Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Mali-G52 MP1 vs ARM Mali-G71 MP8

ARM Mali-G52 MP1

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G52 MP1

The ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (or G52MC1) is an integrated mid-range graphics card for ARM based SoCs (mostly Android based Tablets). It was introduced mid 2020 in the MediaTek MT8168 with a clock speed of up to 800 MHz.

The G52 is based on the Bifrost architecture and is intended for mainstream phones. ARM claims that the G52 series offers 30% more performance density and 15% better energy efficiency compared to the ARM Mali G51 series.

The performance of the G52MP2 in our benchmarks (in the MediaTek MT8168) is clearly below the G52 MP2 version in the entry level. That means its not well suited for demanding 3D Android games like PUBG Mobile.

The GPU supports all modern graphics APIs like OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.0, OpenCL 2.0 and Renderscript.

ARM Mali-G71 MP8

► remove from comparison ARM Mali-G71 MP8

The ARM Mali-G71 MP8 is an integrated high-end graphics adapter for ARM SoCs, which was used in combination with the smartphone and tablet chip HiSilicon Kirin 960 in November 2016 for the first time. Based on initial benchmarks, the GPU performance is slightly better compared to the Adreno 530 in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 821. It is therefore one of the most powerful graphics units for (Android) devices in the end of 2016.

show full text
ARM Mali-G52 MP1ARM Mali-G71 MP8
Mali-G Series
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
Mali-G78 MP24 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP22 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP20 compare 24
Mali-G78 MP14 compare 14
Mali-G77 MP11 compare 11
Mali-G77 MP9 compare 9
Mali-G76 MP16 compare 16
Mali-G76 MP12 compare 10
Mali-G76 MP10 compare 10 @ 0.72 GHz
Mali-G68 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G57 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G57 MP5 compare 5
Mali-G72 MP18 compare 18 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP20 compare 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G72 MP12 compare 12 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G71 MP8 8 @ 0.9 GHz
Mali-G76 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G71 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.77 GHz
Mali-G72 MP3 compare 3 @ 0.85 GHz
Mali-G68 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G52 MP6 compare 6
Mali-G68 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G52 MP2 compare 2 @ 0.95 GHz
Mali-G52 MP1 1 @ 0.8 GHz
Mali-G57 MP4 compare 4
Mali-G57 MP3 compare 3
Mali-G57 MP2 compare 2
Mali-G57 MP1 compare 1
Mali-G51 MP4 compare 4 @ 0.65 GHz
ArchitectureBifrostBifrost
Pipelines1 - unified8 - unified
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz900 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memorynono
technology12 nm16 nm
Date of Announcement29.07.2020 03.06.2016
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://developer.arm.com/ip-products/gr...https://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/...
CodenameMimir
APIOpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Mali-G52 MP1GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC T6128 x 1800 MHz614 MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 8508 x ? MHz? MHz? MHz
JLQ JR5108 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
MediaTek MT81684 x 2000 MHz? MHz800 MHz
min. - max.? - 614 MHz800 MHz
CPU in Mali-G71 MP8GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
HiSilicon Kirin 9608 x 2400 MHz? MHz900 MHz
HiSilicon Kirin 960s8 x 2100 MHz? MHz900 MHz
min. - max.? - 614 MHz800 - 900 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 13089     avg: 14037     median: 13379.5 (2%)     max: 16301 Points
min: 32243     avg: 35201     median: 35210 (4%)     max: 38979 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 950     avg: 1287     median: 1275 (7%)     max: 2142 Points
min: 1900     avg: 2396     median: 2399 (13%)     max: 2894 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 834     avg: 1165     median: 1143.5 (3%)     max: 2001 Points
min: 1848     avg: 2494     median: 2463.5 (6%)     max: 3241 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 605     avg: 893     median: 915 (6%)     max: 1516 Points
min: 1600     avg: 1994     median: 2011 (12%)     max: 2368 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 508     avg: 766     median: 787.5 (3%)     max: 1339 Points
min: 1511     avg: 1957     median: 1967.5 (7%)     max: 2380 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 410     avg: 470.6     median: 426 (0%)     max: 716 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 111     avg: 126.7     median: 117 (0%)     max: 181 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.6     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.96 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 1.4     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (0%)     max: 3.7 fps
min: 4.7     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (1%)     max: 7 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 3.9     avg: 5.9     median: 5.9 (0%)     max: 11 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.5     median: 11.5 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.2     avg: 5.9     median: 6 (1%)     max: 8.8 fps
min: 15     avg: 15.7     median: 15 (2%)     max: 18 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 6.6     avg: 9.4     median: 9.4 (0%)     max: 15 fps
min: 18     avg: 23.3     median: 23 (0%)     max: 28 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 11     avg: 15.6     median: 16 (1%)     max: 26 fps
min: 19     avg: 33.3     median: 32 (2%)     max: 44 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G52 MP1
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 19     avg: 24.8     median: 24 (0%)     max: 42 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-G71 MP8
min: 43     avg: 71.9     median: 73.5 (1%)     max: 96 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 0     avg: 16041     median: 22462 (3%)     max: 25274 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 31104     avg: 34536     median: 34536 (78%)     max: 37968 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 42176     avg: 42979     median: 42979 (96%)     max: 43782 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 9.57     avg: 12.7     median: 12.7 (0%)     max: 15.81 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3562     avg: 15210     median: 15410 (15%)     max: 24108 Points
min: 10073     avg: 10164     median: 10164 (10%)     max: 10255 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1293     avg: 10223     median: 11400 (20%)     max: 16564 Points
min: 1909     avg: 1915     median: 1915 (3%)     max: 1921 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 3.3     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 7.07 Watt

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 207% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
27.5 29.5 30 32 33 40 56 59 ~ 38 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
19 20 25 28 30 36 39 39 40 ~ 31 fps
med.
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
24 37 ~ 31 fps
high
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
16 17.5 21 27.5 28 29 30 30 30 33 ~ 26 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
30  fps
197%
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 ~ 44 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 58 60 ~ 49 fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
low
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 ~ 59 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
58 60 60 ~ 59 fps
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
19  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
30 45 56 60 ~ 48 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
27  fps
111%
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
high
Mali-G71 MP8:
29 29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
28 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Mali-G52 MP1:
17 25.5 29 ~ 24 fps

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G52 MP1 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-G71 MP8 → 154%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 197%

ARM Mali-G71 MP8lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Armajet38
PUBG Mobile313126
Arena of Valor30
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)19
Asphalt 8: Airborne27
Asphalt 9: Legends2924
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
2


1

2
1










ARM Mali-G71 MP8lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Arena of Valor5959
Shadow Fight 34449
Battle Bay5959
Dead Trigger 248
Asphalt 8: Airborne3030
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4





4


1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2023, 2022
v1.25
log 29. 09:51:45

#0 checking url part for id 10459 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7648 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:58:45 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.08s ... 0.081s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.081s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.081s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10459 +0.028s ... 0.109s

#8 got single benchmarks 10459 +0.029s ... 0.138s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7648 +0.002s ... 0.14s

#10 got single benchmarks 7648 +0.017s ... 0.156s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.156s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.088s ... 0.244s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.244s

#14 Got 64 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.26s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.26s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.264s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.022s ... 0.286s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.286s

#19 return log +0.057s ... 0.343s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)