LG Gram 16 (2022) Laptop review: Lightweight device with stability issues

At 1300 Euros, the model we tested (16Z900) certainly isn't the cheapest deal you'll find in the office segment. The device is equipped with a Core i7-1260P from Intel's Alder Lake generation, 16 GB of soldered DDR5 RAM (5200 MHz) and a 1-TB NVMe SSD in M.2 format. Images are displayed on a 16-inch 16:10 IPS screen with 1560 x 1600 pixels which supposedly covers just under 100% of the P3 color space (unlike the 15-inch model we tested recently). The operating system is Windows 11 Home 64 Bit.
The LG Gram 16's competitors (most of them heavier) include other 16-inch notebooks equipped with a Core i7-1260P, such as the Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 and the Dell Inspiron 16 7620, although these devices are actually convertibles/2-in-1 notebooks. We have also included the Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 with a Core i5-1240P in the comparison. This device's iGPU only has 80 instead of 96 EUs.
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | LG Gram 16Z90Q i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.7 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2.1 kg | 18.41 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.9 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
Case
With the exception of a few minor details (shape of the camera, key labeling), the case looks exactly the same as last year's version. According to LG, it is made of a magnesium alloy, which sounds great on paper. In practice, we were not particularly impressed by the material. It feels and sounds more like plastic to us, and – and this is the bigger issue – isn't very rigid and stable. Particularly the center of the base unit is very sensitive to pressure and the display cover warps easily. The laptop would probably have benefited from slightly thicker (which also means heavier) materials.
No device can compete with the Gram 16's low weight. At 1.2 kg, it is very easy to carry around with you. Competitors weigh quite a lot more at around 2.0 kg, although this also makes them more stable. We are very pleased with the 16-inch device's looks. Thanks to its narrow bezels and elegant yet discreet design (the Grams are available in white, gray, or black, depending on the model), the notebook will look good in any scenario. The workmanship is satisfactory and the hinges do a good job, although the lid tends to slip quite quickly when subjected to vibrations.
Connectivity
Port selection
The port selection is similar to that of the old Gram 16. While the left side harbors an HDMI port (with no further specifications), an audio jack, and two modern USB 4 ports with support for Tunderbolt 4, DisplayPort and Power Delivery, the right side features a microSD card reader, a Kensington lock and two classic USB A ports (3.2 Gen2). All ports are positioned towards the back of the device, which gives users plenty of space when working with an external mouse. Unlike other Grams, the device does not come equipped with a USB-to-LAN adapter.
SD Card Reader
The card reader's performance is average. It reaches a speed of 87 MB/s during sequential reading and 76 MB/s when transferring photos with our reference SD card. These results are very similar to those of the Lenovo Yoga 7.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Communication
The new Gram sets itself apart from its predecessor in terms of Wi-Fi speed. LG has upgraded this device from an Intel Wi-FI AX201 to a Wi-Fi AX 211. At a distance of 1 m to our current reference router (Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000), the 16-inch laptop achieved approx. 1600 Mbit/s when sending and receiving. This is an excellent result.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=247) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=247) | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1003 - 1501, n=4) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1178 - 1623, n=4) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=216) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=216) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
Webcam
Although the webcam has a slightly higher resolution (Full HD) and more accurate colors than most office notebooks, you mustn't expect too much from the Gram 16's webcam.

Accessories
Apart from a nicely light and compact 65-watt USB C power adapter, the device only comes with a few brochures.
Maintenance
Any maintenance work on the Gram 16 would be rather complicated, as all screws are hidden beneath rubber covers. Because we received our test unit from an online shop rather than from the manufacturer, we chose not to open the chassis.
Warranty
The device has a 24-month warranty.
Input Devices
Keyboard
With the exception of the meager stability, the keyboard made a good impression on us. While the layout (small one-row enter key on the German version, tiny arrow keys, three-column number pad, ...) and feedback/typing aren't perfect, we believe most buyers should be perfectly happy with the keyboard. As would be expected, the device features white backlighting with two levels of brightness.
Touchpad
The touchpad is gratifyingly large at 13 x 8 cm. The relatively smooth surface ensures good gliding properties, and precision and gesture-support are satisfactory. The clickable bottom section is comfortable to use, but rattles somewhat, which impacts perceived quality.
Display
Although the new screen has a lower contrast ratio (1144:1 instead of 1505:1) because of the slightly higher black value (0.32 instead of 0.22 cd/²), we were much happier with the matte screen than with the predecessor's reflective panel.
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 366 cd/m²
Contrast: 1144:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 2.69
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.971
LG Gram 16Z90Q LG LP160WQ1-SPB2 (LGD06EB), IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 Lenovo LEN160WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 BOE NV16N45, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 B160UAN01.K, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -18% | -18% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 96.8 | 95.8 -1% | 67 -31% | 67 -31% | 80.1 -17% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.8 0% | 95.7 -4% | 95.9 -4% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.6 | 83.8 -1% | 69.3 -18% | 69.3 -18% | 80.5 -5% |
Response Times | 1% | -3% | 12% | 28% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.7 ? | 44 ? 4% | 36 ? 21% | 32 ? 30% | 27 ? 41% |
Response Time Black / White * | 19.7 ? | 20 ? -2% | 24.8 ? -26% | 20.8 ? -6% | 17 ? 14% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -39% | 9% | -32% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 366 | 331 -10% | 393.7 8% | 320.7 -12% | 404 10% |
Brightness | 347 | 309 -11% | 367 6% | 309 -11% | 391 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 84 -6% | 90 1% | 80 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.22 31% | 0.38 -19% | 0.36 -13% | 0.29 9% |
Contrast | 1144 | 1505 32% | 1036 -9% | 891 -22% | 1393 22% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.82 | 4.64 -65% | 1.97 30% | 4.18 -48% | 3.9 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.65 | 9.82 -111% | 5.46 -17% | 8.48 -82% | 8.5 -83% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.69 | 3.16 -17% | 0.62 77% | 0.77 71% | 1.7 37% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 6.9 -200% | 2.1 9% | 6.3 -174% | 5.4 -135% |
Gamma | 1.971 112% | 2.34 94% | 2.1 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6796 96% | 7904 82% | 6461 101% | 6258 104% | 6242 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75.1 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-25% | -4% /
2% | -13% /
-23% | 1% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
The luminosity is slightly higher by 40 cd/m² (347 instead of 309 cd/m²), which makes the Gram 16 easier to work with in bright surroundings, especially when working outdoors (although there remains plenty of room for improvement). Color accuracy has also improved compared to the previous year's model. Even ex-works, the Delta 2000 value is within the ideal range below 3.
No improvements were made in terms of response rates (they remain mediocre) and color space coverage. The latter was already very good last year, with almost 100% coverage of the sRGB/P3 color space and 85% coverage of AdobeRGB. The viewing angles are what you would expect from an IPS display.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
45.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.5 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8627 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
The Gram 16's performance is mid-range for office notebooks. The 16 GB of RAM and 1-TB SSD should suffice for most users for the coming year.
Testing conditions
Processor
The Core i7-1260P is home to four performance cores that support hyperthreading and eight efficiency cores without hyperthreading. This means that the chip can work a total of 16 threads in parallel. The Gram 16 doesn't do particularly well during the Cinebench loop, which measures performance over an extended period of time. First, because its performance starts to drop significantly from the second round, and second, because the results fluctuate greatly throughout the test. This is not a particularly good sign for cooling or energy management. The cooling mode "high" (see graph) avoids this problem but also makes the device noticeably louder.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Office | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2176 - 10898, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102371, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (11015 - 56906, n=26) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (669 - 2709, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (42571 - 82493, n=26) | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=86, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (2901 - 6975, n=26) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54846, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (5950 - 26376, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (16041 - 92356, n=26) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (259 - 771, n=26) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12869, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (1237 - 5858, n=26) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (13261 - 43652, n=26) | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
System Performance
Despite the fluctuating CPU, the system benchmark results are fairly good. The device reached 5251 points in the PCMark 10, which puts it in second place in our comparison field.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (4796 - 6068, n=17) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (9260 - 11251, n=17) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=78, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6167 - 8629, n=17) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5231 - 6908, n=17) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1484 - 1811, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1486 - 1755, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1451 - 1872, n=16) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1253 - 1807, n=16) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=82, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 5251 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (25125 - 71544, n=25) | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (24983 - 72065, n=25) | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (23512 - 66799, n=25) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 185.2, n=85, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1260P (77.9 - 118.4, n=21) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 16Z90Q | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7 16IAP7 | |
Dell Inspiron 16 7620 2-in-1 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The SSD suffers a similar fate to the processor: Its speed begins to fluctuate noticeably after a while. In short bursts, the Gram 16's Samsung drive achieves good performance with over 4700 MB/s (sequential reading) and 2800 MB/s (sequential writing) in the AS SSD benchmark.
* ... smaller is better