Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarOppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review - Model confusion at Oppo
Oppo launched the Reno3 models in China towards the end of last year. However, the international variants of the Reno3 series, which appeared in March 2020, had completely different specifications. Nevertheless, users in Europe also benefit from the "Chinese" Oppo Reno3 Pro, because the Chinese manufacturer is introducing the identical sister model in Germany with the Find X2 Neo - the same design and the same specifications as the Chinese version of the Oppo Reno3 Pro.
The Oppo Find X2 Neo, which uses the Snapdragon 765G and a 6.5-inch OLED panel, is available in Germany with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB of internal memory for an RRP of 699 Euros (~$784).
Comparison devices
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.5 % | 07/2020 | Oppo Find X2 Neo SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 84 % | 06/2020 | Oppo Reno3 Pro SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 171 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.8 % | 05/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2340x1080 | |
| 86.1 % | 06/2020 | realme X50 Pro SD 865, Adreno 650 | 205 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.44" | 2400x1080 | |
| 88.4 % | 06/2020 | OnePlus 8 SD 865, Adreno 650 | 180 g | 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 82 % | 02/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
Case - Oppo smartphone with punch-hole design
Just like the Oppo flagship Find X2 Pro, the front of the X2 Neo is made of Corning Gorilla Glass Gen 6, and thanks to the thin display frame almost 90% of the front consists of the OLED panel.
The workmanship of the case is on a very good level. The controls sit firmly in the frame and have well-defined pressure points. However, the thin metal frame is quite sharp, which has a noticeably negative impact on the feel of the Find X2 Neo. The Oppo smartphone also has no protection against dust and water.
Features - Oppo Find X2 Neo without an SD card slot
Video content on streaming services can be viewed in HD quality on the mid-range smartphone, as Widevine is designated as Level 1. The internal UFS memory in our test device has a capacity of 256 GB, but only according to the 2.1 standard. There is no possibility to expand the memory; however, external storage devices can be connected via the USB 2.0 connection using the USB OTG feature.
Software - Find X2 Neo with Android 10
Google's Android version 10 is preinstalled on the Find X2 Neo, which is supplemented by Oppo's own ColorOS 7 user interface. The security updates are current as of May 2020 at the time of our test.
Communication and GPS - Oppo smartphone with only Wi-Fi 5
Thanks to the IEEE 802.11 standard, the integrated WLAN module transmits according to a/b/g/n/ac in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency ranges. The transmission speed between the Oppo smartphone and our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12 is at a good level. However, the transmission rates of the Wi-Fi 6 sister models OnePlus 8 and realme X50 Pro cannot be matched.
The single-SIM smartphone supports the new 5G standard for mobile data connections, but the high number of LTE frequency bands that the Find X2 Neo supports are also positive. For local use (in Germany) there are no corners cut.
The Find X2 Neo can communicate with peripheral devices via NFC chip or Bluetooth 5.1 and is therefore well-equipped for wireless communication.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Average of class Smartphone (16.9 - 1368, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (32.7 - 953, n=69, last 2 years) | |
In order to be able to estimate the location accuracy of our test device in practice, we simultaneously recorded a route with the Garmin Edge 500 GPS bike computer. The determined deviations of the GPS module in the Find X2 Neo are small. About 130 meters lies between the Oppo smartphone and the Garmin navigation system at the end of our 12-kilometer test route. Navigation with the Oppo mobile phone is possible without any problems.
Telephony and Call Quality - Oppo Find X2 Neo with Wi-Fi calling
When it comes to telephony, the Oppo cell phone can use Wi-Fi Calling. We do not find a VoLTE option in the settings, but it is generally available on request from Oppo Germany. The voice quality is good and unremarkable. Voices are reproduced clearly and are also characterized as clear by our conversation partner. Video calls via Skype also work without any problems.
Cameras - Oppo smartphone with quad-cam system
The 48-megapixel IMX586 sensor of the main camera impresses with good detail and high dynamics in daylight. However, the Find X2 Neo has problems with exposure in difficult lighting situations and the image sharpness could also be a bit higher overall. In the dark, the known weaknesses of the Sony sensor are also evident in the Oppo phone. Low-light shots are poorly lit, grainy, and they are not very sharp.
Videos can be recorded with the IMX586 in UHD resolution, but only at 30 fps.
As with the real X50 Pro, we don't like the shots with the 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera of the Oppo smartphone. Noise can be seen even in daylight, and complex subjects are sometimes artificial and over-sharpened.
Shots from the front camera are detailed and the sharpness is okay. However, the 32 MP camera already has massive exposure problems when the sky is cloudy.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
WeitwinkelLowLightWeitwinkel5-fach-ZoomUltraweitwinkel
Accessories and warranty - Find X2 Neo with protective cover and headset
The Find X2 Neo comes with a modular 30-watt power supply, a USB cable, headphones and a silicone protective cover.
The guarantee is 24 months from the date of purchase.
Input devices & handling - Oppo smartphone with 180 Hz sampling rate
Input on the 6.5-inch OLED panel works out quickly and accurately. The built-in vibration motor is satisfactory but not at the high level of a Xiaomi Mi 10 and the haptic feedback is not very punchy.
The Find X2 Neo has an optical fingerprint sensor below the display glass as well as biometric authentication via 2D face recognition using the front camera. Both versions unlock the Oppo phone reliably and also quite quickly. Similar to the realme X50 Pro, the fingerprint sensor is deactivated (also during the measurement) as soon as a user is recognized by the front camera, which can be perceived as annoying in everyday use.
Display - Bright OLED panel in the Find X2 Neo
The 6.5 inch OLED panel of the Oppo mobile phone has a refresh rate of up to 90 Hz and achieves a pixel density of a good 400 ppi with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels. This ensures sufficiently sharp display content when viewed from normal distances.
The Find X2 Neo uses OLED-typical PWM to regulate the luminance with a frequency of 184 to 370 Hz - a DC dimming mode is available. The maximum luminance we measured of over 800 cd/m² is very good and the realistic APL50 test (Average Picture Level) with evenly distributed light and dark areas shows an excellent maximum brightness of 995 cd/m² for this price range. With the ambient light sensor deactivated, the Find X2 Pro only achieves 534 cd/m².
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Oppo Find X2 Neo OLED, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Oppo Reno3 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.50 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67 | realme X50 Pro OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44 | OnePlus 8 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -3% | 38% | 14% | 38% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 797 | 601 -25% | 786 -1% | 679 -15% | 778 -2% | 658 -17% |
| Brightness | 807 | 574 -29% | 791 -2% | 690 -14% | 783 -3% | 643 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 96 1% | 97 2% | 95 0% | 93 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.49 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 4.84 10% | 1.1 80% | 3.2 41% | 0.9 83% | 1.8 67% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.2 | 8.26 10% | 2.2 76% | 6.2 33% | 2.2 76% | 4.4 52% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 5.2 19% | 1.8 72% | 4.1 36% | 1.7 73% | 3.8 41% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.276 97% | 2.26 97% | 2.28 96% | 2.25 98% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 7245 90% | 7164 91% | 6315 103% | 6604 98% | 6481 100% | 6255 104% |
| Contrast | 1343 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 370.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 370.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 370.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19046 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
The display color analysis is carried out with the help of a photo spectrometer and the CalMAN software. The deviations in the color (5.4) and grayscale display (6.4) are somewhat high in the factory settings and the color temperature of the panel is also not optimally calibrated.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). | ||
The organic display offers enough brightness even on sunny days to be able to read the screen contents. The viewing-angle stability is excellent and the decrease in brightness is small even with flat viewing angles.
Performance - Oppo phone with Snapdragon 765G
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G in the Find X2 Neo integrates a fast Prime Core with a peak clock of 2.4 GHz. Both the Prime and the Gold Core (2.2 GHz) are Cortex-A76 cores, while the remaining six Cortex-A55 cores are clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Adreno 620 integrated in the Snapdragon 765G forms the graphics subsystem. The G version of the Snapdragon 765 also contains selected Snapdragon gaming functions, such as the Game Smoother or Game Fast Loader.
The system speed is appealing in everyday life and the Snapdragon 765G, in combination with 12 GB of RAM, ensures smooth operation in everyday life. As soon as more is demanded from the processor, the performance drops a bit and stutters in the apps become apparent.
The Oppo smartphone performed well in the benchmarks. However, between the measured values of a Snapdragon 865, e.g. in the Xiaomi Mi 10, and the Find X2 Neo, there is a (very) clear performance gap. The graphics tests in particular are low on the Oppo phone (for the price range).
| Geekbench 5.4 | |
| Single-Core (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (554 - 673, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (119 - 1885, n=240, last 2 years) | |
| Multi-Core (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1520 - 1966, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (473 - 5538, n=240, last 2 years) | |
| OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1178 - 1266, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1124 - 10128, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (1004 - 1192, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (981 - 8475, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (8687 - 11041, n=16) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9875 - 19297, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Oppo Reno3 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (7245 - 9989, n=17) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (5279 - 13282, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (43 - 86, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (22 - 165, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (48 - 97, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (19 - 497, n=186, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (30 - 55, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 161, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (31 - 56, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (9.2 - 331, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (21 - 37, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 143, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (22 - 38, n=15) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (6.2 - 223, n=188, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| OnePlus 8 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (285731 - 332305, n=14) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (101336 - 725649, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (17.3 - 282, n=164, last 2 years) | |
| realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - --- | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (34 - 292, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 74261, n=193, last 2 years) | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80) | |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83) | |
| OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23) | |
| realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
| realme X50 Pro | |
| Average of class Smartphone (414 - 10031, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Oppo Find X2 Neo | Oppo Reno3 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 10 | realme X50 Pro | OnePlus 8 | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 1% | 47% | 68% | 56% | -27% | -11% | 42% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 943 | 967 3% | 1498 59% | 1756 86% | 1707 81% | 890 -6% | 819 ? -13% | 1180 ? 25% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 454.4 | 471.6 4% | 680 50% | 756 66% | 748 65% | 312.8 -31% | 331 ? -27% | 743 ? 64% |
| Random Read 4KB | 160.5 | 153.1 -5% | 207 29% | 229.4 43% | 215 34% | 96.8 -40% | 161.9 ? 1% | 207 ? 29% |
| Random Write 4KB | 143.8 | 146.7 2% | 215.9 50% | 252 75% | 203.9 42% | 101 -30% | 135.1 ? -6% | 217 ? 51% |
Games - Oppo Find X2 Neo with Adreno 620
The Adreno 620 GPU integrated in the Qualcomm SoC enables a long-lasting smooth gaming experience, even with complex 3D games from the Android Play Store. The rendering of current game titles such as Asphalt 9 and PUBG Mobile is relatively consistent, even in high graphics. In the racing game from Gameloft, however, slight drops in the frame rate are noticeable from time to time.
The sensors and the touchscreen of the Find X2 Neo give no cause for criticism.
Emissions - Cool Oppo smartphone
Temperature
The surface temperatures are low in our measurements. At almost 38 °C, the temperature development is very moderate even under load.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.9 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 52.9 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Speakers
The stereo speakers produce an appealing sound at a maximum volume of a good 86 dB (A). The output is characterized by tones from medium frequencies, which should have been a little more linear.
Sound output via headphones is possible either via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.1, and there is no 3.5 mm jack connection.
Oppo Find X2 Neo audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%
Battery management - Find X2 Neo with Flash Charge
Power consumption
Thanks to Super VooC 4.0, the Find X2 Neo fully charges the 4,025 mAh battery with the included 30-watt power supply in an hour.
| Off / Standby |   0.02 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle |  0.8 / 2.21 / 2.23 Watt |
| Load |
3.14 / 5.44 Watt |
    
| |
| Oppo Find X2 Neo 4025 mAh | Oppo Reno3 Pro 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | -18% | -15% | -31% | -8% | -4% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.53 34% | 1 -25% | 0.9 -13% | 0.66 17% | 0.965 ? -21% | 0.883 ? -10% | |
| Idle Average * | 2.21 | 1.46 34% | 1.77 20% | 2.3 -4% | 2.37 -7% | 1.899 ? 14% | 1.487 ? 33% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.23 | 1.52 32% | 1.86 17% | 2.33 -4% | 2.42 -9% | 2.07 ? 7% | 1.701 ? 24% | |
| Load Average * | 3.14 | 3.83 -22% | 4.23 -35% | 3.5 -11% | 6.8 -117% | 3.98 ? -27% | 4.26 ? -36% | |
| Load Maximum * | 5.44 | 8.89 -63% | 9.13 -68% | 7.68 -41% | 7.5 -38% | 6.19 ? -14% | 7.1 ? -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Battery life
The Find X2 Neo lasted almost 12 hours in our WLAN test with an adjusted display brightness. This is a good value that should also get heavy users through the day.
| Oppo Find X2 Neo 4025 mAh | Oppo Reno3 Pro 4025 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 4780 mAh | realme X50 Pro 4200 mAh | OnePlus 8 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G 4500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 | 712 | 893 25% | 662 -7% | 775 9% | 1045 47% | 802 13% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Mid-range at a premium price
On the plus side for the Find X2 Neo is undoubtedly the excellent and very bright 90 Hz AMOLED panel, which makes it easy to use outdoors even in direct sunlight. The design and workmanship are very appealing - except the sharp-edged frame - and the good Snapdragon 765G also ensures a decent performance for the Oppo phone.
With the price point of the Find X2 Neo, a recommendation for the Oppo smartphone is difficult.
However, the Chinese manufacturer is calling up an RRP of almost 700 Euros (~$784) for its mid-range smartphone. In this price segment, buyers can definitely expect premium features, such as an IP rating, Wi-Fi 6 or wireless charging, as well as more powerful hardware, such as a Snapdragon 865, LPDDR5-RAM or UFS 3.0 memory - all of these are missing in the Find X2 Neo. Furthermore, there is also a qualitative deficit in terms of the camera, because especially the pictures with the ultra-wide-angle lens do not do justice for a 700-Euro (~$784) smartphone in 2020.
If you are not afraid of importing from China, you can take a closer look at our review of the Oppo Reno3 Pro.
Oppo Find X2 Neo
-
08/31/2022 v7
Marcus Herbrich
Pricecompare
