, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Mali-G76 MP12 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP20

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G76 MP12

The ARM Mali-G76 MP12 is an integrated high-end graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based). It was introduced early 2019 in the Samsung Exynos 9820 (e.g. Galaxy S10 Plus). It integrates 12 of the 20 possible cores and is based on the second generation of the Bifrost architecture. According to ARM it offers improvements in the machine learning efficiency and a bigger tile buffer for 16x anti-aliasing. Compared to the old Mali-G72, the G76 should offer twice the performance per cluster.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12 FL11_1 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP20

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP20

The ARM Mali-G71 MP20 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was e.g. used in smartphone chip Samsung Exynos 9 8895. It features 20 clusters and is manufactured in 10nm FinFET (in the Exynos 8895). The performance is in the high-end class and therefore all current Android games should run fluently on the chip.

ARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G71 MP20
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines10 - unified8 - unified
Shared Memorynono
technology7 nm16 nm
Date of Announcement31.08.2018 29.03.2017
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://developer.arm.com/products/graph...https://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...
CodenameMimir
Core Speed900 (Boost) MHz
CPU in Mali-G76 MP12GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 98258 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 98208 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP20GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa8 x 2300 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 65614     avg: 68730     median: 68654 (11%)     max: 72022 Points
min: 33077     avg: 35410     median: 36347 (6%)     max: 36807 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 4052     avg: 4561     median: 4618 (28%)     max: 5048 Points
min: 3222     avg: 3555     median: 3426 (20%)     max: 4016 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 4449     avg: 5066     median: 5083 (12%)     max: 5605 Points
min: 3896     avg: 4314     median: 4137 (10%)     max: 4908 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 4529     avg: 4827     median: 4720.5 (48%)     max: 5300 Points
min: 2648     avg: 3058     median: 3261 (33%)     max: 3265 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 5358     avg: 5606     median: 5394.5 (21%)     max: 6087 Points
min: 2723     avg: 3293     median: 3571 (14%)     max: 3584 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 50     avg: 104     median: 96.5 (1%)     max: 143 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP20
min: 104     avg: 110     median: 105 (1%)     max: 121 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G76 MP12
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 55     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (2%)     max: 60 fps
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP20
min: 58     avg: 59     median: 59 (2%)     max: 60 fps
min: 50     avg: 54.3     median: 51 (6%)     max: 62 fps
min: 38     avg: 39     median: 38 (10%)     max: 41 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 16     avg: 20.3     median: 16.5 (11%)     max: 29 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 16     avg: 17.2     median: 17 (7%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 16     avg: 25.8     median: 26 (13%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 38     avg: 43.8     median: 45 (8%)     max: 48 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 41022     avg: 41847     median: 42183 (96%)     max: 42335 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 41901     avg: 43072     median: 43464 (97%)     max: 43852 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
7354 Points (7%)
7552 Points (8%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
6315 Points (14%)
2573 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 73% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 fps  fps
med.
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
39 fps  fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
38 fps 39 fps 40 fps 40 fps ~ 39 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps
ultra
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
58 fps 60 fps 60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 fps 60 fps ~ 60 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
60 fps  fps
50%
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Mali-G71 MP20:
30 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps
high
100%
Mali-G76 MP12:
29 fps 29 fps 30 fps 30 fps ~ 30 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP20:
60  fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G76 MP12 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP20 → 50%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 23. 13:39:09

#0 checking url part for id 9822 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7732 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:22:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.05s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9822 +0.024s ... 0.075s

#8 got single benchmarks 9822 +0.011s ... 0.086s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7732 +0s ... 0.086s

#10 got single benchmarks 7732 +0.006s ... 0.093s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.093s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.102s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.102s

#14 Got 35 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.112s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.112s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.113s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.124s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.124s

#19 return log +0.003s ... 0.128s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)