Vivo X60 Pro
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.5, 26mm, 1/2.8", 0.8µm)
Price comparison
Average of 54 scores (from 97 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo X60 Pro
The X60 Pro starts with Zeiss lenses and a new gimbal camera system. Whether the collaboration with the traditional German manufacturer makes the classic OIS stabilization forgettable or serves more for marketing purposes, you can find out in our review of the Vivo phone.
Source: DxOMark

The Vivo X60 Pro (Snapdragon) smoothly adapts to changing light conditions and has accurate color rendering. However, it lacks brightness in most tested conditions, and this has an impact on the user experience, especially when watching HDR10 videos, which lack contrast and appear somewhat flat. Dark tones are missing and a green cast is noticeable. The device has a smooth feel when browsing the web and when gaming. Although the screen reacts accurately when gaming, touch reactivity in the corners is poor, and aliasing is visible.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/24/2022
Source: DxOMark

The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) arrived on the market in March 2021. Belonging to our Premium ($600-799) segment, it has a display with a 120 Hz refresh rate and a 240 Hz touch sampling rate, among other nice features. Let’s see how it did in our Battery protocol tests. The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) put in an above-average performance in our Battery protocol tests. Showing no weaknesses, it takes over the top spot in the Premium segment.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/21/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is the EU version of the mobile phone, which differs from the China-exclusive Exynos version in terms of chipset among other characteristics. The EU model features the Snapdragon 870 chipset with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage, runs Android 11, and boasts a 4200 mAh battery with 33W flash charging. The display is a large 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED with a 120 Hz refresh rate. For selfies, both the EU and China models use the same front camera module. There’s a 32 MP sensor coupled with an f/2.45 aperture lens. Video is also captured at full HD 1080p at 30 fps resolution.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/18/2021
Source: Know Your Mobile

The VIVO X60 Pro costs £748, so it is not what you’d call a cheap phone. It’s not even a mid-range phone. It is a flagship phone that costs about as much as the Galaxy S21, the iPhone 12, and the Xiaomi Mi 11. For this amount of money, you expect a few things to be in place, things like an IP rating, solid battery life, and a high-resolution display. You’d also expect to have the best CPU money can buy. But on the VIVO X60 Pro, all of these things are missing. I do like the VIVO X60 Pro and I had a great time testing it but for the asking price, it does fall short in my eyes. If it cost £499, I’d be recommending this phone to everyone. But it doesn’t. And at this price point, the VIVO X60 Pro, with all of its foibles, just isn’t as competitive as the competition.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/31/2021
Rating: Total score: 72%
Source: GSM Choice

Vivo X60 Pro entered European markets just over half a year after the brand's debut on the Old Continent and the launch of quite successful Vivo X51. Is the successor better than the predecessor? You will find out from the following review! At the outset, let me explain that in this review we are talking about the European variant of Vivo X60 Pro, labeled V2046. You must know that there is also a "Chinese" version of this phone, with the same name, but different interface and - more importantly - processor. We got the Snapdragon 870 instead of the Exynos 1080. Unfortunately, along the way, the European variant lost its telephoto camera - making it a bit weaker than its predecessor . But maybe something has also changed for the better...?
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2021
Source: DxOMark

In 2020, Vivo released the X60 Pro, driven by an Exynos chip, in China. In April of this year, the X60 Pro went global, but this time, it was equipped with the Snapdragon 870 5G chipset. The X60 Pro is one of the brand’s flagships, just downstream from the X60 Pro Plus, with features like a 6.56 inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, a four-camera array, and a fast-charging 4200 mAh (TYP) battery. Vivo’s website does not mention the X60 Pro’s audio specifications, but it has one speaker that is bottom right-side firing.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/25/2021
Source: Talk Android

On sale in Europe, UK, India, and a few other Asian countries, the Vivo X60 Pro is being sold at £749/€799 which is pretty much the same price as the X51 5G from 2020. This time around, though, there’s a flagship (ish) processor in the form of the Snapdragon 870 which brings a nice performance boost to a svelte-looking handset. The Vivo X60 has its strengths such as the very capable 48MP main camera with Gimbal Stabilization 2.0, a very good AMOLED display, and a stunning design, but there are glaring omissions such as wireless charging, the limited 33W fast-charging speed, an IP rating, and the expensive price tag. Much like the X51 5G, the X60 Pro is a very good phone that is weighed down by its RRP when compared to competitors such as the Galaxy S21 and Mi 11i.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/16/2021
Source: DxOMark

The Vivo X60 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) is the global release of this device and differs from the China-only Exynos version not only in the chipset but also in the photography specifications, with only a single tele-lens included on the Snapdragon model versus two teles on the model for the Chinese market. The handset features the Snapdragon 870 chipset with 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage, runs Android 11, and boasts a 4200 mAh battery with 33W flash charging. The display is a large 6.56-inch FHD+ AMOLED with a 120 Hz refresh rate. Aside from dropping the second tele-lens, the camera is the same as in the Exynos version. Co-engineered with Zeiss, the primary camera is built around a 48 MP Quad Bayer sensor (12 MP output) with a f/1.48-aperture lens. Both zoom cameras utilize 13 MP sensors, with a f/2.56-aperture lens on the tele and a f/2.2-aperture lens on the ultra-wide.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/11/2021
Source: Hardware Zone

The vibrant competition Vivo faces give us pause before recommending it as a top-of-mind purchase. Unfortunately, this choice dilemma results in the X60 Pro losing a little of its lustre, despite the phone being relatively well put together. Really, if you’re able to fork out close to S$1,200, there are so many other true flagships with other perks to consider, even before you look at this pretty phone. Even the S$999 non-Pro based Vivo X60 that loses the gimbal stabilisation feature is still a hard choice against the ASUS and Xiaomi options. So let's take a look at the Vivo X60 series' strong suit. At the $1,000 price point, Vivo's options excel in its attention to design, handling and extreme battery life. Also, if you're a Vivo fan and this is a logical upgrade for you, hop over to their official Shopee e-store to get one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/18/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Gadgetguy

The Vivo X60 Pro has upped the cameraphone game with the addition of ZEISS Vario-Tessar lenses, Gimbal stabilisation 2.0 and a cute rotating Biotar bokeh effect. It is also one of the best-looking smartphones we have seen. To give you an idea of how good its camera is, DXOMark gives the X60 Pro+ (has a periscope zoom in addition to the X60 Pro lenses) 128 – a score reserved for Apple iPhone 12 Pro/Max and just three points off the incredible OPPO Find X3 Pro camera. Yet this costs a mere $1099 against the best at >$1500. We will come to the camera later, but you need to know that there are no obvious or hidden downsides to saving $500 by purchasing this impressive device. The highlights are Qualcomm SD870, Gimbal camera and a 120Hz, HDR10+, Gorilla Glass 6, AMOLED screen that is a sheer delight in its almost 19.8:9 tall and thin format.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 94% price: 90% performance: 90% workmanship: 100%
Source: Hardware Zone

The audio quality also did no favours to the Vivo phone. If anything, medium-to-heavy users of music and videos would likely consider another device based on this alone. That leaves us with its excellent form factor and amazing battery life. Its longevity may satisfy some folks, but buyers would also need to consider if they can say no to the ASUS ZenFone 8’s imaging quality, or the 1440p display on Xiaomi Mi 11, or perhaps the Samsung Galaxy S21’s robust ecosystem and UI polish. So let's take a look at the Vivo X60 series' strong suit. At the $1,000 price point, Vivo's options excel in its attention to design, handling and extreme battery life. Also, if you're a Vivo fan and this is a logical upgrade for you, hop over to their official Shopee e-store to get one.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor

The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar

With a good-looking design, well-rounded camera array and slick user interface, the Vivo X60 Pro is a solid jack-of-all-trades Android phone. However, it launched at the same price as some higher-spec contemporaries, making it harder to recommend.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint

The Vivo X60 Pro is no game of two halves, it's an outright winner. The design is largely on point, in particular that soft-touch rear finish, and while its cameras aren't as all-singing, all-dancing as the Zeiss badge on the camera unit might suggest, the main snapper is certainly capable enough. Even the software is largely like stock Google Android, with only minor bouts of foul play - like rare blank notification hiccups - showing its typically inconsistent competition, such as Xiaomi, how things can be done. What's particularly standout about the X60 Pro, however, is the gimbal camera system - delivering stabilisation for video capture that's unlike what any other phone company can muster. The smoothness is mightly impressive, making for a striking feature. Sure, the X60 Pro is a timely launch for Vivo, given Euro 2020, but this isn't a device that only sells itself through the company name being splashed around stadium ad boards, its one that sells itself on sheer ability. Back of the net!
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/02/2021
Source: DxOMark

Basic specs include a 6.56-inch 120 Hz AMOLED display, a 4200 mAh battery with fast 33W charging, and 256 GB storage with 12 GB RAM. Like the X60 Pro+ variant, the X60 Pro 5G (Exynos) is quad-camera device, with dual tele-lenses and an ultra-wide complementing the main camera. Sensor and lens specs differ between the two models, however. That, combined with the change in chipset and image processing pipeline, should make for an interesting comparison between the two devices.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Good Gear Guide

Extremely stylish, and with an excellent 48-megapixel rear camera, the Vivo X60 Pro is the kind of smartphone that you would want to accompany you on trips to scenic places to snap beautiful pictures. Its unique photography modes provide endless possibilities to snap new and interesting photos for your albums.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Stuff TV

Instead of going after the current crop of megabucks flagships, the X60 Pro is well-placed to shake things up in the mid-tier. It's a great-looking handset with a gimbal-stabilised camera that really helps it stand out from similarly-priced rivals. Prospective buyers should ask themselves how much video they actually shoot on their smartphone, though. It's not so competitive in other areas, and offers little else that you won't find in alternatives like OnePlus, Xiaomi or even Samsung. Given those brands will all be more familiar to UK customers, it makes the X60 Pro that bit harder to recommend, despite being so well-rounded.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor

The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor

The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging, an IP rating, or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Business Standard

Priced at Rs 49,990 (12+256GB), the Vivo X60 Pro is a surprise package, at least for those who did not experience the X50 Pro. It has set the new benchmark for premium-midrange smartphones, considering the number of photography features and updates it offers. The X60 Pro is more than just a camera phone. It is an all-round smartphone with strengths across.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/07/2021
Source: Tech2.in.com

The Vivo X60 Pro is a phone that I think will find a lot of takers, simply because it is priced right. Despite not being the flagship of the series, it manages to sacrifice precious little in the end. I think a value-conscious market like India will appreciate the balance this phone has managed to achieve. Vivo does, however, need to rethink FunTouch OS, starting with the name but more deeply with the inclusion of unescapable paid content and app pushes. Vivo: please start sparing the Pro and Pro+ versions of your phones from this. People have paid extra for a better device, charge them a little more so you don’t have to push this content onto them.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/30/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 100% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: NDTV Gadgets

The Vivo X60 Pro is a good successor to the Vivo X50 Pro, and improves in areas that the latter lacked in. Performance has gotten a good bump thanks to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SoC. Photo and video quality are also better than with the predecessor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews

There are lingering question marks over its price and availability so I won't be scoring the Vivo X60 Pro yet, but as it stands this is a unique upper-mid-range/entry-flagship phone with a remarkably stable camera, a highly desirable design and solid performance. It isn't the best-specced phone in its class, however, and for all its camera charms it doesn’t take the best photos. As a value proposition, we suspect it’s going to struggle against the altogether more capable OnePlus 9. But for those looking for something a little different in a rather samey field, it’s a sleek and stylish alternative.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/14/2021
Source: GSM Arena

It's among the finest-built handsets that you can get, and the color version we reviewed has an understated beauty that we find very stylish. The AMOLED display is simply gorgeous, the chipset is predictably potent, and the cameras are excellent for most anything.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Manila Shaker

And finally – the price. At RM3,299 – the Vivo X60 Pro does seem to be pricy at the time being. As it stands now, the Vivo X60 Pro doesn’t seem like a worthy upgrade over the X50 Pro from last year as I think that there is still a lot of room for improvement on the X60 Pro.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/07/2021
Source: The Indian Express

The Vivo X60 Pro is priced at Rs 49,990 making this a flagship level offering for 12GB RAM and 256GB storage space. The obvious competitor is the OnePlus 9, which now starts at Rs 49,999 for the 8GB/128GB variant and Rs 54,999 for the 12GB/256GB variant, but it runs the Snapdragon 888, which is the latest and more powerful processor. If you are looking to spend Rs 50,000 on a smartphone, the vivo X60 Pro is a worthy contender. The camera, performance and battery life are all excellent, and you are getting 256GB storage, which is an added advantage.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Business Standard

The Vivo X60 Pro is a flagship smartphone and it feels just that in every respect. A major downside is that it lacks assured protection from water and dust, so users will have to be extra careful with the phone. While there is no lag in performance, the camera is one area where we would like to dig deeper. We will reserve for now our verdict on the Vivo X60 Pro, as we explore this device further and write about it in our in-depth review.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Tech Advisor

The X60 Pro is a confident flagship from Vivo that plays to its strengths: a beautiful, lightweight design and strong main camera. You won't get wireless charging or the absolute top-tier chipset, but for many those will be smart sacrifices to make.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Source: Think Digit

The Vivo X60 Pro is the coming of age for Vivo. This smartphone establishes that Vivo can make a smartphone with an incredible camera stack, as the Zeiss partnership has yielded very impressive results. The new Gimbal 20 stabilisation also works ridiculously well and the overall camera experience is so good that you'd want to take more photos and shoot more videos. Vivo hasn't skimped out on the hardware either, giving you a flagship Snapdragon 870 SoC, 12GB LPDDR4x memory and even 256GB of UFS3.1 storage.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 85% performance: 82% workmanship: 75%
Source: India Today

The Vivo X60 Pro is the dark horse of 2021. Almost no one expected Vivo to come with such a powerful smartphone in India and the smartphone has surprised. OnePlus has made few sacrifices on the OnePlus 9 this year which may force few potential buyers to at least consider alternatives and the Vivo X60 Pro could just be that smartphone. Also, Vivo now has a chance to feed into some of OnePlus’ market share in the mid-premium category with the latter deciding to move towards the premium category.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Slashgear

2021 started with a bit of uncertainty, especially for the smartphone market. Has the economy recovered enough to take big risks in new products? Or are consumers still opting to make “safe” purchases of familiar and tested products? The one thing that remains unchanged even with the pandemic is people’s needs for an accessible smartphone with top-notch cameras that can capture their memories in perfect detail and performance that goes beyond its price tag. That’s what Vivo is promising with the Vivo X60 Pro, one of its first to be made in collaboration with famed optics company ZEISS, and we take an intimate look to see if it all checks out.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Mobile Indian

The Vivo X60 Pro comes really close to being a perfect flagship. It has a great display, top-level performance and some great pair of cameras that help in elevating the experience to new heights. But compared to its main competitor - OnePlus 9R, the Vivo X60 Pro despite being a great device falls short on the pricing because of which it might fail to appeal to the audience.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: Gadgets Now

Vivo has launched the X60 Pro at the same price as it had launched the X50 Pro. If you compare it to just that, you find that the company has offered improvements in terms of processor, internal storage, RAM and to some extent in terms of the camera also.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews

I’ll save my full thoughts for the full review, but it is clear gimbal stabilisation makes a huge difference – though I can’t say I completely love it. Yes, the footage is very stable and this is good if you’re moving quickly. There is an almost faux-look to video and it takes a while to adjust. If your stabilisation seems off then there’s a handy tool to calibrate it.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: NDTV Gadgets

When I tested the Vivo X50 Pro, I was impressed with its gimbal camera stabilisation system. Now, I am curious to see what has improved. If you shoot a lot of videos and have the Vivo X60 Pro on your mind, then don't miss my full review, coming up soon.
Hands-On, online available, Short, Date: 03/25/2021
Source: 91mobiles

There is no doubt in my mind that the Vivo X60 Pro has the best design in all the flagship devices I have tested so far this year. It feels extremely premium in the hand and at the same time, it’s been constructed with durability in mind. There is very little to complain about in the performance department apart from the unusual heating of the device during some heavy-ended graphics-based usage. The cameras are also exceptional, especially when you compare the low-light capabilities to some of the competing devices. Apart from that, the X60 Pro’s superlative display matches up to industry standards and packs in all the features that you could possibly want. Could the haptics have been better? Most definitely. The battery life is nothing to write home about and the lack of wireless charging or an official IP rating makes me question the price tag. FunTouch is in a state of improvement and still has some way to go.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 90%
Source: Pokde

All in all, the vivo X60 Pro was pretty fun to use and it feels premium. Despite that, some may argue that vivo is asking a lot for the device considering that it is priced at RM3,299. At that price, you’d definitely find other flagships that offer a higher-end Snapdragon 888 chip more attractive. Don’t get me wrong though as the Snapdragon 870 is still a powerful SoC, but I just feel that they should offer more for the price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/24/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 83% mobility: 85% workmanship: 87%
Source: Engadget

vivo and ZEISS believe they are ideal partners that go beyond simple unilateral pursuits; in fact, the brands reached a consensus through fruitful communications, series of virtual meetings and mutual site visits, hoping to achieve greatness in this new era. With that being said, vivo and ZEISS will collaborate on an ongoing basis and have established the “vivo ZEISS Imaging Lab” as a joint R&D team and facility. We’re expecting more exciting new developments and mobile photography breakthroughs to come!
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/11/2021
Source: Igeekphone

From the results, as the first finished product of Vivo and Zeiss, the performance of Vivo X60 Pro is also remarkable. In particular, the “Vivo Zeiss Joint Imaging System” is equipped to bring a rich and transparent imaging effect. Of course, this is just the beginning. With the continuous development of cooperation between the two parties, I believe that Vivo Zeiss will continue to promote mobile imaging technology to go further.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/31/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: Tech Stage

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/17/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Go2 Mobile

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2021
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 62% performance: 79% mobility: 84% workmanship: 87%
Source: Allround-PC.com

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/14/2021
Source: Stadt-bremerhaven

Comparison, online available, Medium, Date: 07/11/2021
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 94% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 88% workmanship: 100%
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2021
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90%
Source: WinFuture

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2021
Source: Computerbild

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 91%
Source: Nextpit Germany

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2021
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/12/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MobiFlip

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Xataka

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/20/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 95% display: 88% mobility: 78% workmanship: 90%
Source: Hipertextual

Positive: Support 5G; elegant design; nice cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Nice cameras; decent processor; beautiful design; great built quality; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2021
Source: Smartphone Italia

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Geek 4 You

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Chimera Revo

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Chimera Revo

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2021
Rating: Total score: 79%
Source: Notebook Italia

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/22/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% features: 80% display: 85% mobility: 75% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 53% features: 81%
Source: DDay IT

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/21/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 69% display: 85% mobility: 73% workmanship: 89%
Source: Tutto Android

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/08/2021
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 90% mobility: 78% workmanship: 88%
Source: Batista70Phone

Positive: Excellent cameras; high performance; beautiful display; long battery life. Negative: Mono speakers.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2021
Source: Quotidiano Hardware Upgrade

Positive: High performance; slim size; light weight; nice display; great cameras. Negative: No wireless charging; unsupported waterproof; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2021
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/03/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Meilleurmobile

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Journal du Geek

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/15/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 07/02/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/26/2021
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Nextpit France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/16/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Fredzone

Positive: Decent processor; nice performance; attractive price; support 5G. Negative: Mono speakers; slow charging.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/18/2021
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: Premium design; excellent display; high performance; support 5G. Negative: No wireless charging; mediocre speakers; short battery life; no mini jack; no microSD card slot; no LED notification.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/04/2021
Source: Frandroid

Positive: Attractive price; nice design; decent hardware; good performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/22/2021
Source: Galaktyczny

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Galaktyczny

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/28/2021
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android.com.pl

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/09/2021
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Komputerswiat

Positive: Stylish design; nice display; big screen; high performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/08/2021
Source: Product Test

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/07/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 94% mobility: 80%
Source: Zoom

Positive: Attractive price; great cameras; powerful hardware; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/01/2021
Source: Hitech Vesti

Positive: Slim size; light weight; nice design; metal case; great built quality; powerful hardware; beautiful display; excellent cameras; fast charging. Negative: No headphone jack; no stereo speakers; no microSD card slot.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/03/2021
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Low price; nice cameras; excellent display; long battery life; quick charging; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/12/2021
Source: Smartmania.cz

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 91% features: 86% mobility: 75% workmanship: 92%
Source: Svet Androida

Positive: Elegant design; great built quality; powerful hardware; nice cameras; decent display. Negative: Short battery life; no wireless charging; mono speakers; unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/09/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Powerful processor; excellent cameras; beautiful display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/15/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Simple design; solid workmanship; nice cameras; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Excellent cameras; nice display; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Genk

Positive: Excellent cameras; powerful processor; good price; support 5G.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/02/2021
Source: Zing

Positive: Impressive cameras; premium design; great built quality; attractive price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/24/2021
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Simple design; impressive cameras; decent hardware; nice gaming performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Powerful processor; 12GB RAM; nice cameras; support 5G.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/23/2021
Source: FPT shop

Positive: Excellent cameras; powerful hardware; support 5G; premium design.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 03/22/2021
Source: Nghenhin Vietnam

Positive: Powerful processor; excellent cameras; quick charging; premium design; solid workmanship; big screen.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/13/2021
Source: Arena IT

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2021
Rating: Total score: 92% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 90%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 650: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm claims that it is 25% faster than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855 SoC and offers 50% more compute units (ALUs). For Android it should be one of the fastest graphics cards in 2020.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 870: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in mid 2020 and manufactured in 7 nm at TSMC (improved N7P). Integrates one Prime Core based on a ARM Cortex-A77 architecture clocked at up to 3.2 GHz. Three more performance cores are also based on the A77 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.56":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.81.64%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.