significantly lower than that of larger devices and you actually have to make do with shorter battery runtimes: With minimal backlighting and a regular page turn via our script, the e-ink tablet lasts around 15 hours. This should easily be enough for a leisurely day of reading.

The tablet can be charged with a maximum of 10 watts, so it takes around 2:30 hours for the battery to be fully charged again.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (140 - 1892, n=68, last 2 years)
664 Points +141%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
566 Points +106%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
323 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (275 - 316, n=13)
308 Points +12%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
275 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
143 Points -48%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (312 - 8524, n=68, last 2 years)
2362 Points +210%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1853 Points +143%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (763 - 1453, n=13)
1299 Points +70%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1287 Points +69%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
763 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
312 Points -59%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 17267, n=65, last 2 years)
8736 Points +173%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (3195 - 7554, n=6)
5608 Points +76%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4535 Points +42%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4045 Points +27%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
3195 Points
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2571 Points +127%
Average of class Tablet
  (361 - 14235, n=51, last 2 years)
2019 Points +79%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1231 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1106 - 1905, n=12)
1220 Points +8%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1131 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
567 Points -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2675 Points +168%
Average of class Tablet
  (290 - 24605, n=51, last 2 years)
2126 Points +113%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1077 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (974 - 1074, n=12)
1017 Points +2%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
998 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
517 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Tablet
  (858 - 5751, n=51, last 2 years)
2790 Points +32%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2462 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2108 - 2513, n=12)
2368 Points +12%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
2262 Points +7%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2113 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
858 Points -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4281 Points +479%
Average of class Tablet
  (267 - 14235, n=60, last 2 years)
3212 Points +334%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (740 - 1197, n=12)
1135 Points +53%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1079 Points +46%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
740 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
596 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4472 Points +597%
Average of class Tablet
  (240 - 24605, n=60, last 2 years)
3812 Points +494%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1191 Points +86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (642 - 1081, n=12)
999 Points +56%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
642 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
530 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
3725 Points +135%
Average of class Tablet
  (441 - 5751, n=60, last 2 years)
3237 Points +104%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1588 - 2534, n=12)
2240 Points +41%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1588 Points
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1061 Points -33%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
812 Points -49%
Wild Life Score
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1925 Points +405%
Average of class Tablet
  (286 - 7933, n=60, last 2 years)
1631 Points +328%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
437 Points +15%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
381 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (369 - 391, n=11)
378 Points -1%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
286 Points -25%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Tablet
  (289 - 25317, n=66, last 2 years)
2922 Points +677%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
1886 Points +402%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
418 Points +11%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
376 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (366 - 382, n=8)
370 Points -2%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
289 Points -23%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (3 - 111, n=70, last 2 years)
21.2 fps +162%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
19 fps +135%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (4.8 - 15, n=13)
10.5 fps +30%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
8.1 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
4.6 fps -43%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3 fps -63%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (2.5 - 279, n=70, last 2 years)
35.5 fps +355%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
29 fps +272%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (7.4 - 8.6, n=13)
8.27 fps +6%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
7.8 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
7.6 fps -3%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.9 fps -50%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (1.9 - 97.3, n=70, last 2 years)
14.3 fps +198%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
13 fps +171%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.9 - 9.6, n=13)
6.43 fps +34%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
4.8 fps
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2.7 fps -44%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.9 fps -60%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.9 - 90, n=70, last 2 years)
13.2 fps +355%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
10 fps +245%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2.9 fps 0%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
2.9 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (2.5 - 2.9, n=13)
2.78 fps -4%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.4 fps -52%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Tablet
  (0.4 - 48, n=68, last 2 years)
6.22 fps +465%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
4.8 fps +336%
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1.3 fps +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (1.1 - 1.2, n=3)
1.133 fps +3%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
1.1 fps
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
0.6 fps -45%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (2672 - 74614, n=72, last 2 years)
23028 Points +144%
Huawei MatePad Paper
HiSilicon Kirin 820e, Mali-G57 MP6, 4096
18755 Points +99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
  (8893 - 10247, n=14)
9495 Points +1%
Onyx Boox Page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662, Adreno 610, 3072
9440 Points
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
6358 Points -33%
Lenovo Smart Paper
Rockchip RK3566, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
5022 Points -47%
Onyx Boox PageOnyx Boox Note Air 3 CHuawei MatePad PaperLenovo Smart PaperAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
159%
151%
-43%
-33%
205%
Sequential Read 256KB
277.1
690.8
149%
880.1
218%
163
-41%
Sequential Write 256KB
116.6
384.1
229%
256.2
120%
139
19%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
65
157.7
143%
145.6
124%
25.3
-61%
Random Write 4KB
75.4
160.5
113%
183.1
143%
8.8
-88%
22.4 ?(0.75 - 91, n=247)
-70%

Temperature

Max. Load
 22.9 °C
73 F
23.3 °C
74 F
24.5 °C
76 F
 
 23.1 °C
74 F
23.9 °C
75 F
29.5 °C
85 F
 
 22.8 °C
73 F
23.5 °C
74 F
25.9 °C
79 F
 
Maximum: 29.5 °C = 85 F
Average: 24.4 °C = 76 F
29.5 °C
85 F
26.3 °C
79 F
24.6 °C
76 F
28.9 °C
84 F
25.5 °C
78 F
24.1 °C
75 F
26 °C
79 F
24 °C
75 F
23.6 °C
74 F
Maximum: 29.5 °C = 85 F
Average: 25.8 °C = 78 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C = 106 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.3 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.


Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back
01234567891011Tooltip
Onyx Boox Page Adreno 610, SD 662, 32 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.3 (2.28-2.3)
Huawei MatePad Paper Mali-G57 MP6, Kirin 820e, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø11.3 (10.9-11.3)
Lenovo Smart Paper Mali-G52 MP2, RK3566, 64 GB eMMC Flash; 0.0.0.0: Ø1.728 (1.71-1.735)

Speaker

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203835.22529.428.83126.324.14032.828.45037.837.86329.724.38022.715.510018.91512520.611.816012.9102009.214.225010.327.23157.332.24006.835.85008.642.663012.34780010.747.810001153.612508.759.916008.757.720009.260.2250010.256.9315011.463.9400013.263.9500014.555.5630014.466.2800015.369.41000016.362.21250016.356.91600017.250.7SPL24.774.1N0.528.6median 11.4median 53.6Delta3.314.833.640.83036.626.328.928.829.234.331.224.723.519.316.722.31722.119.319.72013.92311.536.210.344.98.551.19.256.610.561.313.86511.768.69.672.59.772.210.874.111.273.31470.81367.313.668.413.872.314.567.215.458.216.351.817.235.324.982.50.649.3median 13.6median 61.33.215.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnyx Boox PageOnyx Boox Note Air 3 C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Onyx Boox Page audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (36.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 93% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 23%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life

Battery Runtime - Reader / Idle
Average of class Tablet
  (746 - 5003, n=52, last 2 years)
1934 min +116%
Onyx Boox Page
2300 mAh
894 min
Onyx Boox Note Air 3 C
3700 mAh
1030 min
Huawei MatePad Paper
3625 mAh
963 min
Lenovo Smart Paper
3500 mAh
1056 min
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 54min

Pros

+ Bright backlighting
+ E-Ink panel with great contrast...
+ ... and high resolution
+ Support for Android apps
+ Built-in loudspeaker
+ Light and handy

Cons

- Screen hardly suitable for videos
- Speaker sound treble-heavy
- No fingerprint sensor

Conclusion - Not so expensive and flexible thanks to Android apps

In the test: Onyx Boox Page. Test device provided by:
In the test: Onyx Boox Page. Test device provided by:
KexTech

The Onyx Boox Page is in itself a good 7-inch e-reader with bright lighting, extensive setting options in the reading software, support for many formats, scroll buttons and a high-contrast, high-resolution e-ink display.

But there are also some special features: The loudspeaker and audio output via Bluetooth, for example, but above all, the support for Android apps. This makes the e-ink tablet even more flexible in its possible uses and also makes you less dependent on an e-book provider, as apps from other stores can be installed without any problems.

The battery life is not quite as good as that of larger (and significantly more expensive) e-ink tablets, but is sufficient for a day's browsing. The speaker sounds a little treble-heavy and is not as loud, and the data on the device cannot be protected by fingerprint. There are also clear disadvantages compared to tablets with conventional screens: Movies or fast-paced games are hardly enjoyable on the slow e-ink display and there is no camera.

The Onyx Boox Page is an e-reader with a 7-inch display and bright backlight, whose capabilities can be significantly expanded thanks to support for Android apps.

If you would like a larger reader, you can get the Lenovo Smart Paper with a 10.3-inch display. It also supports Android apps. Significantly more expensive, but with a color display and metal chassis, is the Onxy Boox Note Air 3 C.

Price and availability

You can get the Onyx Boox Page from our rental dealer KEX currently for around 270 Euros (~$295). You can also buy from KEX via Ebay, in which case it costs 290 Euros (~$316), but shipping is free.

The reader is currently not so easy to obtain from other retailers, but alza.de offers it, for example.

Onyx Boox Page - 12/15/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
62 / 80 → 77%
Pointing Device
79%
Connectivity
29 / 70 → 41%
Weight
88 / 40-88 → 100%
Battery
77%
Display
81%
Games Performance
10 / 78 → 13%
Application Performance
40 / 92 → 43%
Temperature
97%
Noise
100%
Audio
49 / 91 → 54%
Average
66%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Onyx Boox Page review - Android-apps on a handy e-ink tablet
Florian Schmitt, 2023-12-16 (Update: 2023-12-16)