MSI WS66 10TMT Workstation Laptop Review: Faster Than The Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition
The WS66 is MSI's latest ultra-thin mobile workstation derived from the GS66 gaming laptop to succeed last year's WS63 and WS65. It's a complete redesign when compared to the last generation model to better compete against other sleek Nvidia Studio workstations like the Razer Blade 15 Studio, Asus ProArt series, HP ZBook Studio, or the Dell Precision 5550.
Current SKUs range from the Core i7-10875H CPU, Quadro RTX 3000 GPU, and FHD touchscreen for $2500 up to the Core i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, and 4K UHD touchscreen for as much as $4000 depending on the RAM or storage.
We recommend checking out our existing reviews on the GS66 for more information on the chassis, keyboard, clickpad, and other physical features as the WS66 shares almost the same external design.
More MSI reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | MSI WS66 10TMT-207US i9-10980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 19.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Dell Precision 7550 W-10885M, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.8 kg | 27.36 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 | |
87 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 i7-10875H, Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 13.98 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
85.6 % v6 (old) | 09 / 2017 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2020 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 i7-9750H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 2.4 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case
The new case feels stronger than the last generation WS63, but it is still a step down from the Razer Blade 15 Studio. Creaking and bending is more noticeable on the MSI system than on the Razer.
Much like the jump from the GS63 to the GS66, the WS66 is both thicker and heavier than the older WS63 due to the gen-to-gen improvements to chassis rigidity and thermals. Despite this, it continues to be one of the slimmest workstations you can get that can be configured with both a Core i9 CPU and Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q GPU.
Connectivity
An easy way to distinguish the WS66 from the GS66 is by looking at their USB-A ports. The WS66 has only one USB-A port whereas the GS66 has three. In return, the WS66 gains a full-size SD card reader.
SD Card Reader
Transfer rates from the integrated SD reader are extremely fast. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes less than 5 seconds compared to almost 40 seconds on the MSI WE75.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 7550 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
MSI WE75 9TK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Precision 7550 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI WE75 9TK (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication
The Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. Interestingly, receive rates top out at about 900 Mbps when we know they are capable of much higher, but we otherwise experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 router.
Webcam
Maintenance
The bottom panel is secured by 9 Philips screws. Removing it is tricky because the sharp edges and corners are latched tightly to the base when compared to the bottom panels on the WS63 or Razer Blade 15 Studio.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no extras in the box other than the AC adapter and paperwork. MSI offers three-year limited warranty with on-site service as standard.
Input Devices
Keyboard
Key layout and feedback are identical to the GS66 for better or worse but with different font styles and secondary functions. The brightness hotkeys, for example, are switched on the WS66. We find the keys to be too shallow with weak feedback especially when compared to the superior keyboards on MSI's own WE or WT series. If you're already accustomed to typing on Ultrabooks, however, then the WS66 won't feel all that different.
Touchpad
The wide Precision clickpad (14 x 6.5 cm) is smooth with only a little sticking when gliding at slow speeds. Unfortunately, the integrated mouse buttons are soft in feedback with shallow travel for an unsatisfying experience. Furthermore, clicking on the right half of the clickpad feels spongier than the left half when it should be uniform from one edge to the other. The extra space is nice for multi-touch inputs, but we prefer the accuracy of dedicated mouse buttons like those on the MSI WT75.
An annoying consequence of the elongated clickpad is that your right palm will almost always be pressing on it while typing. Palm rejection isn't perfect and so you can expect some accidental mouse inputs every now and then.
Display
The AU Optronics B156HAB03.0 IPS panel here is the first to appear in our database. Contrast and brightness are both good for the category at about 900:1 and 363 nits, respectively, but some other ultra-thin workstations like the Precision 5550 are brighter, more colorful, and have deeper black levels for superior image quality. Black-white response times are average which is to be expected since this is not a gaming machine.
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 374.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 892:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US AU Optronics B156HAB03.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision 7550 AU Optronics B156ZAN, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Dell Precision 5550 P91F Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2400 | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung SDCA029, OLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US SAMSUNG LƒFL156FL02-101 , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 Chi Mei N156HCE-EN2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 33% | 38% | 42% | -22% | 36% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 62.8 | 82.1 31% | 89.9 43% | 99.9 59% | 47.43 -24% | 97.9 56% |
sRGB Coverage | 86.9 | 99.6 15% | 100 15% | 100 15% | 71.4 -18% | 99.9 15% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.6 | 96.8 52% | 99.9 57% | 97.3 53% | 49 -23% | 87.2 37% |
Response Times | -16% | -11% | 89% | 10% | 25% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 51.2 ? -14% | 46 ? -3% | 4 ? 91% | 36.8 ? 18% | 33 ? 26% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 34 ? -18% | 34 ? -18% | 4 ? 86% | 28.4 ? 1% | 22 ? 24% |
PWM Frequency | 1351 ? | |||||
Screen | -2% | 1% | 212% | -27% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 374.5 | 473.5 26% | 469.8 25% | 380 1% | 259.4 -31% | 343 -8% |
Brightness | 363 | 461 27% | 464 28% | 388 7% | 247 -32% | 309 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 90 -1% | 85 -7% | 93 2% | 85 -7% | 85 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.55 -31% | 0.42 -0% | 0.018 96% | 0.43 -2% | 0.22 48% |
Contrast | 892 | 861 -3% | 1119 25% | 21111 2267% | 603 -32% | 1559 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 4.8 -19% | 5.16 -27% | 5.47 -35% | 5.5 -36% | 3.73 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.17 | 8.73 -7% | 9.33 -14% | 8.19 -0% | 12.7 -55% | 6.51 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.36 | 3.08 29% | 3.75 14% | 3.04 30% | 1.43 67% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 5.6 -115% | 5.5 -112% | 5.3 -104% | 3.6 -38% | 4.24 -63% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.34 94% | 2 110% | 2.15 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7027 93% | 7549 86% | 6198 105% | 6128 106% | 7163 91% | 6329 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56.4 | 86.4 53% | 89.2 58% | 86 52% | 45 -20% | 78 38% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86.3 | 99.7 16% | 100 16% | 100 16% | 71 -18% | 100 16% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
3% | 9% /
6% | 114% /
165% | -13% /
-21% | 26% /
21% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space covers approximately 86 percent of sRGB to be an improvement over last year's WS63, but it's still smaller than the 100 percent coverage offered on most other mobile workstations. OLED options are not available here which would have granted DCI-P3 coverage.
X-Rite colorimeter measurements show a well-calibrated display out of the box as advertised by MSI. Color temperature is slightly on the cool side, but this can be addressed with an end-user calibration.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility is decent when under shade. Otherwise, bright ambient lighting will overwhelm onscreen content and cause glare. The glossy panel exhibits a slight purple reflection unlike on most other laptops which impacts colors if viewing from an angle.
Performance
Unlike the Razer Blade 15 Studio which is fixed at the Core i7-10875H, the WS66 offers Xeon and Core i9 options for ECC RAM support and faster raw computing power, respectively. RAM is configurable up to 64 GB compared to 128 GB on full-size workstations like the Dell Precision 7550. Optimus comes standard for automatic graphics switching.
We used MSI's Ultra Performance power profile with Cooler Boost active to run the performance benchmarks below for the highest scores possible.
Processor
CPU performance is excellent with CineBench Multi-Thread scores that are 25 to 30 percent higher than the under-performing Core i7-10875H in the Razer Blade 15 Studio. Performance sustainability is also respectable with a 10 percent drop over time as shown by our CineBench R15 xT loop graph below. Configuring with an Intel Xeon CPU will result in slightly slower processor performance but with the added benefit of ECC RAM.
See our page on the Core i9-10980HK for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (3526 - 4487, n=13) | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (465 - 507, n=13) | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (198 - 219, n=15) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1606 - 1862, n=15) | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (239 - 299, n=13) | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (1283 - 1401, n=12) | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (7634 - 8666, n=12) | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Intel Core i9-9900KS, Nvidia Titan RTX | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (12 - 14.6, n=13) | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (44 - 89, n=13) | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
HP Envy 15-ep0098nr | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i9-10980HK (0.561 - 0.596, n=13) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Dell Precision 7550 |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark benchmarks are consistently ahead of the Razer Blade 15 Studio likely due in part to the overall faster CPU performance mentioned above. We didn't experience any software issues during our time with the test unit, but we recommend becoming familiar with MSI Creator Center as performance and fan noise controls reside here.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4418 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5629 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5846 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues while opening multiple tabs on our homepage which is disappointing to see on a mobile workstation. 4K60 playback is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames during our minute-long YouTube test video.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Precision 7550 | |
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | |
Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 | |
Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
MSI WS66 10TMT-207US WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Dell Precision 7550 SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Dell Precision 5550 P91F SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Razer Blade 15 Studio Edition 2020 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | Acer ConceptD 3 Pro CN315-71P-73W1 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -30% | -117% | -18% | -47% | -22% | |
Seq Read | 2321 | 2028 -13% | 2039 -12% | 1982 -15% | 2133 -8% | 2973 28% |
Seq Write | 2620 | 1193 -54% | 1376 -47% | 2252 -14% | 1287 -51% | 2429 -7% |
4K Read | 48.57 | 42.31 -13% | 44.11 -9% | 47.13 -3% | 40.2 -17% | 24.7 -49% |
4K Write | 165.1 | 105.5 -36% | 113.3 -31% | 88.2 -47% | 114.6 -31% | 115.3 -30% |
4K-64 Read | 1712 | 1128 -34% | 1094 -36% | 1481 -13% | 710 -59% | 1243 -27% |
4K-64 Write | 2174 | 1537 -29% | 1630 -25% | 1842 -15% | 314 -86% | 835 -62% |
Access Time Read * | 0.057 | 0.069 -21% | 0.059 -4% | 0.087 -53% | 0.128 -125% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.068 | 0.106 -56% | 0.99 -1356% | 0.04 41% | 0.033 51% | 0.034 50% |
Score Read | 1993 | 1373 -31% | 1342 -33% | 1726 -13% | 962 -52% | 1565 -21% |
Score Write | 2601 | 1762 -32% | 1881 -28% | 2155 -17% | 557 -79% | 1193 -54% |
Score Total | 5630 | 3801 -32% | 3883 -31% | 4781 -15% | 1979 -65% | 3525 -37% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2589 | 1768 -32% | 2489 -4% | 1982 -23% | 2136 -17% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 791 | 627 -21% | 682 -14% | 501 -37% | 489.6 -38% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1625 | 1477 -9% | 1515 -7% | 1140 -30% | 1163 -28% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -16% | -17% | -6% | -27% | -19% | |
Write 4K | 185.8 | 121 -35% | 122.6 -34% | 132.9 -28% | 157.1 -15% | 113.2 -39% |
Read 4K | 47.21 | 42.16 -11% | 42.4 -10% | 46.73 -1% | 43.82 -7% | 31.1 -34% |
Write Seq | 2874 | 2150 -25% | 2167 -25% | 2214 -23% | 1110 -61% | 2540 -12% |
Read Seq | 1786 | 1755 -2% | 1747 -2% | 2018 13% | 1162 -35% | 2005 12% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 466.8 | 395.3 -15% | 388.8 -17% | 478.9 3% | 361.3 -23% | 331.4 -29% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 563 | 381.8 -32% | 367.3 -35% | 540 -4% | 563 0% | 368.3 -35% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3091 | 2730 -12% | 2629 -15% | 2975 -4% | 1558 -50% | 2535 -18% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3395 | 3468 2% | 3460 2% | 3195 -6% | 2635 -22% | 3427 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -23% /
-25% | -67% /
-81% | -12% /
-14% | -37% /
-39% | -21% /
-21% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is performing where we expect it to be relative to other laptops with the same GPU. Upgrading to thicker workstations like the Acer ConceptD 9 Pro or Eurocom Tornado F5W with the full-power Quadro RTX 5000 can give a 30 to 50 percent increase in graphics power.
See our dedicated page on the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
3DMark 11 Performance | 23789 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52005 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18226 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7920 points | |
Help |