Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Oppo Find X3 Pro review: The smartphone with the microscope camera

More colors. The Find X3 Pro is Oppo's answer to the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra; therefore, it offers a high-end smartphone that breaks new ground especially in terms of the camera. Some improvements have been made compared to the predecessor, but our review also reveals some minor setbacks.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...

The Oppo Find X3 Pro is the successor to the Find X2 Pro and features a lot of fine-tuning in terms of specifications. For instance, the smartphone now sports a newer SoC and more modern storage. RAM remains unchanged at 12 GB, but only the 256 GB storage variant is offered in this country - last year it was 512 GB. However, we can't rule out the possibility of more models coming to Europe.

Oppo places a special focus on the camera, which uses an exclusive sensor from Sony for the first time, but this is time-limited. The Chinese have installed it twice and also have an optical zoom on board, but they don't rely on extraordinarily long focal lengths but go more in-depth instead with a microscope camera.

Oppo shows its confidence when it comes to the price and charges 1,149 Euros (~$1,373) for its flagship smartphone.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Find X3 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G 8 x 1.8 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.70 inch 20.1:9, 3216 x 1440 pixel 526 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 10-bit colors, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 236.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: geomagnetic, color temperature, proximity, accelerometer, gravity, gyroscope, pedometer, OTG
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G (band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.26 x 163.6 x 74 ( = 0.33 x 6.44 x 2.91 in)
Battery
17.41 Wh, 4500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 2x 2250 mAh, 3.87 V, SuperVOOC 2.0, AirVOOC
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX766, f/1.8, 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS; 50 MP (ultra wide, IMX766, f/2.2, PDAF, 110,3°); 13 MP (2x optical zoom, f/2.4); 3 MP (microscope, f/3.0); Camera2 API level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.4)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: on-screen, 65-watt charger, USB cable, ColorOS 11.2, 24 Months Warranty, body SAR: 1.221 W/kg, head SAR: 0.881 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (dual-band), GLONASS (single-band), BeiDou (triple-band), Galileo (dual-band), fanless, waterproof
Weight
193 g ( = 6.81 oz / 0.43 pounds), Power Supply: 142 g ( = 5.01 oz / 0.31 pounds)
Price
1,149 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.7 %
03/2021
Oppo Find X3 Pro
SD 888 5G, Adreno 660
193 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
90.2 %
02/2021
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14
227 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3200x1440
88.1 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
SD 865, Adreno 650
223 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2340x1080
88.6 %
12/2020
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14, A14 Bionic GPU
228 g128 GB NVMe6.70"2778x1284
85.8 %
03/2020
Oppo Find X2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
202 g512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.70"3168x1440

Case - Find X3 Pro with unique camera design

Contrary to the current trend, the Oppo Find X3 Pro has become even a bit lighter, although the battery has grown in capacity; this makes it one of the lightest smartphones with such a large display. The latter is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5, while ceramic glass is used on the back, which has a curved camera hump. Not only does this look much more elegant, but it also avoids crevices and edges where dust can collect. Nevertheless, the Oppo smartphone lies quite wobbly on a table.

The gap dimensions of the Find X3 Pro are tight and even. The smartphone reacts reluctantly when we try to twist it, but it creaks lightly. The aluminum frame has a high-gloss finish, but it's not particularly susceptible to fingerprints. The SIM card slot protrudes slightly and can accommodate two nano SIM cards.

The battery is permanently installed and can't be replaced by the user. Like the predecessor, the Find X3 Pro is also protected against dust and water ingress according to the IP68 standard. It's available in black, white, and blue.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

165.2 mm / 6.5 inch 74.4 mm / 2.93 inch 9.5 mm / 0.374 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs165.1 mm / 6.5 inch 75.6 mm / 2.98 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 227 g0.5 lbs163.6 mm / 6.44 inch 74 mm / 2.91 inch 8.26 mm / 0.3252 inch 193 g0.4255 lbs162.38 mm / 6.39 inch 75.04 mm / 2.95 inch 9.45 mm / 0.372 inch 223 g0.4916 lbs160.8 mm / 6.33 inch 78.1 mm / 3.07 inch 7.4 mm / 0.2913 inch 228 g0.503 lbs

Connectivity - Oppo phone with USB 3.2 and HDMI

The Oppo Find X3 Pro has one USB 3.2 port (Gen. 1), which is used to charge the smartphone and exchange data with a computer. In addition, wired image output via HDMI or DisplayPort is also possible using an optional adapter. OTG is also supported, so that external storage media or peripherals can be connected. However, this has to be enabled first, and it deactivates automatically when the function hasn't been used for 10 minutes. This is a bit annoying for users who want to output audio via USB-C, for example.

Otherwise, the configuration is pretty complete and up to date. Besides Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, and Wi-Fi 6E, 5G is available as well. An audio jack, radio receiver, IR blaster, microSD support, and a notification LED aren't available. The latter is replaced by an always-on display and edge lighting.

Top: Microphone
Top: Microphone
Left: Volume rocker
Left: Volume rocker
Right: Power
Right: Power
Bottom: Speaker, USB, microphone, SIM slot
Bottom: Speaker, USB, microphone, SIM slot

Software - Strict power saving under Android 11

The Oppo Find X3 Pro comes with Google Android 11 and the in-house UI ColorOS 11.2. Besides numerous Google apps, only a few third-party apps are preinstalled, which only include Facebook and Netflix, but the latter can only be disabled and not uninstalled.

Oppo promises two years of updates for its flagship smartphone, which includes two major updates and monthly security updates.

The user interface looks quite tidy and is somewhat reminiscent of Xiaomi's MiUI, but it does without ads and relies on a few additional apps for phone management and game control. Unfortunately, there's no integrated solution to safeguard the user's data locally. The strict energy management is more annoying, because apps that run in the background, which also includes various fitness trackers, are rigorously shut down by the system unless this is allowed in the respective app's energy management settings beforehand.

Communication and GNSS - Find X3 Pro hardly leaves anything to be desired

The Oppo Find X3 Pro offers a broad spectrum of mobile frequencies and supports all modern standards. Only mmWave is not supported for 5G. The smartphone's reception didn't show any problems in the test.

The Wi-Fi module supports Wi-Fi 6E and VHT160 with MIMO antenna technology. Even though our reference router, the Netgear Nighthwk AX12, doesn't support the latest standard, we can already see much faster performance in Wi-Fi 6 networks than with last year's models - at least for sending data. Furthermore, the Find X3 Pro's data transmission is very stable, and the range is also convincing in the test.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1281 (635min - 1400max) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
848 (822min - 881max) MBit/s ∼66% -34%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
803 (437min - 889max) MBit/s ∼63% -37%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
633 (523min - 703max) MBit/s ∼49% -51%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
650 (568min - 698max) MBit/s ∼51% -49%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
509 (264min - 571max) MBit/s ∼40% -60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=286, last 2 years)
472 MBit/s ∼37% -63%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
922 (904min - 928max) MBit/s ∼100% +32%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 (156min - 180max) MBit/s ∼18% -76%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
896 (454min - 921max) MBit/s ∼97% +29%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
754 (346min - 881max) MBit/s ∼82% +8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
697 (500min - 767max) MBit/s ∼76%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
A14 Bionic GPU, A14, 128 GB NVMe
575 (364min - 613max) MBit/s ∼62% -18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=286, last 2 years)
465 MBit/s ∼50% -33%
07014021028035042049056063070077084091098010501120119012601330140074570260766965865666566071974969865173774066076775070971474564871064072272773874574272550074570260766965865666566071974969865173774066076775070971474564871064072272773874574272550063513421180131912791277129312821315123212091400127513111262128512891272121713411341118212761262129012591234130013451301Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø697 (500-767)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1260 (635-1400)
GPS Test: Outdoors
Outdoors
GPS Test: Indoors
Indoors
GPS Test: Supported navigation systems
GNSS

The Oppo Find X3 Pro relies on numerous navigation networks for positioning and also supports dual-band or even triple-band positioning. The satellite fix takes a moment to be available indoors, but the smartphone's position is determined quite accurately after that.

The Oppo smartphone didn't show flawless route tracking during our short test drive, but it's much more accurate than the Garmin Edge 500 bike computer, which is particularly evident in the area of the turning point.

GNSS test ride: Overview
GNSS test ride: Overview
GNSS test ride: Lake lap
GNSS test ride: Lake lap
GNSS test ride: Turning point
GNSS test ride: Turning point

Telephone and call quality

We liked the Oppo Find X3 Pro's voice quality in the test. When held to the ear, intelligibility is very good in both directions. Only very loud ambient noise causes slight distortions in the Oppo user's voice, but they're almost completely filtered out. The speaker has a comparatively long range, but the user's voice is picked up in a nasally manner, and reverberations are audible at a slightly longer distance.

The Find X3 Pro has room for two nano SIM cards, and an eSIM can also be used as an alternative. However, this only worked when setting up the smartphone at the time of our test; the corresponding menu item is still missing in the settings. Oppo plans to fix this soon via an update, though. Furthermore, VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling are supported. 

Cameras - Good quad-camera setup in the Oppo smartphone

Selfie taken with the Find X3 Pro
Selfie taken with the Find X3 Pro

The front-facing camera of the Oppo Find X3 Pro has a resolution of 32 MP, but it doesn't use pixel-binning, so that quite large selfies can be taken. The picture quality is decent, and in addition to AR stickers, it also offers a variety of settings to optimize the user's appearance.

The real highlight is the quad-camera setup on the back, which is equipped with two main sensors. These are available for wide-angle and ultra wide-angle shots, but only the former can make use of optical image stabilization. The latter can convince with good imaging performance in daylight, but it does a lot of sharpening; but it doesn't overdo it as much when it comes to depth, so that the depth of field looks more homogeneous than with Samsung, for example. In return, the subjects look more saturated.

The telephoto lens offers a 2x optical magnification and a 5x hybrid zoom. As expected, the P40 Pro has the lead in comparison due to its periscope zoom. However, Oppo doesn't need to shy away from being compared with the Galaxy S21 Ultra, but it's less powerful since it only offers a maximum digital magnification of 20x.

In return, the Find X3 Pro delivers exceptional close-ups with its microscope camera. Although the lens can only use ambient light, magnifications are captured amazingly clearly. For this, however, the respective subject has to be as flat as possible, because this will result in blurry areas very quickly otherwise. Overall, however, we were surprised by how well the lens works.

A further highlight that Oppo advertises is the 10-bit rendering of photos, which enables broader color reproduction and smoother color transitions as a result. But this has to be enabled in the settings first, because the HEIF format has to be used to take photos with a 10-bit color depth. 

Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD at up to 60 frames per second at best, but it's only possible to switch between the different lenses to a limited extent, and even Expert mode doesn't change anything in this regard. Furthermore, videos can also be created with the main and front-facing cameras simultaneously. The latter only supports 1080p.

Microscope photo: Tablecloth
Microscope photo: Flower soil
Microscope photo: Leaf
Microscope photo: Subpixel structure of an OLED panel

Microscope photos

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angleWide angleUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light
ColorChecker
6.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
10 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X3 Pro: 5.65 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 10.05 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
38.8 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
59.1 ∆E
49.7 ∆E
33.9 ∆E
36.7 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
61.2 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
46.8 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
70.3 ∆E
40.8 ∆E
41.5 ∆E
72.1 ∆E
67.5 ∆E
50.5 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X3 Pro: 43.9 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 72.06 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - VOOC charger included

What were standard accessories last year are already considered a generous inclusion in 2021; in this way, the Oppo Find X3 Pro comes with a 65-watt modular power adapter, a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C), a USB headset, a silicon case, and a SIM tool.

There is a 24-month warranty, and it can't be extended.

Input devices and handling - Find X3 Pro without innovations

Like the predecessor, the Oppo Find X3 Pro relies on an optical fingerprint scanner under the display for biometric security. It reliably unlocks the smartphone and takes the user directly to the home screen or the last opened app. Alternatively, 2D facial recognition is available, which is less secure. However, it can also be specified in its settings whether face unlocking with closed eyes is allowed to happen and whether the lock screen should be shown after the unlocking process.

The capacitive touchscreen operates with a sampling rate of up to 240 Hz and responds quickly and reliably to inputs. Google's GBoard is preinstalled as keyboard app, but it can also be replaced with another variant from the Play Store. The physical buttons have a short, crisp travel with a clear pressure point.

Display - LTPO will be added via an update

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The AMOLED display of the Oppo Find X3 Pro supports a dynamic refresh rate of up to 120 Hz, HDR10+, and a 1440p resolution. With the ambient light sensor enabled, the maximum brightness and its distribution are very good. When the sensor is deactivated, the maximum brightness is 483 cd/m². We measured 854 cd/m² with an even distribution of bright and dark areas (APL50). The LTPO function is supposed to allow a more flexible adjustment of the refresh rate from 1 to 120 Hz, but it will be added via an update. Oppo was unable to name an exact release date for this.

The Find X3 Pro isn't immune to the typical flickering of OLED displays. Above a brightness level of 16%, however, the amplitude curve is quite flat and the frequency almost uniform. Below that, the latter fluctuates strongly at around 179 to 362 Hz and can lead to complaints in sensitive users. Moreover, a DC-dimming mode is no longer available.

OLED flickering below 16% (178.6 - 362.3 Hz)
OLED flickering below 16% (178.6 - 362.3 Hz)
OLED flickering between 17% and 51% (347.2 - 373.1 Hz)
OLED flickering between 17% and 51% (347.2 - 373.1 Hz)
OLED flickering above 51% (357.1 - 367.6 Hz)
OLED flickering above 51% (357.1 - 367.6 Hz)
774
cd/m²
760
cd/m²
781
cd/m²
769
cd/m²
759
cd/m²
789
cd/m²
767
cd/m²
771
cd/m²
811
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 811 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 775.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.33 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 759 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
98.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Oppo Find X3 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3200x1440, 6.80
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
OLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
OLED, 2778x1284, 6.70
Oppo Find X2 Pro
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.70
Screen
-36%
7%
-6%
-179%
Brightness middle
759
910
20%
779
3%
855
13%
778
3%
Brightness
776
913
18%
779
0%
857
10%
775
0%
Brightness Distribution
94
98
4%
96
2%
98
4%
99
5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
2
-150%
0.8
-0%
1.1
-38%
4.4
-450%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
3.1
-72%
1.4
22%
2.51
-39%
8.7
-383%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
2.2
-38%
1.4
12%
1.4
12%
5.6
-250%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.06 107%
2.25 98%
2.187 101%
2.26 97%
CCT
6512 100%
6512 100%
6250 104%
6337 103%
7250 90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 362.3 Hz ≤ 16 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 362.3 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 16 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 362.3 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21103 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The color reproduction of the Find X3 Pro is much improved, and it delivers very good Delta E values in our measurements with CalMAN. However, these are only achieved when the Gentle color profile is selected, which uses the smaller sRGB color space and displays fewer colors as a result. A good alternative is the Cinematic mode, which offers a barely cooler reproduction but covers the larger DCI-P3 color space almost completely. The preset color mode shows a high color temperature with a correspondingly cool reproduction.

Grayscales (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscales (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Mixed colors (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (profile: Gentle, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (profile: Vivid, target color space: DCI-P3)
Color space (profile: Vivid, target color space: DCI-P3)
Color space (profile: Cinematic, target color space: DCI-P3)
Color space (profile: Cinematic, target color space: DCI-P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.6 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

The Oppo Find X3 Pro performs excellently outdoors; it always remains easy to view due to its high brightness potential.

The viewing-angle stability is also really good. We hardly noticed a brightness drop even at very flat viewing angles, and we weren't able to detect color fogging, which is typical for many OLEDs.

Outdoors
Outdoors
Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability

Performance - Oppo smartphone with Snapdragon 888

The Oppo Find X3 Pro is equipped with a cutting-edge Snapdragon 888 with 12 GB of LPDDR5 RAM, which promises more than enough performance resources for the future as well. The integrated Adreno 660 takes care of graphics processing.

While pure CPU performance is only minimally faster compared to the predecessor, the benchmarks show considerable improvements in GPU performance. The Oppo phone delivers the expected results in the comparison field and is currently one of the fastest Android smartphones in all areas.

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1123 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1106 Points ∼83% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
911 Points ∼69% -19%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
1326 Points ∼100% +18%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
911 Points ∼69% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (989 - 1156, n=21)
1121 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1755, n=257, last 2 years)
610 Points ∼46% -46%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3535 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
3583 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3356 Points ∼93% -5%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3476 Points ∼97% -2%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3360 Points ∼93% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3379 - 3810, n=21)
3599 Points ∼100% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4914, n=257, last 2 years)
2063 Points ∼57% -42%
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4415 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6252 Points ∼100% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3011 Points ∼48% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3894 - 6176, n=20)
4777 Points ∼76% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 7701, n=157, last 2 years)
2289 Points ∼37% -48%
OpenCL Score 5.3 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
4656 Points ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
7400 Points ∼100% +59%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3199 Points ∼43% -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3100 - 4764, n=20)
4582 Points ∼62% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (255 - 7514, n=158, last 2 years)
2325 Points ∼31% -50%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14242 Points ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
16741 Points ∼100% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
14989 Points ∼90% +5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13360 Points ∼80% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (11823 - 18942, n=7)
14555 Points ∼87% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=182, last 2 years)
10125 Points ∼60% -29%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11262 Points ∼78%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼100% +28%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12596 Points ∼88% +12%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11387 Points ∼79% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10231 - 15027, n=9)
12332 Points ∼86% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=228, last 2 years)
8099 Points ∼56% -28%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8768 Points ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
9245 Points ∼92% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9760 Points ∼97% +11%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
8333 Points ∼83% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9616 Points ∼96% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (8257 - 11302, n=15)
10026 Points ∼100% +14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=257, last 2 years)
4344 Points ∼43% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
13647 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
13273 Points ∼60% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12779 Points ∼58% -6%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
22052 Points ∼100% +62%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12573 Points ∼57% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (10491 - 16863, n=15)
14739 Points ∼67% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 31940, n=257, last 2 years)
5613 Points ∼25% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
3895 Points ∼72%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4483 Points ∼83% +15%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5384 Points ∼100% +38%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
2622 Points ∼49% -33%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5209 Points ∼97% +34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3562 - 5344, n=15)
4792 Points ∼89% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (640 - 5784, n=255, last 2 years)
3056 Points ∼57% -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
9540 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
8345 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7817 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
7294 Points ∼76% -24%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7982 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (6110 - 9839, n=16)
8738 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9839, n=259, last 2 years)
3570 Points ∼37% -63%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
12394 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10794 Points ∼87% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9302 Points ∼75% -25%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
11824 Points ∼95% -5%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9345 Points ∼75% -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (7930 - 12914, n=16)
11691 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 16221, n=259, last 2 years)
4176 Points ∼34% -66%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5283 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
4651 Points ∼88% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5012 Points ∼95% -5%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
3115 Points ∼59% -41%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5187 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (2579 - 5366, n=16)
4723 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (626 - 5793, n=259, last 2 years)
3090 Points ∼58% -42%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5657 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5756 Points ∼100% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3789 Points ∼66% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3958 - 5942, n=20)
5653 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 9680, n=124, last 2 years)
3065 Points ∼53% -46%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
5721 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
5873 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3826 Points ∼65% -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (3959 - 5925, n=20)
5574 Points ∼95% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (174 - 11700, n=121, last 2 years)
3181 Points ∼54% -44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
60 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
104 fps ∼87% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
119 fps ∼100% +98%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼50% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (60 - 143, n=15)
103 fps ∼87% +72%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=202, last 2 years)
63.4 fps ∼53% +6%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
230 fps ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
154 fps ∼49% -33%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
205 fps ∼65% -11%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
313.8 fps ∼100% +36%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
202 fps ∼64% -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (173 - 290, n=15)
248 fps ∼79% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 417, n=202, last 2 years)
120 fps ∼38% -48%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼63% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
109 fps ∼100% +98%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59.8 fps ∼55% +9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
58 fps ∼53% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (55 - 120, n=15)
92.3 fps ∼85% +68%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=201, last 2 years)
50.7 fps ∼47% -8%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
127 fps ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
117 fps ∼69% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
125 fps ∼73% -2%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
170.4 fps ∼100% +34%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
123 fps ∼72% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (101 - 177, n=15)
143 fps ∼84% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 229, n=202, last 2 years)
69.9 fps ∼41% -45%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
36 fps ∼46%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
51 fps ∼65% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
78 fps ∼100% +117%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
59 fps ∼76% +64%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
45 fps ∼58% +25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (36 - 105, n=15)
70.9 fps ∼91% +97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=200, last 2 years)
39.5 fps ∼51% +10%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
93 fps ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
74 fps ∼70% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼81% -8%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
106 fps ∼100% +14%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼81% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (69 - 121, n=15)
98.9 fps ∼93% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 151, n=200, last 2 years)
48 fps ∼45% -48%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼61%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
30 fps ∼65% +7%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼100% +64%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
42.9 fps ∼93% +53%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
26 fps ∼57% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (26 - 61, n=15)
45 fps ∼98% +61%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.3 - 61, n=199, last 2 years)
24.8 fps ∼54% -11%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
55 fps ∼73%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
58 fps ∼77% +5%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
52 fps ∼69% -5%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
75 fps ∼100% +36%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼68% -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (42 - 72, n=15)
59.5 fps ∼79% +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.8 - 96.6, n=199, last 2 years)
28.9 fps ∼39% -47%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
38 fps ∼69%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
37 fps ∼67% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
47 fps ∼85% +24%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
53.5 fps ∼97% +41%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
28 fps ∼51% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (32 - 73, n=20)
55.1 fps ∼100% +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 73, n=268, last 2 years)
25 fps ∼45% -34%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
72 fps ∼85%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
69 fps ∼81% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
55 fps ∼65% -24%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
85 fps ∼100% +18%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼62% -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (46 - 87, n=21)
71 fps ∼84% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.95 - 257, n=268, last 2 years)
29.4 fps ∼35% -59%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
25 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
26 fps ∼65% +4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
31 fps ∼78% +24%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
40 fps ∼100% +60%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
18 fps ∼45% -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (25 - 46, n=20)
37.4 fps ∼94% +50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 60, n=269, last 2 years)
16.8 fps ∼42% -33%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
28 fps ∼93%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
28 fps ∼93% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
21 fps ∼70% -25%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
30 fps ∼100% +7%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼67% -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (19 - 32, n=20)
27.7 fps ∼92% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.35 - 101, n=269, last 2 years)
11.4 fps ∼38% -59%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
673630 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
633158 Points ∼93% -6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
577725 Points ∼85% -14%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
Apple A14 Bionic, A14 Bionic GPU, 6144
510245 Points ∼75% -24%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
599843 Points ∼88% -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (569595 - 740847, n=11)
683568 Points ∼100% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=176, last 2 years)
352957 Points ∼52% -48%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
6822 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6247 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6402 Points ∼94% -6%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5540 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5908 - 6959, n=15)
6507 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (615 - 8124, n=188, last 2 years)
3889 Points ∼57% -43%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
11438 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
10936 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9545 Points ∼83% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9555 Points ∼84% -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9696 - 11774, n=15)
10888 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 19657, n=188, last 2 years)
7051 Points ∼62% -38%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
8220 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
6588 Points ∼80% -20%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6894 Points ∼84% -16%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6350 Points ∼77% -23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (5352 - 9044, n=15)
7341 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (522 - 9044, n=188, last 2 years)
4581 Points ∼56% -44%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
14211 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
14362 Points ∼100% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11765 Points ∼82% -17%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11496 Points ∼80% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (9399 - 15739, n=15)
13581 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (349 - 25642, n=188, last 2 years)
6188 Points ∼43% -56%
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 12288
1621 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Samsung Exynos 2100 5G, Mali-G78 MP14, 12288
1471 Points ∼68% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2169 Points ∼100% +34%
Oppo Find X2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1351 Points ∼62% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
  (1434 - 1983, n=15)
1699 Points ∼78% +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=188, last 2 years)
1321 Points ∼61% -19%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
375.22 Points ∼100% +169%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (119 - 210, n=14)
167 Points ∼45% +20%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
139.44 Points ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
127.31 Points ∼34% -9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
114.65 Points ∼31% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 414, n=187, last 2 years)
99.8 Points ∼27% -28%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
191 Points ∼100% +48%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (103 - 166, n=13)
140 Points ∼73% +9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
132 Points ∼69% +2%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
129 Points ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra (Mi Browser V12)
117 Points ∼61% -9%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
100 Points ∼52% -22%
Average of class Smartphone (20 - 252, n=193, last 2 years)
83.1 Points ∼44% -36%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
58632 Points ∼100% +110%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (23491 - 46075, n=15)
34811 Points ∼59% +25%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
27914 Points ∼48%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
27275 Points ∼47% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra (Mi Browser V12)
23849 Points ∼41% -15%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
22976 Points ∼39% -18%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 64222, n=200, last 2 years)
19512 Points ∼33% -30%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (414 - 29635, n=202, last 2 years)
3648 ms * ∼100% -122%
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra (Mi Browser V12)
2657.4 ms * ∼73% -61%
Oppo Find X2 Pro (Chrome 80)
2043.6 ms * ∼56% -24%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra (Chrome 88)
1785.6 ms * ∼49% -8%
Oppo Find X3 Pro (Chrome 89)
1645.9 ms * ∼45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G (919 - 1841, n=15)
1368 ms * ∼38% +17%
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max (Safari 14)
467 ms * ∼13% +72%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 UltraXiaomi Mi 10 UltraOppo Find X2 ProAsus ROG Phone 5Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
15%
-13%
-16%
4%
-1%
-50%
Sequential Read 256KB
1778.9
1710.18
-4%
1674.23
-6%
1605.6
-10%
1778.64
0%
1768 ?(1330 - 2037, n=25)
-1%
831 ?(45.6 - 2037, n=273, last 2 years)
-53%
Sequential Write 256KB
759.29
1077.13
42%
739.74
-3%
728.72
-4%
794.64
5%
825 ?(552 - 1559, n=25)
9%
377 ?(11.9 - 1321, n=273, last 2 years)
-50%
Random Read 4KB
273.33
316.7
16%
209.92
-23%
202.63
-26%
291.38
7%
253 ?(181 - 325, n=25)
-7%
146 ?(13.5 - 325, n=273, last 2 years)
-47%
Random Write 4KB
267.15
279.54
5%
219.47
-18%
204.98
-23%
278.05
4%
258 ?(180 - 370, n=25)
-3%
136 ?(5.5 - 330, n=273, last 2 years)
-49%

Games - Only a few high frame-rate titles

In terms of performance, the Oppo Find X3 Pro has no problem running any game. The touchscreen's high touch latency ensures quick input implementation, and the two speakers provide appealing audio.

In demanding titles like PUGB Mobile, the UHD setting can be selected, and no micro stuttering is noticeable even then. Despite the 120 Hz display, however, only a few games take advantage of the high refresh rate. Armajet, for example, offers 120 Hz, but the game still only runs at 60 FPS. The older Dead Trigger 2, on the other hand, dynamically adjusts the rate up to 120 FPS.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Armajet with Oppo Game Space
Armajet with Oppo Game Space

Emissions - The Find X3 Pro can get really hot

Temperature

The Oppo Find X3 Pro's surface temperatures can be quite high under load and exceeded 41 °C (~106 °F) in some places in the test. These values aren't problematic, but they can become uncomfortable to the touch in the long run.

Oppo doesn't manage to keep performance constant in the long run, either. After the sixth run of the 3DMark Wild Life stress test, performance drops repeatedly and fluctuates between 3,500 and 4,500 points.

3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 % ∼100% +77%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94.2 (5375min - 5708max) % ∼95% +68%
Asus ROG Phone 5
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.1 (4785min - 5690max) % ∼85% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.7 (22.3min - 34.4max) % ∼65% +16%
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Mali-G78 MP14, Exynos 2100 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64.4 (3633min - 5645max) % ∼65% +15%
Oppo Find X3 Pro
Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 (3164min - 5648max) % ∼56%
Max. Load
 40.8 °C
105 F
39.9 °C
104 F
38.4 °C
101 F
 
 40.6 °C
105 F
41.2 °C
106 F
38.9 °C
102 F
 
 41.1 °C
106 F
40.5 °C
105 F
38 °C
100 F
 
Maximum: 41.2 °C = 106 F
Average: 39.9 °C = 104 F
36.7 °C
98 F
37.9 °C
100 F
40.2 °C
104 F
36.6 °C
98 F
38.3 °C
101 F
40 °C
104 F
36.1 °C
97 F
38 °C
100 F
38.4 °C
101 F
Maximum: 40.2 °C = 104 F
Average: 38 °C = 100 F
Power Supply (max.)  25.7 °C = 78 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 22 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

Speakers

The two speakers in the Oppo Find X3 Pro deliver a decent sound output but lack dynamic range when it comes to mids in particular, which results in a lack of power in the sound.

The sound output via the USB port or Bluetooth is better. The latter supports a wide range of codecs (SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, and LDAC) but not LC3.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.644.52525.532.73129.7264031.130.25034.936.56323.928.98023.630.71002332.212517.331.816018.44520014.445.825013.653.931514.960.640011.964.250010.267.963011.571.380011.672.2100011.973.2125013.276.2160013.276.5200013.277.3250012.778315013.478400013.881.4500014.582.7630013.977.9800014.171.7100001470.41250014.3671600016.252.5SPL25.589.6N0.778.1median 13.8median 71.3Delta0.911.330.825.822.62619.223.721.424.132.83618.624.218.123.715.427.710.739.41756.114.954.313.25812.562.311.565.710.566.89.968.311.971.110.676.213.676.81471.212.972.511.773.512.978.913.180.113.377.113.873.21479.513.574.414.272.51763.425880.675median 13.2median 71.21.27.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X3 ProSamsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X3 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Battery life - Oppo offers diverse charging mechanisms

Energy consumption

The Oppo Find X3 Pro's power consumption has been greatly improved compared with the predecessor, and the battery capacity has increased to 4,500 mAh.

Thanks to the 65-watt in-house fast-charging technology SuperVOOC 2.0, the smartphone can be fully charged within 35 minutes using a cable, and a battery level of 50% is already reached after 12 minutes.

Wireless charging is possible at up to 30 watts, and other products can also use the Find X3 Pro as a charging station via reverse charging. 

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.24 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 1.54 / 1.69 Watt
Load midlight 6.38 / 9.58 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
3687 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
5%
7%
21%
-59%
-1%
4%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
1.06
-14%
0.82
12%
0.8
14%
1.47
-58%
1.042 ?(0.46 - 1.8, n=19)
-12%
0.933 ?(0.12 - 2.5, n=217, last 2 years)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.54
1.19
23%
1.67
-8%
1.5
3%
3.43
-123%
1.552 ?(0.74 - 2.6, n=19)
-1%
1.794 ?(0.65 - 3.94, n=217, last 2 years)
-16%
Idle Maximum *
1.69
1.2
29%
1.69
-0%
1.9
-12%
3.52
-108%
1.719 ?(0.78 - 3.1, n=19)
-2%
2.02 ?(0.69 - 4.01, n=217, last 2 years)
-20%
Load Average *
6.38
6.46
-1%
4.33
32%
3.4
47%
6.2
3%
5.44 ?(4.21 - 6.44, n=19)
15%
4.45 ?(2.1 - 8.4, n=217, last 2 years)
30%
Load Maximum *
9.58
10.76
-12%
9.72
-1%
4.7
51%
10.63
-11%
9.85 ?(5.89 - 11.7, n=19)
-3%
7.32 ?(3.56 - 12.3, n=217, last 2 years)
24%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The Oppo Find X3 Pro achieves good battery life in our real-world Wi-Fi test with the display brightness adjusted (150 cd/m²). Although both the 1440p resolution and high refresh rate are active in the test, it can leave the Android comparison devices behind; it only has to admit defeat to the iPhone 12 Pro Max.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Chrome 89)
12h 37min
Oppo Find X3 Pro
4500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
4500 mAh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
3687 mAh
Oppo Find X2 Pro
4260 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-4%
27%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1408
2611
WiFi v1.3
757
702
-7%
729
-4%
961
27%
654
-14%
Load
304
423
H.264
1310
1356

Pros

+ great display with QHD resolution and 120 Hz
+ fast SoC and storage
+ wide frequency coverage
+ good camera setup

Cons

- storage not expandable
- ColorOS with limiting power management
- optical fingerprint sensor only

Verdict - The Find X3 Pro can convince in the test

In review: Oppo Find X3 Pro. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.
In review: Oppo Find X3 Pro. Test device provided by Oppo Germany.

Oppo has adjusted the Find X3 Pro in the right places compared with the predecessor and turned its flagship smartphone into a competitive premium smartphone. It convinces in the test with its color-accurate and bright OLED display, high system performance, modern communication features, and good battery life. The camera setup with its so far unique microscope lens also delivers a good performance, but it has to put up with a bit of criticism, especially when it comes to videos, and zoom quality could be better too.

The Oppo Find X3 Pro is a strong alternative in the premium segment.

However, we expect a slightly longer update period than the two years promised for a smartphone that costs over 1,000 Euros (~$1,195). At least the security patches should be distributed for a period of three to four years. It's also a pity that microSD support has been omitted and that storage space has been reduced compared with the predecessor.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and availability

At the time of writing, the Oppo Find X3 Pro isn't officially available in the United States, but you can find it on Amazon with 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage for $1,177. This listing is currently available in blue, black, and white. Alternatively, there are some listings of the smartphone on ebay.

Oppo Find X3 Pro - 03/19/2021 v7
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
91%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
55 / 70 → 79%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
92%
Games Performance
65 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
85 / 86 → 99%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 86%
Camera
79%
Average
83%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 11 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Daniel Schmidt
Editor of the original article: Daniel Schmidt - Managing Editor Mobile - 402 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013
As a child I was fascinated by my Commodore 16, and this sparked my enthusiasm for computers. Using my first modem, I surfed the BTX videotext system and later the World Wide Web. I have always been captivated by the latest technologies, and this is especially true for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets. I’ve been part of the Notebookcheck team since 2013 and have also on occasion written for Notebookinfo.de, and I’m looking forward to testing new innovations for our readers. I like to spend my spare time indulging in photography and barbecues and being with my family.
Stephanie Chamberlain
Translator: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 460 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020
I've been fascinated with technology ever since I got my very first Android smartphone, which was quite a while ago. The power packed into such a small footprint still amazes me. Learning to program made my understanding of technology deeper, and at the same time, it expanded my interest to the area of desktop computers and laptops. All this led me to enjoy reading and watching reviews of new devices, and that's how I stumbled upon Notebookcheck. I immediately found their reviews to be very comprehensive, and luckily, I've even had the chance of translating them since 2019. When it comes to the huge field of technology, I'm currently also interested in specializing in Java programming.
contact me via: LinkedIn
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oppo Find X3 Pro review: The smartphone with the microscope camera
Daniel Schmidt, 2021-03-21 (Update: 2021-03-21)