Xiaomi Redmi A1+
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2
Price comparison
Average of 1 scores (from 2 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Redmi A1+
Source: The Indian Express
If you are in the market for a budget phone and cannot afford to spend more than Rs 9,000, the new Redmi A1+ is an option to consider, given stock Android and its overall specifications. However, be prepared, this is a budget phone and temper your expectations around its performance. If your budget is flexible and you can increase it by Rs 1000 to Rs 2,000, I would suggest you look at other options from Redmi, Realme, and Samsung before making your decision.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/18/2022
Rating: Total score: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Viettelstore VN→EN
Positive: Decent performance; nice cameras; elegant design; attractive price.
Hands-On, online available, Medium, Date: 11/22/2022
Comment
Imagination PowerVR GE8300: Integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Helio A22 MT6761: ARM based quad core SoC (8x ARM Cortex-A53) clocked at up to 2 GHz. The chip also includes a Cat.7 LTE modem (300 Mbps download).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.52":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Xiaomi:
Founded in 2010, Xiaomi Corporation is a Chinese multinational electronics company and produces consumer electronics and related products, including smartphones, televisions, fitness bands, power banks, headphones, smart devices and accessories. Xiaomi offers its products under the Mi, Redmi and POCO brands.
70%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.