Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED laptop review: Successful performance of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Our test sample of the VivoBook S 14 with the model designation M5406WA can currently be found for just over US$1,200 online and for this price, you get the latest Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 24 GB of (unfortunately soldered on) fast LPDDR5X-7500 RAM and a 1,000-GB NVMe SSD. Displaying content is taken care of by a shiny OLED screen with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 pixels and the much-loved 16:10 aspect ratio. This total package is rounded out by Windows 11 Home as an operating system.
Competitors to the VivoBook include other 14-inch laptops from 2024 such as the Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 (Core Ultra 7 155H) and the Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Ryzen 7 8845HS), as well as the Asus Zenbook 14 UM3406HA (Ryzen 7 8840HS). All of these candidates can be found in the tables below as comparison devices.
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.9 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.7 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | 1.5 kg | 12.9 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.5 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
88.1 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.6 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA R7 8840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 |
Please note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here.
Case
As with most Asus laptops, the VivoBook S 14 looks pretty sleek overall. Its silver surfaces attract comparatively less dirt than devices with a black finish. While its lid is made from metal, the base unit has been constructed using plastic. Its build quality gives us no reason to complain.
Similar to many other (slim) laptops, only its stability could do with being a little better—be it the torsional rigidity of the lid or how the base unit behaves when pressure is applied (especially in the touchpad area). It gains plus points for its generous opening angle of 180°. The hinge does a fine job (you can open the laptop with one hand), although vibrations are only absorbed to a limited extent and result in the screen wobbling a little.
Weighing in at 1.3 kg, the 14-inch device is nice and lightweight and can be transported easily. Among the comparison devices, only the Zenbook 14 weighs even less (1.2 kg). At 1.59 cm, its build height is average.
Connectivity
Ports
The laptop's connectivity options are generally good. Although it doesn't feature an RJ45 port, everything else is on board that you would expect to see on a current all-round laptop. This includes an HDMI 2.1 port, two USB-C ports with DisplayPort support and Power Delivery (1x 4.0, 1x 3.2 Gen 1), a microSD card reader, and a 3.5-mm jack on the left-hand side. On the right, there are only two USB-A ports that comply with the 3.2 Gen 1 standard.
As most of the connections are situated on the back half of the case, you can use a mouse with no problems or limitations.
SD card reader
The installed card reader is unfortunately on the slower side. Its 40 MB/s are considerably surpassed by the IdeaPad Pro 5 and the Zenbook S16 from the same manufacturer.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=14, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Communication
The integrated MediaTek chip's (Wi-Fi 6E MT7922) WLAN performance was a mixed bag during our test. While its receiving performance was on par with the competition, its sending performance was rather disappointing in our test (1-meter distance to the reference router).
Webcam
The device is fitted with a pretty standard 2-MP webcam, meaning its picture sharpness and color accuracy aren't the best. A positive, on the other hand, is that it comes with a mechanical privacy shutter.
Accessories
The laptop comes with a compact 90-watt power supply and a few information leaflets.
Maintenance
Asus could do with making it a little easier to perform maintenance on this device. One of the 11 case screws (Torx) is hidden beneath a cover that is rather difficult to remove. Apart from this, the bottom case cover can be removed quite easily from its anchoring. We have a few negatives to note about the inside of the case: Firstly, the RAM and WLAN module are soldered on and secondly, there is only a single M.2 slot.
Sustainability
Asus primarily relies on cardboard when it comes to the laptop's packaging. It is protected by a fabric insert and a fabric bag (each labeled). A plastic film is only used for the power supply unit. We were unable to find any information on the device's CO2 footprint and the case's recycling status.
Warranty
In the United States, the laptop is covered by a standard 12-month warranty.
Input devices
Keyboard
Overall, the keyboard is pretty good. Although some layout decisions may be a little questionable (no separate power button, tiny directional arrows, ...)—but this is the case on most laptops—and the feedback could do with being a little more crisp in our eyes, it works just fine apart from this. Asus has given its VivoBook S 14 one-zone RGB backlighting that can be adjusted in several levels. Special functions are triggered by default without pressing the Fn key, which can be changed if required.
Touchpad
The manufacturer has come up with some nice features for the laptop's touchpad. For example, you can conveniently adjust the volume with a swipe gesture on the left-hand side, while the right-hand side is used to control the display brightness. The surprisingly large clickpad for a 14-inch laptop (approx. 13 x 8.5 cm) also feels nice and smooth during use. The click areas provide decent feedback but also sound a little rattly when triggered.
Display
OLED fans who aren't annoyed by reflective surfaces will be completely happy with the VivoBook S 14. The HDR-ready 14-inch panel achieves great contrasts thanks to its OLED-typical low black value.
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 385 cd/m²
Contrast: 12833:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.99 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 1.79
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.204
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 ATNA60CL10-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -4% | 1% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -2% | 99.9 0% | 98.6 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.2 | 95.6 -2% | 86.9 -11% | 98.9 2% | 87.3 -10% |
Response Times | 68% | -1812% | 32% | 33% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.3 ? | 0.56 ? 57% | 34.1 ? -2523% | 0.61 ? 53% | 1.31 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.2 ? | 0.65 ? 46% | 14.4 ? -1100% | 0.67 ? 44% | 1.2 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 480 100% | 240 ? 0% | 480 ? 100% | |
Screen | 35% | -118% | -31% | 36% | |
Brightness middle | 385 | 407 6% | 464 21% | 411 7% | 387 1% |
Brightness | 382 | 405 6% | 456 19% | 414 8% | 386 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 90 -5% | 99 4% | 98 3% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.02 33% | 0.36 -1100% | 0.01 67% | |
Contrast | 12833 | 20350 59% | 1289 -90% | 38700 202% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.99 | 0.6 70% | 0.9 55% | 2.8 -41% | 1 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.69 | 1.2 67% | 2.32 37% | 5.5 -49% | 2.4 35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.79 | 0.35 80% | 2.2 -23% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 0.5 37% | 1.4 -75% | 1.8 -125% | 1.4 -75% |
Gamma | 2.204 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.218 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6474 100% | 6453 101% | 6669 97% | 6319 103% | 6466 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
34% | -645% /
-335% | 1% /
-9% | 22% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
Moreover, it's great that the panel covers the DCI-P3 and AdobeRGB spaces almost completely. We also have nothing negative to say about its color accuracy, response times or viewing angles.
Meanwhile, its brightness is only just sufficient. Although an average of 382 cd/m² (SDR mode) is roughly in line with most competitors, those who spend a lot of time in brighter rooms or outdoors will quickly wish for a higher brightness (500 cd/m² upwards) due to the many reflections that occur.
In addition, buyers have to live with the display flickering that is typical when it comes to OLED panels—at least below a brightness of 86 %. 240 to 480 Hz (depending on the level) may cause problems for sensitive people.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise | |
↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz | ≤ 86 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 86 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17348 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance
The version of the VivoBook S 14 we are testing can be classed as a mid-range device. Alternative models fitted with the Core Ultra 5, for example, can be found for a slightly lower price. In addition, there is a completely foldable version on offer called the S 14 Flip.
Testing conditions
You can select between four different operation modes using the preinstalled MyAsus app. As the profiles performance and full speed result in the device getting uncomfortably loud under load and barely result in any improved performance, we performed all of our measurements using the standard mode which is already active in the laptop's delivered state.
Cyberpunk 2077 (FHD/Ultra) | Whisper | Standard | Performance | Full speed |
---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 34 dB(A) | 39 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 53 dB(A) |
Performance | 23 fps | 25 fps | 26 fps | 26 fps |
Processor
Compared to the Zenbook S16, which we also tested using the standard profile, the VivoBook S 14 did a lot better in the benchmarks despite its identical processor. No wonder, as this model's CPU has access to a more generous TDP (54 watts instead of 28 watts PL1). The CPU rating certifies a 10 % higher performance for the VivoBook. This also became clearly visible in the Cinebench loop, although its performance unfortunately couldn't be kept completely constant in the long run.
Nevertheless, the HX 370 beat the CPUs of all other competing laptops—be it the Core Ultra 7 155H or the Ryzen 7 8840HS or 8845HS. Technically, the Zen 5 offshoot, which is manufactured using the 4 nm process, features 12 cores and can process up to 24 threads in parallel via SMT.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37654, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4588 - 32888, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (97073 - 147937, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (20465 - 123315, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5843, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1238 - 5287, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84460 - 95053, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (47816 - 115682, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19021, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1518 - 18418, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (51277 - 79251, n=5) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11546 - 65433, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (68042 - 81929, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (24950 - 161430, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1086 - 1520, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (406 - 1379, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13959 - 20608, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1459 - 17495, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37747 - 50118, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14337 - 53954, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA |
System performance
The VivoBook also took the top spot among the comparison devices when it came to its system performance. Its RAM performance wasn't bad either, as the AIDA64 table shows.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (7487 - 7646, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4528 - 7646, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (10678 - 10918, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9143 - 11331, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (10345 - 10615, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10449, n=48, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9828 - 10983, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4220 - 10983, n=48, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1027 - 1971, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Average of class Subnotebook (980 - 1875, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1102 - 2210, n=54, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Average of class Subnotebook (958 - 1899, n=54, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M () | |
Average of class Subnotebook (225 - 448, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (259 - 266, n=2) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (176.4 - 325, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 707, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (433 - 439, n=3) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7646 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (89348 - 92030, n=6) | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 96791, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (99673 - 100903, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 122210, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (98648 - 108954, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 107658, n=54, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (111.4 - 119.4, n=6) | |
Asus Zenbook S16 UM5606 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.4 - 187.8, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
Although the laptop's latencies were the lowest in the test field, the LatencyMon tool flagged possible problems with audio and video editing in real-time—but this will only affect a specific group of users.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
Asus Zenbook 14 OLED UM3406HA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
Asus has installed a 1,000-GB M.2 SSD as mass storage. The Micron 2400 is one of the medium-fast models among the NVMe drives. Fortunately, we noted no thermal throttling and its performance remained stable even under prolonged load (see DiskSpd loop).