Notebookcheck

OnePlus 7T Pro Smartphone Review – the fastest charger

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Katherine Bodner), 11/04/2019

Matte outside, shiny inside. Even though OnePlus has placed the focus on the OnePlus 7T: The OnePlus 7T Pro has once again turned out to be a really good smartphone. Its price, however, is slowly creeping up to match its competitors. Does that make it loose its appeal? Find out in our review.

OnePlus 7T Pro

After our high praise for the OnePlus 7 Pro, we all had high expectations for its successor. The OnePlus 7T Pro continues to feature a camera that retracts into the case when not in use, which enables the device to have a notch-free display with narrow bezels. OnePlus has also continued to improve a lot of details, although the manufacturer has difficulty highlighting the advantages of the significantly more expensive OnePlus 7T Pro compared to the already very good OnePlus 7T. The 7T Pro is being sold for around $1000, which places it in the same price range of high-end smartphones. But then again, it also has a lot to offer.

We wanted to find out whether the OnePlus 7T Pro is worth the additional cost compared to the OnePlus 7Thow the flagship fares compared to other high-end phones and whether we can recommend the phone or not. So let's get to it.

OnePlus 7T Pro (7 Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
8192 MB 
Display
6.67 inch 19.5:9, 3120 x 1440 pixel 515 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 256 GB 
, 228 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, Audio Connections: audio output via USB-c, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8/​B9/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B29/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 162.6 x 75.9 ( = 0.35 x 6.4 x 2.99 in)
Battery
4085 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/​1.6, phase detection auto focus, laser auto focus, contrast auto focus, OIS, Dual-LED flash, videos @2160p/​60fps videos @720p/​480fps (camera 1); 16.0MP, f/​2.2, wide-angle lens (camera 2); 8.0MP, f/​2.4, telephoto lens (camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.0, videos @1080p/​30fps, extendable
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: virtual keyboard, quick-gharge AC adaptor, USB cable, case, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, LTE 4×4 MIMO DL Cat18 /UL Cat13 (1.2 Gbps /150 Mbps); SAR value: 1.120 W/kg (body), fanless
Released
10/10/2019
Weight
206 g ( = 7.27 oz / 0.45 pounds), Power Supply: 128 g ( = 4.52 oz / 0.28 pounds)
Price
759 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

Comparison Devices

RatingDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionBest Price
87%11/2019OnePlus 7T Pro
855+, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
87%02/2019Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
9820, Mali-G76 MP12
198 g512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.4"3040x1440
86%05/2019OnePlus 7 Pro
855, Adreno 640
206 g256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.67"3120x1440
89%08/2019Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
855, Adreno 640
191 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.39"2340x1080
87%09/2019Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU
226 g64 GB SSD6.5"2688x1242
86%10/2019OnePlus 7T
855+, Adreno 640
190 g128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash6.55"2400x1080

Case – a matte design for the OnePlus smartphone

The only available color for the OnePlus 7T Pro at the moment is Haze Blue. However, the manufacturer traditionally offers different colors as special editions. The OnePlus 7T Pro McLaren Edition is different again and has its own review. The back of the OnePlus 7T Pro is made of matte glass and has a slight color gradient which makes it look very attractive and feel good. While you can see some fingerprints, they are not as visible as on other models.

The OnePlus has a retractable front camera which means that the display does not need a notch and has very narrow bezels with a display ratio of 93 percent. The rounded corners of the display and back make the smartphone look elegant and slim. It weighs around 206 grams (~7.3 oz), which isn't light for a smartphone, but still 20 grams (~0.71 oz) less than the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

The smartphone is very well made and feels high-quality. It doesn't mind pressure but does creak slightly when we try to warp it.

If you are looking for a smartphone that you can use in damp or dusty environments, you might want to look further: OnePlus does not offer an IP certification and its warranty explicitly excludes damage caused by dampness or dirt. Although the manufacturer repeatedly confirms that it uses the same methods as other manufacturers and that the devices are protected, users will have to rely on the goodwill of the manufacturer in the event of damage. 

OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T
OnePlus 7T

Size Comparison

162.6 mm / 6.4 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs162.6 mm / 6.4 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 206 g0.4542 lbs160.94 mm / 6.34 inch 74.44 mm / 2.93 inch 8.13 mm / 0.3201 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs158 mm / 6.22 inch 77.8 mm / 3.06 inch 8.1 mm / 0.3189 inch 226 g0.4982 lbs156.7 mm / 6.17 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 191 g0.4211 lbs157.6 mm / 6.2 inch 74.1 mm / 2.92 inch 7.8 mm / 0.3071 inch 198 g0.4365 lbs

Connectivity – a lot of storage but no SD card

We doubt that OnePlus will ever grow to like microSD cards - the manufacturer has once again left out a suitable slot on the OnePlus 7T Pro. Considering the large internal storage of 256 GB this should not be an issue for most users. 8 GB of RAM are a top-range feature as well and should easily support several apps running simultaneously.

This model is available for around $1000 with no other storage configurations available at the moment. The price for this configuration has not really increased compared to the OnePlus 7 Pro, but instead the more affordable entry-level version with 128 GB of storage and 6 GB of RAM is no longer available.  

The device has NFC and Bluetooth 5.0 as well as two SIM slots.

Top: extendable front camera, microphone
Top: extendable front camera, microphone
Bottom: speaker, microphone, USB-C port, SIM drawer
Bottom: speaker, microphone, USB-C port, SIM drawer
Right: Standby button, notification slider
Right: Standby button, notification slider
Left: volume rocker
Left: volume rocker

Software – OxygenOS based on Android 10

The OnePlus 7T Pro is delivered with Android 10 and OnePlus' own user interface OxygenOS. OnePlus has made many changes to its look and has even developed its own customization menu in which users can configure effects, contrast colors and the Dark Mode. The latter is a new addition to Android 10, although OxygenOS has been offering it for quite a while now. In general, the OnePlus operating system is easy to handle and offers a lot of customization options. 

The smartphone does not have any bloatware and there are very few preinstalled apps from OnePlus as well: For example, the manufacturer has included the Game Center and the OnePlus Community app.

The manufacturer is known for its regular and fast software updates and our test unit had security patches from September 5, 2019, which is quite recent at the time of testing. The manufacturer guarantees security updates for three years and OS updates for two years for its smartphones.

Software OnePlus 7T Pro
Software OnePlus 7T Pro
Software OnePlus 7T Pro

Communication and GPS – precise localization

The OnePlus 7T Pro cannot keep up with the likes of Samsung or Apple in terms of Wi-Fi speed as tested with our reference router Linksys EA8500 and it does not support the newest Wi-Fi 6 standard (802.11 ax). Nonetheless, it reaches decent speeds and can keep up with other high-end smartphones. The signal strength is good: websites load quickly near the router; you might have to wait for images to load, but this never takes very long. At a distance of 10 meters (~32.8 feet) and through 3 walls the signal strength is still at 4 out of 5 and pages load just as quickly as when the device is next to the router.

OnePlus has been making an effort to create real World Phones, devices that can be used in as many places around the world as possible, for several years now, and the OnePlus 7T Pro is no exception. It supports numerous LTE frequencies which ensure that you should still have a signal even when going on holiday to more exotic places. The LTE reception is very good and we had an LTE connection even between buildings. The phone always had at least half of the bars indoors as well. The LTE connection was tested in urban surroundings with the German D2 network.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
633 (min: 561, max: 684) MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
580 (min: 550, max: 597) MBit/s ∼92% +23%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 347, max: 505) MBit/s ∼74%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
467 (min: 375, max: 519) MBit/s ∼74% -1%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
430 (min: 374, max: 485) MBit/s ∼68% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
383 (min: 242, max: 434) MBit/s ∼61% -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.9 - 939, n=449)
228 MBit/s ∼36% -52%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD
589 (min: 461, max: 625) MBit/s ∼100% +67%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
471 (min: 438, max: 506) MBit/s ∼80% +34%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Mali-G76 MP12, 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
457 (min: 398, max: 508) MBit/s ∼78% +30%
OnePlus 7T
Adreno 640, 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
422 (min: 238, max: 447) MBit/s ∼72% +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Adreno 640, 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
389 (min: 366, max: 444) MBit/s ∼66% +11%
OnePlus 7T Pro
Adreno 640, 855+, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash
352 (min: 311, max: 375) MBit/s ∼60%
Average of class Smartphone
  (9.4 - 703, n=449)
217 MBit/s ∼37% -38%
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø470 (347-505)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø352 (311-375)

The smartphone did not manage to locate us indoors but only needed a moment to position us within 6 meters (~19.7 feet) outside, which is quite decent. The compass and positioning within Google Maps is reliable and fast.

We took the phone on a short bike ride with the professional navigation system Garmin Edge 520 as a comparison device. Our test unit is very precise at recording curves and bends in the road but had some difficulty tracking us while we were cycling down narrow town streets. It was very precise while we crossed the bridge. The OnePlus 7T Pro clearly does a good job when it is out in the open, but the Edge 520 takes the lead in difficult situations. All in all, the OnePlus 7T Pro can definitely be considered a precise navigation system for everyday use.

GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – overview
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – overview
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bend
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bend
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bridge
GPS OnePlus 7T Pro – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – overview
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – curve
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – curve
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge
GPS Garmin Edge 520 – bridge

Telephone and Voice Quality – loud and clear

The OnePlus 7T Pro supports VoLTE and VoWiFi (your provider might not). The telephone software has been adapted by OnePlus but basically has the same layout as the standard Google app. It is available in Dark Mode.

The earpiece in the phone can be very loud, so much so that you might not even have to turn on speakerphone. This also means that people around you might be able to hear the entire conversation when the volume is set to high. The quality of the audio is very good with no distortions even at high volume. However, you can hear some quiet noise in the background. Our voice was transmitted very well via the microphone, both when speaking quietly and loudly. While we continue to hear our call partner clearly on speakerphone, the microphone occasionally picks up some static, although the overall quality is decent nonetheless.

Cameras – Top-of-the-range with 3x zoom

standard
standard

The back of the OnePlus 7T Pro features a camera with a wide-angle lens, a standard lens and a telephoto lens. Unlike the OnePlus 7T, which has almost the same camera set-up, the focal length of the telephoto lens is shorter, which gives you 3x optical zoom.

The main camera can take pictures with 48 MP, although it usually combines four pixels to one large, very light-sensitive pixel, which results in a resolution of 12 MP and should be plenty for most situations. The photos of the main camera are pleasing. They offer a lot of details, good color reproduction and a decent amount of details and sharpness even in bad lighting conditions. The OnePlus 7T Pro offers top-of-the-range camera technology. The night mode improves the quality of photos taken in the dark, although it has to be activated manually, which is a shame. The camera software has an extensive pro mode and content recognition, which can be used for scanning business cards and QR codes, as well as a portrait and panorama mode. 

Videos can be recorded in 4K at 60 fps with great quality. The lighting responds quickly and we are happy with the sharpness and color reproduction even in slightly darker areas. You can record slow-motion videos in 720p with a maximum of 480 images per second and 1080p with 240 images per second. OnePlus claims that the phone can even take 960 images in 720p, but we couldn't find a way to activate that.

The extendable front camera is very impressive. It has a resolution of 16 MP and the pictures taken with it are good in general, although they have slightly fewer details in dark areas.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3

The pictures taken in our lab show that the OnePlus 7T Pro manages to take a decent image even in very dark surroundings and without a flash. The picture could be a little brighter with very good lighting, but we are pleased with the sharpness of details. Writing is a little distorted at the edges. In general, however, the picture is of high quality.

ColorChecker Photo
18.9 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
20 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
22 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T Pro: 21.52 ∆E min: 9.6 - max: 32.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Photo
18.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
20 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
ColorChecker OnePlus 7T Pro: 8.87 ∆E min: 1.73 - max: 20 ∆E
Test chart - perfect lighting
Test chart - perfect lighting
Test chart - 1 lux

Accessories and Warranty - a lot of things to purchase

The OnePlus 7T Pro does not include a headset, but instead users get the large WarpCharge power supply, a fancy red and white charging cable and a protective silicon cover. Of course you can also buy fancy Kevlar cases, rough sandstone covers or simple silicone cases as well as various bundles, for instance including a cover, headphones and an additional charger.

The warranty lasts 24 months. As mentioned above, it does not cover damage caused by water or dust that entered the device.

Input Devices & Handling – OnePlus with slider

The touchscreen of the OnePlus 7T Pro is very fast and responsive. This is partly thanks to the manufacturer choosing good parts, but also due to the 90-Hz image rate of the panel. We tried deactivating the 90 Hz in the settings and immediately noticed that the system responded more slowly. You can tell the difference simply when scrolling or swiping through the menu. The touchscreen is very precise and responds well to inputs at the edges even without the high refresh rate.

Of course the device continues to have a notification slider. OnePlus might have stolen this idea from Apple, but that doesn't make it bad: You can simply set the smartphone to silent or vibration by moving the slider, which is very practical. The only other physical buttons are the standby button and the volume rocker. Both feel high-quality and are easy to find by touch. 

OnePlus has been using gestures instead of the control buttons at the bottom of the display for quite a while and Google has now added this function to Android 10 as well, which is why OnePlus has adjusted its gestures to Google's standard. They are a good alternative, although users that are used to working with the buttons might need some time to get used to the change. Of course, they can also continue using the bar as usual.

Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard portrait mode
Keyboard landscape mode
Keyboard landscape mode

Display – 90-Hz technology and good color reproduction

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The display not only has a refresh rate of 90 Hz, it also has 4K resolution and brilliant colors and a high contrast ratio with HDR10+ thanks to AMOLED technology. The maximum brightness that the display can reach with the brightness sensor activated can't keep up with industry leaders Samsung and Apple, but is still good at 611 cd/m². It also has an even brightness distribution at 95 percent.

The image display is good with a lot of details. Individual pixels are not recognizable with a pixel density of over 500 PPI. The image reproduction can be adjusted manually or using two presets.

609
cd/m²
609
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
597
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
627
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
606
cd/m²
620
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 627 cd/m² Average: 611 cd/m² Minimum: 2.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 606 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.258
OnePlus 7T Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4
OnePlus 7 Pro
AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.67
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.39
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5
OnePlus 7T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Screen
-5%
21%
7%
28%
-7%
Brightness middle
606
710
17%
586
-3%
594
-2%
790
30%
693
14%
Brightness
611
721
18%
584
-4%
607
-1%
790
29%
703
15%
Brightness Distribution
95
97
2%
97
2%
91
-4%
97
2%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.46
3.7
-7%
1.39
60%
1.51
56%
1.4
60%
3.42
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.64
10.3
-83%
2.7
52%
4.27
24%
3.4
40%
6.12
-9%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2
1.5
25%
1.6
20%
2.6
-30%
1.9
5%
3.3
-65%
Gamma
2.258 97%
2.1 105%
2.243 98%
2.219 99%
2.23 99%
2.265 97%
CCT
6779 96%
6611 98%
6672 97%
6390 102%
6466 101%
6799 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 294 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 294 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 294 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9266 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

There is screen flickering due to PWM with a fluctuating frequency and a maximum of 294 Hz. OnePlus offers an experimental function called DC Dimming, which can reduce PWM-related issues for some users. 

The color reproduction in the "vivid" preset was very precise in the predecessor and you will hardly notice a difference to the reference colors at maximum brightness. If you need a good color reproduction, for example for evaluating the colors in photos or videos, this is a good display. There is a minimal blue cast in the grayscales, but this can easily be removed manually via the white balance or the night mode. According to our tests, which should be considered a rough indication due to the missing 3D measurement, the sRGB color space is covered entirely, as is a large part of the DPI P3 color space and 86.5 percent of the AdobeRGB color space. 

The fast response rate makes the display interesting for gamers.

CalMAN grayscales
CalMAN grayscales
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space AdobeRGB
CalMAN color space AdobeRGB
CalMAN color space DCI P3
CalMAN color space DCI P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.6 ms).

There are definitely smartphones that can offer higher brightness levels, at least when bright light is shining onto the brightness sensor. The display of the OnePlus 7T Pro is bright enough to be used outdoors on cloudy days, but users might want to avoid direct sunlight due to the strong reflections.

Thanks to the AMOLED display, the display can be read clearly from every viewing angle. The only reason you might see some difference in colors or brightness is due to the rounded edges.

Viewing angles
Viewing angles
Outdoors
Outdoors

Performance – a lot of power for the OnePlus phone

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ is one of the fastest SoCs currently available. By choosing this chip, OnePlus has given its OnePlus 7T Pro quite an advantage compared to its predecessor as well as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus. However, the difference in performance should not be particularly noticeable during everyday use. The OnePlus 7T Pro is definitely one of the fastest smartphones that you can currently buy and might only be overtrumped by the iPhone 11 Pro Max.

The graphics performance of the OnePlus 7T Pro does not need to fear comparison. It offers the best available performance for games and graphically demanding apps.

Geekbench 5
Vulkan Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2430 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2507 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
2430 Points ∼97% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 2837, n=20)
1677 Points ∼67% -31%
OpenCL Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2716 Points ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4274 Points ∼100% +57%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2707 Points ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2652 - 2716, n=3)
2692 Points ∼63% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (183 - 4593, n=27)
2076 Points ∼49% -24%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2940 Points ∼91%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2306 Points ∼71% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3242 Points ∼100% +10%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2753 Points ∼85% -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (2753 - 2940, n=3)
2878 Points ∼89% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (807 - 3575, n=38)
2018 Points ∼62% -31%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
792 Points ∼59%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
836 Points ∼62% +6%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1344 Points ∼100% +70%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
783 Points ∼58% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (783 - 792, n=3)
789 Points ∼59% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (155 - 1344, n=38)
592 Points ∼44% -25%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10442 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
7812 Points ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9974 Points ∼96% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
9296 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8702 Points ∼83% -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8702 - 10700, n=3)
9948 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2630 - 11440, n=387)
5331 Points ∼51% -49%
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
12645 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
9793 Points ∼77% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
11766 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
11167 Points ∼88% -12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10286 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10286 - 12907, n=3)
11946 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1077 - 14946, n=555)
5782 Points ∼46% -54%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3564 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2488 Points ∼70% -30%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
3317 Points ∼93% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
2657 Points ∼75% -25%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
3489 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (3489 - 3564, n=2)
3527 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 15735, n=67)
2678 Points ∼75% -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6527 Points ∼98%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5530 Points ∼83% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5794 Points ∼87% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5702 Points ∼86% -13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6640 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6527 - 6640, n=2)
6584 Points ∼99% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 14536, n=67)
2745 Points ∼41% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5509 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4348 Points ∼79% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4548 Points ∼82% -17%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5530 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (5509 - 5530, n=2)
5520 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 14786, n=67)
2496 Points ∼45% -55%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4683 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2925 Points ∼62% -38%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4429 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3280 Points ∼70% -30%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4635 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4635 - 4683, n=3)
4667 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (573 - 4683, n=395)
1979 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8006 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5371 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7115 Points ∼89% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6739 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7977 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7977 - 8006, n=3)
7996 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (75 - 8374, n=395)
1788 Points ∼22% -78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6916 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4529 Points ∼65% -35%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6270 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5440 Points ∼79% -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6875 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6875 - 6916, n=3)
6902 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (93 - 6916, n=396)
1659 Points ∼24% -76%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4604 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
3087 Points ∼67% -33%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4352 Points ∼95% -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3288 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4517 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4517 - 4604, n=3)
4575 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (375 - 4703, n=423)
1891 Points ∼41% -59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11448 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4449 Points ∼39% -61%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
10420 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6730 Points ∼59% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
11433 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (11433 - 11448, n=3)
11443 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (70 - 20154, n=423)
2388 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8605 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4052 Points ∼47% -53%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7955 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5460 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8531 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8531 - 8605, n=3)
8580 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (88 - 10427, n=423)
2004 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4519 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2977 Points ∼66% -34%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4063 Points ∼90% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3724 Points ∼82% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
4038 Points ∼89% -11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4492 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4492 - 4519, n=3)
4510 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (486 - 4519, n=475)
1887 Points ∼42% -58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7044 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5186 Points ∼73% -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
6248 Points ∼87% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼88% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
6088 Points ∼85% -14%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
7150 Points ∼100% +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (7044 - 7150, n=3)
7079 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53 - 7150, n=475)
1479 Points ∼21% -79%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6266 Points ∼99%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4452 Points ∼70% -29%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5581 Points ∼88% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5475 Points ∼87% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5471 Points ∼87% -13%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
6319 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (6266 - 6319, n=3)
6284 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 6319, n=476)
1423 Points ∼23% -77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4503 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
2875 Points ∼64% -36%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4091 Points ∼91% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3726 Points ∼83% -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
3839 Points ∼85% -15%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4377 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4377 - 4503, n=3)
4461 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (293 - 4540, n=515)
1752 Points ∼39% -61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10637 Points ∼94%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
5303 Points ∼47% -50%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9845 Points ∼87% -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
6325 Points ∼56% -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
11302 Points ∼100% +6%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10781 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10637 - 10781, n=3)
10685 Points ∼95% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (43 - 11302, n=514)
1937 Points ∼17% -82%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8165 Points ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4465 Points ∼55% -45%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
7501 Points ∼92% -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
5478 Points ∼67% -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
7893 Points ∼97% -3%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8136 Points ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8136 - 8165, n=3)
8155 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (55 - 8165, n=517)
1673 Points ∼20% -80%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
30561 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32302 Points ∼95% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
26936 Points ∼79% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
27278 Points ∼80% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
33898 Points ∼100% +11%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
33697 Points ∼99% +10%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (30561 - 33697, n=3)
31606 Points ∼93% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (735 - 45072, n=675)
14216 Points ∼42% -53%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
118129 Points ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
70318 Points ∼34% -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
106829 Points ∼52% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
103955 Points ∼50% -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
206190 Points ∼100% +75%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
117304 Points ∼57% -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (117304 - 118129, n=3)
117854 Points ∼57% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (536 - 209204, n=673)
22187 Points ∼11% -81%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
72173 Points ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
55740 Points ∼58% -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
64389 Points ∼66% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
63969 Points ∼66% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
96826 Points ∼100% +34%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
75613 Points ∼78% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (72173 - 75613, n=3)
73320 Points ∼76% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (662 - 97276, n=673)
17924 Points ∼19% -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
96 fps ∼33% -48%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
166 fps ∼58% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
167 fps ∼58% -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
287 fps ∼100% +55%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
185 fps ∼64% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (185 - 185, n=2)
185 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.5 - 322, n=694)
38.1 fps ∼13% -79%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
60 fps ∼87%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
58 fps ∼84% -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
60 fps ∼87% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
69 fps ∼100% +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
59 fps ∼86% -2%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼86% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (59 - 60, n=2)
59.5 fps ∼86% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 120, n=703)
28.1 fps ∼41% -53%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
111 fps ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼43% -40%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
101 fps ∼64% -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
90 fps ∼57% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
157 fps ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
112 fps ∼71% +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (111 - 112, n=2)
112 fps ∼71% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.8 - 175, n=600)
21.9 fps ∼14% -80%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
57 fps ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
53 fps ∼88% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
55 fps ∼92% -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +5%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
59 fps ∼98% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (57 - 59, n=2)
58 fps ∼97% +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 115, n=609)
19.4 fps ∼32% -66%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
67 fps ∼67% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
71 fps ∼71% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
62 fps ∼62% -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
100 fps ∼100% +27%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
79 fps ∼79% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (79 - 79, n=2)
79 fps ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.87 - 117, n=466)
17.9 fps ∼18% -77%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
40 fps ∼67%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
37 fps ∼62% -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36 fps ∼60% -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
51 fps ∼85% +28%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
60 fps ∼100% +50%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
58 fps ∼97% +45%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (40 - 58, n=2)
49 fps ∼82% +23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 110, n=468)
16.7 fps ∼28% -58%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
16 fps ∼35% -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
15 fps ∼33% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
17 fps ∼37% 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
46 fps ∼100% +171%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
27 fps ∼59% +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (17 - 27, n=3)
20.3 fps ∼44% +19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.61 - 60, n=188)
10 fps ∼22% -41%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
19 fps ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
17 fps ∼59% -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
16 fps ∼55% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼83% +26%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
29 fps ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
18 fps ∼62% -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (18 - 19, n=3)
18.7 fps ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.21 - 33, n=187)
7 fps ∼24% -63%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
26 fps ∼45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
26 fps ∼45% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
23 fps ∼40% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼62% +38%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
58 fps ∼100% +123%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼71% +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (25 - 41, n=3)
30.7 fps ∼53% +18%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 60, n=192)
14.7 fps ∼25% -43%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
46 fps ∼61% -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼56% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
42 fps ∼56% -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
75 fps ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼63% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 47, n=3)
47 fps ∼63% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 87, n=192)
16.5 fps ∼22% -65%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
48 fps ∼76%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
43 fps ∼68% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
42 fps ∼67% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
36 fps ∼57% -25%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
63 fps ∼100% +31%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
47 fps ∼75% -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (47 - 48, n=2)
47.5 fps ∼75% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.6 - 73, n=391)
12.2 fps ∼19% -75%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
24 fps ∼50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
23 fps ∼48% -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
21 fps ∼44% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼85% +71%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
48 fps ∼100% +100%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
41 fps ∼85% +71%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (24 - 41, n=2)
32.5 fps ∼68% +35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=395)
10.9 fps ∼23% -55%
Basemark GPU
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4528 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
32.26 (min: 8.31, max: 85.07) fps ∼1% -99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
37.3 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
4528 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.24 - 4528, n=63)
88.2 fps ∼2% -98%
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
2850 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
27.18 (min: 8.36, max: 46.5) fps ∼1% -99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
22.73 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
2850 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.57 - 2850, n=56)
64.8 fps ∼2% -98%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4462 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
38.5 (min: 9.69, max: 72.94) fps ∼1% -99%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
36.29 fps ∼1% -99%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
4462 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.88 - 4462, n=53)
101 fps ∼2% -98%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4986 Score ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4967 Score ∼100% 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4969 Score ∼100% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
4986 Score ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 5025, n=60)
2188 Score ∼44% -56%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1236 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
1383 Points ∼79% +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
1364 Points ∼78% +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
1076 Points ∼62% -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
1745 Points ∼100% +41%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
1485 Points ∼85% +20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (1236 - 1485, n=2)
1361 Points ∼78% +10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7 - 9387, n=635)
773 Points ∼44% -37%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10618 Points ∼62%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8401 Points ∼49% -21%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9421 Points ∼55% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
8700 Points ∼51% -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
16996 Points ∼100% +60%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
10611 Points ∼62% 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (10611 - 10618, n=2)
10615 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (18 - 16996, n=635)
2070 Points ∼12% -81%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5091 Points ∼97%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4306 Points ∼82% -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
5243 Points ∼100% +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
3922 Points ∼75% -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
2350 Points ∼45% -54%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4869 Points ∼93% -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4869 - 5091, n=2)
4980 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (21 - 7500, n=635)
1530 Points ∼29% -70%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
9294 Points ∼66%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
8344 Points ∼59% -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
9143 Points ∼64% -2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
7423 Points ∼52% -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
14189 Points ∼100% +53%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
8988 Points ∼63% -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (8988 - 9294, n=2)
9141 Points ∼64% -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (369 - 14189, n=635)
2994 Points ∼21% -68%
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
4992 Points ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192
4520 Points ∼81% -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288
4982 Points ∼89% 0%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192
4045 Points ∼72% -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096
5607 Points ∼100% +12%
OnePlus 7T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
5124 Points ∼91% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
  (4992 - 5124, n=2)
5058 Points ∼90% +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 6097, n=635)
1501 Points ∼27% -70%
AnTuTu v8
UX (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
78191 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
78191 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15332 - 78191, n=5)
39821 Points ∼51% -49%
MEM (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
64026 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
64026 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (24176 - 64026, n=5)
42308 Points ∼66% -34%
GPU (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
199051 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
199051 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15036 - 199051, n=5)
88329 Points ∼44% -56%
CPU (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
145386 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
145386 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (40810 - 145386, n=5)
86703 Points ∼60% -40%
Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192
486654 Points ∼100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
486654 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (95354 - 486654, n=5)
257161 Points ∼53% -47%

The OnePlus 7T Pro has similar results as its predecessor while surfing the web, although the OnePlus 7T is a little faster thanks to the lower resolution. In practice, the 7T Pro is very fast at browsing the web and pages load quickly with the images appearing very quickly if not immediately. The 90-Hz panel makes scrolling down websites very pleasant.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
129.096 Points ∼100% +107%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
65.295 Points ∼51% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 65.3, n=2)
63.9 Points ∼49% +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
62.5 Points ∼48% 0%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
62.417 Points ∼48%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
58.746 Points ∼46% -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)
44.128 Points ∼34% -29%
Average of class Smartphone (9.13 - 133, n=106)
35.7 Points ∼28% -43%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
301.91 Points ∼100% +162%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
120.83 Points ∼40% +5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (115 - 121, n=2)
118 Points ∼39% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
115.44 Points ∼38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
96.094 Points ∼32% -17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
91.774 Points ∼30% -21%
Average of class Smartphone (10 - 302, n=530)
41.7 Points ∼14% -64%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
153 runs/min ∼100% +130%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)
69.1 runs/min ∼45% +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (66.4 - 69.1, n=2)
67.8 runs/min ∼44% +2%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chome 78)
66.4 runs/min ∼43%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)
61.5 runs/min ∼40% -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
56 runs/min ∼37% -16%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
42.5 runs/min ∼28% -36%
Average of class Smartphone (6.42 - 157, n=94)
40 runs/min ∼26% -40%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
181 Points ∼100% +95%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
115 Points ∼64% +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
111 Points ∼61% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
107 Points ∼59% +15%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
100 Points ∼55% +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (93 - 100, n=2)
96.5 Points ∼53% +4%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
93 Points ∼51%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 184, n=163)
66.7 Points ∼37% -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
49388 Points ∼100% +106%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
25353 Points ∼51% +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
24730 Points ∼50% +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23999 - 25353, n=2)
24676 Points ∼50% +3%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
23999 Points ∼49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
20849 Points ∼42% -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
20598 Points ∼42% -14%
Average of class Smartphone (894 - 49388, n=691)
6771 Points ∼14% -72%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (571 - 59466, n=716)
10543 ms * ∼100% -394%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)
2333.5 ms * ∼22% -9%
OnePlus 7T Pro (Chrome 78)
2133.5 ms * ∼20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2021 - 2134, n=2)
2077 ms * ∼20% +3%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)
2021.4 ms * ∼19% +5%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)
1965 ms * ∼19% +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)
1856.6 ms * ∼18% +13%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1)
570.9 ms * ∼5% +73%

* ... smaller is better

The fast UFS 3.0 storage in the OnePlus smartphone easily overtakes Samsung's Galaxy S10 Plus with a UFS 2.1 storage in terms of speed. It accesses data very quickly, which makes the system feel extremely smooth. Apps start quickly and you don't have to wait long when copying files. 

OnePlus 7T ProSamsung Galaxy S10 PlusOnePlus 7 ProXiaomi Mi 9T ProOnePlus 7TAverage 256 GB UFS 3.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
-2%
90%
-9%
57%
-61%
Random Write 4KB
26
22.7
-13%
24.8
-5%
148.51
471%
29.9
15%
80.1 (24.8 - 192, n=6)
208%
22.3 (0.14 - 250, n=751)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
169
135.16
-20%
174.1
3%
142.5
-16%
170.1
1%
180 (169 - 196, n=6)
7%
47.6 (1.59 - 196, n=751)
-72%
Sequential Write 256KB
405
249.06
-39%
387
-4%
196.87
-51%
218.4
-46%
461 (387 - 590, n=6)
14%
97.4 (2.99 - 590, n=751)
-76%
Sequential Read 256KB
1489
811.17
-46%
1468
-1%
808.76
-46%
1406
-6%
1482 (1463 - 1504, n=6)
0%
275 (12.1 - 1504, n=751)
-82%

Games – a trick for 90-Hz gaming

The OnePlus 7T Pro is very promising in terms of gaming: The fast processor and graphics unit enable users to play most current mobile games smoothly. If you are looking for 90-Hz gaming or even smoother refresh rates similar to those of the Razer Phone 2, you might be disappointed at first: OnePlus automatically limits the refresh rates for gaming, presumably to preserve the battery. If you wish to play at 90 Hz, you will have to use a trick that our colleagues over at XDA Developers published on their page. The OnePlus 7T Pro manages 60 Hz in apps that support this refresh rate and can keep it up without any noticeable drops.

The touchscreen and position sensor both work very nicely as controls.

Shadow Fight 3
Shadow Fight 3
Arena of Valor
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
0102030405060Tooltip
; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (58-60)
; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.9 (50-60)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.8.1a: Ø29.4 (25-31)
; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.8.1a: Ø29.9 (27-31)
; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.19.2: Ø59.6 (52-60)
; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.19.2: Ø59.9 (59-60)

Emissions – it's getting hot

Temperature

GFXBench battery test T-Rex
GFXBench battery test T-Rex

Like the OnePlus 7T, the OnePlus 7T Pro has an issue with heat development: Its maximum surface temperature of 46.9 °C (116.4 °F) is getting close to critical. In summer, putting the smartphone into your pocket after intensive use could become uncomfortable. But even just holding it in your hand you will notice the significant heat development. These issues do not occur under low loads.  

There is another similarity to the smaller sibling: The SoC becomes so hot under load during our test with the GFXBench battery test Manhattan 3.1 that it overheats and aborts the test. The simpler T-Rex test can be completed and does not show any throttling. While this is an extreme load scenario, users might still have issues with the temperature development of the OnePlus 7T in hot surroundings or when using demanding apps.

Max. Load
 46.9 °C
116 F
45.3 °C
114 F
40.4 °C
105 F
 
 46.1 °C
115 F
44.9 °C
113 F
40.5 °C
105 F
 
 44.9 °C
113 F
43.7 °C
111 F
40.5 °C
105 F
 
Maximum: 46.9 °C = 116 F
Average: 43.7 °C = 111 F
37.8 °C
100 F
41 °C
106 F
43.8 °C
111 F
38.2 °C
101 F
40.1 °C
104 F
42.6 °C
109 F
38 °C
100 F
41 °C
106 F
41.5 °C
107 F
Maximum: 43.8 °C = 111 F
Average: 40.4 °C = 105 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.1 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 21.9 °C = 71 F | Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.5 °C / 96 F, ranging from 22.4 to 51.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.1 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.1 °C / 92 F.
Heat map back
Heat map back
Heat map front
Heat map front

Speakers

Speaker test Pink Noise
Speaker test Pink Noise

The stereo speakers in our test are loud but not quite as loud as they were on the predecessor. The audio quality is still very good. Music sounds warm and balanced, perhaps there is too much focus on voices. There is no humming or other noise even at maximum volume. Classical music sounds nuanced and the individual instruments are easily recognizable. Again, voices are the main focus when playing films, but the audio is very weighty and clear in general.

Headphones or speakers can be connected via the USB port or via Bluetooth. Both work perfectly and transmit a clear sound.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.231.22537.534.13130.529.3403329.65037.635.86328.625.88023.922.210022.824.712521.929.216020.338.82002045.825019.153.53151756.640016.556.150016.86063016.260.580015.564.6100014.869.1125014.171.4160015.573.9200015.572.5250014.571.2315013.869.7400013.767500013.866.863001465.580001466.91000014.165.71250014.263.41600014.353SPL65.168.168.164.360.964.462.127.181.4N18.721.921.916.313.816.914.70.948median 15.5median 64.6Delta1.97.947.650.144.645.140.239.737.739.938.440.831.933.828.73029.137.42839.626.349.925.858.624.463.72465.823.864.422.568.922.569.421.773.521.881.821.179.822.381.322.180.221.181.420.980.720.680.620.878.920.770.620.967.72168.120.969.72163.875.633.790.934.92.183.1median 21.8median 69.429.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseOnePlus 7T ProOnePlus 7 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
OnePlus 7T Pro audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

OnePlus 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 24%, worst was 44%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%

Battery Life – high consumption while idling but good stamina

Power Consumption

The big, bright display with 90-Hz technology seems to take a toll on the power consumption - particularly while idling. The consumption under load is average.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.1 / 3 / 3.5 Watt
Load midlight 5.3 / 8.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
26%
22%
36%
26%
28%
9%
39%
Idle Minimum *
2.1
0.73
65%
0.9
57%
0.7
67%
0.92
56%
0.9
57%
1.7 (0.9 - 2.1, n=3)
19%
0.882 (0.2 - 3.4, n=780)
58%
Idle Average *
3
1.53
49%
1.8
40%
1
67%
2.9
3%
1.4
53%
2.47 (1.4 - 3, n=3)
18%
1.74 (0.6 - 6.2, n=779)
42%
Idle Maximum *
3.5
2.07
41%
2.9
17%
1.3
63%
2.94
16%
2.9
17%
3.3 (2.9 - 3.5, n=3)
6%
2.03 (0.74 - 6.6, n=780)
42%
Load Average *
5.3
6.03
-14%
5.5
-4%
5.2
2%
3.65
31%
4.7
11%
5.1 (4.7 - 5.3, n=3)
4%
4.07 (0.8 - 10.8, n=774)
23%
Load Maximum *
8.3
9.18
-11%
8.2
1%
10
-20%
6.18
26%
8.3
-0%
8.3 (8.3 - 8.3, n=3)
-0%
5.91 (1.2 - 14.2, n=774)
29%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Despite the high consumption while idling, the OnePlus 7T Pro does a great job in our battery test: It manages 15 hours of browsing the web non-stop, which should easily suffice for two working days of heavy use. The battery life has increased slightly compared to the OnePlus 7 Pro: The battery has a little more capacity and the new software and SoC also have had a positive impact. The difference is marginal compared to the OnePlus 7T, however, which might be due to the display offering significantly lower pixels.   

Thanks to WarpCharge 30T, the smartphone recharges fully in a little over an hour. Even if the smartphone is only connected to mains for a few minutes, it gets enough power to last half a day with moderate use.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 35min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
15h 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 43min
OnePlus 7T Pro
4085 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus
4100 mAh
OnePlus 7 Pro
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro
4000 mAh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max
3969 mAh
OnePlus 7T
3800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-27%
-16%
-9%
29%
-1%
Reader / Idle
2015
1560
-23%
1745
-13%
1768
-12%
2618
30%
2003
-1%
H.264
957
921
-4%
802
-16%
987
3%
1346
41%
967
1%
WiFi v1.3
912
483
-47%
768
-16%
762
-16%
909
0%
896
-2%
Load
283
187
-34%
236
-17%
249
-12%
408
44%
283
0%

Pros

+ good speakers
+ great cameras
+ notch-free design
+ good-looking matte back cover
+ high performance
+ fairly precise GPS
+ a lot of LTE frequencies
+ very fast recharging
+ high-resolution HDR display with good color accuracy
+ 90-Hz technology ensures smooth handling
+ clear, comprehensive software

Cons

- strong heat development and overheating under extreme load
- no wireless recharging
- no warranty for dust and water damage
- no 90 Hz for games ex-works

Verdict – OnePlus has a great offer

Review: OnePlus 7T Pro. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
Review: OnePlus 7T Pro. Test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

OnePlus still has it: The OnePlus 7T Pro is another high-quality smartphone that offers several highlights including a 90-Hz display, a camera with 3x zoom, a matte case and great stereo speakers. This all comes at a price that is still somewhat below that of other high-end smartphones. Still, the days in which OnePlus flagship phones were a bargain available for under $400 are over. Xiaomi is the go-to company for that price range at the moment with its Mi 9T Pro.

Users will still have to make do without some of the usual flagship features: For example, there is no warranty for the impermeability of the phone, no wireless charging and no microSD slot. Long-standing fans of OnePlus might also miss the 3.5-mm audio jack, although this has been gone for a few generations. The smartphone also throttles its performance under extreme load and its Wi-Fi is slower than that of the ultimate top-of-the-range devices.

The OnePlus 7T Pro is a real high-end smartphone and a great offer, albeit no longer a bargain.

If you can accept some missing connectivity features, you will get a great deal of additional features that the usual high-end smartphones don't offer: While the quick-charge technology from OnePlus is no longer uncontested like it was a few years ago, it still is one of the fastest around. The clear, simple and broad range of software with regular updates and a notch-free display are an additional plus.

In short, the OnePlus 7T Pro is worth the money. If you are looking for a good quality high-end smartphone you should definitely take this device into consideration.  

OnePlus 7T Pro - 11/03/2019 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
98%
Connectivity
46 / 70 → 66%
Weight
88%
Battery
90%
Display
88%
Games Performance
59 / 64 → 92%
Application Performance
78 / 86 → 90%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
76%
Average
80%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > OnePlus 7T Pro Smartphone Review – the fastest charger
Florian Schmitt, 2019-11- 4 (Update: 2019-11- 7)