Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
Average of 5 scores (from 7 reviews)
Reviews for the Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7
The new aluminum metal chassis feels classier, stronger, smoother, and longer-lasting than the Alcantara versions that Microsoft have been shoving down our throats since the original Surface Laptop. If Microsoft could throw in some additional ports, then they might actually have a winner here.
Source: India Today
The Surface Laptop 3 with its design, hardware, and overall performance, doesn't attempt to do anything special. In fact, there's no attempt to even do so. What it does instead provides an extremely refined experience on a device that looks and feels as premium as anything else available in the market right now.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/07/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Laptop Media
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 (13.5″)’s display (Sharp LQ135P1JX51 (SHP 14B3)) is touch-sensitive, has a very high resolution, and naturally for an IPS panel – comfortable viewing angles and good contrast ratio. Additionally, it has decent maximum brightness (400+ nits), adequate default settings and comfortable backlight in terms of PWM. Although all of that speaks well of the panel, there is something that represents it even better – the color accuracy. By default, the display is pretty color accurate, however, when you apply our Gaming and Web design profile, the Average dE drops to just 0.8, which makes it one of the most color-accurate displays we’ve had in our office.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/20/2020
Source: Heute DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/11/2020
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN
Positive: Beautiful display; elegant design; solid workmanship; high autonomy; silent keyboard. Negative: Very high price; few ports; mediocre frames.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/14/2020
Source: Tweakers NL→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 08/05/2020
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2020
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 90%
Source: Alt om Data DA→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/06/2020
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 50% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU): Integrated graphics card in Intel Ice-Lake G7 SoCs based on the new Gen. 11 architecture with 64 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Cluster). The clock rate depends on the processor model ranging from 300 MHz base to 1050 - 1100 MHz boost. The Ice-Lake chips are produced in the modern 10nm process at Intel produced.
With these GPUs you are able to play modern and demanding games fluently at medium detail settings and HD resolution.
i5-1035G7: Ice-Lake based low power quad core processor for thin and light laptops. Integrated four Sunnycove cores clocked at 1.2 - 3.7 GHz that support Hyperthreading (8 threads). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a relatively fast Iris Plus G7 graphics card and Wifi 6 / Thunderbolt partly integrated. The chip is manufactured in the modern 10nm process at Intel.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Above all, this display size is used for subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles. For all three types, this size is quite large. The biggest variety of subnotebooks is represented with this size.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.
Microsoft smartphones and tablets have been tested since 2012. There are many reviews with average ratings. The reader's interest is quite given, but the market share is not big enough for the Top 5 smartphone manufacturers (as of 2016).
78.8%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.