Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarLG Gram 14Z90N Laptop Review: Lightweight at the Cost of Performance
Announced late last year, the 2020 LG Gram 14Z90N directly succeeds the 2019 Gram 14Z980 by refreshing the chassis design while updating the processor options. The Gram family prioritizes weight above all else and so it consists of some of the lightest Ultrabooks you can find from the 13.3-inch Gram 13Z980 all the way up to 17.3-inch Gram 17Z990. Thus, you'd be hard-pressed to find another Core U-class 14-inch Ultrabook as light as our Gram 14Z90N.
LG has only a few configurable options for the Gram 14Z90N as all SKUs come with a glossy FHD display and a Core i7-1065G7 Ice Lake-U CPU at the time of writing. RAM and SSD capacities may be different depending on the retailer. The 14-inch system competes directly with other Ultrabooks and subnotebooks like the Lenovo IdeaPad S940, Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13.5, Asus ZenBook 14, or the smaller Dell XPS 13 and HP Spectre 13.
More LG reviews:
- LG Gram 14T90N (Convertible version of the Gram 14Z90N)
- LG Gram 17Z990
- LG Gram 14Z980
- LG Gram 15Z980
- LG K50s
- LG G8X ThinQ
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85.3 % | 05/2020 | LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 994 g | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.2 % | 04/2020 | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.9 % | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 85 % | 06/2019 | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 12 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
| 81.2 % | 02/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82 % | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Case
The Gram 14Z90N uses similar lightweight metal chassis materials as the outgoing Gram 14Z980 for almost the same look and feel. The matte texture is very different from your typical magnesium-aluminum Ultrabook or carbon fiber ThinkPad as surfaces are slightly roughened on the Gram to hide fingerprints much better than you'd expect.
The biggest change from the Gram 14Z980 is to the hinges as LG has switched over to a bar hinge. One of our complaints about last year's Gram 14Z980 was its weak hinges, but it appears that LG has addressed this directly; the hinges feel stiffer this time around for stronger first impressions especially when the display is opened to wider angles.
Chassis rigidity remains a disadvantage of the Gram series. Since the Gram 14Z90N is so light, it's more susceptible to warping and creaking and this is especially true of the display. This isn't to say that the chassis is weak or poorly built, but it definitely doesn't feel as sound or unyielding as say the Dell XPS 13, HP Spectre 13, Asus ZenBook S13, or the Razer Blade Stealth.
True to its name, the defining feature of the Gram 14Z90N is its weight of just under 1 kg to be several hundred grams lighter than most other Ultrabooks. Even the latest Dell XPS 13 weighs noticeably more despite it offering a smaller 13.3-inch screen. LG has made the system slightly thinner than last year's Gram 14Z980 without changing the footprint of the system.
Connectivity
Port options are nearly identical to the last generation Gram 14Z980 but with some key differences. Firstly, the two USB Type-A ports are now 3.1 instead of 3.0. Secondly, the single USB Type-C port now supports Thunderbolt 3 for a wider variety of compatible monitors and docking stations. And lastly, port positioning has changed slightly. It's great seeing so many options here especially since most other Ultrabooks have been leaning towards USB Type-C with nothing else.
SD Card Reader
LG hasn't touched or upgraded the spring-loaded MicroSD reader at all. Moving 1 GB worth if images from our UHS-II card to desktop still takes about 13 seconds compared to almost half that on the XPS 13 card reader.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Communication
A non-removable Intel AX201 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 compatibility as opposed to the slower Intel 8265 on the older Gram 14Z980. We experienced no issues when connected to our Netgear RAX200 test router.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
| iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A514-52 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401IV | |
| LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 | |
Webcam
Maintenance
Much like on previous Gram systems, the bottom panel of the Gram 14Z90N is difficult to remove even with the proper tools. All screws are hidden underneath covers and the tight rubber footing to make end-user upgrades a pain. According to a disassembly guide here, however, users will have the same upgrade options as on the Gram 14T90N convertible since both systems share similar components. Note that 8 GB of single-channel RAM comes soldered with the ability to support up to 24 GB via an open SODIMM slot.
Accessories and Warranty
LG throws in a handy USB to RJ-45 adapter in the retail box. The usual one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies.
Input Devices
Keyboard
LG hasn't changed the keyboard layout or key sizes at all when compared to the Gram 14Z980. Key feedback, however, feels firmer and more satisfying here than on the Gram 14Z90N. Clatter is subsequently louder, but that's a fair trade-off especially since the Gram series caters well to on-the-go typists. All letters and symbols are lit when the white backlight is activated.
The small Arrow keys continue to be one of the worst aspects of the keyboard as they're far too spongy and uncomfortable to use.
Touchpad
The clickpad remains identical in size to the one on its predecessor (10.5 x 7 cm). Unlike most other clickpads, however, the surface here is completely smooth and not roughened at all. The finger tends to stick and jump when gliding at slow to slow-medium speeds as a result.
Meanwhile, the integrated click keys have an audible click when pressed even though feedback is on the soft side. It's a decent clickpad after growing accustomed to its plasticky surface and somewhat spongy key feedback.
Display
Unlike most other laptop manufacturers who have to source their panels from elsewhere, LG has the advantage of using their own in-house panels. Our Gram 14Z90N uses the same LP140WF7-SPG1 IPS panel as found on last year's Gram 14Z980 and so both models share very similar display characteristics including contrast ratio, response times, gamut, and brightness. This time, however, the panel appears to be better calibrated out of the box than before as shown by the table below.
All SKUs come with glossy displays for sharper texts and images. Though "only" 1080p, the screen could almost pass as a 4K display because of how sharp onscreen content looks.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 316.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 960:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
95.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| LG Gram 14Z90N LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.40, 1920x1200 | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL B140ZAN01.3, IPS, 14.00, 3840x2160 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 14.00, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -0% | 3% | 21% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 65 0% | 64.7 0% | 66.3 2% | 87.5 35% | 66.7 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 95.5 | 95.7 0% | 94.3 -1% | 97.3 2% | 99.7 4% | 92.3 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.1 | 66.7 1% | 66 0% | 68.5 4% | 81.1 23% | 67.5 2% |
| Response Times | -24% | 3% | -20% | -27% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.4 ? | 54 ? -34% | 36.8 ? 9% | 50 ? -24% | 57.2 ? -42% | 36 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 32.8 ? -14% | 30 ? -4% | 33.2 ? -15% | 32 ? -11% | 26 ? 10% |
| PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 44 ? | ||||
| Screen | -10% | -26% | 2% | -26% | -72% | |
| Brightness middle | 316.8 | 322.2 2% | 333.8 5% | 607.6 92% | 594.5 88% | 253 -20% |
| Brightness | 298 | 301 1% | 307 3% | 595 100% | 536 80% | 245 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 86 -3% | 83 -7% | 96 8% | 83 -7% | 78 -12% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.25 24% | 0.4 -21% | 0.4 -21% | 0.43 -30% | 0.225 32% |
| Contrast | 960 | 1289 34% | 835 -13% | 1519 58% | 1383 44% | 1124 17% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.74 | 3.62 -108% | 3.54 -103% | 3.23 -86% | 4.87 -180% | 8.89 -411% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.41 | 6.9 -28% | 5.8 -7% | 8.67 -60% | 7.9 -46% | 4.56 16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.37 | 1.22 11% | 2.36 -72% | 1.01 26% | 2.83 -107% | 4.9 -258% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 3.9 -44% | 4.7 -74% | 5.5 -104% | 6.7 -148% | 6.33 -134% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.43 91% | 2.14 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.091 105% | 2.52 87% |
| CCT | 6655 98% | 6344 102% | 6261 104% | 6413 101% | 6891 94% | 6745 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.3 | 61.3 0% | 61.2 0% | 63 3% | 72 17% | 60 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.4 | 95.6 0% | 94.7 -1% | 97.5 2% | 100 5% | 91 -5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-10% | -8% /
-18% | -5% /
-1% | -11% /
-17% | -20% /
-48% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space is the same as last year's model at approximately 95 percent and 61 percent of sRGB and AdobeRGB, respectively, which is comparable to most high-end subnotebooks currently available. In fact, no Gram laptop we've tested thus far offer anything greater. Users will have to look at 15.6-inch laptops from other OEMs like the Asus ZenBook Pro 15 or Dell XPS 15 for wider coverage of AdobeRGB.
Gram laptops are generally well calibrated and the Gram 14Z90N is no exception. Measurements with our X-Rite colorimeter show excellent grayscale and colors with average DeltaE values of just 2.7 and 1.74, respectively. Calibrating the panel even further ourselves would improve both just marginally. If we are to nitpick, the color blue appears to be less accurate than the other tested colors.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Display brightness hasn't changed from the last generation model which is a shame because the panel is almost half as bright as some subnotebooks like the MacBook Pro 13, XPS 13, or the Lenovo IdeaPad S940. The mandatory glossy display further exacerbates the need for a brighter backlight to improve outdoor visibility and reduce glare. Viewing angles are otherwise excellent with only minimal shifts in colors and contrast.
Performance
Much like every other Gram laptop thus far, the Gram 14 comes with an Intel U-class CPU and no dedicated GeForce option in order to keep weight as low as possible. It would have been nice to see AMD Ryzen U options especially since these LG laptops are very pricey to begin with.
Processor
CPU performance is disappointing at approximately 18 to 31 percent slower than the average Core i7-1065G7 in our database. In fact, results are so disappointing that even the much older 8th gen Core i5-8250U is able to offer comparable CPU performance to our 10th gen Core i7 part. The weak performance is explored further in our Stress Test section below.
Running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread in a loop shows a performance drop of about 10 percent overtime from an already low initial score of 495 points.
See our dedicated page on the Core i7-1065G7 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
| LG Gram 14T90N | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
| LG Gram 14T90N | |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark 10 scores are consistently below the average Core i7-1065G7 laptop in our database by a few percentage points likely due to the system's combination of slow processor performance and single-channel RAM. Results are still ever-so-slight better than the LG Gram 14T90N with the Comet Lake-U CPU since the Iris Plus G7 GPU is much faster than the UHD Graphics 620.
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3402 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5141 points | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4231 points | |
Help | ||
DPC Latency
LatencyMon shows DPC latency issues when opening five browser tabs on Notebookcheck.net. 4K UHD playback on our YouTube test video is otherwise smooth with no dropped frames.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| LG Gram 14Z90N | |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our system comes equipped with a 256 GB Samsung PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ NVMe SSD with the option to install a second M.2 drive. Unfortunately, we cannot confirm if the second slot supports NVMe or if it's SATA only. Higher capacities are available from LG up to 512 GB.
Running DiskSpd Read in a loop 50 times shows increasing performance over time likely due to automatic caching. Thus, users won't need to worry about reaching any thermal limitations of the SSD in real-world day-to-day loads.
More SSD and HDD benchmarks can be found on our table here.
| LG Gram 14Z90N Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | LG Gram 14T90N Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 20% | -56% | -25% | 19% | |
| Seq Read | 1744 | 1829 5% | 476.1 -73% | 1956 12% | 2625 51% |
| Seq Write | 1450 | 2048 41% | 487.4 -66% | 1227 -15% | 1360 -6% |
| 4K Read | 57.4 | 54.2 -6% | 30.57 -47% | 63 10% | 47.71 -17% |
| 4K Write | 140.9 | 120.5 -14% | 66.1 -53% | 156.6 11% | 115.5 -18% |
| 4K-64 Read | 907 | 1512 67% | 352.9 -61% | 475.6 -48% | 1492 64% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1372 | 1573 15% | 263.1 -81% | 539 -61% | 1154 -16% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.059 | 0.046 22% | 0.092 -56% | 0.042 29% | 0.045 24% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.081 | 0.091 -12% | 0.055 32% | 0.105 -30% | 0.032 60% |
| Score Read | 1138 | 1749 54% | 431 -62% | 734 -36% | 1802 58% |
| Score Write | 1658 | 1899 15% | 378 -77% | 818 -51% | 1406 -15% |
| Score Total | 3380 | 4560 35% | 1040 -69% | 1915 -43% | 4069 20% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1520 | 1891 24% | 514 -66% | 1022 -33% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 539 | 569 6% | 259.3 -52% | 302.8 -44% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 1070 | 1425 33% | 521 -51% | 491.4 -54% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 11% | -67% | 0% | -8% | |
| Write 4K | 183.6 | 181.4 -1% | 74.7 -59% | 186.8 2% | 105.3 -43% |
| Read 4K | 48.51 | 52.5 8% | 14.89 -69% | 71.4 47% | 40.9 -16% |
| Write Seq | 1520 | 1592 5% | 502 -67% | 1203 -21% | 1914 26% |
| Read Seq | 1914 | 1617 -16% | 498.6 -74% | 2600 36% | 2224 16% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 529 | 556 5% | 214.3 -59% | 514 -3% | 419.3 -21% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 560 | 539 -4% | 225.5 -60% | 570 2% | 288.1 -49% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1540 | 2955 92% | 505 -67% | 786 -49% | 1954 27% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3408 | 3270 -4% | 560 -84% | 2947 -14% | 3382 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
17% | -62% /
-60% | -13% /
-16% | 6% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Much like the disappointing CPU performance, the integrated Iris Plus G7 GPU also performs well below average. 3DMark scores are approximately 28 to 50 percent slower than the average Iris Plus G7 in our database. Even so, raw performance is still much better than the generations old UHD Graphics 620 as found on all other LG Gram laptops thus far. 3D gaming isn't recommended unless if you are satisfied with the lowest settings and resolutions possible.
See our dedicated page on the Iris Plus G7 for more technical information and benchmark comparisons.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3050 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6971 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1363 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 602 points | |
Help | ||