Notebookcheck

MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG Laptop Review: How Fast is a 95 W GeForce RTX 3070?

Amp(ere) it up. GeForce RTX 30 laptops are coming in like a wrecking ball meaning we're doing our best to find out which models come out on top or bottom. Let's see how the MSI GS66 and its GeForce RTX 3070 compare to other RTX laptops currently available.

MSI has been quick to jump in on the mobile GeForce RTX 30 bandwagon with plenty of updated models to choose from. The GS66, GE76, and GE66 are now all available with the latest Nvidia Ampere GPUs to replace last year's Turing options. Our GS66 10UG configuration comes with a GeForce RTX 3070 which MSI has confirmed with us to be targeting a 95 W TGP. There is also a new Core i7-10870H CPU to supplement the existing Core i7-10875H.

Other than the new CPU and GPU, the chassis remains visually identical to previous GS66 models. We recommend checking out our existing reviews on the GS66 to learn more about the physical features of the laptop as they all apply here as well. The GS66 competes directly with other ultra-thin high-performance 15.6-inch laptops like the Razer Blade 15, Lenovo Legion 7, Gigabyte Aero 15, and the Asus Zephyrus series

More MSI reviews:

MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG (GS66 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10870H 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 135 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8192 MB, Core: 1290 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, 461.40, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, SK Hynix, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 3ms, AUO328E, glossy: no, 300 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
Soundcard
Intel Comet Lake PCH-H - cAVS
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm
Networking
Intel/Killer E3100X 2.5 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.8 x 358 x 248 ( = 0.78 x 14.09 x 9.76 in)
Battery
99.9 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p IR
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Dragon Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.177 kg ( = 76.79 oz / 4.8 pounds), Power Supply: 885 g ( = 31.22 oz / 1.95 pounds)
Price
2400 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84 %
02/2021
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
84 %
05/2020
MSI GS66 10SGS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
2.2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
82 %
02/2021
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
08/2020
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2.1 kg17.8 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
01/2021
Aorus 15P WB
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.1 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
07/2020
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
2.3 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
Thicker, but stronger chassis design than the older GS65 series
Thicker, but stronger chassis design than the older GS65 series
Smooth matte metal surfaces attract fingerprints quickly
Smooth matte metal surfaces attract fingerprints quickly
Hinges are decent, but they could have been stiffer for a better sense of longevity
Hinges are decent, but they could have been stiffer for a better sense of longevity
Hinges can open the full 180 degrees unlike on most other gaming laptops. Lid isn't as rigid as on a Razer Blade
Hinges can open the full 180 degrees unlike on most other gaming laptops. Lid isn't as rigid as on a Razer Blade
Ports are packed tightly and positioned close upfront
Ports are packed tightly and positioned close upfront
Plenty of ventilation grilles all around the back half of the chassis
Plenty of ventilation grilles all around the back half of the chassis
360.3 mm / 14.2 inch 276 mm / 10.9 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.3 kg5 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 252 mm / 9.92 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2 kg4.51 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 244 mm / 9.61 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.1 kg4.56 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.2 kg4.78 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2.2 kg4.8 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 17.8 mm / 0.701 inch 2.1 kg4.73 lbs

Connectivity

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, 2.5 Gbps RJ-45
Right: 3.5 mm combo audio, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 2x USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2, 2.5 Gbps RJ-45
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: AC adapter, USB-C + Thunderbolt 3 w/ PD and DP, HDMI 2.0, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2
Left: AC adapter, USB-C + Thunderbolt 3 w/ PD and DP, HDMI 2.0, USB-A 3.2 Gen. 2

Communication

Removable Intel AX201 module for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. We experienced no notable wireless issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router
Removable Intel AX201 module for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 connectivity. We experienced no notable wireless issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (843min - 1528max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1375 (1240min - 1425max) MBit/s ∼99% +9%
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1349 (804min - 1497max) MBit/s ∼97% +7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1330 MBit/s ∼95% +5%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1290 MBit/s ∼93% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1263 (1093min - 1464max) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
MSI GS66 10SGS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1243 (1000min - 1395max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1240 (619min - 1284max) MBit/s ∼100% +14%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650w
1202 (1013min - 1346max) MBit/s ∼97% +10%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1120 MBit/s ∼90% +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1089 (603min - 1196max) MBit/s ∼88%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
973 MBit/s ∼78% -11%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1263 (1093-1464)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1069 (603-1196)

Webcam

ColorChecker
16.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG: 13.91 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 20.86 ∆E

Maintenance

MSI has made no major internal changes outside of the CPU and GPU swap. The cooling solution and components appear identical to what we observed on last year's Turing-powered GS66.

Accessories and Warranty

The retail box include a large velvet cloth in addition to the usual AC adapter and manuals. The standard one-year limited warranty applies with additional options if purchased from Xotic PC.

Input Devices

Same per-key RGB layout. The F7 secondary icon opens the Dragon Center software
Same per-key RGB layout. The F7 secondary icon opens the Dragon Center software
Very wide (14 x 6.5 cm) clickpad
Very wide (14 x 6.5 cm) clickpad
Crisp key feedback and relatively quiet clatter. Travel, however, feels shallower than the older GS65 series
Crisp key feedback and relatively quiet clatter. Travel, however, feels shallower than the older GS65 series
Large arrow keys while the adjacent Fn and Ctrl keys are smaller and softer
Large arrow keys while the adjacent Fn and Ctrl keys are smaller and softer

Display

The 300 Hz AU Optronics B156HAN12.0 IPS panel on our GS66 10UG is the same one as on last year's GS66 10SGS. Strangely, however, maximum brightness is noticeably dimmer this time at just 264 nits compared to 331 nits on the older model even after double-checking. We're not sure why this is happening as we can identify no automatic brightness controls or limiters, either.

Aside from the brightness discrepancy, other characteristics of the panel remain intact including the very fast response times, >1000:1 contrast ratio, and wide color space. Users should keep in mind that the 300 Hz refresh rate is useful even if you're unlikely to ever reach such high frame rates when gaming.

RGB subpixels are just slightly grainy due to the overlying matte layer
RGB subpixels are just slightly grainy due to the overlying matte layer
Minor uneven backlight bleeding
Minor uneven backlight bleeding
250
cd/m²
259.7
cd/m²
260.6
cd/m²
264.6
cd/m²
259.5
cd/m²
271.7
cd/m²
268.8
cd/m²
266.9
cd/m²
277.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 277.6 cd/m² Average: 264.4 cd/m² Minimum: 11.35 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 259.5 cd/m²
Contrast: 1038:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.52 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 63.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
MSI GS66 10SGS
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
LQ156M1JW26 (SHP1532), IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
AU Optronics B156HAN12.0, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Aorus 15P WB
BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
AU Optronics B156HAN, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1080
Response Times
18%
16%
55%
30%
40%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 (6.8, 7.6)
11.2 (6, 5.2)
22%
12 (6.8, 5.2)
17%
3.2 (1.4, 1.8)
78%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
39%
4 (1.6, 2.4)
72%
Response Time Black / White *
11.6 (7.6, 4)
10 (5.2, 4.8)
14%
10 (5.6, 4.4)
14%
8 (4, 4)
31%
9.2 (4.8, 4.4)
21%
10.8 (5.2, 5.6)
7%
PWM Frequency
23580 (30)
Screen
14%
-3%
-12%
-7%
-6%
Brightness middle
259.5
339.4
31%
286
10%
345.4
33%
275
6%
326.7
26%
Brightness
264
331
25%
275
4%
342
30%
268
2%
316
20%
Brightness Distribution
90
92
2%
91
1%
90
0%
91
1%
87
-3%
Black Level *
0.25
0.24
4%
0.25
-0%
0.34
-36%
0.33
-32%
0.33
-32%
Contrast
1038
1414
36%
1144
10%
1016
-2%
833
-20%
990
-5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.52
1.58
37%
2.43
4%
3.18
-26%
2.72
-8%
2.4
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
5.55
3.8
32%
6.33
-14%
6.57
-18%
4.45
20%
6.06
-9%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.93
1.47
24%
0.83
57%
1.77
8%
2.09
-8%
1.51
22%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.7
2.3
-35%
3.5
-106%
3.8
-124%
2.3
-35%
3.2
-88%
Gamma
2.04 108%
2.24 98%
2.32 95%
2.15 102%
2.266 97%
2.13 103%
CCT
6414 101%
6952 93%
7145 91%
7109 91%
6933 94%
7129 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
63.3
64.8
2%
68
7%
64.3
2%
65
3%
63.7
1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
98.8
99.4
1%
91
-8%
99
0%
90
-9%
99.2
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 15%
7% / -0%
22% / -2%
12% / -2%
17% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is identical to last year's high refresh rate 1080p panels at approximately 63 percent AdobeRGB and 99 percent sRGB. MSI is offering no 4K options at the moment for its GeForce RTX 30 GS66 refresh.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

The display is well-calibrated against the sRGB standard out of the box with average grayscale and ColorChcker deltaE values of just 1.7 and 2.52, respectively. These values would improve just marginally after calibrating the panel even further ourselves.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9714 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is worse than most Ultrabooks as the display is simply not as bright. The latest Dell XPS 15, for example, is over two times brighter than our MSI. For such a thin and light gaming laptop, we were hoping for a more vibrant display when traveling and working out of office.

Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Outdoors on a bright cloudy day
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade from extreme angles as expected
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade from extreme angles as expected

Performance

The Core i7-10870H is exactly the same as the Core i7-10875H with just a couple of minor differences. Firstly, base and maximum clock rates are each 100 MHz slower than the Core i7-10875H at 2.2 GHz vs. 2.3 GHz and 5 GHz vs. 5.1 GHz, respectively. Secondly, the CPU is not compatible with certain Intel security features including vPro and Trusted Execution that dedicated gaming laptops would likely never utilize, anyway. It was rumored that Intel introduced the Core i7-10870H to alleviate the supply issues some laptop makers were experiencing with the Core i7-10875H late last year.

Unless otherwise noted, our benchmarks below were performed on Extreme Performance mode. We recommend users become familiar with the MSI Dragon Center software as important performance and fan controls can be found here. Note that the Dragon Center real-time monitoring tool is prone to freezing whenever the CPU is at 100 percent utilization and so it is not always reliable.

Processor

Raw CPU performance is where we expect it to be according to CineBench benchmarks with scores that are just a few percentage points behind the Core i7-10875H. However, maximum Turbo Boost is not sustainable for long periods as exemplified by our CineBench R15 xT loop test. Performance would start out strong at almost 1650 points before falling to 1480 points and lower over time. Results would not change even after a retest. Note that we had set our system to Cooler Boost Turbo mode prior to starting the loop test and so the GS66 ought to be performing at its best under these conditions.

Despite the dip in clock rates, the Core i7-10870H can still offer 30 to 35 percent faster multi-thread performance than the Core i7-10750H on last year's GS66 to be roughly in between the competing AMD Ryzen 5 4600H and Ryzen 7 4800H.

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680Tooltip
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG Intel Core i7-10870H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1502 (1440.51-1640.55)
Schenker XMG Neo 15 Comet Lake Intel Core i7-10875H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1602 (1581.78-1657.55)
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L Intel Core i7-10875H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1627 (1603.72-1663.62)
Lenovo Legion 7 15IMH05-81YT001VGE Intel Core i9-10980HK; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1649 (1629.93-1670.36)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5476 Points ∼100% +46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
4733 Points ∼86% +26%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4435 Points ∼81% +18%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
3907 Points ∼71% +4%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
3759 Points ∼69%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
3713 Points ∼68% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (3365 - 3759, n=3)
3615 Points ∼66% -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
3224 Points ∼59% -14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
3133 Points ∼57% -17%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
2941 Points ∼54% -22%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
2822 Points ∼52% -25%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
2240 Points ∼41% -40%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
2168 Points ∼40% -42%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
569 Points ∼100% +20%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
564 Points ∼99% +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
560 Points ∼98% +18%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
489 Points ∼86% +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
477 Points ∼84% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
475 Points ∼83% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
473 Points ∼83%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (460 - 473, n=3)
469 Points ∼82% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
467 Points ∼82% -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
462 Points ∼81% -2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
457 Points ∼80% -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
454 Points ∼80% -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
428 Points ∼75% -10%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2267 (2246.56min - 2267.32max) Points ∼100% +38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
2020 (1865.06min - 2020.1max) Points ∼89% +23%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1926 Points ∼85% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1641 - 1740, n=3)
1703 Points ∼75% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1664 (1603.72min - 1663.62max) Points ∼73% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
1641 (1440.51min - 1640.55max) Points ∼72%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1635 (1518.31min - 1635.12max) Points ∼72% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1398 (1313.46min - 1397.77max) Points ∼62% -15%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1343 Points ∼59% -18%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1282 Points ∼57% -22%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
1211 Points ∼53% -26%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
940 Points ∼41% -43%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
907 Points ∼40% -45%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
235 Points ∼100% +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
211 Points ∼90% +6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
201 Points ∼86% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (199 - 204, n=3)
201 Points ∼86% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
199 Points ∼85%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
198 Points ∼84% -1%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
197 Points ∼84% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
192 Points ∼82% -4%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
190 Points ∼81% -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼80% -6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
187 Points ∼80% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼80% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
178 Points ∼76% -11%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
531 Seconds * ∼100% -82%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
481.4 Seconds * ∼91% -65%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
435.2 Seconds * ∼82% -49%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
388.5 Seconds * ∼73% -33%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
363 Seconds * ∼68% -24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
345 Seconds * ∼65% -18%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
295 Seconds * ∼56% -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
292 Seconds * ∼55%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (288 - 292, n=3)
291 Seconds * ∼55% -0%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
261 Seconds * ∼49% +11%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
255 Seconds * ∼48% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
249 Seconds * ∼47% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
219 Seconds * ∼41% +25%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5669 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5633 MIPS ∼99% +6%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
5391 MIPS ∼95% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
5312 MIPS ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (5244 - 5312, n=3)
5281 MIPS ∼93% -1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
5227 MIPS ∼92% -2%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5138 MIPS ∼91% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
5114 MIPS ∼90% -4%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4951 MIPS ∼87% -7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
4871 MIPS ∼86% -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
4865 MIPS ∼86% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4664 MIPS ∼82% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
4471 MIPS ∼79% -16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
62340 MIPS ∼100% +41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
59680 MIPS ∼96% +35%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
48326 MIPS ∼78% +9%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47941 MIPS ∼77% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (44272 - 46431, n=3)
45377 MIPS ∼73% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
44272 MIPS ∼71%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
43786 MIPS ∼70% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
36693 MIPS ∼59% -17%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
36524 MIPS ∼59% -18%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
34101 MIPS ∼55% -23%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
32555 MIPS ∼52% -26%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
24910 MIPS ∼40% -44%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
24768 MIPS ∼40% -44%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1467 Points ∼100% +15%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1445 Points ∼99% +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1410 Points ∼96% +10%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
1309 Points ∼89% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1280 - 1288, n=3)
1284 Points ∼88% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
1283 Points ∼87% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
1280 Points ∼87%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
1242 Points ∼85% -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1241 Points ∼85% -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1235 Points ∼84% -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1207 Points ∼82% -6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
1200 Points ∼82% -6%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1188 Points ∼81% -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
1108 Points ∼76% -13%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9086 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
7910 Points ∼87% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
7755 Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (7693 - 7758, n=3)
7735 Points ∼85% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
7634 Points ∼84% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
7583 Points ∼83% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
6906 Points ∼76% -11%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
6336 Points ∼70% -18%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
5911 Points ∼65% -24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
5813 Points ∼64% -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
5260 Points ∼58% -32%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
4909 Points ∼54% -37%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4722 Points ∼52% -39%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4720 Points ∼52% -39%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
17.1 fps ∼100% +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
13.8 fps ∼81% +10%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
13.5 fps ∼79% +7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
12.6 fps ∼74%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (12.4 - 12.9, n=3)
12.6 fps ∼74% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
12.2 fps ∼71% -3%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.1 fps ∼71% -4%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.3 fps ∼60% -18%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
9.38 fps ∼55% -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
9.27 fps ∼54% -26%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.3 fps ∼49% -34%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.78 fps ∼45% -38%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
6.73 fps ∼39% -47%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
64.1 s * ∼100% -33%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
61.7 s * ∼96% -28%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
60.7 s * ∼95% -26%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
60.16 s * ∼94% -25%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
59.75 s * ∼93% -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
54.9 s * ∼86% -14%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
52.4 s * ∼82% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (48.2 - 54.3, n=3)
51.9 s * ∼81% -8%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
51.1 s * ∼80% -6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
48.2 s * ∼75%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
47.1 s * ∼73% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
44.8 s * ∼70% +7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
23.85 s * ∼37% +51%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 15 W500G5T
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.643 sec * ∼100% -8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SE-045
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.639 sec * ∼99% -7%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.63 sec * ∼98% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-44-R5FT
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
0.626 sec * ∼97% -5%
MSI Summit E15 A11SCST
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.615 sec * ∼96% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S15 GX502L
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.597 sec * ∼93% -0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.595 sec * ∼93%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
Intel Core i9-10980HK
0.592 sec * ∼92% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (0.586 - 0.595, n=3)
0.59 sec * ∼92% +1%
Aorus 15P WB
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.586 sec * ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.583 sec * ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
0.538 sec * ∼84% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.507 sec * ∼79% +15%
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1641 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
133 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
199 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark results are within single-digit percentage points of other GeForce RTX-powered laptops including those from the older Turing series. In other words, it doesn't appear that the gen-to-gen GPU performance advantage of mobile Ampere is wide enough to really impact PCMark scores.

PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9448 Points ∼61% +13%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
8855 Points ∼57% +6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8376 Points ∼54%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
8266 Points ∼53% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8001 Points ∼52% -4%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7023 Points ∼45% -16%
Productivity
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9298 Points ∼83% +18%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
8522 Points ∼76% +8%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8503 Points ∼76% +8%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
8111 Points ∼73% +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7873 Points ∼71%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
7860 Points ∼70% 0%
Essentials
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10341 Points ∼90% +10%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9748 Points ∼85% +3%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
9641 Points ∼84% +2%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
9540 Points ∼83% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9437 Points ∼82%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9378 Points ∼82% -1%
Score
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6739 Points ∼77% +10%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
6301 Points ∼72% +3%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
6255 Points ∼71% +2%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6154 Points ∼70% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6121 Points ∼70%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6088 Points ∼69% -1%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6825 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6300 Points ∼92%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
6224 Points ∼91% -1%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
6219 Points ∼91% -1%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
5556 Points ∼81% -12%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
5840 Points ∼93% +22%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
5702 Points ∼91% +19%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
4792 Points ∼76%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4579 Points ∼73% -4%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
4410 Points ∼70% -8%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4792 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6300 points
PCMark 10 Score
6121 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows no major latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is smooth but not perfect with 8 dropped frames during our minute-long video test.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1768.4 μs * ∼100% -82%
MSI GS66 10SGS
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
1387.9 μs * ∼78% -43%
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H, 2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
1206.3 μs * ∼68% -24%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1122 μs * ∼63% -15%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
973.9 μs * ∼55%
Aorus 15P WB
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
798.6 μs * ∼45% +18%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
Two internal M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 slots with RAID 0 compatibility. The drive will differ depending on the reseller. Xotic PC has equipped our unit with a high-end WD SN730 NVMe SSD supporting sequential read and write rates of up to 3400 MB/s and 3100 MB/s, respectively
Two internal M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 slots with RAID 0 compatibility. The drive will differ depending on the reseller. Xotic PC has equipped our unit with a high-end WD SN730 NVMe SSD supporting sequential read and write rates of up to 3400 MB/s and 3100 MB/s, respectively
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
MSI GS66 10SGS
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX516PR
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
Aorus 15P WB
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)
Alienware m15 R3 P87F
2x Micron 2200S 512 GB (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-11%
-20%
-9%
-18%
-40%
Copy Game MB/s
1546.36
1505.93
-3%
1417.51
-8%
1061.84
-31%
1492.7
-3%
Copy Program MB/s
689.92
715.1
4%
572.83
-17%
575.62
-17%
668.95
-3%
Copy ISO MB/s
2235.78
2155.37
-4%
1793.08
-20%
2192.11
-2%
1684.53
-25%
Score Total
5513
4588
-17%
4105
-26%
5103
-7%
2659
-52%
3968
-28%
Score Write
2537
2029
-20%
1869
-26%
2310
-9%
1155
-54%
1565
-38%
Score Read
1956
1662
-15%
1516
-22%
1840
-6%
989
-49%
1580
-19%
Access Time Write *
0.098
0.1
-2%
0.055
44%
0.112
-14%
0.031
68%
0.388
-296%
Access Time Read *
0.056
0.059
-5%
0.093
-66%
0.057
-2%
0.054
4%
0.062
-11%
4K-64 Write
2161.9
1721.47
-20%
1649.93
-24%
2004.71
-7%
826.84
-62%
1270.68
-41%
4K-64 Read
1692.27
1502.66
-11%
1209.4
-29%
1594.37
-6%
712.95
-58%
1334.41
-21%
4K Write
115.5
117.25
2%
68.99
-40%
96.51
-16%
116.18
1%
62.93
-46%
4K Read
43.81
50.96
16%
39.65
-9%
50.19
15%
52.3
19%
39.72
-9%
Seq Write
2595.61
1901.41
-27%
1501.32
-42%
2092.37
-19%
2120.62
-18%
2315.59
-11%
Seq Read
2197.73
1086.4
-51%
2671.27
22%
1956.71
-11%
2240.9
2%
2058.19
-6%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-10%
-13%
3%
3%
-7%
Write 4K
163.1
132.5
-19%
129.6
-21%
139.8
-14%
131.7
-19%
67.32
-59%
Read 4K
48.97
45.03
-8%
44.71
-9%
48.62
-1%
55.65
14%
41.47
-15%
Write Seq
2607
1987
-24%
1929
-26%
2260
-13%
2273
-13%
2239
-14%
Read Seq
2316
1434
-38%
2035
-12%
2135
-8%
2533
9%
2112
-9%
Write 4K Q32T1
338
467.5
38%
425.9
26%
499.3
48%
475.1
41%
488.9
45%
Read 4K Q32T1
475.6
536
13%
433.4
-9%
551.8
16%
589.6
24%
556.7
17%
Write Seq Q32T1
3090
2003
-35%
1390
-55%
2960
-4%
2373
-23%
2654
-14%
Read Seq Q32T1
3421
3306
-3%
3505
2%
3269
-4%
3068
-10%
3137
-8%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-11% / -10%
-17% / -17%
-3% / -5%
-8% / -10%
-24% / -28%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3421 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3090 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 475.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 338 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2316 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2607 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.97 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 163.1 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740750760770780790800810820830840850860870880890900910920930940950960970980990100010101020103010401050106010701080109011001110112011301140115011601170118011901200121012201230124012501260127012801290130013101320133013401350136013701380139014001410142014301440145014601470148014901500151015201530154015501560157015801590160016101620163016401650166016701680169017001710172017301740175017601770178017901800181018201830184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010202020302040205020602070208020902100211021202130214021502160217021802190220022102220223022402250226022702280229023002310232023302340235023602370238023902400241024202430244024502460247024802490250025102520253025402550256025702580259026002610262026302640265026602670268026902700271027202730274027502760277027802790280028102820283028402850286028702880289029002910292029302940295029602970298029903000301030203030304030503060307030803090310031103120313031403150316031703180319032003210322032303240325032603270328032903300331033203330334033503360337033803390340034103420Tooltip
: Ø3404 (3209.61-3419.11)

GPU Performance

The mobile GeForce RTX 3070 here is about 20 percent faster than the GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q in last year's GS66 10SGS or 30 percent faster than the 2070 Super Max-Q in the GS66 10SFS. The gen-to-gen gains are nowhere near the desktop RTX 3070 as the desktop version offers about 50 percent faster graphics power than our mobile version. Overall gaming performance is neck-to-neck with the desktop RTX 2070.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy (Cooler Boost off)
Time Spy (Cooler Boost off)
Time Spy (Cooler Boost on)
Time Spy (Cooler Boost on)
Time Spy (Battery power)
Time Spy (Battery power)
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
11238 Points ∼100% +105%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X
8191 Points ∼73% +49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
6934 Points ∼62% +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (4725 - 6427, n=5)
5854 Points ∼52% +7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H
5481 Points ∼49%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
4657 Points ∼41% -15%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
4280 Points ∼38% -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17467 Points ∼100% +91%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X
13579 Points ∼78% +49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
11407 Points ∼65% +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7888 - 10898, n=7)
9802 Points ∼56% +7%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9364 Points ∼54% +3%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H
9131 Points ∼52%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7826 Points ∼45% -14%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7732 Points ∼44% -15%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
7618 Points ∼44% -17%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
7084 Points ∼41% -22%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
6123 Points ∼35% -33%
Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
6123 Points ∼35% -33%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points ∼21% -60%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
3515 Points ∼20% -62%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
15712 Points ∼100% +72%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X
12889 Points ∼82% +41%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
11194 Points ∼71% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7358 - 10679, n=7)
9598 Points ∼61% +5%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
9284 Points ∼59% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H
9140 Points ∼58%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
7878 Points ∼50% -14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
7718 Points ∼49% -16%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
7475 Points ∼48% -18%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
7272 Points ∼46% -20%
Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
6261 Points ∼40% -31%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
6258 Points ∼40% -32%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3795 Points ∼24% -58%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
3765 Points ∼24% -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
40910 Points ∼100% +71%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X
31096 Points ∼76% +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
28493 Points ∼70% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (20703 - 27980, n=7)
25495 Points ∼62% +7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H
23893 Points ∼58%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
23373 Points ∼57% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
21004 Points ∼51% -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
20117 Points ∼49% -16%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
19338 Points ∼47% -19%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
18992 Points ∼46% -21%
Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
16488 Points ∼40% -31%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
16362 Points ∼40% -32%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points ∼28% -53%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
9778 Points ∼24% -59%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17096 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
15985 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H
15796 Points ∼92%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
15792 Points ∼92% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (15054 - 15796, n=3)
15487 Points ∼91% -2%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X
15444 Points ∼90% -2%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13950 Points ∼82% -12%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13742 Points ∼80% -13%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
13592 Points ∼80% -14%
Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
13061 Points ∼76% -17%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
11840 Points ∼69% -25%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
10992 Points ∼64% -30%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
10473 Points ∼61% -34%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points ∼40% -57%
1280x720 Performance GPU
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
47287 Points ∼100% +52%
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, R9 5900X
40646 Points ∼86% +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 15 SE GX551QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
38532 Points ∼81% +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (31092 - 37290, n=4)
34420 Points ∼73% +11%
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2070 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop), R7 2700X
31595 Points ∼67% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H
31092 Points ∼66%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-10750H
27298 Points ∼58% -12%
MSI GS66 10SGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H
26855 Points ∼57% -14%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), R7 2700X
26413 Points ∼56% -15%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10SFS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i9-10980HK
25135 Points ∼53% -19%
Asus Zephyrus M15 GU502LU-BI7N4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
22670 Points ∼48% -27%
Aorus 5 KB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H
22138 Points ∼47% -29%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1206ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, R5 4600H
12946 Points ∼27% -58%
Asus GX531GM (Zephyrus S)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points ∼27% -59%
3DMark 11 Performance
25114 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
49338 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
19754 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9140 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (113 - 156, n=2)
135 fps ∼100% +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (115 - 122, n=2)
119 fps ∼88% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (105 - 109, n=2)
107 fps ∼79% +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (90.6 - 108, n=3)
99.2 fps ∼73% +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (87.5 - 88.9, n=2)
88.2 fps ∼65% +1%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
87.5 fps ∼65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
  (60.8 - 90.6, n=5)
81.9 fps ∼61% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼58% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (74 - 81.4, n=5)
77.7 fps ∼58% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (55.1 - 62.9, n=3)
59.7 fps ∼44% -32%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (132 - 205, n=2)
169 fps ∼100% +52%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (148 - 159, n=2)
154 fps ∼91% +39%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (133 - 140, n=2)
137 fps ∼81% +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (117 - 129, n=2)
123 fps ∼73% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (111 - 115, n=2)
113 fps ∼67% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
111 fps ∼66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
  (83.9 - 122, n=5)
111 fps ∼66% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (100 - 106, n=5)
103 fps ∼61% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼61% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (80 - 87.9, n=2)
84 fps ∼50% -24%
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (190 - 209, n=2)
200 fps ∼100% +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (148 - 228, n=2)
188 fps ∼94% +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (176 - 177, n=2)
177 fps ∼89% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼78% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
  (107 - 193, n=5)
154 fps ∼77% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
151 fps ∼76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
150 fps ∼75% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (145 - 151, n=2)
148 fps ∼74% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (125 - 127, n=2)
126 fps ∼63% -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
 
118 fps ∼59% -22%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (145 - 152, n=2)
149 fps ∼100% +66%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (121 - 123, n=3)
122 fps ∼82% +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (90.2 - 108, n=4)
99.8 fps ∼67% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (76.7 - 110, n=7)
95.9 fps ∼64% +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (82.2 - 105, n=16)
95.6 fps ∼64% +7%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89.7 (83min - 95max) fps ∼60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (65.7 - 92.7, n=22)
79.2 fps ∼53% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
  (40.9 - 95, n=5)
79.2 fps ∼53% -12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (64 - 82.1, n=21)
74.3 fps ∼50% -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (56 - 83.8, n=29)
65.8 fps ∼44% -27%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (286 - 320, n=2)
303 fps ∼100% +99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (176 - 244, n=4)
222 fps ∼73% +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (155 - 208, n=4)
181 fps ∼60% +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (126 - 194, n=15)
171 fps ∼56% +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (126 - 187, n=6)
155 fps ∼51% +2%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
152.6 (141min - 166max) fps ∼50%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (117 - 180, n=19)
144 fps ∼48% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
  (80 - 171, n=5)
143 fps ∼47% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (116 - 161, n=17)
140 fps ∼46% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (86.5 - 151, n=21)
121 fps ∼40% -21%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (375 - 413, n=2)
394 fps ∼100% +60%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (350 - 449, n=3)
387 fps ∼98% +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
 
289 fps ∼73% +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (243 - 265, n=3)
252 fps ∼64% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (158 - 284, n=9)
247 fps ∼63% 0%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
246.7 (233min - 257max) fps ∼63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (193 - 259, n=15)
226 fps ∼57% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (154 - 250, n=12)
222 fps ∼56% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
  (145 - 254, n=17)
205 fps ∼52% -17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Desktop)
  (91 - 251, n=6)
191 fps ∼48% -23%
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
  (407 - 548, n=3)
469 fps ∼100% +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (427 - 446, n=2)
437 fps ∼93% +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (264 - 672, n=4)
385 fps ∼82% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (342 - 368, n=2)
355 fps ∼76% +6%
MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
335.9 (312min - 379max) fps ∼72%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (196 - 414, n=9)