Verdict - Blackwell for price-conscious gamers
While gaming laptops based on the RTX 5070 upwards are usually quite expensive, RTX 5060 devices tend to be in the $1,200 range, which is particularly attractive for many users. Lenovo's LOQ series has always stood for a solid price-to-performance ratio, so the RTX 5060 should be a fitting choice for potential buyers. Although the graphics card is only limited at 8 GB GDDR7, most games will still run smoothly on the device even using higher settings—at least in Full HD.
Our test model with the suffix AHP10 is joined by a Ryzen 7 250, which is also a mid-range component. Its total package is rounded off by 16 GB DDR5 RAM (unfortunately only single-channel) and a 1 TB NVMe SSD. The manufacturer has gone for a classic IPS panel with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,080 pixels and a specified refresh rate of 144 Hz, which delivered a decent performance during our test.
If you exclude its high operating noise in idle mode (only affects the Performance profile), the laptop's weaknesses we identified are rather minor or secondary for a gaming laptop. For example, its battery life/capacity could be higher, and a second RAM bar and better SSD cooling would have benefited the 15-inch laptop.
Pros
Cons
Price and availability
At the time of writing, the AMD version which we tested is not yet available to purchase. However, its prices should be pretty similar to those of its Intel counterpart with the Core i5-13450HX. The latter currently costs around $1,130 (available from Lenovo).
The LOQ 15's competitors include other mid-range gaming laptops based on Blackwell, such as the aforementioned Legion 5 15 (RTX 5060), as well as the the Gigabyte Aero X16 and MSI Katana 17 (both RTX 5070). All of these devices appear in the tables as comparison models.
Specifications
Case
The laptop's case seems to match that of its predecessor almost 1:1. On the outside, Lenovo has relied entirely on plastic, which doesn't make the device feel terribly high-quality. Still, its stability and build quality are more than decent. In addition, its gray surfaces aren't as prone to collecting fingerprint marks as black laptops are. Its generous opening angle is a big plus: the device's screen can be opened by a respectable 180°. In terms of its design, the manufacturer has achieved a good mix of playful and not too flashy.
When it comes to its dimensions and weight, the LOQ 15 isn't out of line either. Weighing in at 2.4 kilograms, it's heavier than the Aero X16 and the Legion 5 (~2 kilograms), but lighter than the Katana 17 (2.7 kilograms), which additionally occupies the top position among the comparison devices when it comes to height.
Connectivity
Ports
Unfortunately, Lenovo hasn't improved the distribution of the laptop's ports. You'll have to make do without USB on the left, which is just as poor in our eyes as the manufacturer's decision to only install one USB-C port (that doesn't support Thunderbolt). At least there are 3x USB-A ports. Image output can be achieved via HDMI or DisplayPort (via USB-C). There is also an audio jack and a Gigabit Ethernet port. Lenovo hasn't included a card reader.
Communication
Wireless communication takes place via a Wi-Fi 6 module from Realtek (RTL8852), which unfortunately only achieved mediocre speeds during our WLAN test—similar to the predecessor model.
Webcam
According to Lenovo, its webcam has a resolution of 5 MP, which helps give it above-average image sharpness levels. In turn, its color accuracy is only average. An eShutter for the webcam is conveniently located on the right side of the device.

Accessories
The laptop comes with several information booklets and a reasonably compact 170-watt power supply unit, which weighs just under 600 grams with the power cable included.
Maintenance
Its maintenance options are typical for a gaming laptop. After removing 10 Phillips screws, the base plate can be levered out of its anchoring to reveal the device's inner workings (see photos). While the two M.2 slots (up to type 2280) are exposed, the two SO-DIMM banks are covered by a heat sink, which can be removed quite easily. The battery, cooling system and wireless module are also accessible.
Sustainability
The topic of sustainability could be handled even better by Lenovo, as the device has a lot of plastic in its packaging.
Warranty
In the United States, the laptop is covered by a standard 12-month warranty.
Input devices
Keyboard
The device's keyboard should satisfy most buyers. As with almost all Rubberdome models, there is still room for improvement in terms of its typing feel, but the result is at least sufficient for gaming laptop standards. We particularly like its generously sized directional arrow keys. The numeric keypad, on the other hand, has to make do with somewhat narrower keys due to a lack of space. Lenovo has opted for white multi-level adjustable backlighting. We deem the manufacturer's chosen layout to be successful.
Touchpad
The mouse replacement, which is positioned quite far to the left, features a solid size of 12 x 7.5 centimeters and feels relatively smooth and precise. It, of course, supports multi-touch gestures. Lenovo could make some improvements to its stability and click behavior. Pressing on the click areas at the bottom edge sounds rather rickety and, as a result, makes the device feel a little cheap.
Display
The laptop's display proved to be quite unspectacular in almost all disciplines, i.e. neither bad nor particularly good. Starting with its brightness, which averaged 300 cd/m² during our test. While outdoor use is therefore pretty much out of the question, this value is good enough for most indoor areas.
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 318 cd/m²
Contrast: 1590:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.33 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83, calibrated: 0.94
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
69.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.187
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 BOE NJ NE156FHM-NX9, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH MNG007DA5-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK CSOT MNH301CA3-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 30% | 1% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.3 | 73.7 10% | 99.9 48% | 68.7 2% | 97.3 45% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 99.1 0% | 100 1% | 96.1 -3% | 99.6 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.1 | 72.6 5% | 98.3 42% | 71.2 3% | 89 29% |
Response Times | -16% | 99% | 70% | 71% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.9 ? | 42.2 ? -24% | 0.42 ? 99% | 12 ? 65% | 5.2 ? 85% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21.2 ? | 22.6 ? -7% | 0.4 ? 98% | 5.6 ? 74% | 9.2 ? 57% |
PWM Frequency | 1152 ? | ||||
PWM Amplitude * | 11 | ||||
Screen | -20% | 42% | -2% | -13% | |
Brightness middle | 318 | 306 -4% | 492 55% | 395 24% | 296 -7% |
Brightness | 300 | 287 -4% | 495 65% | 398 33% | 272 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 92 3% | 97 9% | 87 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.21 -5% | 0.32 -60% | 0.27 -35% | |
Contrast | 1590 | 1457 -8% | 1234 -22% | 1096 -31% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.33 | 2.25 -69% | 0.9 32% | 1.3 2% | 1.35 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.42 | 4.84 -10% | 1.8 59% | 2.8 37% | 4.76 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.94 | 1.45 -54% | 1.4 -49% | 0.78 17% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 2.4 -26% | 1.2 37% | 1.8 5% | 2.7 -42% |
Gamma | 2.187 101% | 2.259 97% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.201 100% |
CCT | 6678 97% | 6790 96% | 6291 103% | 6842 95% | 6770 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-14% | 57% /
49% | 23% /
9% | 28% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Thanks to its low black value of 0.2 cd/m², this results in a reasonable contrast of around 1,600:1. Its color space coverage is also acceptable in view of its near 100% sRGB coverage, although it doesn't fully cover AdobeRGB and DCI-P3.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.2 ms rise | |
↘ 11 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.5 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8347 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
As mentioned at the beginning, the Lenovo LOQ 15 belongs to the mid-range segment—regardless of whether it has an AMD or Intel CPU. 16 GB of RAM should currently still be sufficient for games (although we would recommend a dual-channel configuration for performance reasons). The same applies to its 1 TB of storage space, unless you need or want to store your private movie collection or the like.
Testing conditions
The pre-installed Legion software offers plenty of setting options in the "Device Management" menu regarding the GPU mode (hybrid, iGPU only, dGPU only) and the general system mode, the differences of which can be seen in the following table. Very nice: Depending on the profile, the power button is framed by a different color (blue = Quiet, white = Balanced, red = Performance). With the exception of the battery test, we carried out all our measurements in Performance mode, which delivered noticeably more FPS than Balanced mode—at the expense of noise development, of course. Graphics switching was active in each case.
Mode | Quiet | Balanced | Performance |
Cyberpunk 2077 Noise | 38 dB(A) | 45 dB(A) | 51 dB(A) |
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) | 65.2fps | 74.6fps | 88.6fps |
Cinebench R15 Multi score | 2020 points | 2379 points | 2520 points |
CPU PL1 | 25 watts | 40 watts | 43 watts |
CPU PL2 | 25 watts | 50 watts | 53 watts |
Processor
Until now, we have yet to test the Ryzen 7 250, an eight-core model from the Hawk Point generation, which is based on Zen 4 architecture. The chip can process up to 16 threads in parallel via SMT. Further specifications can be found on our CPU page. The R7 250 cut a reasonable figure during our benchmark course. Its performance was relatively in the middle between the Core i5-13450HX and the Core i7-14650HX. The Ryzen 7 260 and the Ryzen AI 7 350 were just under 10% faster in total. Great: Its performance remained stable during the Cinebench loop, so there were no drops.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (19614 - 24656, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (79019 - 98709, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (3817 - 4563, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (97511 - 114915, n=2) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (12847 - 14798, n=2) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (42572 - 53836, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (68090 - 69033, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (850 - 1074, n=2) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (10504 - 13039, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (23228 - 40403, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
System performance
Furthermore, its system performance was as expected or at least came without any surprises, with the LOQ 15 performing very similarly to its predecessor.
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop -2! | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=111, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=111, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=123, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=133, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7304 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (35838 - 68811, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=142, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (30770 - 60683, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (42376 - 86628, n=2) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=142, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 250 (94.1 - 98.4, n=2) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
At first glance, the installed 1 TB drive from Micron (model 2500) performed convincingly. Sequentially, it proved to be one of the fastest comparison devices, together with the Katana 17 and the Legion 5. However, as our DiskSpd loop showed, its speed fluctuated considerably over time, just like its predecessor. On the other hand, it's great that users have access to a second M.2 slot for upgrades.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU performance
The mobile GeForce RTX 5060 is a relatively affordable model from Nvidia's current Blackwell generation. Compared to the mobile RTX 5070, it only contains 3,328 shader units instead of 4,608, but can also rely on 8 GB GDDR7 RAM connected via 128-bit. Lenovo has used the maximum specified TGP of 115 watts (including Dynamic Boost). According to the synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 5060 is roughly on par with the RTX 5070 despite its lower number of shaders. It outperformed the RTX 4060 of the old LOQ 15 by around 23% overall during our tests. Further benchmarks and information can be found on our GPU page.
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 54494 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 81794 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 31563 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 177944 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 53299 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27579 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11594 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming performance
During the gaming tests, the RTX 5070 was also roughly on par in Full HD. According to our performance rating, the corresponding laptops came only just ahead, whereas the old RTX 4060—disappointingly for the RTX 5060—was only outperformed by around 10% (although this may be related to the CPU and RAM configuration to a certain extent).
In QHD, the gaps widened as expected, although it should be said that the RTX 5060—at least at maximum settings and without upscaling—often no longer cracked the 40fps mark in this scenario, so you'll have to rely on the use of DLSS or (Multi) Frame Generation. VRAM-heavy games in particular, such as Indiana Jones, additionally showed that 8 GB is now nearing its limits and will likely cause frequent problems, especially in the future. As a result, passionate gamers should opt for a GPU with at least 12 or, even better, 16 GB—although buyers will have to pay handsomely for this.
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=121, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (83.2 - 90.8, n=4) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (78.7 - 110.7, n=4) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=124, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (108.7 - 128.5, n=3) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=140, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (118.1 - 126, n=3) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=132, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (219 - 235, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 |
Stalker 2 | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (31.7 - 65.4, n=9, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset + Quality DLSS + FG | |
Average of class Gaming (58.3 - 134.6, n=9, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
Doom: The Dark Ages | |
2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (35 - 82.1, n=12, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare - DLSS Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (54.6 - 107.3, n=11, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
Assassin's Creed Shadows | |
2560x1440 Ultra High | |
Average of class Gaming (25 - 64, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (25 - 29, n=3) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High + DLSS Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (33 - 117, n=19, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (42.6 - 86, n=8, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
Average of class Gaming (57.6 - 114.5, n=8, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | |
2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (9.43 - 115.9, n=26, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset - DLSS Quality | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 133.7, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 |
F1 25 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (9.33 - 37.5, n=11, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (9.33 - 13, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset + DLSS Quality AA:DLSS AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (18.3 - 67.5, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (18.3 - 21.9, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 |
No GPU throttling occurred during the long-term test with Cyberpunk 2077. The frame rates we noted were fairly constant over the entire run.
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 171.7 | 160.3 | 108.7 | 100.9 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 142.6 | 129.3 | 125.7 | 121.5 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 153.9 | 118.1 | 87 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 99.8 | 87 | 72.1 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 286 | 248 | 223 | 157.8 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 124.3 | 105.7 | 101 | 105.9 | 71.8 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 112 | 95.6 | 88.6 | 71.7 | 55.4 | |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 93.8 | 58.8 | 52.9 | 59.9 | 48.1 | |
Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 78.7 | 73.1 | 59 | 60.2 | 46.3 | |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 55.8 | 40.8 | 44 | 29 | ||
F1 24 (2024) | 219 | 195 | 71 | 65 | 39 | |
Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 46.5 | 43.6 | 38.1 | 38.6 | 27.6 | |
Space Marine 2 (2024) | 66 | 65.7 | 65.2 | 62.8 | 55.6 | |
Until Dawn (2024) | 83.8 | 65.9 | 49.3 | 46.4 | 35.2 | |
Stalker 2 (2024) | 54.3 | 48.5 | 42 | 62.8 | 31.8 | |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 68.1 | 15.6 | 0 () | 9.43 | ||
Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 102.8 | 85.9 | 61.1 | 57.6 | 45.6 | |
Civilization 7 (2025) | 163.1 | 148.6 | 96 | |||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 56 | 46 | 33 | 33 | 25 | |
The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 66.9 | 48.2 | 26.5 | 25.3 | 12.7 | |
Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 63.2 | 57.8 | 57.3 | 55.1 | 35 | |
F1 25 (2025) | 152 | 146 | 24 | 21 | 13 |
Emissions
Noise emissions
One of the issues with the LOQ 15 is its poor fan control in Performance mode (the following problem is barely present using Balanced mode). Even when the laptop has nothing to do, its two case fans already roar up to a very audible 43 to 48 dB(A)—a level that some competitors only reach under (full) load. Lenovo should definitely do something about this (perhaps it's "just" a bug at the moment). In 3D mode (Cyberpunk 2077 & stress test), our measuring devices noted 51 to 53 dB(A), which was a bit higher than the competitors.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 43 / 45 / 48 dB(A) |
Load |
| 53 / 53 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 16% | 24% | 27% | 10% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 25 -0% | 25.5 -2% | 23.9 4% | 25 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 43 | 26 40% | 25.5 41% | 23.9 44% | 31 28% |
Idle Average * | 45 | 34 24% | 25.5 43% | 23.9 47% | 32 29% |
Idle Maximum * | 48 | 36 25% | 26.9 44% | 23.9 50% | 34 29% |
Load Average * | 53 | 48 9% | 34.6 35% | 33.2 37% | 50 6% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 51 | 48 6% | 50.1 2% | 50.2 2% | 58 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 53 | 50 6% | 50.1 5% | 50.2 5% | 59 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The underside of the device's case heats up the most. The maximum of 58 °C which we measured on its case speaks against longer gaming sessions. While the top generally doesn't get quite as hot, reaching a maximum of 49 °C during our test, we would have liked to see a cooler palm rest, among other things. When idling, its chassis stabilized at just under 30 °C—a moderate value.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 43 °C / 109.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-14.1 °C / -25.4 F).
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | 9% | 11% | -4% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49 | 47 4% | 42.2 14% | 43.3 12% | 52 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 58 -0% | 51.7 11% | 50.3 13% | 56 3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32 | 32 -0% | 28.5 11% | 27 16% | 33 -3% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 36 -24% | 29.2 -1% | 28.3 2% | 32 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
Stress test
During the stress test using the Furmark and Prime95 tools, the laptop's GPU (83 °C) heated up more than its CPU (71 °C), which is rather unusual. When running Cyberpunk 2077, both components comfortably sat at around 80 °C.
Speakers
The device's sound quality is similar to its predecessor, which also pretty average. As with so many laptops, its bass in particular could be more powerful.
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy management
Power consumption
Compared to competitor devices, the LOQ 15's idle consumption is quite high at an average of 21 watts, while its rivals only consume between 11 and 18 watts. Under load, we measured between 71 and 172 watts, so its power supply still seems to be sufficient in size.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | 16% | 27% | -15% | -18% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 13 35% | 6.9 65% | 5.8 71% | 9.7 51% | 14.1 ? 29% |
Idle Average * | 20.7 | 18 13% | 10.7 48% | 10.9 47% | 15 28% | 20.1 ? 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.7 | 24 -6% | 11.3 50% | 11.2 51% | 23.7 -4% | 27.1 ? -19% |
Load Average * | 71 | 85 -20% | 69.7 2% | 91.3 -29% | 126 -77% | 107.6 ? -52% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 151.1 | 150.9 -0% | 165 -9% | 117.9 22% | 202 -34% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 153.1 | 155.7 -2% | 162.6 -6% | 123.8 19% | 205 -34% | |
Load Maximum * | 172 | 232 -35% | 233.6 -36% | 155.3 10% | 227 -32% | 260 ? -51% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
The runtime of its 60 Wh battery isn't one of the strengths of the LOQ 15. During our WLAN test with the brightness reduced to 150 cd/m², the 15-inch device lasted just 4.5 hours. The competition managed at least 5 hours in this scenario, partly thanks to them having larger batteries (75 to 80 Wh).
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 76 Wh | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 75 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 19% | 55% | 91% | 13% | 32% | |
Reader / Idle | 414 | 572 ? 38% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 270 | 320 19% | 579 114% | 515 91% | 305 13% | 387 ? 43% |
Load | 75 | 72 -4% | 86.4 ? 15% | |||
H.264 | 687 | 459 ? | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 56 |
Notebookcheck total rating
The Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 is an exciting 15-inch gamer in terms of its price, but it could do with better fan control in some system modes.
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
- 06/30/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $120.99 20V 12.25A 245W Slim Tip Cha... 2. $899.00 Lenovo LOQ 15AHP9 3. $18.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo LOQ 15IRX9 Intel Core i5-13450HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,319.00 List Price: 1149 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,199.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15.1" OLED W... 2. $26.95 YFLAPFAN (1 Pair) New CPU GP... 3. $29.99 GKLSPL 230W Slim AC Charger ... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,449.99 GIGABYTE - AERO X16 - Copilo... 2. $1,599.00 GIGABYTE AERO 16 OLED: 16" 1... 3. $18.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Protector Film... List Price: 1799€ | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Core i7-14650HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,532.11 MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK-077C... 2. $49.99 230W 200W AC Adapter Replace... List Price: 1800 EUR | 2.7 kg | 28 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.