LG Gram 16 16T90P Convertible Review: Lighter Than Most 15.6-inch Laptops

LG announced two 16-inch Gram laptops at CES 2021: the Gram 16 clamshell and the Gram 16 convertible each powered by the latest Intel 11th gen Tiger Lake-U CPUs. The unit we'll be looking at today is the Gram 16 convertible which is notable for being one of the first 16:10 2-in-1 laptops in its size class. The system doesn't come cheap at around $1600+ USD retail despite its lack of any discrete graphics options.
Direct competitors are few and far between at the moment. Thus, we'll be comparing the Gram 16 2-in-1 to flagship more well-known 15.6-inch convertibles instead like the Dell XPS 15 2-in-1, HP Spectre x360 15, Asus ZenBook 15 Flip, or the Lenovo Yoga C940 15.
More LG reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
Details here
potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.8 % | 04/2021 | LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.1 % | 03/2021 | Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U i5-10210U, GeForce MX350 | 1.7 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
89.7 % | 12/2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | 2 kg | 16.2 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
86.8 % | 05/2020 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1200 | |
85 % | 01/2020 | HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 2.1 kg | 19.3 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
87 % | 12/2020 | Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | 2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 |
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
Case
The metal chassis looks good, but it's a couple of steps down from the similarly priced HP Spectre or Dell XPS. The base, for example, is more susceptible to twisting and creaking while the lid flexes more easily. The two hinges in particular are probably the weakest aspect of the otherwise sleek chassis because they do a poor job at preventing the lid from teetering in laptop mode. First impressions are therefore excellent from a distance and just average when switching between modes.
The LG is much lighter than most 15.6-inch laptops or convertibles despite its larger 16-inch screen size. The Spectre x360 15, for example, is well over half a kilogram heavier. Overall dimensions are very similar to the MacBook Pro 16 albeit a hair thicker.
Connectivity
Port options are decent for a 16-inch form factor. To make the most of the system, however, owners will have to invest in USB-C adapters or docking stations. Keep in mind that the USB-A port along the right edge is covered by a flap which can be difficult to open up without first lifting the whole laptop.
External graphics is supported via Thunderbolt 4 to turn the Gram 16 into a powerhouse should users decide to go down that route.
SD Card Reader
Transfer rates from the spring-loaded MicroSD card reader are similar to the card readers on previous Gram laptops to suggest that LG has made no changes or improvements here. For such an expensive laptop, we were hoping for faster speeds like on the XPS 15 or XPS 13 where MicroSD card transfer rates are two to three times faster.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
Communication
Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.1 are provided by a soldered Intel AX201 module. We experienced no connectivity issues when paired to our Netgear RAX200 test router.
Webcam

Maintenance
Like all Gram laptops before it, the Gram 16 2-in-1 is not easily serviceable. The screws on the bottom are covered beneath stickers and glued rubber feet to dissuade user upgrades. This is a shame because the system comes with two M.2 2280 slots that owners could have easily exploited for additional storage.
The United States FCC has several images of the laptop motherboard available to the public.
Accessories and Warranty
Input Devices
Keyboard
The keys here have crisper feedback than the Dell XPS 15, Razer Blade 15, Asus ZenBook 15, and many other Ultrabooks for that matter to be more comfortable for typing. Travel also feels deeper than expected despite how thin and light the chassis is. Clatter is loud as a consequence of the firm feedback.
Touchpad
The clickpad is reasonably large (13.2 x 8.3 cm) with smooth traction and just a bit of friction to avoid feeling slippery. Meanwhile, its integrated click keys are shallow and with moderate feedback, but clatter is louder than expected. It's a reliable and pain-free trackpad so long as users aren't bothered by the audible click when pressing down.
Display
Every Gram laptop we've tested thus far has had an amazing display and the Gram 16 2-in-1 is no different. Its 16-inch 16:10 touchscreen here is uncommon since most other laptops tend to be 15- or 17-inches with either 16:9 or 3:2 aspect ratios. Naturally, LG is the manufacturer for its own LP160WQ1-SPA1 IPS panel which can be found on no other laptop in our database at the moment to make the Gram 16 even more unique.
Though display quality is excellent, maximum brightness could have been brighter. The Gram 16 2-in-1 is much dimmer than the displays on the MacBook Pro 16 or XPS 15 by up to 2x which is disappointing for such a travel-friendly design.
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 325.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 929:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.91 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 2.83
ΔE Greyscale 7.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
75.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
84.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 16.00, 2560x1600 | Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U Chi Mei N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 16.10, 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 16.00, 3072x1920 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 15.60, 1920x1200 | HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 BOE0866, IPS, 15.60, 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -7% | -18% | -15% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 96.3 | 67 -30% | 81.5 -15% | 68.3 -29% | 68.8 -29% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.3 -1% | 100 0% | 94.3 -6% | 99.5 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.7 | 69.2 -18% | 79.6 -6% | 68.4 -19% | 70.1 -17% | |
Response Times | 11% | -37% | -11% | -54% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.4 ? | 35.2 ? 3% | 52.4 ? -44% | 42 ? -15% | 56.8 ? -56% | 34 ? 7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.8 ? | 22 ? 18% | 34.9 ? -30% | 28.8 ? -7% | 40.8 ? -52% | 24 ? 10% |
PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 131700 | ||||
Screen | 33% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 325.3 | 339 4% | 519 60% | 592 82% | 284.6 -13% | 402 24% |
Brightness | 311 | 317 2% | 477 53% | 565 82% | 285 -8% | 375 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 86 -7% | 86 -7% | 85 -8% | 85 -8% | 84 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.25 29% | 0.39 -11% | 0.46 -31% | 0.25 29% | 0.35 -0% |
Contrast | 929 | 1356 46% | 1331 43% | 1287 39% | 1138 22% | 1149 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.91 | 0.9 82% | 2.28 54% | 3.19 35% | 3.52 28% | 2.47 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.96 | 2.92 73% | 6.54 40% | 5.45 50% | 5.56 49% | 4.32 61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.83 | 0.74 74% | 0.86 70% | 2.03 28% | 3 -6% | 2.36 17% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.7 | 2 74% | 0.9 88% | 3.9 49% | 3.2 58% | 2.26 71% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.238 98% | 2145 0% | 2.25 98% | 2.28 96% | 2.49 88% |
CCT | 8272 79% | 6631 98% | 6572 99% | 6522 100% | 7070 92% | 6285 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75.8 | 69 -9% | 78 3% | 71.6 -6% | 61.1 -19% | 99 31% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.8 | 92 -8% | 100 0% | 93.8 -6% | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
21% | 1% /
27% | 4% /
17% | -20% /
-2% | 8% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Color space covers all of sRGB and 76 percent of AdobeRGB. Its volume, however, reaches beyond the AdobeRGB standard to signify a DCI-P3 target instead not unlike the Gram 16 clamshell. It's therefore very likely that LG is using the exact same IPS panel for both its Gram 16 clamshell and 2-in-1 models. This would also make the Gram 16 series one of the very few 16-inch laptops to offer DCI-P3 coverage with the MacBook Pro 16 being the most well known.
X-Rite colorimeter measurements show an overly cool color temperature out of the box and color accuracy subsequently suffers at lower saturation levels. Our calibration attempt brings down the color temperature to improve grayscale significantly.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (34.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 54 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18993 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Outdoor visibility isn't as good as we had hoped. Generally, we believe that convertible laptops should have brighter displays than clamshells as owners would be more likely to use convertible laptops outdoors or on-the-go. The display on the LG Gram 16 2-in-1 isn't significantly brighter than the display on the Gram 15 clamshell which is disappointing to see. Glare is almost unavoidable as shown by the pictures below.
Performance
Like other Gram laptops in its family, the Gram 16 2-in-1 relies only on a Core U-series CPU to keep overall weight and thickness to a minimum. The 11th gen Core i7-1165G7 is a huge upgrade over both 10th gen Ice Lake and 8th gen Whiskey Lake-U in terms of graphics performance which is what the older Gram laptops were sorely lacking. There are still no AMD options, however, likely to keep production costs under control.
It's highly recommended that owners become familiar with the pre-installed LG Control Center, Update, and Reader Mode applications as their in-app settings directly influence the user experience. Control Center in particular is important as the Silent, Optimal, and Performance power profile settings are toggled here. Our system was set to Performance mode prior to running any performance benchmarks below. Annoyingly, the power profile automatically resets to Optimal mode each and every time the PC restarts.
Processor
While single-thread performance is excellent, multi-thread performance is a mixed bag with results that are generally lower than the average Core i7-1165G7 laptop in our database. CineBench R15 xT, for example, is roughly 20 percent slower than expected due to the system's very short Turbo Boost potential. The Dell Inspiron 15 7506 2-in-1 and Asus VivoBook 15 each with the same Core i7-1165G7 CPU are able to consistently maintain faster CPU clock rates than our Gram convertible when under the same stressful benchmark conditions.
Despite the somewhat underwhelming processor performance, overall performance is still an upgrade over existing Gram laptops running on Ice Lake or older CPUs by wide margins.
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.2 - 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (3769 - 5686, n=17) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U | |
HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV | |
Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV | |
Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2431 - 3221, n=15) |
PCMark 10 Score | 4988 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Asus ZenBook UX535-M01440 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Honor MagicBook Pro 10210U Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | HP Spectre X360 15-5ZV31AV Intel SSD 660p 2TB SSDPEKNW020T8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 12% | 5% | -90% | -17% | |
Seq Read | 3012 | 2654 -12% | 2531 -16% | 1423 -53% | 1220 -59% |
Seq Write | 1603 | 802 -50% | 2289 43% | 766 -52% | 1152 -28% |
4K Read | 49.25 | 42.15 -14% | 15.85 -68% | 42.21 -14% | 52.3 6% |
4K Write | 147.8 | 118.2 -20% | 39.88 -73% | 74.8 -49% | 146.6 -1% |
4K-64 Read | 911 | 1411 55% | 1267 39% | 973 7% | 652 -28% |
4K-64 Write | 702 | 1344 91% | 1749 149% | 218.8 -69% | 847 21% |
Access Time Read * | 0.051 | 0.075 -47% | 0.122 -139% | 0.125 -145% | 0.077 -51% |
Access Time Write * | 0.07 | 0.035 50% | 0.095 -36% | 0.552 -689% | 0.106 -51% |
Score Read | 1261 | 1718 36% | 1536 22% | 1157 -8% | 826 -34% |
Score Write | 1010 | 1542 53% | 2018 100% | 370 -63% | 1109 10% |
Score Total | 2856 | 4048 42% | 4317 51% | 2094 -27% | 2371 -17% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1891 | 1961 4% | 1995 5% | 1151 -39% | 2070 9% |
Copy Program MB/s | 595 | 480.5 -19% | 584 -2% | 499.4 -16% | 571 -4% |
Copy Game MB/s | 1282 | 1191 -7% | 1135 -11% | 733 -43% | 1219 -5% |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -21% | -23% | -37% | -23% | |
Write 4K | 202.4 | 162 -20% | 55.5 -73% | 93.3 -54% | 151.5 -25% |
Read 4K | 45.48 | 46.52 2% | 16.21 -64% | 45.9 1% | 59.3 30% |
Write Seq | 2136 | 1638 -23% | 1959 -8% | 1211 -43% | 1424 -33% |
Read Seq | 1843 | 1922 4% | 1763 -4% | 1633 -11% | 1609 -13% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 681 | 410.3 -40% | 398.5 -41% | 273.1 -60% | 393.6 -42% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 754 | 493.5 -35% | 648 -14% | 356 -53% | 369.4 -51% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2149 | 1085 -50% | 2727 27% | 1198 -44% | 1946 -9% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3473 | 3212 -8% | 3242 -7% | 2269 -35% | 1934 -44% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-0% | -9% /
-5% | -64% /
-71% | -20% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
Graphics performance is where we expect it to be relative to other laptops with the same Iris Xe GPU. They are especially improved over the underwhelming Iris Plus Graphics G7 that we experienced on last year's Gram 15. Nonetheless, performance in games may not be very steady. Simply idling on Witcher 3, for example, would see frame rates fluctuate between 53 and 57 FPS as shown by the graph below.
3DMark 11 Performance | 7002 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18285 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4937 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1786 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (14.9 - 56.5, n=156) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-56-511A | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.5 - 28, n=152) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7506 2-in-1 Black Edition | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.15 - 27.8, n=145) | |
LG Gram 16 2-in-1 16T90P |