Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Oppo Find X3 Lite smartphone review: Fast mid-ranger with a 90 Hz OLED panel and a 65-watt power adapter

New player. Oppo is still a relatively unknown player in Germany, but it's already number 4 in global smartphone sales after Apple, Samsung, and Xiaomi. This means that the Chinese manufacturer is doing quite a lot right from the customer's point of view. We will find out in our review whether that is also the case with the Find X3 Lite, the smallest model from Oppo's new flagship family.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

With the Find X3 Lite, Oppo introduced its new mid-range smartphone. However, it's not actually new: The Find X3 Lite is the Oppo Reno5 5G that is only available in Asia. Oppo has renamed it for the European market.

The Find X3 Lite shares the same features with its Far-East twin, the Reno5 5G. It offers a 6.43-inch OLED display, the mid-range Snapdragon 765G SoC that is optimized for gaming, as well as 8 GB of RAM, and 128 GB of UFS 2.1 storage. A 64 MP quad-camera setup and Android 11 are also part of the package.

Oppo Find X3 Lite (Find X3 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.43 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 410 PPI, capacitive, OLED, FHD , 16.7 million colors, glossy: yes, 90 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 109.3 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: geomagnetic sensor, proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyro sensor, pedometer, gyroscope, USG OTB, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, 65-watt SuperVOOC 2.0, IP52
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Bands 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Bands 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/38/39/40/41/66), 5G (Bands 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41/77/78), dual SIM, nano SIM, head SAR 0.991 W/kg, body SAR 1.276 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.9 x 159.1 x 73.4 ( = 0.31 x 6.26 x 2.89 in)
Battery
4300 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix main camera (f/1.7, PDAF, CDAF, 20x digital zoom); 8 MP ultra wide-angle (f/2.2); 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4); 2 MP black/white camera (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected]
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4), videos up to [email protected]
Additional features
Speakers: mono, Keyboard: virtual, power adapter, headset, USB-C cable, SIM tool, quick-start guide, ColorOS 11.1, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
172 g ( = 6.07 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 100 g ( = 3.53 oz / 0.22 pounds)
Price
449 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Lite
SD 765G, Adreno 620
172 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.43"2400x1080
84 %
11/2020
Google Pixel 4a 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
168 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.20"2340x1080
85 %
07/2020
LG Velvet
SD 765G, Adreno 620
180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.80"2460x1080
82 %
07/2020
Oppo Find X2 Lite
SD 765G, Adreno 620
180 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.40"2400x1080
84 %
08/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
192 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.57"2340x1080

The 6.43-inch Oppo Find X3 Lite scores points with a stylish and stable chassis. The most striking feature on its glass front is the 32 MP selfie camera, which is no longer drop-shaped in contrast to the Find X2 Lite predecessor, but it now sits quite inconspicuously in the upper left corner of the display. And another difference: The Find X3 Lite is protected against dust and spraying water thanks to its IP52 certification.

On the back, the quad-camera setup that protrudes by about 2 millimeters catches the eye. However, the back cover deserves just as much attention, because you get a different case material and consequently a different feel depending on the color selection.

The Find X3 Lite only has a smooth glass back in the "Galactic Silver" color variant and weighs 180 grams in this case. In contrast, the matte "Starry Black" or "Astral Blue" color variants, which is the one featured by our review sample, are made of a multilayered polymer that is easier to grip due to its slightly roughened surface. The plastic back cover also reduces the weight to 172 grams.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

167.08 mm / 6.58 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 7.85 mm / 0.3091 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs163.7 mm / 6.44 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 192 g0.4233 lbs160.3 mm / 6.31 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 7.96 mm / 0.3134 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs159.1 mm / 6.26 inch 73.4 mm / 2.89 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 172 g0.3792 lbs153.9 mm / 6.06 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 168 g0.3704 lbs

Connectivity - Dual SIM but no microSD slot

The Find X3 Lite features a 3.5 mm headphone jack, but neither stereo speakers nor a microSD slot are included. In return, the SIM slot now holds two SIM cards instead of one like in the Find X2 Lite. Regardless of the color variant, there's always 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage. The USB-C port (USB 2.0) supports USB OTG.

Left: Volume rocker, dual SIM
Left: Volume rocker, dual SIM
Right: Power button
Right: Power button
Top: Microphone
Top: Microphone
Bottom: Speaker, USB-C 2.0, microphone, 3.5 mm audio jack
Bottom: Speaker, USB-C 2.0, microphone, 3.5 mm audio jack

Software - Android 11 and ColorOS 11.1 for the Find X3 Lite

Oppo equips its smartphone with Android 11 and the ColorOS 11.1 user interface. At the time of performing our review (early March), the Android security patches were at the level of February 2020 and still quite up to date as a result.

About 109 GB of the 128 GB of storage space is free. Besides Google apps and a handful of system tools, third-party apps like Netflix, Facebook, and WPS Office are also preinstalled.

Communication and GPS - Precise positioning, moderate WLAN speeds

The Find X3 Lite's communication portfolio includes Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, and NFC. The smartphone can also establish 5G connections and supports all major 5G bands in Germany such as bands 1, 3, 28, and 78.

Oppo's smartphone is not entirely convincing in terms of WLAN speed. As the measurements with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router show, it achieves fairly stable transfer rates. However, they clearly lag behind the competition at a maximum of 348 Mb/s.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
668 (618min - 677max) MBit/s ∼100% +120%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
620 (300min - 635max) MBit/s ∼93% +105%
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
618 (310min - 644max) MBit/s ∼93% +104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=303, last 2 years)
415 MBit/s ∼62% +37%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
303 (164min - 328max) MBit/s ∼45%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
300 (211min - 318max) MBit/s ∼45% -1%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
LG Velvet
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
683 (656min - 691max) MBit/s ∼100% +100%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
671 (652min - 683max) MBit/s ∼98% +96%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (545min - 662max) MBit/s ∼92% +84%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
603 (517min - 635max) MBit/s ∼88% +76%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=303, last 2 years)
419 MBit/s ∼61% +23%
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
342 (335min - 348max) MBit/s ∼50%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340345339344342341344348342338337342341336345336343344348338341339341337339341342347335345337345339344342341344348342338337342341336345336343344348338341339341337339341342347335345337164304321322307320322321316320311328302305305284263265311268302285302309305305309285299280Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø341 (335-348)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø298 (164-328)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

To determine its location, the Find X3 Lite uses GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo, and QZSS. In the test, it's able to quickly determine its position indoors and outdoors with an accuracy of up to three meters in both cases.

The smartphone also passes our practical test: During our 10-kilometer bike ride, the Find X3 Lite tracks the route almost as precisely as the Garmin Edge 500 professional navigation device.

Oppo Find X3 Lite: Overview
Oppo Find X3 Lite: Overview
Oppo Find X3 Lite: Lake
Oppo Find X3 Lite: Lake
Oppo Find X3 Lite: Turning point
Oppo Find X3 Lite: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Overview
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Lake
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point
Garmin Edge 500: Turning point

Telephone and call quality

The Find X3 Lite supports VoLTE and VoWiFi. However, whether you can actually use both IMS systems depends on your network provider. If you use two SIM cards in the smartphone, one of them can connect to 5G networks.

The Find X3 Lite convinces with its good call quality in the test. Voices are reproduced clearly even in hands-free mode. 

Cameras - Quad-camera setup with 64 MP and 20x digital zoom

Main camera sample
Main camera sample

Like the Find X2 Lite, the Find X3 Lite also features a quad-camera setup but with slightly different key specs. The main camera now has a resolution of 64 MP instead of the previous 48 MP, but it uses the same aperture of f/1.7 and achieves a digital zoom of up to 20x. It records videos at up to 4K and 30 FPS. However, there's no optical image stabilizer.

The main camera is complemented by an 8 MP ultra wide-angle camera (f/2.2), a 2 MP macro camera (f/2.4), and a 2 MP monochrome camera (f/2.4). The selfie camera has a resolution of 32 MP and delivers decent quality during video calls.

In daylight, the quad-camera setup takes good photos with rich colors that sometimes look a bit unnatural, though. Image sharpness could also be a bit higher in some cases. The camera software gets a lot out of the subjects when it comes to zoom photos, and relatively sharp pictures are produced at lower zoom levels. Low-light environments overtax the camera, because image details get lost in the pixel mush.

Selfie camera sample
Selfie camera sample
Main camera sample
Main camera sample

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight-Scene 1Daylight-Scene 2Ultra wide-angle5x zoomLow-light photo
ColorChecker
15.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X3 Lite: 8.55 ∆E min: 3.26 - max: 16.37 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
29 ∆E
65.1 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.7 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76.3 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
90.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X3 Lite: 46.94 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 90.94 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - 65-watt power adapter and protective case in the box

The included 65-watt power adapter
The included 65-watt power adapter

Oppo equips the Find X3 Lite with a 65-watt fast charger, a USB-C cable ( Type-A to C), headphones, a transparent silicon protective case, a SIM tool, and a quick-start guide.

The Find X3 Lite comes with a 24-month warranty.

Input devices and handling - In-display fingerprint scanner and 2D face recognition

The Find X3 Lite's 90 Hz touchscreen responds quickly and precisely to inputs, and it provides a fast usage experience together with the Snapdragon 765G. The fingerprint sensor integrated into the display and the facial recognition mechanism work just as quickly.

Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Display - Bright AMOLED display with 90 Hz refresh rate

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The OLED display features 2400x1080 pixels at 90 Hz. Alternatively, you can also switch to 60 Hz. On a pure white background, the display has an average brightness of 572.3 cd/m². We can even get up to 738 cd/m² from the display in the APL50 measurement, but only a maximum of 398 cd/m² is possible without the brightness sensor.

The OLED display relies on PWM for brightness control. Below brightness levels of 29%, PWM flickering ranges between 120.8 and 367.6 Hz, while flickering occurs at 89 Hz above this level. This can be bothersome for users with sensitive eyes.

OLED flickering at minimum panel brightness (120.8 - 367.6 Hz)
OLED flickering at minimum panel brightness (120.8 - 367.6 Hz)
OLED flickering at medium panel brightness (89 Hz)
OLED flickering at medium panel brightness (89 Hz)
OLED flickering at maximum panel brightness (89 Hz)
OLED flickering at maximum panel brightness (89 Hz)
572
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
569
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
579
cd/m²
572
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 580 cd/m² Average: 572.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.82 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.8
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Oppo Find X3 Lite
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.43
Google Pixel 4a 5G
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.20
LG Velvet
P-OLED, 2460x1080, 6.80
Oppo Find X2 Lite
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.40
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.57
Screen
39%
10%
-21%
30%
Brightness middle
569
669
18%
586
3%
638
12%
584
3%
Brightness
572
671
17%
587
3%
633
11%
583
2%
Brightness Distribution
97
94
-3%
97
0%
95
-2%
97
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.2
1
69%
2.8
12%
5.6
-75%
1.17
63%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6
1.8
70%
6.3
-5%
8.9
-48%
2.95
51%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.3
1.5
65%
2.3
47%
5.3
-23%
1.7
60%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.25 98%
2.01 109%
2.25 98%
2.231 99%
CCT
6607 98%
6685 97%
6827 95%
7118 91%
6341 103%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 29 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 29 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 14804 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

As is typical for OLEDs, contrast levels are excellent. In the "Vivid" default display mode, the panel achieves a fairly balanced color reproduction. Although colors and grayscales aren't reproduced with complete accuracy, this isn't noticeable to the naked eye.

Color accuracy (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Color accuracy (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Color space (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Color space (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Grayscales (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Grayscales (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Color saturation (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)
Color saturation (Vivid display color mode, DCI-P3 target color space)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.1 ms).

Thanks to its bright and high-contrast OLED panel, the Find X3 Lite performs well in outdoor use. There's nothing to complain about in terms of viewing-angle stability, either.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Snapdragon 765G delivers sufficient performance for everyday tasks

With the Snapdragon 765G, the Find X3 Lite is equipped with a fast mid-range SoC that works with eight Kryo 475 cores and is supported by the Adreno 620 graphics chip. With 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of UFS 2.1 storage, the remaining hardware components are also suitable; therefore, Oppo's smartphone achieves a good system performance overall - apps and websites load quickly, and lags are very rare.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
615 Points ∼91%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
601 Points ∼89% -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
554 Points ∼82% -10%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
572 Points ∼85% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
673 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=17)
603 Points ∼90% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=234, last 2 years)
566 Points ∼84% -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1810 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1631 Points ∼84% -10%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1797 Points ∼93% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1815 Points ∼94% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1908 Points ∼98% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=17)
1781 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4455, n=234, last 2 years)
1940 Points ∼100% +7%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1172 Points ∼57%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
925 Points ∼45% -21%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1187 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1183 Points ∼58% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (168 - 1278, n=12)
1060 Points ∼52% -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=124, last 2 years)
2053 Points ∼100% +75%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1231 Points ∼57%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
Points ∼0% -100%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1242 Points ∼58% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1293 Points ∼60% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1231 - 1302, n=10)
1265 Points ∼59% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=128, last 2 years)
2141 Points ∼100% +74%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
11041 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
10122 Points ∼92% -8%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
9154 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9756 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8730 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8687 - 11041, n=16)
9734 Points ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=223, last 2 years)
9982 Points ∼90% -10%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9800 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8319 Points ∼85% -15%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7808 Points ∼80% -20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
7754 Points ∼79% -21%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
7786 Points ∼79% -21%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7245 - 9989, n=17)
8308 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=267, last 2 years)
7878 Points ∼80% -20%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47838 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
46246 Points ∼97% -3%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43325 Points ∼91% -9%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
43965 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
45304 Points ∼95% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (38137 - 48201, n=17)
44398 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=207, last 2 years)
40247 Points ∼84% -16%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
70216 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
56690 Points ∼81% -19%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
68764 Points ∼98% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68456 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
69506 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (56690 - 70216, n=17)
67538 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=207, last 2 years)
58049 Points ∼83% -17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
22614 Points ∼80%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
28116 Points ∼100% +24%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18769 Points ∼67% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19521 Points ∼69% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20429 Points ∼73% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (14891 - 28331, n=17)
20632 Points ∼73% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8324 - 59268, n=207, last 2 years)
23323 Points ∼83% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4606 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2983 Points ∼64% -35%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3576 Points ∼76% -22%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4478 Points ∼95% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4693 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2972 - 4693, n=17)
4318 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=260, last 2 years)
3369 Points ∼72% -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5144 Points ∼88%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2862 Points ∼49% -44%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5005 Points ∼86% -3%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5136 Points ∼88% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5832 Points ∼100% +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2844 - 5832, n=17)
4882 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=260, last 2 years)
3943 Points ∼68% -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3371 Points ∼96%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3501 Points ∼100% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1689 Points ∼48% -50%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3074 Points ∼88% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3452 Points ∼99% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3529, n=17)
3237 Points ∼92% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=260, last 2 years)
2756 Points ∼79% -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4783 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3933 Points ∼80% -18%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3678 Points ∼75% -23%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4663 Points ∼95% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4893 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=17)
4562 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=276, last 2 years)
3948 Points ∼81% -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5383 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4053 Points ∼75% -25%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5437 Points ∼100% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5356 Points ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5335 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4036 - 5437, n=17)
5181 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=276, last 2 years)
4986 Points ∼92% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3441 Points ∼97%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3563 Points ∼100% +4%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1790 Points ∼50% -48%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3114 Points ∼87% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3492 Points ∼98% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3651, n=17)
3275 Points ∼92% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5784, n=274, last 2 years)
2908 Points ∼82% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3299 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2261 Points ∼68% -31%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3278 Points ∼98% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼97% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3346 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2261 - 3346, n=17)
3162 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=258, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼79% -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3286 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2048 Points ∼62% -38%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3289 Points ∼99% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3302 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3321 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2048 - 3342, n=17)
3137 Points ∼94% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=258, last 2 years)
2786 Points ∼84% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3345 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3556 Points ∼100% +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3312 Points ∼93% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼92% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3425 Points ∼96% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2964 - 3556, n=17)
3331 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=258, last 2 years)
2802 Points ∼79% -16%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3535 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2948 Points ∼82% -17%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2934 Points ∼81% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3524 Points ∼98% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3605 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=17)
3413 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=274, last 2 years)
3193 Points ∼89% -10%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3557 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2814 Points ∼78% -21%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3547 Points ∼99% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3568 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3589 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2814 - 3592, n=17)
3467 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12914, n=274, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼99% 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3459 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3539 Points ∼100% +2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1898 Points ∼54% -45%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3325 Points ∼94% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3495 Points ∼99% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3765, n=17)
3288 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5793, n=274, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼84% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3094 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2287 Points ∼73% -26%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2877 Points ∼92% -7%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3072 Points ∼98% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3130 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2287 - 3130, n=17)
2966 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (426 - 6977, n=215, last 2 years)
2636 Points ∼84% -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3186 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼67% -33%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3193 Points ∼100% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3177 Points ∼99% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3198 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 3198, n=17)
3053 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 11259, n=215, last 2 years)
2959 Points ∼93% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2809 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2978 Points ∼100% +6%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2145 Points ∼72% -24%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2757 Points ∼93% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2893 Points ∼97% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2979, n=17)
2742 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1786 - 4061, n=215, last 2 years)
2651 Points ∼89% -6%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1681 Points ∼61%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1023 Points ∼37% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1015 - 1681, n=5)
1405 Points ∼51% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=90, last 2 years)
2754 Points ∼100% +64%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1681 Points ∼57%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1026 Points ∼35% -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1022 - 1681, n=5)
1402 Points ∼47% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=87, last 2 years)
2964 Points ∼100% +76%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
59 fps ∼94%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
43 fps ∼69% -27%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
60 fps ∼96% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43 - 86, n=15)
62.5 fps ∼100% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=215, last 2 years)
57 fps ∼91% -3%
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
96 fps ∼91%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼46% -49%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
96 fps ∼91% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼90% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
95 fps ∼90% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (48 - 97, n=15)
88.7 fps ∼84% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=215, last 2 years)
106 fps ∼100% +10%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
53 fps ∼96%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
30 fps ∼55% -43%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
47 fps ∼85% -11%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
50 fps ∼91% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼100% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (30 - 55, n=15)
46.5 fps ∼85% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=213, last 2 years)
45 fps ∼82% -15%
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
55 fps ∼89%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
31 fps ∼50% -44%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
55 fps ∼89% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
56 fps ∼90% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
49 fps ∼79% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (31 - 56, n=15)
51.1 fps ∼82% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=214, last 2 years)
62 fps ∼100% +13%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼57% -43%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
32 fps ∼86% -14%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
34 fps ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
33 fps ∼89% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 37, n=15)
31.5 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=212, last 2 years)
35.4 fps ∼96% -4%
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼87%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
22 fps ∼52% -41%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
37 fps ∼87% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
38 fps ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
38 fps ∼89% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (22 - 38, n=15)
35.3 fps ∼83% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 121, n=212, last 2 years)
42.5 fps ∼100% +15%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼95%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
11 fps ∼50% -48%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼81% -14%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
18 fps ∼81% -14%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
18 fps ∼81% -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (11 - 21, n=15)
17.7 fps ∼80% -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 61, n=211, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼100% +6%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼82%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼47% -43%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼82% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼82% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼82% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 21, n=15)
19.7 fps ∼77% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 75, n=211, last 2 years)
25.5 fps ∼100% +21%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
14 fps ∼61% -39%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
20 fps ∼87% -13%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
21 fps ∼91% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (13 - 23, n=17)
20.2 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=280, last 2 years)
22.2 fps ∼97% -3%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼90%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼51% -43%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
23 fps ∼90% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
24 fps ∼94% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
24 fps ∼94% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (12 - 24, n=17)
21.6 fps ∼84% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
25.6 fps ∼100% +11%
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
15 fps ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.9 fps ∼59% -41%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
12 fps ∼80% -20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
13 fps ∼87% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.8 - 15, n=17)
12.3 fps ∼82% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=280, last 2 years)
14.8 fps ∼99% -1%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.4 fps ∼83%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5.5 fps ∼54% -35%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼84% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.6 fps ∼85% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
8.5 fps ∼84% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5.3 - 13, n=17)
8.38 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=279, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼100% +20%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
332305 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
287407 Points ∼86% -14%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
308878 Points ∼93% -7%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
323940 Points ∼97% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
318669 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (285731 - 332305, n=14)
312767 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=186, last 2 years)
331491 Points ∼100% 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4025 Points ∼98%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3237 Points ∼79% -20%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
3674 Points ∼90% -9%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3856 Points ∼94% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4094 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3237 - 4094, n=14)
3813 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (323 - 6959, n=198, last 2 years)
3625 Points ∼89% -10%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6774 Points ∼99%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5997 Points ∼87% -11%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6430 Points ∼94% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6856 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
6069 Points ∼89% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5411 - 6936, n=14)
6506 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=198, last 2 years)
6635 Points ∼97% -2%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5102 Points ∼90%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5046 Points ∼89% -1%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
4556 Points ∼80% -11%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5214 Points ∼92% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5683 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=14)
5099 Points ∼90% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=198, last 2 years)
4241 Points ∼75% -17%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5206 Points ∼93%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
2525 Points ∼45% -51%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5153 Points ∼92% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5172 Points ∼92% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
5201 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2525 - 5247, n=14)
4732 Points ∼84% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 16996, n=198, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼100% +8%
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1459 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 4a 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1436 Points ∼98% -2%
LG Velvet
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1226 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo Find X2 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1196 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 6144
1462 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1139 - 1462, n=14)
1372 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=198, last 2 years)
1272 Points ∼87% -13%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
93.643 Points ∼100% +17%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
92.693 Points ∼99% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=192, last 2 years)
89.7 Points ∼96% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11)
81.1 Points ∼87% +1%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
79.988 Points ∼85%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
78 Points ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 194, n=202, last 2 years)
78 Points ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
76 Points ∼97% -3%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
76 Points ∼97% -3%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
75 Points ∼96% -4%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
72 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13)
71.5 Points ∼92% -8%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
19009 Points ∼100% +23%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
18556 Points ∼98% +20%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
18546 Points ∼98% +20%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
17890 Points ∼94% +16%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=209, last 2 years)
17325 Points ∼91% +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14)
16671 Points ∼88% +8%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
15422 Points ∼81%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=211, last 2 years)
3999 ms * ∼100% -36%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14)
3721 ms * ∼93% -27%
Oppo Find X3 Lite (Chrome 88.0.4324.181)
2941.1 ms * ∼74%
Oppo Find X2 Lite (Chrome 83)
2778 ms * ∼69% +6%
LG Velvet (Chrome 83)
2665.8 ms * ∼67% +9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83)
2602.2 ms * ∼65% +12%
Google Pixel 4a 5G (Chrome 86.0.4240.110)
2560.6 ms * ∼64% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X3 LiteGoogle Pixel 4a 5GLG VelvetOppo Find X2 LiteXiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5GAverage 128 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-13%
-14%
-7%
-8%
-29%
-28%
Sequential Read 256KB
953.46
945.02
-1%
924.54
-3%
910.45
-5%
979.54
3%
772 (427 - 999, n=84)
-19%
752 (41.9 - 2037, n=285, last 2 years)
-21%
Sequential Write 256KB
466.19
228.73
-51%
409.21
-12%
475.23
2%
476.87
2%
255 (13.6 - 511, n=84)
-45%
327 (11.9 - 1321, n=285, last 2 years)
-30%
Random Read 4KB
194.66
168.63
-13%
154.28
-21%
169.44
-13%
156.45
-20%
146 (92.6 - 239, n=84)
-25%
134 (13.5 - 325, n=285, last 2 years)
-31%
Random Write 4KB
166.03
186.74
12%
135.87
-18%
146.1
-12%
138.47
-17%
119 (18.2 - 290, n=84)
-28%
120 (4.97 - 330, n=285, last 2 years)
-28%

Games - They run smoothly with some limitations

The Adreno 620 graphics chip that is integrated into the Snapdragon 765G ensures that modern games run smoothly for the most part. For example, PUBG Mobile ran without noticeable stutters or lags at HD/High settings. However, the Find X3 Lite can't benefit from its 90 Hz display all the time. Take Armajet for instance: The 2D shooter supports up to 120 Hz, but it only allowed a maximum of 60 Hz on the smartphone.

Armajet
Armajet
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile

Emissions - Full performance can always be accessed

Temperature

Both the surface temperatures and the internal temperatures of the Find X3 Lite remain within the green range: The smartphone is always pleasant to the touch and doesn't have to resort to throttling, so that it can always use its full SoC performance.

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find X3 Lite
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.5 (1673min - 1681max) % ∼100%
Max. Load
 35.7 °C
96 F
35.1 °C
95 F
33.2 °C
92 F
 
 35.9 °C
97 F
35.8 °C
96 F
33.3 °C
92 F
 
 34.5 °C
94 F
33 °C
91 F
32.6 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 35.9 °C = 97 F
Average: 34.3 °C = 94 F
32.6 °C
91 F
34.5 °C
94 F
34.7 °C
94 F
31.2 °C
88 F
34.7 °C
94 F
35 °C
95 F
30.4 °C
87 F
33.5 °C
92 F
33.4 °C
92 F
Maximum: 35 °C = 95 F
Average: 33.3 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  25.6 °C = 78 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22.4 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Speaker

The mono speaker in the Find X3 Lite doesn't produce a very balanced sound, since trebles predominate, and bass is nonexistent. However, its audio capabilities are okay for the occasional music playback.

The included headphones fit the 3.5 mm audio jack (SNR: 82.4 dBFS), while wireless headsets and speakers can be paired via Bluetooth 5.1. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.939.2252932.23125.131.24031.431.85042.436.36332.430.1802631.910021.537.81251534.716021.342.720014.449.42501456.831513.560.140011.963.450012.267.363012.666.480013.473.2100012.276.8125012.377.2160012.778.2200013.580.225001382.1315012.880.5400013.775.9500013.576.2630013.875.6800014.779.51000013.680.31250014.271.7160001558SPL25.790.1N0.781.5median 13.5median 73.2Delta110.230.438.723.334.42629.922.636.234.535.119.936.114.736.614.436.714.943.117.853.618.951.311.756.413.964.51362.310.367.210.470.612.470.411.173.211.272.112.776.612.379.512.678.712.777.712.782.612.78413.579.71475.813.570.614.972.8166824.890.50.681median 12.7median 70.618.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X3 LiteGoogle Pixel 4a 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X3 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Google Pixel 4a 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Enduring battery, XXL 65-watt power adapter

Energy consumption

Oppo includes a massive 65-watt power adapter with its smartphone that weighs a hefty 100 grams. It fully recharges an empty battery in just under 40 minutes.

The Find X3 Lite shows no issues when it comes to power consumption, and its rates match the average of all smartphones with a Snapdragon 765G SoC pretty accurately.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.92 / 1.97 / 1.98 Watt
Load midlight 3.33 / 5.77 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Find X3 Lite
4300 mAh
Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh
LG Velvet
4300 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
29%
15%
-6%
-36%
-7%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
0.92
0.7
24%
0.66
28%
0.75
18%
1.5
-63%
0.965 (0.66 - 1.8, n=15)
-5%
0.934 (0.37 - 2.5, n=234, last 2 years)
-2%
Idle Average *
1.97
0.96
51%
1.58
20%
2.55
-29%
2.2
-12%
1.899 (0.82 - 2.55, n=15)
4%
1.843 (0.65 - 3.94, n=234, last 2 years)
6%
Idle Maximum *
1.98
0.98
51%
1.6
19%
2.58
-30%
2.9
-46%
2.07 (0.85 - 2.9, n=15)
-5%
2.1 (0.69 - 4.2, n=234, last 2 years)
-6%
Load Average *
3.33
2.95
11%
3.3
1%
3.21
4%
4.4
-32%
3.98 (2.73 - 6.8, n=15)
-20%
4.46 (2.1 - 8.4, n=234, last 2 years)
-34%
Load Maximum *
5.77
5.2
10%
5.46
5%
5.29
8%
7.2
-25%
6.19 (4.4 - 10.3, n=15)
-7%
7.24 (3.16 - 12.3, n=234, last 2 years)
-25%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The Find X3 Lite's 4,300 mAh battery manages a good runtime of almost 14 hours in our WLAN test, so it should easily survive a day of intensive use. With the exception of the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G, the comparison devices all perform slightly worse in the WLAN test.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
13h 54min
Oppo Find X3 Lite
4300 mAh
Google Pixel 4a 5G
3885 mAh
LG Velvet
4300 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Lite
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
4160 mAh
Battery Runtime
-8%
-11%
-13%
6%
Reader / Idle
2459
1683
WiFi v1.3
834
768
-8%
741
-11%
728
-13%
884
6%
Load
341
448
H.264
1337
1403

Pros

+ bright OLED display with a 90 Hz refresh rate
+ 5G, dual SIM, VoLTE, VoWiFi
+ NFC, Bluetooth 5.1
+ precise GPS
+ decent daylight photos
+ 65-watt fast charger
+ long battery life

Cons

- no microSD slot
- mediocre WLAN speed
- mono speaker

Verdict on the Oppo Find X3 Lite - Good mid-range smartphone at an ambitious price

In review: Oppo Find X3 Lite. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.
In review: Oppo Find X3 Lite. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.

The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a good smartphone that primarily scores points with its long-lasting battery and bright OLED display. Although the internal storage can't be expanded, it should be sufficiently large for most users at 128 GB. The same is true for the SoC performance, since it's easily sufficient for everyday use and the occasional game.

The Oppo Find X3 Lite is a solid mid-range smartphone that doesn't offer much that is new compared with its much cheaper Find X2 Lite predecessor.

However, the Oppo phone doesn't have it easy in the highly competitive mid-range segment, because it lacks a real unique selling point. Sure, the list of features is very solid, but 5G, for example, is nothing special anymore as is the 90 Hz refresh rate. The 64 MP quad-camera setup takes decent pictures, but it's far from being one of the best in its class. The 65-watt fast charger is the only minor plus point.

The Find X3 Lite costs 449 Euros (~$536) and is consequently (even) more expensive than many mid-range contenders. If you don't need a 90 Hz refresh rate, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G or the Find X2 Lite are good alternatives. Both are available for well under 300 Euros (~$356).

Price and availability

Oppo prices the Find X3 Lite at 449 Euros (~$536). Since our review will go online on the smartphone's official launch date, we can't provide any comparison prices yet.

Oppo Find X3 Lite - 03/08/2021 v7
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
90%
Battery
90%
Display
86%
Games Performance
37 / 64 → 57%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
73 / 90 → 82%
Camera
60%
Average
77%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Manuel Masiero
Editor of the original article: Manuel Masiero - Senior Tech Writer - 151 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012
My fascination for computers started with the C64. Since then, I’ve put everything that comes my way in terms of hardware through its paces. From the C64 to the Amiga 500 and the first PC with an 8088 CPU, my list of projects has grown increasingly longer. For more than 20 years now I have also turned my hobby into my profession and have been active in the mobile section of Notebookcheck since 2021. Before that, I worked as a hardware editor for IDG Media (tecChannel.de) and VNU Business Publications (PC professional), among others.
Stephanie Chamberlain
Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 364 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
I've been fascinated with technology ever since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I'm currently also interested in specializing in Java programming.
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oppo Find X3 Lite smartphone review: Fast mid-ranger with a 90 Hz OLED panel and a 65-watt power adapter
Manuel Masiero, 2021-03-11 (Update: 2021-03-11)