HP 255 G6-4LT47ES
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Reviews for the HP 255 G6-4LT47ES
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/26/2019
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 61% features: 89% display: 69% mobility: 63% ergonomy: 63%
Comment
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge): Integrated graphics adapter of some AMD-A dual-core APUs ("Stoney Ridge"). Based on the GCN architecture, implements 192 shader units and runs at up to 600 MHz depending on the model. The performance can vary heavily depending on the TDP (10-15 Watts for the whole chip).
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
A6-9225: Entry-level APU of the Stoney-Ridge series released in 2018. Integrates 2 CPU cores (1 module with two integer and one FP unit) clocked at 2.6 to 3.1 GHz and an AMD Radeon R4 graphics adapter clocked at up to 686 MHz. Compared to the one year older A6-9220, the A6-9225 has a 200 MHz higher CPU Boost clock but a slower iGPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
15.60":
15-inch display variants are the standard and are used for more than half of all laptops.
The reason for the popularity of mid-sized displays is that this size is reasonably easy on the eyes, often allows high resolutions and thus offers rich details on the screen, yet does not consume too much power and the devices can still be reasonably compact - simply the standard compromise.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.HP: Founded in 1939, the US company is a major server and printer manufacturer and one of the leading IT companies in the world. Until 2015, the company was called Hewlett-Packard Company. After a split, the computer division was renamed HP Inc.
In 2023, HP had an approximate market share of 22% of global PC sales, making it number 2 after Lenovo.
70%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
