Eluktronics RP-15 Laptop Review: The Ryzen 7 4800H Impresses Yet Again
Both OEMs and resellers are beginning to embrace AMD hardware much more than before all thanks to the promising 7 nm Renoir series. Eluktronics is one such reseller who is expected to ship its first 15.6-inch Ryzen 7 RP-15 gaming laptop by the end of July. The system is set to be fixed at the octa-core Ryzen 7 4800H CPU with GeForce RTX 2060 graphics and a 144 Hz 1080p matte display. More specifications and options on the RP-15 can be found on its product page here.
Direct competitors to the RP-15 include other thin-and-light 15.6-inch gaming laptops like the MSI GS66, Razer Blade 15, Asus Zephyrus S GX502, Lenovo Legion Y740-15, or the Acer Predator Triton series.
The RP-15 is derived from a white label chassis design meaning it's possible to find this exact model from other resellers under different brand names.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.6 % | 05/2020 | Eluktronics RP-15 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 1.9 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84 % | 05/2020 | MSI GS66 10SGS i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86 % | 05/2020 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
84.4 % | 08/2019 | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 25.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.1 % | 03/2019 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | 2.3 kg | 25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % | 09/2019 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | 2.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case
Our first impression of the RP-15 is how surprisingly lightweight the system is. At just 1.9 kg, it's a few hundred grams lighter than competing systems like the Razer Blade 15 Base Model while being slightly lighter than the Asus Zephyrus GX502. It's closest in weight and size to the last generation MSI GS65.
On the flip side, chassis rigidity takes a hit as the lid and base are more flexible than the latest systems from Razer, MSI, and others where metal alloy skeletons have become common. Expect some minor creaking when attempting to twist its base. This isn't to say that the system is weak or poorly built, but it's certainly not as sound as some of the heavier alternatives.
Connectivity
Port options are unique in that the RP-15 offers two mini-DisplayPort ports whereas most other gaming laptops have dropped them completely for DisplayPort-over-USB. Thunderbolt 3 is not supported, either.
SD Card Reader
Transfer rates from the integrated SD reader are slow. Moving 1 GB of images from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes about 28 seconds compared to just under 7 seconds on the Dell XPS 15 9500.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FTC-A8190T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GT75 8RG-090 Titan (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication
The Intel AX200 comes standard for Bluetooth 5.1 and Wi-Fi 6 connectivity. We experienced no connectivity issues when paired with our Netgear RAX200 router.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV |
Webcam
Maintenance
The bottom panel pops off easily after removing the 10 Philips screws. Owners get direct access to both SODIMM slots, both storage slots, WLAN module, and the internal battery.
Input Devices
Keyboard
The keys are light in feedback with moderate clatter when compared to the deeper and quieter keys of the MSI GS65. We still prefer it over the Blade 15 keyboard which we find to be too shallow. The NumPad and arrow keys are the same size as the main QWERTY keys unlike on most other gaming laptops.
Touchpad
The clickpad is decent in size (11.5 x 7.5 cm) but still smaller than the ones on the MSI GS66 (14 x 6.5 cm) or Razer Blade 15 (13 x 8.0 cm). Cursor control is otherwise reliable and silky smooth especially on a 144 Hz display. Gliding slowly across the surface results in some sticking which is normal for more precise clicks.
The integrated mouse keys have a loud and satisfying "click" when pressed. Feedback, however, is a bit on the spongy side. You're going to want an external mouse if you plan on doing a lot of dragging and dropping.
Display
The RP-15 uses the same 144 Hz BOE NV156FHM-N4G IPS panel as found on the Lenovo Legion Y540-15, Xiaomi Mi Gaming 15, and some Schenker laptops like the XMG Neo 15. Thus, these systems share similar characteristics including the fast black-white response times and good contrast ratio of nearly 900:1.
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 298.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 853:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 2.52
ΔE Greyscale 5.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.54
Eluktronics RP-15 BOE NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI GS66 10SGS AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Samsung SDCA029, AMOLED, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Panda LM156LF-GL02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICHg LP156WFG-SPB2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 9% | 38% | -36% | -0% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.7 | 69.9 10% | 99.9 57% | 40.13 -37% | 63.5 0% | 65.3 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 92 | 99.1 8% | 100 9% | 60.3 -34% | 92.4 0% | 95.1 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.2 | 71.1 9% | 97.4 49% | 41.48 -36% | 64.7 -1% | 65.9 1% |
Response Times | 20% | 80% | -99% | -18% | 10% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.2 ? | 11.2 ? 35% | 2.7 ? 84% | 26 ? -51% | 18.8 ? -9% | 16.4 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 10 ? 4% | 2.6 ? 75% | 25.6 ? -146% | 13.2 ? -27% | 8.8 ? 15% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 23810 ? | ||||
Screen | 33% | 19% | -35% | 6% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 298.6 | 339.4 14% | 366.7 23% | 290.1 -3% | 320.4 7% | 324.2 9% |
Brightness | 289 | 331 15% | 371 28% | 274 -5% | 298 3% | 304 5% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 92 2% | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 85 -6% | 90 0% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.24 31% | 0.54 -54% | 0.42 -20% | 0.38 -9% | |
Contrast | 853 | 1414 66% | 537 -37% | 763 -11% | 853 0% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.01 | 1.58 68% | 5.21 -4% | 5.16 -3% | 3.21 36% | 5.01 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.06 | 3.8 46% | 7.92 -12% | 18.09 -156% | 5.54 22% | 12.7 -80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.52 | 1.47 42% | 4.35 -73% | 2.36 6% | 1.64 35% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 2.3 57% | 2 63% | 4.4 19% | 3.6 33% | 7.9 -46% |
Gamma | 2.54 87% | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.27 97% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 7461 87% | 6952 93% | 6514 100% | 7362 88% | 6503 100% | 8455 77% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59.1 | 64.8 10% | 86.6 47% | 38.1 -36% | 59 0% | 60.8 3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.6 | 99.4 9% | 100 9% | 60 -34% | 92 0% | 95.5 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 21% /
27% | 46% /
33% | -57% /
-43% | -4% /
2% | 2% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space is approximately 59 percent and 92 percent of the AdobeRGB and sRGB standards, respectively, to be similar to most other high-end gaming laptops. Users looking for deeper colors may want to consider other gaming laptops with OLED options or professional models like the Asus ProArt series.
X-Rite measurements reveal a display in need of calibration and an overly cool color temperature. After calibrating the panel ourselves, grayscale and color DeltaE values would improve from 5.4 to 1.7 and 5.01 to 2.52, respectively. Apply our calibrated ICM profile above to get the most out of the display since it is capable of reproducing almost all of sRGB.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility is poor but otherwise average for its category since gaming laptop displays are not designed to overcome such bright ambient lighting. Remember to disable AMD Vari-Bright or else the maximum brightness of the display will drop to 263 nits.
Performance
Processor
Raw CPU performance is where the RP-15 really shines. When Fan Boost mode (i.e., maximum fan mode) is active, the system returns a CineBench R20 multi-thread score of 4663 points to be noticeably faster than most - if not all - mobile Intel octa-core CPUs at the moment. Performance sustainability is also excellent when running CineBench R15 in a loop as scores remain relatively consistent throughout.
The major downside is that the laptop must be set to Fan Boost mode in order to get the most out of the CPU. When the feature is disabled, performance would drop by almost 12 percent to be slower than the Ryzen 9 4900HS but still faster than the Core i7-10875H.
See our dedicated page on the Ryzen 7 4800H for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (462 - 491, n=17) | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
MSI GE63 Raider 8SG | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (248 - 299, n=15) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (4575 - 4743, n=15) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (1154 - 1207, n=17) | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (5920 - 8672, n=17) | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Eurocom Sky X4C i9-9900KS | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (10.8 - 14.1, n=16) | |
Eurocom Nightsky RX15 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (28.6 - 95.8, n=14) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (0.562 - 0.603, n=15) | |
Eluktronics RP-15 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 OLED XB-8DE51B0SP |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark benchmarks are where we expect them to be relative to other Core H-class gaming laptops with GeForce RTX graphics. We experenced no software or hardware issues during our time with the test unit.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4937 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5969 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5706 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback on YouTube is otherwise smooth with no dropped frames.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
MSI GS66 10SGS | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 | |
Eluktronics RP-15 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Two M.2 PCIe x4 bays are available for RAID configuration if desired. Our test unit comes with two 1 TB Phison PS5012 NVMe SSDs, but users can configure anywhere from none at all to 8 TB total.
We applaud the inclusion of a heat spreader for the M.2 SSDs which is uncommon for most laptops.
Eluktronics RP-15 Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD | MSI GS66 10SGS Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0328 Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Asus Strix GL531GV-PB74 Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Alienware m15 R2 P87F 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 24% | 13% | -16% | 18% | |
Seq Read | 509 | 1086 113% | 2021 297% | 1280 151% | 1925 278% |
Seq Write | 1743 | 1901 9% | 2090 20% | 905 -48% | 2371 36% |
4K Read | 55.8 | 51 -9% | 47.71 -14% | 48.73 -13% | 37.2 -33% |
4K Write | 185 | 117.3 -37% | 101.1 -45% | 107 -42% | 108.9 -41% |
4K-64 Read | 596 | 1503 152% | 856 44% | 321.1 -46% | 1177 97% |
4K-64 Write | 1746 | 1721 -1% | 1041 -40% | 761 -56% | 1135 -35% |
Access Time Read * | 0.047 | 0.059 -26% | 0.052 -11% | 0.058 -23% | 0.065 -38% |
Access Time Write * | 0.059 | 0.1 -69% | 0.111 -88% | 0.046 22% | 0.108 -83% |
Score Read | 703 | 1662 136% | 1105 57% | 498 -29% | 1407 100% |
Score Write | 2105 | 2029 -4% | 1351 -36% | 958 -54% | 1481 -30% |
Score Total | 3249 | 4588 41% | 3037 -7% | 1711 -47% | 3633 12% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2413 | 2155 -11% | 2474 3% | 1519 -37% | 2073 -14% |
Copy Program MB/s | 580 | 715 23% | 679 17% | 749 29% | 576 -1% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1311 | 1506 15% | 1037 -21% | 943 -28% | 1426 9% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -14% | -3% | -37% | 2% | |
Write 4K | 245.5 | 132.5 -46% | 118.7 -52% | 121.9 -50% | 108.8 -56% |
Read 4K | 62.8 | 45.03 -28% | 52.4 -17% | 53.6 -15% | 45.41 -28% |
Write Seq | 1853 | 1987 7% | 2247 21% | 967 -48% | 2467 33% |
Read Seq | 1770 | 1434 -19% | 2234 26% | 1461 -17% | 2456 39% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 565 | 467.5 -17% | 515 -9% | 431.4 -24% | 532 -6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 628 | 536 -15% | 584 -7% | 337.3 -46% | 590 -6% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1839 | 2003 9% | 2235 22% | 972 -47% | 2801 52% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3473 | 3306 -5% | 3171 -9% | 1727 -50% | 3172 -9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
10% | 5% /
7% | -27% /
-24% | 10% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 performs where we expect it to be relative to other laptops equipped with the same GPU. When compared to a "proper" desktop RTX 2060, raw performance is about 15 to 20 percent slower.
Enabling Fan Boost mode will increase GPU performance by about 9 percent according to 3DMark Fire Strike (15388 points to 16808 points).
See our dedicated page on the mobile GeForce RTX 2060 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons. This particular GPU pairs very well with a 144 Hz panel since it tends to run most newer games in the 40 to 60 FPS range.
3DMark 11 Performance | 19967 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37740 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15476 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 6600 points | |
Help |
low | med. | high | ultra | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 275.4 | 113.6 | 62.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 122 | 116 | 107 | 104 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 95.7 | 84.9 | 71.1 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 118 | 91 | 84 | 75 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 132.8 | 71.8 | 54.3 | 43 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 118.1 | 88.1 | 61 | 47.5 |
Emissions
System Noise
Fan noise is tied very closely to the preset Office, Gaming, and Fan Boost modes. If on Office mode, the system tends to hover around 32 dB(A) or lower when video streaming or browsing to be unobtrusive. If on Gaming or Fan Boost mode, however, fan noise would pulse higher and more frequently. Running Witcher 3 in Gaming mode and Fan Boost mode will cause a fan noise of 48.8 dB(A) and 54.1 dB(A), respectively, to be almost as loud as an Alienware m15 R2.