LG Gram 14Z90N Laptop Review: Lightweight at the Cost of Performance

Under 1 kg. Larger than a Dell XPS 13 but at least 200 grams lighter, the 14-inch LG Gram 14Z90N is one of the lightest subnotebooks you can find with a U-class Core i7 CPU. Expect some steep compromises along the way in regards to performance.

Allen Ngo 👁, 05/16/2020 🇮🇹 🇪🇸 ...

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG Gram 14Z90N (Gram Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake U

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Core: 300 MHz, Memory: 1200 MHz, DDR4, 26.20.100.7463

Memory

8192 MB

, DDR4-1866, 22-22-22-52, Single-Channel

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, LGD05B1, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Storage

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, 256 GB

Soundcard

Intel Ice Lake-U/Y PCH-LP cAVS

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 18 x 323 x 211 ( = 0.71 x 12.72 x 8.31 in)

Battery

72 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4-cell

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 1.5 W x 2, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, LG Control Cneter, Update Center, Power Manager, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

994 g ( = 35.06 oz / 2.19 pounds), Power Supply: 227 g ( = 8.01 oz / 0.5 pounds)

Price

1600 USD

Links

LG homepage
LG notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.3 %	05/2020	LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	994 g	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
81.2 %	04/2020	LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620	1.2 kg	18 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
88.9 %	03/2020	Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	1.2 kg	14.8 mm	13.40"	1920x1200
85 %	06/2019	Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620	1.2 kg	12 mm	14.00"	3840x2160
81.2 %	02/2020	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10	1.4 kg	16 mm	14.00"	1920x1080
82 %	03/2020	Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620	1.6 kg	17.9 mm	14.00"	1920x1080

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones

Case

The Gram 14Z90N uses similar lightweight metal chassis materials as the outgoing Gram 14Z980 for almost the same look and feel. The matte texture is very different from your typical magnesium-aluminum Ultrabook or carbon fiber ThinkPad as surfaces are slightly roughened on the Gram to hide fingerprints much better than you'd expect.

The biggest change from the Gram 14Z980 is to the hinges as LG has switched over to a bar hinge. One of our complaints about last year's Gram 14Z980 was its weak hinges, but it appears that LG has addressed this directly; the hinges feel stiffer this time around for stronger first impressions especially when the display is opened to wider angles.

Chassis rigidity remains a disadvantage of the Gram series. Since the Gram 14Z90N is so light, it's more susceptible to warping and creaking and this is especially true of the display. This isn't to say that the chassis is weak or poorly built, but it definitely doesn't feel as sound or unyielding as say the Dell XPS 13, HP Spectre 13, Asus ZenBook S13, or the Razer Blade Stealth.

LG Gram 14T90N LG Gram 14Z90N Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 ❌

Connectivity

Port options are nearly identical to the last generation Gram 14Z980 but with some key differences. Firstly, the two USB Type-A ports are now 3.1 instead of 3.0. Secondly, the single USB Type-C port now supports Thunderbolt 3 for a wider variety of compatible monitors and docking stations. And lastly, port positioning has changed slightly. It's great seeing so many options here especially since most other Ultrabooks have been leaning towards USB Type-C with nothing else.

Right: MicroSD reader, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB 3.1 Type-A, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, USB 3.1 Type-A, HDMI, USB Type-C + Thunderbolt 3

SD Card Reader

LG hasn't touched or upgraded the spring-loaded MicroSD reader at all. Moving 1 GB worth if images from our UHS-II card to desktop still takes about 13 seconds compared to almost half that on the XPS 13 card reader.

Fully inserted MicroSD card protrudes slightly for easier ejecting

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	146.3 MB/s ∼100% +83%
LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	80 MB/s ∼55%
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	73.14 MB/s ∼50% -9%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	72.7 MB/s ∼50% -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.4 MB/s ∼18% -67%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	187.3 MB/s ∼100% +113%
LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	88 MB/s ∼47%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	85.91 MB/s ∼46% -2%
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	81.63 MB/s ∼44% -7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	37.1 MB/s ∼20% -58%

Communication

A non-removable Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 compatibility as opposed to the slower Intel 8265 on the older Gram 14Z980. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1645 (1401^min - 1773^max) MBit/s ∼100% +36%
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1563 (1461^min - 1779^max) MBit/s ∼95% +29%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1213 (1070^min - 1354^max) MBit/s ∼74%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	906 MBit/s ∼55% -25%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	505 MBit/s ∼31% -58%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1460 MBit/s ∼100% +5%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1397 (1247^min - 1509^max) MBit/s ∼96%
Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1282 (1203^min - 1358^max) MBit/s ∼88% -8%
Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1242 (1133^min - 1283^max) MBit/s ∼85% -11%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	655 MBit/s ∼45% -53%

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1397 (1247-1509)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1213 (1070-1354)

Webcam

ColorChecker LG Gram 14Z90N: 7.83 ∆E min: 3.34 - max: 14.3 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/LG-Gram-14Z90N-Laptop-Review-Lightweight-at-the-Cost-of-Performance.465540.0.html">LG Gram 14Z90N</a> — LG Gram 14Z90N

Maintenance

Much like on previous Gram systems, the bottom panel of the Gram 14Z90N is difficult to remove even with the proper tools. All screws are hidden underneath covers and the tight rubber footing to make end-user upgrades a pain. According to a disassembly guide here, however, users will have the same upgrade options as on the Gram 14T90N convertible since both systems share similar components. Note that 8 GB of single-channel RAM comes soldered with the ability to support up to 24 GB via an open SODIMM slot.

Users have access to two M.2 bays and a single SODIMM slot (Image source: https://www.mobile01.com/)

Accessories and Warranty

LG throws in a handy USB to RJ-45 adapter in the retail box. The usual one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies.

Input Devices

Keyboard

LG hasn't changed the keyboard layout or key sizes at all when compared to the Gram 14Z980. Key feedback, however, feels firmer and more satisfying here than on the Gram 14Z90N. Clatter is subsequently louder, but that's a fair trade-off especially since the Gram series caters well to on-the-go typists. All letters and symbols are lit when the white backlight is activated.

The small Arrow keys continue to be one of the worst aspects of the keyboard as they're far too spongy and uncomfortable to use.

Touchpad

The clickpad remains identical in size to the one on its predecessor (10.5 x 7 cm). Unlike most other clickpads, however, the surface here is completely smooth and not roughened at all. The finger tends to stick and jump when gliding at slow to slow-medium speeds as a result.

Meanwhile, the integrated click keys have an audible click when pressed even though feedback is on the soft side. It's a decent clickpad after growing accustomed to its plasticky surface and somewhat spongy key feedback.

Same layout as last year's model. The Power button doubles as a fingerprint reader

Touchpad cursor control tends to stick or jump when gliding a finger at slow speeds

Firmer key feedback than most other Ultrabooks

Small Arrow keys are still cramped and spongy

Display

Unlike most other laptop manufacturers who have to source their panels from elsewhere, LG has the advantage of using their own in-house panels. Our Gram 14Z90N uses the same LP140WF7-SPG1 IPS panel as found on last year's Gram 14Z980 and so both models share very similar display characteristics including contrast ratio, response times, gamut, and brightness. This time, however, the panel appears to be better calibrated out of the box than before as shown by the table below.

All SKUs come with glossy displays for sharper texts and images. Though "only" 1080p, the screen could almost pass as a 4K display because of how sharp onscreen content looks.

Glossy panel with no matte or 4K UHD options

Unlike most other Ultrabooks, the LG uses no Gorilla Glass in order to keep weight down. Thus, the lid is not very rigid

Slight backlight bleeding along the bottom edge and top corners


301.4 cd/m²	301.7 cd/m²	305 cd/m²
299.4 cd/m²	316.8 cd/m²	296.8 cd/m²
281.2 cd/m²	299 cd/m²	281.2 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 316.8 cd/m² Average: 298.1 cd/m² Minimum: 22.56 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 316.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 960:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
95.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.47% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.03% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	LG Gram 14Z90N LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080	Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.40, 1920x1200	Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL B140ZAN01.3, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160	Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080
Display		0%	-1%	3%	21%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	65.03	65.04 0%	64.65 -1%	66.3 2%	87.53 35%	66.7 3%
sRGB Coverage	95.47	95.71 0%	94.35 -1%	97.26 2%	99.66 4%	92.26 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.12	66.67 1%	65.96 0%	68.47 4%	81.1 23%	67.48 2%
Response Times		-24%	3%	-20%	-27%	11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)	54 ?(28.8, 25.2) -34%	36.8 ?(19.6, 17.2) 9%	50 ?(22, 28) -24%	57.2 ?(30, 27.2) -42%	36 ?(19, 17) 11%
Response Time Black / White *	28.8 ?(18, 10.8)	32.8 ?(19.6, 13.2) -14%	30 ?(18.4, 11.6) -4%	33.2 ?(16, 17.2) -15%	32 ?(17.2, 14.8) -11%	26 ?(15, 11) 10%
PWM Frequency				2500 ?(25)		44 ?(20)
Screen		-10%	-26%	2%	-26%	-72%
Brightness middle	316.8	322.2 2%	333.8 5%	607.6 92%	594.5 88%	253 -20%
Brightness	298	301 1%	307 3%	595 100%	536 80%	245 -18%
Brightness Distribution	89	86 -3%	83 -7%	96 8%	83 -7%	78 -12%
Black Level *	0.33	0.25 24%	0.4 -21%	0.4 -21%	0.43 -30%	0.225 32%
Contrast	960	1289 34%	835 -13%	1519 58%	1383 44%	1124 17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	1.74	3.62 -108%	3.54 -103%	3.23 -86%	4.87 -180%	8.89 -411%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	5.41	6.9 -28%	5.8 -7%	8.67 -60%	7.9 -46%	4.56 16%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *	1.37	1.22 11%	2.36 -72%	1.01 26%	2.83 -107%	4.9 -258%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	2.7	3.9 -44%	4.7 -74%	5.5 -104%	6.7 -148%	6.33 -134%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.43 ^91%	2.14 ^103%	2.12 ^104%	2.091 ^105%	2.52 ^87%
CCT	6655 ^98%	6344 ^102%	6261 ^104%	6413 ^101%	6891 ^94%	6745 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61.3	61.3 0%	61.2 0%	63 3%	72 17%	60 -2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	95.4	95.6 0%	94.7 -1%	97.5 2%	100 5%	91 -5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-11% / -10%	-8% / -18%	-5% / -1%	-11% / -17%	-20% / -48%

* ... smaller is better

Color space is the same as last year's model at approximately 95 percent and 61 percent of sRGB and AdobeRGB, respectively, which is comparable to most high-end subnotebooks currently available. In fact, no Gram laptop we've tested thus far offer anything greater. Users will have to look at 15.6-inch laptops from other OEMs like the Asus ZenBook Pro 15 or Dell XPS 15 for wider coverage of AdobeRGB.

Gram laptops are generally well calibrated and the Gram 14Z90N is no exception. Measurements with our X-Rite colorimeter show excellent grayscale and colors with average DeltaE values of just 2.7 and 1.74, respectively. Calibrating the panel even further ourselves would improve both just marginally. If we are to nitpick, the color blue appears to be less accurate than the other tested colors.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 20.8 ms rise
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Display brightness hasn't changed from the last generation model which is a shame because the panel is almost half as bright as some subnotebooks like the MacBook Pro 13, XPS 13, or the Lenovo IdeaPad S940. The mandatory glossy display further exacerbates the need for a brighter backlight to improve outdoor visibility and reduce glare. Viewing angles are otherwise excellent with only minimal shifts in colors and contrast.

Performance

Much like every other Gram laptop thus far, the Gram 14 comes with an Intel U-class CPU and no dedicated GeForce option in order to keep weight as low as possible. It would have been nice to see AMD Ryzen U options especially since these LG laptops are very pricey to begin with.

Processor

CPU performance is disappointing at approximately 18 to 31 percent slower than the average Core i7-1065G7 in our database. In fact, results are so disappointing that even the much older 8th gen Core i5-8250U is able to offer comparable CPU performance to our 10th gen Core i7 part. The weak performance is explored further in our Stress Test section below.

Running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop shows a performance drop of about 10 percent overtime from an already low initial score of 495 points.

See our dedicated page on the Core i7-1065G7 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø453 (446.17-494.8)

LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø462 (454.02-529.49)

LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø480 (467.78-544.81)

Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø636 (559.86-812.55)

Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø512 (499.03-642.87)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	1883 Points ∼100% +74%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	1645 Points ∼87% +52%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	1533 Points ∼81% +42%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=29)	1528 Points ∼81% +41%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	1507 Points ∼80% +39%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	1507 Points ∼80% +39%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	1506 Points ∼80% +39%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	1350 Points ∼72% +25%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	1181 Points ∼63% +9%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	1117 Points ∼59% +3%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	1097 Points ∼58% +1%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	1081 Points ∼57%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	458 Points ∼100% +28%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	444 Points ∼97% +24%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=29)	441 Points ∼96% +23%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	425 Points ∼93% +19%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	399 Points ∼87% +11%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	380 Points ∼83% +6%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	366 Points ∼80% +2%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	358 Points ∼78%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	351 Points ∼77% -2%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	322 Points ∼70% -10%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	322 Points ∼70% -10%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	750 Points ∼100% +52%
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	683 Points ∼91% +38%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	675 (643.4^min - 674.64^max) Points ∼90% +36%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	674 (644.06^min - 673.71^max) Points ∼90% +36%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	667 Points ∼89% +35%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	659 Points ∼88% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=34)	652 Points ∼87% +32%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	642 Points ∼86% +30%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	622 Points ∼83% +26%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	564 Points ∼75% +14%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	530 (445.08^min - 507.45^max) Points ∼71% +7%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	513 (528.77^min - 559.75^max) Points ∼68% +4%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	495 (446.17^min - 494.8^max) Points ∼66%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 Intel Core i7-8565U	181 Points ∼100% +9%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Core i7-1065G7	180 Points ∼99% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=33)	175 Points ∼97% +5%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	170 Points ∼94% +2%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	166 Points ∼92% 0%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	166 Points ∼92%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	162 Points ∼90% -2%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	152 Points ∼84% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	146 Points ∼81% -12%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	144 Points ∼80% -13%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	143 Points ∼79% -14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	133 Points ∼73% -20%

Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	1023 Seconds * ∼100%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	990 Seconds * ∼97% +3%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	942.3 Seconds * ∼92% +8%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	892 Seconds * ∼87% +13%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=21)	881 Seconds * ∼86% +14%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	815 Seconds * ∼80% +20%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	766 Seconds * ∼75% +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	703 Seconds * ∼69% +31%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	694 Seconds * ∼68% +32%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	694 Seconds * ∼68% +32%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	4608 MIPS ∼100% +11%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	4530 MIPS ∼98% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3948 - 4589, n=22)	4340 MIPS ∼94% +4%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	4166 MIPS ∼90%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	4087 MIPS ∼89% -2%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	4029 MIPS ∼87% -3%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	3726 MIPS ∼81% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	3638 MIPS ∼79% -13%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	3553 MIPS ∼77% -15%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	3553 MIPS ∼77% -15%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	18535 MIPS ∼100% +38%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	17467 MIPS ∼94% +30%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=22)	17337 MIPS ∼94% +29%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	17035 MIPS ∼92% +27%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	17035 MIPS ∼92% +27%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	16931 MIPS ∼91% +26%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	16713 MIPS ∼90% +24%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	15128 MIPS ∼82% +13%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	15003 MIPS ∼81% +12%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	13432 MIPS ∼72%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (882 - 1348, n=17)	1264 Points ∼100% +33%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	1253 Points ∼99% +32%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	1229 Points ∼97% +30%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	948 Points ∼75%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	902 Points ∼71% -5%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	902 Points ∼71% -5%

Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	4372 Points ∼100% +77%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=17)	4256 Points ∼97% +73%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	3628 Points ∼83% +47%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	3234 Points ∼74% +31%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	3234 Points ∼74% +31%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	2464 Points ∼56%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=20)	4.61 fps ∼100% +26%
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA Intel Core i5-8265U	4.6 fps ∼100% +25%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	4.27 fps ∼93% +16%
MSI Modern 14 A10RB Intel Core i7-10710U	4.2 fps ∼91% +14%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	4.04 fps ∼88% +10%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	4.04 fps ∼88% +10%
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API AMD Ryzen 7 3700U	3.9 fps ∼85% +6%
Dell Latitude 13 3390 Intel Core i5-8250U	3.89 fps ∼84% +6%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	3.8 fps ∼82% +4%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	3.67 fps ∼80%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	61.5 s * ∼100%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	61 s * ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=17)	59.7 s * ∼97% +3%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Core i7-1065G7	0.761 sec * ∼100%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	0.734 sec * ∼96% +4%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Ryzen 5 3500U	0.734 sec * ∼96% +4%
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD Intel Core i5-1035G1	0.722 sec * ∼95% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=16)	0.702 sec * ∼92% +8%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel Core i7-10510U	0.689 sec * ∼91% +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

495 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

42.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

166 Points

Help

... in comparison

System Performance

PCMark 10 scores are consistently below the average Core i7-1065G7 laptop in our database by a few percentage points likely due to the system's combination of slow processor performance and single-channel RAM. Results are still ever-so-slight better than the LG Gram 14T90N with the Comet Lake-U CPU since the Iris Plus G7 GPU is much faster than the UHD Graphics 620.

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3878 - 4679, n=18)	4378 Points ∼50% +3%
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	4231 Points ∼48%
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	4167 Points ∼47% -2%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	4154 Points ∼47% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3870 Points ∼44% -9%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	3851 Points ∼44% -9%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3463 Points ∼39% -18%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3445 Points ∼39% -19%
Essentials
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	9253 Points ∼80% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (8302 - 9902, n=18)	9190 Points ∼80% +4%
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	8866 Points ∼77%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	8763 Points ∼76% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8390 Points ∼73% -5%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	7685 Points ∼67% -13%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	7132 Points ∼62% -20%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	7083 Points ∼62% -20%
Productivity
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	7280 Points ∼65% +3%
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	7057 Points ∼63%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6674 Points ∼60% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (5518 - 7379, n=18)	6665 Points ∼60% -6%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	5823 Points ∼52% -17%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	5759 Points ∼52% -18%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	5749 Points ∼52% -19%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	5727 Points ∼51% -19%
Digital Content Creation
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	3856 Points ∼25% +17%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3260 - 4307, n=18)	3732 Points ∼24% +14%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	3466 Points ∼22% +6%
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3285 Points ∼21%
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	2916 Points ∼19% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	2810 Points ∼18% -14%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	2751 Points ∼18% -16%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	2735 Points ∼18% -17%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	3825 Points ∼61% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3305 - 4275, n=17)	3734 Points ∼59% +10%
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	3646 Points ∼58% +7%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	3604 Points ∼57% +6%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3478 Points ∼55% +2%
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	3402 Points ∼54%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	3218 Points ∼51% -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3147 Points ∼50% -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	5153 Points ∼73% 0%
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	5141 Points ∼72%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	5039 Points ∼71% -2%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A	4842 Points ∼68% -6%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	4520 Points ∼64% -12%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4339 Points ∼61% -16%
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2460 - 5291, n=17)	4309 Points ∼61% -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4209 Points ∼59% -18%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3402 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5141 points
PCMark 10 Score		4231 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening five browser tabs on Notebookcheck.net. 4K UHD playback on our YouTube test video is otherwise smooth with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	2562.3 μs * ∼100%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our system comes equipped with a 256 GB Samsung PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ NVMe SSD with the option to install a second M.2 drive. Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if the second slot supports NVMe or if it's SATA only. Higher capacities are available from LG up to 512 GB.

Running DiskSpd Read in a loop 50 times shows increasing performance over time likely due to automatic caching. Thus, users won't need to worry about reaching any thermal limitations of the SSD in real-world day-to-day loads.

More SSD and HDD benchmarks can be found on our table here.

	LG Gram 14Z90N Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ	LG Gram 14T90N Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ	LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF	Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD	Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
AS SSD		20%	-56%	-25%	19%
Seq Read	1743.8	1828.87 5%	476.13 -73%	1956.28 12%	2624.79 51%
Seq Write	1450.19	2048.14 41%	487.41 -66%	1227 -15%	1359.68 -6%
4K Read	57.37	54.21 -6%	30.57 -47%	62.96 10%	47.71 -17%
4K Write	140.92	120.48 -15%	66.14 -53%	156.61 11%	115.49 -18%
4K-64 Read	906.58	1511.94 67%	352.87 -61%	475.64 -48%	1491.67 65%
4K-64 Write	1372.47	1573.42 15%	263.12 -81%	539.02 -61%	1154.39 -16%
Access Time Read *	0.059	0.046 22%	0.092 -56%	0.042 29%	0.045 24%
Access Time Write *	0.081	0.091 -12%	0.055 32%	0.105 -30%	0.032 60%
Score Read	1138	1749 54%	431 -62%	734 -36%	1802 58%
Score Write	1658	1899 15%	378 -77%	818 -51%	1406 -15%
Score Total	3380	4560 35%	1040 -69%	1915 -43%	4069 20%
Copy ISO MB/s	1519.52	1891.18 24%	513.76 -66%	1021.51 -33%
Copy Program MB/s	538.82	569.17 6%	259.33 -52%	302.84 -44%
Copy Game MB/s	1069.66	1424.73 33%	520.7 -51%	491.4 -54%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		11%	-67%	0%	-8%
Write 4K	183.6	181.4 -1%	74.66 -59%	186.8 2%	105.3 -43%
Read 4K	48.51	52.5 8%	14.89 -69%	71.45 47%	40.9 -16%
Write Seq	1520	1592 5%	502 -67%	1203 -21%	1914 26%
Read Seq	1914	1617 -16%	498.6 -74%	2600 36%	2224 16%
Write 4K Q32T1	528.9	555.8 5%	214.3 -59%	514.1 -3%	419.3 -21%
Read 4K Q32T1	559.8	539.1 -4%	225.5 -60%	570.4 2%	288.1 -49%
Write Seq Q32T1	1540	2955 92%	504.8 -67%	785.7 -49%	1954 27%
Read Seq Q32T1	3408	3270 -4%	559.8 -84%	2947 -14%	3382 -1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		16% / 17%	-62% / -60%	-13% / -16%	6% / 8%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3408 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1540 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 559.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 528.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1914 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1520 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.51 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 183.6 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

: Ø2787 (2420.1-3216.68)

GPU Performance

Much like the disappointing CPU performance, the integrated Iris Plus G7 GPU also performs well below average. 3DMark scores are approximately 28 to 50 percent slower than the average Iris Plus G7 in our database. Even so, raw performance is still much better than the generations old UHD Graphics 620 as found on all other LG Gram laptops thus far. 3D gaming isn't recommended unless if you are satisfied with the lowest settings and resolutions possible.

See our dedicated page on the Iris Plus G7 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	824 Points ∼4% +55%
HP 14-dk0008ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	779 Points ∼4% +46%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (526 - 851, n=21)	745 Points ∼4% +40%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	533 Points ∼3%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	375 Points ∼2% -30%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U	348 Points ∼2% -35%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	18850 Points ∼9% +168%
HP 14-dk0008ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	18378 Points ∼9% +161%
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	17803 Points ∼9% +153%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	16553 Points ∼8% +135%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	16048 Points ∼8% +128%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (7024 - 18881, n=23)	15426 Points ∼8% +119%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	9643 Points ∼5% +37%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	9347 Points ∼5% +33%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U	7963 Points ∼4% +13%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	7067 Points ∼3% 0%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	7045 Points ∼3%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	2950 Points ∼6% +98%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	2740 Points ∼5% +84%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1418 - 3156, n=24)	2600 Points ∼5% +75%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	2598 Points ∼5% +75%
HP 14-dk0008ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	2581 Points ∼5% +74%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	2272 Points ∼4% +53%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	1487 Points ∼3%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	1245 Points ∼2% -16%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1194 Points ∼2% -20%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	1155 Points ∼2% -22%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U	968 Points ∼2% -35%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	4508 Points ∼7% +43%
HP 14-dk0008ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	4056 Points ∼7% +29%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=26)	4019 Points ∼7% +28%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	3908 Points ∼6% +24%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	3483 Points ∼6% +11%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	3389 Points ∼6% +8%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	3150 Points ∼5%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	1787 Points ∼3% -43%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1757 Points ∼3% -44%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	1738 Points ∼3% -45%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U	1680 Points ∼3% -47%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	4086 Points ∼17% +160%
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	3538 Points ∼15% +125%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1319 - 4163, n=26)	3200 Points ∼13% +104%
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), R5 3500U	2801 Points ∼12% +78%
HP 14-dk0008ng AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	2698 Points ∼11% +72%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 3700U	2447 Points ∼10% +56%
Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U	1679 Points ∼7% +7%
LG Gram 14T90N Intel UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U	1579 Points ∼7% +1%
LG Gram 14Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7	1571 Points ∼6%
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1548 Points ∼6% -1%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U	1175 Points ∼5% -25%

3DMark 11 Performance		3050 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6971 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1363 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		602 points
Help

... in comparison