A 1,100 nit OLED and AMD Zen 5 in a creator‘s laptop - The Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 review
1,100 nits for $1,100
With the IdeaPad Pro 5 14, Lenovo is offering a compact multimedia laptop with a fast Ryzen 7 processor from AMD, a 120 Hz, 2.8K OLED and an HDR brightness of up to 1,100 nits, which is already calibrated out of the box.Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - The IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is impressively good value for money
The new Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14 G10 impressed us in our review with its AMD processor's high and stable performance, long battery life, and, of course, the new OLED panel. It's brighter than before and impresses with excellent image quality without the raster effect that we recently encountered with the Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10. Furthermore, Lenovo has provided accurate color profiles for both the P3 and sRGB color spaces out of the box with the more affordable model. With a maximum of just under 1,100 nits, the HDR capabilities are very good. While PWM flickering is present, the high frequency of 1.2 kHz shouldn't cause any problems.
Lenovo has slightly improved the aluminum chassis, especially around the base unit, where stability is now an upgrade over its predecessor. This mainly benefits the keyboard, which feels significantly more solid and less flimsy. There are plenty of ports, but the speakers have deteriorated considerably and make for a less enjoyable experience.
Along with the Radeon 860M iGPU, the new AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 only offers slightly more performance than the old Ryzen 7 8845HS, but this is still entirely sufficient for everyday use. However, the current Radeon 880M and 890M iGPUs, as well as the Intel Arc Graphics 140V/140T, enjoy an advantage when gaming. As with the older model, the two fast energy profiles are far too close to one other, and we would have preferred a wider range. Due to the high performance, the fans also get relatively loud, but at least there are no temperature issues. We recommend IdeaPad users create a custom profile (30-35 watts) to take advantage of the AMD processor's sweet spot.
All in all, the new IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is a good multimedia laptop at a very fair price.
Pros
Cons
Price and availabilty
At the time of our review, devices with comparable specs to the review model are unavailable from Lenovo, Amazon and Best Buy.
Table of Contents
- Verdict - The IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is impressively good value for money
- Specifications
- Case - The IdeaPad Pro uses aluminum
- Features - USB 4.0 & Copilot+
- Input device - 1.5 mm key travel
- Display - A 120 Hz, 2.8K OLED & FreeSync
- Performance - AMD Zen 5 and up to 32 GB of RAM
- Emissions - Loud fans, cool case
- Energy management - Long battery life
- Notebookcheck overall rating
- Possible alternatives compared
Lenovo's IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is a compact multimedia laptop with iGPUs that rely on AMD's latest tenth-generation Ryzen 7 (Zen 5) CPUs. It also features high-resolution OLED panels and, optionally, the extra-bright 1,100-nit model installed in our review unit. We have reviewed the Campus version that comes with a Ryzen AI 7 350, 32 GB of RAM, a 1 TB SSD and the aforementioned OLED panel for $1,123 (current exchange rate) without an operating system.
Specifications
Case - The IdeaPad Pro uses aluminum
Lenovo has used a silver-colored, aluminum chassis for its IdeaPad Pro 5 14, with only the screen frame made of slightly roughened plastic. The build quality and stability are generally very good, although we were able to hear slight creaking noises from the base unit during our torsion test. The base unit's stability is better than that of the old model, and the keyboard benefits from this as well. The lid feels better, and the hinges are properly set, even if a slight wobble cannot be prevented. The maximum opening angle is around 160 degrees. The camera bump does help with opening the lid, but it just doesn't look particularly attractive. There's a slight elevation on the bottom in the cooling area, but what is more noticeable is the high rear stand, which visibly raises the case by around 4 mm. Overall, the surfaces aren't particularly susceptible to fingerprints.
In terms of both dimensions and weight (1.4 kg), the IdeaPad sits in the middle of our comparison group. The 100-watt PSU weighs in at an additional 386 grams.
Features - USB 4.0 & Copilot+
The IdeaPad Pro offers two fast USB-C 4.0 ports and two regular USB-A ports. This selection is fine for everyday use, but an additional USB-C port on the right-hand side for charging would have been nice. It's also a Copilot+ laptop with support for Windows' advanced AI features.
SD Card Reader
When used with our reference card, the SD card reader on the left-hand side achieves average transfer speeds in the range of 78-90 MB/s. Inserted cards protrude approximately 1.8 cm from the case.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (ADATA V90) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Communication
The MediaTek Wi-Fi module supports the Wi-Fi 7 standard and Bluetooth 5.4. In our standardized Wi-Fi test with the Asus reference router, the test device achieved very high and stable transfer speeds and didn't experience any signal quality issues during testing.
| Networking | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Webcam
The 1080p webcam possesses a mechanical shutter, and although it doesn't take particularly good pictures, it gets the job done. Microsoft Studio effects are supported, and an IR sensor is on board for facial recognition via Windows Hello.
Accessories
In addition to the 100-watt PSU, our review device also came with the Lenovo WL310 Bluetooth mouse, which is available in stores for around $20.
Maintenance
The bottom case cover is secured with Trox screws (T5) and is easy to remove. Inside, you have access to the fans, the Wi-Fi module, the M.2 2242 SSD, and the screw-mounted battery. There's also an empty M.2 2280 slot available for memory expansion. The RAM, however, is soldered.
Sustainability
The IdeaPad meets several environmental standards (e.g., EPEAT Gold, Energy Star), and Lenovo claims a CO2 offset of 0.5 tons. However, no information has been provided regarding the use of recycled materials. The packaging is fully recyclable, and a service manual is available.
Input device - 1.5 mm key travel
The keyboard offers a travel of 1.5 mm and, together with the precise keystrokes, users can enjoy a very comfortable typing experience that is comparable to good Yoga laptops. The somewhat rickety impression made by last year's model is nowhere to be seen. The larger arrow keys and the dedicated page up/down keys are particularly noteworthy. The two-stage white illumination can be automatically activated via a sensor. At 13.5 x 8 cm, the ClickPad is sufficiently large and smooth to the touch, but its mechanical clicks are very loud and make it feel a bit cheap.
Display - A 120 Hz, 2.8K OLED & FreeSync
The IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is equipped with the new 2.8K OLED (2,880 x 1,800 pixels, 16:10 aspect ratio, FreeSync Premium Pro), which, in addition to higher SDR brightness, significantly improves the HDR brightness. The subjective image quality of the reflective display is excellent and, unlike the touchscreen version of the recently tested Yoga 7 14, there's also no raster effect. Movement is smooth thanks to 120 Hz, response times are extremely fast, and with the PWM frequency a very high 1.2 kHz, users shouldn't experience any problems. However, neither the brightness nor the color temperature can be adjusted automatically.
The SDR brightness is around 480 cd/m², and the black level is typically 0 for OLED, which leads to extreme contrast ratios. In HDR mode, we measured a maximum of 1,075 cd/m² and, with an almost completely white image, we still recorded 750 cd/m². This means that the HDR effect really comes into its own, and this is especially the case in movies.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 473 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
94.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 MNE007ZA3-5, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -18% | 1% | 1% | 1% | -17% | -3% | 2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 70.3 -30% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 71 -29% | 98 -2% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94.5 | 71.9 -24% | 97.2 3% | 97.6 3% | 97 3% | 72.8 -23% | 88.1 -7% | 98.9 5% |
| Response Times | -4456% | -153% | -88% | -155% | -4640% | -39% | -58% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.39 ? | 26.7 ? -6746% | 1.3 ? -233% | 0.8 ? -105% | 1.4 ? -259% | 26.3 ? -6644% | 0.44 ? -13% | 0.61 ? -56% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.49 ? | 11.1 ? -2165% | 1.2 ? -145% | 0.8 ? -63% | 1.2 ? -145% | 13.4 ? -2635% | 0.61 ? -24% | 0.67 ? -37% |
| PWM Frequency | 1200 ? | 240 ? -80% | 60 ? -95% | 480 ? -60% | 240 ? -80% | 240 ? -80% | ||
| Screen | -11% | -10% | -50% | -17% | 1% | 4% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 473 | 516 9% | 385 -19% | 500 6% | 391 -17% | 421 -11% | 400 -15% | 411 -13% |
| Brightness | 474 | 518 9% | 382 -19% | 499 5% | 386 -19% | 412 -13% | 403 -15% | 414 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 99 | 95 -4% | 95 -4% | 97 -2% | 95 -4% | 90 -9% | 97 -2% | 99 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.32 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.7 -42% | 1.99 -66% | 3.55 -196% | 1.89 -58% | 1.3 -8% | 1 17% | 2.8 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.8 | 3.2 16% | 3.69 3% | 6.38 -68% | 4.43 -17% | 2.4 37% | 2.8 26% | 5.5 -45% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 2.3 -53% | 0.8 47% | 2.2 -47% | 1.3 13% | 1.4 7% | 1.3 13% | 1.8 -20% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 2.204 100% | 1.94 113% | 2.204 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6214 105% | 6942 94% | 6474 100% | 6405 101% | 6411 101% | 6446 101% | 6586 99% | 6319 103% |
| Contrast | 1395 | 12833 | 50000 | 19550 | 1316 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 1.79 | 2.55 | 1.79 | 1.1 | 2.2 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1495% /
-821% | -54% /
-43% | -46% /
-47% | -57% /
-47% | -1552% /
-848% | -13% /
-9% | -31% /
-33% |
* ... smaller is better
Measuring the panel using the professional CalMAN software, the IdeaPad Pro surprised us here. Unlike the two more expensive Yoga 2-in-1s, it offers color profiles for P3 and sRGB. The Standard profile displays slightly oversaturated colors (similar to the default setting for Asus' OLEDs), but both the P3 and sRGB profiles already exhibit very slight deviations out of the box. Both color spaces are also fully covered, which is why the panel in the IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is also ideal for editing images and videos. With our own calibration, we were only able to improve the grayscale, but the color deviations increased somewhat.
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.17 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1200 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1200 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8516 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Outdoors, the highly reflective OLED screen struggles with reflections. While the high contrast helps, you'll soon want to find a spot in the shade. Viewing angle stability is very good.
Performance - AMD Zen 5 and up to 32 GB of RAM
On these shores, Lenovo offers the IdeaPad Pro 5 14 with either the Ryzen AI 5 340 or Ryzen AI 7 350 paired with either 24 or 32 GB of RAM (LPDDR5x 8000), which cannot be expanded. Dedicated graphics cards are not available.
Test conditions
The IdeaPad offers the familiar energy profiles Battery Saver, Adaptive Power (Auto), and Performance, which are also linked to Windows settings. The two faster profiles are located quite close to one another, as was the case with the predecessor and we would have preferred them to be further apart.
| Energy profile | TDP | CB 2024 Multi | Time Spy Graphics | max. fan volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery saver mode | 27/20 watts | 683 points | 2,628 points | 32.3 dB(A) |
| Adaptive energy mode (Auto) | 60/54 watts | 944 points | 2,973 points | 46.5 dB(A) |
| Peformance | 65 watts | 977 points | 2,983 Punkte | 48.9 dB(A) |
We conducted our benchmarks and measurements in Performance mode. However, for simple tasks, Battery Saver mode is sufficient, and the modes can be easily switched by using the Fn+Q key combination. For AC operation, the Vantage software also offers a high-performance mode, which, however, didn't result in any further performance improvement in our tests.
Processor - Ryzen AI 7 350
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 uses a total of 8 cores, including hyperthreading with two clusters. In addition to four regular Zen 5 cores at up to 5 GHz, there are also four more efficient Zen 5c cores with a lower clock speed (max. 3.5 GHz) and less cache. In the IdeaPad Pro, the processor can consume a constant 65 watts, which is why performance remains completely stable even under continuous load. Across all benchmarks, the processor performs on par with the Ryzen AI 9 365 found in the more expensive Yoga Pro 7. At around 10 % ahead of the old IdeaPad Pro with its Ryzen 7 8845HS, it has, however, to admit defeat to the RedmiBook Pro 14's Core Ultra 7 255H. Even in battery mode, the performance remains completely stable. Further CPU benchmarks are available in our technology section.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (14383 - 17899, n=3) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1943 - 2006, n=3) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (5483 - 6990, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (761 - 784, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2419 - 2651, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (294 - 305, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (183 - 246, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (48124 - 63126, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6144 - 6162, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10774 - 13988, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2836 - 2874, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3655, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (9997 - 12227, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1955 - 2127, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (19.4 - 22.7, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (50.4 - 55.6, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.403 - 0.4098, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (22795 - 27581, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87919 - 107379, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3764 - 4242, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12671 - 13677, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (46152 - 57717, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 58016, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1043 - 1117, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12177 - 14991, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47203, n=2) | |
System performance
As expected, the IdeaPad Pro 5 14 is an extremely responsive computer that produces good benchmark results. We didn't encounter any system stability issues during testing.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (6982 - 7366, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (10801 - 11189, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (9674 - 10040, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (8842 - 9654, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1696 - 2005, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2018, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1624 - 1869, n=2) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1887 - 2236, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1401 - 1784, n=2) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (295 - 328, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 479, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (249 - 270, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (278 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (436 - 437, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7366 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 85382, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63260, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 106408, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 102.5, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
In our standardized latency test (web browsing, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), the review device with the current BIOS version exhibited no limitations when using real-time audio applications. While one driver showed a slight spike, the important interrupt-to-process latency value was very low.
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The built-in 1 TB version of the SK hynix PVC10 impressed us with very high transfer speeds. While there were slight fluctuations under sustained load, this won't be noticeable in everyday use. After installing Windows, we still had 918 GB at our disposal. Storage capacity can be easily and cost-effectively expanded via the free M.2 2280 slot (PCIe 4.0 x4). Other SSD benchmarks can be found here.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The Ryzen AI 7 350 is equipped with the Radeon 860M iGPU (RDNA 3.5, 3 GHz, 8 CUs), which means it is the successor to the 760M. In everyday situations, the GPU performance is very good. However, in terms of pure performance, the 860M has to admit defeat to both the Radeon 880M as well as the Arc Graphics 140T. The old Radeon 780M is beaten, as is the Arc Graphics 130V found in the Lunar Lake processors. This situation was also confirmed in the gaming tests, and demanding titles such as Cyberpunk 2077 or Baldur's Gate 3 can only be played smoothly at 1080p with low graphics details. GPU performance remained completely stable both on battery power and under continuous load. Further GPU benchmarks are available in our technology section.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12267 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7241 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3342 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 490 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2582 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2570 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (283 - 381, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 172.5 | 160.5 | 74.7 | 28 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 166.4 | 137.9 | 83.4 | 78.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 85.6 | 41.5 | 28.6 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 77.2 | 59.7 | 47.7 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 104 | 47 | 43 | 40 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 171.3 | 68.2 | 55.7 | 45.5 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.9 | 29.9 | 23.5 | 23.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 40.4 | 31 | 24.3 | 19.9 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 77.2 | 69.6 | 51.8 | 10.6 |
Emissions - Loud fans, cool case
Noise emissions
Under light load, the two fans are usually deactivated. For everyday tasks, we recommend using the battery-saving mode since the fans reach a maximum of around 32 dB(A) even under heavy load. However, in the other two profiles, things get very loud at 46.5 and 48.9 dB(A), respectively, and this is even louder than the old model. We therefore recommend using headphones while gaming. No other electronic noises were emitted from the review device.
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 46.5 / 48.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, YMTC PC411-1TB | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 Radeon 740M, R5 7540U, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 Radeon 780M, R7 8845HS, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 8% | 0% | 3% | 6% | 5% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 25 -6% | 24 -2% | 24.7 -5% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 25 -6% | 25 -6% | 24.7 -5% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 26 -10% | 27 -14% | 24.7 -5% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 23.8 -1% | 24.2 -3% | 29 -23% | 29 -23% | 26.3 -11% | 23.8 -1% | 23.9 -1% |
| Load Average * | 46.5 | 30 35% | 28.8 38% | 40 14% | 37 20% | 37.6 19% | 44.6 4% | 44.3 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.9 | 42.2 14% | 37.6 23% | 40 18% | 37 24% | 37.6 23% | 35.9 27% | |
| Load Maximum * | 48.9 | 45.3 7% | 45.6 7% | 41 16% | 38 22% | 37.6 23% | 44.6 9% | 44.3 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
One advantage of the fast fans is the low surface temperatures under load, and we measured a maximum of 42°C. This is completely safe and means the laptop can even be rested on your lap without any problems. The surfaces remained pleasantly cool during simple tasks, and in the stress test, the processor again remained at a stable 65 watts.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.3 °C / 82.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U, AMD Radeon 740M | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -8% | -2% | -4% | -6% | -8% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42.2 | 41.9 1% | 38.4 9% | 41 3% | 39 8% | 41.7 1% | 42 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42.4 | 52.1 -23% | 49.7 -17% | 45 -6% | 46 -8% | 50.1 -18% | 40.6 4% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.4 | 26.3 -4% | 25.1 1% | 26 -2% | 28 -10% | 27.1 -7% | 28.2 -11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.7 | 27.4 -7% | 25.8 -0% | 28 -9% | 29 -13% | 27.7 -8% | 28.9 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The two stereo speakers are certainly the IdeaPad Pro 5 14's weak area. In addition to the limited maximum volume, the sound is extremely thin. Neither music nor videos are very enjoyable. This is an area where the predecessor did significantly better.
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy management - Long battery life
Power consumption
Despite the high brightness and 120 Hz frequency, the power consumption is relatively low. At full SDR brightness, we measured just 6.9 watts. Under load, the processor's high power limit became noticeable, and consumption peaked at 104.8 watts and remained roughly at this level. During our one-hour stress test, the battery didn't drain, so the 100-watt power supply was just enough to cover the consumption.
| Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.59 Watt |
| Idle | 5.1 / 6.8 / 6.9 Watt |
| Load |
71.7 / 104.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, YMTC PC411-1TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2550 512GB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TFK, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average AMD Radeon 860M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | 34% | 24% | 18% | 5% | 3% | 1% | 1% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 5.2 -2% | 2.7 47% | 5 2% | 5 2% | 4.6 10% | 5.5 -8% | 5.3 -4% | 4.9 ? 4% | 4.31 ? 15% |
| Idle Average * | 6.8 | 9.3 -37% | 6.7 1% | 6 12% | 6 12% | 7.8 -15% | 7.6 -12% | 7.2 -6% | 7.5 ? -10% | 7.33 ? -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.9 | 10.3 -49% | 6.9 -0% | 10 -45% | 10 -45% | 8 -16% | 7.9 -14% | 7.5 -9% | 7.95 ? -15% | 9.09 ? -32% |
| Load Average * | 71.7 | 56.5 21% | 34.5 52% | 36 50% | 41 43% | 71.7 -0% | 77.9 -9% | 65.6 9% | 65.4 ? 9% | 44.9 ? 37% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 84.8 | 70 17% | 43 49% | 41.6 51% | 42.5 50% | 71.4 16% | 63 26% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 83.5 | 65 22% | 41.9 50% | 38.2 54% | 68.5 18% | 61.5 26% | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 104.8 | 101.8 3% | 62.7 40% | 60 43% | 58 45% | 83 21% | 94.8 10% | 89.6 15% | 89.4 ? 15% | 68.7 ? 34% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 73 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
Battery life
With a battery capacity measuring 84 Wh, the battery life is very good overall. In the Wi-Fi test at 150 cd/m² (corresponding to 59% of the maximum SDR brightness on the review device), the device kept going for just under 14 hours, and at full SDR brightness, it still managed just over 9 hours. This even makes video playback possible for almost 20 hours. Under load, however, the other extreme is evident: since the performance isn't reduced, the battery drained after just 52 minutes. A full charge with the device turned on takes 94 minutes (50% after 28 minutes and 80% after 52 minutes).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 84 Wh | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 80 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 R5 7540U, Radeon 740M, 60 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 80 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, 73 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AHP9 R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M, 84 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | 87% | -10% | -29% | 18% | -1% | 28% | 36% | |
| H.264 | 1177 | 1199 2% | 929 -21% | 649 -45% | 1031 -12% | 963 ? -18% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 833 | 970 16% | 1030 24% | 753 -10% | 590 -29% | 715 -14% | 527 -37% | 710 -15% | 757 ? -9% |
| Load | 52 | 174 235% | 99 90% | 93 79% | 110 112% | 122 ? 135% |
Notebookcheck overall rating
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10
- 04/11/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.4%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,185.00 Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 5 A... 2. $657.00 Lenovo Ideapad 5 14" 2-in-1 ... 3. $693.00 IdeaPad 5 2-in-1-2024 - Prof... List Price: 989€ | 1.4 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 87.3%  | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 14 2025 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $15.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $20.99 Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protect... 3. $18.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Back Protector... List Price: 1090€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
3. 85.9%  | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,159.00 ASUS Vivobook S 14 Copilot+ ... 2. $588.00 ASUS Vivobook S 14 AI Powere... 3. $1,169.00 ASUS Vivobook S 14 OLED Slim... List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
4. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
5. 83.9%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 6 14APU8 AMD Ryzen 5 7540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $589.99 List Price: 800 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
6. 84.9%  | SCHENKER XMG Evo 14 (M24) AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1200€ | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS |
7. 85.1%  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $980.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 2. $1,099.99 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9 Lap... 3. $1,949.00 Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16"" Lapt... List Price: 1599€ | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI OLED |
More articles related to this device
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (IdeaPad Pro Series)Related Articles
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
