Notebookcheck

MSI GL65 9SEK Laptop Review: Much More Portable than the GL63

Allen Ngo 👁, 10/02/2019

4 hours of battery life... at most. The GL65 is a huge upgrade over the GL63 in terms of visuals, weight, performance, and size. On the other hand, other key aspects like battery life, ports, brightness, and display quality have barely changed at all. This $1500 mid-range gaming machine can sometimes feel like a budget gaming laptop at times.

The MSI GL65 directly succeeds the GL63 by introducing a brand new narrow bezel design to the 15.6-inch GL6x series. Aside from the new look, it also brings Intel 9th gen Core i7 CPUs and Nvidia Turing GPUs to supplant the 8th gen CPUs and Pascal GPUs of the previous generation model. The mid-range GL65 is designed to sit below the higher-end GS65 in terms of looks and specifications.

All current SKUs can be configured with the Core i5-9300H or i7-9750H CPU and the GeForce GTX 1650, GTX 1660 Ti, or RTX 2060 GPU. Display options include only 1080p IPS at either 60 Hz or 120 Hz. Our specific test unit is the higher-end configuration with the Core i7 CPU, RTX 2060 GPU, and 1080p120 display retailing for about $1450 USD.

Direct competitors to the MSI GL65 include other mid-range 15.6-inch gaming laptops like the Lenovo Legion Y740-15ICH, Dell G7 15, Gigabyte Aorus 5 or Aorus 15, Asus Zephyrus G GU502, and the recently released Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti.

We recommend checking out our existing review on the MSI GP65 since it shares a very similar chassis design with the GL65.

More MSI reviews:

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Especially English native speakers welcome!

Currently wanted: 
News and Editorial Editor - Details here

MSI GL65 9SEK (GL65 Series)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop) - 6144 MB, Core: 1110 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 425.31, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, AUOD0ED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM370
Storage
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, 512 GB 
,
Soundcard
Nvidia TU106 - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
5 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: SD reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5)
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27.5 x 357.7 x 248 ( = 1.08 x 14.08 x 9.76 in)
Battery
51 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2W, Keyboard: Chiclet SteelSeries, Keyboard Light: yes, MSI Dragon Center, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg ( = 81.13 oz / 5.07 pounds), Power Supply: 770 g ( = 27.16 oz / 1.7 pounds)
Price
1450 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case

Most of our comments on the GP65 chassis apply here on the GL65. The main visual difference between them is that the outer lid of the former incorporates additional design elements whereas the outer lid of the GL65 is completely flat. Chassis materials and texture are otherwise identical.

Exact same dimensions and chassis design as the GP65
Exact same dimensions and chassis design as the GP65
Despite being smaller than the GL63, the GL65 is actually slightly heavier by almost 100 g
Despite being smaller than the GL63, the GL65 is actually slightly heavier by almost 100 g
Much narrower bezels than the older GL63 series
Much narrower bezels than the older GL63 series
Lid opened to maximum angle (~150 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum angle (~150 degrees)
Hinges are small and satisfactory. However, they could be firmer at wider angles to reduce teetering
Hinges are small and satisfactory. However, they could be firmer at wider angles to reduce teetering
Base and lid are not as rigid as on the Razer Blade 15 series
Base and lid are not as rigid as on the Razer Blade 15 series
383 mm / 15.1 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 29 mm / 1.142 inch 2.2 kg4.85 lbs357.7 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 27.5 mm / 1.083 inch 2.3 kg5.07 lbs360.5 mm / 14.2 inch 276 mm / 10.9 inch 18.3 mm / 0.72 inch 2.2 kg4.76 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 2 kg4.35 lbs360 mm / 14.2 inch 268 mm / 10.6 inch 15.75 mm / 0.62 inch 2.1 kg4.63 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 250 mm / 9.84 inch 19 mm / 0.748 inch 2.1 kg4.68 lbs

Connectivity

Port options and even positioning are almost identical to the last generation GL63. The only main difference is that the AC adapter port is now closer to the front instead of towards the rear corner. It's not recommended to use the GL63 AC adapter on the GL65 since the latter ships with a more capable adapter (180 W vs. 135 W).

Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.1, AC adapter
Right: SD reader, 2x USB 3.1, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, Mini-DisplayPort, USB 3.1, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm headphone (SPDIF)
Left: Kensington Lock, RJ-45, HDMI 1.4, Mini-DisplayPort, USB 3.1, USB 3.1 Type-C Gen. 1, 3.5 mm earphones, 3.5 mm headphone (SPDIF)

SD Card Reader

While we appreciate the fact that the system integrates a full-size spring-loaded SD card reader, its very slow transfer rates are hard to forgive. Transferring 1 GB worth of images from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes about 45 seconds compared to just ~8 seconds on the Dell XPS 15. The slow speed can be frustrating for content creators who rely on SD readers.

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
197 MB/s ∼100% +742%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
172.4 MB/s ∼88% +637%
MSI GL65 9SEK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
23.4 MB/s ∼12%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
15.2 MB/s ∼8% -35%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s ∼100% +758%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.1 MB/s ∼79% +581%
MSI GL65 9SEK
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
28.2 MB/s ∼12%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
21.77 MB/s ∼9% -23%

Communication

The Intel 9560 offers Wi-Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5 connectivity. Strangely, transmit speeds are only about half of what the module is capable of. We're able to record an average transmit rate of 355 Mbps compared to 620 Mbps on the MSI GS65 equipped with the exact same Intel 9560. Other than this performance oddity, we experienced no wireless issues with the GL65.

Removable M.2 WLAN module
Removable M.2 WLAN module
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
696 MBit/s ∼100% +9%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s ∼95% +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
637 MBit/s ∼92%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
Intel Wireless AC 9462
340 MBit/s ∼49% -47%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s ∼100% +91%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
620 MBit/s ∼91% +75%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
355 MBit/s ∼52%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
Intel Wireless AC 9462
224 MBit/s ∼33% -37%

Maintenance

The bottom panel is secured by 12 Philips screws that will unfortunately require tearing a factory seal sticker to service. Once inside, upgrading core components like RAM, WLAN, battery, or the two storage bays becomes simple.

Relatively easy access with a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge
Relatively easy access with a Philips screwdriver and sharp edge
Last generation MSI GL63 for comparison. Internal layout has not changed very much
Last generation MSI GL63 for comparison. Internal layout has not changed very much

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras included in the retail box. The standard one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies.

Input Devices

Keyboard and Touchpad

The keyboard and trackpad (11 x 6.3 cm) are identical to the GP65. Keep in mind that some lower-end SKUs have single-zone red keyboard backlight only whereas this GeForce RTX SKU includes per-key RGB lighting.

We applaud MSI for using the SteelSeries keyboard across most G series laptops in order to give a consistent look and feel between models and generations. If you have typed on an MSI G series laptop before, then you will already have a good idea of how the GL65 keyboard will feel.

Familiar SteelSeries keyboard layout with Turbo Fan and Dragon Center buttons
Familiar SteelSeries keyboard layout with Turbo Fan and Dragon Center buttons
The dedicated mouse keys are shallow in travel with firm feedback and a very loud click when pressed
The dedicated mouse keys are shallow in travel with firm feedback and a very loud click when pressed
Key feedback and travel are not unlike on the GS or GP series
Key feedback and travel are not unlike on the GS or GP series
Full-size Arrow keys with slightly narrower NumPad keys
Full-size Arrow keys with slightly narrower NumPad keys

Display

Unlike the LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6 IPS panel on the GL63, the GL65 ships with an AU Optronics B156HAN13.0 IPS panel instead. This particular 120 Hz panel can be found on no other laptop in our database as of this writing. Unfortunately, this is a budget-midrange panel with its slow response times and narrow gamut as shown by our table below. The Sharp LQ156M1JW03 panel on the more expensive MSI GS65 offers both significantly faster black-white response times to reduce ghosting and more accurate colors.

Subjectively, onscreen content looks crisp despite the matte overlay. Colors, however, are not as deep as what you'd find on the GS65 or the pricier Razer Blade 15 OLED. Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of the display is its moderate-heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom corners. The bleeding is immediately noticeable during a cold boot or when viewing videos with black borders. This would be easy to forgive on a cheap multimedia laptop, but MSI has no excuse on this RTX-powered laptop retailing for almost $1500 USD.

Matte overlay with no glossy, 4K UHD, or touchscreen options
Matte overlay with no glossy, 4K UHD, or touchscreen options
Narrow bezels akin to the GS65
Narrow bezels akin to the GS65
Heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom corners and top edge
Heavy uneven backlight bleeding along the bottom corners and top edge
Matte subpixel array
Matte subpixel array
253
cd/m²
270.6
cd/m²
252.9
cd/m²
239.6
cd/m²
277.3
cd/m²
245.9
cd/m²
244.5
cd/m²
274.7
cd/m²
248.6
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 277.3 cd/m² Average: 256.3 cd/m² Minimum: 5.37 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 277.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1387:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.25 | 0.6-29.43 Ø6, calibrated: 4.39
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.64-98 Ø6.2
55% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
MSI GL65 9SEK
AU Optronics B156HAN13.0, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK6, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IGZO, 15.6, 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
Sharp LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6, 1920x1080
Response Times
-4%
54%
53%
71%
55%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
26.4 (13.2, 13.2)
33.6 (16.8, 16.8)
-27%
13.6 (8, 5.6)
48%
15.2 (7.6, 7.6)
42%
7 (3.6, 3.4)
73%
16.4 (7.6, 6.8)
38%
Response Time Black / White *
30 (17.6, 12.4)
24 (13.2, 10.8)
20%
12 (7.6, 4.4)
60%
11.2 (6.8, 4.4)
63%
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
68%
8.8 (4.4, 4.4)
71%
PWM Frequency
23260 (19)
23580 (24)
23810 (24)
Screen
-10%
34%
23%
26%
3%
Brightness middle
277.3
286.5
3%
282.3
2%
266
-4%
323.6
17%
324.2
17%
Brightness
256
258
1%
269
5%
248
-3%
315
23%
304
19%
Brightness Distribution
86
82
-5%
90
5%
89
3%
91
6%
90
5%
Black Level *
0.2
0.34
-70%
0.32
-60%
0.31
-55%
0.29
-45%
0.38
-90%
Contrast
1387
843
-39%
882
-36%
858
-38%
1116
-20%
853
-39%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.25
5.57
-6%
1.17
78%
2.78
47%
3.31
37%
5.01
5%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
19.43
16.8
14%
3.29
83%
5.96
69%
5.74
70%
12.7
35%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
4.39
4.16
5%
1.06
76%
0.91
79%
2.73
38%
1.64
63%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.5
4.6
-31%
1.3
63%
3.58
-2%
2.9
17%
7.9
-126%
Gamma
2.1 105%
2.15 102%
2.2 100%
2.46 89%
2.29 96%
2.35 94%
CCT
6895 94%
7564 86%
6643 98%
7186 90%
6765 96%
8455 77%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
37.4
7%
63.8
82%
62
77%
59.7
71%
60.8
74%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55
58.9
7%
97.5
77%
96
75%
91.8
67%
95.5
74%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-7% / -9%
44% / 37%
38% / 27%
49% / 32%
29% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is narrow at just 55 percent and 35 percent of sRGB and AdobeRGB, respectively, compared to >95 percent sRGB from the Sharp LQ156M1 panel on the Alienware m15 R2. This is definitely not the panel to use for any sort of professional graphics work.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Further measurements with an X-Rite colorimeter reveal average grayscale and relatively poor color accuracy. While our calibration attempt significantly improves average grayscale (DeltaE from 3.5 to 1.7), colors are still inaccurate at higher saturation levels due to the narrow gamut of the panel.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
ColorChecker before calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration
ColorChecker after calibration

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.6 ms rise
↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (24.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.2 ms rise
↘ 13.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (39.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9381 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is about the same as the GL63 since brightness and colors haven't improved by all that much on the GL65. This is kind of a bummer because the GL65 is so much smaller than the GL63 and yet the display isn't any brighter when outdoors.

Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under sunlight
Outdoors under sunlight
Wide IPS viewing angles
Wide IPS viewing angles

Performance

The Core i7-9750H CPU and GeForce RTX 2060 GPU are high-end specifications aimed at enthusiasts. For even faster GPU options like the RTX 2070 or RTX 2080, however, MSI fans will have to turn towards the pricier GS65 series instead.

Nvidia Optimus comes standard on all SKUs to automatically exclude G-Sync. LatencyMon shows no DPC latency issues even when wireless is enabled.

Processor

The Core i7-9750H in the MSI performs above average when compared to other laptops equipped with the same processor. When running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop, for example, we're able to record an initial peak of 1279 points before dropping and stabilizing at about 1180 points to represent a dip of only 8 percent. The GS65 with the same CPU stabilizes at a slightly lower score.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-9750H for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

CineBench R15
CineBench R15
CineBench R20
CineBench R20
010203040506070809010011012013014015016017018019020021022023024025026027028029030031032033034035036037038039040041042043044045046047048049050051052053054055056057058059060061062063064065066067068069070071072073074075076077078079080081082083084085086087088089090091092093094095096097098099010001010102010301040105010601070108010901100111011201130114011501160117011801190120012101220123012401250126012701280Tooltip
MSI GL65 9SEK GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1185 (1166.86-1278.16)
MSI GL63 8RC-069US GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø824 (816.86-830.63)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1072 (986.63-1110.9)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points ∼93% +8%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
202 Points ∼93% +7%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points ∼87% +1%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
188 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=59)
183 Points ∼84% -3%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8565U
179 Points ∼82% -5%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
171 Points ∼78% -9%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points ∼76% -12%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
156 Points ∼72% -17%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
Intel Core i5-8300H
151 Points ∼69% -20%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points ∼66% -23%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK
1821 Points ∼42% +42%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points ∼39% +34%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points ∼33% +14%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H
1281 Points ∼29%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (964 - 1306, n=61)
1187 Points ∼27% -7%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H
1066 Points ∼24% -17%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H
850 Points ∼19% -34%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
Intel Core i5-8300H
823 Points ∼19% -36%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points ∼18% -37%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
733 Points ∼17% -43%
Dell Inspiron 7390 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-8565U
557 Points ∼13% -57%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
188 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1281 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
118.5 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help

System Performance

PCMark results are in the same ballpark as other high-performance laptops like the Gigabyte Aero 15 or MSI GS65 even though the GL65 is a cheaper alternative. We experienced no software issues during our time with the unit.

PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Home Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 8 Work Accelerated
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10 Standard
PCMark 10
Digital Content Creation
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7104 Points ∼59%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7090 Points ∼59% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (6641 - 8069, n=12)
7038 Points ∼59% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6888 Points ∼57% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
6690 Points ∼56% -6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
6675 Points ∼56% -6%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
4134 Points ∼34% -42%
Productivity
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
7748 Points ∼80%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
7695 Points ∼79% -1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7657 Points ∼79% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (6948 - 8106, n=12)
7491 Points ∼77% -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7434 Points ∼77% -4%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
7180 Points ∼74% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
6097 Points ∼63% -21%
Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
9472 Points ∼86% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
9431 Points ∼86%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9380 Points ∼85% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (8729 - 10056, n=12)
9357 Points ∼85% -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
9042 Points ∼82% -4%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
8791 Points ∼80% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
6449 Points ∼59% -32%
Score
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5761 Points ∼74%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points ∼74% -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
5697 Points ∼73% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5368 - 5997, n=12)
5661 Points ∼73% -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5492 Points ∼71% -5%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5374 Points ∼69% -7%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
3912 Points ∼50% -32%
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
6035 Points ∼93% +14%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5751 Points ∼88% +9%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
5706 Points ∼88% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (4450 - 5931, n=10)
5511 Points ∼85% +4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5289 Points ∼81% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
5287 Points ∼81%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
5270 Points ∼81% 0%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 9750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
4851 Points ∼80% +17%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4454 Points ∼73% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (3533 - 5185, n=10)
4391 Points ∼72% +6%
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H, 2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
4207 Points ∼69% +2%
MSI GL65 9SEK
GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
4136 Points ∼68%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
3979 Points ∼65% -4%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop), 8300H, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
3927 Points ∼64% -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4136 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5287 points
Help

Storage Devices

Internal storage options include an M.2 2280 NVMe slot and a 2.5-inch SATA III bay. The 512 GB Western Digital SN520 SSD in our test unit returns good sequential read and write rates for an NVMe drive, but pricier alternatives like the Samsung PM981 in the GS65 can be even faster as shown by the table below.

See our table of HDDs and SSDs for more benchmark comparisons.

CDM 5.5
CDM 5.5
AS SSD
AS SSD
M.2 slot sits adjacent to the 2x SODIMM slots. Note that there is space for a second M.2 slot although it is disabled
M.2 slot sits adjacent to the 2x SODIMM slots. Note that there is space for a second M.2 slot although it is disabled
Secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay for additional storage
Secondary 2.5-inch SATA III bay for additional storage
MSI GL65 9SEK
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW512G8
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Alienware m15 R2 P87F
2x Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-60%
59%
27%
-7%
33%
Copy Game MB/s
1217.53
202.59
-83%
1554.28
28%
1140.57
-6%
811.76
-33%
1426.35
17%
Copy Program MB/s
889.12
84.83
-90%
712.72
-20%
454.24
-49%
702.66
-21%
576.02
-35%
Copy ISO MB/s
1278.63
325.65
-75%
3024.87
137%
2085.95
63%
1236.22
-3%
2073.16
62%
Score Total
2485
850
-66%
4230
70%
2870
15%
1654
-33%
3633
46%
Score Write
976
230
-76%
1991
104%
1141
17%
910
-7%
1481
52%
Score Read
996
410
-59%
1490
50%
1186
19%
492
-51%
1407
41%
Access Time Write *
0.091
0.061
33%
0.036
60%
0.065
29%
0.047
48%
0.108
-19%
Access Time Read *
0.116
0.197
-70%
0.054
53%
0.042
64%
0.073
37%
0.065
44%
4K-64 Write
720.16
127.33
-82%
1729.71
140%
921.88
28%
721.96
0%
1135.27
58%
4K-64 Read
838.68
342.29
-59%
1240.56
48%
875.61
4%
322.05
-62%
1177.33
40%
4K Write
118.19
57.1
-52%
103.79
-12%
126.51
7%
95.65
-19%
108.86
-8%
4K Read
25.31
16.18
-36%
49.33
95%
59.11
134%
45.74
81%
37.2
47%
Seq Write
1378.16
456.4
-67%
1579.5
15%
923.81
-33%
920.07
-33%
2371.22
72%
Seq Read
1315.25
512.06
-61%
2004.98
52%
2516.94
91%
1238.57
-6%
1924.95
46%

* ... smaller is better

WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1744 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1454 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 534.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 482.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1340 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1412 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 43.46 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 150.2 MB/s

GPU Performance

The mobile GeForce RTX 2060 is performing where we expect it to be at within 2 percent of the average mobile RTX 2060 in our database. Keep in mind that the desktop RTX 2060 can offer 25 to 30 percent faster performance than our mobile RTX 2060 version. If you have no interest in RTX-specific features, then the mobile GTX 1660 Ti can offer very nearly the same performance as the mobile RTX 2060 for hundreds less.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
5860 Points ∼69% +83%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
4275 Points ∼50% +33%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
4265 Points ∼50% +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (3020 - 3597, n=12)
3264 Points ∼38% +2%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
3203 Points ∼38%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
10607 Points ∼72% +72%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
7754 Points ∼53% +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
7732 Points ∼53% +26%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
7266 Points ∼50% +18%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
6606 Points ∼45% +7%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
6159 Points ∼42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (5660 - 6586, n=15)
6027 Points ∼41% -2%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
5699 Points ∼39% -7%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
5689 Points ∼39% -8%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
3749 Points ∼26% -39%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
3510 Points ∼24% -43%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
2536 Points ∼17% -59%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
27319 Points ∼67% +67%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
20434 Points ∼50% +25%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
20307 Points ∼50% +24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
19338 Points ∼48% +18%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
18962 Points ∼47% +16%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
17792 Points ∼44% +9%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
16331 Points ∼40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (14768 - 17119, n=17)
15825 Points ∼39% -3%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
15343 Points ∼38% -6%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
12038 Points ∼30% -26%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
9423 Points ∼23% -42%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
7791 Points ∼19% -52%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
168006 Points ∼91% +57%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
120766 Points ∼65% +13%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
115714 Points ∼63% +8%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
107083 Points ∼58% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
107016 Points ∼58%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
103040 Points ∼56% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (55324 - 112768, n=17)
97759 Points ∼53% -9%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
88432 Points ∼48% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
82913 Points ∼45% -23%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
70414 Points ∼38% -34%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
61286 Points ∼33% -43%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
49314 Points ∼27% -54%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance Combined
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
16253 Points ∼72% +28%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
13742 Points ∼61% +8%
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
12949 Points ∼57% +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
12732 Points ∼56% 0%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
12697 Points ∼56%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
12421 Points ∼55% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (9099 - 14726, n=18)
11977 Points ∼53% -6%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
11288 Points ∼50% -11%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
10020 Points ∼44% -21%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
9140 Points ∼40% -28%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
8540 Points ∼38% -33%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
7358 Points ∼33% -42%
1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop), 9750H
37768 Points ∼74% +79%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop), 7820HK
27109 Points ∼53% +29%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop), 9980HK
26582 Points ∼52% +26%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop), 2700X
26413 Points ∼52% +25%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 9750H
24926 Points ∼49% +18%
Alienware 17 R5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop), 8750H
23414 Points ∼46% +11%
MSI GL65 9SEK
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop), 9750H
21075 Points ∼41%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop), 9750H
20784 Points ∼41% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
  (19513 - 22299, n=18)
20627 Points ∼40% -2%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
15145 Points ∼30% -28%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop), 9300H
13138 Points ∼26% -38%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop), 8750H
9466 Points ∼19% -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
18334 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34921 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
14827 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6197 points
Help

Gaming Performance

The mobile GeForce RTX 2060 is able to play any title at the native 1080p resolution. Maintaining 60 FPS on most titles is possible as well at Medium settings or higher. Even so, performance is unfortunately closer to the GTX 1660 Ti than it is to the "proper" desktop RTX 2060.

Idling on Witcher 3 shows no recurring frame dips to suggest no interrupting background activity. See our dedicated page on the mobile GeForce RTX 2060 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
109 fps ∼100% +43%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
97 fps ∼89% +28%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
90 fps ∼83% +18%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
84 fps ∼77% +11%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
76 fps ∼70%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
73 fps ∼67% -4%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
49 fps ∼45% -36%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
34 fps ∼31% -55%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
31 fps ∼28% -59%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Acer Predator Helios 700 PH717-71-785M
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
105 (min: 86) fps ∼100% +79%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Laptop)
95.3 fps ∼91% +62%
Eurocom Nightsky RX15
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
80.6 fps ∼77% +37%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GX
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
80.3 fps ∼76% +37%
Schenker XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
73 (min: 60) fps ∼70% +24%
MSI RTX 2060 Gaming Z 6G
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Desktop)
72.7 (min: 61, max: 82) fps ∼69% +24%
MSI GE75 8SF
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 (Laptop)
70.9 fps ∼68% +21%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
66.9 fps ∼64% +14%
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
65 fps ∼62% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 15 Classic-XA
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.1 fps ∼61% +9%
Alienware 17 R5
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
60.8 fps ∼58% +4%
Eurocom Nightsky Ti15
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
60.5 fps ∼58% +3%
MSI GL65 9SEK
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (Laptop)
58.7 fps ∼56%
Lenovo Legion Y540-17IRH
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
55.1 fps ∼52% -6%
Asus ROG GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps ∼46% -17%
Asus Strix GL703VM-DB74
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
39 fps ∼37% -34%
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
38.1 fps ∼36% -35%
Asus FX503VM-EH73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
37 fps ∼35% -37%
Dell XPS 15 7590 9980HK GTX 1650
Intel Core i9-9980HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
36 fps ∼34% -39%
Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Laptop)
25.8 fps ∼25% -56%
MSI GL63 8RC-069US
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Laptop)
21.9 fps ∼21% -63%
010203040506070