Notebookcheck Logo

Dell Precision 5750 Workstation Review: The XPS 17 For Professionals

Xeon and Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q support. Turning a high-performance Ultrabook into a workstation isn't new, but the Precision 5750 is one-of-a-kind for its 16:10 aspect ratio and thin design that other 17-inch workstations don't offer.

Much like how the 15.6-inch Precision 5550 is the workstation version of the XPS 15 9500, the 17.3-inch Precision 5750 is the workstation version of the XPS 17 9700. We recommend checking out our review on the XPS 17 as all our existing comments on the chassis and its physical features also apply here on the Precision 5750.

Our unit is a top-end configuration with the Xeon W-10885M CPU, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q GPU, 16:10 2400p glossy touchscreen, and 32 GB DDR4 RAM for approximately $3800 USD. Lesser SKUs with the Core i5-10400H, integrated UHD Graphics 630, 1200p matte display, and 8 GB of RAM are also available for much less.

The Precision 5750 competes against 17.3-inch ultra-thin workstations like the MSI WS75, Razer Blade Pro Studio, or the Asus ProArt StudioBook series.

More Dell reviews:

Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F (Precision 5000 Series)
Processor
Intel Xeon W-10885M 8 x 2.4 - 5.3 GHz, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 765 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 442.23, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, Micron DDR4-3200, 21-21-21-47, Dual-Channel
Display
17.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 266 PPI, 10-point capacitive, Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, SHP14D6, Dell P/N: 7JXK8, glossy: yes, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM490 (Comet Lake PCH-H)
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 4 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 4 Thunderbolt, 4 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.5 x 374.45 x 248.05 ( = 0.77 x 14.74 x 9.77 in)
Battery
97 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.5 W x2 + 1.5 W x2, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, USB-C to HDMI and USB-A adapter, Dell PremierColor, Optimizer, Command, Power Manager, Digital Delivery, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.516 kg ( = 88.75 oz / 5.55 pounds), Power Supply: 429 g ( = 15.13 oz / 0.95 pounds)
Price
3800 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87 %
09/2020
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2.5 kg19.5 mm17.00"3840x2400
86.4 %
05/2020
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2.5 kg18.4 mm17.00"1920x1200
83.8 %
06/2019
MSI WS75 9TL-636
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
2.3 kg18.95 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.7 %
05/2019
Dell Precision 7730
i7-8850H, Quadro P3200
3.3 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.6 %
12/2019
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
3.5 kg31 mm17.30"1920x1080
84.8 %
11/2019
MSI WE75 9TK
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
2.6 kg27.5 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case

416 mm / 16.4 inch 281 mm / 11.1 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 3.5 kg7.62 lbs414 mm / 16.3 inch 274 mm / 10.8 inch 30 mm / 1.181 inch 3.3 kg7.38 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 268.5 mm / 10.6 inch 27.5 mm / 1.083 inch 2.6 kg5.73 lbs396.1 mm / 15.6 inch 259.5 mm / 10.2 inch 18.95 mm / 0.746 inch 2.3 kg4.99 lbs382 mm / 15 inch 286 mm / 11.3 inch 18.4 mm / 0.724 inch 2.5 kg5.47 lbs374.45 mm / 14.7 inch 248.05 mm / 9.77 inch 19.5 mm / 0.768 inch 2.5 kg5.55 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity

Port options are either disappointing or amazing depending on what you're looking for. If you like having 4x Thunderbolt 3 ports, then this Precision has got you covered. If you want HDMI, RJ-45 or USB-A, then be prepared to rely on adapters or docking stations. Every other workstation in this size category offers a wider variety of integrated ports than the Precision 5750.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, SD card reader, 3.5 mm combo audio
Right: 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3, SD card reader, 3.5 mm combo audio
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Wedge lock, 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3
Left: Wedge lock, 2x USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3

SD Card Reader

Transfer rates from the integrated SD card reader are very fast. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes about 7 seconds.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Precision 7730
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187 MB/s +21%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
184 MB/s +19%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
180 MB/s +17%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
154 MB/s
MSI WE75 9TK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
26.5 MB/s -83%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
244.1 MB/s +29%
Dell Precision 7730
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212.8 MB/s +12%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
209.2 MB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206.3 MB/s +9%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
189.8 MB/s
MSI WE75 9TK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
31.57 MB/s -83%

Communication

The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 connectivity. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.

The WLAN module is integrated and not user-removable
The WLAN module is integrated and not user-removable
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1595 (1327min - 1824max) MBit/s +70%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1476 (1355min - 1581max) MBit/s +57%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1037 (976min - 1071max) MBit/s +10%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (507min - 1065max) MBit/s +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
941 (763min - 1176max) MBit/s
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
840 (769min - 903max) MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1404 (717min - 1487max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1368 (735min - 1454max) MBit/s +6%
Dell Precision 7550
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1316 (579min - 1479max) MBit/s +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1286 (1229min - 1366max) MBit/s
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
905 (752min - 950max) MBit/s -30%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
899 (873min - 913max) MBit/s -30%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1286 (1229-1366)
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (763-1176)

Webcam

ColorChecker
7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
1.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F: 7.94 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 14.51 ∆E

Security

The same security features available on the Precision 5550 can be found here on the Precision 5750 including the Proximity sensor for hands-free ExpressSign-in. There is still no webcam shutter at all which we think was an oversight from Dell during the design phase of the XPS 17/Precision 5750 chassis.

Maintenance

A T5 Torx wrench and sharp edge are required to remove the bottom panel. Users have access to 2x SODIMM and 2x M.2 storage bays
A T5 Torx wrench and sharp edge are required to remove the bottom panel. Users have access to 2x SODIMM and 2x M.2 storage bays

Accessories and Warranty

A USB-C to HDMI and USB-A adapter is included in every box. Standard warranty is one year only compared to three years on traditional full-size workstations like the Precision 7550.

Input Devices

No NumPad unlike most larger traditional workstations
No NumPad unlike most larger traditional workstations
Clickpad is huge (15 x 9 cm), but the lack of dedicated mouse buttons impacts precision
Clickpad is huge (15 x 9 cm), but the lack of dedicated mouse buttons impacts precision
Travel is shallower and with lighter feedback than the keyboard on the thicker Precision 7750.
Travel is shallower and with lighter feedback than the keyboard on the thicker Precision 7750.
Small Up/Dn arrow keys. It's a barebones keyboard from the perspective of a 17-inch mobile workstation
Small Up/Dn arrow keys. It's a barebones keyboard from the perspective of a 17-inch mobile workstation

Display

Dell uses the same Sharp LQ170R1 IPS panel and SHP14D6 controller for both the XPS 17 and Precision 5750 for the same visual experience between the two models. When compared to the displays on most other workstations, the XPS 17 offers an uncommon 16:10 aspect ratio with both touchscreen and crisper images due to the glossy overlay. It's also brighter at almost 500 nits compared to the ~300 nit average.

Response times are relatively slow for noticeable ghosting, but that is common on 4K laptop panels.

Edge-to-edge Gorilla Glass
Edge-to-edge Gorilla Glass
Some of the narrowest bezels for a 17-inch workstation
Some of the narrowest bezels for a 17-inch workstation
Crisp subpixels and image quality due to the glossy overlay
Crisp subpixels and image quality due to the glossy overlay
Minimal uneven backlight bleeding
Minimal uneven backlight bleeding
Become familiar with Dell PremierColor for adjusting color profiles and contrast
Become familiar with Dell PremierColor for adjusting color profiles and contrast
462.2
cd/m²
446.9
cd/m²
442.4
cd/m²
457.6
cd/m²
483.8
cd/m²
435.6
cd/m²
438.2
cd/m²
486.5
cd/m²
456.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ170R1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 486.5 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 456.6 cd/m² Minimum: 31.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 483.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 1308:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.01
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
86.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
97.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 17.00, 3840x2400
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
170PUW1-A00, IPS, 17.00, 1920x1200
MSI WS75 9TL-636
B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Dell Precision 7730
B173HAN01.3, IPS LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
N173HCE-E31, IPS LED, 17.30, 1920x1080
MSI WE75 9TK
AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Display
1%
-22%
-20%
-19%
-23%
Display P3 Coverage
83.6
96.2
15%
64.5
-23%
65
-22%
67.5
-19%
63.2
-24%
sRGB Coverage
99.7
99.8
0%
91.1
-9%
93.4
-6%
94.2
-6%
89.9
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97.7
84.7
-13%
65.8
-33%
66.3
-32%
67.8
-31%
64.3
-34%
Response Times
7%
11%
-7%
11%
17%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
41.2 ?(18.4, 22.8)
41.2 ?(22, 19.2)
-0%
39.2 ?(19.6, 19.6)
5%
48.8 ?(24.4, 24.4)
-18%
40 ?(20.4, 19.6)
3%
30.8 ?(14.4, 16.4)
25%
Response Time Black / White *
34 ?(20, 14)
29.6 ?(16.4, 13.2)
13%
28.4 ?(15.6, 12.8)
16%
32.8 ?(18.8, 14)
4%
28 ?(17.2, 10.8)
18%
31.2 ?(18.8, 12.4)
8%
PWM Frequency
25000 ?(50)
Screen
17%
-3%
12%
-12%
0%
Brightness middle
483.8
323
-33%
300
-38%
322
-33%
333
-31%
287.3
-41%
Brightness
457
308
-33%
288
-37%
316
-31%
310
-32%
280
-39%
Brightness Distribution
90
88
-2%
86
-4%
84
-7%
83
-8%
89
-1%
Black Level *
0.37
0.36
3%
0.25
32%
0.24
35%
0.39
-5%
0.26
30%
Contrast
1308
897
-31%
1200
-8%
1342
3%
854
-35%
1105
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.27
1.1
74%
3.9
9%
2.2
48%
4.4
-3%
2.98
30%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.78
3.3
62%
6
32%
4.6
48%
7.5
15%
5.08
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.01
0.8
80%
2.3
43%
1.9
53%
2
50%
3.06
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
0.8
77%
4.3
-23%
1.6
54%
5.1
-46%
3
14%
Gamma
2.43 91%
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.19 100%
2.39 92%
2.28 96%
CCT
1741 373%
6479 100%
7391 88%
6621 98%
7061 92%
6993 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
86.7
75.7
-13%
59.2
-32%
60.4
-30%
61.1
-30%
58.1
-33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.9
99.8
0%
91
-9%
93.3
-7%
94
-6%
89.5
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
8% / 12%
-5% / -5%
-5% / 4%
-7% / -10%
-2% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers all of sRGB and approximately 87 percent of the 3D AdobeRGB space which is standard for most 4K UHD panels. Lesser FHD options typically cover about 60 percent of AdobeRGB only.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

X-Rite measurements show a decently calibrated display out of the box. Calibrating the panel further ourselves would improve colors and RGB balance, but only by slight margins.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 22.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18110 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is better than many other 17-inch workstations due to the brighter backlight. However, glare from the glossy panel negates much of that advantage. Users cannot configure both matte and 4K UHD simultaneously.

Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Almost no color degradation even if viewing from wide angles
Almost no color degradation even if viewing from wide angles

Performance

There are plenty of CPU options including the Core i5-10400H, i7-10750H, i7-10850H, i7-10875H, i9-10885H, Xeon W-10855M, and Xeon W-10885M. Users who want vPro support should avoid the i7-10750H while users who want ECC RAM support should consider only the Xeon options.

Graphics options include integrated UHD Graphics 630 only or the Quadro T2000 or Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q with Optimus. RAM can be configured up to 64 GB or just half if configured with ECC instead.

We ran all performance benchmarks below on Dell's Ultra Performance mode for the best possible scores.

Processor

The Xeon W-10885M in both our Precision 5750 and 7550 test units return similar results to the Core i9-10980HK in the MSI WS66. Certain laptops with the Core i9 are able to run faster such as Dell's own Alienware m17 R3, but the difference is only about 12 percent. We're able to observe a performance dip of about 9 percent over time when running CineBench R15 xT in a loop due to the limitations of the overlying cooling system.

See our dedicated page on the Xeon W-10885M for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. Upgrading from the quad-core Core i5-10400H base option to our octa-core Xeon W will net about 90 percent faster multi-thread performance.

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1646 (1622.65-1794.37)
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1668 (1647.11-1843.74)
Dell Precision 5550 P91F Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1295 (1188.78-1518.72)
MSI WS75 9TL-636 Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1115 (1053.3-1188)
Alienware m17 R3 P45E GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1826 (1770.85-1836.46)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
4816 Points +18%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4552 Points +12%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
4161 Points +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
4065 Points
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (2727 - 4065, n=4)
3639 Points -10%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
3429 Points -16%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
2974 Points -27%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
2822 Points -31%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
2724 Points -33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
2428 Points -40%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
2161 Points -47%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
2107 Points -48%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
505 Points +3%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
500 Points +2%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
495 Points +1%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (488 - 502, n=4)
495 Points +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
492 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
492 Points
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
484 Points -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
457 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
454 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
446 Points -9%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
443 Points -10%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
440 Points -11%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
1987 Points +19%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1932 (1913.23min - 1932.18max) Points +16%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1714 (1647.11min - 1843.74max) Points +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1666 (1622.65min - 1794.37max) Points
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1585 Points -5%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
1519 (1188.78min - 1518.72max) Points -9%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (1089 - 1666, n=4)
1509 Points -9%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
1276 (1144.66min - 1276.49max) Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1272 (1143min - 1229max) Points -24%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
1211 Points -27%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
1014 Points -39%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
889 (827.87min - 893.75max) Points -47%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
211 Points
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
210 Points 0%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (208 - 211, n=4)
210 Points 0%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
203 Points -4%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points -4%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
201 Points -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
192 Points -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
187 Points -11%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points -11%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
186 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
186 Points -12%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
182 Points -14%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
508 Seconds * -78%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
494.9 Seconds * -73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
411 Seconds * -44%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
401 Seconds * -40%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
388.5 Seconds * -36%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
351 Seconds * -23%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (281 - 412, n=3)
326 Seconds * -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
286 Seconds *
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
273 Seconds * +5%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
248 Seconds * +13%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
223.8 Seconds * +22%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (5495 - 5703, n=3)
5568 MIPS +1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5507 MIPS
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
5412 MIPS -2%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
5379 MIPS -2%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5335 MIPS -3%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
5311 MIPS -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5020 MIPS -9%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4889 MIPS -11%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
4871 MIPS -12%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
4804 MIPS -13%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4634 MIPS -16%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
4610 MIPS -16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
53166 MIPS +16%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50428 MIPS +10%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
48730 MIPS +7%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
45696 MIPS
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (36204 - 48044, n=3)
43315 MIPS -5%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
39599 MIPS -13%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
39571 MIPS -13%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
34101 MIPS -25%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
33794 MIPS -26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
31087 MIPS -32%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
28987 MIPS -37%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
24388 MIPS -47%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1347 Points
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1341 Points 0%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (1331 - 1347, n=3)
1339 Points -1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
1323 Points -2%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1314 Points -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
1200 Points -11%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
1184 Points -12%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
1183 Points -12%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1176 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1150 Points -15%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8491 Points
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
8393 Points -1%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
8347 Points -2%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (6948 - 8491, n=3)
7939 Points -7%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7864 Points -7%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
7703 Points -9%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
5911 Points -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5270 Points -38%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
5050 Points -41%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
4399 Points -48%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K
15.8 fps +16%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.6 fps
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.1 fps -4%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
13 fps -4%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (8.89 - 13.6, n=3)
11.9 fps -12%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
10.4 fps -24%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.38 fps -31%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H
9.2 fps -32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
9.1 fps -33%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
7.54 fps -45%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.28 fps -46%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
63.6 s * -43%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
60.7 s * -37%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
57.7 s * -30%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK
57.5 s * -30%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
55.7 s * -25%
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (44.4 - 58.1, n=3)
49.7 s * -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
44.4 s *
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
44 s * +1%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
43 s * +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.695 sec * -22%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.646 sec * -14%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.639 sec * -13%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.589 sec * -4%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.582 sec * -2%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.574 sec * -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.568 sec *
Average Intel Xeon W-10885M
  (0.551 - 0.57, n=3)
0.563 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1666 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
232 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
211 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10
Score
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5875 Points +7%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5815 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5768 Points +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
5484 Points
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5401 Points -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4918 Points -10%
Essentials
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
10351 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
9917 Points -4%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9694 Points -6%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9649 Points -7%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9251 Points -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9214 Points -11%
Productivity
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
8269 Points
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7979 Points -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7769 Points -6%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7693 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7641 Points -8%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7278 Points -12%
Digital Content Creation
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7198 Points +38%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7156 Points +37%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6876 Points +31%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6353 Points +21%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
5229 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4511 Points -14%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4732 Points +24%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4657 Points +22%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4322 Points +13%
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4301 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
4271 Points +12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
3819 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5570 Points +18%
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5450 Points +16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5432 Points +15%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5323 Points +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
5241 Points +11%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
4718 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3819 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4718 points
PCMark 10 Score
5484 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows no major DPC latency issues in contrast to what we observed on the Precision 7550. Interestingly, we recorded three dropped frames during our minute-long 4K60 video test.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell Precision 7550
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, W-10885M, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
10043 μs * -1582%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3413 μs * -472%
Eluktronics RP-17
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD
1120 μs * -88%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G
858 μs * -44%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
850 μs * -42%
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
716 μs * -20%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
597 μs *
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
305 μs * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our unit comes with a Toshiba Kioxia XG6 as opposed to the Micron 2200S on our XPS 17. Unlike the Razer Blade Studio series which uses Samsung SSDs almost exclusively, it's more difficult to know what will ship with your Dell Precision since Dell likes to source from a handful of manufacturers. Nonetheless, the Toshiba XG6 is still a high-end SSD with transfer rates comparable to the Samsung PM981.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more technical information and benchmarks.

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Dell Precision 7730
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
MSI WE75 9TK
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
AS SSD
44%
23%
15%
3%
7%
Seq Read
2025
2958
46%
870
-57%
2697
33%
2693
33%
1308
-35%
Seq Write
1438
2350
63%
2247
56%
1789
24%
1542
7%
1871
30%
4K Read
38.77
56.6
46%
53.4
38%
50.5
30%
62.6
61%
48.35
25%
4K Write
96.9
106.1
9%
123.2
27%
105.9
9%
149.5
54%
106.6
10%
4K-64 Read
1105
1836
66%
1673
51%
1139
3%
871
-21%
1510
37%
4K-64 Write
1435
1789
25%
1826
27%
1714
19%
1006
-30%
1715
20%
Access Time Read *
0.08
0.061
24%
0.05
37%
0.061
24%
0.058
27%
0.103
-29%
Access Time Write *
0.116
0.036
69%
0.033
72%
0.037
68%
0.067
42%
0.106
9%
Score Read
1347
2189
63%
1813
35%
1460
8%
1203
-11%
1689
25%
Score Write
1676
2130
27%
2173
30%
1999
19%
1309
-22%
2008
20%
Score Total
3686
5411
47%
4989
35%
4168
13%
3088
-16%
4594
25%
Copy ISO MB/s
2609
3154
21%
3259
25%
1716
-34%
2343
-10%
Copy Program MB/s
740
533
-28%
435.6
-41%
542
-27%
526
-29%
Copy Game MB/s
1624
1349
-17%
1273
-22%
1375
-15%
1506
-7%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
19%
-1%
-7%
16%
19%
Write 4K
103.5
147.6
43%
103.5
0%
103.2
0%
154.3
49%
135.4
31%
Read 4K
44.56
47.57
7%
41.88
-6%
41.39
-7%
66.4
49%
56.6
27%
Write Seq
1934
2222
15%
1931
0%
1880
-3%
1561
-19%
1972
2%
Read Seq
1937
2543
31%
1286
-34%
2350
21%
2460
27%
2101
8%
Write 4K Q32T1
372.9
459.2
23%
414.3
11%
282.3
-24%
438
17%
527
41%
Read 4K Q32T1
358.9
515
43%
470.2
31%
314.3
-12%
568
58%
578
61%
Write Seq Q32T1
2894
2167
-25%
2393
-17%
1881
-35%
1581
-45%
1985
-31%
Read Seq Q32T1
3082
3430
11%
3425
11%
3216
4%
2724
-12%
3358
9%
Write 4K Q8T8
1484
1000
Read 4K Q8T8
1536
928
Total Average (Program / Settings)
32% / 33%
11% / 15%
4% / 7%
10% / 8%
13% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3082 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2894 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 358.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 372.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1937 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1934 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 44.56 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 103.5 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU Performance

Raw graphics performance is most similar to the consumer mobile GeForce GTX 1660 Ti but with hardware-accelerated RT features. Interestingly, Specviewperf shows our Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q outperforming the standard mobile Quadro RTX 3000 in the Lenovo ThinkPad P73 more often than not. Opting for the lesser Quadro T2000 configuration will result in a 40 percent dip in graphics performance. We cannot confirm if the lesser T2000 option will the standard Quadro T2000 or the Quadro T2000 Max-Q.

See our dedicated page on the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Port Royal
Port Royal
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
24354 Points +70%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK
20164 Points +41%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points +35%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
17619 Points +23%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
15881 Points +11%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
14718 Points +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
14328 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
  (13196 - 14328, n=3)
13714 Points -4%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
8727 Points -39%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
8416 Points -41%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
8107 Points -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-8565U
3410 Points -76%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
3088 Points -78%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
9956 Points +84%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points +43%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK
7645 Points +41%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
6851 Points +27%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
6014 Points +11%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5534 Points +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
5405 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
  (4943 - 5405, n=3)
5132 Points -5%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
3261 Points -40%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
3122 Points -42%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
3066 Points -43%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-8565U
1043 Points -81%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
938 Points -83%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
9779 Points +70%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK
7920 Points +38%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points +37%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
6823 Points +19%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
6080 Points +6%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
5737 Points
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5697 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
  (5070 - 5737, n=3)
5388 Points -6%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
3474 Points -39%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
3356 Points -42%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
3348 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-8565U
1171 Points -80%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
1039 Points -82%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
32999 Points +69%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK
27290 Points +40%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points +35%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
23739 Points +22%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
20542 Points +5%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
19670 Points +1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
19513 Points
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
  (17074 - 19513, n=3)
18037 Points -8%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
12132 Points -38%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
11468 Points -41%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
11454 Points -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-8565U
4273 Points -78%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
4256 Points -78%
1280x720 Performance Combined
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, i9-10980HK
16451 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M
16401 Points
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK
16148 Points -2%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points -16%
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
  (10298 - 16401, n=3)
13645 Points -17%
MSI WS75 9TL-636
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
13084 Points -20%
MSI WE75 9TK
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
12899 Points -21%
Maingear Vector 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12192 Points -26%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i7-10875H
11416 Points -30%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9750H
11239 Points -31%
Dell Precision 5540
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q, i9-9980HK
10098 Points -38%
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U
5318 Points -68%
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE
NVIDIA Quadro P520, i7-8565U
3951 Points -76%
3DMark 11 Performance
18981 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34264 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13342 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5737 points
Help
SPECviewperf 13
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
265.9 fps +95%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
232.2 fps +70%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
178.3 fps +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
149.4 fps +10%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
136.2 fps
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
108 fps -21%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
101.9 fps -25%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
88.9 fps -35%
Catia (catia-05)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
338.9 fps +71%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
259.7 fps +31%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
198.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
185.8 fps -6%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
180.8 fps -9%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
177.3 fps -11%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
143.9 fps -28%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
138.3 fps -30%
Creo (creo-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
319.8 fps +77%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
286.1 fps +58%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
238.4 fps +32%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
180.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
160.6 fps -11%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
154.8 fps -14%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
116.8 fps -35%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
116.3 fps -36%
Energy (energy-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
57.3 fps +100%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
38.34 fps +34%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
31.93 fps +12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
28.6 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
25.76 fps -10%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
25.15 fps -12%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
17.8 fps -38%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
15.66 fps -45%
Maya (maya-05)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
402 fps +138%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
340.8 fps +102%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
231.3 fps +37%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
168.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
155.4 fps -8%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
148.2 fps -12%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
114.6 fps -32%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
110.2 fps -35%
Medical (medical-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
133.4 fps +81%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
102.5 fps +39%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
85 fps +15%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
73.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
53.9 fps -27%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
50.1 fps -32%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
48.02 fps -35%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
37.93 fps -49%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
182.6 fps +151%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
127.1 fps +75%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
98.7 fps +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
73.3 fps +1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
72.8 fps
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
58.6 fps -20%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
42.39 fps -42%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
40.2 fps -45%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
465.3 fps +130%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
306.1 fps +51%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
204.4 fps +1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
202.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
160.6 fps -21%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
148.4 fps -27%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
139.4 fps -31%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
23.03 fps -89%
Solidworks (sw-04)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
203.8 fps +65%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
158.9 fps +28%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
123.7 fps
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
116.3 fps -6%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
110.6 fps -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
109.6 fps -11%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
104.4 fps -16%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
103.9 fps -16%
SPECviewperf 12
1900x1060 Catia (catia-04)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
220 fps +96%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
154.9 fps +38%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
120.8 fps +8%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
112.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
108.8 fps -3%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
105.1 fps -6%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
93 fps -17%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
92 fps -18%
1900x1060 Creo (creo-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
172.1 fps +43%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
145.1 fps +21%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
120.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
113.6 fps -6%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
105.7 fps -12%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
89.6 fps -26%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
83.9 fps -30%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
72.2 fps -40%
1900x1060 Energy (energy-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
26 fps +131%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
16.72 fps +49%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
14.82 fps +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
11.54 fps +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
11.25 fps
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
10.25 fps -9%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
7.9 fps -30%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
6.31 fps -44%
1900x1060 Maya (maya-04)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
190.9 fps +195%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
179 fps +177%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
105.4 fps +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
72.4 fps +12%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
65.1 fps +1%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
64.9 fps 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
64.7 fps
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
50.4 fps -22%
1900x1060 Medical (medical-01)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
109.3 fps +134%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
65.8 fps +41%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
56.6 fps +21%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
46.63 fps
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
43.68 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
43.01 fps -8%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
34.8 fps -25%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
28.57 fps -39%
1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01)
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
182.3 fps +149%
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
126.4 fps +72%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
98.8 fps +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
76.9 fps +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
73.3 fps
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
58.7 fps -20%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
42.75 fps -42%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
40.3 fps -45%
1900x1060 Siemens NX (snx-02)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
258.1 fps +151%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
165 fps +60%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
108.4 fps +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
103 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
99.6 fps -3%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
82.7 fps -20%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
74.5 fps -28%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
12.72 fps -88%
1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03)
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
230.1 fps +106%
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US
Intel Core i9-10980HK, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
156.9 fps +40%
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
113.8 fps +2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
111.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
107.1 fps -4%
Dell Precision 7730
Intel Core i7-8850H, NVIDIA Quadro P3200
102 fps -9%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
94 fps -16%
Corsair One i160
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (Desktop)
83.7 fps -25%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02: Ø52.4 (48-58)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 304.7 189.4 107.4 57.2 36.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 145 133 126 120 77.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 149 79.1 59.5 43.8 25.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 117 106 85.8 67.6

Emissions

System Noise

Identical cooling solution and fan behavior as the XPS 17 9700. Fans are large at ~60 mm in diameter each
Identical cooling solution and fan behavior as the XPS 17 9700. Fans are large at ~60 mm in diameter each
Fans are very quiet during low to low-medium loads, but they pick up quickly to over 45 dB(A) when running higher loads like 3DMark 06
Fans are very quiet during low to low-medium loads, but they pick up quickly to over 45 dB(A) when running higher loads like 3DMark 06
Upgradeable RAM slots
Upgradeable RAM slots
One of the few mobile workstations with a vapor chamber cooler to maximize performance out of a super-thin design
One of the few mobile workstations with a vapor chamber cooler to maximize performance out of a super-thin design
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Prime95+FurMark stress)
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Orange: Witcher 3, Green: Prime95+FurMark stress)
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WS75 9TL-636
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Dell Precision 7730
Quadro P3200, i7-8850H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
MSI WE75 9TK
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Noise
11%
2%
6%
12%
1%
off / environment *
27.5
29.4
-7%
29.4
-7%
29.7
-8%
29.3
-7%
28.5
-4%
Idle Minimum *
27.5
29.4
-7%
29.4
-7%
29.7
-8%
29.3
-7%
29
-5%
Idle Average *
27.5
29.9
-9%
30.1
-9%
29.7
-8%
29.3
-7%
29
-5%
Idle Maximum *
27.5
29.9
-9%
30.9
-12%
29.7
-8%
29.3
-7%
31.5
-15%
Load Average *
44.8
31.6
29%
40.7
9%
31.4
30%
30.2
33%
32
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
52.5
31.6
40%
41.9
20%
37.9
28%
30.7
42%
44.7
15%
Load Maximum *
52.5
31.6
40%
42.7
19%
44.2
16%
33.1
37%
56.5
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
27.5 / 27.5 / 27.5 dB(A)
Load
44.8 / 52.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 27.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.943.138.33939.12534.636.433.632.436.13129.731.730.628.231.64031.731.431.228.229.65029.530.224.124.328.16337.534.625.324.232.9803230.128.428.231.610033.831.32626.132.812533.73123.124.134.21603531.819.620.934.420036.932.820.521.337.125038.433.118.619.838.43153932.418.619.53940039.332.417.41838.95003831.316.516.937.463038.932.615.515.339.180040.533.315.214.940.7100042.33514.914.442.7125041.935.314.614.442.1160041.234.314.414.541.1200040.132.614.414.539.9250041.433.714.514.341.3315041.333.915.515.641.3400042.533.51514.842.7500040.93015.51540.6630038.827.515.31538.5800033.622.414.815.233.91000031.920.814.715.132.21250030.119.414.815.430.11600025.917.615.316.926SPL52.544.827.427.552.5N8.95118.9median 38.9median 32.4median 15.3median 15.3median 38.9Delta3.53.32.22.53.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Precision 5000 5750 P92F

Temperature

Surface temperature development is symmetrical with hot spots near the keyboard center and rear. When under high loads, the keyboard center can reach over 46 C which is not all that different from what we observed on the thicker Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17. Nonetheless, the MSI WS66 10TMT is able to run slightly cooler and with much more powerful Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q.

Rear exhaust
Rear exhaust
AC adapter after running high loads for over an hour
AC adapter after running high loads for over an hour
Max. Load
 36.2 °C
97 F
55.6 °C
132 F
43 °C
109 F
 
 32 °C
90 F
50.8 °C
123 F
31.4 °C
89 F
 
 31.4 °C
89 F
33.6 °C
92 F
30 °C
86 F
 
Maximum: 55.6 °C = 132 F
Average: 38.2 °C = 101 F
38.6 °C
101 F
42 °C
108 F
34.4 °C
94 F
30.6 °C
87 F
34.8 °C
95 F
30 °C
86 F
29.6 °C
85 F
32 °C
90 F
30.2 °C
86 F
Maximum: 42 °C = 108 F
Average: 33.6 °C = 92 F
Power Supply (max.)  54.8 °C = 131 F | Room Temperature 23 °C = 73 F | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 38.1 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-5.8 °C / -10.5 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (top)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Witcher 3 stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (top)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)
Prime95+FurMark stress (bottom)

Stress Test

When running Prime95 to stress the CPU, clock rates would boost to 4.3 GHz for only the first few seconds until core temperature reaches 99 C. The processor would then fall to 3.5 GHz and 84 C temporarily before jumping back up and stabilizing at 3.7 to 3.8 GHz and 93 C. Top-end XPS configurations aren't afraid to run their processors at temperatures much warmer than the competition and the Precision 5750 is no different.

When running Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously, GPU clock rates would fluctuate wildly between 930 and 1770 MHz whereas other laptops are more constant. We suspect that this is because its performance is being limited by the 130 W AC adapter as detailed in our Power Consumption section below.

Running on battery power will limit performance. A Fire Strike test on batteries would return Physics and Graphics scores of 15189 and 4404 points, respectively, compared to 20247 and 14328 points when on mains.

System idle
System idle
Witcher 3 stress
Witcher 3 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C) Average GPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 45 44
Prime95 Stress 3.7 - 3.8 -- 93 61
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 2.3 - 2.6 930 - 1770 78 - 81 70
Witcher 3 Stress ~4.2 1545 ~82 72

Speakers

Identical speakers to the XPS 17 with two standard and two tweeters (2.5 W x2 + 1.5 W x2)
Identical speakers to the XPS 17 with two standard and two tweeters (2.5 W x2 + 1.5 W x2)
Pink noise at maximum volume
Pink noise at maximum volume
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.638.337.62535.133.635.13128.530.628.54028.131.228.1502524.1256329.725.329.78038.328.438.310052.32652.312559.923.159.91606119.66120062.320.562.325065.918.665.931565.518.665.540066.317.466.350066.616.566.663063.515.563.580065.115.265.1100064.814.964.8125071.914.671.9160071.714.471.7200074.214.474.2250068.614.568.6315069.515.569.5400069.61569.6500073.215.573.2630079.615.379.6800077.414.877.41000079.514.779.51250074.114.874.11600071.615.371.6SPL85.627.485.6N65.1165.1median 68.6median 15.3median 68.6Delta4.22.24.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Precision 5000 5750 P92FApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Idling on desktop consumes about 6 W minimum or up to 17 W when on the High Performance profile with the Quadro GPU active. When running high loads like games, consumption averages about 115 W or 25 percent less than the ThinkPad P53 equipped with the full-power Quadro RTX 3000. 

Maximum consumption when running extreme loads is lower than expected due to the relatively small (~14.3 x 6.5 x 2.3 cm) 130 W AC adapter. In comparison, the Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 comes with the same GPU and yet it is able to draw over 180 W because of its larger AC adapter. Thus, the Precision 5750 isn't well suited for running extreme processing loads for extended periods as exemplified by the fluctuating GPU clock rates in our Stress Test section above. The battery will also charge very slowly when under such loads due to the low 130 W ceiling. We experienced no major battery discharging issues when connected to an AC outlet unlike on some early XPS 17 units.

Constant consumption when running 3DMark 06
Constant consumption when running 3DMark 06
Constant consumption when running Witcher 3
Constant consumption when running Witcher 3
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike and stabilize at 130.8 W save for the initial dip near the beginning of the test
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike and stabilize at 130.8 W save for the initial dip near the beginning of the test
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike and fluctuate between 110 W and 130 W. The adapter limits the system to 130 W maximum
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Consumption would spike and fluctuate between 110 W and 130 W. The adapter limits the system to 130 W maximum
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.31 / 5.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6.3 / 14.2 / 17.3 Watt
Load midlight 121.2 / 130.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2400, 17.00
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.00
MSI WS75 9TL-636
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Dell Precision 7730
i7-8850H, Quadro P3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI WE75 9TK
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Power Consumption
-17%
-47%
-25%
-13%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
6.3
11.3
-79%
16.4
-160%
10.1
-60%
8.9
-41%
12.1
-92%
Idle Average *
14.2
16
-13%
21.6
-52%
18
-27%
12.8
10%
18.4
-30%
Idle Maximum *
17.3
16.8
3%
22.9
-32%
19.7
-14%
16.4
5%
18.8
-9%
Load Average *
121.2
93.6
23%
88
27%
89.6
26%
108.4
11%
95.1
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
115.4
106
8%
137
-19%
134
-16%
153
-33%
135.5
-17%
Load Maximum *
130.7
186.6
-43%
193
-48%
204
-56%
166
-27%
203.7
-56%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Runtimes are long owing to the large battery capacity and support for Optimus. We're able to record just shy of 11 hours of real-world WLAN use when browsing the web at 150 nits brightness on the Balanced power profile.

Recharging from empty to full capacity takes about 2 hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
18h 9min
WiFi Websurfing
10h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 9min
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 97 Wh
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 57 Wh
MSI WS75 9TL-636
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), 82 Wh
Dell Precision 7730
i7-8850H, Quadro P3200, 92 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), 99 Wh
MSI WE75 9TK
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-35%
-38%
-40%
-16%
-49%
Reader / Idle
1089
754
-31%
659
-39%
WiFi v1.3
652
352
-46%
395
-39%
335
-49%
664
2%
293
-55%
Load
129
99
-23%
72
-44%
90
-30%
85
-34%
61
-53%

Pros

+ high quality 4K UHD touchscreen
+ sleek and compact 16:10 design
+ full-size SD card reader
+ 4x Thunderbolt 3 ports
+ Xeon and vPro options
+ compact AC adapter
+ long battery life

Cons

- one-year limited warranty standard instead of three years
- no integrated USB-A, HDMI, RJ-45, Smart Card, or SIM
- slow recharge rate when running high loads
- high running temperatures
- no integrated NumPad
- no webcam shutter
- spongy clickpad

Verdict

In review: Dell Precision 5750 P92F. Test unit provided by Dell
In review: Dell Precision 5750 P92F. Test unit provided by Dell

The Precision 5750 is for users who don't need any of the auxiliary features of the larger Precision 7750 and would rather omit them completely in favor of a thinner, sleeker, and more portable design. If you travel a lot and don't mind a barebones system that's part Ultrabook and part workstation, then this Precision fulfills that role. It's recommended to have Thunderbolt 3 monitors and docking stations to make the most of the system.

Aside from the hardware sacrifices, there are a few other drawbacks to keep in mind. Firstly, it's unfortunate that the base warranty is only 12 months compared to 36 months on the larger Precision 7750 almost as if Dell is viewing the Precision 5550 as the inferior model. Secondly, CPU temperatures will be quite high and with a slower battery recharge rate when running demanding loads. The latter is due to the small 130 W AC adapter which favors portability over higher output. It's apparent that Dell has designed the system to excel at "bursty" workloads whereas the larger and more powerful Precision 7550/7570 will do better at sustained workloads. And lastly, the lack of any sort of webcam shutter is strange to see on a chassis design this new.

The Precision 5750 is purposefully light on hardware features in favor of a more portable design. If you want a more travel-friendly 17-inch workstation, then the Precision 5750 will do the trick.

Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F - 09/07/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
66 / 80 → 82%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Battery
89 / 95 → 93%
Display
85%
Games Performance
91%
Application Performance
91%
Temperature
87 / 95 → 91%
Noise
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
86%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
81%
87%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Dell Precision 5750 Workstation Review: The XPS 17 For Professionals
Allen Ngo, 2020-09- 8 (Update: 2020-09- 8)