Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek Dimensity 9400+

Mediatek Dimensity 9400+

The Mediatek Dimensity 9400 Plus is a higher-end octa-core SoC for Android tablets and smartphones that was launched on April 10, 2025. As such, it is said to feature one powerful Cortex-X925 core (up to 3.73 GHz), three Cortex-X4 cores (up to 3.3 GHz) and four efficient Cortex-A720 cores (up to 2.4 GHz) along with the dedicated 890 NPU and Immortalis-G925 MC12 iGPU. The older Dimensity 9400 features the same key components, their lower clock speeds being the differentiating factor.

A chip for flagship 2025 and 2026 products, the Dimensity comes with powerful navigation and networking capabilities, including Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 and other nice features such as support for three displays. It is built with TSMC's N3E process.

Performance

Given the clock speed improvement over the Dimensity 9400, its Geekbench multi-thread performance scores should be slightly higher than those of Apple's M1 and A18 Pro as well as Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 Elite.

Long-term performance sustainability will depend greatly on how sound heat dissipation is in a particular tablet or smartphone.

CodenameCortex-X925, X4, A720
SeriesMediatek Dimensity 9000

Series: Dimensity 9000 Cortex-X925, X4, A720

Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ « 2.4 - 3.73 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400 compare2 - 3.62 GHz8 / 8 cores22 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Mediatek Dimensity 9400e compare2 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores22 MB L3 Cortex-X925, X4, A720
Clock Rate2400 - 3730 MHz
Level 2 Cache3.5 MB
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 3.7 GHz ARM Cortex-X925
3 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Features5G, Wi-Fi 7, BT 6.0, UFS 4, LPDDR5X-10667 RAM, NPU 890
GPUARM Immortalis-G925 MC12
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date04/10/2025
Product Link (external)www.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2478     avg: 2657     median: 2652 (61%)     max: 2798 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 7749     avg: 8195     median: 8040 (31%)     max: 9043 points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1844     avg: 1870     median: 1869.5 (63%)     max: 1895 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6607     avg: 7149     median: 7149 (13%)     max: 7691 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9867 points (99%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
28034 points (27%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 391     avg: 707     median: 611.6 (1%)     max: 1140.4 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 33868     avg: 58165     median: 36745 (24%)     max: 94555 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 109     avg: 160.8     median: 114 (30%)     max: 235 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 2396590     avg: 2571980     median: 2511790 (72%)     max: 2841840 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 518937     avg: 569805     median: 572789 (57%)     max: 607545 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 82.4     avg: 99.4     median: 85.5 (55%)     max: 144.32 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 677     avg: 2099     median: 2326.7 (66%)     max: 3065.26 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 38.1     avg: 52     median: 51.1 (25%)     max: 67.63 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 1549     avg: 1658     median: 1654.4 (41%)     max: 1775 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 37732     avg: 99518     median: 102656 (45%)     max: 155027 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 16985     avg: 17710     median: 17754.5 (62%)     max: 18344 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
0 Points (0%)
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 6.21     avg: 8.5     median: 8.8 (4%)     max: 11.8 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0.778     avg: 2.8     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 4.41 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 16. 23:27:18

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Feb 2026 18:08:08 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.016s ... 0.019s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.019s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 18618 +0.012s ... 0.031s

#7 got single benchmarks 18618 +0.016s ... 0.046s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#9 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.415s ... 0.461s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.063s ... 0.525s

#11 return log +0.814s ... 1.339s

Reviews for the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ processor

Xiaomi 15T Pro review – an underrated gem among camera phones

Xiaomi 15T Pro review – an underrated gem among camera phones

The Xiaomi 15T Pro aims to stand out in its price range with its versatile camera setup and largely succeeds. It also offers many high-end features, although a few gaps remain in its specifications list.
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.83", 210 g
Xiaomi Pad Mini

Cheaper, faster and more modern than the Apple iPad Mini - Xiaomi Pad Mini tablet review

The small 8.8-inch Xiaomi Pad Mini delivers performance and features you’d usually expect only from high-end smartphones. It offers up to 512 GB of storage and, with its Dimensity 9400+ chip, can even outperform the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 in some cases. The tablet also features a stunning 3K display with a 165 Hz refresh rate and delivers excellent battery life despite its compact size.
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 8.8", 326 g
The premium tablet for work, entertainment and all things creative - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G review

The premium tablet for work, entertainment and all things creative - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G review

The Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra 5G is a super-slim high-end tablet with a huge display, powerful performance, and versatile features. Whether for work, creativity or entertainment, it aims to set new standards. We tested whether it can truly live up to these high expectations.
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 14.6", 695 g
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 tablet review (image source: Marcus Herbrich)

A superb tablet experience with caveats - Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 review

Samsung's compact flagship tablet offers the best hardware, long updates, and, of course, the new S Pen. Read our review of the Android tablet to find out whether we are bowled over by the Galaxy Tab S11 and its 11-inch OLED screen. Interestingly, the Samsung tablet definitely has one thing that puts it ahead of its Chinese competitors.
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 11", 469 g
Review: Xiaomi Redmi K Pad

Enthusiasts have long awaited the arrival of this ultra-light tablet featuring dual USB ports – Xiaomi Redmi K Pad review

It's unfortunate that this device is currently limited to regional availability. With a high-end SoC at its core, the compact Xiaomi Redmi K Pad delivers performance on par with modern flagship smartphones, making it a strong contender against iPad Mini (2024). Xiaomi has also equipped the tablet with premium features including a 165 Hz display, stylus support, Wi-Fi 7 and two USB ports, which are rare in this size class.
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 8.8", 326 g

Oppo Pad 5: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12.10", 0.6 kg
  External Review » Oppo Pad 5

Xiaomi Pad Mini: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 8.80", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Pad Mini

Xiaomi 15T Pro: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi 15T Pro

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 11.00", 0.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra

Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.78", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+

Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra

Xiaomi Redmi K Pad: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 8.80", 0.3 kg
  External Review » Xiaomi Redmi K Pad

Oppo Find X8s: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.32", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Oppo Find X8s

Vivo X200s: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
  External Review » Vivo X200s

OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.83", 0.2 kg
  External Review » OnePlus Ace 5 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: Is it worth switching from the Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra?

   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra - Thinner, lighter, smarter

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » 4 reasons why the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 could be a disappointment for some users

   » Why the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 would have been better as a Galaxy Tab S20

   » The new Samsung S Pen for the Galaxy Tab S11 series is awesome and controversial in design

   » Leak: Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra may be as thin as Apple's iPad Pro 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Leak: Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra may be as thin as Apple's iPad Pro 13

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 11.00", 0.5 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, Tab S11 Ultra and Tab S10 Lite: All Euro prices, specs and configurations leaked

Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 Ultra: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 14.60", 0.7 kg
   » Samsung Galaxy Tab S11, Tab S11 Ultra and Tab S10 Lite: All Euro prices, specs and configurations leaked

Vivo X200s: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.67", 0.2 kg
   » Vivo launches X200s: Slim flagship with three 50 MP Zeiss cameras and 6,200 mAh battery

   » Official: Vivo X200 Ultra launch date confirmed alongside first press photo

Oppo Find X8s: ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12, 6.32", 0.2 kg
   » Oppo Find X8 Ultra news roundup: Impressive Hasselblad camera samples, official packaging and new teasers

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google

» Mobile CPU Comparison
Comparison of all mobile CPU series

» Mobile Processors - Benchmarklist
Benchmarklist of all known CPUs that are used in laptops (desktop and laptop CPUs)

Other CPUs of the series Dimensity 9000

» MediaTek Dimensity 9500
   8x 2.7 GHz - 4.21 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
   8x 2.4 GHz - 3.73 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400
   8x 2 GHz - 3.62 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9300
   8x 2 GHz - 3.25 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.35 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9200
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz
» MediaTek Dimensity 9000
   8x 1.8 GHz - 3.05 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
   8x 3.53 GHz - 4.47 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
   8x 3.53 GHz - 4.32 GHz
+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
   8x 3.32 GHz - 3.8 GHz
+ Apple A19
   6x 2.6 GHz - 4.26 GHz
+ Xiaomi Xring O1
   10x 1.8 GHz - 3.9 GHz
» Mediatek Dimensity 9400+
   8x 2.4 GHz - 3.73 GHz
- Mediatek Dimensity 9400
   8x 2 GHz - 3.62 GHz
- Mediatek Dimensity 9400e
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
- Samsung Exynos 2500
   10x 1.8 GHz - 3.3 GHz
- Apple M1
   8x 2.06 GHz - 3.22 GHz
- MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
   8x 2 GHz - 3.4 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2026-01- 8)