Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi 14T

Xiaomi 14T smartphone review - Flagship tech at a low price, but with a few small flaws

Value for money.

If the Xiaomi 14 is too expensive, then how about the Xiaomi 14T? It is a lot more affordable, while still mastering an extensive range of features—plus, it runs almost as fast as a flagship smartphone. Further things that speak in favor of the 6.67-inch Xiaomi 14T are its 4,000-nit AMOLED panel with a 144 Hz refresh rate, its Leica-optimized triple-camera as well as an update guarantee until Android 18.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict on the Xiaomi 14T - An attractive price-to-performance ratio

With the release of the Xiaomi 14T, Xiaomi has put together a good overall smartphone package that is just below the upper-class level in terms of performance. The Xiaomi 14T takes beautiful photos with its Leica-optimized camera, scores points with its sharp and bright AMOLED panel that now features a refresh rate of 144 Hz, and boasts a good battery life. A solid update timeframe also speaks in favor of the Xiaomi 14T—there will be 4 OS upgrades up to Android 18 and 5 years of Android security updates.

All-in-all, there are only a few negative aspects of the Xiaomi 14T. Its USB-C port works at a leisurely USB-2.0 speed, it doesn't support wireless charging and a corresponding 67-watt power supply isn't included in the phone's scope of delivery. Alternatives to the Xiaomi 14T include the Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G. The Samsung phone is slightly faster than our test candidate thanks to its Exynos 2400 SoC and at 6.2 inches, it is a bit more compact. The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro's connectivity and performance are pretty similar, but it is a lot cheaper.

Pros

+ high-quality & waterproof case
+ bright AMOLED display with 144 Hz refresh rate
+ extensive connectivity
+ solid main camera
+ good performance
+ AI functions including Google Circle to Search
+ long update timeframe
+ fast charging at 67 watts

Cons

- only USB-C 2.0
- no wireless charging
- no power supply included

Price and availability

You can purchase the Xiaomi 14T via online retailers such as Amazon, where it currently costs $548. In the United States, the phone isn't available to order directly from the manufacturer's website.

Possible competitors compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
83.4%
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 14T Pro S...
2. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $9.99
for Xiaomi 14T Pro Screen Pr...
195 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
2.
80.5%
Honor 200 Pro
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
2. $13.46
for Honor 200 Pro Screen Pro...
3. $6.99
Aidinar Screen Protector for...
List Price: 800€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2700x1224
437 PPI
OLED
3.
78.3%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $15.99
AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...
2. $14.99
Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec...
3. $12.99
Vaxson 3-Pack Anti Blue Ligh...
184 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1080
394 PPI
AMOLED
4.
82%
Realme GT 6
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.99
CNPUTAO Case for Realme GT 6...
2. $10.99
CNPUTAO Case for Realme GT 6...
3. $6.38
Turbo Charge Cable for Xiaom...
List Price: 800€
199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"
2780x1264
450 PPI
AMOLED
5.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 899€
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
6.
86.1% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $292.00
List Price: 420€
186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Xiaomi's T-series, which is always released just in time for the end of each year, proves to be an interesting offer for potential buyers. The T-series smartphones combine lots of performance and connectivity with comparatively moderate prices. The Xiaomi 14T makes no exception to this. With an official introductory price of just under $700, the 6.67-inch smartphone is by no means a bargain but at the time of writing, you can already find it for less than $600 online.

Buyers get a lot for their money: The phone features 12 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of storage, the speedy eight-core MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC, an AMOLED panel with a 144 Hz refresh rate, fast charging at up to 67 watts, HyperOS based on Android 14 including AI features such as Google Circle to Search, and last but not least, a triple-camera with a 50-MP resolution.

Specifications

Xiaomi 14T (14T Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra 8 x 2.2 - 3.4 GHz, Cortex-A15 / A510
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, HDR (HLG, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR10), brightness up to 4000 nits, up to 480 Hz touch sampling rate, 3840 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, accelerometer, gyroscope, electronic compass, IR blaster, flicker sensor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, WiFi Direct, USB-OTG, MIracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.8 x 160.5 x 75.1 ( = 0.31 x 6.32 x 2.96 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67W max. charging speed
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX906, f/1.7, 23mm, OIS) + 50 MP telephoto camera (f/1.9, 50mm) + 12 MP ultrawide camera (12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120° FOV); videos up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.0, 25mm, FF, 80,8° FOV); videos up to 4K@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, SIM eject tool, protective case, safety information, quick-start guide, warranty card, HyperOS 1.0, 24 Months Warranty, Head SAR 0.983 W/kg, Body SAR 0.994 W/kg; GPS: L1+L5, Galileo: E1+E5a, GLONASS: G1, Beidou, NavIC: L5; BT-Codecs SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V5, fanless, waterproof
Weight
195 g ( = 6.88 oz / 0.43 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - Available with green faux leather

Compared to the Xiaomi 13T, the manufacturer has made quite a few changes to the design language of its budget smartphone. What has remained are narrow bezels, a punch-hole selfie camera and a first-class finish that also ensures a premium feel. However, the rounded corners and edges on the front and back have been removed—the Xiaomi 14T is now completely flat. An IP68 certification makes sure that the smartphone is protected against dust and water.

Xiaomi has equipped the Xiaomi 14T with a matte aluminum frame whose look depends on the selected color variant, and it features Gorilla Glass 5 to protect its 6.67-inch display. A protective film is also applied to the screen straight out of the box. The triple camera has a new design and now consists of four symmetrically arranged rings that frame the three lenses and the LED flash. Like its display, the phone's camera unit is protected by Gorilla Glass 5.

The Xiaomi smartphone comes with two different back covers. In the three titanium colorways Titan BlackTitan Gray and Titan Blue (the latter being our test device's color), it comes with a glass cover that, thanks to its matte surface finish, isn't all too susceptible to collecting fingerprint marks.

If you decide to go for the fourth color variant called Lemon Green, then the back cover is made from faux leather. The choice of back cover only has a small influence on the device's weight. With a matte glass back, the Xiaomi 14T weighs 195 grams and the faux leather variant—which is 0.15 millimeters thicker—weighs 193 grams.

Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T

Size comparison

163.3 mm / 6.43 in 75.2 mm / 2.96 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 199 g0.4387 lbs162 mm / 6.38 in 75.1 mm / 2.96 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 199 g0.4387 lbs161.4 mm / 6.35 in 74.8 mm / 2.94 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 184 g0.4057 lbs160.45 mm / 6.32 in 74.34 mm / 2.93 in 8.25 mm / 0.3248 in 186 g0.4101 lbs160.5 mm / 6.32 in 75.1 mm / 2.96 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 195 g0.4299 lbs147 mm / 5.79 in 70.6 mm / 2.78 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 167 g0.3682 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - The Xiaomi 14T with 12 GB RAM and up to 512 GB storage

The Xiaomi 14T is available in two storage variants, each with 12 GB of LPDDR5x RAM. The small version with 256 GB of UFS 4.0 flash storage has an MRSP of just under $700. The top-of-the-range version with 512 GB storage is available for around $50 more.

In terms of other connectivity options, the Xiaomi 14T is no different from its big brother, the Xiaomi 14T Pro. In addition to NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, USB OTG, Miracast and an always-on display, it has an IR blaster that can be used to remotely control compatible devices such as smart TVs.

Its USB-C port only works at USB 2.0 speed, but it really put in a good performance during the copying test using an external Samsung 980 SSD, as it achieved 48.9 MByte/s, which is very respectable for USB 2.0.

Left: no connections
Left: no connections
Right: power button, volume rocker
Right: power button, volume rocker
Top: microphone, IR blaster
Top: microphone, IR blaster
Bottom: dual-SIM, microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker
Bottom: dual-SIM, microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker

Software - HyperOS based on Android 14

Xiaomi's HyperOS operating system runs on the Xiaomi 14T, and is based on Android 14. It includes lots of AI functions, such as Google's AI assistant Gemini, a selection of image editing tools, a real-time AI translator for translating conversations and calls, as well as Google's Circle to Search function that can be activated by holding down the home button.

The 14T is set to receive four OS upgrades, so it will see Android 18. Android security patches will be delivered for five years—but from the phone's launch date, which was in September 2024. According to the Xiaomi Security Center, new Android security updates will be rolled out every 90 days. At the time of testing at the beginning of November, the latest security updates were from 1 September, so still pretty up-to-date for Xiaomi's standards.

Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T

Sustainability

Xiaomi hasn't released any precise information about the proportion of recycled materials used in its smartphones. However, according to the manufacturer, the amount of recycled aluminum, gold and copper used for smartphone components has been increased. The company also wants to keep its own ecological footprint as small as possible through measures such as producing plastic material from discarded fishing nets and offering trade-in programs.

Xiaomi supposedly aims to recycle a total of 38,000 tons of electronic waste by 2026. So far, 44% of this target has been reached. The company also follows the provisions of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas and the RBA Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), which regulate the procurement of conflict materials such as tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold and cobalt.

Communication and GNSS - The Xiaomi 14T with WiFi 6E and precise GPS

While the Xiaomi 14T Pro relies on WiFi 7, the Xiaomi 14T has to settle for WiFi 6E. What reads like an unequal battle on paper, however, actually turned out to be a duel of equals in practice. The other comparison devices had no say in terms of speed.

In combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, the Xiaomi 14T achieved a data throughput rate of over 1800 MBit/s within the 6 GHz network, while we noted almost 1000 MBit/s using the 5 GHz band. The Xiaomi 14T Pro barely managed any better in these two instances. Its transfer rates were only significantly lower for a short time at the beginning of the data transfer, but this is due to the router "waking up". Apart from that, its data rates were largely stable.

We have nothing to complain about when it comes to the phone's cellular frequency coverage. The Xiaomi 14T supports a wide range of 5G and 4G bands (17 and 22 bands respectively), so it should have no problems catching a wireless signal abroad. It also works with four receiving and four transmitting channels (4x4 MIMO). The Xiaomi 14T Pro is only marginally better equipped, as the top model's wireless modem additionally supports the 4G bands 25 and 39 as well as the 5G bands 25 and 75.

Networking
Xiaomi 14T
iperf3 receive AXE11000
885 (min: 452) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1817 (min: 914) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1557 (min: 1522) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor 200 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 801) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
944 (min: 483) MBit/s ∼97%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000
880 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
922 (min: 790) MBit/s ∼95%
Realme GT 6
iperf3 receive AXE11000
816 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
837 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S24
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼89%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1786 (914-1873)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1556 (1522-1581)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (452-922)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, ARM Mali-G615 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø970 (946-993)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400, Samsung Xclipse 940; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outside
GPS reception outside

The Xiaomi 14T determines its current location using the satellite navigation services GPS (L1, L5), Galileo (E1, E5), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1, B2) and NavIC (L5), each in dual-band. As our practical test revealed, the smartphone is perfectly equipped for everyday navigation tasks. The Xiaomi 14T located us almost as accurately as the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, which served as our reference device on a 10-kilometer bike ride.

GPS test: summary
GPS test: summary
GPS test: trip around a lake
GPS test: trip around a lake
GPS test: turning point
GPS test: turning point

Telephone functions and call quality

The Xiaomi 14T comes with all of the features you'd expect from a modern smartphone when it comes to making telephone calls. Aside from dual-SIM support using two nano-SIM cards, you can also activate one eSIM. It also supports VoLTE and WLAN calls.

In terms of call quality, the Xiaomi 14T did well during our test. Voices were reproduced clearly on both ends of the line. Using hands-free mode, voices sounded a little dampened and tinny but all-in-all, there were no intelligibility issues.

Cameras - Leica triple-camera with a 50-MP resolution

Photo using the selfie camera
Photo using the selfie camera

The Xiaomi 14T features a triple-camera setup which, the same as on its predecessor, has been developed in collaboration with Leica. This means that in addition to numerous photo settings and a range of Leica filters, users can once again make use of the modes Leica Vibrant and Leica Authentic. You can select them via an icon at the top right corner of the camera app and they each work using a slightly different color calibration. We used the Vibrant mode for our test shots.

The Xiaomi 14T's main camera is the 50 MP Sony IMX906 (f/1.7, 23 mm, OIS). In addition, there is a 12 MP ultra-wide-angle camera (f/2.2, 15 mm) and a 50 MP telephoto camera (f/1.9, 50 mm). Its camera setup is completed by a 32 MP selfie camera with a fixed focus, which takes good pictures and records videos at up to 4K and 30 frames per second.

In good lighting conditions, the main camera produces nice photos that boast good image sharpness, accurate color depiction and a good amount of detail. However, its ability to capture dynamics isn't quite as good as on its sister model, the Xiaomi 14T Pro, which uses the larger Sony Light Fusion 900 as its main camera's sensor. This makes itself especially known in low-light conditions. Although the Xiaomi 14T still does better than lots of the comparison devices in this case, it can no longer capture as much detail.

The 50 MP telephoto camera works using a 2x optical zoom and a 20x digital zoom. It delivers satisfactory image quality up to a zoom factor of 5x, but beyond this it quickly becomes blurred. The ultra-wide-angle camera is the weakest of the camera trio. It shows comparatively little detail, but does a passable job overall and uses a similar white balance to the main camera.

The main camera takes good-quality videos and can record up to 4K and at 60 frames per second. If HDR is activated, a maximum of 30 frames per second is possible at 4K. You can switch between the individual lenses while recording.

Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera
Photo using main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

We took a closer look at the phone's main camera in controlled lighting conditions. Overall, it reproduced colors accurately, but struggled a bit with lighter blue tones. All-in-all, however, it didn't show any major outliers compared to the reference colors (Delta-E > 15).

ColorChecker
5.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
3 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14T: 6.7 ∆E min: 3.05 - max: 14.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
20.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
31.7 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
37.9 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
25.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 14T: 21.83 ∆E min: 7.62 - max: 37.87 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - Trial subscriptions for YouTube Premium and Spotify Premium

The Xiaomi 14T comes with a USB-C cable, a protective cover, a SIM tool, a quick-start guide and another leaflet with safety instructions. A matching 67-watt power adapter is not included. The phone is covered by a standard 12-month warranty.

In addition to the Xiaomi 14T itself, buyers also gain access to some exclusive services in countries where the phone can be purchased directly from the manufacturer. For example, they are entitled to an out-of-warranty repair and can use YouTube Premium for 3 months and Spotify Premium for 4 months free of charge.

Input devices & operation - Touch sampling rate up to 480 Hz

The Xiaomi 14T feels super smooth to operate. For one, its precise AMOLED panel runs with a touch sampling rate of up to 480 Hz, resulting in inputs being processed very quickly. The premium feeling continues thanks to its high refresh rate of 144 Hz, as content is depicted velvety smoothly. The vibration motor provides precise feedback and its intensity can be finely adjusted.

You can unlock the phone biometrically using an optical fingerprint sensor that is housed beneath the display and does its job well. Moreover, it also supports 2D facial recognition that works just as reliably as long as there is enough ambient light.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display - More than 4000 nits in HDR

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The Xiaomi 14T's 6.67-inch AMOLED panel has a resolution of 2,712 x 1,220 pixels, giving it a solid pixel density of 446 PPI, which in turn guarantees that content is depicted sharply.

By default, the AMOLED panel automatically adjusts its refresh rate to the displayed content and nominally works at up to 144 Hz. Alternatively, you can set the refresh rate manually to a maximum value of 60 Hz or 144 Hz.

When depicting a full white background, the AMOLED panel reached an average brightness of 1,016 cd/m². When the measurement was repeated with smaller image sections (APL18), its brightness increased to up to 1,680 cd/m². At the lowest brightness level, the display still shines at 2.23 cd/m².

The screen's brightness rises massively when showing HDR content. Xiaomi promises brightness levels up to 4,000 cd/m², whereas our test even yielded results up to 4,676 cd/m². As a result, the display can produce excellent HDR effects. Aside from HDR10 and HDR10+, the AMOLED panel also supports HLG and Dolby Vision.

The AMOLED screen uses pulse-width modulation (PWM) to control its brightness. It flickers at a base frequency of 120 Hz across all the brightness levels we measured, which may be an issue for sensitive users. However, the screen also works with high-frequency PWM dimming to minimize the negative effects of PWM flickering. We measured a PWM dimming frequency of 3,125 Hz, which is slightly below the maximum value of 3,840 Hz specified by Xiaomi.

993
cd/m²
1000
cd/m²
1040
cd/m²
995
cd/m²
1012
cd/m²
1050
cd/m²
1005
cd/m²
1007
cd/m²
1046
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1050 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1016.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1012 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi 14T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Honor 200 Pro
OLED, 2700x1224, 6.8"
Oppo Reno12 Pro
AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"
Realme GT 6
AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
4%
-65%
5%
-97%
-13%
Brightness middle
1012
1208
19%
1192
18%
975
-4%
1349
33%
1034
2%
Brightness
1016
1194
18%
1209
19%
974
-4%
1369
35%
1035
2%
Brightness Distribution
95
98
3%
92
-3%
98
3%
97
2%
96
1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
0.9
-29%
1.8
-157%
0.8
-14%
3.3
-371%
1.1
-57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.8
1.4
22%
4
-122%
1.4
22%
5
-178%
1.9
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1.3
-8%
2.9
-142%
0.9
25%
2.4
-100%
1.4
-17%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.29 96%
2.33 94%
2.22 99%
1.97 112%
2.22 99%
CCT
6489 100%
6413 101%
6242 104%
6467 101%
6635 98%
6674 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 19.74 %
Secondary Frequency: 3125 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
Maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).

The Xiaomi 14T's color depiction can be customized via the three profiles Original Color PRO, Vivid and Saturated. Furthermore, you can choose the color space, regulate the color temperature and activate an adaptive color mode that adjusts the display colors depending on the ambient lighting conditions. The AMOLED panel achieves the best picture quality using the Original Color PRO color profile and with the color temperature set to Warm.

Color accuracy (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color profile Original Color PRO, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.641 ms rise
↘ 0.6355 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.739 ms rise
↘ 0.78 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

The Xiaomi 14T can be used well outside. Content can still be read from the viewing-angle-stable screen even on sunny days. You just shouldn't deactivate the brightness sensor because otherwise, the screen's maximum brightness plummets to a measly 539 cd/m².

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Xiaomi 14T with a MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra

The Xiaomi 14T is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, a lower-upper-class, eight-core SoC that is manufactured using the 4 nm process. Its sister model, the Xiaomi 14T Pro, uses the slightly more powerful MediaTek Dimensity 9300+.

In terms of performance, the Xiaomi 14T proved to be roughly on par with the Honor 200 Pro and the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G—also powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra. Comparable devices such as the Samsung Galaxy S24 (Samsung Exynos 2400) and the Realme GT 6 (Snapdragon 8s Gen 3) were faster when it came to single-core and multi-core calculations. The Xiaomi 14T put in a strong performance during AI calculations and, together with the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G, came clearly ahead of the Samsung Exynos 2400 and the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3.

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points +42%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1898 Points +32%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1821 Points +26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1440 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1424 - 1440, n=2)
1432 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points -1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
541 Points -62%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points +46%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4879 Points +10%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (4423 - 4547, n=2)
4485 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4423 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -6%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1906 Points -57%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points +42%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1498 Points +37%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1413 Points +30%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1090 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1085 - 1090, n=2)
1088 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=177, last 2 years)
1039 Points -5%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
817 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points +2%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (4188 - 4279, n=2)
4234 Points +1%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4188 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4155 Points -1%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4012 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=177, last 2 years)
3470 Points -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2953 Points -29%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points +16%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1519490 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1465265 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1399064 - 1465265, n=2)
1432165 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1399064 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1329696 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -7%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
598120 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
19083 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points +20%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
16008 Points +9%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14751 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (14716 - 14751, n=2)
14734 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
12633 Points -14%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points +33%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1112 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (946 - 987, n=2)
967 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
946 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -3%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
778 Points -18%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
390 Points -59%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points +16%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8433 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
8039 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (7122 - 8039, n=2)
7581 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points -11%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6785 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -20%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4432 Points -45%
System
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (11587 - 12177, n=2)
11882 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
11587 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
11299 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points -11%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
9875 Points -15%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8990 Points -22%
Memory
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points +32%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8722 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points +1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (7735 - 7784, n=2)
7760 Points 0%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7735 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -9%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5456 Points -29%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4432 Points -43%
Graphics
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
29006 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
27809 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -4%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
25745 Points -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (16594 - 27809, n=2)
22202 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -36%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points -40%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8566 Points -69%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +14%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1734 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1676 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (1636 - 1676, n=2)
1656 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points -6%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1534 Points -8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1130 Points -33%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (57997 - 64597, n=2)
61297 Points +6%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
57997 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
27247 Points -53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -69%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
13576 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -80%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
38828 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  (33858 - 38828, n=2)
36343 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
33858 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points -35%
Realme GT 6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1163 Points -97%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -97%
Honor 200 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1122 Points -97%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
907 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  ()
907 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=41, last 2 years)
766 Points -16%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
521 Points -43%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
277 Points -69%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4516 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  ()
4516 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=41, last 2 years)
3626 Points -20%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points -77%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
321 Points -93%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=41, last 2 years)
5224 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14T
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4515 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
  ()
4515 Points 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2721 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1058 Points -77%

Although the MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra's ARM Mali-G615 MP6 graphics unit didn't quite come close to the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3's Adreno 735 or the Samsung Exynos 2400's Xclipse 940, it did still deliver strong performance—enough to make even complex games run smoothly. One example of this was the Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen test from GFXBench, which uses a similar resolution of 2,560 x 1,440 pixels as the Xiaomi 14T's AMOLED panel (2,712 x 1,220 pixels) and was mastered by the ARM GPU at 75 frames per second.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points +25%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3153 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points -2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3076 Points -2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2907 Points -8%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
844 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points +27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3079 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points 0%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3056 Points -1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2983 Points -3%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
835 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points +15%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12004 Points +9%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11983 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11001 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3135 Points -72%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points +34%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5177 Points +5%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4953 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4686 Points -5%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points +29%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5183 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5145 Points -1%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4813 Points -7%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1065 Points +3%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1036 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 Points -66%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1221 Points
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points -14%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1032 Points -15%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
352 Points -71%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7231 Points +17%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6342 Points +3%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6168 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6113 Points -1%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5382 Points -13%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5382 Points -13%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25121 Points +32%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19017 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18743 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13159 Points -31%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6698 Points -65%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6698 Points -65%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16451 Points +27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12999 Points
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12776 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10622 Points -18%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points -51%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points -51%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps +2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
455 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
454 fps
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -11%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
114 fps -75%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -50%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -51%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps +56%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
287 fps +55%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps +46%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +16%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
80 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
116 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -48%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -59%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps +37%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps +16%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
171 fps +10%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps +9%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +30%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -26%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -26%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -64%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps +20%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps +1%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -9%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +59%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -17%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps -23%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -65%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +30%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -2%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -13%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -72%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps +27%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps -2%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -35%
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -35%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps +39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +15%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps +2%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
111 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -70%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps
Realme GT 6
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
21 fps -12%
Honor 200 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20 fps -17%
Oppo Reno12 Pro
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.5 fps -73%

The MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra's mediocre browser performance (we tested Firefox and Edge as well as Chrome) doesn't match its otherwise strong performance. The reason for this is unclear. We also noticed the same discrepancy with the Xiaomi 14T Pro. On the other hand, its benchmark results, which were average at best, have nothing in common with the actual browsing experience, as web pages are opened quickly and can be scrolled through swiftly.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points +90%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points +82%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +76%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (70.6 - 134, n=2)
102.3 Points +45%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
94.736 Points +34%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
70.555 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
60.18 Points -15%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
59.665 Points -15%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min +128%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
180 runs/min +54%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (117 - 180, n=2)
148.5 runs/min +27%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +23%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
117 runs/min
Realme GT 6
103 runs/min -12%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
76.5 runs/min -35%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
65.9 runs/min -44%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min +80%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
6.62 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ()
6.62 runs/min 0%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
5.6 runs/min -15%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
5.18 runs/min -22%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
3.54 runs/min -47%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +71%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points +36%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (103 - 140, n=2)
121.5 Points +18%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +14%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
103 Points
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
101 Points -2%
Honor 200 Pro (Chrome 126)
61 Points -41%
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
56 Points -46%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points +78%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (35853 - 46286, n=2)
41070 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +8%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
35853 Points
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
31742 Points -11%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
30234 Points -16%
Honor 200 Pro
28536 Points -20%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Oppo Reno12 Pro (chrome 127)
2154.2 ms * -13%
Xiaomi 14T (Chrome 130.0.6723.73)
1899.3 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +20%
Honor 200 Pro
1456.4 ms * +23%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra (1007 - 1899, n=2)
1453 ms * +23%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
1221.4 ms * +36%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * +47%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * +65%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 4.0 storage gives the Xiaomi 14T a high data throughput, ensuring that loading times are kept short. Even large apps such as the PUBG Mobile APK file (2 GB) were installed super quickly during our test.

Xiaomi 14THonor 200 ProOppo Reno12 ProRealme GT 6Samsung Galaxy S24Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-41%
-47%
-12%
-31%
0%
-4%
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB
3605.16
1992.32
-45%
1777.39
-51%
3452.12
-4%
3701.23
3%
3824.7
6%
Sequential Write 256KB
3294.31
1644.98
-50%
1700.51
-48%
3211.78
-3%
1435.39
-56%
3642.57
11%
Random Read 4KB
403.97
276.23
-32%
228.05
-44%
315.76
-22%
373.12
-8%
355.7
-12%
Random Write 4KB
493.57
321.09
-35%
265.4
-46%
397.65
-19%
175.98
-64%
467.74
-5%

Games - Current games run smoothly

The Xiaomi 14T has no problem depicting current games smoothly. For example, it managed to run the graphically-demanding game Genshin Impact at a buttery smooth nearly 60fps even with the maximum graphic details selected.

The MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra's ARM Mali-G615 MP6 GPU could deliver even more frames per second, however, it is limited by Genshin Impact due to energy-saving reasons. The same thing happened during our second test game, PUBG Mobile, in which the phone limited the frame rate to a mere 40fps when using the highest graphics setting UltraHD/Ultra. Using the lowest setting Smooth, on the other hand, resulted in up to 90fps.

We measured the game frame rates using our test tool Gamebench.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø59.4 (54-61)
Xiaomi 14T; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.1.0_27118081_27297621: Ø59.1 (49-61)
Xiaomi 14T; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.4.0: Ø89.2 (84-91)
Xiaomi 14T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.4.0: Ø59.2 (51-61)
Xiaomi 14T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.4.0: Ø39.6 (37-41)

Emissions - Hardly any heat development and somewhat poor sound

Temperature

Even under load, the Xiaomi 14T never feels uncomfortably warm to hold in your hand. We only measured a maximum of 41.3 °C on the smartphone's surface after the extreme scenario, which consisted of one hour of full CPU and GPU load using the Burnout benchmark.

On the other hand, the 3DMark stress test scenarios—which simulate typical game scenes—showed that an internal reduction in the system performance did happen at times. When the SoC got too hot under load, then its performance was throttled by 25-33%. In 3DMark, this mostly already happened after the first stress test run.

Max. Load
 40.9 °C
106 F
41.3 °C
106 F
39.5 °C
103 F
 
 40.6 °C
105 F
40.8 °C
105 F
39.7 °C
103 F
 
 40.9 °C
106 F
40.9 °C
106 F
39.5 °C
103 F
 
Maximum: 41.3 °C = 106 F
Average: 40.5 °C = 105 F
38.9 °C
102 F
40 °C
104 F
40.3 °C
105 F
37.6 °C
100 F
39.7 °C
103 F
41.1 °C
106 F
36.4 °C
98 F
39.4 °C
103 F
38.4 °C
101 F
Maximum: 41.1 °C = 106 F
Average: 39.1 °C = 102 F
Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % 0%
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.4 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -15%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.5 %
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 % -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -13%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 14T
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 %
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.6 (12-17.8)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.7 (43.9-58.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.9 (44-65.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø12.2 (11.1-16.6)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)
Xiaomi 14T Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø6.23 (6.01-9)
Xiaomi 14T
Xiaomi 14T

Speakers

The Xiaomi 14T's stereo speakers offer hardly any bass but boast balanced mids and highs, which means that vocals in particular are transported very well. Even at full volume, the Dolby Atmos-compatible speakers don't distort the sound and are loud enough to fill an entire room.

External audio devices can be connected to the smartphone via USB-C or wirelessly via Bluetooth 5.4. The Xiaomi 14T supports many Bluetooth codecs, including AAC, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX TWS+ and LHDC V5.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.239.12526.838.23123.636.34022.333.85027.535.16320.536.98020.738.310019.340.312515.741.716013.652.820016.25225015.556.931515.156.340010.958.25009.965.263012.164.380014.167100014.276125012.979.6160014.276.9200012.779.9250012.779.4315013.581.7400013.183.6500013.181630013.480800012.778.81000013.477.11250013.474.31600013.160.9SPL25.491.4N0.784.7median 13.4median 76Delta1.11036.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 14TSamsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 14T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Charging at up to 67 watts

Power consumption

The Xiaomi 14T's 5,000 mAh battery can be charged at up to 67 watts. Xiaomi has stated that the lithium-ion battery should still have retained 80% of its capacity after 1,600 charging cycles.

According to the manufacturer, the phone takes 45 minutes to charge using the official 67-watt power supply from Xiaomi, which wasn't available to us during the test. The HyperCharge function must first be activated in the battery settings for this.

However, we were unable to select HyperCharge in our test as we used a third-party power supply (Anker 317, 100 watts). Charging then took 1:06 hours. It reached a charge level of 80% after 34 minutes, and 90% after 41 minutes.

Overall, the Xiaomi 14T runs quite frugally and consumes comparatively little power under load. However, its power consumption increases significantly under maximum load.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.12 / 0.33 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.97 / 1.12 / 1.19 Watt
Load midlight 4.13 / 12.25 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh
Realme GT 6
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-70%
7%
-26%
-45%
-47%
-24%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
0.97
1.11
-14%
0.69
29%
1.01
-4%
0.42
57%
1.11
-14%
Idle Average *
1.12
2.67
-138%
1.42
-27%
1.09
3%
0.93
17%
1.14
-2%
Idle Maximum *
1.19
2.75
-131%
1.47
-24%
1.16
3%
1.07
10%
1.16
3%
Load Average *
4.13
8.13
-97%
3.05
26%
9.86
-139%
15.43
-274%
12.33
-199%
8.23 ?(4.13 - 12.3, n=2)
-99%
Load Maximum *
12.25
8.64
29%
8.25
33%
11.64
5%
16.51
-35%
15.34
-25%
13.8 ?(12.3 - 15.3, n=2)
-13%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.21 (1.017-12.1)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.41 (0.99-10.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.852 (0.783-1.069)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.4 (8.46-12.7)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.69 (7.88-8.74)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Xiaomi 14T MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.852 (0.783-1.069)
Honor 200 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.414 (1.33-1.67)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Runtimes

During our test, the Xiaomi 14T performed very well in terms of battery life, coming in slightly above the class average overall. Our test scenarios at an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m² resulted in a runtime of just over 18 hours of simulated web surfing and almost 22 hours of video playback.

Among the comparison devices, only the Realme GT 6 achieved slightly better runtimes, although it also has the advantage of a higher-capacity battery. The Samsung Galaxy S24 and the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G, on the other hand, had slightly less endurance than the Xiaomi 14T.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 36min
WiFi Websurfing
18h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 37min
Xiaomi 14T
5000 mAh
Honor 200 Pro
5200 mAh
Oppo Reno12 Pro
5000 mAh
Realme GT 6
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
-10%
5%
-9%
-9%
Reader / Idle
2016
1876
-7%
2398
19%
1815
-10%
H.264
1313
1723
31%
1227
-7%
967
-26%
WiFi v1.3
1091
993
-9%
986
-10%
1155
6%
880
-19%
942
-14%
Load
217
198
-9%
159
-27%
251
16%

Notebookcheck total rating

The Xiaomi 14T offers a lot of features and performance for comparatively little money. It delivers nearly upper-class performance combined with a very bright AMOLED panel, 144 Hz frame rate, good triple camera and long battery runtimes.

Xiaomi 14T - 11/08/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
88%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
52 / 69 → 75%