Realme X50 Pro
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (FOV 80.4°, f/2.5, 5P lens Sony IMX 616) + 8 MP (FOV 105°, f/2.2, 5P lens)
Pricecompare
Average of 10 scores (from 23 reviews)
Reviews for the Realme X50 Pro
The X50 Pro shines with a great case design and good specifications. However, the Realme flagship smartphone lacks a few premium features compared to its high-end competition. In this review, we will take a look at the drawbacks that buyers of the X50 Pro will have to contend with.
Source: Unbox Archive.org version
With X50 Pro being the brand’s second official flagship phone in the Philippines (the first one being the X3 SuperZoom), it is the more proper flagship killer with its 5G capabilities and newer internals. While it is not the best when it comes to battery life, its insanely fast 65w charging solution disregards this issue.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/07/2020
Source: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
The realme X50 Pro 5G is the fastest realme smartphone in the Philippines right now and the performance is an excellent deal for the budget. However, there are still downsides to this flagship killer phone. It doesn’t have an IP68 water-resistant, no wireless charging, and no periscope lens that you can see on the latest flagships though this cuts the budget to make one flagship phone. The camera quality feels neutral and the features feel less. We are hoping that it can be improved through software updates. Upside? well, it has reliable hardware for day to day use and it feels premium thanks to the great haptic feedback, vapor cooling system, dual speakers, 90Hz, impressive 65W charging, and a flagship SoC with 5G connectivity. It still gives the flagship level feel while offering a balance and overall performance and quality.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/05/2020
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Source: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
The Realme X50 Pro 5G is truly an amazing smartphone especially the speed of its connection and the processor. However there are some details we want to improve especially in the camera quality. Realme UI 2.0 is a great skin and offers fluidity and personalization that is pretty impressive and hopefully, realme will push an update for optimization in the camera performance. Overall Realme X50 Pro 5G is fast and powerful enough and very affordable flagship phone.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
Just like its standard version, the realme X50 Pro 5G is also a well-rounded device and a solid one, for that matter. We get a 90Hz Super AMOLED display, a flagship processor, a large 12GB RAM, and a great set of cameras, which, we must say, a lot of people would appreciate. And it’s also 5G-ready!
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/03/2020
Source: Tech Nave Archive.org version
And that's it for our review of the realme X50 Pro 5G. For 12GB RAM and 256GB at RM2999, this is a phone that's more suitable for those who want a high-end flagship like gamers. After all, what other use is a flagship chipset if not for gaming, right?
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/24/2020
Source: Tech Nave Archive.org version
The realme's first 5G smartphone, realme X50 Pro 5G has arrived in Malaysia. It features a Snapdragon 865 5G chipset coupled up with 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. Besides, it also packs with quite a few flagship tech specs for our Malaysia market including a 65W super fast charge technology for the price of RM2999.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/17/2020
Foreign Reviews
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/20/2020
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/14/2020
Source: Teltarif DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/23/2020
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Game IT ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; excellent cameras; large battery capacity; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/16/2020
Source: Pplware PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/23/2021
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 80% features: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 90%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 07/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 79% features: 79%
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/11/2020
Rating: Total score: 87%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN
Positive: Big screen; nice display; decent hardware; great cameras; premium design; solid workmanship; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/10/2021
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/10/2020
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Journal du Geek FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/19/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 100% price: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: Hitek FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; fast charging; good price; elegant design. Negative: No wireless charging.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/03/2020
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Premium design; high performance; powerful hardware; excellent display; great dual cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/17/2020
Source: Jagat Review ID→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Support 5G; nice performance; excellent display; great cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/25/2020
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/17/2020
Rating: Total score: 78%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 650: Graphics chip for smartphones and tablets that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC. Qualcomm claims that it is 25% faster than the Adreno 640 in the Snapdragon 855 SoC and offers 50% more compute units (ALUs). For Android it should be one of the fastest graphics cards in 2020.
Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 865: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2019 and manufactured in 7 nm at TSMC (improved N7P). Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-A77 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are also based on the A77 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6 modem (including 60 GHz mmWave support), a Hexagon 698 DSP (up to 15 TOPS) and a Spectra 480 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 2,750 MHz. LTE is not included anymore in the SoC, but the external Snapdragon X55 5G modem has to be used.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.44":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.87.01%: This is an above-average rating. Nevertheless, it should not be forgotten that about one fifth of all tested models receive a better rating.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.