Notebookcheck

Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 Convertible Review: A Latitude 7400 At Heart

New name, same chassis. Last year's Latitude 7400 2-in-1 was already excellent, so why mess with a good thing? The Latitude 9410 2-in-1 doesn't bring anything new from a visual standpoint, but some users might appreciate the newer Comet Lake-U CPU options and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity.

Earlier this year, Dell introduced its Latitude 9000 series of ultra-thin high-end business laptops that were advertised to be even sleeker and better than the Latitude 7000 series. In reality, however, Dell sort of just renamed the existing Latitude 7400 2-in-1 into the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 and then called it a day because both of these systems share nearly same chassis design and internals. The older Whiskey Lake-U CPUs have been upgraded to Comet Lake-U, but not much else has changed. Thus, the 2020 Latitude 9410 2-in-1 can be viewed as a minor update to the 2019 Latitude 7400 2-in-1.

We recommend checking out our review on the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 for more information on the chassis and its physical features since many of our comments apply here on the Latitude 9410 2-in-1. Direct competitors include other flagship 14-inch subnotebook convertibles like the Lenovo Yoga C940, Asus ZenBook Flip 14 or HP EliteBook x360 1040.

More Dell reviews:

Dell Latitude 9410 2-in-1 specifications sheet (Source: Dell)
Dell Latitude 9410 2-in-1 specifications sheet (Source: Dell)
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G (Latitude 14 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10610U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Graphics adapter
Intel UHD Graphics 620, Core: 300 MHz, Memory: 1064 MHz, LPDDR3, 26.20.100.8141
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR3-2133, Dual-Channel, 10-10-10-28
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, Sharp LQ140M1, IPS, SHP14D2, Dell P/N: FDGXV, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-LP - cAVS
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.89 x 319.77 x 199.9 ( = 0.59 x 12.59 x 7.87 in)
Battery
78 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 6-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Dell Optimizer, Command Update, Power Manager, Digital Delivery, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.505 kg ( = 53.09 oz / 3.32 pounds), Power Supply: 353 g ( = 12.45 oz / 0.78 pounds)
Price
2300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89 %
08/2020
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620
1.5 kg14.89 mm14.00"1920x1080
88 %
10/2019
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
1.4 kg14.95 mm14.00"1920x1080
81 %
04/2020
LG Gram 14T90N
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620
1.2 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080
91 %
02/2019
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620
1.4 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080
88 %
06/2019
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620
1.5 kg15 mm14.00"1920x1080
85 %
05/2020
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620
1.4 kg18 mm14.00"1920x1080

Case

Much like what we observed on the Latitude 7400 2-in-1, the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 remains one of the strongest ultra-thin business laptops in Dell's Latitude lineup in terms of rigidity and design. We can notice no creaking when twisting the metal base or lid and only minimal warping. It may not be a brand new look, but it continues to be marginally smaller than many alternatives including the HP EliteBook x360 1040, Lenovo Yoga C940, or Asus ZenBook Flip 14 while weighing almost the same.

Chassis passes 13 different MIL-STD 810G standards
Chassis passes 13 different MIL-STD 810G standards
The design is visually identical to the older Latitude 7400 2-in-1
The design is visually identical to the older Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Bottom bezel is relatively narrow to make tablet mode more ergonomic
Bottom bezel is relatively narrow to make tablet mode more ergonomic
Matte gray surface is smooth and hides fingerprints well
Matte gray surface is smooth and hides fingerprints well
Hinges feel firm and uniform at all angles with no teetering when typing
Hinges feel firm and uniform at all angles with no teetering when typing
Touch-fingerprint reader power button is optional
Touch-fingerprint reader power button is optional
325 mm / 12.8 inch 211 mm / 8.31 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.2 kg2.54 lbs321.4 mm / 12.7 inch 215 mm / 8.46 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 1.4 kg2.98 lbs320 mm / 12.6 inch 206 mm / 8.11 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 1.4 kg3.09 lbs320.3 mm / 12.6 inch 215.6 mm / 8.49 inch 14.95 mm / 0.589 inch 1.4 kg3.09 lbs320 mm / 12.6 inch 202 mm / 7.95 inch 15 mm / 0.591 inch 1.5 kg3.33 lbs319.77 mm / 12.6 inch 199.9 mm / 7.87 inch 14.89 mm / 0.586 inch 1.5 kg3.32 lbs

Connectivity

Port options and positioning are identical to the Latitude 7400 2-in-1. We appreciate the variety especially when compared to some consumer-oriented laptops like the HP Spectre x360 13 or Dell XPS 13. However, the ports along the left edge are tightly spaced and thus not as accommodating for thicker cables.

When compared to the HP EliteBook x360 1040 G5, the Dell integrates a MicroSD card reader whereas the HP has a volume rocker.

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, MicroSD reader, Micro-SIM slot (optional WWAN), USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Noble Lock
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, MicroSD reader, Micro-SIM slot (optional WWAN), USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1, Noble Lock
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: 2x USB-C + Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1
Left: 2x USB-C + Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.0, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 1

SD Card Reader

Transfer rates from the integrated MicroSD reader are fast and comparable to the XPS series. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card to desktop is over 6x faster than on the Asus ZenBook Flip 14.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
173.6 MB/s ∼100%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
172.1 MB/s ∼99% -1%
LG Gram 14T90N
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
73.14 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
26.7 MB/s ∼15% -85%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
209.62 MB/s ∼100% +12%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
186.4 MB/s ∼89%
LG Gram 14T90N
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)
81.63 MB/s ∼39% -56%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)
27.5 MB/s ∼13% -85%

Communication

Wireless has been upgraded from the Intel 9560 on last year's Latitude 7400 to the Intel AX201 on our Latitude 9410 for Wi-Fi 6 compatibility. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.

Removable WLAN module. The empty WAN slot can also be seen here, but the antenna are not included on non-WAN configurations
Removable WLAN module. The empty WAN slot can also be seen here, but the antenna are not included on non-WAN configurations
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1470 (835min - 1680max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1291 (1160min - 1449max) MBit/s ∼88%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
850 (729min - 1030max) MBit/s ∼58% -34%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
654 MBit/s ∼44% -49%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
588 (456min - 634max) MBit/s ∼40% -54%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Spin 5 SP513-54N-79EY
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1384 (1306min - 1419max) MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
956 (835min - 1018max) MBit/s ∼69%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2020-20UCS03S00
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
898 (806min - 938max) MBit/s ∼65% -6%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
477 MBit/s ∼34% -50%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
430 (364min - 477max) MBit/s ∼31% -55%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1290 (1160-1449)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø956 (835-1018)

Webcam

ColorChecker
6.6 ∆E
7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
13 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G: 7.61 ∆E min: 2.23 - max: 12.96 ∆E

Security

Aside from vPro, IR, Noble Lock, and a fingerprint reader, the system carries a proximity sensor that's unique to certain Dell laptops. It's able to automatically detect when a user is nearby and then initiate the IR camera for hands-free ExpressSign-in. There is no webcam shutter option, however.

Maintenance

The bottom panel is relatively easy to remove after loosening 10 Philips screws. The M.2 storage bay and wireless module are removable while RAM is fixed. The WAN slot is also present but rendered useless on our non-WAN configuration. 

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the box other than the paperwork and AC adapter. Optional accessories include the Premium Active Pen (PN579X) and Latitude carrying sleeve.

A three-year limited warranty comes standard with plenty of extension options.

Input Devices

Keyboard

Key layout and feedback remain identical to the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 which isn't a bad thing since we found the typing experience on the older Latitude to be one of the best for a subnotebook convertible. Feedback is crisper and with deeper travel than on most other Ultrabooks including Dell's own XPS 13 series. Key clatter is slightly louder, however, which is a fair trade-off for more comfortable keys.

The F9 key continues to have no secondary function. An electronic webcam shutter like on the latest HP Envy series would have been great to see here.

Touchpad

The Precision glass clickpad (~10.5 x 6 cm) is smooth and with almost no sticking even when gliding at slow speeds. Its integrated mouse buttons are moderate in feedback and clatter and they feel easier to use than the softer clickpads on the XPS series. We wish the clickpad could have been a little bigger, but it's not a major issue since the small surface area pairs well with the small screen.

Keyboard layout remains identical to the Latitude 7400 2-in-1. All keys and symbols are backlit
Keyboard layout remains identical to the Latitude 7400 2-in-1. All keys and symbols are backlit
The clickpad may be small but, it's comfortable to use
The clickpad may be small but, it's comfortable to use
Key feedback is firmer, louder, deeper, and more satisfying to type on than on the XPS 13
Key feedback is firmer, louder, deeper, and more satisfying to type on than on the XPS 13
The arrow keys and PgUp/PgDn keys are small and cramped to use
The arrow keys and PgUp/PgDn keys are small and cramped to use

Display

The Latitude 9410 2-in-1 uses the same Sharp SHP14D2 controller and Sharp LQ140M1 IPS touchscreen as on last year's Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Thus, it's not surprising to find that innate attributes like response times, contrast ratios, color coverage, brightness, and even pulse-width modulation frequencies are almost identical between the two models. Though the display is still excellent, it's somewhat disappointing to not see any year-over-year improvements such as higher resolution options or a brighter backlight like what HP offers on some competing EliteBooks.

Color reproduction covers all of sRGB and approximately 64 percent of AdobeRGB not unlike most high-end Ultrabooks.

Edge-to-edge Gorilla Glass is advertised as anti-reflective, but it's really not
Edge-to-edge Gorilla Glass is advertised as anti-reflective, but it's really not
Very narrow side bezels especially for a business-centric Ultrabook
Very narrow side bezels especially for a business-centric Ultrabook
Crisp subpixels due to the glossy overlay
Crisp subpixels due to the glossy overlay
Only minor uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners
Only minor uneven backlight bleeding along the edges and corners
279
cd/m²
282.2
cd/m²
280.5
cd/m²
301.7
cd/m²
293.4
cd/m²
291.3
cd/m²
302.6
cd/m²
295.1
cd/m²
287.4
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp LQ140M1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 302.6 cd/m² Average: 290.4 cd/m² Minimum: 21.66 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 293.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1544:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.29 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Sharp LQ140M1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 14.00, 1920x1080
LG Gram 14T90N
LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
AU Optronics AUO533D, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
SHP14A2, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
AU AUO323D, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Response Times
17%
10%
-23%
1%
32%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58.4 (26, 32.4)
49.6 (23.6, 26)
15%
54 (28.8, 25.2)
8%
70.8 (34.8, 36)
-21%
56 (31.6, 24.4)
4%
36 (18, 18)
38%
Response Time Black / White *
37.2 (18.4, 18.8)
30 (16.4, 13.6)
19%
32.8 (19.6, 13.2)
12%
34.4 (18.8, 15.6)
8%
38 (22.8, 15.2)
-2%
28 (16, 12)
25%
PWM Frequency
1667 (44)
735.3 (100)
-56%
1667 (24)
0%
Screen
-27%
-45%
-32%
-26%
-69%
Brightness middle
293.4
384
31%
322.2
10%
416.3
42%
277.2
-6%
280
-5%
Brightness
290
363
25%
301
4%
400
38%
263
-9%
286
-1%
Brightness Distribution
92
90
-2%
86
-7%
89
-3%
83
-10%
78
-15%
Black Level *
0.19
0.17
11%
0.25
-32%
0.29
-53%
0.2
-5%
0.208
-9%
Contrast
1544
2259
46%
1289
-17%
1436
-7%
1386
-10%
1346
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.29
3.5
-171%
3.62
-181%
2.69
-109%
2.1
-63%
3.97
-208%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.61
5.5
-52%
6.9
-91%
4.95
-37%
5.91
-64%
8.29
-130%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.88
1
-14%
1.22
-39%
2.13
-142%
1.03
-17%
3.42
-289%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
4.6
-171%
3.9
-129%
2.9
-71%
3.4
-100%
2.83
-66%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.32 95%
2.43 91%
2.4 92%
2.241 98%
2.34 94%
CCT
6394 102%
6884 94%
6344 102%
6623 98%
6030 108%
6556 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.8
62
-3%
61.3
-4%
60.1
-6%
64
0%
56
-12%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.1
97.7
-1%
95.6
-4%
94.5
-5%
100
1%
85
-14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-5% / -21%
-18% / -36%
-28% / -30%
-13% / -20%
-19% / -54%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

X-Rite colorimeter measurements reveal a well-calibrated display out of the box with average grayscale and color deltaE values of only 1.7 and 1.29, respectively. Calibrating the panel even further ourselves would result in even lower deltaE values to be one of the most color accurate sRGB displays we've seen on any subnotebook.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.4 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26 ms rise
↘ 32.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1667 Hz ≤ 44 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1667 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 44 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1667 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9661 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility hasn't changed from the Latitude 7400 2-in-1 since they use the same Sharp IPS panel with almost equal brightness. Dell's own XPS 13 convertible comes equipped with a noticeably brighter display than what is offered here on the Latitude (550 nits vs. 300 nits).

Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade only slightly from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade only slightly from extreme angles

Performance

Most people might assume that the Core i7-10610U will perform faster than the Core i7-10510U based on their product names alone. However, the Core i7-10610U and Core i7-10510U are differentiated by vPro support and not raw performance much like the last generation Core i7-8665U and Core i7-8565U. Dell offers no other options outside of Core i5 and Core i7 Comet Lake-U processors.

All benchmarks below were performed on Dell's Ultra Performance power profile for the highest scores possible.

 

Processor

Raw CPU performance is not all that different from the lesser Core i5-10210U, i5-10310U, or even the last generation Core i7-8565U. Users will have to configure with the higher-end hexa-core Core i7-10810U option for any appreciable gains in this regard.

Running CineBench R15 xT in a loop returns fluctuating scores as shown by our graph below due to the cycling core clock rates and temperatures when the system is subjected to extreme stress. In comparison, most other laptops have a high initial burst in speed before falling and stabilizing at fixed clock rates and temperatures. This behavior is explained in more detail in our Stress Test section below.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-10610U for more technical information and benchmarks.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750Tooltip
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø560 (497.7-629.8)
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø525 (511.81-563.88)
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø550 (527.93-598.95)
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø627 (606.12-749.06)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
2829 Points ∼100% +96%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
2410 Points ∼85% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
2173 Points ∼77% +50%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1590 Points ∼56% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
1518 Points ∼54% +5%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
1444 Points ∼51%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (1271 - 1624, n=4)
1406 Points ∼50% -3%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
1370 Points ∼48% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
1323 Points ∼47% -8%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
1097 Points ∼39% -24%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
461 Points ∼100% +6%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
460 Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
453 Points ∼98% +4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
452 Points ∼98% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
447 Points ∼97% +3%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
436 Points ∼95%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
433 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (349 - 469, n=4)
424 Points ∼92% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
414 Points ∼90% -5%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
380 Points ∼82% -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
1051 Points ∼100% +67%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1049 (803.97min - 1049.04max) Points ∼100% +67%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
873 (836.07min - 873.42max) Points ∼83% +39%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
749 Points ∼71% +19%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
740 (693min - 740max) Points ∼70% +17%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
720 (659min - 720max) Points ∼69% +14%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
726 Points ∼69% +15%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Intel Core i5-10210U
715 Points ∼68% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
680 (592.15min - 661.89max) Points ∼65% +8%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
630 (497.7min - 629.8max) Points ∼60%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
619 (557.76min - 618.79max) Points ∼59% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (548 - 675, n=4)
601 Points ∼57% -5%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8665U
599 Points ∼57% -5%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel Core i7-8650U
564 Points ∼54% -10%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
530 (445.08min - 507.45max) Points ∼50% -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
185 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
182 Points ∼98% +4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL 81Q9
Intel Core i7-1065G7
181 Points ∼98% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (175 - 191, n=4)
181 Points ∼98% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
180 Points ∼97% +3%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
180 Points ∼97% +3%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
179 Points ∼97% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
177 Points ∼96% +1%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8665U
176 Points ∼95% +1%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
175 Points ∼95%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel Core i7-8650U
172 Points ∼93% -2%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Intel Core i5-10210U
163 Points ∼88% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
163 Points ∼88% -7%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
162 Points ∼88% -7%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
990 Seconds * ∼100% -26%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
820.2 Seconds * ∼83% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
797 Seconds * ∼81% -2%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
784 Seconds * ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (674 - 816, n=4)
772 Seconds * ∼78% +2%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
765 Seconds * ∼77% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
707 Seconds * ∼71% +10%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
585 Seconds * ∼59% +25%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
584 Seconds * ∼59% +26%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
447 Seconds * ∼45% +43%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
4794 MIPS ∼100% +31%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
4740 MIPS ∼99% +30%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
4530 MIPS ∼94% +24%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (3653 - 4783, n=4)
4442 MIPS ∼93% +22%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
4431 MIPS ∼92% +21%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
4425 MIPS ∼92% +21%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
4422 MIPS ∼92% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4282 MIPS ∼89% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
4211 MIPS ∼88% +15%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
3653 MIPS ∼76%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
31114 MIPS ∼100% +102%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
27115 MIPS ∼87% +76%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
24058 MIPS ∼77% +57%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
19178 MIPS ∼62% +25%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8665U
18298 MIPS ∼59% +19%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
18289 MIPS ∼59% +19%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
18159 MIPS ∼58% +18%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
17548 MIPS ∼56% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (15369 - 20096, n=4)
17475 MIPS ∼56% +14%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
15369 MIPS ∼49%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
15128 MIPS ∼49% -2%
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
1253 Points ∼100% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (1201 - 1261, n=4)
1237 Points ∼99% +3%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
1225 Points ∼98% +2%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
1201 Points ∼96%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
1157 Points ∼92% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
1108 Points ∼88% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
1072 Points ∼86% -11%
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
5443 Points ∼100% +35%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
4618 Points ∼85% +15%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
4242 Points ∼78% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (3731 - 4622, n=4)
4049 Points ∼74% +1%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
4023 Points ∼74%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
3899 Points ∼72% -3%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
3628 Points ∼67% -10%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
8.81 fps ∼100% +94%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
6.98 fps ∼79% +54%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel Core i7-10710U
6.032 fps ∼68% +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
Intel Core i7-8565U
5.1 fps ∼58% +12%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Core i7-1065G7
5.1 fps ∼58% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (4.54 - 5.66, n=4)
4.83 fps ∼55% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
4.61 fps ∼52% +2%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
4.56 fps ∼52% 0%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
4.54 fps ∼52%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8665U
4.155 fps ∼47% -8%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
3.8 fps ∼43% -16%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
70.7 s * ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
64.3 s * ∼91% +9%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
61 s * ∼86% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (56.1 - 70.7, n=4)
61 s * ∼86% +14%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
57 s * ∼81% +19%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
54.16 s * ∼77% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
53.2 s * ∼75% +25%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel Core i7-10610U
0.855 sec * ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel Core i5-10210U
0.729 sec * ∼85% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-10610U
  (0.643 - 0.855, n=4)
0.704 sec * ∼82% +18%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.689 sec * ∼81% +19%
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
Intel Core i7-10510U
0.651 sec * ∼76% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
0.638 sec * ∼75% +25%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
0.611 sec * ∼71% +29%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
630 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
55.1 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
175 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark results are in the same ballpark as other 14-inch subnotebooks equipped with UHD Graphics and Core U-series CPUs. Scores are consistently higher than the older Latitude 7400 2-in-1 albeit just marginally. We didn't experience any software or hardware issues during our time with the test unit.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3900 Points ∼25% +17%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
3344 Points ∼22%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
3257 Points ∼21% -3%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3069 Points ∼20% -8%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
2916 Points ∼19% -13%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2859 Points ∼18% -15%
Productivity
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
7395 Points ∼66%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
7280 Points ∼65% -2%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
7077 Points ∼63% -4%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6924 Points ∼62% -6%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6670 Points ∼60% -10%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
6634 Points ∼59% -10%
Essentials
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9678 Points ∼84% +3%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
9412 Points ∼82%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9253 Points ∼81% -2%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8992 Points ∼78% -4%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
8980 Points ∼78% -5%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
8011 Points ∼70% -15%
Score
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4583 Points ∼52% +4%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
4410 Points ∼50%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
4167 Points ∼47% -6%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4078 Points ∼46% -8%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4060 Points ∼46% -8%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
3995 Points ∼46% -9%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5158 Points ∼76% +2%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5153 Points ∼76% +2%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
5071 Points ∼74%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
4743 Points ∼69% -6%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4558 Points ∼67% -10%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4003 Points ∼65% +7%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
3725 Points ∼60%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
3646 Points ∼59% -2%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3550 Points ∼57% -5%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
3308 Points ∼53% -11%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3725 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5071 points
PCMark 10 Score
4410 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple tabs on our homepage. 4K60 video playback is not perfect either with 49 dropped frames during our minute-long YouTube test.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
2865.4 μs * ∼100% -171%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ
2080.2 μs * ∼73% -97%
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1208.3 μs * ∼42% -14%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
1055.9 μs * ∼37%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
Vega 6 R4000, R5 4500U, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZNT512G
590.1 μs * ∼21% +44%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
588.6 μs * ∼21% +44%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
466 μs * ∼16% +56%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our test unit comes configured with a Micron 2200S NVMe SSD in contrast to the Toshiba XG6 drive on our older Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Sequential read rates are fast at just over 3000 MB/s, but it can take many read iterations to reach such speeds as exemplified by our DiskSpd loop test below. Write rates are much slower at about 1500 MB/s compared to almost twice that on the Samsung PM981 series.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
Single M.2 2280 slot
Single M.2 2280 slot
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Micron 2200S 512GB
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
LG Gram 14T90N
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
AS SSD
48%
60%
38%
-24%
-16%
Copy Game MB/s
1271.22
1278.47
1%
1424.73
12%
1024.32
-19%
1055.12
-17%
Copy Program MB/s
660.54
541.73
-18%
569.17
-14%
450.29
-32%
379.42
-43%
Copy ISO MB/s
1290.47
2015.93
56%
1891.18
47%
2034.38
58%
1767.39
37%
Score Total
2450
3670
50%
4560
86%
3790
55%
1300
-47%
1786
-27%
Score Write
966
1721
78%
1899
97%
1440
49%
345
-64%
601
-38%
Score Read
981
1322
35%
1749
78%
1569
60%
667
-32%
804
-18%
Access Time Write *
0.366
0.029
92%
0.091
75%
0.035
90%
0.143
61%
0.072
80%
Access Time Read *
0.055
0.052
5%
0.046
16%
0.043
22%
0.122
-122%
0.074
-35%
4K-64 Write
792.29
1461.29
84%
1573.42
99%
1208.83
53%
199.5
-75%
482.91
-39%
4K-64 Read
827.24
1010.39
22%
1511.94
83%
1341.64
62%
415.58
-50%
643.83
-22%
4K Write
76.39
134.11
76%
120.48
58%
104.06
36%
28.92
-62%
52.67
-31%
4K Read
41.93
59.06
41%
54.21
29%
46.25
10%
22.29
-47%
26.65
-36%
Seq Write
969.08
1253
29%
2048.14
111%
1269.89
31%
1162.98
20%
652.81
-33%
Seq Read
1117.25
2524.94
126%
1828.87
64%
1815.96
63%
2288.68
105%
1336.41
20%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
30%
41%
20%
-29%
-32%
Write 4K
81.18
128.4
58%
181.4
123%
122.7
51%
35.06
-57%
54.61
-33%
Read 4K
45.41
46.37
2%
52.5
16%
46.57
3%
23.64
-48%
28.19
-38%
Write Seq
1190
1863
57%
1592
34%
1725
45%
1537
29%
839.9
-29%
Read Seq
1766
2340
33%
1617
-8%
2392
35%
1782
1%
905
-49%
Write 4K Q32T1
436
451.1
3%
555.8
27%
470.6
8%
100.3
-77%
409.5
-6%
Read 4K Q32T1
374.4
415.3
11%
539.1
44%
313.2
-16%
62.73
-83%
292.4
-22%
Write Seq Q32T1
1582
2985
89%
2955
87%
1869
18%
2698
71%
1038
-34%
Read Seq Q32T1
3017
2565
-15%
3270
8%
3380
12%
1073
-64%
1607
-47%
Write 4K Q8T8
451.4
Read 4K Q8T8
1004.4
Total Average (Program / Settings)
39% / 42%
51% / 53%
29% / 32%
-27% / -26%
-24% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Micron 2200S 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3017 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1582 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 374.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 436 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1766 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1190 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 81.18 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000Tooltip
: Ø2361 (1232.55-3036.48)

GPU Performance

The UHD Graphics 620 hasn't changed in years which is fine if you mainly plan on video streaming, web browsing, or emailing. Nonetheless, it's too bad that Dell isn't offering any Ice Lake, Ryzen, or GeForce MX options which would have boosted graphics performance significantly for those who want it.

See our dedicated page on the UHD Graphics 620 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
1134 Points ∼100% +168%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
903 Points ∼80% +113%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
835 Points ∼74% +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
821 Points ∼72% +94%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
425 Points ∼37% 0%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U
423 Points ∼37%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
402 Points ∼35% -5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (299 - 443, n=77)
378 Points ∼33% -11%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
375 Points ∼33% -11%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
1249 Points ∼100% +157%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
1028 Points ∼82% +112%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
945 Points ∼76% +94%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
931 Points ∼75% +92%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
491 Points ∼39% +1%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U
486 Points ∼39%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
461 Points ∼37% -5%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (343 - 512, n=79)
434 Points ∼35% -11%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
429 Points ∼34% -12%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
3863 Points ∼100% +189%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
3156 Points ∼82% +136%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3036 Points ∼79% +127%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
2802 Points ∼73% +110%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
1339 Points ∼35% 0%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U
1335 Points ∼35%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
1285 Points ∼33% -4%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U
1245 Points ∼32% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
1227 Points ∼32% -8%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
1155 Points ∼30% -13%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (557 - 1420, n=199)
1152 Points ∼30% -14%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
23354 Points ∼100% +117%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
21630 Points ∼93% +101%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
21604 Points ∼93% +100%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U
10804 Points ∼46% 0%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U
10785 Points ∼46%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U
10165 Points ∼44% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
10004 Points ∼43% -7%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
9882 Points ∼42% -8%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (6910 - 11436, n=212)
9229 Points ∼40% -14%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
7067 Points ∼30% -34%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
4613 Points ∼100% +147%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4045 Points ∼88% +117%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
3727 Points ∼81% +100%
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
3601 Points ∼78% +93%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
2078 Points ∼45% +11%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U
1869 Points ∼41% 0%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U
1868 Points ∼40%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
1820 Points ∼39% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
1729 Points ∼37% -7%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
1579 Points ∼34% -15%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (959 - 2142, n=231)
1572 Points ∼34% -16%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U
1550 Points ∼34% -17%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, R7 4700U
4927 Points ∼100% +151%
Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N3S02L00
NVIDIA GeForce MX250, i7-8565U
4748 Points ∼96% +142%
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7
4613 Points ∼94% +135%
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000), R5 4500U
4392 Points ∼89% +124%
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U
1965 Points ∼40%
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U
1940 Points ∼39% -1%
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U
1902 Points ∼39% -3%
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
1855 Points ∼38% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20T00044GE
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U
1844 Points ∼37% -6%
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U
1778 Points ∼36% -10%
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620
  (1235 - 2006, n=231)
1744 Points ∼35% -11%
LG Gram 14T90N
Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U
1738 Points ∼35% -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
2206 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
9933 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1218 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
486 points
Help
low med. high ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 59.1 48.4 20.5 18.7 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 12 10.9 10.5 fps

Emissions

System Noise

Whereas the fan in our Latitude 7400 2-in-1 test unit was unusually lethargic, the fan in our Latitude 9410 2-in-1 behaves more normally. The fan is barely audible at just 31.7 dB(A) at worst when browsing or video streaming and with no annoying pulsing behavior. Running higher loads like 3DMark 06 will bump fan noise to almost 40 dB(A) near the end of the 90-second benchmark to be louder than competitors, but it quickly becomes almost silent again once the heavy processing load stops.

Interestingly, fan noise when under heavy loads like CineBench or Prime95 is constant despite the cycling clock rates and temperatures as detailed in our Stress Test section below.

Cooling solution consists of a single 35 to 40 mm fan and copper heat pipe. We can notice no electronic noise or coil whine from our test unit
Cooling solution consists of a single 35 to 40 mm fan and copper heat pipe. We can notice no electronic noise or coil whine from our test unit
Fan is silent under most day-to-day loads and it only becomes audible when stressed for longer periods
Fan is silent under most day-to-day loads and it only becomes audible when stressed for longer periods
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Green: Prime95+FurMark stress)
Fan noise profile (White: Background, Red: System idle, Blue: 3DMark 06, Green: Prime95+FurMark stress)
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Micron 2200S 512GB
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
LG Gram 14T90N
UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8650U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1
Noise
-1%
-5%
1%
6%
-1%
off / environment *
26.1
29.3
-12%
29
-11%
28.3
-8%
28.2
-8%
30.1
-15%
Idle Minimum *
26.1
29.3
-12%
30
-15%
28.3
-8%
28.2
-8%
30.1
-15%
Idle Average *
26.1
29.3
-12%
30
-15%
28.3
-8%
28.2
-8%
30.1
-15%
Idle Maximum *
26.1
29.3
-12%
30
-15%
28.3
-8%
28.3
-8%
30.1
-15%
Load Average *
39.9
33.3
17%
35.2
12%
32.6
18%
28.2
29%
30.1
25%
Load Maximum *
44.7
33.3
26%
37
17%
36.6
18%
28.8
36%
32.02
28%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
26.1 / 26.1 / 26.1 dB(A)
Load
39.9 / 44.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26.1 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.132.335.236.62536.536.735.835.8312525.724.925.24024.724.123.824.4502022.220.322.16321.822.119.7208023.721.821.822.610024.320.120.122.512522.419.520.122.516021.417.516.623.420021.91716.623.525022.416.816.52531523.318.217.526.140024.61615.528.250027.215.115.231.263027.114.414.431.280027.513.913.730.8100026.713.713.731125025.913.613.730.7160027.313.613.632.2200029.813.413.833.3250029.413.613.733.5315030.51413.835.3400030.91413.836.1500028.113.813.934.4630024.813.81432800020.813.91428.1100001813.913.923.91250015.713.913.719.11600015.513.312.915.8SPL39.926.226.144.7N3.20.80.84.8median 24.8median 13.9median 13.9median 30.7Delta2.71.31.34.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseDell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G

Temperature

Surface temperatures will always be warmer on the left half of the laptop than the right due to the positioning of the processor within. Hot spots in this region can reach a toasty 48 C to 56 C as shown by our temperature maps below, but this is thankfully away from the frontal quadrants of the chassis and most of the keyboard keys.

Rear exhaust
Rear exhaust
AC adapter after running high loads for over an hour
AC adapter after running high loads for over an hour
Max. Load
 48.4 °C
119 F
40.2 °C
104 F
28.4 °C
83 F
 
 36 °C
97 F
36.6 °C
98 F
27 °C
81 F
 
 32.2 °C
90 F
27 °C
81 F
26.2 °C
79 F
 
Maximum: 48.4 °C = 119 F
Average: 33.6 °C = 92 F
29.8 °C
86 F
45 °C
113 F
55.2 °C
131 F
27.6 °C
82 F
36 °C
97 F
40 °C
104 F
27.2 °C
81 F
30.4 °C
87 F
34.2 °C
94 F
Maximum: 55.2 °C = 131 F
Average: 36.2 °C = 97 F
Power Supply (max.)  37.6 °C = 100 F | Room Temperature 20.8 °C = 69 F | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.8 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.2 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 36.5 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.4 °C / -6.2 F).
System idle (top)
System idle (top)
System idle (bottom)
System idle (bottom)
Maximum stress (top)
Maximum stress (top)
Maximum stress (bottom)
Maximum stress (bottom)

Stress Test

When running Prime95 to stress the CPU, clock rates would boost to about 3.6 GHz for the first couple of seconds until core temperature reaches 98 C. Clock rates would then stabilize at around 3.0 to 3.1 GHz for the next minute or so before finally cycling between 2.2 GHz and 3.3 GHz and 79 C to 98 C as shown by our screenshots below. This cycling behavior is not observed on most other laptops where fixed clock rates and temperatures are more common, but Dell favors it for the faster burst clock rates even if they are only temporary.

Running on battery will limit CPU performance. A 3DMark 11 run on battery power would return Physics and Graphics scores of 7118 and 1975 points, respectively, compared to 8315 and 1965 points when on mains.

System idle
System idle
Prime95 stress
Prime95 stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
Prime95+FurMark stress
CPU Clock (GHz) GPU Clock (MHz) Average CPU Temperature (°C)
System Idle -- -- 38
Prime95 Stress 2.2 - 3.2 -- 79 - 98
Prime95 + FurMark Stress 0.9 - 1.4 650 - 1050 74 - 92

Speakers

Stereo speakers along left and right edges of the chassis. High volume will cause the palm rests to vibrate slightly to the touch
Stereo speakers along left and right edges of the chassis. High volume will cause the palm rests to vibrate slightly to the touch
Pink noise at maximum volume. Bass reproduction is decent considering the small form factor
Pink noise at maximum volume. Bass reproduction is decent considering the small form factor
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.732.335.72536.536.736.53127.525.727.54026.124.126.15027.322.227.3632222.122802321.82310026.420.126.412537.919.537.916053.217.553.220056.21756.225058.416.858.431561.218.261.240061.21661.250060.115.160.163063.914.463.98006713.967100070.813.770.8125070.413.670.416006913.669200066.713.466.7250061.513.661.5315063.51463.5400068.71468.7500071.313.871.3630071.413.871.4800073.413.973.41000067.613.967.61250056.113.956.11600056.713.356.7SPL80.826.280.8N50.60.850.6median 63.5median 13.9median 63.5Delta61.3635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseDell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110GApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 9%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Energy Management

Power Consumption

Dell Latitude laptops have always been very power efficient due in part to having no discrete GPU options. Idling on desktop draws only between 2 W and 5 W even when on to the maximum brightness setting.

Interestingly, power consumption can be very high for an ULV subnotebook when under demanding loads because of the included 90 W (~13 x 6.8 x 2.2 cm) AC adapter. In comparison, most Ultrabooks come with 45 W or 60 W adapters instead. When running extreme loads like Prime95, consumption can spike to as high as 76 W which is good because that means the processor can run at higher Turbo Boost clock rates even if only for very short periods.

Relatively constant consumption when running 3DMark 06
Relatively constant consumption when running 3DMark 06
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Note the initial spike to 71 W for just a few seconds before falling and cycling between ~26 W and ~51 W. This behavior mirrors the cycling CineBench loop test results and clock rates recorded above
Prime95 initiated at 10s mark. Note the initial spike to 71 W for just a few seconds before falling and cycling between ~26 W and ~51 W. This behavior mirrors the cycling CineBench loop test results and clock rates recorded above
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Note the cycling power consumption rates again
Prime95+FurMark initiated at 10s mark. Note the cycling power consumption rates again
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.6 / 3.9 / 4.6 Watt
Load midlight 38.9 / 76.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 2200S 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14.00
LG Gram 14T90N
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Power Consumption
-40%
-9%
-37%
-3%
-42%
Idle Minimum *
2.6
3.2
-23%
2.9
-12%
2.7
-4%
2.6
-0%
3.6
-38%
Idle Average *
3.9
7
-79%
5.8
-49%
6.5
-67%
4.3
-10%
7.5
-92%
Idle Maximum *
4.6
8.9
-93%
6.2
-35%
11.5
-150%
5.5
-20%
9.4
-104%
Load Average *
38.9
47.6
-22%
32.9
15%
38.7
1%
32
18%
42
-8%
Load Maximum *
76.2
63.1
17%
48.5
36%
50.5
34%
78.8
-3%
51
33%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Life

Battery capacity is large for a 14-inch convertible form factor at 78 Wh. We're able to record 19 hours of real-world WLAN use before automatic shutdown to be a lot longer than most other subnotebooks. A smaller 52 Wh option is available for users who want a lighter system.

Charging from empty to full takes about two hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
48h 12min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
19h 01min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 22min
Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G
i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL
i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh
LG Gram 14T90N
i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh
HP Elitebook x360 1040 G5
i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1
i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T
i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh
Battery Runtime
-56%
-30%
-31%
-36%
-60%
Reader / Idle
2892
1966
-32%
1673
-42%
WiFi v1.3
1141
636
-44%
751
-34%
623
-45%
732
-36%
461
-60%
Load
202
64
-68%
153
-24%
187
-7%

Pros

+ quiet fan noise under low-medium loads
+ comfortable keyboard keys and clickpad
+ very power efficient; long battery life
+ proximity and IR sensors
+ universal USB-C charger
+ great build quality
+ optional WAN

Cons

- slight DPC latency issues with imperfect 4k60 video playback
- not many upgrades from the Latitude 7400 2-in-1
- slightly heavier than most 14-inch convertibles
- wireless pen is not included in packaging
- Intel UHD graphics only
- non-upgradeable RAM
- no webcam shutter
- no Ryzen options

Verdict

In review: Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G. Test unit provided by Dell US
In review: Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G. Test unit provided by Dell US

The good news is that the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 isn't all that different from the already excellent Latitude 7400 2-in-1. Dell didn't mess with a good thing and instead simply upgraded some components like the CPU and WLAN to remain competitive against the HP EliteBook x360 and Lenovo Yoga convertible series.

On the other hand, the bad news is that the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 isn't all that different from the already excellent Latitude 7400 2-in-1. It's a double-edged sword because users can purchase last year's Latitude 7400 2-in-1 for essentially the same experience and performance as the pricier 2020 Latitude 9410 2-in-1. Minor drawbacks like the lack of a proper webcam or brighter display options haven't been addressed and GPU options are still nonexistent, but they don't detract from a superb chassis design that's barely a year old.

Don't let the brand new name fool you because the Latitude 9410 2-in-1 is just a minor refresh of the already excellent Latitude 7400 2-in-1. It's still one of the best 14-inch business convertibles you can get right now even though it may not have the brightest display out there.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Dell Latitude 14 9410 2-in-1 P110G - 08/31/2020 v7
Allen Ngo

Chassis
89 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
71 / 75 → 95%
Weight
69 / 20-75 → 89%
Battery
92%
Display
85%
Games Performance
52 / 78 → 66%