Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

Open-world hit with compromises: Crimson Desert in review

A world of unlimited possibilities.

Few games on Steam are generating as much buzz right now as Crimson Desert. Our benchmark check shows whether this massive action RPG aims too high or delivers a surprisingly smooth experience.
Florian Glaser, Ninh Duy (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
Gaming Laptop Desktop Gamecheck

Technology, settings & benchmark

After our hands-on session, we can say that Crimson Desert, from the relatively unknown studio Pearl Abyss, has several clear strengths, but also its share of weaknesses. On the plus side, the standout features are the gigantic game world—assuming you enjoy open worlds—and, above all, the successful combat system. The latter proves to be highly dynamic, fast-paced, and stylishly presented. The title also scores points outside of combat with its attractive animations.

We were less impressed by the mouse-and-keyboard controls, which require some time to get used to. While the controls are not a complete failure, in many areas they do not feel fully thought through, as they sometimes seem overloaded and not especially intuitive, with some odd key bindings as well. In our view, the developers went a bit too far with the number of features and gameplay mechanics, resulting in an unnecessarily high level of complexity.

Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert
Crimson Desert

Technically, the game makes a fairly good impression so soon after release, provided you can overlook minor issues such as somewhat long load times and pop-in affecting objects and characters. At medium settings or higher, the engine renders very attractive landscapes as well as settlements and towns. Thanks in no small part to the dense vegetation—which at times moves a bit too quickly—and the many effects, the game world comes across as extremely detailed and lively. Overall, the title reminded us of a mix of Kingdom Come Deliverance and Dragon's Dogma, with various other influences and borrowed elements mixed in as well, although the end result still feels very distinct.

Video Options
Video Options
Graphics Options
Graphics Options

The game also deserves credit for its extensive graphics menu, which is split across two tabs. The Video options allow you to change not only the resolution, but also upscaling, among other settings. While Crimson Desert does not support XeSS, it does include FSR 3.1 as well as DLSS 4.0 and DLSS 4.5. As expected from a current game, the title also supports Frame Generation. Ray Reconstruction can also be enabled if desired, resulting in even more attractive and believable lighting (see the screenshots below).

Ray tracing, which is found in the Graphics options, is enabled starting with the Medium preset. Speaking of presets, the developers have included six of them, ranging from Minimum to Cinematic. Anyone who prefers to fine-tune the quality settings manually can also do so in the Graphics menu. One practical feature is the built-in VRAM indicator, which helps estimate video memory requirements. Changes to the settings do not require a restart.

Cinematic Preset with Ray Reconstruction
Cinematic Preset with Ray Reconstruction
Cinematic Preset
High preset
Medium preset
Minimum preset

Our benchmark sequence begins after the tutorial fight in the dark forest, once you reach the open world (save point: New Journey; area: Hernandian Territory or Hernand Town). As shown in the video, we follow a set route with the main character for just under 40 seconds. Performance is recorded using the CapFrameX tool.

Results

FHD / 1,920 x 1,080

Given the level of visual quality on offer, the system requirements are justified and more than reasonable. With a current mid-range GPU on the level of the GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, even maximum settings are playable smoothly at 1,920 x 1,080 pixels.

Crimson Desert
    1920x1080 Minimum Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Cinematic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
202 (92.9min, 137.2P0.1, 159.8P1) fps ∼100%
149.5 (39min, 112.7P0.1, 129.5P1) fps ∼100%
146.9 (100.9min, 111.6P0.1, 123.2P1) fps ∼100%
127.6 (59.3min, 104.5P0.1, 109.6P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
130.4 (57.1min, 72.1P0.1, 91.7P1) fps ∼65%
109 (30.5min, 70.1P0.1, 83.5P1) fps ∼73%
106.1 (65.5min, 71.1P0.1, 81P1) fps ∼72%
94.2 (57.1min, 62.1P0.1, 69.5P1) fps ∼74%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
144.2 (78.9min, 93.1P0.1, 112.4P1) fps ∼71%
107.1 (49.9min, 75.9P0.1, 85.4P1) fps ∼72%
103.8 (51.7min, 65.9P0.1, 75.8P1) fps ∼71%
90.6 (55.8min, 61.2P0.1, 65.7P1) fps ∼71%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
116.7 (42.8min, 76P0.1, 93.1P1) fps ∼58%
68.9 (52.4min, 53.4P0.1, 56.4P1) fps ∼46%
67.3 (49.1min, 51.3P0.1, 54.9P1) fps ∼46%
55.9 (29.9min, 29.9P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼44%

QHD / 2,560 x 1,440 (+ upscaling)

At 2,560 x 1,440 with the Cinematic preset, a mobile RTX 5060 still clears the 40 fps mark.

Crimson Desert
    2560x1440 Cinematic Preset     2560x1440 Cinematic Preset + DLSS Balanced
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
99.1 (63.4min, 83.8P0.1, 87P1) fps ∼100%
122.3 (53.2min, 100.5P0.1, 105P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
79.4 (49.5min, 53.3P0.1, 57.5P1) fps ∼80%
92.2 (44.2min, 53.8P0.1, 66.9P1) fps ∼75%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
67.9 (45.9min, 47P0.1, 52P1) fps ∼69%
85.4 (52.1min, 56.5P0.1, 64P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
42 (29.6min, 29.9P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼42%
51.5 (29.7min, 29.9P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼42%

UHD / 3,840 x 2,160 (+ upscaling)

As with the recently tested Death Stranding 2, a high-end chip is only necessary for 4K if upscaling is not used. At 3,840 x 2,160 with maximum details, the game is already quite playable on a GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop. The results with DLSS enabled - in our case, using the Balanced preset - can be found in the table.

Crimson Desert
    3840x2160 Cinematic Preset     3840x2160 Cinematic Preset + DLSS Balanced
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, i9-13900K
Desktop-PC Asus ROG Strix Z790-F
59.1 (50.6min, 50.9P0.1, 51.9P1) fps ∼100%
80.4 (54.4min, 68.6P0.1, 71.2P1) fps ∼100%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Neo 16 E25
50.9 (41.6min, 42.8P0.1, 44.3P1) fps ∼86%
65.7 (39.6min, 52.1P0.1, 57.5P1) fps ∼82%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
Tuxedo Stellaris 16
42.1 (34.6min, 35.4P0.1, 36.7P1) fps ∼71%
55.4 (33.7min, 48.2P0.1, 49.2P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX
XMG Fusion 16 M25
23.2 (18.8min, 19.2P0.1, 19.9P1) fps ∼39%
33.7 (28.2min, 28.5P0.1, 30P1) fps ∼42%

(Multi) Frame Generation

Frame Generation was, of course, tested as well. Using Nvidia’s current top notebook GPU, the RTX 5090 Laptop, as an example, even MFGx2 already delivers a noticeable performance boost. With MFGx4, the frame rate is nearly three times higher than with DLSS alone.

3.840 x 2,160, Cinematic Preset DLSS Balanced DLSS Balanced + MFGx2 DLSS Balanced + MFGx4
GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop 66 fps (1 % low: 46 fps) 105 fps (1 % low: 36 fps) 177 fps (1 % low: 33 fps)
GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop 55 fps (1 % low: 40 fps) 88 fps (1 % low: 35 fps) 145 fps (1 % low: 32 fps)

Verdict - Ambitious Mega-ARPG

Even if Crimson Desert is certainly not a perfect game—its controls are a case in point—the ambitious title runs surprisingly well so soon after release. It also often looks stunning thanks to its enormous draw distance and high level of detail, especially since the game world feels very lively.

Test systems

XMG Neo 16 E25 (RTX 5090 Laptop)
XMG Neo 16 E25 (RTX 5090 Laptop)
Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 (RTX 5080 Laptop)
Tuxedo Stellaris 16 Gen7 (RTX 5080 Laptop)
XMG Fusion 16 M25 (RTX 5060 Laptop)
XMG Fusion 16 M25 (RTX 5060 Laptop)

Overview

Because gaming benchmarks are very time-consuming and are sometimes delayed by activation restrictions, we can only present a limited number of results at the time of publication. Additional GPU results will follow.

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Crimson Desert
 Crimson Desert (2026)
low
1920x1080
Minimum Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Cinematic Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Cinematic Preset
4K
3840x2160
Cinematic Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
202
149.5
146.9
127.6
99.1
59.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop
144.2
107.1
103.8
90.6
67.9
42.1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
116.7
68.9
67.3
55.9
42
23.2
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

No comments for this article

Got questions or something to add to our article? Even without registering you can post in the comments!
No comments for this article / reply

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Open-world hit with compromises: Crimson Desert in review
Florian Glaser, 2026-03-26 (Update: 2026-03-26)