Notebookcheck

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review - Model confusion at Oppo

The clone. The Find X2 Neo is almost identical to another model from Oppo. Both have a nice look and mid-range hardware, and an ambitious price tag. Find out how the Oppo smartphone performs in our test here.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Felicitas Krohn (translated by Christian Hintze),
Test Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone

Oppo launched the Reno3 models in China towards the end of last year. However, the international variants of the Reno3 series, which appeared in March 2020, had completely different specifications. Nevertheless, users in Europe also benefit from the "Chinese" Oppo Reno3 Pro, because the Chinese manufacturer is introducing the identical sister model in Germany with the Find X2 Neo - the same design and the same specifications as the Chinese version of the Oppo Reno3 Pro.

The Oppo Find X2 Neo, which uses the Snapdragon 765G and a 6.5-inch OLED panel, is available in Germany with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB of internal memory for an RRP of 699 Euros (~$784).

Oppo Find X2 Neo (Find X2 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G 8 x 1.8 - 2.4 GHz, Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Graphics adapter
Memory
12288 MB 
Display
6.5 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 405 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 90 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 225 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 0 USB 3.1 Gen2, Audio Connections: USB-Type-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: geomagnetic sensor, proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyro sensor, USB-OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G: GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; 3G: WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19; 4G: TD-LTE 38/39/40/41 LTE-FDD 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/66; 5G NSA n40/78 (additional OTA upgrades: 5G NSA 1/3/5/7/28) , LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.7 x 159.4 x 72.4 ( = 0.3 x 6.28 x 2.85 in)
Battery
4025 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (Sony IMX586, 1/2-Zoll, f/1.7 aperture, 6P lens, OIS+EIS)+ 8 MP ultra-wide angle camera (f/2.2 aperture, 5P lens, 115°)+13 MP tele lens (f/2.4 aperture, 5P)+ 2 MP (f/2.4), Camera2 API: Level3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.4 aperture, 5P
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, SIM card pin, headphones, modular power supply, silicone case, USB type-C cable, ColorOS 7, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0,83 W/kg (head), 1,30 kg/W (body), Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS, Galileo, BeiDou, GLONASS, fanless
Weight
171 g ( = 6.03 oz / 0.38 pounds), Power Supply: 90 g ( = 3.17 oz / 0.2 pounds)
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison devices

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83 %
07/2020
Oppo Find X2 Neo
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
84 %
06/2020
Oppo Reno3 Pro
SD 765G, Adreno 620
171 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.5"2400x1080
88 %
05/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10
SD 865, Adreno 650
208 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"2340x1080
86 %
06/2020
realme X50 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
205 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.44"2400x1080
88 %
06/2020
OnePlus 8
SD 865, Adreno 650
180 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080
82 %
02/2020
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
SD 765G, Adreno 620
208 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case - Oppo smartphone with punch-hole design

Just like the Oppo flagship Find X2 Pro, the front of the X2 Neo is made of Corning Gorilla Glass Gen 6, and thanks to the thin display frame almost 90% of the front consists of the OLED panel.

The workmanship of the case is on a very good level. The controls sit firmly in the frame and have well-defined pressure points. However, the thin metal frame is quite sharp, which has a noticeably negative impact on the feel of the Find X2 Neo. The Oppo smartphone also has no protection against dust and water.

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

Size comparison

165.3 mm / 6.51 inch 76.6 mm / 3.02 inch 8.79 mm / 0.3461 inch 208 g0.4586 lbs162.6 mm / 6.4 inch 74.8 mm / 2.94 inch 8.96 mm / 0.3528 inch 208 g0.4586 lbs160.2 mm / 6.31 inch 72.9 mm / 2.87 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 180 g0.3968 lbs158.96 mm / 6.26 inch 74.24 mm / 2.92 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 205 g0.4519 lbs159.4 mm / 6.28 inch 72.4 mm / 2.85 inch 7.7 mm / 0.3031 inch 171 g0.377 lbs159.4 mm / 6.28 inch 72.4 mm / 2.85 inch 7.7 mm / 0.3031 inch 171 g0.377 lbs

Features - Oppo Find X2 Neo without an SD card slot

Video content on streaming services can be viewed in HD quality on the mid-range smartphone, as Widevine is designated as Level 1. The internal UFS memory in our test device has a capacity of 256 GB, but only according to the 2.1 standard. There is no possibility to expand the memory; however, external storage devices can be connected via the USB 2.0 connection using the USB OTG feature.

Software - Find X2 Neo with Android 10

Google's Android version 10 is preinstalled on the Find X2 Neo, which is supplemented by Oppo's own ColorOS 7 user interface. The security updates are current as of May 2020 at the time of our test.

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

Communication and GPS - Oppo smartphone with only Wi-Fi 5

Thanks to the IEEE 802.11 standard, the integrated WLAN module transmits according to a/b/g/n/ac in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency ranges. The transmission speed between the Oppo smartphone and our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12 is at a good level. However, the transmission rates of the Wi-Fi 6 sister models OnePlus 8 and realme X50 Pro cannot be matched.

The single-SIM smartphone supports the new 5G standard for mobile data connections, but the high number of LTE frequency bands that the Find X2 Neo supports are also positive. For local use (in Germany) there are no corners cut.

The Find X2 Neo can communicate with peripheral devices via NFC chip or Bluetooth 5.1 and is therefore well-equipped for wireless communication.  

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
914 (min: 888, max: 928) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
903 (min: 881, max: 916) MBit/s ∼99% +33%
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
894 (min: 864, max: 925) MBit/s ∼98% +32%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
687 (min: 345, max: 697) MBit/s ∼75% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
678 (min: 664, max: 686) MBit/s ∼74%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
639 (min: 556, max: 658) MBit/s ∼70% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 1414, n=562)
267 MBit/s ∼29% -61%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
OnePlus 8
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
937 (min: 466, max: 960) MBit/s ∼100% +49%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
867 (min: 440, max: 907) MBit/s ∼93% +38%
realme X50 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
849 (min: 414, max: 930) MBit/s ∼91% +35%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
634 (min: 526, max: 657) MBit/s ∼68% +1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
628 (min: 294, max: 639) MBit/s ∼67%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Adreno 620, SD 765G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
341 (min: 280, max: 399) MBit/s ∼36% -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 1599, n=562)
253 MBit/s ∼27% -60%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (664-686)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø618 (294-639)
GPS indoors
GPS indoors
GPS outdoors
GPS outdoors

In order to be able to estimate the location accuracy of our test device in practice, we simultaneously recorded a route with the Garmin Edge 500 GPS bike computer. The determined deviations of the GPS module in the Find X2 Neo are small. About 130 meters lies between the Oppo smartphone and the Garmin navigation system at the end of our 12-kilometer test route. Navigation with the Oppo mobile phone is possible without any problems.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo
GPS Oppo Find X2 Neo

Telephony and Call Quality - Oppo Find X2 Neo with Wi-Fi calling

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

When it comes to telephony, the Oppo cell phone can use Wi-Fi Calling. We do not find a VoLTE option in the settings, but it is generally available on request from Oppo Germany. The voice quality is good and unremarkable. Voices are reproduced clearly and are also characterized as clear by our conversation partner. Video calls via Skype also work without any problems.

Cameras - Oppo smartphone with quad-cam system

Shot with the front cam
Shot with the front cam

The 48-megapixel IMX586 sensor of the main camera impresses with good detail and high dynamics in daylight. However, the Find X2 Neo has problems with exposure in difficult lighting situations and the image sharpness could also be a bit higher overall. In the dark, the known weaknesses of the Sony sensor are also evident in the Oppo phone. Low-light shots are poorly lit, grainy, and they are not very sharp.

Videos can be recorded with the IMX586 in UHD resolution, but only at 30 fps.

As with the real X50 Pro, we don't like the shots with the 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera of the Oppo smartphone. Noise can be seen even in daylight, and complex subjects are sometimes artificial and over-sharpened.

Shots from the front camera are detailed and the sharpness is okay. However, the 32 MP camera already has massive exposure problems when the sky is cloudy. 

Ultra-wide-angle
Ultra-wide-angle
Wide-angle
Wide-angle
2x zoom
2x zoom
5x zoom
5x zoom
20x zoom
20x zoom
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

WeitwinkelLowLightWeitwinkel5-fach-ZoomUltraweitwinkel
ColorChecker
28.3 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
41.4 ∆E
54.3 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
31.2 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
27 ∆E
55.9 ∆E
57 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
42.8 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
62.3 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
59.8 ∆E
61.1 ∆E
47 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Neo: 40.29 ∆E min: 13.42 - max: 62.32 ∆E
ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Oppo Find X2 Neo: 8.14 ∆E min: 1.4 - max: 19.33 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Find X2 Neo with protective cover and headset

The Find X2 Neo comes with a modular 30-watt power supply, a USB cable, headphones and a silicone protective cover.

The guarantee is 24 months from the date of purchase.

Input devices & handling - Oppo smartphone with 180 Hz sampling rate

Input on the 6.5-inch OLED panel works out quickly and accurately. The built-in vibration motor is satisfactory but not at the high level of a Xiaomi Mi 10 and the haptic feedback is not very punchy.

The Find X2 Neo has an optical fingerprint sensor below the display glass as well as biometric authentication via 2D face recognition using the front camera. Both versions unlock the Oppo phone reliably and also quite quickly. Similar to the realme X50 Pro, the fingerprint sensor is deactivated (also during the measurement) as soon as a user is recognized by the front camera, which can be perceived as annoying in everyday use. 

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

Display - Bright OLED panel in the Find X2 Neo

Arrangement of the sub-pixels
Arrangement of the sub-pixels
DC dimming mode
DC dimming mode

The 6.5 inch OLED panel of the Oppo mobile phone has a refresh rate of up to 90 Hz and achieves a pixel density of a good 400 ppi with a resolution of 2340x1080 pixels. This ensures sufficiently sharp display content when viewed from normal distances.

The Find X2 Neo uses OLED-typical PWM to regulate the luminance with a frequency of 184 to 370 Hz - a DC dimming mode is available. The maximum luminance we measured of over 800 cd/m² is very good and the realistic APL50 test (Average Picture Level) with evenly distributed light and dark areas shows an excellent maximum brightness of 995 cd/m² for this price range. With the ambient light sensor deactivated, the Find X2 Pro only achieves 534 cd/m². 

790
cd/m²
801
cd/m²
835
cd/m²
793
cd/m²
797
cd/m²
833
cd/m²
791
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
831
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 835 cd/m² Average: 807.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.58 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 797 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.64-98 Ø6
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Oppo Find X2 Neo
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Oppo Reno3 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5
Xiaomi Mi 10
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.67
realme X50 Pro
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.44
OnePlus 8
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
LCD IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
-3%
38%
14%
38%
20%
Brightness middle
797
601
-25%
786
-1%
679
-15%
778
-2%
658
-17%
Brightness
807
574
-29%
791
-2%
690
-14%
783
-3%
643
-20%
Brightness Distribution
95
91
-4%
96
1%
97
2%
95
0%
93
-2%
Black Level *
0.49
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.84
10%
1.1
80%
3.2
41%
0.9
83%
1.8
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.2
8.26
10%
2.2
76%
6.2
33%
2.2
76%
4.4
52%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.4
5.2
19%
1.8
72%
4.1
36%
1.7
73%
3.8
41%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.276 97%
2.26 97%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.22 99%
CCT
7245 90%
7164 91%
6315 103%
6604 98%
6481 100%
6255 104%
Contrast
1343

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 370.4 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 370.4 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 370.4 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17957 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The display color analysis is carried out with the help of a photo spectrometer and the CalMAN software. The deviations in the color (5.4) and grayscale display (6.4) are somewhat high in the factory settings and the color temperature of the panel is also not optimally calibrated.

CalMAN color accuracy (sRGB)
CalMAN color accuracy (sRGB)
CalMAN color space(sRGB)
CalMAN color space(sRGB)
CalMAN grayscale (sRGB)
CalMAN grayscale (sRGB)
CalMAN color saturation (sRGB)
CalMAN color saturation (sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.2 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.1 ms).

The organic display offers enough brightness even on sunny days to be able to read the screen contents. The viewing-angle stability is excellent and the decrease in brightness is small even with flat viewing angles.

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

Performance - Oppo phone with Snapdragon 765G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G in the Find X2 Neo integrates a fast Prime Core with a peak clock of 2.4 GHz. Both the Prime and the Gold Core (2.2 GHz) are Cortex-A76 cores, while the remaining six Cortex-A55 cores are clocked at 1.8 GHz. The Adreno 620 integrated in the Snapdragon 765G forms the graphics subsystem. The G version of the Snapdragon 765 also contains selected Snapdragon gaming functions, such as the Game Smoother or Game Fast Loader.

The system speed is appealing in everyday life and the Snapdragon 765G, in combination with 12 GB of RAM, ensures smooth operation in everyday life. As soon as more is demanded from the processor, the performance drops a bit and stutters in the apps become apparent.

The Oppo smartphone performed well in the benchmarks. However, between the measured values of a Snapdragon 865, e.g. in the Xiaomi Mi 10, and the Find X2 Neo, there is a (very) clear performance gap. The graphics tests in particular are low on the Oppo phone (for the price range).    

Geekbench 5.1 / 5.2
Vulkan Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1192 Points ∼37%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1017 Points ∼31% -15%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2549 Points ∼78% +114%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3259 Points ∼100% +173%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
2663 Points ∼82% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1035 Points ∼32% -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1004 - 1192, n=5)
1082 Points ∼33% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 4043, n=66)
1633 Points ∼50% +37%
OpenCL Score 5.1 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1266 Points ∼41%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1198 Points ∼39% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
2829 Points ∼92% +123%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3067 Points ∼100% +142%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3001 Points ∼98% +137%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1212 Points ∼40% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1178 - 1266, n=5)
1223 Points ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (272 - 4739, n=61)
1759 Points ∼57% +39%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1854 Points ∼54%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1799 Points ∼52% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3309 Points ∼97% +78%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3087 Points ∼90% +67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3427 Points ∼100% +85%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1520 Points ∼44% -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1520 - 1966, n=8)
1792 Points ∼52% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 3531, n=89)
1990 Points ∼58% +7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
620 Points ∼67%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
606 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
910 Points ∼99% +47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
915 Points ∼100% +48%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
919 Points ∼100% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
569 Points ∼62% -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (554 - 673, n=8)
600 Points ∼65% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (124 - 1342, n=89)
567 Points ∼62% -9%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8456 Points ∼64%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8573 Points ∼65% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
10613 Points ∼80% +26%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13202 Points ∼100% +56%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10800 Points ∼82% +28%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
9989 Points ∼76% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (7754 - 9989, n=8)
8461 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 13202, n=490)
5834 Points ∼44% -31%
Work performance score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9955 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
9647 Points ∼49% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11850 Points ∼60% +19%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
19711 Points ∼100% +98%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
13079 Points ∼66% +31%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
10689 Points ∼54% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8730 - 10876, n=8)
9783 Points ∼50% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 19711, n=648)
6373 Points ∼32% -36%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2756 Points ∼70%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
2737 Points ∼69% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3336 Points ∼85% +21%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3947 Points ∼100% +43%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
3763 Points ∼95% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2588 Points ∼66% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2145 - 2893, n=8)
2682 Points ∼68% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4057, n=149)
2636 Points ∼67% -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3147 Points ∼38%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3135 Points ∼38% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8175 Points ∼99% +160%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8263 Points ∼100% +163%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8294 Points ∼100% +164%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3167 Points ∼38% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3059 - 3198, n=8)
3158 Points ∼38% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 8783, n=149)
2916 Points ∼35% -7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3065 Points ∼46%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3037 Points ∼46% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
6182 Points ∼93% +102%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6644 Points ∼100% +117%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6543 Points ∼98% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2978 Points ∼45% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2877 - 3130, n=8)
3030 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6644, n=149)
2626 Points ∼40% -14%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼60%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3381 Points ∼61% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5187 Points ∼94% +57%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5523 Points ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5401 Points ∼98% +64%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
2965 Points ∼54% -10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1898 - 3544, n=8)
3152 Points ∼57% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 5780, n=496)
2175 Points ∼39% -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3569 Points ∼37%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3531 Points ∼37% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9389 Points ∼98% +163%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9567 Points ∼100% +168%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9542 Points ∼100% +167%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3554 Points ∼37% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3448 - 3589, n=8)
3545 Points ∼37% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 9567, n=496)
2075 Points ∼22% -42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3501 Points ∼43%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3497 Points ∼43% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7957 Points ∼97% +127%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +134%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8153 Points ∼99% +133%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3412 Points ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (2934 - 3605, n=8)
3430 Points ∼42% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 8204, n=497)
1926 Points ∼23% -45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3099 Points ∼57%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3440 Points ∼63% +11%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
3973 Points ∼73% +28%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5478 Points ∼100% +77%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5406 Points ∼99% +74%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3198 Points ∼58% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1790 - 3555, n=8)
3128 Points ∼57% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 5765, n=526)
2085 Points ∼38% -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5356 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5223 Points ∼41% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12601 Points ∼98% +135%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12895 Points ∼100% +141%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
12873 Points ∼100% +140%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5367 Points ∼42% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5070 - 5437, n=8)
5313 Points ∼41% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=526)
2762 Points ∼21% -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4621 Points ∼47%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4684 Points ∼47% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8499 Points ∼86% +84%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9910 Points ∼100% +114%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
9850 Points ∼99% +113%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4643 Points ∼47% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3678 - 4893, n=8)
4568 Points ∼46% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10699, n=526)
2321 Points ∼23% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3395 Points ∼67%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3324 Points ∼66% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4813 Points ∼95% +42%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5068 Points ∼100% +49%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4879 Points ∼96% +44%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3256 Points ∼64% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3233 - 3503, n=8)
3338 Points ∼66% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5209, n=576)
2062 Points ∼41% -39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼39%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3251 Points ∼39% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8371 Points ∼100% +157%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8345 Points ∼100% +156%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8288 Points ∼99% +154%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3287 Points ∼39% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3174 - 3321, n=8)
3271 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 8469, n=576)
1735 Points ∼21% -47%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3301 Points ∼45%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3267 Points ∼45% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7190 Points ∼99% +118%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7293 Points ∼100% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
7174 Points ∼98% +117%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3277 Points ∼45% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3187 - 3346, n=8)
3280 Points ∼45% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 7323, n=577)
1658 Points ∼23% -50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3259 Points ∼65%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3357 Points ∼67% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
4196 Points ∼83% +29%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5034 Points ∼100% +54%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
4819 Points ∼96% +48%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3432 Points ∼68% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1689 - 3476, n=8)
3120 Points ∼62% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 5274, n=618)
1924 Points ∼38% -41%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5148 Points ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4976 Points ∼41% -3%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
12234 Points ∼100% +138%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11533 Points ∼94% +124%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11540 Points ∼94% +124%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5115 Points ∼42% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4834 - 5832, n=8)
5152 Points ∼42% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 12494, n=617)
2277 Points ∼19% -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4561 Points ∼51%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4494 Points ∼50% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
8581 Points ∼96% +88%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8947 Points ∼100% +96%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8810 Points ∼98% +93%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
4654 Points ∼52% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3576 - 4693, n=8)
4434 Points ∼50% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 9492, n=620)
1961 Points ∼22% -57%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19658 Points ∼58%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
20054 Points ∼59% +2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
33793 Points ∼100% +72%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
27026 Points ∼80% +37%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23203 Points ∼69% +18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18769 - 23203, n=8)
20317 Points ∼60% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 58293, n=766)
15263 Points ∼45% -22%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
69645 Points ∼48%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
66415 Points ∼46% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
145603 Points ∼100% +109%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
144611 Points ∼99% +108%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
68634 Points ∼47% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (66415 - 69645, n=8)
68420 Points ∼47% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209431, n=764)
25897 Points ∼18% -63%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
44531 Points ∼53%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
43875 Points ∼52% -1%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
Points ∼0% -100%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
83917 Points ∼100% +88%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
72524 Points ∼86% +63%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
47824 Points ∼57% +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (43325 - 47824, n=8)
44809 Points ∼53% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 112989, n=764)
20366 Points ∼24% -54%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
94 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
202 fps ∼98% +115%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
204 fps ∼99% +117%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
207 fps ∼100% +120%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
95 fps ∼46% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (94 - 97, n=6)
95.3 fps ∼46% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=772)
43.9 fps ∼21% -53%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
61 fps ∼68%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
90 fps ∼100% +48%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -2%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼67% -2%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
86 fps ∼96% +41%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (60 - 86, n=6)
64.5 fps ∼72% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=781)
30.5 fps ∼34% -50%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
56 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
123 fps ∼98% +120%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
124 fps ∼99% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
125 fps ∼100% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
54 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (49 - 56, n=6)
54.2 fps ∼43% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=677)
25.8 fps ∼21% -54%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
50 fps ∼57%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
88 fps ∼100% +76%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +20%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼68% +20%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
48 fps ∼55% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (47 - 55, n=6)
50 fps ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=685)
21.8 fps ∼25% -56%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
38 fps ∼43%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
86 fps ∼98% +126%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
86 fps ∼98% +126%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
88 fps ∼100% +132%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
37 fps ∼42% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (37 - 38, n=6)
37.7 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=540)
20.8 fps ∼24% -45%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
34 fps ∼45%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
75 fps ∼100% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +76%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
60 fps ∼80% +76%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
33 fps ∼44% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (32 - 34, n=6)
33.3 fps ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=542)
18.9 fps ∼25% -44%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
13 fps ∼42% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
29 fps ∼94% +123%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
30 fps ∼97% +131%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
31 fps ∼100% +138%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
8.9 fps ∼29% -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.5 - 13, n=8)
11.8 fps ∼38% -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=288)
11.2 fps ∼36% -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.5 fps ∼43%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
8.3 fps ∼42% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
20 fps ∼100% +135%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +135%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
20 fps ∼100% +135%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
13 fps ∼65% +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (8.3 - 13, n=8)
9.63 fps ∼48% +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 101, n=286)
8.07 fps ∼40% -5%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼44% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
46 fps ∼96% +119%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼96% +119%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
48 fps ∼100% +129%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼44% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (20 - 21, n=8)
20.8 fps ∼43% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=292)
16.6 fps ∼35% -21%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
24 fps ∼44%
Oppo Reno3 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
53 fps ∼98% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
53 fps ∼98% +121%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
54 fps ∼100% +125%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
23 fps ∼43% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (23 - 24, n=8)
23.6 fps ∼44% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 257, n=291)
19.3 fps ∼36% -20%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
21 fps ∼40%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
50 fps ∼96% +138%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
51 fps ∼98% +143%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
52 fps ∼100% +148%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
21 fps ∼40% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (21 - 21, n=6)
21 fps ∼40% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=465)
14 fps ∼27% -33%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
19 fps ∼41%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
42 fps ∼91% +121%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
44 fps ∼96% +132%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
46 fps ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
19 fps ∼41% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (18 - 19, n=6)
18.5 fps ∼40% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=469)
12.5 fps ∼27% -34%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
326795 Points ∼55%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
566256 Points ∼95% +73%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
593933 Points ∼100% +82%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
563466 Points ∼95% +72%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
298925 Points ∼50% -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (298925 - 332074, n=6)
318214 Points ∼54% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 607937, n=94)
315184 Points ∼53% -4%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
1412 Points ∼90%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
1276 Points ∼81% -10%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1576 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
1498 Points ∼95% +6%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
1378 Points ∼87% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (1196 - 1462, n=6)
1353 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 1745, n=709)
807 Points ∼51% -43%
Graphics (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
5216 Points ∼44%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
11730 Points ∼100% +125%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11688 Points ∼100% +124%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
11654 Points ∼99% +123%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5087 Points ∼43% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (5087 - 5216, n=6)
5172 Points ∼44% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=709)
2428 Points ∼21% -53%
Memory (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
4856 Points ∼59%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
7450 Points ∼91% +53%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
8204 Points ∼100% +69%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6912 Points ∼84% +42%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
5278 Points ∼64% +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (4556 - 5683, n=6)
5147 Points ∼63% +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 8874, n=709)
1805 Points ∼22% -63%
System (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
6685 Points ∼66%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
9810 Points ∼97% +47%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10147 Points ∼100% +52%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
10021 Points ∼99% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
6870 Points ∼68% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (6069 - 6870, n=6)
6619 Points ∼65% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=709)
3374 Points ∼33% -50%
Overall (sort by value)
Oppo Find X2 Neo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 12288
3931 Points ∼63%
Xiaomi Mi 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 8192
5752 Points ∼93% +46%
realme X50 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
6205 Points ∼100% +58%
OnePlus 8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 12288
5897 Points ∼95% +50%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, Adreno 620, 8192
3990 Points ∼64% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
  (3674 - 4094, n=6)
3933 Points ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6273, n=709)
1716 Points ∼28% -56%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
69.54 Points ∼100% +77%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
53.145 Points ∼76% +35%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
51.341 Points ∼74% +31%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
50.878 Points ∼73% +29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (39.3 - 58.7, n=6)
48.6 Points ∼70% +24%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 140, n=171)
40.2 Points ∼58% +2%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
39.325 Points ∼57%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
118 Points ∼100% +59%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
102 Points ∼86% +38%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
99 Points ∼84% +34%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
80 Points ∼68% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (72 - 101, n=6)
79.8 Points ∼68% +8%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
74 Points ∼63%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=236)
69.8 Points ∼59% -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
realme X50 Pro
23768 Points ∼100% +44%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
22016 Points ∼93% +33%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
18809 Points ∼79% +14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (16523 - 19143, n=6)
18245 Points ∼77% +10%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
16523 Points ∼70%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
15745 Points ∼66% -5%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=767)
7690 Points ∼32% -53%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (1914 - 59466, n=793)
9892 ms * ∼100% -268%
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G (Chrome 80)
2787 ms * ∼28% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2602 - 2835, n=6)
2726 ms * ∼28% -1%
Oppo Find X2 Neo (Chrome 83)
2689.4 ms * ∼27%
OnePlus 8 (Chrome 83)
2538.1 ms * ∼26% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10 (Xiaomi Browser V11.4.23)
2103.5 ms * ∼21% +22%
realme X50 Pro (Chrome 83)
1999.7 ms * ∼20% +26%
realme X50 Pro
0 ms * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

Oppo Find X2 NeoOppo Reno3 ProXiaomi Mi 10realme X50 ProOnePlus 8Xiaomi Redmi K30 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
1%
47%
68%
56%
-27%
-14%
-70%
Random Write 4KB
143.8
146.7
2%
215.95
50%
251.98
75%
203.85
42%
100.99
-30%
119 (22.1 - 172, n=12)
-17%
33.1 (0.14 - 319, n=856)
-77%
Random Read 4KB
160.47
153.1
-5%
207.04
29%
229.38
43%
215
34%
96.8
-40%
160 (127 - 208, n=12)
0%
57.1 (1.59 - 324, n=856)
-64%
Sequential Write 256KB
454.36
471.6
4%
679.51
50%
756.21
66%
747.87
65%
312.76
-31%
329 (228 - 473, n=12)
-28%
122 (2.99 - 911, n=856)
-73%
Sequential Read 256KB
943.1
966.5
2%
1498.15
59%
1756.1
86%
1706.7
81%
889.67
-6%
840 (687 - 967, n=12)
-11%
329 (12.1 - 1802, n=856)
-65%

Games - Oppo Find X2 Neo with Adreno 620

The Adreno 620 GPU integrated in the Qualcomm SoC enables a long-lasting smooth gaming experience, even with complex 3D games from the Android Play Store. The rendering of current game titles such as Asphalt 9 and PUBG Mobile is relatively consistent, even in high graphics. In the racing game from Gameloft, however, slight drops in the frame rate are noticeable from time to time.

The sensors and the touchscreen of the Find X2 Neo give no cause for criticism.

Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
PUBG mobile
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Asphalt 9 Legends

Emissions - Cool Oppo smartphone

Temperature

The surface temperatures are low in our measurements. At almost 38 °C, the temperature development is very moderate even under load.

Max. Load
 37.2 °C
99 F
37.5 °C
100 F
35.9 °C
97 F
 
 37.2 °C
99 F
36.8 °C
98 F
36.2 °C
97 F
 
 37.6 °C
100 F
37.4 °C
99 F
36.5 °C
98 F
 
Maximum: 37.6 °C = 100 F
Average: 36.9 °C = 98 F
34.7 °C
94 F
35.9 °C
97 F
35.8 °C
96 F
34.3 °C
94 F
35.4 °C
96 F
36.5 °C
98 F
34.2 °C
94 F
36.6 °C
98 F
37.1 °C
99 F
Maximum: 37.1 °C = 99 F
Average: 35.6 °C = 96 F
Power Supply (max.)  31.7 °C = 89 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33 °C / 91 F.
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review
Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review

Speakers

Speaker test: Pink Noise
Speaker test: Pink Noise

The stereo speakers produce an appealing sound at a maximum volume of a good 86 dB (A). The output is characterized by tones from medium frequencies, which should have been a little more linear.

Sound output via headphones is possible either via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.1, and there is no 3.5 mm jack connection. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.535.42529.430.63122.829.94025.326.55030.236.36323.326.98021.920.9100192412519.627.8160194120016.142.525018.950.831516.655.840014.359.65001564.763015.268.780014.372.2100014.373.2125014.273.5160014.875.3200014.875.3250014.476.1315014.377.3400014.677.8500014.774.1630014.971800014.967.51000014.6691250014.858.91600015.448.6SPL26.886.3N0.964.6median 14.8median 68.7Delta1.411.532.828.826.228.123.32521.925.52831.119.924.419.122.519.926.116.531.619.644.517.544.317.55113.956.713.961.415.865.215.265.61466.3146713.970.313.473.113.874.514.374.91473.414.572.714.670.914.569.414.768.415.165.41561.914.849.326.583.50.854.8median 14.6median 65.619.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOppo Find X2 NeoXiaomi Mi 10
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Oppo Find X2 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Xiaomi Mi 10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 65%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Battery management - Find X2 Neo with Flash Charge

Power consumption

Thanks to Super VooC 4.0, the Find X2 Neo fully charges the 4,025 mAh battery with the included 30-watt power supply in an hour.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.8 / 2.21 / 2.23 Watt
Load midlight 3.14 / 5.44 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
-18%
-15%
-31%
-21%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
0.8
0.53
34%
1
-25%
0.9
-13%
0.66
17%
1.096 (0.66 - 1.8, n=7)
-37%
0.887 (0.2 - 3.4, n=866)
-11%
Idle Average *
2.21
1.46
34%
1.77
20%
2.3
-4%
2.37
-7%
2.16 (1.58 - 2.55, n=7)
2%
1.754 (0.6 - 6.2, n=865)
21%
Idle Maximum *
2.23
1.52
32%
1.86
17%
2.33
-4%
2.42
-9%
2.42 (1.6 - 2.9, n=7)
-9%
2.04 (0.74 - 6.6, n=866)
9%
Load Average *
3.14
3.83
-22%
4.23
-35%
3.5
-11%
6.8
-117%
4.42 (3.14 - 6.8, n=7)
-41%
4.09 (0.8 - 10.8, n=860)
-30%
Load Maximum *
5.44
8.89
-63%
9.13
-68%
7.68
-41%
7.5
-38%
6.47 (5.2 - 9.2, n=7)
-19%
6.04 (1.2 - 14.2, n=860)
-11%

* ... smaller is better

Battery life

The Find X2 Neo lasted almost 12 hours in our WLAN test with an adjusted display brightness. This is a good value that should also get heavy users through the day.

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
11h 52min
Oppo Find X2 Neo
4025 mAh
Oppo Reno3 Pro
4025 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 10
4780 mAh
realme X50 Pro
4200 mAh
OnePlus 8
4300 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G
4500 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
712
893
25%
662
-7%
775
9%
1045
47%
802
13%

Pros

+ bright 90 Hz OLED panel
+ 12 GB RAM/256 GB UFS storage
+ stereo speakers
+ high-quality housing...

Cons

- ...with a sharp-edged frame
- only single SIM/no SD card slot
- no UFS 3.0
- underperforming (for the price range)
- USB 2.0
- wide angle camera
- no Wi-Fi 6, wireless charging, IP rating,
- no e-SIM
- no 4K with 60 FPS

Verdict - Mid-range at a premium price

Oppo Find X2 Neo review. Test unit provided by Oppo Germany.
Oppo Find X2 Neo review. Test unit provided by Oppo Germany.

On the plus side for the Find X2 Neo is undoubtedly the excellent and very bright 90 Hz AMOLED panel, which makes it easy to use outdoors even in direct sunlight. The design and workmanship are very appealing - except the sharp-edged frame - and the good Snapdragon 765G also ensures a decent performance for the Oppo phone.

With the price point of the Find X2 Neo, a recommendation for the Oppo smartphone is difficult.

However, the Chinese manufacturer is calling up an RRP of almost 700 Euros (~$784) for its mid-range smartphone. In this price segment, buyers can definitely expect premium features, such as an IP rating, Wi-Fi 6 or wireless charging, as well as more powerful hardware, such as a Snapdragon 865, LPDDR5-RAM or UFS 3.0 memory - all of these are missing in the Find X2 Neo. Furthermore, there is also a qualitative deficit in terms of the camera, because especially the pictures with the ultra-wide-angle lens do not do justice for a 700-Euro (~$784) smartphone in 2020.

If you are not afraid of importing from China, you can take a closer look at our review of the Oppo Reno3 Pro.

Oppo Find X2 Neo - 06/22/2020 v7
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
50 / 70 → 71%
Weight
91%
Battery
89%
Display
84%
Games Performance
36 / 64 → 56%
Application Performance
76 / 86 → 89%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
80 / 90 → 89%
Camera
67%
Average
78%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Oppo Find X2 Neo smartphone review - Model confusion at Oppo
Marcus Herbrich, 2020-07- 1 (Update: 2020-07- 1)
Marcus Herbrich
Editor of the original article: Marcus Herbrich - Editor
My great passion has always been mobile technologies, especially smartphones. As a technology enthusiast, the half-life of my devices is not exactly high and the latest hardware is just good enough - manufacturer or operating system plays a minor role, the main thing is state-of-the-art
Christian Hintze
Translator: Christian Hintze - Editor
Because of my interest in computer games I started studying computer science, became a psychologist, but stayed true to the games and the hardware. For example during my year abroad in London as a games tester at Sega. In my spare time I find a balance between PC games and sports (meanwhile mainly indoor soccer and running after my toddler), playing guitar and building bamboo bikes (well, so far only one under guidance).